assimilation of cross-track infrared sounder radiances at ...characteristics and spectral...

1
[email protected] Baseline configuration The way forward The positive forecast impact from the baseline configuration does not reproduce in newer experiments based on a more up- to-date IFS version (Cy40r1) and using higher vertical resolution. Further optimization on the use of CrIS radiances is being carried out focussing on the following modifications: • Pre-selection of the warmest FOV • 12 channels in the water vapour absorption band added to the assimilation • Humidity-sensitive channels removed from the long-wave CO 2 absorption band • Stringent tuning of the cloud detection in response to the low noise levels • Observation error standard deviation relaxed to 0.5 / 0.3 / 1.2 K The following approaches will be considered when designing future experiments to improve the assimilation of CrIS radiances: • Account for inter-channel error correlations other than those introduced during the signal apodization • Use collocated imager information to assist the cloud detection: VIIRS-based estimates of cloud parameters are available for doing this • Assimilate stratospheric-peaking channels over land • Study the impact of CrIS in a degraded assimilation system, where no AIRS radiance data is available Figure 7 Smoothed (line) and unsmoothed (dots) background departures on vertically-ranked channels in two single cases. Channels diagnosed cloud-contaminated in each case are shown in red. Figure 8 Frequency distribution of background departure on a mid-tropospheric sounding channel before (black) and after (red) the cloud detection re-tuning. Figure 10 Inter-channel observation error correlations as diagnosed using the Hollingsworth – Lönnberg method in a selection of 128 CrIS channels. Figure 9 Pixel-number-specific background departure statistics after Warmest-FOV-based data selection: mean (black), standard deviation (blue) and count (green). Statistics are shown for channel 61. Cloud detection Cloud-contaminated channels are rejected from the assimilation. Cloud contamination is diagnosed using a detection scheme of McNally & Watts (2003) and it is based on brightness temperature background departures in a set of vertically-ranked channels in the 15 μm CO 2 absorption band. Because of cloud contamination, typical count of usable data on a window channel CrIS instrument CrIS is a Michelson interferometer attached to the Suomi-NPP polar-orbiting satellite launched into an afternoon orbit in October 2011. The infrared sounder provides radiance information on 1,305 channels in the wavenumber range 650 – 2550 cm -1 . Field-of-View diameter is 13.5 km in nadir and global coverage is produced every 12 hours. Approach We aim at operational assimilation of Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) radiances in the global NWP system of ECMWF. Experience gathered from earlier hyper-spectral radiances, including those from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI), is applied where possible: the experimental assimilation of new radiances is limited to cloud-free channels over sea and sea ice, and the emphasis is put on the efficient use of temperature sounding channels in the 15 μm CO 2 absorption band. In contrast to the operational use of IASI radiances, a large number of spectrally-adjacent CrIS channels are assimilated using a relatively aggressive specification for observation error standard deviation. This is hoped to compensate for the poorer spectral resolution of CrIS instrument. A non- diagonal observation error covariance matrix is applied to account for the effect of the signal apodization. Assimilation of Cross-track Infrared Sounder radiances at ECMWF Reima Eresmaa, Tony McNally and Niels Bormann European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK The effect of spectral resolution Used in experiments with the previously operational IFS version (Cy38r2) in resolution T511 / L91 • Pre-select the middle FOV (pixel 5) from each Field-of-Regard • Assimilate 122 channels from the long-wave CO 2 absorption band • Set observation error standard deviations to 0.4 / 0.2 / 0.6 K • Assume signal apodization to be the only source of observation error correlation • Assimilate data over sea and sea ice only • Use RTTOV-10 for radiative transfer modelling • Use variational bias correction with air-mass- and scan-angle-dependent predictors • Assimilate one FOV per thinning box (1.25° by 1.25°) only A consistently positive medium-range forecast impact extending over the whole of troposphere is found in the extratropics, while a negative impact is seen in the tropical upper troposphere Conclusions As compared with earlier hyper-spectral sounders, CrIS radiances are affected by a unique trade-off between noise characteristics and spectral resolution. Therefore, experience from the operational assimilation of AIRS and IASI radiances is insufficient to facilitate successful assimilation of CrIS radiances. We have put emphasis on strong exploitation of cloud-free sounding channels in the 15 μm CO 2 absorption band. We demonstrate a positive medium-range forecast impact in the extratropics from assimilating CrIS radiances into the previously- operational IFS version at ECMWF. However, similar level of performance has not yet been produced in the currently-operational IFS version. Work is in progress to fully understand the nature and impact of CrIS radiance data in the ECMWF 4D-Var system. is only 20% of that on a high-peaking stratospheric channel. The low noise level of CrIS results in increased sensitivity to contamination by undetected clouds. Therefore, parameters of cloud detection need to be tuned more stringently for CrIS than for earlier hyper- spectral sounders. In an appropriately- tuned detection scheme cloud-free background departures constitute a nearly symmetrical and Gaussian histogram. McNally & Watts (2003): A cloud detection algorithm for high-spectral-resolution infrared sounders. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. , 129 , 3411—3423. 200 hPa 500 hPa 850 hPa Northern extratropics Z T W R Z T W R Z T W R Tropics Southern extratropics Jacobian (K/K) Pressure (hPa) 667.50 680.00 677.50 736.25 740.00 667.50 677.50 680.00 736.25 740.00 10 –1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 –1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 0 650 675 700 725 750 775 Wavenumber (1/cm) 220 240 260 280 220 240 260 280 Brightness Temperature (K) 650 675 700 725 750 775 Wavenumber [1/cm] 650 700 750 800 850 900 Wavenumber (1/cm) 230 250 270 290 Brightness temperature (K) 0.6 K 0.2 K 0.4 K Figure 4 Long-wave CrIS spectrum highlighting assimilated channels. Blue bars indicate the assumed observation error standard deviations. -1.0 -0.5 +0.5 +1.0 Normalized OmB sdev (%) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Pressure (hPa) TEMP Q TEMP T AIREP T -1 -0.5 +0.5 +1 Normalized OmB sdev (%) 6 8 10 12 14 18 20 22 ATMS channel number 5 7 9 11 13 5 4 3 AMSU-A / MHS channel number Metop-A AMSU-A NPP ATMS NPP ATMS Metop-A MHS Figure 5 Normalized global background departure standard deviations for some conventional (left) and space-borne microwave radiance (right) observations in a 90-day assimilation experiment. Negative values imply improved background fit when CrIS radiances are assimilated. Figure 6 Medium-range forecast impact from adding CrIS radiances in the ECMWF 4D-Var system. Z, T, W, and R refer to geopotential, temperature, vector wind, and relative humidity, respectively. Green (red) indicates positive (negative) impact. Dot size indicates the magnitude of the impact. A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I II I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CC C C C CC C C C C C C C C C C C C 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Wavenumber (1/cm) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 OmB St. Dev. (K) AIRS A IASI I CrIS C Figure 1 Global background departure standard deviation on selected AIRS (blue), IASI (red) and CrIS (black) channels. Figure 2 Temperature Jacobians on selected IASI (left) and CrIS (right) channels in a tropical reference atmosphere. Figure 3 Excerpts of IASI (left) and CrIS (right) long-wave spectra. 100 75 50 25 0 125 Channel rank index -3 -2 -1 0 1 Departure (K) 100 75 50 25 0 125 Channel rank index -3 -2 -1 0 1 Departure (K) -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 FG Departure (K) 1 10 100 1000 Count Before After Gaussian -0.9 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Channel number Channel number 1 18 23 28 37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77 82 87 94 101 113 119 124 139 173 210 457 900 1025 1 18 23 28 37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77 82 87 94 101 113 119 124 139 173 210 457 900 1025 650 660.62 663.75 666.88 672.5 675.62 678.75 681.88 685 688.12 691.25 694.38 697.5 700.62 703.75 708.12 712.5 720 723.75 726.88 736.25 757.5 780.62 935 1442.5 1598.75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pixel number 5 10 15 20 25 Count (thousands) -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 OmB Mean or St. Dev. (K) In comparison with earlier hyper-spectral infrared sounders, lower instrument noise levels of CrIS compensate for the effect of the relatively poor spectral resolution. While past experience from the assimilation of AIRS and IASI radiances provides a natural starting point for the use of CrIS radiances, modifications are required to properly account for the different trade-off between noise and spectral purity. We aim at maximizing the meteorological information extracted from apodized radiances by using almost all channels in the most critical spectral range at 670 –730 cm -1 . Using a large number of spectrally-adjacent channels means that observation error correlation introduced by the signal apodization has to be taken into account in the assimilation. Furthermore, the low noise levels are reflected in an aggressive specification of observation error standard deviations during the assimilation.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assimilation of Cross-track Infrared Sounder radiances at ...characteristics and spectral resolution. Therefore, experience ... Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 3411—3423. 200 hPa 500

[email protected]

Baseline configuration The way forwardThe positive forecast impact from the baseline configuration does not reproduce in newer experiments based on a more up-to-date IFS version (Cy40r1) and using higher vertical resolution. Further optimization on the use of CrIS radiances is being carried out focussing on the following modifications:•Pre-selectionofthewarmestFOV•12channelsinthewatervapourabsorption

band added to the assimilation•Humidity-sensitivechannelsremovedfromthelong-waveCO2 absorption band

•Stringenttuningoftheclouddetectioninresponse to the low noise levels

•Observationerrorstandarddeviationrelaxedto0.5/0.3/1.2K

The following approaches will be considered when designing future experiments to improve the assimilation of CrIS radiances:•Accountforinter-channelerrorcorrelations

other than those introduced during the signal apodization

•Usecollocatedimagerinformationtoassisttheclouddetection:VIIRS-basedestimatesofcloud parameters are available for doing this

•Assimilatestratospheric-peakingchannelsover land

•StudytheimpactofCrISinadegradedassimilationsystem,wherenoAIRSradiancedata is available

Figure 7 Smoothed (line) and unsmoothed (dots) background departures on vertically-ranked channels in two single cases. Channels diagnosed cloud-contaminated in each case are shown in red.

Figure 8 Frequency distribution of background departure on a mid-tropospheric sounding channel before (black) and after (red) the cloud detection re-tuning.

Figure 10 Inter-channel observation error correlations as diagnosed using the Hollingsworth – Lönnberg method in a selection of 128 CrIS channels.

Figure 9 Pixel-number-specific background departure statistics after Warmest-FOV-based data selection: mean (black), standard deviation (blue) and count (green). Statistics are shown for channel 61.

Cloud detectionCloud-contaminated channels are rejected from the assimilation. Cloud contamination is diagnosed using a detection scheme of McNally & Watts (2003)anditisbasedonbrightnesstemperaturebackgrounddeparturesinasetofvertically-rankedchannelsinthe15 μmCO2 absorption band. Because of cloud contamination, typical count of usable data on a window channel

CrIS instrumentCrIS is a Michelson interferometer attachedtotheSuomi-NPPpolar-orbitingsatellite launched into an afternoon orbit inOctober2011.Theinfraredsounderprovides radiance information on 1,305 channels in the wavenumber range650–2550cm-1.Field-of-Viewdiameteris13.5kminnadirandglobalcoverageisproducedevery12hours.

ApproachWe aim at operational assimilation ofCross-trackInfraredSounder(CrIS)radiancesintheglobalNWPsystemof ECMWF. Experience gathered from earlier hyper-spectral radiances, includingthosefromtheAtmosphericInfraredSounder(AIRS)andInfraredAtmosphericSoundingInterferometer(IASI),isappliedwherepossible:theexperimental assimilation of new radiances is limited to cloud-free channels over sea and sea ice, and the emphasis is put on the efficient use of temperature sounding channels in the 15 μmCO2 absorption band.In contrast to the operational use ofIASIradiances,alargenumberofspectrally-adjacent CrIS channels are assimilated using a relatively aggressive specification for observation error standard deviation. This is hoped to compensate for the poorer spectral resolutionofCrISinstrument.Anon-diagonal observation error covariance matrix is applied to account for the effect of the signal apodization.

Assimilation of Cross-track Infrared Sounder radiances at ECMWFReima Eresmaa, Tony McNally and Niels BormannEuropean Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK

The effect of spectral resolution

Used in experiments with the previously operational IFS version (Cy38r2) in resolution T511 / L91•Pre-selectthemiddleFOV(pixel5)fromeachField-of-Regard

•Assimilate122channelsfromthelong-waveCO2 absorption band

•Setobservationerrorstandarddeviationsto0.4/0.2/0.6K

•Assumesignalapodizationtobetheonlysourceofobservation error correlation

•Assimilatedataoverseaandseaiceonly•UseRTTOV-10forradiativetransfermodelling•Usevariationalbiascorrectionwithair-mass-and

scan-angle-dependent predictors•AssimilateoneFOVperthinningbox(1.25°by1.25°)

onlyA consistently positive medium-range forecast impact extending over the whole of troposphere is found in the extratropics, while a negative impact is seen in the tropical upper troposphere

ConclusionsAscomparedwithearlier hyper-spectral sounders, CrIS radiances are affected by a unique trade-off between noise characteristics and spectral resolution. Therefore, experience from the operational assimilation of AIRSandIASIradiancesisinsufficientto facilitate successful assimilation of CrIS radiances.We have put emphasis on strong exploitation of cloud-free sounding channels in the 15 μmCO2 absorption band. We demonstrate a positive medium-range forecast impact in the extratropics from assimilating CrIS radiances into the previously-operational IFS version at ECMWF. However,similarlevelofperformancehas not yet been produced in the currently-operational IFS version.Workisinprogresstofullyunderstand the nature and impact of CrIS radiance data in the ECMWF 4D-Varsystem.

isonly20%ofthatonahigh-peakingstratospheric channel.The low noise level of CrIS results in increased sensitivity to contamination by undetected clouds. Therefore, parameters of cloud detection need to be tuned more stringently for CrIS than for earlier hyper-spectral sounders. In an appropriately-tuned detection scheme cloud-free backgrounddeparturesconstituteanearlysymmetrical and Gaussian histogram.

McNally & Watts(2003):Aclouddetectionalgorithm for high-spectral-resolution infrared sounders. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129,3411—3423.

200hPa

500hPa

850hPa

Northernextratropics

Z T W R Z T W R Z T W R

Tropics Southernextratropics

Jacobian (K/K)

Pres

sure

(hPa

)

667.50

680.00

677.50

736.25740.00

667.50

677.50

680.00

736.25740.00

10–1

100

101

102

103

10–1

100

101

102

1030.20.100.20.10 650 675 700 725 750 775

Wavenumber (1/cm)

220

240

260

280

220

240

260

280

Brig

htne

ss T

empe

ratu

re (K

)

650 675 700 725 750 775Wavenumber [1/cm]

650 700 750 800 850 900Wavenumber (1/cm)

230

250

270

290

Brig

htne

ss te

mpe

ratu

re (K

) 0.6 K

0.2 K

0.4 K

Figure 4 Long-wave CrIS spectrum highlighting assimilated channels. Blue bars indicate the assumed observation error standard deviations.

-1.0 -0.5 +0.5 +1.0Normalized OmB sdev (%)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Pres

sure

(hPa

)

TEMP QTEMP T

AIREP T

-1 -0.5 +0.5 +1Normalized OmB sdev (%)

6

8

10

12

14

18

20

22

ATM

S ch

anne

l num

ber

5

7

9

11

13

5

4

3

AM

SU-A

/ M

HS

chan

nel n

umbe

rMetop-A

AMSU-A

NPP ATMS

NPP ATMS

Metop-A

MHS

Figure 5 Normalized global background departure standard deviations for some conventional (left) and space-borne microwave radiance (right) observations in a 90-day assimilation experiment. Negative values imply improved background fit when CrIS radiances are assimilated.

Figure 6 Medium-range forecast impact from adding CrIS radiances in the ECMWF 4D-Var system. Z, T, W, and R refer to geopotential, temperature, vector wind, and relative humidity, respectively. Green (red) indicates positive (negative) impact. Dot size indicates the magnitude of the impact.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AA

AAAAAAA A

AAA

AA

AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

A

AAAAA

AA A

A

A

A

A

A

A

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

IIIIII III I I I

IIIIIII

IIIIIIIII

II

I

I

I

II

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC C CC C C

CC

CC

C

C

CC

CC

C C

800 1000 1200 1400 1600Wavenumber (1/cm)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Om

B St

. Dev

. (K)

AIRSAIASIICrISC

Figure 1 Global background departure standard deviation on selected AIRS (blue), IASI (red) and CrIS (black) channels.

Figure 2 Temperature Jacobians on selected IASI (left) and CrIS (right) channels in a tropical reference atmosphere.

Figure 3 Excerpts of IASI (left) and CrIS (right) long-wave spectra.

1007550250 125Channel rank index

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Dep

artu

re (K

)

1007550250 125Channel rank index

-3

-2

-1

0

1

Dep

artu

re (K

)

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6FG Departure (K)

1

10

100

1000

Coun

t

BeforeAfterGaussian

−0.9

−0.3

−0.2

−0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Channel number

Chan

nel n

umbe

r

1 18 23 28 37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77 82 87 94 101

113

119

124

139

173

210

457

900

1025

1182328374247525762677277828794

101113119124139173210457900

1025

650

660.

6266

3.75

666.

8867

2.5

675.

6267

8.75

681.

8868

568

8.12

691.

2569

4.38

697.

570

0.62

703.

7570

8.12

712.

572

072

3.75

726.

8873

6.25

757.

578

0.62

935

1442

.515

98.7

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Pixel number

5

10

15

20

25

Coun

t (th

ousa

nds)

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

Om

B M

ean

or S

t. D

ev. (

K)

In comparison with earlier hyper-spectral infrared sounders, lower instrument noise levels of CrIS compensate for the effect of the relatively poor spectral resolution. While past experience fromtheassimilationofAIRSandIASIradiances provides a natural starting point for the use of CrIS radiances, modifications are required to properly account for the different trade-off between noise and spectral purity.We aim at maximizing the meteorological information extracted

from apodized radiances by using almost all channels in the most critical spectral range at 670 –730 cm-1.Usingalargenumberof spectrally-adjacent channels means that observation error correlation introduced by the signal apodizationhastobetakenintoaccount in the assimilation.Furthermore, the low noise levels are reflected in an aggressive specification of observation error standard deviations during the assimilation.