assessing gender disparities and its effects on women's livelihood

54
1 UNIVERSITY FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FACULTY OF PLANNING AND LAND MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH TOPIC: ASSESSING GENDER DISPARITIES AND ITS EFFECTS ON WOMEN’S LIVELIHOODS IN PIREE COMMUNITY IN THE UPPER WEST REGION OF GHANA. A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY FOR DEVELOPMENT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE AWARD OF B.A INTEGRATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP 39 JULY, 2013

Upload: paul-akuamoah-boateng

Post on 15-Apr-2017

56 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

UNIVERSITY FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

FACULTY OF PLANNING AND LAND MANAGEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

RESEARCH TOPIC: ASSESSING GENDER DISPARITIES AND ITS

EFFECTS ON WOMEN’S LIVELIHOODS IN PIREE COMMUNITY IN THE

UPPER WEST REGION OF GHANA.

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY FOR

DEVELOPMENT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE AWARD OF B.A

INTEGRATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

GROUP 39

JULY, 2013

2

DECLARATION

The group hereby declares that this work is the outcome of our independent investigation

except for references made to the work of other researches which have been duly

acknowledged; the work has not been published, partly or wholly anywhere as a dissertation.

NAME STUDENT IDENTITY NUMBER DATE SIGNATURE

AKATI SEYRA ICD/1094/09 ………….. ……………….

AKUAMOAH BOATENG PAUL ICD/1097/09 …………… ………………

FOSU ISAAC ICD/1319/09 …………….. ………………

OBENG YAW BERRY ICD/1513/09 …………….. ……………...

SARFO FRANCIS ICD/1585/09 …………….. ………………

NAME OF SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE DATE

MR. MUSAH MORDZEH-EKPAMPO IBRAHIM …………………. ……………...

JULY, 2013

3

DEDICATION

This piece of work is dedicated to our respective parents and guidance for their immense

support for our education. The work is also dedicated to our friends and loved ones for their

supports prayers towards successful completion of this work.

4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The group owes it profound gratitude to the Almighty God. We sought His wisdom counsel

at every stage of this research. May His name be praised.

Our sincere gratitude also goes to Mr. Musah Mordzeh-Ekpampo Ibrahim our supervisor. We

greatly appreciate his invaluable comments, suggestions, materials, assistance and pleasure of

being under his supervision. May God forever grant him divine strength and knowledge.

To Mr. Baalongbuoro Sylvinus who regardless of his busy work schedule attended to our

questionnaires and led us to other key informants who also had knowledge about our topic.

We are most grateful to him. We also acknowledge the community members of Piree for their

patience and cooperation during the survey.

Lastly, to any other person who has contributed to the success of this research, we

acknowledge you and we ask for God’s favour on you wherever you go.

5

ABSTRACT

Gender disparities have effects on women’s livelihood. Despite Ghana’s great progress in

poverty reduction, men and women in Piree still lack decent work opportunities. Piree, a

typical rural community in the Nadowli District of the Upper West Region of Ghana is of

major concern. Women in particular face greater difficulties in transforming their labour into

more productive employment activities and their paid work into higher and secure incomes,

and hence perpetuating poverty in the community. This work aims at finding the root causes

of gender disparities in labour market and income generating activities in Piree. It analyzes

the various livelihood sources, efforts of actors in gender empowerment, challenges of gender

empowerment and the effects of gender disparities in Piree. The research gathered data from

both primary and secondary sources. The main techniques employed in gathering the primary

data were; questionnaires, survey, personal observation, Focus Group Discussion, and key

informants interview. The following key findings were established;

I. Lack of commitment by the community at large as a major challenge effecting

gender equality in Piree.

II. Lack of logistics to carry out effective gender empowerment programmes.

III. Outmoded cultural beliefs and practices in Piree also inhibit gender equality.

IV. High level of illiteracy rate also facilitates gender disparities in Piree.

In the light of these challenges enumerated above, the research recommended an

effective collaboration between Nadowli District Assembly and other benevolent

NGOs in provision of logistics to carry out effective gender empowerment

programmes. Gender empowerment programmes should be approached

holistically by traditional leaders and community at large for over all benefit,

provision of scholarship packages to promote girl-child education as well as

formulation effective bye-laws to improve gender equality in Piree.

6

Table of Contents

Declaration…....………………………………………………………………………………

…i

Dedication…...……………………………………………………………………………….....

ii

Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………......i

ii

Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….

.iv

Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………v-

viii

List of tables and

figures…..………………………………………………………………......ix

List of

acronyms……………………………………………………………………………….x

CHAPTER ONE……………………………………………………………………………

….1

1.1 Background of the

study…………………………………………………………………...1

1.2 Problem statement………………………………………………………………………....3

1.3 Main Research Question…………………………………………………………………..3

1.3.1 Specific Research Questions…………………………………………………………….3

1.4 Main Research Objective. …………………………………………………………………3

1.4.1 Specific Research Objectives……………………………………………………………3

1.5 Relevance of the study…………………………………………………………………….4

1.6 Scope of the study…………………………………………………………………………4

1.7 Research Methodologies …………………………………………………………………4

1.7.0 Research Design…………………………………………………………………………4

7

1.7.1 Sampling…………………………………………………………………………………4

1.7.2 Sampling

unit…………………………………………………………………………….4

1.7.3 Sample size………………………………………………………………………………4

1.7.4 Sampling

techniques……………………………………………………………………..5

1.7.5 Secondary Sources of Data………………………………………………………………5

1.7.6 Data Collection

Methods…………………………………………………………………5

1.8 Data Analysis and

Presentation…………………………………………………………….6

1.9 Ethical

consideration……………………………………………………………………….6

CHAPTER

TWO………………………………………………………………………………..7

2.0 PROFILE OF PIREE

COMMUNITY………………………………………………………7

2.1

Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….7

2.2 Geographic

characteristics…………………………………………………………………..7

2.2.1 Environment (natural and built)

…………………………………………………………...7

2.2.2 Climate and

vegetation…………………………………………………………………….7

2.2.3

Vegetation………………………………………………………………………………..7-8

2.2.4 Soil type

……………………………………………………………………………………8

2.3.0 Demographic

characteristic………………………………………………………………...8

2.3.1 Population size, distribution and

dynamics…………………………………………………8

8

2.3.2 Household

size……………………………………………………………………………...8

2.3.3 Age

structure………………………………………………………………………………...8

2.3.4 Ethnicity and

values………………………………………………………………………8-9

2.3.5

Taboos……………………………………………………………………………………….9

2.3.6 Property ownership and inheritance

rights………………………………………………….9

2.3.7 Educational

status…………………………………………………………………………...9

2.3.8 Health status and

nutrition…………………………………………………………………..9

2.3.9 Housing

…………………………………………………………………………………….9

2.4.0 Socio-political

organization………………………………………………………………..10

2.4.1 Political participation and presentation

……………………………………………………10

2.4.2 The interrelation between the modern and traditional

institutions………………………...10

2.4.3 Gender and livelihood

Issues………………………………………………………………10

2.4.4 Gender relations in the

community………………………………………………………...11

2.4.5 Decision making

process…………………………………………………………………..11

2.5.0 Economic

characteristics…………………………………………………………………..11

2.5.1 Economic issues

…………………………………………………………………………...11

2.6

Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………...11

9

CHAPTER

THREE……………………………………………………………………………...12

3.0 LITERATURE

REVEW……………………………………………………………………..12

3.1

Introduction..…………………………………………………………………………………12

3.2

Gender………………………………………………………………………………………..12

3.2.1 Women in

Development………………………………………………………………12-14

3.2.2 Women and

Development……………………………………………………………....14-15

3.2.3 Gender and

Development………………………………………………………………….16

3.3 Gender

Disparities…………………………………………………………………………...17

3.4 Livelihood

…………………………………………………………………………………...17

3.4.1 Livelihood

Assets………………………………………………………………………….18

3.4.2 Livelihood

Strategies…………………………………………………………………18-22

3.5 Gender Roles and division of

labour……………………………………………………..23-24

3.6 Access to and control over

resources………………………………………………………..25

3.7

Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….25-26

CHAPTER

FOUR……………………………………………………………………………….27

4.0 Data Analysis and

Presentation……………………………………………………………...27

4.1

Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….27

10

4.2 Socio-demographic

Characteristics………………………………………………………….27

4.2.0 Occupation of

Respondent…………………………………………………………………27

4.2.1 Level of Education of

Respondents…………………………………………………….28-29

4.2.2

Gender……………………………………………………………………………………..29

4.3 SOURCES OF

LIVELIHOOD……………………………………………………………...30

GENDER ROLES AND DIVISION OF

LABOUR…………………………………………….31

4.5 EFFECTS OF GENDER DISPARITIES ON WOMEN’S

LIVELIHOOD…………………32

4.6 ACCESS TO AND CONTROL OVER

RESOURCES……………………………………..33

4.7 EFFORT OF ACTORS IN GENDER

EMPOWERMENT…………………………………34

4.8.0 CHALLENGES OF GENDER EMPOWERMENT IN PIREE

COMMUNITY…………35

4.8.1 Lack of commitment by the

community…………………………………………………..35

4.8.2 Inadequate

logistics………………………………………………………………………..35

4.8.3 Outmoded cultural beliefs and

practices…………………………………………………..35

4.8.4 High illiteracy

rate…………………………………………………………………………35

4.9

CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………...36

CHAPTER

FIVE………………………………………………………………………………...37

5.0

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………...37

11

5.1 Summary of

Findings………………………………………………………………………..37

5.1.0 Gender Roles and Division of

Labour…………………………………………………….37

5.1.1 Access to and Control over

Resource……………………………………………………..37

5.1.2 Livelihoods Strategies or

Activities………………………………………………………37

5.1.3 Efforts of Actors in Gender

Empowerment………………………………………………38

5.1.4 Challenges of Gender

Empowerment…………………………………………………….38

5.1.5 Effects of Gender

Disparities……………………………………………………………..38

5.2 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………38-

39

5.3 Recommendations

………………………………………………………………………….39

REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………40

-41

12

LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES

Figure 4.1 Occupational Distribution of Respondents…………………………………......27

Table 4.2 Respondents Level of Education………………………………………………28

Figure 4.2.2 Sex of Respondents…………………………………………………………...29

Figure 4.3 Bar Chart Showing the Sources of Livelihood of Respondents………………..30

Table 4.4 Gender Roles and Division of Labour…………………………………………..31

Figure 4.5 Effects of Gender Disparities on Women’s Livelihood………………………..32

Table 4.6 Access to and Control Over Resources…………………………………………33

13

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AAI - ACTION AID INTERNATIONAL

ADS- AUTOMATED DIRECTIVE SYSTEM

APA- AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

AUS AID- AUSTRALIAN AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CBO- COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATION

DFID- DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

ETC- ET CETERA

FAO- FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION

GAD- GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT

GES –GHANA EDUCATIONAL SERVICE

GSS- GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE

IFPRI- INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

IIED- INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

ILO- INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION

NGO- NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION

UK- UNITED KINGDOM

UNDP- UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

UNFPA- UNITED NATIONS FUND FOR POPULATION ACTIVITIES

USAID- UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

WAD- WOMEN AND DEVELOPMENT

WHO- WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

WID- WOMEN IN DEVELOPMENT

WVI- WORLD VISION INTERNATIONAL

14

1.0 CHAPTER ONE

1.1 Background of the study

Much more recently in 1995 and 2000, the Beijing platform for action and the

millennium development goals have both highlighted the importance of addressing

gender inequalities as a sine qua non for poverty reduction, wealth creation and

sustainable development. The traditional restriction of women’s control over land has

generated public resistance in some countries against any attempt by women to assess

their rights in ways that challenge customary land tenure system (World Conference on

Women, Beijing, September 4-15, 1995).

Most of the world’s poor are women. Of the 1.3 billion people living on less than U.S $1

a day, 70% are women (UNDP, 1995). Women are at the forefront in meeting the basic

needs of their families as well as being responsible for subsistence food production and

income generation. Women produce at least 80% of all food crops in Sub- Saharan

Africa, 70% - 80% in South- Asia and 50% in Latin America and Caribbean (UNDP,

1995).

In the context of Africa development, access to land and other resources are key to

basic livelihoods and therefore a question of Fundamental Human Rights. The domination

of agriculture in most African economies suggests the importance of land as a basic tool

of development and a significant determinant of income earning power. A World Bank

study pointed out that, women are the core of the economies of Sub-Sahara Africa

comprising about 60% of the informal sector and providing about 70% of total

agricultural labour (Blackden and Bhanu, 1998). Statistical data for Ghana show that

women account for about half of the agricultural labour force and produce around 70% of

Ghana’s food crops (Gender and Agricultural Development Strategy, 2001). The World

Bank study continues to state that women are the principal agricultural workers and food

producers and are primarily responsible for ensuring food availability in the family.

However, their central position in the economic production, attaining food security goals

and meeting family nutritional needs contrasts with the systematic discrimination they

face in realizing the country’s economic growth potentials. Experts believe that,

economies will grow faster and countries will become less poor if gender-based

inequality is substantially reduced or eliminated.

15

Assessing gender disparities on rural livelihoods has been a core priority of

governments for many decades to improve the welfare of rural populations and increase

the productivity and value added from agriculture and other economic activities in rural

areas.

Within the clear division of labour, typical of Ghanaian rural communities, women

trade-off between non-productive and productive roles, child bearing and rearing

responsibilities are considered non-productive roles including the domestic task that

guarantee the reproduction of the labour force. Women’s productive roles comprise both

production for the market and subsistence or home working as independent farmers and

wage workers (Duncan and Brants, 2004). Kotey and Tsikata (1998) have argued that

discussions revolving around agricultural productivity are best explained through a land

rights analysis using a social relation’s approach. The “gender perspective” approach used

by the World Bank to analyze growth and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa recognizes that

women stand at the crossroads between production and reproduction, between economic

activities and the care of human beings, and therefore between economic growth and

human development. Such an approach takes account of existing discriminatory, unequal

and inequitable (power) relationships and practices, and lays the basis for more

sustainable development based on legal and social justice. It also provides room for a

broader view of social groups. The relatively weaker position of women results in a

vulnerability which is further impacted upon by rural-urban migration. Afshar (2003;15)

contends that, the inadequacy of agricultural income, coupled with poverty in rural areas,

have pushed many people out of their villages in search for better sources of livelihood in

the urban centres.

Piree, which is located at the South- Western part of the Nadowli District in Upper West

Region has been examined to ascertain gender disparities in the community.

16

1.2 Problem statement.

Gender disparities are prevalent in most Ghanaian rural societies. These have effects on

women’s livelihood. There is discrimination in terms of resource allocation as well as

unequal access to all the livelihood strategies (agriculture, livelihood diversification and

migration) among males and females on rural livelihood. This has made rural women to face

greater difficulties in transforming their labour into more productive employment activities

and their paid work into higher and more secure incomes. Additionally, community traditions

continue to leave women without land and other resources after their husband dies. This

continues to limit women’s ability to increase their productivity since they have no claim

over such resources. More effectively, gender disparities have decrease women’s capability

to realise their rights, determine their life outcomes, and influence decision making in

households and in the community. No wonder poverty is high among women in Piree in the

Upper West Region of Ghana. Hence there is the need for the group to research into the

social relation, institutional arrangement, cultural relation, gender relation as well as position

in the community.

1.3 Main Research Question.

What are the effects of gender disparities on women’s livelihoods in Piree?

1.3.1 Specific Research Questions.

A) What are the various livelihood sources in the community?

B) What are the gender roles and division of labour within households in the community?

C) Do gender disparities enhance or hamper the economic livelihood of households?

D) Who control or have access to the resources own in the community

1.4 Main Research Objective.

The main objective is to assess gender disparities on women’s livelihoods in the community

1.4.1 Specific Research Objectives

The specific research objectives are:

A) To identify the various livelihood sources in the community.

B) To examine gender roles and division of labour within households in the community.

C) To identify the effects of gender disparities on the economic livelihood of households.

D) To identify controllers of resources used and owned in the community.

17

1.5 Relevance of the study

Gender disparity is a major development challenge in Nadowli-district. This deserves not

only the attention of the district assembly and gender activists but also concerns of corporate

organisations and individuals to minimise the high level of gender disparities on rural

livelihoods. This is because gender disparities have decrease women’s capabilities to realise

their rights, determine their life outcomes and influence decision-making in households and

the community. The study therefore intends to explore appropriate strategies and

recommendations in limiting the issue of gender disparities on women’s livelihoods. Despite

the immensity of the problem, very little research on gender disparities has been carried out

in the district. The study will serve as reference point to the district assembly and other

gender activists as far as the issue of gender disparities is concerned. In this case, it will give

them an in-depth understanding of what gender disparities are and the strategies to tackle the

problems. Additionally, the study could also be used as a literature review.

1.6 Scope of the study.

This particular research targets community members engaged in the various livelihood

strategies in Piree community in the Nadowli-District in the Upper-West Region of Ghana.

1.7 Research Methodologies

1.7.0 Research Design

Giving the overall objective of the study, which is to assess the effects of gender disparities

on women’s livelihoods in Piree, we employed both qualitative and quantitative methods.

1.7.1 Sampling

This is the process of choosing the units of the target population to make up the sample. This

was done by selecting the sample units from the population of 576. This was numbered

serially, mixed up and randomly selected until sample units of 50 are obtained.

1.7.2 Sampling unit

This is either a single member or collection of members subject to data analysis in the

sample. This comprised of selected households in the area, therefore the sample units was the

people contacted.

1.7.3 Sample size

It is the exact number of units in the sample. Sample size of 50 was taken out of 82

households of a total population of 576.

18

1.7.4 Sampling techniques

Probability and non-probability sampling techniques was used to select respondents for

interviews.

Probability sampling – It is where each and every unit within the population is given an

equal chance of being selected.

Simple random sampling – This refers to the sampling method that has the following

properties; population (N) objects, sample consists of (n) objects and all possible samples of

(n) objects are equally likely to occur. The following procedures was used in simple random

sampling;

Number of elements or sample units of the population were identified. Sample size (n) was

determined from random selection.

Non-probability sampling – This is where the researcher decides to take what he thinks is

the representative unit of the group, hence not all the elements of the group are given an equal

chance of being selected.

Purposive sampling techniques - As the name implies, the researcher, adhering to the

objectives of the study, select key informants for interviews because they have special

knowledge about gender and livelihoods and could help get adequate information. This was

used to collect information from the Nadowli District Assembly.

1.7.5 Secondary Sources of Data

Information was obtained from the District Assembly, Books, Journals, Magazines, and

Newsletters etc. to validate the report.

1.7.6 Data Collection Methods

1) Personal observation – It is a method of data collection whereby the researcher goes to

the field personally to observe the situation in order to find answers to his research questions.

This was used in undertaking thorough observation and inspections of the general

environment and various gender relational issues in the community.

2) Interviews – This is a person - to - person interactions between two or more individuals

with a specific purpose in mind. It is a method of field investigation whereby the researcher

meets his respondents and through the interaction he asks specific questions to find answers

to his research problems. This was used to obtain first-hand information from the target group

such as the Chief, the Assemblyman, the Nadowli District Assembly, unit committee

19

chairman and gender activists in the district. This is because these people have information

about the topic.

3) Key Informants – This method was used to identify people who have in-depth knowledge

about the topic.

4) Focus Group Discussion- It is a method of data collection whereby the researcher selects

groups of his interest about the topic. This was used to collect data from interest groups in

gender and livelihoods in the community such as, the District Assembly, Women’s Group

etc.

5) Questionnaire – It is a method of data collection where formal questions can be framed

and written by the researcher for the respondents to provide the relevant answers. Fifty (50)

questionnaires was used for quantitative data collection which involved a sample of

households.

1.8 Data Analysis and Presentation

- Both qualitative and quantitative data analyzed and presented.

Qualitative Data Analysis

The qualitative data analysis was employed and presented by the use of descriptive,

explanatory and exploratory techniques. This was used to explain the efforts of gender

activist, effect of gender disparities etc.

The quantitative data analysis was also be used and presented in the form of tables, bar and

pie charts. This was used to analyze occupational distribution, level of education, sex of

respondents.

1.9 Ethical consideration

Community members were ensured of confidentiality of information given out.

20

CHAPTER TWO

2.0 PROFILE OF PIREE COMMUNITY

2.1 Introduction

This chapter focuses on the profile of the study area in terms of the geo-physical setting,

including the location, rainfall pattern and relief. It also describes the socio-demographic

features of the area, socio-political organization, the economic activities undertaking as well

as socio-cultural issues and how this relate to gender disparities and its impact on rural

livelihood in Piree community.

2.2 Geographic characteristics

The community of study, Piree is located in the Nadowli district. It is bounded to the north

with Gbanko, to the south Sombo, to the east with Kanga and to the west by Duong.

2.2.1 Environment (natural and built)

The natural environment has seen alteration in the areas of farmlands, grazing land, bush

burning, cutting of trees for fire wood, and other practices. This generally impact negatively

on the natural environment. Due to the nature of the environment alteration, both men and

women are involved in various livelihood strategies and not only on agriculture.

2.2.2 Climate and vegetation

The climate characteristics in the community indicate that the climate is the normal Tropical

Continental type. The Nadowli district and Piree as community have a mean monthly

temperature ranging from 36°c in March and 27°c in August. Annual rainfall is confined to

six months that is to September and unevenly distributed. Mean annual rainfall is

about110mm with its peak around August. Between October and March, there is virtually no

rain and this long dry season is made harsh by drought. (Source: Nadowli District Assembly

and field survey) Harmattan Winds; the harmattan periods is characterized by a drowsy

weather causing a reduction in the number of working days of farmers, unsustainable

livelihood, minimizing the standard of living and placing heavy burden on women.

2.2.3 Vegetation

Piree community lies within the Tropical continental or guinea savanna wood land

characterized by shrubs and grassland with scattered medium sized place. Some economic

trees found in the community are; Kakok, Shea, Baobab, mango and dawadawa which are

resistance to both fire and drought. (Source: Nadowli District Assembly and Group field

survey 2013)

21

2.2.4 Soil type

Soil sample examined and identified in Piree are sand, and sandy-loamy (savanna ochrosols).

They generally are known to be poor in organic matter and nutrients as a result of absence of

serious vegetative cover due to the burning by both farmers and intense sunshine, over

grazing by cattle, over cultivation and protracted erosion. Despite the nature of the soil, crops

like millet, beans, groundnut, rice, cowpea, maize, guinea corn, and Bambara beans are

cultivated. (Source: Group field survey 2013)

2.3.0 Demographic characteristic

2.3.1 Population size, distribution and dynamics

The total population of Piree is 576, of which 325 are females and 251 males representing

44% and 56% respectively (Source: Group field survey 2013).

2.3.2 Household size

Each household constitutes about seven (7) people

2.3.3 Age structure

Past population records of the community suggest a sharp dominance by the youth over the

aged and females over males. In relation of the above issue, most females do not have

adequate access to livelihood strategies due to gender disparities/ discrimination. The group

report of the area indicates that the economically active age group (15-64) constitutes

approximately 47% as against 53% for the economically dependent (0-14 and 65+). This

suggest high dependency ratio and make it difficult for the economically active age group.

2.3.4 Ethnicity and values

Piree is combined with strongly patriarchal family structures, women’s lack of influence

in decision making, and the history of male out-migration which has tended to increase

women’s labour burden, this result in the generally more limited options of women in Piree.

Piree is a mono ethnic community mainly of Dagaate with few migrants. The people of Piree

community practice the extended family system and also the patrilineal system of inheritance

values.

Values are rural prestige which a group of people adhere to. Some of the values of Piree are;

respect for elders, recognition of kin group, obedience, kinship system and many more.

22

2.3.5 Taboos

Just as every society is governed by rules and regulation, which serve as checks and balances

on immoral behaviour, so applies to the people of Piree. According to the chief and his

council of elders, the people of Piree do not kill snake, and also hold the porcupine and

hedgehog as a sacred animals and it is a taboo to eat these animals.

2.3.6 Property ownership and inheritance rights

Among the people of Piree, property such as land is owned by the community and controlled

by chiefs and family heads. However, farms and animals such as fowl, cattle, sheep, goats,

and pigs are owned individually. Land and family wealth is inherited by sons in order of birth

right.

2.3.7 Educational status

During the field survey it was revealed that about 272 of the population are literates and 206

are illiterates. This indicates that the literacy level exceeds the illiteracy level

2.3.8 Health status and nutrition

Piree community has no health center but rather go to Sombo health centre to seek for

medical attention. Information from the health center revealed that, there is only ward for

both male and female which is the detention room. According to the report from the health

center, Malaria is the commonest disease recorded followed by septic wounds; emergency

case like accident and burns. Most of the people are not able to go to the health center for

treatment and they do consult each other for medical herbs for treatment. Complicated cases

are quickly transferred to the nearest hospital in Nadowli. The trained traditional birth

attendance also helps in delivery or labour cases.

2.3.9 Housing

The people of Piree practice extended family system. Compound houses are mostly

common with facilities such as kitchen, bathroom and barns for storing farm produce. The

settlement is generally dispersed or scattered. Most of these houses are mud houses with zinc

roofing, plastered with cow dung which serves as resistance against rain water. Few block

houses also exist and are plastered with cement.

23

2.4.0 Socio-political organisation

2.4.1 Political participation and presentation

Women in Piree community are effectively under the control or authority of men (initially

their father or other male members of their kin group and later their husband) for much of

their lives, although they may gain in-status and influence with age. As result, women’s

decision making role in Piree is constrained in both private and public spheres, markedly, so

in the Northern Region at large.

However, recent exercises in decentralizing the establishment of a new multi-party

constitution and general elections, provides opportunities for women to participate more

actively in the formal political process, but there is little evidence as yet to show clearly that

this has occurred.

2.4.2 The interrelation between the modern and traditional institutions

There is a cordial relationship between the traditional and the modern political institutions in

Piree community. The traditional authority carries decision in the community in consultation

with the modern political authorities. Any developmental plan from the government for

implementation in the community is channeled via the modern political system and reaches

the traditional institutions before implemented. The traditional institutions also assist the

modern political institutions by the provision of some portion of land for developmental work

to be undertaken in the community.

2.4.3 Gender and livelihood Issues

Gender is simply defined as the roles, responsibilities, rights and relationship that are

ascribed to both men and women in a society. Ghana’s ethnic, cultural and agro-ecological

diversity makes generalization about gender relation and their consequences for women’s

access resource, decision making and status extremely difficult. Divergence of experiences

has been further widened by regionally distorted historical development and biased

development policies.

Livelihood encompasses the capabilities, assets and the activities that people combined and

embark on to make a living. The household who live in the rural areas of Northern Ghana

base their subsistence on natural resource which are threatened by the progressive

diversification and increase frequency of extreme weather events in the region.

24

2.4.4 Gender relations in the community

Responsibilities are unequally distributed among males and females. During decision making

for the community, issues not relating to women are not made known to women.

(Source: Group field survey 2013).

2.4.5 Decision making process

At the community level, decision is taken by the chief and his elders. The chief meets his

elders to make a final decision. The assemblyman only comes in when the issue is meant for

the assembly. Also at the household level, family heads are considered to have the final say in

decision making, information that are not related to women are not disseminated to women.

The gong-gong beater beats to summon the people for information.

2.5.0 Economic characteristics

2.5.1 Economic issues

Women’s labour particular rates are generally high throughout the community. The most

streaking feature, however, is that about 99% of women are self-employed or work as unpaid

labour in agriculture, agro-based enterprises, and commerce or small scale manufacturing in

the informal sector activities with low productivity which an average yield low incomes. In

the agricultural sector, the majority of women are food producers. The nature of women’s

involvement in food production also differs from men’s in terms of division of labour and

end use of productions, with men producing more the market.

2.6 Conclusion

A profile of the community with respect to the physical, demographic, socio-economic and

political aspects is looked at in relation to the study. The peaceful co-existence of traditional

political system with government and NGOs alike are clear potentials in the community

which could be of use.

25

CHAPTER THREE

3.0 LITERATURE REVEW

3.1 Introduction:

This chapter explores relevant literature about the topic more specifically on the effects of

gender disparities on women’s livelihood, social relation, institutional arrangements, cultural

relations, gender relations and positions in the community. According to Brown (1996), the

essence of literature review is to guide the researcher to expose him or her to various works

on the topic.

3.2 Gender

The term gender has been defined by various authors. Gender refers to the arrays of socially

constructed roles and relationships, personality traits, attitudes, behaviours, values and

relative power and influence that society ascribes to the two sexes on a differential basis

(USAID ADS Chapters 200-203). Gender is an acquired identity that is learned, changes

overtime and varies widely within and across cultures (USAID ADS Chapters 200-203).

Gender is relational and refers not simply to women or men but to the relationship between

them.

According to American Psychological Association (2011), gender refers to the attitudes,

feelings and behaviours that a given culture associate with a person’s biological sex. Hazel

Reeves and Sally Baden (2000), defined gender as the socially determined ideas and practices

of what it is to be female or male. World Health Organization (2001), also defined

gender as the economic, social and cultural attribute and opportunities associated with being

male or female at a particular point in time. Gender therefore is the roles, responsibilities,

rights and relationship ascribe to men and women in a given society.

3.2.1 Women in Development

The term “Women in development” was coined in the early 1970s by Washington-based

network of female development professionals (Tinker, 1990:30). On the basis of their own

experiences in overseas missions they began to challenge “trickle down” theories of

development, arguing that modernization was impacting differently on men and women. The

WID perspective is closely linked with the dominant modernization paradigm of the 1950s

through the 1970s, which decreed that modernization, usually equated with industrialization,

would uplift the standard of living of developing countries (Harding, 1986; Chowdhury,

1995). By the 1970s however, this view of modernization was being questioned by many

researchers (Momsen & Kinaird, 1993; Mikell, 1997). It was being argued that the relative

26

position of women had, in fact, improved very little over the previous two decades. Under the

rubric of WID, the recognition that women’s experience of development and societal change

differed from that of men became institutionalized (Nuket, 1991; Harcourt, 1994). It was now

legitimate for research to focus specifically on women’s experiences and perceptions.

Although feminist researchers and development agencies acknowledged the contributions of

WID, nonetheless the approach was based on several assumptions at odds with critical trends

in social sciences research in the 1970s (Rathgeber, 1992).

Gardner & Lewis (1996), assert that WID was ahistorical, as it tended to focus on sex and

overlooked the impact of gender, race and class issues. The authors maintain that WID

policies simply reproduced ethnocentric assumptions about the nature of gender and women’s

subordination, thus accepting existing social structures. Jackson & Pearson (1998), argue that

rather than examine why women fared less well, WID focused only on how women could be

integrated into ongoing development initiatives. This non-confrontational approach avoided

questioning the sources and nature of women’s subordination and oppression, and focused

instead on advocacy for more equal participation in projects.

Buvinic et al. (1983), argue that WID tends to focus exclusively on women’s productive

work, thereby ignoring or minimizing the reproductive side of women’s lives. The authors

further contend that as a result of this perspective, WID projects mainly had a goal of income

generation. Meanwhile, once these income-generating projects become successful, they tend

to be appropriated by men. Chao (1999), asserts that WID still most basically remains an

“add-on” to mainstream development policy and practice; hence the commitment to gender

policy only rarely becomes gender-sensitive practice. It can, therefore, be said that the WID

approach failed to challenge prevailing development models. Its focus on paid employment

for women did not take into consideration the enormous amount of unpaid work women are

already performing (Ahooja-Patel, 1995; Chao, 1999). Additionally, its top-down

interventions, focusing on women and not taking into account their male counterparts tended

to create problems especially within the domestic sphere (Snyder & Tadesse, 1995; Klasen,

2005).

The general notion of focusing on women separate from men in some development projects

has been accepted by a considerable number of governments of developing countries and

international development agencies (Desai & Potter, 2002). However, to some extent this

reflects political expediency and should not be interpreted as a sign of fundamental

commitment to the liberation of women. According to Brydon & Chant, (1989), the failure of

27

WID to include women’s perspective in planning and policymaking resulted in women’s

marginalization in development.

The WID approach achieved a great deal in creating awareness on the status of women, but

much less in terms of concrete achievements in improving their situation (Momsen, 1991).

The WID approach offers little defense against this reality, because it does not challenge the

basic social relations of gender. It assumes that gender relations will change, as women

become full economic partners in development. The limitations of WID, led to the emergence

of the WAD approach in the second half of the 1970s.

3.2.2 Women and Development

According to Kishor (2005), gender differences in power, roles and rights affect health,

fertility control, survival and nutrition through women’s access to health care, lower control

over their bodies and sexuality, and restrictions in material and material resources. (Almaz,

1991; Hirut, 2004; Mukuria et al, 2005), studies indicated the low status of women

indeveloping countries in general, Lack of access to productive resources such as land, lack

of access to education, employment opportunities, basic health services, and protection of

basic human rights; low decision making; violence and harmful traditional practices are some

of the indicators of the socio-economic marginalization of women in the country.

Feminist scholars and activists from the Third World were displeased with WID (Kabeer,

1991; Yeboah, 1998). They argued that the development model that was being followed

lacked the perspective of developing countries, and proposed Women and Development

WAD focuses on the relationship between women and the development process, rather than

purely on strategies to integrate women into development (Bridge, 1994). The WAD

approach recognizes that women have always been important economic actors in their

various societies (Beneria, 1995). The WAD approach is very important, partly because of its

concern for efficiency under the neo-liberal paradigm. Its starting point is that it is a waste of

resources, and inefficient to keep women out of the development process (Jackson &

Pearson, 1998; Desai & Potter, 2002).

WAD also recognizes that Third World men who lack elite status have also been adversely

affected by the structure of inequalities in the international systems (Bortei-Doku, 1991).

However, the approach gives little analytical attention to social relations of gender within

classes (Visvanathan et al, 1997). Consequently, the question of gender and cross-gender

28

alliances and divisions within classes is not systematically addressed. Rathgeber (1992)

argues that, at a theoretical level, WAD recognizes class, but in practical project design and

implementation, it tends, like WID, to group women together without taking note of class,

race and cultural divisions, all of which may exercise powerful influence on actual social

status.

The approach implicitly assumes that women’s position will improve, if and when

international structures become equitable (Gordon, 1996). It is evident that the under-

representation of women in economic, political and social structures is still identified

primarily as a problem. However, it is argued that this problem can be solved by carefully

designed intervention strategies rather than more fundamental shifts in gender and social

relations.

Not surprisingly, many projects designed to support women using this approach have not

yielded the anticipated results (Dagenais & Piche, 1994). One of the major reasons is that few

of these projects have recognized that entrance into the wage economy does not reduce the

time women spend on their household responsibilities of (Gardner & Lewis, 1996). In rural

areas in Ghana particularly, women work an average 10-15 hours per day, a minimum of 70

hours per week (Mikell, 1997).

This approach, therefore, relies on the elasticity of women’s time without regard for the fact

that the cost to women in terms of the demand made on their time and energy may be

intolerable (Ardayfio-Schandorf, 1993).

WAD also focuses on income-generating activities and tends to underplay the unproductive

labor of women and the need to invest in family and household maintenance (Haddad, 1991).

Although this approach has a variety of flaws, one benefit is that it provides an insight into

the fact that “basic” needs which are usually neglected in households due to inadequate

financial resources, can be met through informal income-generating activities of women

(Gardner & Lewis, 1996). Having said that it is, however, clear that this approach has not

yielded the desired development result of gender equity. Its limitations paved the way for a

new approach, known as gender and development.

3.2.3 Gender and Development

According to USAID (ADS chapters 200-203), Gender and development shifts the focus

from women as a group to the socially determined relations between women and men.

Gender and Development approaches focus on the social, economic, political and cultural

forces that determine how men and women might participate in, benefit from, and control

29

project resources and activities differently. The Gender and Development is based on the

premise that development cooperation programmes cannot succeed or the impact being

sustained if the people affected do not support them, (Aus AIDs). GAD assumes a holistic

perspective of social organization and builds upon socially defined and constructed roles of

men and women (Afshar, 1991). Unlike sex, which is biologically determined, gender roles

are socially constructed and change from socio-cultural context to another and across time

(Buvinic et al. 1983) The GAD approach is the only one that considers the larger context of

development policy as an issue (Beneria, 1995).

According to Brydon & Chant (1989), the objective of the GAD approach was to remove

gender disparities in social, economic and political sectors, and to create a balance between

men and women as a prerequisite for achieving sustainable development. GAD has its roots

in feminist anthropology concerned with 121 cross-cultural and intra-cultural differences,

and in socialist feminism where class and gender links are considered, but it has also been

influenced by postmodern feminism with its discourse about knowledge, power relations and

differences (Jackson & Pearson, 1998). Postmodern feminists criticize the dualistic language

of binary oppositions which create women, and in particular Third World women, as the

vulnerable “other.” Instead, they advocate for a localized and contextualized examination of

women’s concrete and lived experiences in different cultures (Parpart, 1995). Women are not

a homogenous group, as is the tendency in the WAD approach on focusing on the general

category “women”, but divided by age, class, ethnicity, race, and nationality and so on,

according to advocates of GAD (Elson, 1995). Hence, the weakness of WAD in focusing

exclusively on women is replaced by the GAD perspective, which puts an emphasis on the

totality of the interconnectivity between women’s and men’s lives (Young, 1993).

Gender and development moves away from practice of adding “women only” component to

project and programme which characterized the Women in Development approach.

3.3 Gender Disparities

The term gender disparities have been conceptualized by various authors. On one level

gender disparity can be normally defined as the purely descriptive observation of different

outcomes between males and females. However, to move beyond the descriptive level is to

ask what might cause gender disparities reaches into the complex interplay of the possible

sources. Discrimination( the differential treatment of individuals because of their gender,

30

biological differences, individuals and societal beliefs and attitudes about appropriate gender-

specific roles and the choices of the individual and households based on all of these factors

(and more such as an individual’s own circumstances) all play a role in determining gender

disparities( Filmmer, King and Pritchett, 1998).

Reeves and Baden (2000), defined gender disparities as the systematic, unfavorable treatment

of individuals on the basis of their gender, which denies them rights, opportunities or

resources. The difference in power relations between men and women result in gender roles,

social roles and socially appropriate characteristics and behaviours. All are culture specific.

Kabira and Masinjila (1997), identified action, locus, visualization and power, among other

things as components in the identification of different roles of men and women.

One of the disparities between males and females is related to the difference in their

employment status which is manifested by occupational segregation, gender based wage gaps

and women’ disproportionate representation in informal employment on paid work and

higher unemployment rate (UNFPA, 2005).

3.4 Livelihood

A variety of definitions have been given about livelihood. Chambers (1995) as cited in

Scoones (2009), livelihood is the means of gaining living or a combination of resources used

and the activities undertaken in order to live. He continued to portray livelihood as a complex

web of activities and interactions that emphasizes the diversity of ways people make a living.

Chambers and Conway (1992) stated; a livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets

(including both material and social resources) and activities for a means of living. A

livelihood is defined as the activities, the assets and access that jointly determine the living

gained by an individual or household (Ellis, 1999).

3.4.1 Livelihood Assets

According to Scoones (1998), the ability to pursue different livelihood strategies is dependent

on the basic material and social, tangible and intangible assets that people have in their

possession. Drawing on an economic metaphor, such livelihood resources may be seen as the

“capital” base from which different productive streams are derive from which livelihoods are

constructed. Scoones (1998) identified four (4) different types of capital.

31

I. Natural Capital- the natural resources stock, soil, water, air, genetic resources, etc) and

environmental services( hydrological cycle, pollution sinks, etc) from which resource

flow and services useful for livelihoods are derived.

II. Economic or Financial Capital- the capital base cash, credit/debt, savings and other

economic assets, including basic infrastructure and production equipment and

technologies) which are essential for the persuit of any livelihood strategy

III. Human Capital- the skills, knowledge, ability to labour and good health and physical

capability important for the successful persuit of different livelihood strategies.

IV. Social Capital- the social resources (networks, social claims, social relations,

affiliations, associations upon which people draw when persuing different livelihood

strategies requiring coordinated actions.

3.4.2 Livelihood Strategies

Three broad clusters of livelihood strategies are identified as indicated by Scoones (1998).

These are; Agriculture, Livelihood Diversification and Migration. Broadly these are seen to

cover the range of options open to rural people. Either they gain more of their livelihood from

Agriculture ( including livestock rearing, acqua culture, forestry etc) through process of

intensification ( more output per unit area through capital investment or increase in labour

input) or extensification (more land under cultivation) or they diversify to a range of off-farm

income earning activities, or they move away and seek a livelihood, either temporary or

permanently elsewhere or, more commonly, they persue a combination of strategies together

or sequence.

Livelihood Sequencing- Rural households earn income from diverse allocations of their

natural, physical and human capital assets among various income generating activities (Ellis

1998). The literature offers many reasons why such diversification occurs. Among these

might be diminishing returns on increasing investment in certain activities, synergies

(economies of scope) among distinct activities, or the lack of markets, which compel self-

provision of goods or services the household desires for own consumption (Barrett et al.

2001). Similarly, households may wish to diversify as a strategy for coping with an

unexpected shock, or to minimize risk ex ante by participating in activities that generate other

incomes. The presumption throughout the literature is that households choose such patterns

of diversification so as to achieve the best possible standard of living. The chosen

32

combination of assets and activities is often referred to as the household’s ‘livelihood

strategy’. A livelihood strategy encompasses not only activities that generate income, but

many other kinds of choices, including cultural and social choices, that come together to

make up the primary occupation of a household (Ellis 1998).

The concept of a livelihood strategy has become central to development practice in recent

years. Nonetheless, given the uncountable possible proportional mixes of activities

undertaken by a household, it is not always clear what constitutes a distinct livelihood rather

than just a slightly different mix of activities within the same general livelihood (de Haan,

2000; IIED, 2004). A precise operational definition of livelihood remains elusive, as does an

associated method for identifying livelihoods in quantitative data (Ahn, 2003). This probably

helps explain why the more quantitative development scholars (e.g. economists) have been

slower to adopt the concept than have the more qualitative ones (e.g. anthropologists and

sociologists).

The ability to operationalize the concept of a livelihood strategy becomes especially

important when one speaks of ‘improving’ livelihood to paraphrase much current

development discourse (Hugo et al, 2001). Implicit in the concept of ‘improvement’ is the

suggestion that certain strategies offer households a higher return on their assets, not least of

which is household labor migration (de Haan, 2000). Thus approach is quite important in

choosing distinct livelihood strategies that earn high returns for households, especially in

rural agricultural areas.

Agriculture- A wide variety of literature is available on the importance of agriculture to

economic development in Ghana, and on the critical role that rural women play within this

sector (Awumbila & Momsen, 1995; Mikell, 1997; FAO, 2000). In Ghana, the backbone of

the rural communities is the small scale farmer, the majority of who are women (Ardayfio-

Schandorf & Awumbila, 2000). Women play a major role in agriculture, which includes

farming, fisheries, forestry and livestock production (Benneh et al., 1996). They play a lead

role in post-harvest activities such as shelling of grains, storage, processing and marketing

(Ameyibor, 1993). Women are also becoming increasingly visible in farm tasks which

traditionally have been designated as male preserves, thus breaking ground in typical male

dominated areas such as land clearance and growth of cash crops (Goldstein and Urdry,

2002)

The inclusion of women in decision-making structures does not necessarily lead to

positive changes in gender relationships. But gender analysts have shown how their

33

involvement in all structures and levels of decision-making is a necessary condition for

empowerment, emancipation and transformation (Kabeer, 1994; Moser, 1993). Women,

therefore, remain the centre-piece of food security and hold the key to a sound and healthy

economy.

In spite of the central role of women in agriculture, they remain the most disadvantaged

population in Ghana. Women have much more limited access to resources than their male

counterparts (Boserup, E. 1970). This is dominant in areas of education, land, agricultural

extension, and access to credit, all of which combine to restrain the ability to increase their

productivity and incomes (Awusabo-Asare, 1990). These women are the last to benefit from,

or in some cases, have been negatively affected by prevailing economic growth and

development processes. Gender bias and gender blindness still persist in the agricultural

sector. For example, agricultural research and investment has been focused on cash crop

activities of men. Additionally, farmers are still generally perceived as “male” by policy-

makers and development agencies (Swindell, 1985). Women farmers also suffer lack of

recognition because their area of operation falls within the informal sector of the economy,

which is largely associated with unskilled and unprofessional tasks (FAO, 2000).

Within the informal sector, women farmers suffer from distinctions which are made between

areas of “income generation” and sectors which are more passive in nature (Awumbila,

1997). Compared to men, women do not have unconditional access to the means of

production. They face the problem of insecurity of tenure in land distribution arrangements

especially in situations where they farm in joint partnership with their husbands (Mikell,

1997). Formal sources of credit are difficult to obtain by rural women because of banking

restrictions, bureaucracy and distances involved in obtaining loans from the bank. According

to Jackson & Pearson (1998), women are more likely to be poor than men, particularly in

societies where men have considerable control over women’s work time, as is the case in

Ghana.

Due to the lack of access to productive resources, Ghanaian women farmers constitute the

poorest among the poor, and their conditions are worsened by the existing differentials in

rural and urban development (Ardayfio-Schandorf, 1994). The current poverty profile of

Ghana has shown that the percentage of the Ghanaian population defined as poor has fallen

from 52% in 1991-1992 to just fewer than 40% in 1998-1999 (GSS, 2000b). The decline,

however, is not evenly distributed geographically. Poverty reductions are concentrated in

Accra and both rural and urban forest localities. In both years, poverty is substantially higher

in other rural areas, including the Volta region, than urban areas, so that poverty in Ghana

34

remains a disproportionately rural phenomenon (GS, 2002a). The literature reveals that

besides Ghana’s poverty and trends in poverty also relate to the economic activities in which

households are engaged.

Migration- Migration is generally defined as the spatial mobility of people between one

geographical location and another, generally involving a change of residence from a place of

origin to a place of destination. It is a difficult concept to define because it includes people

who move for different reasons across different spaces. A migrant can be a person who

moves to another city or town within a nation; a refugee who crosses an international border

to escape religious or political persecution; a jobseeker who moves to another country for

better economic opportunity.

Migration is one of the major components of population change, and has been an integral part

of livelihood diversification across many developing countries for at least the last century

(Agesa & Agesa, 1999:12). However, over time, and in different places, it has taken a

number of different forms. This process has included internal, regional and international

movements, exists in widely different demographic contexts and cuts across class and skill

boundaries, and (Drinkwater & Rusinow, 1999:5; Dang et al, 2003:14). 36 47

With a few exceptions, evidence in the literature suggests that internal population movements

are increasing. For example, close to 120 million people in China were estimated to have

migrated internally in 2001, against 458,000 people migrating internationally for work (Zhao,

2003). Again in China, rural-urban migration has overtaken other kinds of movements in

recent years as a result of increased manufacturing industries (Zhao, 2003). In Bangladesh

two-thirds of all migration is from rural to urban areas and is increasing rapidly (Afshar,

2003). Rural-urban migration is also an important source of livelihood diversification in Sub-

Sahara Africa, to which the study now turns (Bryceson et al., 2003).

West Africa is an area with particularly long traditions of population mobility. Trade between

localities and regions is a well-established economic strategy in West Africa that was fully

developed long before colonial boundaries were drawn. As a result, the peoples of West

Africa have a strong affinity for traveling (Kasanga & Avis, 1988). In discussing trade within

West Africa, Clapperton (1929) describes the presence in the town of Kaiama of “a caravan

consisting of upward of 1000 men and women, and as many beasts of burden on their way

back to Hausaland after a long trading trip to Gonja and Ashanti.” (Cited in Boahen,

1966:105). These trans-Saharan caravan routes are therefore, among the earliest evidence of

35

major interaction between West and North Africa for trading and exchange of scholars

(Kasanga & Avis, 1988).

According to Anarfi et al. (2001), interregional trade within the West African region dates

back to a period before colonization. The authors assert that during this period, trade

activities stimulated flows of traders from neighbouring territories who brought kola nuts,

ivory, sheep, cattle, hides of wild animals and clothes to Salaga market. Thus, pre-colonial

migration in West Africa was basically oriented toward trade, labor, agriculture, and to a

lesser extent religion, and these occurred without legal restraints and barriers (Adepoju,

2000). The absence of strict or legal boundary restrictions made it possible for nomads, farm

workers, seamen, traders, and preachers alike to migrate freely and frequently across

international borders, even during the pre-colonial era.

An important fact that emerges from the migration literature on West Africa is that

population movements in the pre-colonial era were associated largely with the prevailing

economic, socio-political and ecological conditions, especially the search for farm land and

trade, as well as warfare and slavery (Adepoju, 1995a). Migration formed an integral part of

the social fabric. It has, therefore, been suggested that the contemporary phenomenon of out-

migration from the rural areas of West Africa may represent a continuation of earlier

migratory movements (Kasanga & Avis, 1988).

3.5 Gender Roles and division of labour

Men and women perform multiple roles in society, as both are involved in i) reproductive

activities, ii) productive activities, iii) community management activities, and iv) community

politics. Women, however, generally spend less time on productive activities and community

politics in comparison to men due to their heavy daily workload. While men are able to focus

principally on their productive tasks and carry out their other activities sequentially, women

are often obliged to carry out a large number of tasks, especially reproductive tasks,

simultaneously and dispersed over the day. Thus, women’s productive time and flexibility are

much more constrained compared to men, often leading to trade-offs between their non-

productive and productive roles (Moser, 1993).

A clear division of labour according to sex and age exists in Ghanaian farming communities

in terms of tasks performed and their participation in different farming activities. Women are

more involved in farming activities such as planting, weeding, watering, harvesting, the

36

transportation of farm produce, agro-processing and the marketing of small amounts of farm

produce, whereas men are more involved in the initial clearing of the land, the tilling of the

soils and the marketing of larger amounts of farm produce especially at farm gate level.

Furthermore, women are more involved in food crop production whereas men are more

involved in cash crop production. The food crop sector is generally considered to be less

lucrative than the cash crop sector and fewer resources are usually spent by the State on the

development of the former sector. Benneh et al., (1995), claim that women are more involved

in food crop production because it is less costly, it requires less labour and food crops can be

grown on the less fertile soils, inter-cropping of food crops is possible. The authors observed

that few women are involved in the production of cocoa, one of the major cash crops grown

in Ghana, partly because of the high labour inputs and huge capital outlays for land

acquisition and input procurement (i.e. seeds, insecticides, implements etc.) demanded by the

cocoa industry. Most women could not take advantage of the new opportunities afforded by

the cocoa industry as they lacked necessary capital inputs and labour requirements.

The opportunities fell largely on able and enterprising men, who strongly depended on

migrant labour to operate their farms. Ghanaian women are obliged, by tradition, to assist

their husbands in their farming activities.

These activities are often carried out in addition to their own farming activities, which are

either

Performed on their husbands’ plots or on separate plots of land that have been allocated to

them.

This tradition further increases the workload of women and restricts the amount of time that

they

are able to spend on their own farming activities (Duncan, 1997). Across time and cultures, a

division of labor based on gender has always existed, whereby some work has been defined

as men’s work, some as women’s work (Jackson & Pearson, 1998). A woman is seen to

complement and support her husband’s work by processing the food for the family. Even

with the advent of cash economy, these gender roles have not changed (Amanor, 2001).

Farming households are predominantly agricultural households where the division of labour

revolves around agricultural activities. An analysis of social relations in the research area

shows that gender and power relations within the family define the actions and roles of

individual members, and these are based on the work that men and women do on the farm.

Breadwinner is a European concept dating back to the Victorian days when wives were not

allowed to work and husbands provided all the needs of the family. The meaning, however,

differs in Ghanaian context because men do not provide all the financial and subsistence

37

needs of the family. Wives undertake both on and off farm economic activities to support

their families. In some cases their financial support supersedes those of their husbands.

The relatively rigid traditional division of labour remains the same in most households, with

very little exceptions. More often than not, women tend to undertake tremendous

responsibilities that go beyond simply “complementing” the work of men. Whitehead (1981),

stresses that the gender division of labour does not refer merely to a list of men and women’s

jobs, nor is it based on a set of cultural values about the suitability of various activities

according to the specific gender categories.

According to the author, rather, it suggests a system of allocating the labour of women and

men to specific activities, and of equal importance, a system of distributing the products of

these activities. The allocation of different tasks to men and women consequently has

significant implications for the organization of productive processes, in that it involves issues

of command and control. It also creates the necessity of exchanging and distributing between

women and men, goods that their joint or separate labour has produced (Whitehead,

1981:90).

3.6 Access to and control over resources

In the context of African development, access to land and other resources are key to basic

livelihood and therefore a question of fundamental human rights. The domination of

agriculture in most African economies suggests the importance of land as a basic tool of

development and a significant determinant of income earning power. A World Bank study

pointed out that women are at the core of the economies of Sub-Saharan Africa, comprising

about 60% of the informal sector and providing about 70% of total agricultural labour

(Blackden and Bhanu, 1998). Statistical data for Ghana show that women account for about

half of the agricultural labour force and produce around 70% of Ghana’s food crops (Gender

and Agricultural Development Strategy, 2001). The World Bank study continues to say that

women are the principal agricultural workers and food producers and are primarily

responsible for assuring food availability in the family. However, their central position in

economic production, attaining food security goals and meeting family nutritional needs

contrasts with the systematic discrimination they face (often reinforced by custom,

convention, culture and law) in access to and control over the basic assets needed, if they are

38

to participate fully in realising the region’s economic growth potential. Experts believe that

economies will grow faster and countries will become less poor if gender-based inequality is

substantially reduced or eliminated.

Kotey and Tsikata (1998) have argued that discussions revolving around agricultural

productivity are best explained through a land rights analysis using a social relation’s

approach. The “gender perspective” approach used by the World Bank to analyse growth and

poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa recognises that women stand at the crossroads between

production and reproduction, between economic activities and the care of human beings, and

therefore between economic growth and human development. Such an approach takes

account of existing discriminatory, unequal and inequitable (power) relationships and

practices, and lays the basis for more sustainable development based on legal and social

justice. It also provides room for a broader view of social groups.

3.7 Conclusion

From the review of the literature above, gender disparities and its effects on women’s

livelihoods is a crucial issue. There are various livelihood assets comprising, natural capital,

economic or financial capital, human capital, and social capital from which different

productive streams are derived from which livelihood are constructed. Most people embark

on series of livelihood coping strategies such as agriculture, livelihood diversification and

migration. Rural women who are the focal subject of the study are denied access and control

over resources to pursue their livelihoods. It has been noted from the review that, policy

interventions have been introduced and implemented across the globe to curtail gender

disparities. The critical issue however is that, the rural woman has not yet benefitted from

such interventions. As a result of this, poverty among women at the community level is high

and livelihood security is also at stake. It is therefore vital to pursue this study, to understand

and know why gender disparities abound in the community, why interventions have not

reflected at the community level, and more importantly, why women are denied access and

control over livelihood resources and assets.

39

CHAPTER FOUR

4.0 Data Analysis and Presentation

4.1 Introduction

This chapter deals with the analysis of data collected from the field which has been divided

into two. The first one looks at the respondents’ sex, educational level and their occupation,

and final part looks at various sources of livelihood, effort of actors in gender empowerment,

challenges on economic livelihood as a result of gender disparities and effects of gender

disparities on women’s livelihood.

4.2 Socio-demographic Characteristics

4.2.0 Occupation of Respondents

From figure 4.1 below, the study reveal that, 18% of respondents were students, 42% were

farmers, 14% were traders, 14% were teachers, 4% were nurses, 2% were artisan, 4% were

hair dressers and 2% were seamstresses. Therefore the occupation of an individual

40

determines the level of income earned. It was however revealed that the greater income

earners are nurses, teachers, farmers, traders, hairdressers, seamstress as well as artisans.

Bar chart showing the occupational distribution of respondents

Figure 4.1

Source: Field Survey 2013

4.2.1 Level of Education of Respondents

The survey assesses the educational level of respondents, from primary to tertiary level,

however, 28% of respondents have not attain primary education and others. This has led to

the inability to identify their potentials and also reduced their capacity to work. See table 4.2

below.

Table 4.2 Respondents Level of Education

Level of Education

Frequency

Percentage (%)

None

20

40

Primary

6

12

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

STUDENTS FARMERS TRADERS TEACHERS NURSES ARTISANS

Occupational Distribution

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE OFRESPONDENTS

41

J H S

5

10

SHS

10

20

Diploma

6

12

Degree

3

6

Total

50

100

Source: field survey, 2013.

Illiteracy is the cause to most of our societal and economic problems of which gender

discrimination in Piree community is not an exception. From the table 4.2, the educational

characteristics in Piree revealed by the survey have shown a wide margin of illiteracy rate

(40%). Also, about 22% of the respondents have attain basic education, that is, primary and

junior high, tertiary education 18% and senior high 20%. This indicates that, the

understanding of women empowerment are not understood by the people of Piree and this

can further inhibit any attempt by external gender empowerment agencies to promote gender

equality. High levels of illiteracy rate also facilitate gender disparities in Piree.

4.2.2 Gender

Out of 50 questionnaires administered, male were 21 and female were 29 representing 42%

and 58% respectively. It was however revealed, high illiteracy rate as well as high levels of

poverty was among female than male due to their limited access to and control over resources

in Piree.

Figure 4.2.2 Pie chart showing sex of respondents

42

Source: Field Survey, 2013

4.3 SOURCES OF LIVELIHOOD

The respondents made us to know the various sources of livelihood as shown in the figure

below;

Figure 4.3 Bar chart showing the sources of livelihood of respondents

Source: Field Survey 2013

42%

58%

SEX OF RESPONDENTS

MALE FEMALE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

FARMING SHEABUTTER EXTRACTION

PITO BREWING TRADING SHEABUTTER EXTRACTION

AND FARMING

SHEABUTTER EXTRACTION

AND PITO BREWING

19

2 13 3

1

38

42

6 6

2

frequency Percentage of livelihood sources

43

From the figure 4.3 above, it can be deduced that the most prominent source of livelihood in

the community is farming which constitute 28%, and also it can be found in respondents who

engage in two or more livelihood activities.

The above indicates that agriculture is the main source of livelihood in the community. If

women are therefore denied access to and control over land in the community, it increases

their level of vulnerability.

4.4 GENDER ROLES AND DIVISION OF LABOUR

From the table below, the survey revealed that, men and women perform multiple role in

the community, as both are involved in; reproductive activities, productive activities,

community management activities and community politics. However, women generally

spend less time on productive activities and community politics in comparison to men due

to their heavy daily workload. While men are able to focus principally on their productive

tasks and carry out their activity sequentially, women often are obliged to carry out a large

number of tasks, especially reproductive tasks, simultaneously and dispersed over the day.

Table 4.4

44

Source: Field Survey 2013

4.5 EFFECTS OF GENDER DISPARITIES ON WOMEN’S LIVELIHOOD

The group’s findings show that the existing gender disparities in Piree have financial, social,

and political effect on women as respondents admitted that, it leads to high level of poverty,

low level of girl child education, lack of capacity to function and influence decision making

that concern their lives.

Figure 4.5

A bar chart showing the effects of gender disparities among men and women in

percentages

45

Source: Field Survey 2013

From the chart above, it was deduced that, 12 out of the 50 respondents attested that high

levels of poverty is among men whereas 38 also admitted that it is common among women

than men. Also, 16 from the 50 respondents revealed to the group that low level of education

is common among men, whereas 34 is of the view that it (low level of education) is high

among women. Lastly, 10 of the 50 respondents made known to the group that lack of

capacity to function and influence decision making is common within men but 40 is of the

view that it is common among women.Women are denied full legal, social, and economic

rights such as education, secured livelihoods, property ownership and credit and they are

forced to rely on child bearing for survival, status and security. Women and girls in Piree

have less access to education and productive resources than men, and with increased

competition, they lose out even more.

4.6 ACCESS TO AND CONTROL OVER RESOURCES

Through our discussions, it was deduced that women’s central position in economic

production, attaining food security goals and meeting family nutritional needs contrasts

with the systematic discrimination they face (often reinforced by custom, convention,

culture and law) in access to and control over the basic assets needed, if they are to

participate fully in realizing the community’s economic growth potential.

Table 4.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

HIGH LEVEL OFPOVERTY

LOW LEVEL OFEDUCATION

LACK OF CAPACITYTO FUNCTION AND

INFLUENCEDECISION MAKING

MALE

FEMALE

46

Source: Field Survey 2013

From the table above, it can be seen that women have less access and control over the

identified resources except the trees and forest resources. This has therefore increased their

level of vulnerability.

4.7 EFFORT OF ACTORS IN GENDER EMPOWERMENT

Table 4.7

ACTORS

CONTRIBUTION

47

NGOs (Plan Ghana, WVI)

i. Education, Sensitization, Awareness

creation on gender disparities.

ii. Provision of financial support

iii. Provision of self-help initiatives

iv. Provision of humanitarian services

District Assembly

i. Community engagement

ii. Education and awareness creation

Community members

Community mobilization for gender

awareness programmes

Religious bodies

Advocacy

Source; Field Survey 2013

From the table 4.4 above, it can be deduced that the effort of actors in gender empowerment

is one way of curbing the situation, mainly via education and sensitization without a

corresponding change in the root causes of gender disparities notably customs, conventions,

culture and laws in the community.

4.8. CHALLENGES OF GENDER EMPOWERMENT IN PIREE COMMUNITY

The main challenges identified include;

i. Lack of commitment by the community.

ii. Inadequate logistics

iii. Outmoded cultural beliefs and practices

iv. High illiteracy rate

48

4.8.1 Lack of commitment by the community

Lack of commitment by the community members is a major challenge of gender disparities in

the community. The contribution of the community members especially males to gender

empowerment programmes is very low. This is highly attributed to various misconceptions

that they perceive, for example, some believe that their wives will not respect them, others

believe that adopting gender empowerment programmes will destroy their culture.

4.8.2 Inadequate logistics

There are inadequate logistics to carry out effective gender empowerment programmes. Visits

made to the various actors such as the district assembly, NGOs, religious bodies, and some

gender activists revealed that series of gender awareness programmes have been laid down

yet the requisite logistics to carry out such programmes are inadequate.

4.8.3 Outmoded cultural beliefs and practices

There is the existence of outmoded cultural beliefs and practices in Piree community which

undermine the position of women and inhibit gender empowerment programmes. Examples

of such beliefs are that men are the head of the family hence access to and control over

resources is entrusted unto them only. An interview with the women self-help initiative group

revealed that denial of right to claim ownership of land especially when their husbands die is

a threat to their livelihood.

4.8.4 High illiteracy rate

The low level of education among the people of Piree has limited their capacity to work and

adapt to changes. The survey revealed that women, especially, are unable to tradeoff between

on and off-farm activities.

4.9 CONCLUSION

The survey revealed that, the issue of gender disparity exists in the community. This situation

compels various actors to intervene in reversing the issue. However the efforts of these actors

in gender empowerment have not yielded the intended objective. It is also realized that the

existing gender disparities affects the financial, social, and political life of women in the

community.

49

CHAPTER FIVE

5.0 INTRODUCTION

This chapter presents a summary of the main findings, conclusions and recommendations

aimed at limiting gender disparities on women’s livelihood in Piree.

5.1 Summary of Findings

5.1.0 Gender Roles and Division of Labour

The survey revealed that, men and women perform multiple role in the community, as both

are involved in; reproductive activities, productive activities, community management

activities and community politics. However, women generally spend less time on productive

activities and community politics in comparison to men due to their heavy daily workload.

While men are able to focus principally on their productive tasks and carry out their activity

sequentially, women often are obliged to carry out a large number of tasks, especially

reproductive tasks, simultaneously and dispersed over the day. Thus women productive time

50

and flexibility are much more constrained compared to men, often leading to trade-offs

between their non-productive and productive roles. More so, through our observation, it was

discovered that, women are more involved in farming activities such as planting, weeding,

watering, harvesting, the transportation of farm produce, agro-processing and the marketing

of small amount of farm produce, whereas men are more involved in the initial clearing of the

land, the tilling of soils and marketing of large amount of farm produce especially at farm

gate level.

5.1.1 Access to and Control over Resource

Through our discussion with the community, we deduced that women play central position in

economic production, attaining food security goals and meeting nutritional needs yet it

contrasts with the systematic discrimination they face often reinforced by customs,

conventions, culture and law, in access to and control over the basic assets needed.

5.1.2 Livelihoods Strategies or Activities

Through our survey it was realised that the dominant livelihood strategy in the community is

agriculture with about 28%, petty trading 6%, Shea butter extraction 4%, pito brewing 2%

and those who engage in multiple livelihood activities are 60%.

5.1.3 Efforts of Actors in Gender Empowerment

The efforts of the actors in limiting gender disparities in Piree is not encouraging since there

have not been a complete change in the root causes especially, customs, conventions, culture

and laws, that often result to gender disparities. Also from the group discussion from the

districts assembly and gender activists, many efforts have been made to curtail gender

disparities in the community but the intended objectives have not been achieved due to the

fact that the community especially those in authority are resisting change in the status quo.

5.1.4 Challenges of Gender Empowerment

Through our discussions with the community members, Nadowli District Assembly, gender

activists, corporate organizations and individuals, it was revealed that the main challenges

include;

I. Lack of commitment by the community at large is the major challenge affecting

gender equality in Piree.

II. Lack of logistics to carry out effective gender empowerment programmes.

III. Outmoded cultural beliefs and practices in Piree also inhibit gender equality.

51

IV. High level of illiteracy rate also facilitates gender disparities in Piree.

5.1.5 Effects of Gender Disparities

Findings shows that, existing gender disparities have financial and social effects on women as

respondents admitted that, it leads to high level of poverty on the side of women and low

level of girl child education. More so it has health implication on women since women are

not able to afford quality health care as a result of poverty.

5.2 Conclusion

In summary, the research reveal that gender disparities in Piree is very rampant due to the

reinforcement by customs, conventions, culture and laws of the people, which is the

determinant of access to and control over the basic assets. However, stakeholders in gender

empowerment such as Nadowli District Assembly, gender activists, civil society

organisations and non-governmental organizations, found in Piree have not accomplish much

as far as the issue of gender disparities is concerned. Again the survey has identified some

challenges of gender equality, which are; lack of commitment by community at large, lack of

logistics to carry out gender empowerment programmes, outmoded cultural beliefs and

practices and high level of illiteracy rates. Lastly, the issue of gender disparities has resulted

negatively in financial and social effects on women. Therefore, there is the need to persist for

a complete change in the root causes of gender disparities to bring about an improvement in

the well-being of women and ensure adequate development in the community.

5.3 Recommendations

Based on the findings, the following recommendations were made to limit the issue of gender

disparities in Piree;

i. Nadowli District Assembly and other benevolent NGOs should provide adequate

logistics to carry out effective gender empowerment programmes in Piree.

ii. Traditional authorities as well as community members should be committed by

persisting for a total change in the outmoded cultural beliefs and practices that

prevent women from access to and control over basic assets.

iii. Nadowli District Assembly, Ghana Education Services and NGOs should provide

scholarships to the people to minimize the illiteracy rate in the community.

iv. Nadowli District Assembly should formulate bye-laws and effectively enforce the

bye-laws to improve gender equality in Piree.

52

In all, gender equality should involve the efforts of all stakeholders thus, government, district

assembly NGOs, religious groups or associations, civil society organizations, individuals and

the community at large.

REFERENCES

AFSHAR R., 2003.Dynamics of Poverty, Development and Population Mobility: The

Bangladesh Case. Ad Hoc Expert Group Meeting on Migration and Development,

organized by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok,

27-29 August.

Amanor, K.S. 2001. Land, Labour and the family in Southern Ghana; A Critique of Land

Policy under Neo-Liberalisation. Uppsala: NordiskaAfrikainstitute, Research Report no.

116.

Amanor- Wilks, D. 1996. Invincible Hands: Women In Zimbabwe’s Commercial Farm

Sector, Southern African Feminist Review 2(1):37-57

Apusigah, A.A. and Mohammed J. A. 2005. Baseline Study on Human Trafficking and

Forced Labour among Women and Girls in northern Ghana. Unpublished Research

Report submitted to ILO, Accra and Geneva.

Bacho, F.Z.L. 2004. Can I Sell One of My Cows? Institutions? Assets and Gender based

Poverty, Ghana Journal of Development Studies.

53

Baden, S., Green C., Otoo N. O., and Peasgood T., 1994. Background paper on gender

issues in Ghana. Report prepared for the West and North Africa Department, Department

for Overseas Development, DFID. UK.

Beijing Declaration & Platform for Action.Covenant for the New Millennium (Fourth

World Conference on Women, Beijing, September 4-15, 1995)

Benschop, M. 2004. Women’s Rights to Land and Property.

Cohre,2004. Bringing Equality Home Promoting and Protecting the Inheritance of Rights

of Women. A Survey of Law and Practice in Sub-Saharan Africa, Centre on Housing

Rights and Eviction: Geneva.

Duncan, B.A, Brants, C. 2004. Access To And Control Over Land From A Gender

Perspective, A Study Conducted In The Volta Region Of Ghana.

IFPRI, 2004. Are Wealth Transfers Biased Against Girls? Gender Differences in Land

Inheritance and Schooling Investment in Ghana’s Western Region, paper no. 186.

ILO, 2000. Modular Package on Gender, Poverty and Empowerment Reader’s Kit-

Access to Assets.

Kachingwe, N. Social Movements, Land and Agrarian Reforms and Women’s rights,

Issues papers for ActionAid International Gender Programme, AAI, Harae; Zimbabwe.

Mechthild and Runger, 2006. Governance, Land Rights and Access to Land in Ghana- A

Development Perspective on Gender Equity.

Quinsumbing, Payongayong, Aidoo, Otsuka, 2001. Women’s Land Rights in the

Transition to Individualised Ownership: Implications for Tree-Resource Managementin

Western Ghana, in Economic Development and Cultural Change, The University of

Chicago Press, Journal Division: Chicago.

Scoones I., 1990.IDS working paper 72, 1998

Scott A. and Forster M. “United Nations Development Programme, 1995”

54