asking users and experts changsung moon jaeyoung lee
TRANSCRIPT
Asking Users and ExpertsAsking Users and Experts
Changsung Moon
Jaeyoung Lee
The Main AimsThe Main AimsDiscuss when it is appropriate to use different
types of interviews and questionnaires.
Teach you the basics of questionnaire design.
Describe how to do interviews, heuristic evaluation, and walkthroughs.
Describe how to collect, analyze, and present data.
Discuss the strengths and limitations of these techniques.
The Types of one-on-one The Types of one-on-one InterviewsInterviews
Unstructured (or open-ended)◦ Questions or topics are open-ended, interviewee is
free to answer in any manner, and topics do not have to be covered in any particular order. Ex) Suggest ways of collecting the interview data.
Structured◦ Most controlled type.◦ Interview may consist of closed-ended questions
and interviewee must choose from the options provided. Ex) Would you like to receive news from CNN? Yes No Don’t know
Semi-structured◦ Combination of structured and unstructured
Ex) Would you listen to the news from CNN? If yes, why? If no, why not?
The Types of one-on-one The Types of one-on-one InterviewsInterviews
Unstructured (or open-ended)◦ Questions or topics are open-ended, interviewee is
free to answer in any manner, and topics do not have to be covered in any particular order. Ex) Suggest ways of collecting the interview data.
Structured◦ Most controlled type.◦ Interview may consist of closed-ended questions
and interviewee must choose from the options provided. Ex) Would you like to receive news from CNN? Yes No Don’t know
Semi-structured◦ Combination of structured and unstructured
Ex) Would you listen to the news from CNN? If yes, why? If no, why not?
The Types of one-on-one The Types of one-on-one InterviewsInterviews
Unstructured (or open-ended)◦ Questions or topics are open-ended, interviewee is
free to answer in any manner, and topics do not have to be covered in any particular order. Ex) Suggest ways of collecting the interview data.
Structured◦ Most controlled type.◦ Interview may consist of closed-ended questions
and interviewee must choose from the options provided. Ex) Would you like to receive news from CNN? Yes No Don’t know
Semi-structured◦ Combination of structured and unstructured
Ex) Would you listen to the news from CNN? If yes, why? If no, why not?
The Types of one-on-one The Types of one-on-one InterviewsInterviews
Unstructured (or open-ended)◦ Questions or topics are open-ended, interviewee is
free to answer in any manner, and topics do not have to be covered in any particular order. Ex) Suggest ways of collecting the interview data.
Structured◦ Most controlled type.◦ Interview may consist of closed-ended questions
and interviewee must choose from the options provided. Ex) Would you like to receive news from CNN? Yes No Don’t know
Semi-structured◦ Combination of structured and unstructured
Ex) Would you listen to the news from CNN? If yes, why? If no, why not?
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this
website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Guidelines for Developing Guidelines for Developing interview questions (Things to interview questions (Things to avoid)avoid) Long questions
◦ They are difficult to remember. Compound sentences
◦ Ex) Wrong: “How do you like this cell phone compared with previous ones that you have owned?”
◦ Right: “How do you like this cell phone?”, “Have you owned other cell phones?” If so, “How did you like it?” (easier to understand and record)
Using jargon◦ The interviewee may not understand.
Leading questions◦ Ex) Wrong: “Most of our users prefer the new look and feel of our site
over the old one. How do you feel?”◦ Right: “How do you feel about the visual appearance of this
website?”
Unconscious biases◦ Ex) Wrong: “Safety experts recommend using a travel agent instead
of booking your travel online. Do you feel safe using travel websites?”◦ Right: “Do you feel that booking travel online is more or less
confidential than booking through a travel agent?”
Timeline for an InterviewTimeline for an Interview
Group InterviewsGroup Interviews ‘focus group’: one form of group interview
Normally 3 to 10 people are involved
Participants are selected to provide a representative sample of typical users; ◦ they share certain characteristics
Benefit is that it allows diverse or sensitive issues that would otherwise be missed
QuestionnairesQuestionnairesQuestions can be closed or open (similar to
interview)◦ Closed questions are easier to analyze
can be administered to large populations◦ Paper, email and the web used for dissemination
Electronic questionnaires◦ Data goes into a database and is easy to analyze
Online questionnaires◦ Sampling can be a problem when the size of a
population is unknown
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Advice for Designing a Advice for Designing a QuestionnaireQuestionnaire
Make questions clear and specific When possible, ask closed questions and offer a range of
answers Consider including a “no-opinion” option General questions should precede specific ones Avoid complex multiple questions The range of answers is appropriate and does not overlap
◦ Ex) 15-20, 20-25 (X) 15-19, 20-25 (O)
The ordering of scales should be intuitive and consistent◦ Ex) 1 to 5, for 1 to indicate low agreement and 5 to indicate high
agreement
Avoid jargon Prove clear instructions on how to complete the
questionnaire Keep the questionnaire as compact as possible
Question and Response Question and Response FormatFormat
Different types of questions require different types of responses.
Check boxes and Ranges◦ Ex) under 21 21-65 over 65
Likert Scales◦ Ex) The use of color is excellent: (where 1
represents strongly agree and 5 represents strongly disagree)
◦ 1 2 3 4 5
Semantic differential scales◦ Ex) Exciting Boring
What to Do with the DataWhat to Do with the Data Identify any trends or patterns
Using a spreadsheet like Excel can help in initial analysis
Often simple statistics are needed
Bar charts can be used to display data graphically
More advanced statistics can be used◦ show whether there is a relationship between question
and responses
ASKING EXPERTSASKING EXPERTS
Why Asking Experts?Why Asking Experts?Sometimes users are not easily
accessible.Involving users is too expensiveEvaluating a interface design takes
so long time.
Skillful experts can capture many of the usability problems by themselves.
We can employ just few experts.
Two Different Technologies Two Different Technologies for Asking Expertsfor Asking Experts
Inspections◦Heuristic Evaluation
Walkthrough◦Cognitive Walkthrough◦Pluralistic Walkthrough
Heuristic EvaluationHeuristic Evaluation
Heuristic EvaluationHeuristic EvaluationA discount method for quick,
cheap, and easy evaluation of the user interface.
Developed by Jacob Nielsen in the early 1990s based on heuristics ◦distilled from an empirical analysis of
249 usability problems
Heuristic Evaluation -Heuristic Evaluation -10 10 HeuristicsHeuristicsVisibility of system statusMatch between system and the real worldUser control and freedomConsistency and standardsHelp users recognize, diagnose, and recover
from errorsError preventionRecognition rather than recallFlexibility and efficiency of useAesthetic and minimalist designHelp and documentation
“Are users kept informed about what is going on?”“Is appropriate feed back provided within reasonable time about a user’s action?”
Heuristic EvaluationHeuristic EvaluationRevised for current technology◦HOMERUN for the Web : These heuristics
are more useful for evaluating commercial websites. High-quality content Often updated Minimal download time Ease of use Relevant to users’ needs Unique to the online medium Netcentric corporate culture
Heuristics still needed for new technologies◦mobile devices, wearable interfaces, virtual
worlds, etc.
How many Experts?How many Experts?Nielsen found that about 5
evaluations found 75% of the problems
Above that you get more, but at decreasing efficiency
Three Stages for Doing Three Stages for Doing Heuristic EvaluationHeuristic EvaluationBriefing session to tell experts what
to doEvaluation period of 1-2 hours in
which:◦Each expert works separately◦Take one pass to get a feel for the
product◦Take a second pass to focus on specific
featuresDebriefing session in which experts
work together to prioritize problems
Advantages and ProblemsAdvantages and ProblemsBest experts have knowledge of
application domain & usersFew ethical & practical issues to
considerCan be difficult & expensive to find
expertsBiggest problems◦important problems may get missed◦many trivial problems are often
identified
WalkthroughsWalkthroughs
Cognitive Walkthroughs
Pluralistic Walkthroughs
Cognitive WalkthroughsCognitive Walkthroughs
“Cognitive walkthroughs involve simulating a user’s problem-solving process at each step in the human-computer dialog, checking to see if the user’s goals and memory for actions can be assumed to lead to the next correct action.”
(Nielsen and Mack, 1994)
Four Steps of Cognitive Four Steps of Cognitive WalkthroughsWalkthroughs
Analysis TasksEvaluate each taskCompile the record of critical
informationSuggest revised design
Steps involved in Cognitive Steps involved in Cognitive Walkthroughs – First StepWalkthroughs – First StepThe characteristics of typical users
are identified and documented. Sample tasks are developed that
focus on the aspects of the design to be evaluated.
A description or prototype of the interface is also produced, along with a clear sequence of the actions needed for the users to complete the task.
Steps involved in Cognitive Steps involved in Cognitive Walkthroughs – Second StepWalkthroughs – Second StepDesigners and one or more
expert evaluators then come together to do the analysis
The evaluators walk through the action sequences for each task, placing it within the context of a typical scenario.
Steps involved in Cognitive Steps involved in Cognitive Walkthroughs – Second StepWalkthroughs – Second StepWhile experts are evaluating
each task, they try to answer the following questions◦Will the correct action be sufficiently
evident to the user?◦Will the user notice that the correct
action is available?◦Will the user associate and interpret
the response from the action correctly?
Steps involved in Cognitive Steps involved in Cognitive Walkthroughs – Third StepWalkthroughs – Third StepAs the walkthrough is being
done, a record of critical information is compiled in which:◦The assumptions about what would
cause problems and why are recorded.
◦Notes about side issues and design changes are made.
◦A summary of the results is compiled.
Steps involved in Cognitive Steps involved in Cognitive Walkthroughs – Fourth StepWalkthroughs – Fourth StepThe design is then revised to fix
the problems presented.
Pluralistic WalkthroughsPluralistic Walkthroughs
What is Pluralistic What is Pluralistic Walkthrough?Walkthrough?“Another type of walkthrough in
which users, developers and usability experts work together to step through a scenario, discussing usability issues associated with dialog elements involved in the scenario steps”
(Nielsen and Mack, 1994)
Steps of Doing Steps of Doing Pluralistic WalkthroughsPluralistic WalkthroughsScenarios are developed in the
form of a series of hard-copy screens
The scenarios are presented to the panel of evaluators.
The panelists discuss the actions that they suggested for that round of the review.
Then the panel moves on to the next round of screens.
What is benefit of What is benefit of Pluralistic Walkthrough?Pluralistic Walkthrough?Pluralistic walkthroughs have the
advantage of providing a diverse range of skills and perspectives.
The result of pluralistic walkthroughs includes a strong focus on users’ tasks.
The approach also lends itself well to participatory design practices by involving a multidisciplinary team in which users play a key role.
Thank you~Thank you~
Any question?Any question?