dennis c. o'brien actual conflict of interest. removal requested

8/6/2019 Dennis C. O'Brien actual conflict of interest. Removal requested.

1/20

I N THE U N I T ED STATES D I S T R I C T COURTFOR THE NORTHERN D I S T R I C T OF GEORGIA

A T L A N T A D I V I S I O N* L 2 8 2011

U N I T ED STATES OF AME R I C A,P l a i n t i f f ,V . N o. 1 : 0 3 - C R - 1 3 1 - C C - J F K - C C HEMERGENCY HEARING REQUESTED

SCOTT H I N T Z , )D e f e n d a n t )

MOTION TO REMOVE CONFLICTED COUNSEL AND CRIMINAL DEFENDANT,DENNIS C. O^BRIEN, FOR ACTUAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFIDAVIT, ANDREQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY HEARING BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KING

NOW COMES S c o t t H i n t z and r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s l e a v e to f i l e :t h i s M o t i o n to r e m o v e a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n as c o u n s e l and toh o l d an i m m e d i a t e e m e r g e n c y h e a r i n g b e f o r e M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e K i n g tor e v i s i t J u d g e K i n g ' s b o n d and home c o n f i n e m e n t o r d e r s to a l l o wD e f e n d a n t to p a r t i c i p a t e i n P r o Se m a t t e r s a g a i n s t D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e na n d o t h e r s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h h i m . D e f e n d a n t has Pro Se c i v i l andc r i m i n a l c l a i m s to p u r s u e a g a i n s t M r . O ' B r i e n and t h o s e a s s o c i a t e dw i t h h i m . J u d g e K i n g ' s c u r r e n t o r d e r s l i m i t D e f e n d a n t ' s a b i l i t y toc o n d u c t the n e c e s s a r y i n q u i r y to f u r t h e r D e f e n d a n t ' s s i g n i f i c a n tC o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t s i n c i v i l and c r i m i n a l p r o c e e d i n g s . T h e s ei m p a i r e d C o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t s a r e a f f e c t i n g t h i s c a s e and a r e a l s o

a f f e c t i n g c a s e s o u t s i d e the j u r i s d i c t i o n of t h i s C o u r t .C r i m i n a l d e f e n d a n t D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n , i s w e l l a w a r e of the

c r i m i n a l c h a r g e s f i l e d a g a i n s t him f o r t h e c r i m e s he has c o m m i t t e da g a i n s t h i s own c l i e n t , S c o t t H i n t z , and Mr. O ' B r i e n i s a l s o w e l la w a r e t h e c r i m e s h a v e b e e n d o c k e t e d f o r a c r i m i n a l c o u r t p r o c e e d i n g s

P a g e 1 of 7

Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC -CCH Document 460 Filed 07/28/11 Page 1 of 20


2/20

a g a i n s t D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n ; see and h e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e the a t t a c h e dE x h i b i t A e m a i l s .

T h i s D e f e n d a n t has r e q u e s t e d D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n b r i n g to t h i sC o u r t ' s i m m e d i a t e a t t e n t i o n t h e i t e m s l i s t e d i n d o c . 4 4 9 , d o c . 4 5 8 (seea n d h e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e E x h i b i t B) and t h i s d o c u m e n t , but D e n n i s C.O ' B r i e n has r e f u s e d to do so. O b v i o u s l y , b r i n g i n g t h e s e i t e m s tot h i s C o u r t ' s a t t e n t i o n w o u l d f u r t h e r i l l u m i n a t e t h e c r i m i n a l c o n d u c to f Mr. O ' B r i e n a g a i n s t h i s own c l i e n t and w o u l d r e v e a l h i s m a l i c i o u sa t t e m p t s to o b s t r u c t j u s t i c e to h e l p Mr. O ' B r i e n ' s v e r y g o o df r a u d s t e r f r i e n d s . T h i s i s a t e s t - b o o k example of an ' ^ a c t u a l "c o n f l i c t of i n t e r e s t . Mr. O ' B r i e n has a l r e a d y l i e d to t h i s C o u r t ,l i e d to the G o v e r n m e n t and l i e d to h i s own c l i e n t i n h i s a t t e m p t st o h i d e h i s own c r i m i n a l c o n d u c t ; r e v i e w and h e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e thea u d i o c l i p s f o u n d at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QggJHkfP2Ia n d h t t p : / /www.yo u t u b e . com/watch?v=sGHfHMbuNqA as i f the a u d i oc l i p s , or t h e i r t r a n s c r i p t s , w e r e se t f o r t h at l e n g t h h e r e i n andh e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e and c o m p a r e the t r a n s c r i p t s of the J u l y 19, 2011h e a r i n g b e f o r e U.S. D i s t r i c t C o u r t C l a r e n c e C o o p e r i n t h i s c a s e .T h i s C o u r t was made a w a r e D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n w o u l d p r e s e n t f a l s e ,a l b e i t u n s w o r n , s t a t e m e n t s to the C o u r t i n the d o c . 4 4 4 , but t h i sD e f e n d a n t was d e n i e d t h e o p p o r t u n i t y to p r e s e n t e v i d e n c e t h a t D e n n i sC. O ' B r i e n w o u l d p r e s e n t f a l s e s t a t e m e n t s i n t o the r e c o r d of t h i sc a s e .

P a g e 2 of 7



3/20

AFFIDAVITI , S c o t t H i n t z , h e r e b y s t a t e u n d e r the p e n a l t y of p e r j u r y t h a t

t h e f o l l o w i n g are t r u e to the b e s t of my k n o w l e d g e and p u r s u a n t tot h e p e n a l t i e s of p e r j u r y p u r s u a n t to 28 USC S e c t i o n 1746:

( A) De n n i s C. O ' B r i e n has b e e n made a w a r e t h e r e are c r i m i n a lc h a r g e s f i l e d a g a i n s t him, and u p c o m i n g c r i m i n a l c o u r tp r o c e e d i n g s , f o r c r i m e s c o m mi t t e d by M r . O ' B r i e n a g a i n s t me.

( B) De n n i s C. O ' B r i e n has n o t , s i n c e I l a s t saw Mr. O ' B r i e n i nt h e US D i s t r i c t C o u r t on J u l y 19, 2011, c a l l e d me to d i s c u s smy c a s e and i t s d e f e n s e d e s p i t e my n u m e r o u s c a l l s ,v o i c e m a i l s , e m a i l s and m e s s a g e s to h i s o f f i c e s t a f f .

( C) De n n i s C. O ' B r i e n has not p r o v i d e d me c a s e m a t e r i a l s I h a v eb e e n r e q u e s t i n g of him s i n c e on or a r o u n d J u l y 5, 2011.

( D ) D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n h a s made s t a t e m e n t s I c o n s i d e r to be t h r e a t st o me and the d e f e n s e of my c a s e .

( E) D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n i s a w a r e I h a v e r e c e i v e d t h r e a t s f r o m p e o p l ea s s o c i a t e d w i t h Mr. O ' B r i e n and h i s v e r y g o o d f r i e n d s .

( F) D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n has r e f u s e d to m e e t w i t h me and lawe n f o r c e m e n t a g e n t s i n r e g a r d s to the i n v e s t i g a t i o n of p e o p l ea s s o c i a t e d w i t h D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n .

S t a t i n g the a b o v e are t r u e , I h e r e b y s t a t e the a b o v e t h i s 28^"^ dayo f J u l y 2011.

S c o t t H i n t zP a g e 3 of 7



4/20

S i n c e t h e l a s t h e a r i n g b e f o re J u dge C l a r e n c e C o o p e r , c r i m i n a lc h a r g e s h a v e b e e n f i l e d a g a i n s t a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n a n dc r i m i n a l c o u r t p r o c e e d i n g s h a v e b e g u n a g a i n s t D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n .Th e i n v e s t i g a t i o n i s o n - g o i n g a n d M r . O ' B r i e n i s w o r k i n g a s a ne f f e c t i v e ^ g a t e k e e p e r ' t o t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s a g a i n s t h i m s e l f B E C A U S Eo f M r . O ' B r i e n ' s p o s i t i o n a s a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l i n t h i s c a s e . M r .O ' B r i e n h a s t h e a b i l i t y t o k e e p t h i s D e f e n d a n t ' s f i l i n g s o u t o f t h i sr e c o r d t o p r o t e c t t h e i n t e r e s t s o f M r . O ' B r i e n a n d h i s c l o s ea s s o c i a t e s . M r . O ' B r i e n h a s t h e a b i l i t y t o s w a y f a v o r f o r M r .O ' B r i e n a n d h i s a s s o c i a t e s b e c a u s e o f h i s i n s e r t e d p o s i t i o n w i t h i nt h i s c a s e ; s e e United States v. McLain, 8 2 3 F . 2 d 145 7 , 1 46 3 - 6 4 ( 1 1 t hC i r . 1 9 8 7 ) ( h o l d i n g t h a t w h e n c o u n s e l w a s u n d e r i n v e s t i g a t i o n a na c t u a l c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t e x i s t e d ) .

Th e C o u r t h a s a d u t y p u r s u a n t t o t h e 5 * a n d 6* A me n d m e n t s ( Du eP r o c e s s a n d A s s i s t a n c e o f C ou n s e l C l a u s e s ) t o a l l o w D e f e n d a n t t h eo p p o r t u n i t y t o p r e s e n t e v i d e n c e o f Mr . O ' B r i e n ' s a c t u a l a n d p o t e n t i a lc o n f l i c t s o f i n t e r e s t , o f M r . O ' B r i e n ' s i n c o m p e t e n c e , a n d o f Mr .O ' B r i e n ' s r e f u s a l t o c o m m u n i c a t e a n d c o o p e r a t e w i t h t h i s D e f e n d a n t ' sd e f e n s e a n d e v e n o f M r . O ' B r i e n ' s t h r e a t s t o t a k e t h i n g s i n t o h i sow n h a n d s i f D e f e n d a n t d o e s n o t b a c k d o w n a g a i n s t t h e v e r y c l o s ea s s o c i a t e s o f D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n . T h e i s s u e s h a v e r e s u l t e d i n t h ei m p r o p e r a c t i o n s o f M r . O ' B r i e n a n d Mr . O ' B r i e n ' s w i l l f u l a v o i d a n c eo f h i s l e g a l d u t i e s t o a s s i s t D e f e n d a n t ' s d e f e n s e b y Mr . O ' B r i e n - i nf a c t , M r . O ' B r i e n h a s w i l l f u l l y g o n e o u t o f h i s w a y t o c a u s e h a r mt o D e f e n d a n t a n d D e f e n d a n t ' s c a s e . Some o f t h e s e i t e m s h a v e o c c u r r e d

P a g e 4 o f 7



5/20

o u t s i d e t h e p r e s e n c e o f J u d g e C o op e r a n d t h e r e f o r e c a n n o t b e r e s o l v e dw i t h o u t a n e v i d e n t i a r y h e a r i n g . Briguglio v. United States, 6 7 5 F . 2 d8 1 , 8 2 ( 3 d C i r . 1 9 8 2 ) ( h o l d i n g e v i d e n t i a r y h e a r i n g w a s r e q u i r e d t od e t e r m i n e i f " c o u n s e l l a b o r e d u n d e r a n a c t u a l c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t ,w h e t h e r a n y s u c h c o n f l i c t ma y h a v e a f f e c t e d t h e a d e q u a c y o f h i sr e p r e s e n t a t i o n ) .

" A d e f e n d a n t ' s S i x t h A m e n d m e n t r i g h t t o c o u n s e l i n c l u d e sa r i g h t t o c o n f l i c t - f r e e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n . " United StatesV. Rogers, 2 09 F. 3 d 1 3 9 , 1 4 3 ( 2 d C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) ; s e e a l s o WoodV. Georgia, 4 5 0 U. S. 2 6 1 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 1 S . C t . 1 0 9 7 , 67 L . E d . 2 d2 2 0 ( 1 98 1 ) ( " W h e r e a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t t o c o u n s e le x i s t s , o u r S i x t h A m e n d m e n t c a s e s h o l d t h a t t h e r e i s ac o r r e l a t i v e r i g h t t o r e p r e s e n t a t i o n t h a t i s f r e e f r o mc o n f l i c t s o f i n t e r e s t . " ) ; United States v. Levy, 2 5 F . 3 d1 4 6 , 1 5 2 ( 2 d C i r . 1 9 9 4 ) ( s a m e ) . A s s e r t i o n s o f t h e r i g h tt o c o n f l i c t - f r e e c o u n s e l a r e o f f o u r d i f f e r e n t v a r i e t i e s :( a ) t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ' s k n o w l e d g e o f a p o s s i b l e

c o n f l i c t i m p o s e d u p o n i t a d u t y o f i n q u i r y ; ( b ) t h a t t h e r ew a s a " p e r s e " c o n f l i c t ; ( c ) t h a t t h e r e w a s a n a c t u a lc o n f l i c t ; a n d ( d ) t h a t t h e r e w a s a p o t e n t i a l c o n f l i c t .D e f e n d a n t r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s t h i s C o u r t h o l d a n i m m e d i a t e

e m e r g e n c y h e a r i n g t o r e m o v e c o n f l i c t e d c o u n s e l , a n d c r i m i n a ld e f e n d a n t D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n ; a n d t h e C o u r t h o l d a n i m m e d i a t e l ye m e r g e n c y h e a r i n g t o m o d i f y t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f J u d g e K i n g ' s b o n d a n dhome c o n f i n e m e n t o r d e r s t o e n s u r e D e f e n d a n t ' s s i g n i f i c a n t

c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t s a r e n o l o n g e r i m p a i r e d w i t h u n d u e p r e j u d i c e( s p e c i f i c a l l y i t i s r e q u e s t e d t h a t J u d g e K i n g r e m o v e a l l c o n d i t i o n s ,

w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n o f t h e c o n d i t i o n t o a p p e a r f o r C o u r t a p p e a r a n c e s ,s o D e f e n d a n t c a n b e i n v o l v e d w i t h i n v e s t i g a t i o n s a g a i n s t c o n f l i c t e dc o u n s e l D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n a n d o t h e r s ) .

P a g e 5 o f 7



6/20

^ ^ e s p e c t f u l

^ c o t t H i n t z^25 Sa n d y Sn^.'

P a g e 6 o f 7



7/20

I, ScottHintz,certifylhaveservedupon:AUSALeslieJ. Abrams600 U.S. Courthouse75 Spring Street, SWAtlanta, G A 30303A true copy ofthe foregoing filing.This 28thdayof July 20Uby hand-delivering

Respectfully,



8/20

From: Scott HintzDate: Thu, 28M 2011 15:12:18To : Leslie J. Abrams; William ToUverReply-To: Scott HmtzCc: Li sa Moore; Shelley Jones; Dennis C.0'Brien; Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C.0'Brien Page |Subject: Continuing threats X 2M s. Abrams andM r. Tohver,I continue to receive threats. I attempted to talk to M r. OBrien today and for the first time since I sawhim in the Federal Russellbuilding the day of my last hearing before Judge Cooper.M r . O'Brien is aware he is a criminal defendant for fi led criminal charges against him related to crimes he has committed againstme. M r. O'Brien hung up on me, but not before he refused to meet with me at a law enforcement office today at 2pm, and notbefore he threatened to take my case into his own hands.I am concerned that M r. O'Brien has Ued to the Court, has lied to the Government and has l ied to me. Apparently to help his verygood friendand their associates avoid scrutiny. I am also concerned about M r . O'Brien's active attempts to keep pertinentinformation out ofthe record ofthe case-especially i f it helps my case or hurts M r. O'Brien or his raudster riends. M r. O'Briencontinues to refuse to send me my case materials and has refused to talk to me on the phone except for the brief interaction a fewmoments agobefore he hung up on me.Please contact me directly.Scott Hmtz

From: Scott HintzDate: Thu, 28 Ju l 2011 14:51:26To: Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C.0'BrienReply-To: Scott K n t zSubject: Your refusal to communicate with me - reply immediately

Y ou assistantacknowledged your receipt of my calls and mymessages to you. I just tried to talk to you to explain weneed tomeet witti law enforcement at 2pm today.Per my call to you a moment ago, you are aware that criminal charges have been fi led against you and that you are a criminaldefendant with an upcoming court hearing related to the crimes you have committed against me. Further, and before youhungup on me,you threatened to not involve me in my own defense. Y ou have absolutely refused to provide me my case materials,you have absolutely refused to talk to me, and you have purposely hed to people about your true mahcious interests in my case.I, again, demand you stop cooperating with your raudster riends. The death threats and other threats have been welldocumented, but you continue as if you beheve you are above the law.1 request you immediately reply and let me know whether or not you will be meeting me today at 2pm at the Sandy SpringsPolice Department Obviously, we can discuss whatever weneed to in one of their offices or in the lobby. Please bring al l of thecase materials and information I requested in my last email to you.I consider you an adverse party with illegal intentions.Scott Hintz

3f

M r. O'Brien,

Exhibit A



9/20

From: Scott HintzDate: Ur n . 28 M 2011 03:15:19To : Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dermis C0'BrienReply-To: Scott HintzSubject: No call and no replyM r. O'Brien,I have still not received a call from you, I have not received a reply in regards to important matters, and I have not received myclient materials. Y ou have refused to help get Judge King modify her orders to allow the criminal investigations against yourfriend and his associates to move forward in the state court.You have also maliciously acted to help them in several other ways. Y ou have refused to talk to me and other agents about theillegal activities surrounding those involved in bringing false allegations against me. Your criminal case has been scheduled for acourt hearing.

I very specifically request you re-submit my Pro Se filings immediately. I have submitted doc.449 and doc.458 to have therecord reflect the criminal cases against you, to reflect your serious conflicts of interest,and to reflect your refusal to talk andcooperate with me. I specifically demand you resubmit the Pro Se items immediately andrequestan immediate court hearingbefore Judge King on these items. Additionally, there is more evidence that needs to be submitted to evidence your acts.I can meet you at the Sandy Springs PoUce Department at 2pm tomorrow to receive my case materials or you can have al l myitems sent to this email address or you can send everything to me via overnight mail to the address I have listed on P A C E R .Please confirmyou will be at the Sandy Springs Police Department at 2pm tomorrow, otherwise I will understand you arevwllflilly ignoring my interests agairrScott Hntz

From: Scott HintzDate: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:49:24To : Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C. 0'Brien; Dennis C.0'BrienReply-To: Scott HntzSubject: Urgent - reply A S A PM r. O'Brien,A s you are aware, you are a criminal defendant in a supported case docketed for your probable cause hearing related to thecrimes you have committed against me.I have not received a call from you, nor have I talked to you since the day we were last in court before Judge Clarence Cooper. Ihave requested case materials and a call from you nearly every day since your appointment on July 5,2011. I have alsorequestedyou get permission romJudge King for me to pursue investigations against your very good friend, Jerome Froehch,and his associates (the investigations would reveal their criminal acts and falsestatements in my case #1:03-CR-l 31 -C C andwould prove my innocence in both the underlying case and the revocation). Y ou have refused to do so, to date.Y ou have been provided credible evidence ofthe death and other threats against me (including some showing this raudstergroupis using you for help against me), but youhave not moved to get an I M M E D I A T E audience on these matters. In fact, you tried todiscourage me from reporting the crimes with your veiled threats.

Page I

Exhibit A



10/20

I have not heard back from you about meeting at the Sandy Springs Police Department at 2pm today. I want my case materialsimmediately. Please confirm you will bring A L L o f m y client case file and its related materials and notes to the Sandy SpringsPolice Department today at 2pm.Also , please provide the complete names, addresses and contact information for any person who has worked on my case withyou. I need this information inmiediately fo r the criminal investigations against you.

Page J I, again, am demanding yo u resubmit aU of my Pro Sefilingrequestsinto the record of my case #1:03-CR-131-CC (especially ^ doc.449 and doc.458 which specifically relate to your removal as counsel f o r A C T U A L conflicts of interest). Please resubmit j 0these items immediately. The recordmust reflect you are a criminal defendant for a docketed case that is scheduled to have ahearing regarding the crimes you have committed against me to purposely damage mydefense and to purposely interfere with myconstitutional ights(your actions and failures to perform your duties also help your very good fiiend, and his associates, avoidcriminal scrutiny).Scott Hmtz

Exhibit A



11/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131 - C C - C C H = Document 458 Filed07/27/1

I N THE DNITEI5'-%TATES D I S T R I C T COURTFOR THE NORTHER N-D ISTR ICT OF GEORGIA

JUL 272011Jj^MS N . H A T T E N , C L E R K

U N I T E D STATES OF AME R I C A, ' ' )P l a i n t i f f , ... ),,

SCOTT H I N T Z,D e f e n d a n t

N o, 1:03~CR-131-CG~-.JFK-CCHEMERGENCY HEARING REQtJESTED

MOTION IH SUgpQRT OF RENEWED RSQtTSST TO REMOVE CONFLICTED COUtTSELDENNIS C. O^BRIEN mP FOR IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY HE&RINGNOW COMES S c o t t H i n t z ' a r v c l ' , r e s p e c t f u l l y r e q u e s t s l e a v e to f i l e :

M o t i o n i n s u p p o r t of th e J u l y ? 22",.. 2011 r e n e w e d r e q u e s t to h o l d ani i D i n e d i a t e e m e r g e n c y h e a r i n g t o ' r e m o v e c o n f l i c t e d a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C.O ' B r i e n a n d t o i m m e d i a t e l y m o d a f y t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f M a g i s t r a t e J u d g eK i n g ' s b o n d and home c o n f i n e m e n t o r d e r s to e n s u r e D e f e n d a n t ' ss i g n i f i c a n t c o n s t i t u t i o n a l : o r d e r s a r e no l o n g e r i m p a i r e d w i t h u n d u ep r e j u d i c e . A n y d e l a y i n a d d r e s s i n g t h e s e i s s u e s g a l l o w s c o n f l i c t e da t t o r n e y D e n n i s C, O ' B r i e n t o --- c o n t i n u e t o ' u s e h i s " g a t e k e e p e r ' r o l e - t - - f - ^

1 ^

t o the advantage of h i s f r a u d s t e r f r i e n d s and to t h e d e t r i m e n t oft h i s D e f e n d a n t . Mr. O ' B r i e n Ras.ius.ed.hi's a p p o i n t m e n t to a l l e g e her e p r e s e n t s t h e i n t e r e s t ' o f t h i s D e f e n d a n t w h e n , i n f a c t , he i s s i m p l yf i s h i n g f o r i n f o r m a t i o n and a t t e m p t i n g ' to p r e j u d i c e t h i s c a s

f^^jOr of his fraudster f j n ^ - ' -

Q

5e an

' . .Uagedtohavecor.ittedc.x.esO' B r i e n.-^^-.^^^"^^ . . . d e r s a f f e c t

,\51

i nor:

o5Vt



12/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC - C Q H ' Document 458 Filed 07/27/11 Page 2 of 5

h i m , are s u p p o r t e d w i t h e v i d e n c e a n d ..testimony. The i n v e s t i g a t i o no f the c r i m e s a g a i n s t a t . t . n r - n f y l ' n p n n l ? -X.. "'O^'Brien w i l l r o q ^ a i r c ctm o d i f i c a t i o n of Magi s t r a t e,-^gu d ge K i n g ' s b o n d and hcm.e c o n f i n e m e n tc o n d i t i o n s . A t t o r n e y D e n n i s :'C; O ' B r i e n i s a w a r e of J u d g e K i n g ' so r d e r s , but w i l l not r e q u e s t Judg e-,-King.modif y the o r d e r s b e c a u s ed o i n g so w o u l d be c o n t r a r y t p ^ t h e " p e r s o n a l , i n t e r e s t of a t t o r n e y D e n n i s

iffC. O ' B r i e n . D e f e n d a n t h a s L i r i ' a d e a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n a w a r e oft h i s u r g e n t r e q u e s t and has a d d i t i o n a l l y a l e r t e d the G o v e r n m e n t tot h e s e c o n c e r n s ; see and h e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e the e m a i l l i s t e d i nE x h i b i t A, , .. . -

A d d i t i o n a l l y , Defenda.|i# c o n t i n u e s to r e c e i v e t h r e a t s i n c l u d i n gsome t h a t i n c l u d e t h e use of a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n . D e n n i s C.O ' B r i e n i s an a d m i t t e d l y v e r y c l o s e p e r s o n a l f r i e n d of oneor mo r eo f t h i s D e f e n d a n t ' s f r a u d s t e r : , a c - c u s e r ' s . D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n l i e da b o u t n u m e r o u s i t e m s i n c q u t t b e f o r e J u d g e C o op e r d u r i n g the J u l y1 9 , 2011 h e a r i n g - S i n c e J u l y ; ' ! ' ? ; ' ' 'a ' D l l , a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e nh a s a b s o l u t e l y r e f u s e d to t a l k v > l t h t h ' i ' s D e f e n d a n t and h a s , to d a t e ,s t i l l not p r o v i d e d D e f e n d a n t ": w . i t h any'-of the c a s e f i l e m a t e r i a l sd e f e n d a n t has r e q u e s t e d ,,pf ' . ' a t t o r n e y D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n . Theg o v e r n m e n t h a s a l s o b e e n a l e r t e d ' o f " t h e D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n ' s t r o u b l i n ga c t i v i t i e s . D e n n i s C. O ' S r i e h has^ l i e d to t h i s D e f e n d a n t , theG o v e r n m e n t , and t o t h i s Court:; " r e v i e w ' and h e r e i n i n c o r p o r a t e thea u d i o c l i p s f o u n d a t : h t t p : 7 / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m/ w a t c h ? v = 3 Q g gJ Hk f P 2 Ia n d h t t p : //www. y o u t u b e > GOm/w'atch?v-=sGHf HMbuMgA as i f the a u d i oc l i p s , or t h e i r t r a n s c r i p t s ' ; '^^ere j s e t ' - f o r t h at l e n g t h h e r e i n .



13/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC - C C H V Document 458 Filed 07/27/11 Page 3 of 5 - ' ; i -

D e f e n d a n t r e s p e c t f u l l y l v r e q u e s t s t h i s C o u r t h o l d an i m m e d i a t e- e m e r g e n c y h e a r i n g t o immed'iately-'-'remove c o n f l i c t e d c o u n s e l D e n n i sC. O ' B r i e n , a n d t h e C o u r t i i r a r i e d i a t e l y m od i f y t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f J u d g eK i n g ' s b o n d and home c o n f i n e m e n t ' o r d e r s to e n s u r e D e f e n d a n t ' ss i g n i f i c a n t c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t s a r e no l o n g e r i m p a i r e d w i t h u n d u ep r e j u d i c e ( s p e c i f i c a l l y i t ; i s . ' r e q u e s t e d t h a t J u d g e K i n g remove, a l lc o n d i t i o n s , w i t h t h e e x c e p t i b i i -of t h e c o n d i t i o n t o a p p e a r f o r C ou r ta p p e a r a n c e s , so D e f e n d a n t can'" b e ' i n v o l v e d w i t h i n ^ / e s t i g a t i o n sa g a i n s t c o n f l i c t e d c o u n s e l D e n n i s C. O ' B r i e n ) .

T h i s 27*" day of J u l y 2 01 1. ;.

R e s p e c t f u i l y s u b m i t t e d .

' S c o t t , H i n t z\ 6025 S a n d y S p r i n g s #25? "S a n d y S p r i n g s , GA 3032J

(404') 6 6 5 - 3 5 5 3

X

^A

O

* - v . - .

Page-_3,.;of 4



14/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131 - C C -CQMU Document 458 Filed07/27/11 Page 4 of 5

I, Scott Hintz, certify I have served upgl^^'A U S A Leslie J. Abrams ~ ' \ ^600 U . S . Courthouse ' '75 Spring Street, SW " " ' , s .Atlanta, G A 30303 ' . . A true copy ofthe foregoing filing. " X^'"". s This 27th day of M y 2011 by hand-delivering same to A U S A Abrams' off ic e.Respectfully, .'\ ' '

Pager4 o f 4,



15/20


From: Scott Hintz .Date: Wed, 27 Jul2011 II:45;56To: Dermis C . 0'BrieB; Dermis C .0'Brien; Denpis G , 0'BrienReply-To: Scott HintzSubject: Need motion presented this morning. Ca l l me immediately.M r . O'Brien, , 'I need to be able to immediately cooperate with a criminal investigation of you. To be able to dot l i is , I am going to need to present a motion to the Atlanta U S District Court in my case #1:03-C R - 1 3 1 . Obviously, 1 am unable to present this motion to the court to help with the criminalinvestigation against you because you are a "gatekeeper" to my case.I need you to cal l me immediately and to immediately present a motion I have for the Courttoday. If 1do not get a cal l immediately, I v^ill understand you are also going to use yourposition as my appointed attorney to obstruct with your own criminal investigation.Sc


16/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131-CC -CGH|:;jA:)Cijment4^ Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 5

UNITED S T A T E S DISTRICT C O U R T ^'^0//VN O R T H E R N ' DISTRICT OF G E O R G I A '' - ^ ^^Cf' ATLANTA.PIVISIQN

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R T C A ' J f - X / - * ' '-'^W-^^.^^iBrf^Pla int i ff * -^m^V. ,. ;., - " No.1:03-Cil-l31-CC-JFK-CCH

E M E R G E N C Y H E A R I N GS C O T ! " H IN T Z , ' ^Defendant . 'S '"*" ~ ' - '

R E N E W E D M O T I O N T O R E M O V E CONFI.ICTED C O U N S E LNow comes Scott Hintz and respectfiilly requests leave to f i le this renewed Mot ion to remove

conflicted attorney Demiis C. O'Br ien . In a f i l ing prior to and even during the July 19,201 ihearing before Judge Clarence Cooper, lS,^\dmt informed the Court that M r . O'Brien wouldpresent unsworn, but false, statements.into the record which M r . O'Brien did indeed do. Thecourt refused to accept available evidence i n d testimony suppoiting Defendant's allegations ofconflicts of interest and a maliciously incompetent defense meant to help M r, O'Brien's "verygood friend[s]". , A^'0u.-^ ' ' .

Since the July 19, 2011 hearing Deiuiis G;- O'Brien has continued to obstruct justice, hasrefused to communicate and cooperate,jvitli this Defendant, has absolutely refused to provideA N Y copies of case materials, and has'refused ;-ih aiiy meaningful way- to represent the interests

., -*i3v$-:''" : ,ofthis Defendant. As a result of Dennis pBrien's false statements, malicious acdons, andfailures to perform required duties to fepreseht^the-interestsbf this Defendant - this Defendant

' '"' .'if''/' .\ ,.has alleged and filed criminal charges ^ajnst'fiemiis C . O'Brien. A judge has referred die - */'"''-^"'S'-'t-i'investigation to criminal investigators for fixrther'crimnal' in^ ^ see and hereinincorporate attached Exhibit A. '''''^t^:.' ^ ft

/ ' Page 1 of 3



17/20

Case 1:03-cr-00131 - C C - C C H rebbti'mgnt449 Filed 07/22/11 Page 2 of 5

Deiinis C . O'Brien has effectively abanfionedDefendant, but even worse, M r . O'Brien is ableto use his appointment as-aii alleged a g p Qf,^is Defendant tcmialiciuusly-fc;hfornformationand find ways tosupport the interests of Pgf6ndant.'s fraudster accusers, who, not coincidentallv,include at least one "very good friend'' ol"Dermis G;'0'Bnen.

I, Scott Hintz, hereby state under the penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U S C Section 1746 that thefollowing are true: , / " ; ; , ; ', 'Dennis C . O'Brien has refased to talk to me, he has refused to provide me any case materials, he

... ' ' '. : " '

has refused to meet to discuss and prepare :6rmy case, and he has refused to represent myinterests to pursue income opportunities and religious obligations outside the existing homeconfinement schedule which requires a,retum,home by 9pm,I state the above are true this 22"** day'df Julv 2 0 U t . - '

.Hintz . ; CQNGLU^ION

In light of the above, in light of the evidence already ih tile record, and in consideration of> - ' . ' '

the additional evidence that will be presented into the record, in open court,provided thisCourt does not refuse to accept evidence' andtestimony insupport of the claimsthis Courtshould immediately hold an immediate liearing to,remove conflicted attorney Dennis C . O'Brien,and should immediately remove all Home cbnfinenSnt' and bond requirements currentlyinterfering with Defendant's ability to'puj;^^'income arid religious obligations, and interferingwith Defendant's ability to pursue a defehs|:'f6V him^^ and pursue investigations related to thecriminal and c i v i l acts affecdng Defendants riglits',

Page 2 of 3 -.



18/20

Case1:03-Gr-00131-CC ,.CqH^boeymem^^ Filed 07/22/11 Page 3of 5

Respectfully submitted this 22"" day.of | | j j ^ o i l . ' :P/A .

Scott Hintz6025 SatJdy Springs Qrcle #258 , H(0'''Sandy Springs, G A 30328 ^(404)665-3553



19/20

case 1:03.o,00131-CC - C C ^ m & ' l t 'Filed 07/22/11 Page 4 of 5

RospeclAUy submitted this 22 ^ day of j i^ l l^Ol ' i : ' ;^

Scott Hintz i t p -6025 Sandy Springs Ci r c l e #258Sandy Springs, G A 30328 - '(404) 665-3553 ' ' '

1,1 '

C

^^y-'h^^ 3 . o f 3



20/20

Case 1:03 cf-00131 - C C -Gp^|?Dcumeqt;ff49 Filed 07/22/11 Page 5 of 5

APPUCATION FOR WARR ANT IN C l i s f ^ K V\JARRANT NOCOBB COJNTr, Q m m D V - . m ^ x X POUCE CAS E NC

^ AND ADORESS O F A C C U S E D Uer^:

dennis c. o'brien actual conflict of interest. removal requested

Documents