background to forest certification and chain of custody

22
Background to Forest Certification HJ van Hensbergen SSC Forestry

Upload: omar-pidani

Post on 22-Nov-2014

588 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Background to Forest Certification

HJ van Hensbergen

SSC Forestry

Page 2: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Certification

• What is certification?An assurance mechanism to substantiate a claim.

• University Certificate is used to prove that a person has received the stated education.

• Medical Certificate is used to verify that a person is too sick to work.

Page 3: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Who can certify?• Anybody!!!• Self certification• Peer group certification (medical, legal,

professional foresters in the US.) • National certfication (BSA, SABS, SAQA)• International certification (EQMS, ISO, CE)• Certification should be credible.

– Nowadays anybody can buy a PhD certificate from a variety of unregistered universities for less than $100 dollars on the internet. It is a waste of $99.50 because for 50c you can print your own with the same level of credibility.

Page 4: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Origins of Forest Certification

• Certification introduced in response to unsustainable harvesting of old growth forests.– Ghana loss of 80% of tropical high forest in 50 years.– Phillipines converted from major exporter to major

importer of timber in 30 years.• Major issues include loss of biodiversity, unethical

treatment of indigenous peoples, sustainability of production.– Amazonian Indians.– Karen of Malaya & Burma– Spotted owl.

Page 5: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

The trigger to certification.

• Timber boycotts & protests.– NGOs saw these as

ineffective– Retailers were concerned

by the effect on customers.• Home Depot, Staples.

• NGOs saw government led efforts as ineffective.

Page 6: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Failed International Efforts

• UNCED Rio 1992– Convention on forests

• Montreal Process– Santiago declaration on criteria and indicators. Boreal and

Temperate Forests. Reporting System. (Not a set of instructions on how to stop forest loss.)

• Helsinki Process– Sustainable use of European forests

• ITTA, ITTO– Corruption in governments

• TFAP, UN, FAO – Institutional Failure

Page 7: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Creation of the FSC in 1993/94

• Alliance of NGOs and Big Businesses– Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, WWF, B&Q, Home

Depot and Others.

• Objectives– To promote sustainable and ethical forest management.– To promote the use of wood as an environmentally

sustainable ‘Green’ raw material in the competition with unsustainable resources like Oil, Cement, Coal, Metals.

Page 8: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

What is the FSC?

• International NGO• Membership Organisation

– Institutional and Individual Members.

• FSC International Centre (Bonn)– FSC Board

• FSC Secretariat• FSC AS• FSC GD

• FSC National Initiatives– Develop National Standards– Support FSC in the country

Page 9: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

How to achieve this

• Develop a system which gives forest derived products from well managed forests a market advantage over the alternatives.

• Develop a system which protects dealers in sustainable forest products from unfounded criticism of their practices from Social and Environmental NGOs.

Page 10: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Two Strategic Tools

• Development of Standards for Sustainable forest management.– Define SFM at the level of the FMU.

• Develop a system of Certification to recognise forest managers who are practicing SFM according to the requirements of the standard.– Independent third party auditing and emission of

compliance certificates.

Page 11: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Purpose of Certification.

• The purpose depends on who you are, relative to the process.– The certifying authority.– The certifying agency.– The business to be certified.– The consumer of the certified good.

Page 12: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Forest Certification Authorities

• Rainforest Alliance (Smartwood).• Soils Association (Woodmark).• Forestry Stewardship Council. • ISO (14000 Series).• CertforChile• CSA• Swiss Wood (Comite de Bois Suisse)• Plus Forest• And more than 150 more

Page 13: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Certifying Agencies

• Soils Association (Woodmark)• Societe Generale de Surveillance• Scientific Certification Systems• Rainforest Alliance• IMO• SKAL• SABS• CertforChile

Page 14: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

The Business to be certified.

• Forest Producers (Forest Management & COC & CW)– Timber– NTFP

• Primary converters (COC & CW)– Pulp mills– Primary saw mills – wet mills

• Secondary converters (COC & CW)– Dry mills– Paper mills– Cartonboard mills

• Manufacturers (COC & CW)– Furniture– Wallpaper

Page 15: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Consumers

• Primary Consumer Groups– Group of ‘95 companies in the UK

• Individual Primary consumers.– IKEA (1m cu.m. solid 3m cu.m. composites)– B & Q– Home Depot

• End users– Joe Public– Government Procurement Agencies

• Local & National

Page 16: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

What’s in it for me?

• Certifying Authority– Improvement in the management of forests.– Avoiding compliance/Association with competing

schemes.• Certifying Agency (Accredited Certifier/Auditor)

– Money.• The Certified Business

– Market Share, Image, Higher prices for products???• The consumer.

– The feelgood factor, No requirement for due diligence.

Page 17: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

What is certified?

• ‘Forest Management’ certification.– It is the management of the forest that is

certified.– The forest itself is not certified.– Products coming from a forest where the

management is certified may be sold with the FSC label.

Page 18: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Who gets certified?

• Managers of– Individual Forests FMUs– Individual processing plants– Parts of companies– Companies nationally– Companies internationally

• Group certification for small producers.• SLIMF certification

Page 19: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Chain of Custody

• System for verifying to the consumer that a labelled product originates from a certified forest.

• System to prevent fraudulent use of the FSC label.• Not a system to track timber. Information about the precise

origin of the timber is lost when it is passed to another link in the supply chain.

Page 20: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Certifying chains of custody.

• Chain of custody certification.– Pure chain of custody.

• Certification based on physical separation of certified from non certified materials during processing.

– Mixed Sources (certified and uncertified products)• Based on accounting for volumes of inputs and outputs.

– Proportional certification for mixed products, i.e. partially recycled paper.

Page 21: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

Limits to Chain of Custody

• An FSC label informs consumer that the source of the timber (or NTFP) is from a certified forest.

• The label does not contain information about which certified forest it comes from.– Generally it is not possible to obtain this information

from the system.

• Some FSC labelled products will contain material from many certified forests.

Page 22: Background to forest certification and chain of custody

FLEGT Timber tracking and COC

• Fundamental difference between timber tracking and FSC COC control.

• For timber tracking knowledge of the origin and location of every log or even piece is important.

• For COC only risks of mixing, or substitution of certified and uncertified timber is important.

• Requirements for timber tracking systems are theoretically much more strict than requirements for FSC COC systems.