barber letter to secretary of state
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
1/199
04031-0078/LEGAL124271471.2
Kevin J. Hamilton
D. (206) 359-8741
F. (206) 359-9741
November 21, 2014
HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Ken BennettSecretary of State
1700 W. Washington Street, Fl. 7
Phoenix, AZ 85007-2808
Re: Errors and Omissions in Pima County and Cochise County Certification
Dear Mr. Bennett:
On behalf of the Ron Barber for Congress campaign, I write to alert you to errors and omissions
contained in the Pima County and Cochise County certifications of the 2014 General Election.
I have enclosed a copy of my correspondence to the Pima County Board of Supervisors, dated
November 18, 2014 (enclosing the declarations of 132 registered voters); to the Cochise CountyBoard of Supervisors, dated November 19, 2014 (enclosing the declarations of 9 registered
voters and highlighting 11 early ballots from voters who failed to sign their ballots and were not
given an equal opportunity to cure that error as other voters); and to the Pima County Board ofSupervisors, dated November 20, 2014 (enclosing an additional 15 declarations from registered
voters whose votes were not counted in accordance with state and federal law).
In each of these submissions, we identified a variety of errors. There is no dispute that these
voters were properly registered to vote and were fully qualified to do so as Arizona citizens, yet
their ballots remain uncounted.
As Im sure you are aware, the deadline under A.R.S. 16-142(a) for county certification is
Monday, November 24. At the Board of Supervisor meetings for Pima and Cochise County, weasked the Boards to delay the canvass and certification of the election to allow the respective
Recorders in each county to review and resolve these discrepancies. In fact, at least in Pima
County, the Board scheduled the county certification six days earlierthan the certificationoccurred in 2012, when the margin was not nearly as razor thin as the margin in this election.
Both counties refused to consider or even address these issues, notwithstanding the sworn
declarations before them demonstrating innumerable instances of clear poll worker error.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
2/199
The Honorable Ken Bennett
November 21, 2014
Page 2
04031-0078/LEGAL124271471.2
We understand that Pima County Recorder F. Ann Rodriguez is now -- after the fact --
conducting an examination or audit of these issues although we have not been provided a copy of
her report or conclusions. We have only yesterday received an updated list of rejectedprovisional and conditional ballots and this morning a list of problem early ballots. We continue
to investigate these issues and would be happy to provide additional updated information as soon
as we are able but in the meantime we did not want to delay the transmission of this material toyour attention.
We would respectfully submit that, as Arizonas Chief Elections Officer with ultimateresponsibility for the conduct, and certification, of this election, that you take steps to review
these declarations and either direct the county boards to investigate, count these ballots, and
amend their certification, or, alternatively, to conduct that investigation yourself as part of the
state canvassing and certification process.
I would be happy to discuss at your convenience if you would like.
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
Kevin J. Hamilton
KJH:cb
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
3/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
4/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
5/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
6/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
7/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
8/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
9/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
10/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
11/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
12/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
13/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
14/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
15/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
16/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
17/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
18/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
19/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
20/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
21/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
22/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
23/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
24/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
25/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
26/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
27/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
28/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
29/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
30/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
31/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
32/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
33/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
34/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
35/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
36/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
37/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
38/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
39/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
40/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
41/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
42/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
43/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
44/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
45/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
46/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
47/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
48/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
49/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
50/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
51/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
52/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
53/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
54/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
55/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
56/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
57/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
58/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
59/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
60/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
61/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
62/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
63/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
64/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
65/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
66/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
67/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
68/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
69/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
70/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
71/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
72/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
73/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
74/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
75/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
76/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
77/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
78/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
79/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
80/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
81/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
82/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
83/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
84/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
85/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
86/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
87/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
88/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
89/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
90/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
91/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
92/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
93/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
94/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
95/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
96/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
97/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
98/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
99/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
100/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
101/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
102/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
103/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
104/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
105/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
106/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
107/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
108/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
109/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
110/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
111/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
112/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
113/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
114/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
115/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
116/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
117/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
118/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
119/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
120/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
121/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
122/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
123/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
124/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
125/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
126/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
127/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
128/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
129/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
130/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
131/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
132/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
133/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
134/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
135/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
136/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
137/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
138/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
139/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
140/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
141/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
142/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
143/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
144/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
145/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
146/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
147/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
148/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
149/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
150/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
151/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
152/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
153/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
154/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
155/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
156/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
157/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
158/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
159/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
160/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
161/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
162/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
163/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
164/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
165/199
Kevin J. Hamilton
D. (206)359-8741
F. (206)359-9741
November 19, 2014
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Patrick Call, ChairmanAnn English, Vice-Chairman
Richard Searle, Supervisor
Cochise County Board of Supervisors
Re: Rejected Ballots
Dear Members of the Cochise County Board of Supervisors:
We write on behalf of the Ron Barber for Congress campaign to request that you (theBoard) count the ballots of the voters identified in this letter and the enclosed declarations and
include the votes reflected on those ballots in the Cochise County certification of the 2014General Election. As you will see from the enclosed declarations, eight of the declarants are
registered voters who cast provisional ballots in Cochise County in the 2014 General Election.
The other declarant cast an early ballot in Cochise County in the 2014 General Election.
Notwithstanding that these voters are registered and attempted to vote, their votes remainuncounted. In addition, Cochise County has informed the Ron Barber for Congress campaign
that eleven early ballots were rejected because they were not signed. The voters who submitted
those ballots should be permitted to cure them and have their votes counted.
As Im sure you know, A.R.S. 16-646 requires you to mail to the Secretary of State a
certified permanent copy of the official canvass of the General Election results, which will bemaintained and preserved as a permanent public record. With all due respect, the certified
copy of the canvass will not be true, accurate, and complete unless you count the ballots of the
voters who have submitted the enclosed declarations. And no certification should be made untilthe voters who submitted unsigned early ballots have been given an opportunity to cure their
ballots.
It is especially important to count every vote this year. The election for United States
House of Representatives in Arizonas second congressional district was extraordinarily close,
with the initial returns indicating that Martha McSally leads Ron Barber by a razor-thin marginof 161 votesless than one-tenth of one percent of the votes cast in the election. As a result, if
the Board certifies the canvass without counting the ballots of all of the declarants, the Board
will have increased the possibility that the election for Arizonas second congressional districtwill be improperly certified for the wrong candidate. Instead, the Board should count the ballots
of the declarants and delay certification of the canvass until the voters who submitted unsigned
early ballots have been given an opportunity to cure their ballots.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
166/199
Letter to Cochise County Board of Supervisors
November 19, 2014
Page 2
LEGAL ARGUMENT
A. Out-of-Precinct Ballots
The votes of at least eight registered voters who cast ballots in Cochise County wererejected because they were not cast in the voters assigned precincts. Those ballots should be
counted.
InNortheast Ohio Coalition for Homeless v. Husted, 696 F.3d 580 (6th Cir. 2012)
(NEOCH) (per curiam), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which foundthat the plaintiffs had shown a likely equal protection violation, upheld the portion of a
preliminary injunction requiring Ohio to count ballots cast in the wrong precinct due to the
failure of poll workers to comply with their statutory duty to direct voters to the correct precinct.Id. at 584, 588, 593, 597. Similarly here, all eight declarants indicate on their declarations thatthey were notinformed that they had voted in the incorrect polling place and that poll workers
made no effort to direct them to the correct polling place. See Decl. of Linda Barnett 3; Decl.
of Walterio Gonzalez 3; Decl. of George Locket 3; Decl. of Irma Quintero 3; Decl. ofSusan Amber Ruiz 3; Decl. of Catherine Schultejann 3; Decl. of Janice L. Wilson 3; Decl.
of Susan B. Wingler 3. Given that that the issue with these ballots could easily have been
avoided if poll workers had simply told the declarants that their votes would not count anddirected them to their assigned polling location, the Board should follow the reasoning of
NEOCH, find that the disenfranchisement of these voters would constitute an undue burden on
the right to vote, and count all of the ballots at issue.
The out-of-precinct ballots should also be counted under the Help America Vote Act
(HAVA). In relevant part, that law states that [i]f the appropriate State or local electionofficial to whom the [provisional] ballot or voter information is transmitted . . . determines that
the individual is eligibleunder State law to vote, the individuals provisional ballot shall be
countedas a vote in that election in accordance with State law. 52 U.S.C. 21082(a)(4)(emphases added). Because all of the out-of-precinct ballots at issue were cast by voters who are
registered to vote, e.g., Ruiz Decl. 3, the plain language of 52 U.S.C. 21082(a)(4) indicates
that these votes shall be counted.
B. Signature Mismatches
In addition, the early ballot of Guillermo Gamez was improperly rejected based on a
determination that his signature on the affidavit on his early ballot envelope did not match thesignature on file in the Recorders Office. See Decl. of Guillermo Gamez 2. He has called the
hotline established by the Cochise County Recorders Office for resolving discrepancies of this
nature, and he is willing to provide whatever personal information is necessary to verify that he
is the person who submitted his early ballot. Id. 3-4. For at least three reasons, his ballot
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
167/199
Letter to Cochise County Board of Supervisors
November 19, 2014
Page 3
should be counted (or he should be permitted to provide any additional information needed in
order for the ballot to be counted).
First, where there has been a determination of a signature mismatch, the Secretary of
States Election Procedures Manual (2014) (Manual)which has the force and effect oflaw, Gonzalez v. Arizona, 677 F.3d 383, 397 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing A.R.S. 16-452), affd sub
nom. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2247 (2013)requires that the
voter be allowed to explain that he or she did vote the ballot and . . . why the signatures do not
match. Manual at 167. Because no deadline has been set by Arizona law for the submission ofsuch an explanation, the Board should find that Gamezs declaration constitutes an explanation
that requires his ballot to be counted.
Second, Gamezs ballot should be counted pursuant to Article 2, Section 21, of theArizona Constitution, which provides that all elections shall be free and equal and guaranteesthat no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the
right of suffrage. There does not appear to be any suggestion that Gamez is not properly
registered to vote or that he failed to comply with the states requirements for submission of
early ballots. Gamez, in other words, took every step he was required to take for his early ballotto be counted. Refusing to count his ballots under these circumstances would constitute an
interference with the free exercise of the right of suffrage and violate the constitutional guarantee
of elections that are free and equal.
Third, Gamezs ballot should be counted because a failure to do so would constitute an
undue burden on his right to vote in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the FourteenthAmendment to the United States Constitution. In determining whether a challenged electoral
practice unduly burdens the right to vote, a court would weigh the character and magnitude of
the asserted injury to the rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments that theplaintiff seeks to vindicate against the precise interests put forward by the State as justifications
for the burden imposed by its rule, taking into consideration the extent to which those interests
make it necessary to burden the plaintiffs rights. Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 434 (1992)(quotation omitted). The Supreme Court has explained that, [h]owever slight th[e] burden may
appear, . . . it must be justified by relevant and legitimate state interests sufficiently weighty to
justify the limitation. Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181, 191 (2008)(Stevens, J., controlling opinion) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Here, the Board will severely burden Gamezs right to voteby disenfranchising himifit does not count his ballot. On the other side of the ledger, there is at best a nominal
administrative benefitthe Board will need to take no further actionin disenfranchising him.
Plainly, that state interest (if it can be properly termed a legitimate state interest at all) isoutweighed by the interest in counting his lawfully cast ballot. The Equal Protection Clause
therefore requires that his ballot be counted.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
168/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
169/199
Letter to Cochise County Board of Supervisors
November 19, 2014
Page 5
CC: Michael J. Ortega
Cochise County Administrator
Edward Rheinheimer
Cochise County Attorney
Eric H. Spencer
Snell & Wilmer
Counsel to Martha McSally
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
170/199
APPENDIX
First Name Last Name Address
City, State Zip
Reason forRejection
Summary of Declaration
Linda Barnett 115 A St.Bisbee, AZ 85603
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Guillermo Gamez 1580 Estrella Avenue,Apt. A
Douglas, AZ 85607
ProblemEarly Ballot
Voter was informed that thesignature on her early ballot did nmatch the signature on file.
Walterio Gonzalez 843 E 7th St.
Douglas, AZ 85607
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter w
not informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Irma Hernandez DeQuintero
5017 E Cielo Cir.
Sierra Vista, AZ 85635
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
George Lockett 2031 E Cristina Ave.
Sierra Vista, AZ 85635
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter w
not informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Susan Ruiz 150 W Flint St.
Benson, AZ 85602
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Catherine Schultejann 5176 S Happy Trl.
Sierra Vista, AZ 85650
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Janice Wilson 5342 S. Santa Elena Ave.
Sierra Vista, AZ 85650
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
171/199
- 2 -
First Name Last Name Address
City, State Zip
Reason forRejection
Summary of Declaration
Susan Wingler 2679 Far Horizon Way
Sierra Vista, AZ 85635
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was the
incorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
172/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
173/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
174/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
175/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
176/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
177/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
178/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
179/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
180/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
181/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
182/199
Letter to Pima County Board of Supervisors
November 20, 2014
Page 2
CC: Chuck Huckelberry
Pima County Administrator
Barbara LaWall
Pima County Attorney
Eric H. Spencer
Snell & WilmerCounsel to Martha McSally
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
183/199
APPENDIX
First Name Last Name Address
City, State Zip
Reason forRejection
Summary of Declaration
Melissa Armendariz 5317 N. Flint StreetTucson, AZ 85704
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. No effwas made to direct the voter to thproper location.
Kay Bigglestone 3114 E. 4th Street Apt 142
Tucson, AZ 85716
Wrong PollLocation
Voter recently moved. On electiday the voter showed up at thewrong precinct and therefore wasrequired to vote provisionally.Voter was not informed that it wathe incorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Emily Cooper 1629 N. Columbus Lane
Tucson, AZ 85712
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Jessica Diaz 3234 E. Bellevue StreetUnit 3103
Tucson, AZ 85716
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location
Devin Gardner 8850 N. Mesquite BluffsPlace
Tucson, AZ 85742
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Ryan Garn 1526 E. 9th Street
Tucson, AZ 85719
ProblemEarly Ballot
Voter was informed that thesignature on his early ballot did nmatch the signature on file
Rene Gonzalez 1901 E. Glenn Street, Unit103
Tucson, AZ 85719
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter w
not informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Tyler Hansen 7751 N. John Paul JonesAvenue
Tucson, AZ 85741
Ballot NotSigned
Poll worker directed him where tsign; however, provisional ballotdisqualified for lack of signature
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
184/199
- 2 -
First Name Last Name Address
City, State Zip
Reason forRejection
Summary of Declaration
Cameron McAllister 518 E. Roger Road
Tucson, AZ 85705
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was the
incorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
RichardMichael
Ross 163 N. CheesebrushAvenue
Tucson, AZ 85748
Wrong PollLocation
Voter recently moved and updatehis registration information withthe MVD. On election day thevoter showed up at the wrongprecinct and therefore was requirto vote provisionally. Voter wasnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the vote
to the proper location.Justin Sarantides 2855 E Presidio Rd
Tucson, AZ 85716
Other Reason Voted provisionally due to showup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Alison Shores 5050 E. Riverhouse RoadUnit G
Tucson, AZ 85718
Wrong PollLocation
Voter recently moved and updatehis registration information withthe MVD. On election day thevoter showed up at the wrongprecinct and therefore was requir
to vote provisionally. Voter wasnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Susan Stillman 1119 E. 12th Street
Tucson, AZ 85719
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due toinconsistent address.
Victor Vasquez 5740 N. Escondino Lane
Tucson,AZ 85704
Wrong PollLocation
Voted provisionally due to showiup at the wrong precinct. Voter wnot informed that it was theincorrect polling place and no
effort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
Sandra Vickey 4119 N. Nidito Place
Tucson, AZ 85705
Wrong PollLocation
Voter recently moved. On electiday the voter showed up at thewrong precinct and therefore wasrequired to vote provisionally.Voter was not informed that it wathe incorrect polling place and noeffort was made to direct the voteto the proper location.
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
185/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
186/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
187/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
188/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
189/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
190/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
191/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
192/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
193/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
194/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
195/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
196/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
197/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
198/199
-
8/10/2019 Barber letter to secretary of state
199/199