astec business case

Upload: jasvin-bhasin

Post on 06-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    1/15

    THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONGKONG

    Astec Business Case

    A Division of Emerson Network

    Jasvin Bhasin

    10/14/2011

    Student ID: s1155006888

    Email ID: [email protected]

    The following document analyses the answers to three very important questions regarding the

    workings of Astec Company and also one question about Li & Fung and Luen Thai company.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    2/15

    1. What is the competitive and supply chain strategy for Astec?

    Answer:

    Astec Power delivers power solutions for a diverse range of

    applications for multiple industries. It plays against aggressive

    competitors in a technologically mature market which is dictated by

    cost wars. In order to sustain its competitive advantage in the power

    industry Astec follows the following strategy checkpoints:

    1. The Emerson Leverage Advantage: Astecs internal division

    called Group Procurement (GP) engages in global sourcing, identifying

    best suppliers, negotiating price and signing contracts with suppliers.

    Being a part of the Emerson group helps Astec gain more purchasing

    bargaining power and a pricing advantage in raw material costs while

    finalising its deals. The huge volume advantage helps push the prices

    down.

    2.Lean Enterprise Program: Astec has tried to incorporate the lean

    culture in its company processes. In procurement for instance, to

    maintain better material availability, service quality level and short

    lead time major suppliers are asked to join a VMI/HUB program

    where in they promise to maintain agreed level of inventory to fulfil

    the requirements of pull lists sent by Astec. A program from

    Manugistics based on parameters such as cost is used to pick the

    required component to generate the pull list which reduces the raw

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    3/15

    material cost significantly. Through the Design verification test (DVT)

    major cost cutting is achieved by using the most cost effective

    components to build prototypes.

    3. Ship-to-hub & Ship-direct Logistic Approach: Astec categorizes

    its customers into two categories Ship-to-hub and Ship-direct. For

    Ship-direct customers products are shipped to customer sites directly

    and Astec assumes minimum risk for payment. But for Ship-direct

    customers Astec has to await payment till they pull the goods from the

    customer hub. Astec sets up hubs close to the customers

    manufacturing facilities for its major customers. It also provides one-

    stop service on any order and shipment by having dedicated teams of

    Inside Sales Representatives (ISR) and Customer Service personnel

    who help the customers to come up with estimated forecast

    information. Astecs third party logistics provider EXEL manages the

    customer hubs. A transfer between warehouses is carried out in

    shortage situations.

    Astec also transports equipment via sea in cases where the products

    air shipping cost outweighs its underlying profit. The hub planners in

    HK plan the production schedules for each manufacturing location.

    The bidirectional relationship between the Baoan and Luoding

    facilities saves transportation costs. DHL uses an Advance Shipment

    Notice (ASN) to speed up the process of customs clearance at the

    Chinese customs for the shipment of overseas suppliers.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    4/15

    4. Sole/Multiple Sourcing: Astec maintains long-term commitments

    with its sole-sourcing suppliers receiving price-reductions in return.

    Some JIT suppliers in close proximity deliver products based on

    production requirements. Multi category vendor help Astec avoid

    production downtime and foster competition to lower purchase price.

    2. How did Astec integrate its supply chain? What can be improvedand how?

    Answer:

    Astecs mother company connections help it enjoy a purchasing

    bargaining power to gain price advantage. The seven Rs- the Right

    Goods, in the Right Quality, at the Right Time, at the Right Place,

    from the Right Source, at the Right Service, and the Right Price are

    integral to the daily operations at Astec.

    1. Procurement: The centralized Group Procurement (GP) divisionreviews contract price to choose best suppliers. Major suppliers of

    Astec are part of the VMI/HUB program and the pull list for daily

    production plans helps reduce raw material cost significantly.

    Astec quality inspector checks the quality of the local materials

    through a pre-audit program at the supplier site.

    The bi-directional relationship between the Baoan and Luoding

    facilities helps save transportation costs.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    5/15

    Astec maintains long term commitment with reliable sole suppliers

    to gain annual price reductions. It also has a string of JIT and

    multi vendor suppliers to cater to dynamic market requests.

    2. Logistics and Delivery: DHL consolidates supplies from differentoverseas suppliers and cross dock to the Baoan facility within a

    twenty-four hour timeframe. Astec sets up hubs close to the

    customers manufacturing facilities for its major customers. When

    overseas suppliers receive pull signals from the Astec Baoan

    factory they ship the materials to Astec from the regional

    warehouse and DHL uses an Advance Shipment Notice to speed up

    the process of customs clearance. As part of the Vendor Managed

    Inventory (VMI) Service DHL operates a warehouse to receive

    shipments and maintain inventory from supplier based on a pull

    list from Astec which is in turn based on invoices provided by

    supplier. These constitute the VMI operations. Astecs third party

    logistics provider EXEL manages the customer hubs. A transfer

    between warehouses is carried out in shortage situations.

    Scope for Improvements

    1. The inventory in the customer hub is not real time visible tohub planners located in Hong Kong. The detailed quantity,

    destination and time of the outbound shipment are not available

    in a timely manner. The half-week long time lag on the

    inventory leads to black holes which make it difficult for

    planners to analyse demand patterns and predict future

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    6/15

    demands. This can be changed by introduce a central system

    that can help in making the inventory in the customer hub

    available in real time to the hub planners. This will reduce the

    time lag.

    2. While the ISRs are evaluated on sales, the production people areevaluated on inventory returns causing a conflict of objectives.

    The ISRs inflate sales forecasts to make sure that there will be

    sufficient goods to meet the customer needs. Hence, the actual

    sales and the sales forecasts in the Presidents Operating Report

    show stark differences. The ISRs and the production people

    should be brought on the same page to resolve their differences

    at a common meeting so that the ISRs should make realistic

    sales forecasts in sync with the production people.

    3.The production planners at the Baoan factory are responsiblefor master production scheduling based on production

    requirements committed to the customers. The master

    production schedule is done on a rolling 13 weeks horizon with

    the scope of change only present after the first three months.

    However, the process to incorporate change is complicated due

    to lack of material visibility in suppliers and logistics hubs. This

    causes a two day delay in effecting the change, increasing cost

    and reducing responsiveness to customers. To counter this

    problem a system needs to be established which will allow

    access to visibility of parts and raw materials so as to simulate

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    7/15

    schedule changes and confirm change requests in short time

    periods.

    4. The suppliers who send materials to the DHL hub provideinventory information to Astec in XML format and this to

    automate the link between Astecs ERP and Advanced planning

    system - Manugistics. But this link has not been built yet. The

    information in XML file has discrepancies with the actual

    inventory at the DHL hub. This leads the planners at the Baoan

    facility to not trust the information system data and hence

    refuse to have direct data interface with the VMI system. This

    can lead to material shortages which can lead to delays and

    production line stoppages. The link between Astecs ERP and

    Manugistics should be built so that the planners at the Baoan

    facility can use the information system data to plan the logistics

    and inventory in a better way.

    5. The Astec and the DHL hub heavily rely on e-mail but theinformation provided by DHL is not that reliable. Astec does not

    monitor the actual inventory of goods supplied by the VMI

    suppliers. Also, there should be an allocation mechanism to

    split the quantity to support Baoan and Cavite factories both of

    which use common parts. This can help counter the case of

    insufficient inventories. Traditional e-mails should be replaced

    with a more dependable central system that tracks orders and

    customer requests.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    8/15

    3. How do power, trust and relationship commitment influencesupply chain integration?

    Answer:

    All three factors or power, trust and relationship commitment are vital

    for supply chain integration. Supply chain integration is the level to

    which a business strategically collaborates with its partners and

    manages intra and inter-organization processes to achieve efficient

    and effective flows of products, information, service, decisions and

    money for the maximum benefit of its customers. This entails treating

    the supply chain as a single system rather than stand-alone

    fragmented entities.

    French and Raven(1959) classified power into five types which can be

    used to classify customer power into the following categories:

    Expert

    Referent

    Legitimate

    Non-Mediated

    Sources Of

    Power

    Reward

    CoerciveMediated

    Sources Of

    Power

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    9/15

    Non Mediated Sources of Power: These types of power are not

    wielded by the customer but are more or less perceived in the eyes of

    the supplier.

    1. Expert Power: In this case the supplier values the customer due toits expertise, knowledge and skills and how it can train the

    supplier with all this wisdom and hence is ready to position itself

    according to the customers wishes. For example: Cummins Engine

    is valued by all its suppliers due to its Six Sigma expertise.

    2. Referent Power: In this case the supplier values being identified orassociated with the customer. For example being the supplier of a

    prestigious company such as Ford can vouch for the credibility and

    capability of the supplier.

    3. Legitimate Power: This is natural power where the supplier thinksthat certain customers have a natural right to influence its actions.

    For example since Ford was Navistars only customer, Navistar

    would have been expected to be willing to conform to Fords every

    wish.

    Mediated Sources Of Power: These are known to the customer and

    are readily exercised with the explicit intent of influencing a supplier.

    1. Reward Power: The customer provides attractive rewards to thesupplier by increasing the the frequency or quantity of its

    purchases.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    10/15

    2. Coercive Power: The customer has the power to punish thesupplier in times to cause it harmful damage. For example, Ford

    tried to use its power to coerce Navistar to lower its engine prices.

    From a relationship standpoint there are two types of relationship

    commitments that can be talked about:

    1. Normative Relationship commitment: This is an ongoingrelationship over an extended period of time, based on mutual

    commitment and sharing. It takes longer to establish such a

    relationship and demands greater investment of resources. But the

    payoff of such a relationship is great in the long term.

    2. Instrumental Relationship commitment: This exists when asupplier accepts the influence of a customer in the hope of

    receiving a favourable reaction. This might be beneficial to one or

    both parties in the short term but fades away when new partner

    opportunities appear.

    The relationship between power, relationship commitment and supply

    chain integration in the context of China can be discussed as follows:

    Both expert and referent power seems to have a positive impact on

    normative relationship commitment, but legitimate power does not.

    The non mediated types of power do not relate to the instrumental

    relationship commitment.

    In China, the legitimate power of the customer to influence the

    supplier is universally accepted. Also, Guanxi networks and Chinas

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    11/15

    collective culture causes the power base to shift to the extended

    guanxi network. Also, the use of the reward power by the customer to

    respond to suppliers expectation is perceived to improve the

    normative relationship commitment.

    By research it has been found that normative relationship

    commitment had a positive impact on supply chain integration by

    helping to achieve competitive advantage and enhancing performance

    while instrumental relationship commitment did not help much.

    Hence, suppliers should cultivate normative relationship commitment

    with their customers making it easier for the involved parties to

    cooperate with each other, sharing information and integrating inter-

    organizational processes based on an intrinsic desire to continue a

    relationship. Instrumental relationship cultivation is has no effect on

    the supply chain integration and in the long run may well damage

    shared values and norms.

    This is reflected very well by the Ford-Navistar case where the lack of

    mutual trust, extreme exercise of power by Ford and a short term

    relationship investment turned into an ugly scheme of events where

    both parties were harmed by negative cross-attacks.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    12/15

    4. How did Luen Thai and Li & Fung manage relationships andintegrate their supply chains?

    Answer:

    Luen Thai (LT) and Li & Fung (LF) are two companies engaged in very

    similar businesses with customer focus and cost optimization as their

    primary targets. However, the two companies are very different in

    terms of their strategies and supply chain models. Hence, the two

    companies also managed their relationships differently.

    The Luen Thai Company and its relationships:

    Luen Thai has a concentrated approach of supply chain city where a

    centralized supply chain model ensures that most of the service

    providers and suppliers are located in close proximity. This is done to

    save travel time and cost and make the supply chain system more

    efficient. There is an extensive centrally controlled IT infrastructure

    that makes sure that there is seamless coordination and optimal

    utilization of production lines.

    Better concentrated control helps Luen Thai to manage its working

    effectively, make swift decisions reducing scope of error and mis-

    management. But it also has to take more accountability for the

    success of the overall supply chain and maintain customer trust.

    Hence, this requires Luen Thai to maintain long term normative

    relationships with its customers based on mutual trust and

    cooperation. Luen Thai has maintained a deep Chinese identity setting

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    13/15

    up supply chain cities in the heart of China. This is largely due to the

    fact that Luen Thai maintains strong control over its centralized

    supply chain model. Hence, it would not be wrong to say that The

    Chinese business practice of Guanxi would be really important in the

    relationship between Luen Thai and its Chinese suppliers. Hence, the

    natural or legitimate right to power would be more acknowledged in

    this typical Chinese set up, and so will be the need to reciprocate the

    suppliers expectation by using reward power. Also, given the quota

    system that was in place in the past, it would have been imperative for

    Luen Thai to have engaged in acts of Guanxi with the state officials

    from time to time to get benefits on quotas and relaxed norms.

    Luen Thai has established a Social Accountability Management (SAM)

    System to maintain the health, safety and compensation of its

    employees. All these efforts go a long way in enhancing productivity

    and motivating employees to perform well in the supply chain process.

    The Li & Fung Company and its relationships:

    Li & Fung believes in the concept of dispersed manufacturing where

    the pieces of the supply chain are evaluated individually for best

    solutions to each step. For example looking for the best possible

    optimal supplier of raw materials, logistics or packaging suppliers

    irrespective of where in the world they are located. Li & Fungs

    relationship with its customers is a very normative one which has

    been forged over years with trust, dedication, unparalleled service and

    mutual cooperation.

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    14/15

    Li & Fungs approach helps it to create customized value chain for

    every customer making it a customer favourite but the managerial

    effort involved in coordinating such a dispersed model can be huge.

    Hence, Li & Fung might be more interested in developing instrumental

    relationships for the short term with these suppliers which gives it

    flexibility to shift across multiple suppliers in times of need. In the

    dynamic textile industry where trends change so often Li & Fung can

    shift between suppliers easily since it does not have permanent

    commitments to its partners.

    Li & Fung has always been concerned with projecting itself as a

    multinational company with diverse roots. This stems from its

    dispersed manufacturing model and its need to manage geographically

    distributed entities. A multinational tag probably benefits Li & Fung in

    striking the right relationship with its global customers, employees,

    suppliers and partners and maintaining a global mindset. Given all

    these facts about its global identity and global partners it can be said

    that the very integral Chinese business practice of Guanxi might not

    be as integral to the workings of Li & Fung in the current time as it

    would have been years before when it developed very traditional

    Chinese products and had very traditional Chinese partnerships.

    In todays modern world, Li & Fung would have to maintain different

    relationships with its global partners to support this global supply

    chain. It can be seen that Li & Fung exercises reward power over some

    of its suppliers, especially the dedicated small units where in it ties

  • 8/3/2019 Astec Business Case

    15/15

    the compensation directly to the units bottom line and keeping no cap

    on the bonuses.

    Given its long and high standing in the industry Li & Fung tries to

    maintain the same close attention to detail with customers as it used

    to do in the past. The current leadership still tries to maintain its

    heritage of customer service. Even in the company there is less regard

    for titles and hierarchy to the extent that the employees have tea with

    the owners family often on. Li & Fung still tries to preserve intimacies

    at the heart of its most successful relationships.