attacks of 9/11 technical investigation eng. mehmet inan

81
Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN www.peace911.org

Upload: samson-mongar

Post on 29-Mar-2015

234 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

Attacks of 9/11

Technical Investigation

Eng. Mehmet INANwww.peace911.org

Page 2: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

2- Official Theory:

• 4 teams of 19 “SUICIDE MUSLIM TERRORISTS” hijacked 4 flights and crashed the planes into buildings and the ground.

Page 3: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

3- THEY USED CUTTERS

• This cutter was presumed to be used in flight UA93, exhibit of the government in Moussaoui’s trial.

Page 4: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

4- Consequences

• 2948 killed during the attacks.• Two wars started and two countries invaded.• More than 4000 American soldiers dead, in addition to

hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian people.• Bin Ladin, known by few, became an overnight

televison celebrity.• Terrorist attacks increased as never before: Bali,

Madrid, London, Iraq, Afghanistan, Turkey, Yemen, …• Muslims are labeled as TERRORISTS. That was the

beginning of the never-ending war against Muslims and no one acted to stop it.

Page 5: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

5- Anomalies 1

• Flight passenger lists had none of the terrorists names. It is possible to make false identity documents for 1, 2 or 3 people; where are the rest?

• Several terrorists reported alive. See BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

• FBI Director Robert Mueller admitted that "the identity of several of the hijackers is in doubt", but he never explained how they had first been identified.

• Arguing over « National Security » almost all information has been classified secret and became inaccessible.

Page 6: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

6- Anomalies 2

• None of the planes parts has been identified by their serial numbers.

• The twin towers could not collapse. They were designed to resist an impact of a similar sized commercial plane, the 707.

• The official reports contain too many omissions, distortions, and lies.

Page 7: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

7- What’s the Reality?

• There are several evidences. But we will study only three proved facts:

• All four planes were controlled by only ONE team. They used American electronic weapon technology.

• The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757.

• Twin towers were demolished by explosives.• For more details, we recommend to look into internet.

Attention: There are too many unrealistic theories on the web. We want to emphasize that we refute them. But when the amount of available information is very small it’s normal to get so many theories, and many disinformation agents. You have to form your own opinion.

Page 8: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

7.1- End of 2002, MEYSSAN/PentagateMeyssan’s missile theory is wrong. But this high temperature explosion (color) proves the presence of a bomb

Kerosene explosion

If Pentagon attack was a bomb, why shouldn’t the WTC attacks be something other than they appear?

Page 9: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

8- How else could the attacks be made?

• By using automated electronic control of the planes from remote area

• Set up one team to make the attacks

• Install the automatic control inside the planes to precisely control them

• The realisation by one team using technology will create some behavioral differences compared with the official version of 4 different terror teams

Page 10: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

9- Compare 4 teams / 1 team

Four terror teams One technologic team

Work

Parallel,Each plane has its own team and

pilot, they will act independently from other planes

Serial,To guarantee the reliability of the

actions and make no mistake, they could manage only one plane at a

time

Coordination between planes

No, As the terrorists couldn’t contact each other after the takeoffs, the

planes will be independent

Yes,As consequence of the serial work it

becomes an obligation

Relation between

Take off & Deviation

of the same plane

End of one plane action &

Beginning of the next plane deviation

• Similar time gap between takeoff and deviation is definitely 4 terror teams made operation.

• Similar time for the end of one hijack and beginning of the next one is definitely one team made operation.

Page 11: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

10.0- Probable sequence with 4 teams

Page 12: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

10.1- Probable Timeline Graphic

with 4 Different Teams

•The deviation from flight route will happen about 15 minutes after the take off.•Each plane will fly directly to its target without worrying about other flights.•Take off delays couldn’t be anticipated.. After take off, terrorists could not contact each other.•There couldn’t be any interdependence between the planes.

Page 13: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

11- Official Flight Path

Source:http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

Page 14: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

11.1- Only one differenceabout UA93

• A phone call starts the hijack at 9:20, the commission report starts it at 9:28.

• The actual deviation begins at 9:35.

• Only the actual deviation is a reliable information!

Page 15: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

12- The sequence of the events

Page 16: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

13- Timeline graphic & conclusions

•All hijacks were made sequentially, one plane at a time!•Before deviating from its flight route, each plane waited for the previous plane to be put on target!•The deviation of any plane was dependent on the situation of the previous plane.

•That’s totally consistent with "ONE team made"  operation, and impossible to make by four different teams.

Page 17: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

14- CONCLUSION

• The timeline of the deviations of the planes is fully consistent with a central

control of all planes by ONE TEAM, managing one plane at a time ,ending

their job few minutes before the impact.

• This timeline is impossible to make by four different teams and totally

meaningless in such case.

Page 18: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

15- HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?

• It’s possible if the planes have remote adjustable automatic control capabilities!

• This technology has existed for decades.

The TOMAHAWK

Page 19: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

16- TOMAHAWK MISSILES

A SMALL PLANE WHICH GUIDES ITSELF ACCORDING TO GPS MEASURED POSITION

In 10/1/2001, 19 days after the attacks, Raytheon released a document showing developments made on 727 and 737 civil aircrafts.

Page 20: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

17- CONTROLE AND GUIDANCE SYSTEMPOSITION MEASUREMENT

Independent from the missile

ORIENTATION MEASUREMENT

Independent from the missile

COMPUTER

Independent from the missile

FLIGHT SURFACES’ MOTORISATION

Simulates pilot actions in an aircraft

Size increases when missile becomes bigger

They must be too much bigger in an aircraft

In the market it is possible to find different sizes and versions, including non reversible ones as standard product.

• If all these systems are installed inside the aircraft but not activated, the plane reacts normally and can take off naturally.

• When activated, the plane reacts like a missile.• The install has to be done during a night or the last maintenance operation.

The maintenance database of these planes has been cleaned up the day of 9/11 and became inaccessible to everybody including the professional aviation companies.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATION

Independent from the missile

Precise altitude measurement

Required only for precise impacts (<1m)

Page 21: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

18- WHAT ABOUT THE PILOTS?

• The installed flight surface control servos can be of non reversible type to prevent the pilots countermanding the remote controls.

• The guidance control computer could use one digital output to activate a release valve injecting a military war gas inside the plane killing all passengers and flight crew.

• In this case, the autopilot can be used to guide the planes. But for the required precision and the validation of the ground control systems, the use missile control system would be necessary.

Page 22: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

19- PLANES• In the next page, we consider that technology installed in all

planes which are controllable like missiles with the same ground equipment.

• The realization explained in the next page is the most probable explanation we found considering all available evidence, the feasibility, the reliability and simplicity of each action.

• We demand that an independent justice court collect all evidences, make the investigation and tell us the reality of these actions.

Page 23: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

20- Managing and sequence of events7:59 – Take off AA118:13:29 — 46R: AAL11, turn 20 degrees right.

8:13:31 — AAL11: 20 right AAL11.8:13:47 — 46R: AAL11, now climb maintain FL350.No answer from AA11 = pilots dead & automatic control activated

Take off UA175

~8:25 – The automatic control of AA11 is validated

Deviation towards twin towers

8:42 – Pilots reported have heard « everyone stay in your seats »

End of connection = pilots dead & automatic control activated

Deviation of UA175

8:54 - UA175 adjustments end

Deviation of AA77

9:35 – Pentagon plane adjustments end

Deviation of UA93

8:45 – AA11 impact on

North Tower

9:03 – UA175 impact on

South Tower

9:38 – Pentagon impact

10:06 – UA93 impact to ground

8:42 – AA11 adjustments end

8:42 – Take off AU93

With 41 min delay

~8:50 – The automatic control of UA175 is validated

PID parameters of AA11 copied into UA175, same B767

Immediate deviation towards twin towers

8:25+ – Automatic guidance system PID parameters are adjusted to guarantee the precision of impact

8:20 – Take off AA77

Page 24: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

20.1- What about Muslims

Muslims are definitely not involved in 9/11

American people should look elsewhere for the criminals who killed 3000 innocents

The Koran 42/40: The recompense for an injury is an injury equal there to in degree: but if a

person forgives and makes peace, his reward is due from Allah: He loves not those who do

wrong.

Page 25: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

21- The Pentagon Attack• These are the sole published

images of the Pentagon attack. Everything is done to avoid any possibility of identifying the plane. We only see the tail part of the plane.

• In reality, there are some movies of the attack recorded by surveillance cameras, some civilian. All were confiscated by the FBI immediately after the attack and have never been released.

Page 26: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

21.1- Pentagon : Damages on the left Façade

Entry hole on column 14

Page 27: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

21.1- Pentagon : Damages on the left Façade

Columns

C11

C12

C13

Columns

C10

C9

C8

Page 28: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

22- Pentagon : Damages on the right Façade

• The entry hole – central fuselage of plane, Column 14• The last damaged column in the right side, Column 20• With 10ft between two columns and 6 bays, that makes 60ft as half the damage span

Page 29: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

23- Pentagon : Plane Approach Direction

• The wingspan calculated corresponds to a Boeing 737-400 that is 95ft

• Flight AA77 was a 757 with a wingspan of 125ft so 3 extra columns should have been damaged

• Approach angle of the plane 52° :

Half a wingspan = right side half damage span(60ft) * sin52° = 47ft,

Implies a wingspan = 94ft

Page 30: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

24- Pentagon: Closer Impact Drawing

• The dimensions fit exactly to those of a Boeing 737

Page 31: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

25- Pentagon : Official Report

• But to justify the presence of a Boeing 757, the same report tells « the external 1/3 of the wings did no damage on the façade ». And that is justified with the impact that the engines made prior to reaching the façade which had to break down the extremity of the wings.

• The official report recognizes that the damages span over 120ft, converted to the perpendicular of the plane direction that makes 90ft instead of 125ft for a 757

Page 32: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

26- Broken ventilation wall

The report assumes this was broken by the left engine.

Note no traces of the engine ploughing into the ground before the wall.

All cable drums were before the wall. This cable drum crossed over starting from the ground near the wall. It had to touch the wall at the ground.

Page 33: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

27- Pentagon : Construction of 737 impactDimensions fit perfectly

Page 34: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

29- Hidden plane

• A Boeing 757-200 was too long and had to be visible behind the box

• A Boeing 737-400 is just hidden behind the box

Page 35: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

30- The Pentagon attack review

• 8:54 The team finished their job on UA175 which is flying toward its target. The team switches on the missile control system on board AA77, switches off the transponder and lowers it to make it invisible to radar. After that moment the flight route of AA77 is unknown.

• But we know that it flew the going path in 8:54-8:20=34 minutes including the take off. For the return path, it took 9.38-8.54=44 minutes WITHOUT TAKE OFF. Including the presence of another take off, there are still 10 min extra. These are the required 10 min for the crash of AA77 on the ground in a secret military zone. There is still enough time to take off a 737 and fly it to the Pentagon situated at 10km from Dulles airport where AA77 took off.

Page 36: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

31- Why Change the Plane?• It is possible to hit a plane on 400m high

towers using a GPS receiver. A precision of +/-50m is still enough. A receiver like that can be installed in the nose of the plane where it is invisible from outside.

• To hit a plane on 23m high building the GPS receiver is not precise enough. So it was necessary to install the “Precise altitude sensor” of Tomahawk missile which has a precision less than 1m.

• To reach that precision, the sensor must have its measurement surface placed outside of the aircraft body. If that kind of sensor was installed on the 757 of AA77 it would be detected by the visual inspection made before each take off.

• If the altitude measurement is not precise enough, the plane can either hit the ground or pass over the building. That’s unacceptable for this kind of action.

Page 37: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

32- Pentagon :All Damages

Notice the orange area where the slab deflected upwards. The sole possibility for that deflection is an explosion happening under it. A kerosene explosion can not accomplish this so far from the façade. A bomb was planted in the plane to increase the damage.

FDR & left landing arm of B757,found here = planted in the plane.

Page 38: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

32.1- Damages made by the

explosion

Slab deflected upwardSome overpressure went on

the first floor.

The bottom picture shows the damage made by the

explosion overpressure.

Page 39: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

32.2- Damages made by the explosionThe overpressure on the first floor pushed out the windows’ frames on the inner façade.

Page 40: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

32.3- Damages made by the explosion

Outside façade damage

Window’s frames are straight, no plane

parts impact on them.

Lime stones were pushed outward and

fallen in to the ground

Page 41: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

33- TOWERS COLLAPSE

• Official Theory : Kerosene fire highly weakened the metal and made the towers collapse.

• The heating of structures of the towers is a speculation subject. In practice, it was impossible to measure temperature of the structures. The smoke was dark showing low temperature fires. In the History, there is no steel framed building collapsing by fire. The fire could not explain these collapses.

• The bottom levels of the buildings were not heated at all.

Page 42: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

34- ANOMALIES OF THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

• The official reports give all details of outer columns and floor trusses but they hide the most important information about the inner core columns. In some pictures the size of these columns are reduced to present them as meaningless.

Page 43: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

35- Floor plan of NIST report

Interior core columns are drawn at good scale. But no dimension details appear in the whole report.Notice that most of the core columns can be accessed from inside the elevators shafts.

Source:http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-1.pdf

Page 44: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

36- NIST Reportexterior columns oversized

Page 45: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

37- Floor plan of FEMA report

Interior core columns are drawn as small square dots representing them as minor elements. Dimension details are not shown in the whole of the report.

Source:http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch2.pdf

Page 46: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

38- Columns picture

Interior core columns are much bigger and stronger than exterior columns. In addition these interior core columns are linked to each other making them extremely strong.

Page 47: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

39- PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE

NORTH TOWER

WTC1

Outer columns still vertical

Outer columns

still vertical

SOUTH TOWER

WTC2

Internal columns

demolished

Internal columns demolished

Page 48: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

40- PHOTO AFTER THE COLLAPSE

Façade columns still vertical

Internal columns demolished,

There must be 47 tube columns, which are 5” thick in the lower floors

Page 49: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

41- STRUCTURE OF THE TOWERS

External columns that remained vertical over some floors after the collapse

It is clear that the inner columns are the main structure of the building. That’s true in all well produced high buildings.

Reversely, the exterior walls can really be compared to a hollow steel shaft.

Internal columns are the main structure of the building Demolished during the collapse! The Commission report contains that LIE :

Page 50: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

42- RESISTANCE OF THE STRUCTURE

According to the reality of the towers and to anti-seismic construction rules

According to the official reports

Page 51: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

43- CONCRETE MADE SKYCRAPER (30floors)

Cast concrete

core section

Thin outer

columns

Page 52: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

44- Possible damage

• These internal columns are able to resist against collapsing of all upper floors.

• The worst possible damage is the sinking of some floors at impact level. Lower floors remaining unchanged.

Page 53: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

45- Internal Core Columns Remain Standing During the Collapse

WTC2These pictures are taken by Aman Zafar who was near the towers (www.amanzafar.com) . They show that the inner core of both WTC1 and WTC2 remained standing while the floors and façade columns were collapsing. That proves that the core section was resistant enough and could not collapse without explosives.

WTC1

Page 54: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

46- Pictures Set

1 2

3 4

Page 55: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

47- Internal Columns identification WTC2

• The left side two close columns pairs could be 504-505 or 604-605 or 904-905 or 1004-1005. They are probably 1004-1005. But we are not sure. We can just tell, some core columns remained erected while others were collapsing.

Page 56: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

48- Internal columns identification WTC1

The vision angle is about 31° from perpendicular to the face. Rotating the flat view by 31° fits the picture exactly to the dimensions.

These columns are identified as being 501, 601, 502, 602, 503, 603, 703, 803. Other columns such as 908, 1008 are visible in other videos and pictures.

Page 57: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

49- TOWERS DEMOLITIONAccording to all available evidence, picture and videos, the demolition has to be done in three steps:

1- Above floor 77/WTC2 and 89/WTC1, explode the core columns at their welded junctions starting from impact floor in order to make the upper part fall as it happened.2- Explode the floor trusses seats at their junctions to the core columns + detach some horizontal and diagonal connections of the core columns.

3- Explode some key core columns near the ground to make the erected core columns collapse.

1

2

2

Page 58: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

49.1 HOW TO MANAGE THAT DEMOLITION

• During the last week-end of 8-9 September 2001, radio controlled and coded RDX or C4 explosives are installed inside the towers on special places accessible from lifts shafts. Each pack is identified by a numeric code. The explosives for the same floor have the same code. Each pack has a quick fixing tool for assembly on the columns. 48 people can easily install explosives on both towers during the week-end.

• Above floor 77/WTC2 and 89/WTC1, the explosives are installed on core all junctions of series 500, 600, 900 and 1000. Every three floor.

• Under floor 77/WTC2 and 89/WTC1, the explosives are installed between floor trusses seat and the core columns to cut the welding of the trusses support. Every floor.

• After the plane hit, on basis of the impact floor, the authors knew the identity code of the explosives which must be exploded to start the demolition.

• To avoid the upper level parts from falling on lower level explosives and damage them, the explosions’ downward moving speed must be similar to free fall speed in the air.

• A laptop computer situated near the towers contained a program producing the radio codes to fire the explosives at wanted speed.

• The control center where the team acted is very probably the WTC building 7 from where both towers are visible and which was collapsed during the afternoon of 9/11/01 and which was leased by the same Larry Silverstein who owned the twin towers.

Page 59: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

50- Core Columns Destruction Method

Page 60: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

51- The distance between two explosions is approximately 3 floors, 36ft

Page 61: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

52- EXPLODED CORE COLUMNS

Page 62: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

53- Horizontal sheared core column

• This picture shows the sheared connection between a box core column and an H section column. This type of connection existed at the uppermost floors of WTC towers. We see that the shearing was made by lateral displacement of the H sectioned column. The welds are pushed rightward in the picture. Such shearing is consistent with the explosion demolition method.

Page 63: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

54- Exploded floor trusses supports• As most of the explosions

happened on the floor trusses supports, these steel beams are the most damaged parts in the building. Here are some pieces, but almost all pictures included in the NIST report show that kind of damages.

Page 64: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

54.1- Dust ejections directions

• When floor trusses inner end is exploded, the floor collapse begins at the inner end; making the floor oblique. The explosions continue to happen downward. The overpressure and dust created by the explosions follows the concrete floor slabs and rises upward-outward direction. When get out the dust began to fall down as the red lines. Watch other videos.

Horizontal ejection of the exploded floor

Empty, “no dust” area

Upward ejection between oblique floors

Vertical ejections in the core section

Floor by floor explosions of trusses’ supports

Core columns strength reduction by exploding of the column to column connections

Page 65: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

55- SOUTH TOWER DEMOLITION

Continuously increasing dust size is meaningful. The explosions are so quick that falling dust reaches newly created dust by the

explosions of the lower floors.

Page 66: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

56- NORTH TOWER DEMOLITION

Video: http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/collapse%20update/wtc-1_jets.mpg

Page 67: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

57- OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 1

• Arabic flight manuals found in a car near of one of the airports: the international language for aviation is English. Student pilots must have an adequate knowledge of English to be accepted for training and all their flight manuals would be in English if, as has been claimed, they undertook flight training in the USA. Arabic manuals are highly suspect and might have been specially prepared in justification of the events following 9/11.

• The half burnt hijacker’s passport found at ground zero: No human body was found, no debris was recognizable, but this passport remained intact, only slightly charred! In reality, this passport was retained by the CIA or some other agency. Then burnt before being shown to the medias.

Page 68: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

58- OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 2

• Phone calls Phone calls made by cellular phones from planes flying at high altitudes of 30,000 feet: Even now in 2007, such calls remain impossible. By design mobile phone signals are guided horizontally to save power and only reach mobile phones at ground level. Therefore, the cellular phones cannot be used in the air.

• Since several decades the technique of synthesizing a voice synthesis is widely used. Israeli companies connected to Hollywood are the market leaders in this domain. In 2010 such voice changing software are available inside smart phones, see screaming bee.

• When listening to some of the alleged call, there is no background noise coming from the planes; the sound is extremely clear as if spoken by actors.

Page 69: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

59- OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 3• Cockpit communications from UA93 released in 2006: These

communications do not have any credibility. They contain meaningless repeats of "sit down!", "what?", and "Allahu akbar". This last sentence is the most familiar Muslim expression in the West, but Muslims would not use it when faced with death.

• Moussaoui case: He was arrested 3 weeks before the attacks when intending to start flight training on 747s. When preparing attacks of this magnitude, it would make sense to start training years ahead, no 3 weeks.

• "I want to learn to fly without take off and without landing" : These alleged comments were provided of their willingness to crash the planes into a building. However, many amateurs interested in flying express themselves like this, wanting the enjoyment of flight without the tedious hard work. By itself such a sentence is worthless as evidence.

Page 70: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

60- What About Bin Ladin?• During the first three years Bin Ladin said he was not

involved in 911!• Now, he is telling that he is the author!• To consider his messages, this needs to be handled by

a court of impartial justice :1. He should speak to an independent court.2. He should be protected, his life guaranteed, to make

his testimony totally free.3. All of his testimony should be checked against the

facts.4. It is too easy for the Bush Administration to have him

free, speaking as Bush wants him to speak. It is also very easy to produce his voice.

5. I refuse to recognize Bin Ladin as a spokesman for Muslims.

Page 71: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

61- OFFICIAL FALSIFICATIONS 4Video of OBL released in November 2001: We saw a bearded man like OBL speaking with very bad sound and making statements like "their lost is more than 3 billion dollar", whereas OBL had studied in England and spoke English well. Physiognomic studies showed that this person was not Bin Ladin. In addition, an ideological fighter will not emphasis financial losses. But we know that for the domestic media the emphasis on financial losses is very important to make an impression on people in the US

Video of OBL released in November 2004 : Here I believe that it was indeed Bin Ladin and he spoke like a Muslim. He indirectly takes responsibility for the attacks and justifies them on basis of 1980's Lebanon attacks: It's too easy for the USA to ask OBL to take responsibility for the attacks in order to left alone! Any way, OBL must be heard by a court of justice, and all what he says must be checked.In 9/2007, other movies containing another OBL with shorter and painted beard speaking against the same background have been released. It's clear that this is not the same person. What kind game is being played here? After using him in 2004, did they kill him and put an actor in his place? It is difficult to tell. The truth can only be found if real evidence is presented.

Page 72: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

62- CONCLUSIONS

• There are many convergent evidences that prove the official theory is false!

• The presence of Muslim suicide pilots is not proved.

• There is enough evidence to request the disclosure of all classified information. Without that disclosure, both national and world security are in danger.

• These attacks can not be managed without knowledge and permission of the Bush administration’s high level deciders.

Page 73: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

63- Does the US Administration have the skills to accomplish these attacks?

• YES, they do!

Some false flag terror attacks having different manner and authors that justified wars :

• Explosion of cruiser Maine! (1898)• Reichstag fire (1933)• Pearl Harbor (1941)• Operation Northwoods (1962)• Assassination of JFK (1963)• Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam (1964)

Page 74: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

64- IMAGE GAMES

OFFICIAL ASCE REPORT’S FIRST PAGE THE REALITY OF THE FACTS

US Navy Base in San Diego City

googleearth

Page 75: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

65- The Conquistador, Successor of HitlerHe managed to start the invasion of Muslims countries

Page 76: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

66- Why? Bali, Madrid, London, Morocco,..

• Life in Muslim countries is simple: If you don’t bother anyone, no one will bother you. But if you attack someone, you will get an equal reaction.

• Let’s remember that before 9/11/01, during Clinton’s Administration efforts for peace in Palestine, the attacks had been reduced and there was dialogue.

• If the number and the intensity of the attacks are low and the reactions remain moderate, it can be resolved with good results.

• Today the intensity of the aggression (Americans) and injustices (Israelis) are so high that there is no room for dialogue or moderate reactions.

• The traditional method of Muslim countries has not adapted to today’s aggressions and injustices.

• We need another solution! The last remaining one is Justice which is imperfect, costly, and slow. Muslims must get used to its methods and complexities. And justice must be less imperfect.

Page 77: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

67- Why? Madrid and London

• Let me explain some doubts about the Madrid and London blasts. I did no investigation into these actions. But my thoughts are:

• In Madrid they used cellular phones as radio controlled firing systems, similar to the explosives used in the WTC towers. The method was new. In 2007 Muslims are still making suicide bombings without using such technology. The authors must be the same people who made 9/11 attacks. I hope the current lawsuit in Spain will lead to some truth. I trust Spanish justice.

• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company, before, during, and after the blasts. Simple children are shown as terrorists.

• These are the sole organized big blasts in European countries.• All other actions done by Muslims in European countries were individual

actions made by foolish people: Theo Van Gogh murder and other people placing gas bottles near the door of a synagogue.

• These small actions are not comparable to the Madrid and London blasts.• To get stronger credibility and remove all doubts in such investigations, all

evidences must be checked and independent Muslim professionals must be fully involved.

• This was before the verdict of Spanish court on 31 october 2007.

Page 78: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

68- 11 March 2004 Madrid attacks

• The Spanish court of justice reached its verdict on 31th October 2007 after 3 years of investigation and an 8-month trial against 28 defendants.

• Three of them were found guilty and received more than a total of 40,000 years imprisonment for having supplied or placed the explosives without participating in the actual bombing.

• The remaining 25 defendants were not at all involved in the Madrid bombings.• 18 of them received several jail sentences of up to 18 years without having taken part

in or being related to the bombings.• 7 were acquitted.• The masterminds of the bombings were not identified.• How can 3 years of investigation bring 25 uninvolved people to the trial while the

masterminds remain unknown?• This poses serious questions for the impartiality of the trial. During 3 years of

investigation all the evidence collected should have identified the masterminds and let those 25 without any direct involvement go free.

• It appears that the court needed to put the blame on someone and thus found passed guilty verdicts on random Muslim suspects.

• As for the exploded flat in Madrid it could well be that ordinary Arab tourists had stayed there. Whilst they were out of the flat some people might have installed explosives in their flat. Upon their return the culprits ignited the explosives by remote control, filming it at the same time for the benefit of the media.

Page 79: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

69- July 7, 2005 London attacks

• The cctv cameras of the London tube were controlled and recorded by an Israeli company named Verint.

• There is no record showing the Muslim bombers entering these wagons.• Natanyahu who had to give a conference near the explosion area received a

call from the Mossad asking him to remain in his hotel.• The policewoman Lizzie Kenworthy was next to the exploded wagon. She

entered inside the explosion area and explained what she saw: The chap next to her had lost his leg and there was a woman to their left who was on her back trapped in the metal, which had twisted up through the middle of the carriage. The roof was still on, but the lining of the carriage had been blown off. The sides had also come off and there was a big hole in the floor. That means the bombs were placed under the carriage. Sources http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/ http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article333787.ece

• According to that testimony of a policewoman it’s impossible that any passenger have placed these bombs under the carriage. So Muslims are not involved in 7/7 London events.

• Justice has to be done again.

Page 80: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

70- MY MOTIVES• The World is becoming a small village, the changes are very

huge. • Humanity is facing several challenges. One of the challenges is

diversity of life.• As a Muslim, I believe that diversity, being the will of God, will

enrich us with our differences. Koran 5/48, 49/13.• As a scientist, I consider peaceful diversity as one of the most

important conditions for life to exist.• That diversity can only exist in a just world!• I know that interest groups created these attacks to start wars. I

didn’t start this investigation to help these warlike people. So let’s not deviate into hate which will make easier the work of these warlike people. Only some American Republican leaders are guilty.

• Let’s act as responsible people for peace and justice. That means fighting against our own unjust people as well. Justice is in the best interest of all.

Page 81: Attacks of 9/11 Technical Investigation Eng. Mehmet INAN

Eng. Mehmet INAN

Copyright 2003-2013

www.peace911.org