Assessment rubric for etec 590 e-portfolioMaster of Educational Technology (MET)

AudienceCriteria (Check off)Is stated and definedIs relevant and applicableIs discussed and explained in reasonable detailRemains implied throughout the project

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

PurposeCriteria (Check off)Is stated and explained in reasonable detailIs relevant and applicable to the target audienceComplements and supports the metaphorIs reflected in the content throughout the projectIs reflective and introspective in nature

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

ArtifactsCriteria (Check off)Demonstrate personal, professional, and educational growthAre varied in selectionAre relevant and applicable to overall theme and metaphorAre at least ten in numberAre meaningful and purposefulComplements and supports the purpose

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

MetaphorCriteria (Check off)Is personalIs uniqueIs sensible, reasonable, and appropriateIs intriguing, interesting, and/or compellingIs meaningful and purposeful

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

Reflections Criteria (Check off) Are meaningful and

purposeful Show personal, professional,

and educational growth throughout the MET journey

Are supportive, applicable, and relevant to the artifacts

Demonstrate accumulated knowledge, skill, and learning

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

MultimediaCriteria (Check off)Is varied in number and in typeIs relevant and applicable to MET reflections and MET journeyIs embedded correctly for viewingIs sourced/documented

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

Tour GuideCriteria (Check off)Is easy to understand and to followIs articulateIs not too long (i.e. 3-5 minutes)Is operationalIs in video formatIs of reasonable quality in audio and in video production

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

NavigationCriteria (Check off)Is user-friendly (i.e. easy and simple to scroll through portfolio content and to click on hyperlinks and multimedia) Is not cluttered (i.e. not too multi-layered)Is organized, using tabs, headings, menu, categories, and/or headers

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

Content OrganizationCriteria (Check off)Is reader-friendlyIs visually appealingIs relevant and applicable to the MET reflections and the overall MET journeyUses paragraph formattingIncludes various scholarly references and citationsIs meaningful and purposeful

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

Visual PresentationCriteria (Check off)Is aesthetically pleasingIs creativeIs unique

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

DesignCriteria (Check off)Is visually appealingUses a variety of creative and artistic features that capture attentionIs relevant and applicable to theme and metaphorIs unique

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

StyleCriteria (Check off)Is personalIs uniqueIs interesting, intriguing, captivating, and/or compellingIs visually appealing

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

ConventionsCriteria (Check off)No multiple spelling or grammatical errorsUse of a variety of sentence structuresNo unintended colloquialisms and clichésNo non-standard EnglishAppropriate use of capitalizations and punctuationNo overall use of wordiness

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress

DocumentationCriteria (Check off)Is cited and referenced according to APA formattingIs cited and referenced correctly and appropriately throughout the projectIs varied, using at least 10 scholarly materials (e.g. e-articles, e-journals, Web sites)> Includes a bibliography

Grade (Check off)

PassIn progress