attorney dennis c. o'brien

8/6/2019 Attorney Dennis C. O'Brien

1/7

IN

)

THE UNITE.PSTA.TES DJSTRICT COURTFILEDINCFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT' OF GEORGIA",. :: . U.S.O 5ERK'S OFFICE. . -AtlantaATLANTA DIVISION

\ >

JUL 1 9 2011J e ~ M S ~ , ..NITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) , I It::/y. - h--1 v, C l e r ~P l a i n t i f f , ) 0.. - ' - - - - - - & 1 : I f \ f G / ~ r k v. No. 1:03-CR-131-CC-JFK-CCH11:30 am Emergency HearingSCOTT HINTZ, JULY 19, 2011Defendant

MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND CLARIFY THE DOC.443 ORDER, AND NOTICE OF5TH 6THCONTINUING JUDICIAL BIAS AND AND AMENDMENT CONCERNS

FOR JULY 19, 2011 HEARING SCHEDULED BEFORE JUDGE CLARENCE COOPER'.' ,NOW COMES Sco t t HintzaJ;1>!i:rys p ec t f u l l y reques t s l eave to Ie :

(A) motion to r eco n s i d e r '{:ind c l a r i f y t h i s Cour t ' s Ju ly 18, 2011" '. ' . I,,:.: .i:doc. 44 3 o rd e r which den ies Defendant hi s Co ns t i tu t ion r i g h t to of fe r

, : I

t e s t imonia l and othe r evidence in to the record to prove the s tencevo f c o n f l i c t s o f i n t e r e s t and mal ic ious in te r fe rence with Defendant ' s, ;' . .

defense in these proceedin 'gs, ; , and to the f a l s e but unswornI.

s ta tements t h a t Defendan t ' s conf l i c ted a t to rney i s expected to en te rin to the record with Judge Cooper ' ; ass i s t ance during th e Ju ly 19,2011 hear ing a t 11: 30 ) ",","!\,'.' ' . r' : "am, t ! ' ~ r l { { (8) :': ' \ t '"th lS not ice to document th e

-,.>',)0,", .....:. \1,'con t inu ing jUdic i a l b i a s ' ~ o f i ~ ~ " J U d g e Clarence Cooper ag a i n t t h i sDefendant and th e s i g n i f i c ~ n t } s th . and 6th Amendment Right v io la t ions .

Exact ly as Defendant was p r e v i ~ u s l y i n f o r m e d and ex ac t l y as was k: ... - ~ , , . ' 'J : ", .,s e t fo r th in doc.440 p g s . 2 ~ 3 n u m b e r s ( 1 ) ,through (4) , Judge Cooper

showed h is persona l bia s a ~ a i b s t Defendant to ensure Judge Cooper,\Judge Cooper ' s c le rks and Judge Cooper 's e f r i ends would not haveto t e s t i f y during the Ju ly 19, 201'1 hear ing regard ing t h e i r personal

s#

Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC -CCH Document 444 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 7


2/7

and "of f the record" knowleqcj'e" and corrnnunications spec i f i ca l ly.,- . t-,

re l a t ing to th e s u b j e c t mat t e r o'f the. July, 19, 2001 hear ing and t h e i rinvolvement in th e c o n f l i c t . o ~ > { n t e r e s , t ~ i s s u e s t h a t keep recurr ing

~ \ ~ , : . , ... ' ;-r '; ' ,. . .because of the Cour t ' s c o n t i , r i u ~ d appointment of conf l i c ted a t to rneys

al igned with Defendan t ' s adve,rsar ies in these proceed ings .Judge Cooper 's July ,18, '2001"orde.:r, as an t i c ip a t ed and as

sp ec i ca l ly l i s t e d in th e .. d o c ~ ~ 4 4 0 f i l i n g , were made irrnnediatelybefore th e Ju ly 19, 2011 h e a ~ { ~ g and were c lea r ly made to s e t up th eJuly 19, 2011 hear ing to a l l o w ~ h e presen ta t ion of only one s ide ofa s tory from an extremely conf l i c ted a t to rney t h a t i s expected toprovide f a l s e , bu t unsworn, ' s , t ' ~ t ~ m e n t s i ~ t ~ the record of the hearing

. . . 7 - ~ ~ j . ; . , : : ~ ~ . ~ , "l

t o p r o t ec t t h e i n t e r e s t s 0 Mr. ' 0 ' Brien , Judge Cooper, and very good'II \'iends and as soc ia tes ofl t h ~ ~ ~ t ~ o i n d i v i d u a l s . The Defendant

would have been able to r e f ~ t ~ "the , fa l se s ta tements Mr. O'Brien i s,


3/7

need to occur to have these 'p roceed ings r i va l th e most infamouslyunj u s t t r i a l of the Sanhedr in ' i s / to holct these proceedings a t night .I t i s c l ea r the c loud darkness i s used to purpose ly keep th e t ru thout of these proceed ings . Defendant ' s f r auds te r accusers , bes ideshaving c lose r e l a t i o n s h ip s with members o f t h i s Court , have beeninvolved in numerous f r a u d u l ~ p t ~ a c t i v ~ t i e s with a market value inth e b i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s . Defendant ' s f r auds te r accuse r ' sa c t i v i t i e s have been covered by na t iona l and i n t e rna t iona l media.Clear ly t he re i s s i g n i f persona l and f 1 i n t e r e s t inensuring th e outcome the$e, proceedings i s anything but j u s t .

The Cour't has been g iven ' record not ice o f Mr. 0 ' Br ien ' s own words\'in the audio c l ip spec i f l y ~ r e f e r e n c e d and incorpora ted in the

doc.418 f i l i ng of t h i s case . ' Th i s f i l i ng gives t h i s Court ac tua lnot ice of not only some of t h ~ c o ~ f l i c t of i n t e r e s t i s sues discussedand of Mr. O'Br ien ' s concerris about presen t ing v a l id and supported

"i s sues re l a t ed to h is f r i ~ n d s ' a n d J u d g e Cooper, b ut a lso of Mr.0 ' Br ien ' s l ack ing l eg a l unders tanding o f th e s o f these

f" " .proceedings.The Court has a pursuan t to the 5 th and 6th Amendments (Due

" \'Process and Assi s tance o f ~ o t i r i ~ ~ l ' C l a u s e s ) to allow Defendant th eopportuni ty to presen t evidence of Mr. 0 ' Br ien ' s conf l o fi n t e r e s t , o f Mr. 0 ' Br , s incb,mp"btence; and of Mr. 0 ' 's r e fusa lto communicate and coope with t h i s Defendan t ' s The

"i s sues have r e s u l t ed i n the impt6per ac t ions and th e avoidance ofac t ions he lp fu l t o Defendan t ' s d e f e n ~ b Y Mr. O'Brien and others .

:3 o f 7 '



4/7

Some of the se i tems have occur redou t s ide the presence of Judge Cooperand the re fo re cannot be resoJ.ved without an ev iden t i a ry hearing .

, ,Br igug l i o v . Uni ted S ta tes , 675F . 2d 81, 82 (3d Cir . 1982) (holdingev iden t i a ry hear ing was requi red to determine if "counse l laboredunder an ac tua l conf l i c t of i n t e r e s t , whether any such c onf l i c t mayhave a f fec ted th e adequacy of , :his r ep resen ta t ion ) ; see also Uni tedStates v. McLain, 823 F . 2d1457 , 1463-64 (11th Ci r . 1987) (holdingt ha t when t r i a l counse l was under inves t iga t ion an ac tua l c onf l i c to f i n t e r e s t e x i s t e d ) .

"A defendan t ' s Six th Amendment r i gh t to counsel inc ludes, '} ,a r i gh t to c o n f l i c t - f ~ e e ' r e p r e s e n t a t i o n . " Uni ted Statesv. Rogers, 209 F.3d 139, ,143 (2d Cir .2000) ; see a l so Woodv. Georgia, 450 U.S. 2 6 1 ~ 2 7 1 , 101 S.Ct . 1097 ,67 L.Ed.2d220 (1981) ("Where a c ons t i t u t i ona l r i gh t t o counse lex i s t s , our Six th Amendment cases hold t ha t t he re i s ac o r r e l a t i ve r i g h t to rep t ;esenta t ion t h a t i s f ree fromc onf l i c t s of i n t e r e s t . If)";' 'Uni ted Sta tes v. Levy, 25 F. 3d146, 152 (2d Cir .1994) (9ame). Asse r t ions of the r i gh tto conf l i c t - f r ee c o u n s e l ~ a r e of four d i f r en t va r i e t i e s :(a) t h a t th e d i s ~ r i c t , c o u r t ' s knowledge of a poss ib l e

c onf l i c t imposed upon it a duty of inqui ry ; (b) t h a t therewas a "per sen conf l i c t ; (c) ' t ha t the re was an a c t u a lconf l i c t ; and (d) t h a t t he re was a po t e n t i a l c on f l i c t .Judge Cooper 's sona l "bias show s Court , wi thout r s t

r e so lv ing the doc.385 f i l i ng in t h i s case , has ignored th e mandates

of the Due Process Clause of the 5 th and Assis tance of Counsel Clause6ththe Amendments of the, ,Cpnst i t u t ~ o n , and has i n s t ead ignored

-and even re fused the p r e ~ e n t a t i o n o f - - evidence to support thenumerous conf l i c t s o f i n t e r ~ s t i s sues and th e incompetence of counse lin t h i s case ,

For a l l of th e above. r y a } ~ o n s " and ~ p o s e t h a t would have been, P?ge" 4 of 7:5lt

, '.71 "



5/7

presen ted if Judge Cooper 'hadial lowed the presen ta t ion of evidenceto fu r ther support the j ud i c i a l b ias which con t r ibu tes s ign i f i can t ly

1 , _ ~ . " , ,

to the recurr ing c onf l i c t of i 'n teres t i s sues t ha t have been presentwhile t h i s case has been under . t h e c o n t r o l and d i rec t ion of JudgeCooper, t h i s Court should:

(A) Reconsider and c l a r i f ~ i t s recent doc.443 order ,(B) Stay a l l revocat ion proceedings u n t i l a f t e r evident ia ry

hear ings can be held to resolve the numerous t roubl ing 5 th and6th Amendment Right 'viciJ}ations and ensure they do not cont inueto i n f e c t these p r ~ c e ~ d ~ n g s ,

(C) Remove conf l i c t ed q o u ~ s ~ l 'Dennis C. O'Brien,(D) Remove a l l home confinement and bond condi t i ons , except those

requir ing cour t appea' lances, from t h i s Defendant ,(E) Rehold th e prelimir:a 'rY'hearing of these proceedings because

it fa i led to meet t h ~ requirements o f th e 5 th and 6th AmendmentRights and th e R e q u i r e m e n t s ~ o f Federa l Criminal Rule 32.1,and

, ' .' I (F) Immediately recuse .Jud$e Clarence Cooper and any othe r judgeknown to have c l o s ~ r e i a t i o ~ s h i p s to the adverse par t ie s in

'.-:t h i s case . Th e case ~ , h o u l d b e removed to the Washington, DC" . " ) " < I ~ ~ ,', ' . t;, ::,"d i s t r i c t to be f u r t h e ; I ; ' ~ ' r e v i e w e d 'by unbiased judges and the,l,,',. : " i i , ' , ~ " Government Corrupt io 'nUnit of the U. S. Department of Jus t i ce .. "

, ,



6/7

19 thThis day of Ju ly 2 0 1 1 ~

submit ted ,.. R ~ ~ " U l " l Y

. " '" ', ( :Sco t t Hintz

. 6025 Sandy Springs #258Sandy Spr ings , GA 30328(404)665-3553

,I'

,

, l

q ,"PagE;"l6of 7



7/7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI, Scott Hintz, certify I have served upon: AUSA Leslie J. Abrams 600 U.S. Courthouse 75 Spring Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 A true copy of the foregoing filing. This 19th day of July 2011 by hand-delivering same to AUSA Abrams' office. Respectfully,

, ./ ,

, >,

. ,/" .,.

"P ~ g e , 7 o f 7


attorney dennis c. o'brien

Documents