basic assessment report cabriere estate, erf 217, … · cabriere estate, erf 217, rawsonville ref:...

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CABRIERE ESTATE, ERF 217, RAWSONVILLE

REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

1

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the

National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended,

and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations

The proposed rezoning, subdivision and construction of services infrastructure & housing estate for a proposed portion of Cabriere Erf 217, Rawsonville

Viva Construction (Rawsonville) (Pty) Ltd

September 2007


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

2

Table of Contents

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................. 3

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. ACTIVITY NEED AND DESIRABILITY....................................................................................................................... 7 3. ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 4. ACTIVITY LOCATION .............................................................................................................................................. 11 5. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY........................................................................................................................ 12 6. SITE ACCESS .......................................................................................................................................................... 12 7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS............................................................................................................................................. 13 8. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES ........................................................................... 13

SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 14

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE ........................................................................................................................................ 14 2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................................................... 14 3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE................................................................ 14 4. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................................................. 15 5. VEGETATION / GROUNDCOVER ........................................................................................................................... 15 6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA ........................................................................................... 17 7. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT ......................................................................................................................... 18 8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................... 19 9. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES .................................................................................................................... 21

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................................................ 24 SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................... 26

1. WASTE, EFFLUENT AND EMISSION MANAGEMENT........................................................................................... 26 2. WATER USE ............................................................................................................................................................ 28 3. POWER SUPPLY ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY ............................................................................................................................................ 29 5. NOISE IMPACTS ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 6. VISUAL IMPACTS .................................................................................................................................................... 30 7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACTIVITY… .................................................................................... 30 8. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE ..................... 32 9. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE .................................................................... 37 10. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE ................................... 44 11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS .......................................................................................................................................... 45 12. IMPACT SUMMARY OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE .......................................................................................... 45 13. RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER ................................................... 46

DECLARATIONS ................................................................................................................................................................... 48

List of Appendices

Appendix A: Locality Maps

Appendix B: Site Layout Plans and Architectural Guideline

Appendix C: Owners Consent Form

Appendix D: Site photographs

Appendix E: Public participation process

Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters

Appendix G: Specialist Reports

Appendix H: Engineering Reports

Appendix I: Worcester & Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality SDF and Geological Maps

Appendix J: Socio-Economic Data (Census 2001)


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

3

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION

(a) Is the project a new development or an upgrade of an existing development? YES �� NO

(b) Clearly describe the activity and associated infrastructure for which you are applying.

The proposed Portion A of Erf 217, Rawsonville, hereafter referred to as the “Subject Land”, is situated adjacent to the existing residential area of Rawsonville, in the Breede Valley Municipality. The Subject Land is located approximately 700m east of the Central Business District (CBD) within the urban edge of Rawsonville. See Appendix A: Locality Maps. Viva Developments (Rawsonville) (Pty) Ltd, hereafter referred to as ‘the Developer”, has a contract to purchase the Subject Land from Mr Willem Johannes Smith, hereafter referred to as the “Owner”. The contract is subject to the approval of the environmental authorisation and a rezoning application. The Subject Land is currently zoned for agricultural use and is currently cultivated with wine vineyard. There are no built structures located on the Subject Land. The Developer is therefore proposing the following:

• The subdivision of Erf 217 Rawsonville (Worcester), presently 9.1820ha in extent, to a Remainder (4.9634ha) and Portion A (4.2186ha) (or the Subject Land).

• The rezoning of Portion A from Agricultural Zone I to Subdivisional Area, in order to accommodate the following uses which would constitute the proposed Cabriere Estate Residential Development (“the Development”):

o 95 townhouse erven (one unit per erf) zoned Residential Zone III (totalling an area of 30801.23 m2),

o Open Space (3 erven totalling an area of 853.820 m2),

o Associated service infrastructure, o Associated access and internal roads (totalling an area of 10531.137m

2).

(Appendix B: Site layout plans – Preferred Layout). The Developer intends constructing a perimeter palisade wall with a single entrance and gatehouse. It is expected that the construction of housing will take place within a year from the date of authorisation. The development, for the purposes of this application, consists of earthworks to prepare the land i.e. removal of vineyards, grading, trenching and compacting, the construction of an internal road network, and the installation of electric, water, storm water and sewer systems.

Specific listed activities applied for: Listed Activity 1(k): The construction of infrastructure, including associated structures or infrastructure for the bulk transportation of sewage and water, including storm water, in pipelines an internal diameter of 0,36 metres or more; or a peak throughput of 120 litres per second or more (GN R 386, April 2006). According to the Bulk Services Report compiled on behalf of the development and for the Breede Valley Municipality by Community Engineering Services (CES), the planned sewer reticulation will utilise pipes with a diameter of between 0.110 m to 0.160 m, which is less than the 0.36 m stipulated in the Regulations (GN 386 of 2006). The project’s engineers however plan to install underground storm water pipes with a diameter varying from 0.375 m to 0.450 m (R. Taljaard, pers. comm, V&V Engineering). Listed Activity 15: The construction of a road that is wider than 4 metres or that has a reserve wider than 6 metres, excluding roads that fall within the ambit of another listed activity or which are access roads of less than 30 metres long (GN R 386, April 2006). The Developer intends constructing roads with a minimum width of 5.5 m, accommodated within a road reserve of 13 m (Appendix H: V&V Engineering Report, 2006). Listed Activity 16: The transformation of undeveloped, vacant or derelict land to - (b) residential, mixed, retail, commercial, industrial or institutional use where such development does not constitute infill and where the total area to be transformed is bigger than 1 hectare; (GN R 386, April 2006).


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

4

The proposed development will establish a residential use covering an area of 4.2186 ha (BolandPlan, Motivation Report for Rezoning, 2006). Listed Activity 18: The subdivision of portions of land 9 hectares or larger into portions of 5 hectares or less (GN R 386, April 2006). The Developer is applying for the subdivision of the Erf 217 Rawsonville (Worcester) with an area of 9.1820 ha for town-house development (BolandPlan Motivational Report for Rezoning, 2006). References: BolandPlan, July 2006. Voorgestelde aansoek om hersonering en onderverdeling: Cabriere Erf 217, Rawsonville Viva Developments (Pty) Ltd. Community Engineering Services (CES) Report, May 2007. Development of Erf 217, Rawsonville, Bulk Water and Sewer Services. Streicher J.J.

(c) Please provide details of all components of the proposed project and attach diagrams (e.g. architectural drawings or perspectives, engineering drawings, process flow charts etc.).

Buildings YES �� NO

Provide brief description:

The Developer intends constructing 95 townhouses, a palisade perimeter wall along Botha Street and the remainder of Erf 217 (Appendix B: Site Layout Plans). A Homeowners Association will be established and will be responsible for enforcing the Architectural Guidelines during the Operational Phase.

Infrastructure (e.g. roads, power and water supply/ storage) YES �� NO


Proposed infrastructure: Internal Roads: Internal roads have been designed with a minimum width of 5.5 m, accommodated within a road reserve of 13 m. The internal roads will be paved with cement paving stones (L. Verwoerd, pers.comm., BolandPlan). Electricity Supply: Eskom will be able to provide electricity to the proposed residential development from the Rawsonville 66/11kV substation. It is expected to connect the erven to the underground system at the existing mini-sub RAWMA2 (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters). Accommodation of the development in the existing system will require augmentation and this will attract network extension and the related cost to the Developer (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Letter regarding assurance of municipal services). Street Lighting: Appropriate, downward facing street lighting will be provided at suitable intervals in all streets, at intersections and in all public open spaces within the development (Appendix B: Architectural Guideline, June 2007). Water Reticulation and Bulk System: Master planning indicated that this development area should be accommodated in the existing Rawsonville zone (CES, 2007). The connection to the existing system should be done on the new 160mm diameter pipe in Botha Street (Refer Figure 1 in Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The original water analysis for the master plan was done with a total annual daily demand (AADD) for the development as calculated by Community Engineering Services (CES):


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

5

95 Residential Erven @ 0.7 kl / day / unit Total = 66.5 kl / day (Appendix H: Engineering Reports CES Report 2007).

Fire flow criteria = 15 l / s @ 7m (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007).

Accommodation of the development in the present system will require upgrading of the existing system. The CES Report further states that the incremental water cost of the proposed development on the relevant master plan items is in the region of R 830 760.00 (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department states in their letter of 11 June 2007, that the current water distribution system has “insufficient capacity at Rawsonville to accommodate the proposed development. Additional raw water sources are required due to the influence of the proposed development together with other future development areas in the existing system”. The letter concludes that “The Developer of the proposed Development will be liable for Bulk Service Levies (as calculated by the Breede Valley Municipality) as a contribution towards water, sewerage and network extension and contribution costs for the embankment protection of the Smalblaar River” (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal services letter). Subsequent to the municipality’s letter the Developer met with the Landowner and has signed an agreement to purchase agricultural water to secure sufficient water supply for the development (Appendix F: Purchase agreement regarding water resources and supply). The Developer provides a programme that “shows that demands on the bulk water systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale.” (Appendix F – Water demand timeframe). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning water supply be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development. Sewer Network: The Development falls within the existing Rawsonville Drainage Area and within the sewer priority area. The sewer flow was calculated for the Master Plan with a Peak Day Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) of 43.0 kl / day. Re-analysis produced a value of 46.5 kl / day (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The CES report finds that there “is sufficient capacity in the sewer reticulation system to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore it finds that “no adjustments to the proposed master plan items of June 2006 are required to accommodate the measured flow from the development, except for Item 1 required to connect to the existing system” (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The CES report estimates the incremental cost of the proposed development on the relevant master plan items to be in the region of R 133 000. (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department state in their letter of 11 June 2007, that “the existing Rawsonville Waste Water Treatment Works (RwTW), has reached its full capacity in terms of COD loading” and is in need of upgrading. The municipality’s letter furthermore states that “there is insufficient capacity in the existing Rawsonville RwTW to accommodate the proposed Development” and that the present RwTW will require “augmentation” due to this and other future developments (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal Services letter, 2007). The engineers provide a programme that “shows that demands on the sewer systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale. By this time the upgrading of the sewer works will allow additional flows” (Appendix F). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning sewerage be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development. Internal Storm Water System: V&V Engineers recommend a piped storm water system designed to cater for the 2-year recurrence flood, with larger runoffs catered for above-ground, along the paved roads (Appendix H: V&V Engineering, May 2007).


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

6

External Storm Water System: All storm water will be channelled towards the south-eastern corner of the site from where it will be taken in an open lined canal across the Remainder of Erf 217 in a south-easterly direction, to the Smalblaar River (Appendix H: V&V Engineering, May 2007). References: Community Engineering Services (CES) Report, May 2007. Development of Erf 217, Rawsonville, Bulk Water and Sewer Services. Streicher J.J. V&V Engineers Pty (Ltd), May 2007, Erf 217, Rawsonville, Residensiële Ontwikkeling Diensteverslag. Breede Valley Municipality, June 2007. Rawsonville Erf 217, Municipal Infrastructure: Environmental Authorisation: Visser, W.

Processing activities (e.g. manufacturing, storage, distribution) YES NO ��


Not applicable.

Storage facilities for raw materials and products (e.g. volume and substances to be stored)

Provide brief description YES NO ��

Not applicable.

Storage and treatment facilities for solid waste and effluent generated by the project YES NO ��

Provide brief description

Municipal household solid waste will be stored at each household and removed once a week as per the usual municipal collection and dumping of solid domestic waste.

Other activities (e.g. water abstraction activities, crop planting activities) YES NO ��

Provide brief description

Not applicable.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

7

2. ACTIVITY NEED AND DESIRABILITY (a) Describe the need and desirability of the activity:

The following aspects are linked to the need of the proposed development:

• Provision of scarce new residential opportunities in Rawsonville. The scarcity of land suitable for accommodating the current and future growth needs in Rawsonville has been identified as a major constraint in the Breede Valley IDP (2002-2007). The scarcity of suitable land is the result of mountainous terrain, the broad floodplain of the Breede river, and the presence of agriculturally valuable and productive land beyond the urban edge. In this regard, the Subject Land parcel is one of the few remaining undeveloped land parcels within the Rawsonville urban edge. A local councillor has indicated that a specific need currently exists for affordable middle-income housing for members of both the Coloured and White population groups (Goedeman – pers. comm). Another local councillor has indicated that Rawsonville is becoming a favoured retirement location for people from outside the area (Du Toit – pers. comm). An independent estate agent dealing with property in the area has further indicated that a huge demand currently exists for residential opportunities available to first-time buyers, retirees and investors in Rawsonville. She emphasized that the specific demand is for affordable properties in the R500 000 – R800 000 range (Bekker, Aiida Worcester – pers. comm). In this regard, the proposed development is for 95 medium-density townhouses, specifically pitched at affordability.

• Provision of impetus to local employment creation. Employment creation has been identified as an urgent priority for the Breede Valley in the revised 2006/ 2007 IDP document. Growth of the construction and tourism sectors has been explicitly identified as a viable strategy. In this regard, the proposed development would yield up to 150 employment opportunities during the 9 month (or more) construction phase. In view of a well-established construction sector in the Worcester area, it may be assumed that local contractors and building suppliers from within the Breede Valley area will be utilized. An additional number of direct employment opportunities associated with provision of gardening, security and housekeeping services, will be created for the operational phase. The envisaged construction of units, in part pitched at the retirement market would arguably attract an inflow of new residents and associated capital into the area.

• Provision of intra-annually stable employment opportunities. Current unskilled and semi-skilled employment opportunities in the Rawsonville area are mainly associated with the agricultural sector. A large number of these opportunities are seasonal in nature, resulting in high rates of seasonal unemployment. This situation has been severely aggravated by the passing of ESTA (Extension of Security of Tenure Act 1997) which resulted in many farm labourers and their families losing tenure on farms and having to move to the nearest town. They thus constitute a large pool of unskilled seasonally unemployed people in rural Boland towns such as Rawsonville. According to the SAPS station commander in Rawsonville, there appears to be a direct link between seasonal unemployment and increased incidence of property crime in the community. In his opinion, more stable employment creation would greatly reduce the incidence of crime in general (May – pers. comm). In this regard, employment opportunities associated with the operational phase of the proposed development (e.g. gardening, security, housekeeping) are not seasonally determined, and can therefore make a significant contribution to the community as a whole. In addition, the economic multiplier effects of a potential increase of 95 middle-income households in Rawsonville may be expected to benefit various local retail and service providers, and thus provide a stimulus to employment creation. This is in line with one of the development goals stated in the Breede Valley 2006/ 2007 IDP, viz. to promote the development of second-tier retail and services centres outside of Worcester.

The following aspects are linked to the desirability of the proposed development:

• Falls within the Rawsonville urban edge. Very little land within the Rawsonville urban edge is available for residential development. At the same time, a large demand for residential property exists in Rawsonville. Meeting this demand is positively linked to the town’s social


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

8

vitality and economic growth. The proposed development falls within the demarcated urban edge of Rawsonville. Development of the Subject Land parcel would meet Rawsonville’s need for residential opportunities, and support the Western Cape Provincial SDF’s principles of infill and densification, as well as the Provincial Urban Edge Guidelines, which discourages edge encroachment on agriculturally productive land and onto steep slopes.

• Supported by relevant local planning documents. As was noted above, the Breede Valley IDP has identified the scarcity of land suitable for development and situated within the urban edge as a major constraint with regard to the development of Rawsonville. In this regard, the Subject Land parcel in question has been earmarked in the Breede Valley SDF for the purpose of accommodating high density residential development. The proposed development is for 23 units/ha, and thus well within the high-density limit of 50 units/ ha.

• Alternative land currently available for accommodating low cost housing. A local councillor has indicated that Council has recently (early December 2006) purchased sufficient land in order to meet current needs for RDP housing in Rawsonville, and that a small surfeit may even exist after the purchase (Goedeman – pers. comm).

• The proposed development will contribute to towards upgrading the municipal service delivery capacity. The developer will make a standard development contribution to the Breede Valley Local Municipality.

• The proposed development will not result in loss of agricultural jobs. After the sale of the Subject Land parcel in question, Cabriere farm will still dispose over more than 40 ha of vineyard, consisting of different land parcels including the Remainder of Erf 217.. The owner of Cabriere farm has indicated that the loss of 4.2 ha will not aversely affect current farming operations, and will not result in any shedding of employment opportunities (Smit – pers. comm).

• Development may benefit stability of Cabriere farming operations. The northern portion of the Subject Land parcel is currently planted with senescent vines, which would need to be replaced within 2 years. Costs associated with removal and replanting are significant. The owner of Cabriere farm has indicated that the capital income from selling the land parcel would enable him to offset the loss of the 4.2 ha by replanting 9 ha of other vines on Cabriere instead (Smit – pers. comm). This replanting is necessary in order to ensure stable production and employment provision.

• Unsuitability for accommodating emerging farmers. The land parcel in question is too small to accommodate emerging wine farmers. In the Rawsonville area a minimum of 30 ha is generally deemed the smallest viable economic viticulture unit (Smit – pers. comm). In that regard, the Subject Land parcel would yield only 14% of the required size. Furthermore, reestablishment of productive vines would be costly, and viable yields may only be expected after a few years. Similarly, the land parcel is too small for establishing viable orchards. Use of the land parcel for establishing emerging low value agricultural operations (e.g. vegetables) may be potentially viable. However, the opportunity costs involved in utilizing scarce residential land for low value agricultural production cannot be rationally justified.

References: Personal sources

• Smit, Mr. (Telephonic). Landowner.

• Bekker, Ms. (Telephonic). Aïda Worcester.

• Goedeman, Ward Clr. (Telephonic). Councillor for Rawsonville.

• Du Toit, Ward Clr. (Telephonic). Councillor for Rawsonville.

• May, (Telephonic). SAPS Rawsonville. Printed sources Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework, 2003. MacroPlan.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

9

Community Engineering Services (CES) Report, May 2007. Development of Erf 217, Rawsonville, Bulk Water and Sewer Services. Streicher J.J. Ellis, F (2006). Report on a soil survey and agricultural suitability investigation of the property known as Erf 217, Rawsonville. IDP 2006 /2007 Review Breede Valley Municipality, May 2006. Breede Valley Municipality (WC025) 2006 / 2007 IDP Review. Van Rooyen, M.E. Guide Plan for Worcester and Environs, 1990. Department of Planning and Provincial Affairs. Internet sources

• www.capegaetway.gov.za (Municipal profile).

• www.demarcation.org.za (Census 2001 data).

(b) Indicate the benefits that the activity will have for society in general and also indicate the benefits that the activity will

have for the local communities where the activity will be located:

i). Benefits for society in general are associated with the following:

• No specific benefits for society in general are associated with the proposed development. ii). Benefits for the larger community are associated with the following:

• Contribution towards municipal service provision capacity: The Developer will make a financial contribution of between R10 000 to R16 000 per erf (x 95 erven = R950 000 to R1.5 million) towards the implementation of Water and Sewerage Master Plans in the relevant area.

• Employment opportunities during the construction phase. While the appointment of contractors for the development of services infrastructure, etc. is contingent on approval, indications at this stage are that contractors in the Worcester area will be appointed. Furthermore, a significant number of skilled construction labourers exist in Worcester and would therefore, in most likelihood, be employed during the construction phase. Within the building trade, a figure of 30% of total cost is generally accepted as a reasonable fraction for labour expenses. A subsequent R15 – R18 million (at current value) would therefore accrue to local communities in terms of labour. Given the relatively small scale and short duration of the project, skills training (i.e. of new labourers) would however not be economically viable.

• Stimulus to local building supplies manufacturing industry: A large number of building supplies manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers are located in Worcester. In as far as transportation costs are a significant factor in construction, it is assumed that building materials and supplies will be obtained from local suppliers.

• Contribution to rates and taxes base: The 95 residential units would contribute to the local rates and taxes base. Each completed unit is expected to contribute between R 3 000 and R 4 000 annually at current value. The resulting yield would entail an amount of between R 282 000 and R 376 000.

• Operational phase employment: During the operational phase, a number of employment opportunities (e.g. security, gardening, maintenance and domestic work) will be created. These associated employment opportunities will provide important stable employment year round in a community which currently suffers from significant seasonal unemployment/ underemployment.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

10

3. ALTERNATIVES Describe alternatives that are considered in this application. Please Note: 1. This report only provides space for 3 alternatives. The required information must however be provided for all alternatives being

considered. Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity could be accomplished. The determination of whether the site or activity (including different processes etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. The no-go option must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of all alternatives are assessed.

2. After receipt of this report the competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent.

3. Consult the Department’s Guideline on Alternatives prior to completing this section.

3(a) Site alternatives: Please indicate the number of site alternatives assessed: One site

Describe site alternative 1 (S1) (preferred or only site alternative), for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

The proposed Portion A of the Erf 217, Rawsonville is the preferred site for the development as it lies within the urban edge of Rawsonville, adjacent to an existing residential area. The site represents one of the last remaining unbuilt erven earmarked for township / residential landuse in Rawsonville (Appendix I: Worcester and Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework and Geological Maps). The preferred site is rated as medium to medium-high in terms of agricultural potential for both annual crops or perennial crops (Appendix G: Agricultural Potential Study). Support for subdivision was given by the Department of Agriculture (W. Cape) Appendix F: Department of Agriculture, September 2006).

Describe site alternative 2 (S2), if any, for the activity described above, or for any other activity alternative:

An alternative site was not identified as the proposed Remainder of Erf 217 lies outside the urban edge and has better soil and agricultural potential.

3(b) Activity alternatives: Two (One plus the No-go Option)

Describe activity alternative 1 (A1), if any, for any or all of the site alternatives as appropriate:

The preferred option is to subdivide and rezone Erf 217 Rawsonville to a sub-divisional area for the establishment of 95 townhouse erven and related infrastructure (roads and municipal services). The Developer intends sub-contracting a building firm to construct the 95 townhouses (Appendix B: Site Layout Plans). The preferred Subject Land parcel is located within the urban edge of Rawsonville, and the rezoning proposal for residential use is not in conflict with the current Rawsonville Zoning Scheme Regulations, Rawsonville Spatial Analysis or the Breede Valley Municipality SDF. The Guide Plan for Worcester and Environs depicts the Subject Land parcel as “high potential agricultural land” (despite the Subject Land falling within the urban edge of Rawsonville) and the agricultural potential, in terms of the soil, determined as “medium to medium-high”. The project’s Town and Regional Planners have motivated to have the Guide Plan amended (Appendix I: Worcester and Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework and Geological Maps and BolandPlan, Aansoek om Wysiging van die Worcester en Omgewing Gidsplan 1991, Erf 217 Rawsonville, November 2006).

Describe activity alternative 2 (A2), if any, for any or all of the site alternatives as appropriate:


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

11

The No-go Option would result in the cancellation of the Option to Purchase and the Subject Land parcel would revert back to agricultural use.

3(c) Other alternatives (e.g. layout, technological, timing, process etc):

Describe the alternative

Preferred Layout Option The proposed residential development would be in accordance with the principles of urban infill and densification, as outlined in the Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework (Western Cape Provincial SDF, 2005). The proposed development consists of 95 townhouses with a resulting density of 23 dwelling units per hectare. The townhouse residential erven in this layout average +- 312 m

2 in extent and the range from 247m

2 to 402m

2. The preferred layout

allows for a 13m road reserve, as required by the Municipality’s Operational Services Department (Appendix B: Site Layout Plans and Architectural Guideline). The preferred layout caters for one entrance from Botha Street. The entrance to the development will be a four way intersection of Porter and Botha streets. A visual axis extends from Porter Street through the development to an Open Space and the existing vineyards on the eastern boundary of the development (Appendix B: Site Layout Plans and Architectural Guideline).

Alternative Layout Options: The alternative layout option consists of 95 townhouse erven. This layout yields a higher density of 26 dwelling units per hectare. The townhouse residential erven in this layout average +- 275m

2 in extent and the range from 224m

2 to 400m

2

(Appendix B: Site Layout Plans and Architectural Guideline). The internal road network in this layout is significantly narrower than in the preferred layout.

4. ACTIVITY LOCATION

Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates must be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The minutes should be given to at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection.

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

Alternative S1 (preferred or only site alternative) 33o

41’ 02.31“ 19o 19 ‘ 08.54“

Alternative S2 (if any) o ‘ “

o ‘ “

Alternative S3 (if any) o ‘ “

o ‘ “

or, for linear activities:

Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E):

Alternative S1 (preferred or only route alternative) Not applicable.

• Starting point of the activity o ‘ “

o ‘ “

• Middle point of the activity o ‘ “

o ‘ “

• End point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “

Alternative S2 (if any) Not applicable.

• Starting point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “

• Middle point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “


‘ “ o

‘ “

Alternative S3 (if any) Not applicable.

• Starting point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

12

• Middle point of the activity o

‘ “ o

‘ “


‘ “ o

‘ “

Please Note: For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide and addendum with co-ordinates taken every 100 meters along the route for each alternative.

5. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity as well as alternative activities and its associated infrastructure (footprints):

Alternative: Size of the activity:

Alternative A1 (Preferred Activity Option) 42 186 m2

Alternative A2 (Alternative Option) 42 186 m2

Alternative A3 (No-go Option) (Whole property) 91 820 m2

or, for linear activities:

Alternative: Length of the activity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m

Alternative A2 (if any) m

Alternative A3 (if any) m

Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints will occur):

Alternative: Size of the site/servitude:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m2

Alternative A2 (if any) m2


Associated Infrastructure: Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above associated infrastructure footprints will occur):

Alternative: Size of the site/servitude:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m2



6. SITE ACCESS

Is there an existing access road? YES NO ��

If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built? +-10 m

Describe the type of access road planned:

In the preferred option an access road will be built. The townhouses will gain access from Botha Street and Porter Street extension (Appendix B: Site Layout Plans and Architectural Guideline). The access roads are very short (+-10m) and are essentially entrances. They will be asphalted or paved to acceptable engineering standards. Please Note: indicate the position of the proposed access road on the site plan (See Section 7 below)


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

13

7. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Colour photographs of the site and its surroundings (taken of the site and from the site) with a description of each photograph. The vantage points from which the photographs were taken must be indicated on the site plan, or locality plan as applicable. If available, please also provide a recent aerial photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix D to this form. It should be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site. Date of photographs must be included. Please note that the above requirements must be duplicated for all alternative sites.

8. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES

Please list all legislation, policies and/or guidelines that have or will be considered in the preparation of this application.

LEGISLATION ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY TYPE

Permit/ license/ Authorisation/comment DATE

(if already obtained):

National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism

Considered legislation, this application

Regulations in terms of Chapter 5 of the National Environmental , GN R 385, R 386 and R 387 2006

Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism / DEA&DP Chief Directorate Environment and Land Management

Considered legislation, this application

National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999: Sections 34, 35 and 38

South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) / Heritage Western Cape

Consolidated Record of Decision / Authorisation (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses and Supporting Letters)

11 September 2006

Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act 70 of 1970

Department of Agriculture / Department of Agriculture -Western Cape

Support / Authorisation (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses and Supporting Letters)

15 September 2006

POLICY/ GUIDELINES ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY

Guideline on Public Participation (2006) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on Alternatives (2006) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline on the Interpretation of the Listed Activities (2006)

Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Provincial Urban Edge Guideline (2005) Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning

Guideline for Involving Heritage Specialists in EIA Processes (2005)


Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework (2005)


Breede Valley Spatial Development Framework (2003) Breede Valley Municipality

Worcester and Environs Guide Plan (1990) Breede Valley Municipality


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

14

SECTION B: DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT Site/Area Description For linear activities (pipelines etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be necessary to complete copies of this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section C and indicate the area which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section C Copy No. (e.g. A): 1/1

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the sites (tick the appropriate box) Alternative S1:

Flat Flatter than 1:10 �� (lower slopes 1 : 18)

1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

Alternative S2:

Flat Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

Alternative S3:

Flat Flatter than 1:10 1:10 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site (tick (“�“) the appropriate box(es). Alternative S1:

Ridgeline Plateau Side slope of hill/mountain

Closed valley

Open valley

��

Plain Undulating

plain/low hills Dune

Sea- front

Other

Alternative S2:


Closed valley

Open valley

Plain Undulating


Sea- front

Other

Alternative S3:


Closed valley

Open valley

Plain Undulating


Sea- front

Other

If other, please describe

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE Is the site(s) located on or near any of the following (tick (“�”) the appropriate boxes)?

Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep)

YES NO

�� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies)

YES NO


Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil

YES NO


Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water)

YES NO



REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

15

Soils with high clay content YES NO


Any other unstable soil or geological feature

YES NO


An area sensitive to erosion

YES NO


If any of the answers to the above are “YES” or “unsure”, specialist input may be requested by the Department. (Information in respect of the above will often be available at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by Geological Survey may also be used).

4. SURFACE WATER Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites (tick (“�”) the appropriate boxes)?

Alternative S1 Alternative S2 Alternative S3

Perennial River YES

�� NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Non-Perennial River YES NO �� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Permanent Wetland YES NO �� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Seasonal Wetland YES NO �� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Artificial Wetland YES NO �� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO �� UNSURE YES NO UNSURE YES NO UNSURE

Rawsonville Flood Assessment The Breede Valley Municipality appointed the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Stellenbosch in 2004 to conduct a hydraulic model study of the flood flows at Rawsonville (Appendix G: Specialist Reports - Basson GR & Gazendam M, 2005. Rawsonville Flood and River Management Study – Final Report. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Stellenbosch). The following needs for the study were identified:

• uncertainty about the 1:100 year flood magnitude and flood levels;

• uncertainty about the safety of existing embankments along the river;

• need for extension of the town, especially at De Nova, possibly onto the floodplain between the Smalblaar and Holsloot rivers;

• uncertainty about the impacts of mechanical bulldozing of the boulders onto the river banks from year to year, and the mining of boulders upstream of the Smalblaar River bridge.

The study used a distorted scale model to simulate the effects of flooding of various magnitudes (1:10, 1:50 and 1:100 year flood events). The model test results showed that the town of Rawsonville (left bank) is affected at floods larger than 1:10 year, with flooding occurring upstream of the Smalblaar bridge and immediately downstream of the bridge to as far as the furthest sports field (Basson & Gazendam, Figure 8.6 Major flow patterns during a 1:100 year flood). The study identified a number of areas for flood embankment protection, including the neighbourhood on the left bank of the Smalblaar River, downstream of the bridge and adjacent to the furthest sports field downstream. This is upstream of the proposed Cabriere Estate development. In order to assess the potential threat to the proposed development by a major flood, the Developers appointed V&V Consulting Engineers to assess the Rawsonville Flood and River Management Report, plot the 1: 100 year flood line in relation to the proposed development and recommend mitigation to avert potential risks. The study concluded that Erf 217 would not be influenced by a 1:100 year flood and that no specific flood embankments need to be constructed (Appendix G: Specialist Reports – V&V Consulting Engineers, 2007).

5. VEGETATION / GROUNDCOVER


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

16

Tick (“�”) and describe (where required) the vegetation types / groundcover present on the site. Alternative S1:

Indigenous Vegetation - good condition

Indigenous Vegetation with scattered aliens

Indigenous Vegetation with heavy alien infestation

Identify the vegetation type above:



Provide ecosystem status for above:


Provide Ecosystem status for above:

Indigenous Vegetation in an ecological corridor or along a soil boundary /

interface

Veld dominated by alien species

Distinctive soil conditions (e.g. Sand over shale, quartz patches, limestone, alluvial deposits,

termitaria etc.) – describe

Bare soil

Building or other structure

Sport field

Paved surface

Cultivated land ��

Other (describe)

Alternative S2:











interface




Bare soil


Sport field

Paved surface

Cultivated land

Other (describe)

Alternative S3: Not applicable





Identify the vegetation type above: Identify the vegetation type above:





interface




Bare soil


Sport field

Paved surface

Cultivated land

Other (describe)

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the vegetation type / groundcover and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

17

To assist with the identification of the vegetation type and ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used.

6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA

Tick (“�”) the current land uses and/or prominent features that occur within +/- 500m radius of the site and neighbouring properties if these are located beyond 500m of the site. Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. Alternative S1:

Untransformed area �� Low density

residential ��

Medium density residential

��

High density

residential �� Informal residential

Retail Commercial & warehousing Light industrial �� Medium industrial Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting

room Military or police

base/station/compound Casino/entertainment

complex Tourism &

Hospitality facility

Open cast mine Underground mine Spoil heap or slimes dam Quarry, sand or borrow

pit Dam or reservoir

Hospital/medical center School Tertiary education facility Church Old age home

Sewage treatment plant Train station or shunting yard

Railway line Major road (4 lanes or

more) Airport

Harbour Sport facilities �� Golf course Polo fields Filling station

Landfill or waste treatment site Plantation Agriculture �� River, stream or

wetland ��

Nature conservation area

Mountain, koppie or ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard �� Archeological site

Other land uses (describe):

Alternative S2:

Untransformed area Low density residential

Medium density residential High density residential Informal residential

Retail Commercial & warehousing

Light industrial Medium industrial Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting

room Military or police


complex Tourism &

Hospitality facility






more) Airport

Harbour

Sport facilities Golf course Polo fields Filling station

Landfill or waste treatment site Plantation Agriculture River, stream or wetland Nature

conservation area

Mountain, koppie or ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard Archeological site


Alternative S3: Not Applicable

Untransformed area Low density residential Medium density residential High density residential Informal residential

Retail Commercial & warehousing

Light industrial Medium industrial Heavy industrial

Power station Office/consulting room Military or police


complex Tourism & Hospitality

facility


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

18






more) Airport

Harbour

Sport facilities Golf course Polo fields Filling station

Landfill or waste treatment site

Plantation Agriculture River, stream or wetland Nature conservation

area

Mountain, koppie or ridge Museum Historical building Graveyard Archeological site


7. REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT

Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing land use rights? Please explain

No, an application for rezoning from Agriculture Zone I use to a Subdivision Area, rezoning to Residential Zone III purposes and further subdivision is in process (BolandPlan, 2006).

Will the activity be in line with the following?

Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES �� NO Please explain

Worcester is identified in the Provincial SDF as having a High Composite Development Index and forms part of the strategic Breede River Corridor between Tulbagh and Swellendam. The current economic growth experienced in the region is resulting in an unprecedented demand for erven and houses (Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework, 2005).

Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES �� NO Please explain

The proposed Cabriere Estate Development lies approximately 0.7 km from the CBD of Rawsonville, within the defined urban edge. (Appendix I: Worcester and Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework and Geological Maps).

Integrated Development Plan of the Local Municipality YES �� NO Please explain

The current IDP Review document identifies job creation and access to housing as the two most critical areas of development. The proposed Cabriere Estate Development aims to contribute to both areas, while also improving the availability of services and increasing the municipality’s tax base (Breede Valley Municipality, IDP Review 2007 / /2007).

Spatial Development Framework of the Local Municipality YES �� NO Please explain

Erf 217 is identified and earmarked for high density residential development in the Breede Valley Municipality’s SDF (Appendix I: Worcester and Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework and Geological Maps).


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

19

8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT

Approved Guide Plan of the Municipality YES �� NO Please explain

The Guide Plan for Worcester and Environs depicts the Subject Land parcel as “high potential agricultural land”, despite the Subject Land falling within the urban edge of Rawsonville and the agricultural potential, in terms of the soil, determined as “medium to medium-high”. The project’s consulting town and regional planners have applied to have the Guide Plan amended (Appendix I: Worcester and Environs Guide Plan, Breede Valley Municipality Spatial Development Framework and Geological Maps and BolandPlan, Aansoek om Wysiging van die Worcester en Omgewing Gidsplan 1991, Erf 217 Rawsonville, November 2006).

Any other Plans YES NO �� Please explain


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

20

Describe the existing social and economic characteristics of the community in order to provide baseline information. Unless otherwise stated, all figures provided below are derived from the most recent (2001) Census data. It is assumed that trends – if not overall numbers – have remained reasonably constant. The Census only considered urban Rawsonville as a distinct (and undifferentiated) entity. No disaggregated figures for rural Rawsonville are available. Data has been subsumed within the much more comprehensive category of Worcester rural. It is assumed that statistical trends which were obtained for the entire rural Worcester also pertained to rural Rawsonville. Where possible, interviews with local Councillors and Breede Valley Local Municipality (BVLM) functionaries were used to interpret and update the Census data. BVLM figures are based on ward areas. Wards 19 and 20 are of relevance here, and include the Census categories of urban Rawsonville and a portion of Worcester rural, but do not exactly correspond to them. For this reason, focus will be on trends as opposed to absolute numbers in considering the BVLM figures. Urban Rawsonville represents the receiving community. According to Census data, the community was <55.5% Coloured and >43% White in 2001. Black Africans represented less than 1.5% of the population. The community was overwhelmingly Afrikaans speaking (97%). A large gender skew, with7% more females than males was recorded. This is substantially more pronounced than rates for rural Worcester (3%) and the BVLM (2%). Around 38% of the population was younger than 20, and around 10% was of retirement age (65+ years), resulting in a rate of just more than half the population of economically active age. With regard to education levels, of the population aged 20 and older, more than 28% had achieved a secondary certificate (<19.5% for the BVLM), and more than 5.5% a tertiary qualification (BVLM: <4.5%). At least 39% (but probably a higher rate) of the same population fraction have not passed grade 9, and may be considered functionally illiterate/ innumerate according to ABET criteria (50%+ for the BVLM). Compared to the June 2006 estimated national unemployment rate of 26.5%, the 2001 unemployment rate in urban Rawsonville was relatively low, at less than 9.5% (BVLM: >12.5%). Current figures obtained from the BVLM IDP office for wards 19 and 20 combined (which include urban and rural Rawsonville in addition to other rural areas), indicate an unemployment rate of 2.8% (Arendse – pers. comm.). Given the proportionally much smaller population within urban Rawsonville, it is assumed that unemployment there may be higher than this figure, and that for rural Rawsonville slightly lower. This low unemployment rate should however be seen within the context that many of the employment opportunities in the dominant agricultural sector are seasonal in nature. Interviews with local councillors have indicated that underemployment and seasonal unemployment are significant in the Rawsonville area (du Toit, Goedeman – pers. comm.). Seasonal unemployment is characteristic of rural communities in the Boland. The lack of income during part of the year (agricultural off-season) is associated with increased incidences of property crime. The SAPS station commander in Rawsonville has indicated that this correlation is apparent in Rawsonville (May – pers. comm). The portion of the urban Rawsonville population not economically active was relatively high (around 44%, compared with 36% for the BVLM), suggesting a relatively large retiree component. In terms of sectoral employment, the largest number of household heads (approximately 33.5%) were employed within the community, social and personal services sector (which includes government). Agriculture (>15.5%) and wholesale and retail trade (>15.5%) were other important sectors. The construction sector provided for >10% of jobs, and private households (gardening, domestic work) <8%. More than 6% of households had no formal source of income (BVLM: >9%), and a further 7.5% had a poverty-line datum income of R800 or less per month (BVLM: 34.5%). Around 80% of households had a monthly income of between R800 and R12800. In summary, the Rawsonville urban community can be described as more Coloured than White, Afrikaans speaking, with a significantly higher proportion of females over males. Education rates compared well with those for the municipal area, but a significant rate of functional illiteracy still prevailed. Unemployment levels are relatively low, and the economically non-active portion of the population relatively high. Income levels are clustered within the upper low to middle income brackets.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

21

The Worcester rural area (including rural Rawsonville) was predominantly Coloured (<75%), with a strong Black African component (<17%), compared to the historically relatively more dominant White population group (>8%). Afrikaans was by far the most dominant first language (<87.5%), with isiXhosa the second most dominant (<10%). A gender skew of around 3% more females than males occurred. The youth made up a significant component of the population, with around 43.5% under the age of 20. Only around 3% of the population was older than 65, suggesting that people past economically active age were encouraged to leave the farms on which they resided. Education levels were low. Of the population fraction 20 years or older, more than 60% had obtained less than complete primary schooling, and in excess of 70% of the population may be considered functionally illiterate/ innumerate. Only 8.5% had obtained a secondary qualification, and only around 2.5% had completed tertiary education. Unemployment rates were very low, less than 2.5% (BVLM: >12.5%), and around 79% of the population was recorded as economically active in real terms. The overwhelming majority of heads of households were employed in the agricultural sector (<84.5%), with wholesale and retail trade (<5.5%) and employment in private households (<4%) respectively the second and third most important sectors. Again, it may be assumed that a significant proportion of employment opportunities in the agricultural sector are seasonal in nature, thus this sector fails to provide a stable source of year-round income to all members of working age within a given household. While a small percentage (<1%) of households had no formal source of income, income rates were low. Of households with formal income, around 22% had an income of R800 or less per month. The vast majority of households were clustered in the lower income category, with around 85.5% having had an income of between R400 and R3200 per month. In summary, the rural community may be described as overwhelmingly Coloured and Afrikaans speaking, with slightly more females than males. The vast majority of household heads were employed in the agriculture sector. Education and income rates were low, and poverty rates were high. Interviews with local councillors have indicated that a substantial number of rural households may have moved to urban Rawsonville since the 2001 Census. As in other rural parts of the Western Cape, since the passing of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA) in 1997, a distinct trend has become apparent whereby farmers choose to relocate their workers and their families off their farms, and make use of urban labourers who are transported in on a daily basis. This generally has had negative consequences in terms of household income levels. Workers now have to pay for services which may have been provided for free on farms (housing, water, electricity, etc), and dependents of household heads have less access to casual employment opportunities or opportunities within the private household sector (domestic workers, gardeners, etc). Rural people generally also have either very low skills levels or very alternative have specialised skills only relevant to the rural setting. These two factors together make it difficult for them to find employment in urban settings.

9. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES Please be advised that if section 38 of the National Heritage Resources Act 25 of 1999 is applicable to your proposed development, then you are requested to furnish this Department with written comment from Heritage Western Cape as part of your public participation process. Section 38 of the Act states as follows: 38. (1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (7), (8) and (9), any person who intends to undertake a development categorised as- (a) the construction of a road, wall, power line, pipeline, canal or other similar form of linear development or barrier exceeding 300m in

length; (b) the construction of a bridge or similar structure exceeding 50m in length; (c) any development or other activity which will change the character of a site- (i) exceeding 5 000 m2 in extent; or (ii) involving three or more existing erven or subdivisions thereof; or (iii) involving three or more erven or divisions thereof which have been consolidated within the past five years; or (iv) the costs of which will exceed a sum set in terms of regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources

authority; (d) the re-zoning of a site exceeding 10 000 m2 in extent; or (e) any other category of development provided for in regulations by SAHRA or a provincial heritage resources authority, must at the very

earliest stages of initiating such a development, notify the responsible heritage resources authority and furnish it with details regarding the location, nature and extent of the proposed development.

Alternative S1:


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

22

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or in close proximity to the site?

YES �� NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain: Three small graveyards exist close to the Subject Land.

If uncertain, the Department may request that specialist input be provided to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site.

Briefly explain the findings of the specialist if one was already appointed:

The Heritage Archaeological specialist found “a possibly heavily pecked anvil and a tractor-damaged Early Stone Age flake”. The study concluded that the archaeological heritage remains are of “low local significance” and that the impact of the proposed development on archaeological heritage is likely to be “very low”. Furthermore the study found that the “probability of locating significant archaeological heritage remains during implementation of the project is likely to be improbable”. The study recommended “that Erf 217 is suitable for development” and that “care should be taken not to disturb in any way the integrity of the small cemeteries located on the (northern and) eastern boundary(ies) of the property”.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO ��

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES �� NO

If yes, please submit or, make sure that the applicant or a specialist submit the necessary application to SAHRA or the relevant provincial heritage agency and attach proof thereof to this application.

Heritage Western Cape decided to approve the development proposal and to recommend that no mitigation is necessary for the commencement of the project – see the Consolidated Record of Decision, September 2006 (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters).

Alternative S2:

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site?

YES NO

UNCERTAIN

If YES, explain: Not applicable.



Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO


YES NO


Alternative S3: Not applicable

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including archaeological or palaeontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site?

YES NO

UNCERTAIN


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

23

If YES, explain:



Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO


YES NO


Please note: Heritage Western Cape / South African Heritage Resource Agency (which ever is the competent authority under the circumstance) comments needs to be submitted along with this Basic Assessment Report.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

24

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

The person conducting the public participation process must fulfil the requirements outlined in Regulation 56 and also take

into account this Department’s guideline on Public participation.

Please tick (“��”) the appropriate box to indicate whether the specific requirement was undertaken or whether

exemption has been applied for.

1. Were all potential interested and affected parties notified of the application by –

(a) having fixed a notice board at a place conspicuous to the public at the boundary or on the fence of -

(i) the site where the activity to which the application relates is or is to be undertaken

and

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(ii) any alternative site mentioned in the application (Not applicable) YES NO EXEMPTION

(b) having given written notice to –

(i) the owners and occupiers of land adjacent to the site where the activity is or is to

be undertaken or to any alternative site

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(ii) the owners and occupiers of land within 100 metres of the boundary of the site or

alternative site who are or may be directly affected by the activity

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(iii) the municipal councillor of the ward in which the site or alternative site is situated

and any organisation of ratepayers that represents the community in the area

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(iv) the municipality which has jurisdiction in the area; and YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(v) any organ of state having jurisdiction in respect of any aspect of the activity YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(c) having placed an advertisement in –

(i) one local newspaper, or YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

(ii) the official EIA Gazette (Not applicable) YES NO EXEMPTION

(d) having placed an advertisement in at least one provincial newspaper or national

newspaper, if the activity has or may have an impact that extends beyond the

boundaries of the metropolitan or local municipality in which it is or will be undertaken.

(This requirement need not be complied with if an advertisement has been placed in

the official EIA Gazette referred to in (c)(ii) above. (Not applicable)

YES NO EXEMPTION

2. Was a register of interested and affected parties opened, maintained and made

available to any person requesting access to the register in writing? (See copy of

register in Appendix E)

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

3. Were all registered interested and affected parties given access to this application

form and basic assessment report and any other report(s) compiled in relation to this

application and was an opportunity for interested and affected parties to comment on

the report(s) in writing provided?

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

4. Were stakeholders that have direct interests in the site or property, such as servitude

holders and service providers, informed of the application at least 30 (thirty) calendar

days before the submission of this application and were they provided with the

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

25

opportunity to comment. (Comments to be included in the comments and response

report as described below)

5. Were Municipalities and other organs of state notified and given an opportunity to

comment? (This information must also be included in the comments and response

report)

YES

�� NO EXEMPTION

Please note: Proof of all of the above must be submitted as part of the public participation information to be attached to this basic

assessment report as Appendix E. Should any of the responses be “No” and no application for exemption from that requirement was

applied for, the Department will not proceed with evaluating / processing the application until that specific requirement is undertaken. Any

exemption application must be brought to the attention of all interest and affected parties through the public participation process.

The practitioner must record all comments and respond to each comment of the public / interested and affected party before the application

is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a Comments and Responses Report as prescribed in the regulations

and must also include a description of the public participation process followed and this report must also be included in the public

participation information to be attached to this basic assessment report as Appendix E.

If an application is for a linear or ocean-based activity and strict compliance with the above requirements is inappropriate, the person

conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by this

Department.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

26

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT Please note: The information in this section must be duplicated for all the alternatives (where relevant).

1. WASTE, EFFLUENT AND EMISSION MANAGEMENT

(a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid waste (including rubble) during the construction phase? YES ��

NO

If yes, what estimated quantity during the construction period? ± 400 m3

Where and how will the construction solid waste be treated / disposed of (describe)?

Solid waste, primarily building rubble generated by the construction activities, will be transported to the Municipal Landfill Site and disposed of there. There is sufficient capacity at the existing solid waste disposal site at Worcester for the disposal of surplus and unsuitable material (building rubble) generated during the construction phase (Appendix F: Municipal Services Letter).

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES ��

NO

If Yes, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? ± 114 m3

Where and how will the solid waste be treated / disposed of (describe)?

Solid waste consisting of household and garden waste will be collected and disposed of weekly as per the normal Municipal cleansing procedure.

Has the municipality or relevant authority confirmed that sufficient capacity exists for treating / disposing of the solid waste to be generated by this activity(ies)? If yes, provide written confirmation from Municipality or relevant authority.

YES ��

NO

Will the activity produce solid waste that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility other than into a municipal waste stream?

YES NO ��

If yes, has this facility confirmed that sufficient capacity exist for treating / disposing of the solid waste to be generated by this activity(ies)? Provide written confirmation from the facility and provide the following particulars of the facility:

YES NO

Does the facility have an operating license? (If yes, please attach a copy of the license.) YES NO

Facility name:

Contact person:

Postal address:

Postal code:

Telephone: Cell:

E-mail: Fax:

(b) Effluent

Will the activity produce sewage and or any other effluent? YES ��

NO

Normal domestic / household sewage will be produced.

What estimated quantity will be produced per month? ± 1 414 m3

Will the effluent be treated and/or disposed of in a municipal system? YES ��

NO


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

27

If Yes, has the municipality or relevant authority confirmed that sufficient unallocated capacity exists for treating / disposing of the sewage or any other effluent to be generated by this activity(ies)? Provide written confirmation from the Municipality or relevant authority. The Development falls within the existing Rawsonville Drainage Area and within the sewer priority area. The sewer flow was calculated for the Master Plan with a Peak Day Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) of 43.0 kl / day. Re-analysis produced a value of 46.5 kl / day (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The CES report finds that there “is sufficient capacity in the sewer reticulation system to accommodate the proposed development”. Furthermore it finds that “no adjustments to the proposed master plan items of June 2006 are required to accommodate the measured flow from the development, except for Item 1 required to connect to the existing system” (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The CES report estimates the incremental cost of the proposed development on the relevant master plan items to be in the region of R 133 000. (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department state in their letter of 11 June 2007, that “the existing Rawsonville Waste Water Treatment Works (RwTW), has reached its full capacity in terms of COD loading” and is in need of upgrading. The municipality’s letter furthermore states that “there is insufficient capacity in the existing Rawsonville RwTW to accommodate the proposed Development” and that the present RwTW will require “augmentation” due to this and other future developments (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal Services letter, 2007). The engineers also provide a programme that “shows that demands on the sewer systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale. By this time the upgrading of the sewer works will allow additional flows” (Appendix F). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning sewerage be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development. Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters.

Will any effluent produced be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO ��

If yes, briefly describe the nature of the effluent and how it will be disposed of:

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility? YES NO ��

If yes, has this facility confirmed that sufficient capacity exist for treating / disposing of the liquid effluent to be generated by this activity(ies)? Provide written confirmation from the facility and provide the following particulars of the facility:

YES NO

Does the facility have an operating license? (If yes, please attach a copy of the license.) YES NO

Facility name:

Contact person:

Postal address:

Postal code:

Telephone: Cell:

E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

Water use to keep dust levels down during the construction phase will be kept to a minimum by spraying water only when necessary. In terms of the operational phase, the Developer intends planting water wise, indigenous plants in open spaces and public areas. The Home Owners Association and their members, through the Architectural Guidelines, are encouraged to conserve water where possible, including creating awareness of grey water re-use systems, water wise gardens and water-efficient irrigation systems.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

28

(c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity produce emissions that will be disposed of into the atmosphere? YES NO ��

If yes, does it require approval in terms of relevant legislation? YES NO ��

Describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration and how it will be treated/mitigated:

The initial clearing of vineyard and earthmoving for the construction of internal roads and laying of pipes may result in higher dust levels than usual. The Developer undertakes to keep dust levels down by applying water regularly and exposing the least area possible during clearing.

2. WATER USE Please indicate the source(s) of water for the activity by ticking (“�”) the appropriate box(es)

Municipal ��

Water board Groundwater River, Stream, Dam or

Lake �� Other The activity will not use water

If water is to be extracted from a groundwater source, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month:

+- 2 023 m3

Please provide proof of assurance of water supply e.g. letter of confirmation from municipality / water user associations, yield of borehole

Does the activity require a water use permit / license from DWAF? YES ��

NO

If yes, please submit the necessary application to Department of Water Affairs and Forestry and attach proof thereof to this application. Master planning indicated that this development area should be accommodated in the existing Rawsonville zone (CES, 2007). The connection to the existing system should be done on the new 160mm diameter pipe in Botha Street (Refer Figure 1 in Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The original water analysis for the master plan was done with a total annual daily demand (AADD) for the development as calculated by Community Engineering Services (CES):

95 Residential Erven @ 0.7 kl / day / unit Total = 66.5 kl / day (Appendix H: Engineering Reports CES Report 2007).

Fire flow criteria = 15 l / s @ 7m (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007).

Accommodation of the development in the present system will require upgrading of the existing system. The CES Report furthermore states that the incremental water cost of the proposed development on the relevant master plan items is in the region of R 830 760.00 (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department states in their letter of 11 June 2007, that the current water distribution system has “insufficient capacity at Rawsonville to accommodate the proposed development. Additional raw water sources are required due to the influence of the proposed development together with other future development areas in the existing system”. The letter concludes that “The Developer of the proposed Development will be liable for Bulk Service Levies (as calculated by the Breede Valley Municipality) as a contribution towards water, sewerage and network extension and contribution costs for the embankment protection of the Smalblaar River” (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal services letter). Subsequent to the municipality’s letter the Developer met with the Landowner and has signed an agreement to purchase agricultural water to secure sufficient water supply for the development (Appendix F: Purchase agreement regarding water


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

29

resources and supply). The Developer provides a programme that “shows that demands on the bulk water systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale.” (Appendix F – Water demand timeframe). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning water supply be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development. The letters regarding assurance of water supply from the Breede Valley Municipality and the Developer’s consulting engineers are attached in Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters.

3. POWER SUPPLY Please indicate the source of power supply e.g. Municipality / Eskom / Renewable energy source.

Eskom will be able to provide electricity to the proposed residential development from the Rawsonville 66/11kV substation. It is expected to connect the erven to the underground system at the existing mini-sub RAWMA2 (Appendix F: Permits, Licenses & Supporting Letters). Accommodation of the development in the existing system will require augmentation and this will attract network extension and the related cost to the Developer (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Letter regarding assurance of municipal services).

If power supply is not available, where will power be sourced from?

Not applicable

4. ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Describe the design measures, if any, that have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:

The Developer intends utilizing the latest technology in energy efficient lighting for street lighting. The Home Owners Association and their members will be made aware of the benefits of using energy efficient geysers, household appliances and lighting, through interventions from Eskom’s Demand Side Management unit. See Appendix B: Architectural Guideline.

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:

Not applicable

5. NOISE IMPACTS

Will the activity result in any noise impacts during the construction phase? YES ��

NO

If yes, please describe and indicate the measures proposed to mitigate and manage these impacts?

Normal levels of noise, associated with heavy earth moving and construction vehicles are anticipated. Apart from the usual mitigating effects of well maintained exhaust silencers, the Developer also will restrict work to normal day-time hours (i.e. 08h00 – 17h00). No heavy machinery should operate on Saturdays, Sundays, or on public holidays.

Will the activity result in any noise impacts during its operational phase? YES NO ��



REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

30

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential noise impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

6. VISUAL IMPACTS

Will the activity result in any visual impacts? YES ��

NO


The Subject Land parcel is surrounded by a variety of land uses including agricultural, residential, public roads, and light and medium industry. This highly diverse background landscape and the flatness of the terrain limit the potential visual impact significantly. In terms of the Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists (DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005), no indicators are triggered in terms of the receiving environment. Furthermore, the medium density residential development (Category 3) occurs on an “area of low scenic, cultural, historical significance / disturbed” site and thus “Minimal visual impact is expected”. The Developer has produced architectural guidelines which will control and limit the colour, style and height of the houses, ensuring that the development blends in with the surrounding residential areas, while preserving a “sense of place”. The proposed densities (22 – 26 units per hectare) are well within the upper limit of 50 units per hectare set by the Worcester Zoning Scheme regulations.

Will the activity result in potential lighting impacts at night? YES ��

NO


Street lighting will be provided along interior streets, public open space and at road intersections. The lighting will face downward to minimize light pollution. The Municipality (and where applicable the Home Owners Association) will further control the use and nature of exterior lighting on individual houses during the Operational Phase.

Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the land use character of the area and potential visual impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies.

7. SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE ACTIVITY

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? R71 - 90 million

A figure of R58,5 million was provided by the Developer. It includes the initial purchase of the land (R4.8 million for the Subject Land), a contribution to the municipality in terms of upgrading water and sewerage services (R 963,760.00), the construction of roads, water, sewer storm water and electrical services and landscaping (6.5 million), the construction of the 95 single residential units (R44.7 million) consultation and professional fees (R1.4 million) and marketing of the development (R150 000).

What is the expected yearly income or contribution to the economy that will be generated by or as a result of the activity?

± R650 000

The 95 residential units would contribute between R3000 and R4000 annually at current value. The resulting yield would entail an amount of between R549 000 and R732 000.

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES ��

NO

All new projects within the Breede Valley Municipal Area are required to make a standard capital contribution towards general service infrastructure. It is estimated that the proposed development will be make a contribution of R6 000 per erf towards sewerage and R10 000 per erf towards water infrastructure.

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the construction phase of the activity? ± 50 - 150


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

31

Given the relatively small scale and short duration of the project, skills training of new construction labourers is not deemed feasible. Instead, the developer intends to make use of labour provided by one of a number of established construction companies in the Worcester area. While the appointment of contractors is contingent upon approval of the project, it is reasonable to assume that service providers in the Breede River Valley area will be appointed. This is motivated by factors of proximity and a well-established construction sector in Worcester. It is estimated that between 50 and 150 employment opportunities associated with actual construction activities (excluding consultants and designers) will be created, for a minimum of 9 months.

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the construction phase? R15 million to R18 million

Construction costs for the proposed development are estimated between R60 and R70 million (L. Verwoerd, pers comm, 2007). Within the building trade, a figure of 30% of total cost is generally accepted as a reasonable fraction for labour expenses. Subsequently, a figure of between R15 and R18 million may be estimated to accrue to construction labourers. A figure of R1.4 million was provided by the Developer with regard to consulting and other professional fees.

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? ± 90 %

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain):

The Developer has expressed a commitment to appoint a locally-based BEE-compliant contractor. It is envisaged that all local BEE-compliant contractors will be invited to tender. Work records will be kept and are open to inspection by the Department of Labour.

How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?

< 82

It can be reasonably estimated that 2 permanent maintenance and 3.5 security guard opportunities will be created. Furthermore, it is estimated that two domestic worker employment opportunities could exist for every 5 homes and a further two garden worker employment opportunities per 5 homes i.e. 95 / 5 x 2 x 2 = 76 + 2 + 3.5 opportunities

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years? Up to R 21 million

38 Domestic workers at a current minimum weekly rate of R265.91 /week (two out of every 5 houses). 38 Gardeners at a current minimum weekly rate of R265.91 /week (two out of every 5 houses). 2 Permanent maintenance personnel at R600 /week. 3.5 Permanent Security Guards (Grade E) at R5.45/hr for a 48hr week. An escalation of 8% increase per annum.

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? ± 90%

How will this be ensured and monitored (please explain):

Given the nature of the opportunities (unskilled to semi-skilled), it is reasonable to expect that virtually all would accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals. Given Rawsonville’s location, it is further reasonable to expect that such individuals would be from within the Rawsonville area, or at the most remote, Worcester. Employment provision for security, grounds and maintenance personnel would be a function of the Home Owner’s Association. Employment of domestic servants and gardeners by individual homeowners would be the prerogative of individual homeowners themselves. The developer is therefore not in a position to stipulate measures in order to ensure that available opportunities accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals. The nature of available opportunities are however likely to mean that they will naturally accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

32

8. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the planning, design and construction phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (Preferred site, activity and layout option – Construction Phase)

Potential impacts:

Significance rating of impacts (Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):

Proposed mitigation:

Significance rating of impacts after mitigation(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):

Faunal Biodiversity - Loss of species and habitat (Birds, Rodents & Reptiles) due to transformation of land.

Past farming activities have destroyed the original wildlife habitat. However highly adaptive species such as the Helmeted Guineafowl (Numida meleagris) and rodents (field mice) would have benefited from the cultivated food sources (grasses, oats and grapes).

A small possibility exists that reptiles (tortoises, lizards and snakes) may be present on the farmed land.

Low

Any tortoises or other reptiles found should be relocated to places of safety and not harmed in any way. If work is done in summer, tortoises are very evident. The Tortoise Farm Nature Reserve is situated nearby (on the Wolseley to Worcester road) and any rescued tortoises should be taken to this place of safety where they will be relocated at a later stage.

The Helmeted Guinea Fowl is quite an adaptive species and will more than likely move to a suitably wooded area close by.

No hunting or trapping of animals to be permitted.

Low

Floral Biodiversity – loss of species due to transformation of land

A number of large indigenous and exotic trees grow along the development’s western boundary (Botha Street).

Medium-Low

Care should be taken not to damage or disturb the trees.

Low

Floral Ecosystem – loss of vegetation type due to transformation of land.

Not applicable - the current land use is agriculture (vineyard).

None

Not applicable

None


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

33

Floral Ecosystem – loss of habitat due to transformation of land

Not applicable - the current land use is agriculture (vineyard).

None

Not applicable

None

Hydrological – Storm Water System

Initially storm water runoff will be as per natural state i.e. infiltration into soils.

The construction of roads, associated compacting of soils and land transformation will result in higher levels of storm water runoff.

Low

Storm water run-off generated within the development will be accommodated within the internal storm water networks which will consist of underground pipes, concrete manholes and kerb inlets. The pipes will be sized to cater for a storm with a recurrence of 1:2 years. Larger runoffs will be catered for by overland escape routes along tarred kerbed roads. All storm water will be channelled towards the south-eastern corner of the site from where it will be taken in an open lined canal across the Remainder of Erf 217 in a south-easterly direction, to the Smalblaar River (Appendix H: V&V Engineering, May 2007).

Low

Hydrological – Water Supply Sufficient bulk water resources exist to assure supply to the proposed Cabriere Estate development. The construction phase of the development will require very little water.

Low

Personnel will be instructed not to waste water during the construction phase.

For water use during the Operational Phase – see below.

Low

Waste – Sewage / Effluent

Very little sewage will be generated during the construction phase.

Low

Portable toilets will be supplied for personnel during the construction phase of the development.

Thereafter, suitable connection to the municipal sewerage system will take place (see Operational Phase below).

Low

Waste – Building Rubble & Littering

It is estimated that an approximately 50 m3 of

building rubble will be generated during the construction of the internal roads and perimeter walls.

Low

The building waste will be transported at the Building Contractors / Developer’s cost to the Municipality’s landfill site in Worcester.

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

34

Building of the proposed 95 townhouses will be undertaken by the Developer as part of this phase and the activity will generate approximately 350 m

3 of building waste and

rubble.

Littering may occur by personnel during construction phase.

Waste and litter drums will be placed at strategic points for use by personnel. The drums will be regularly emptied and waste removed by the Municipal cleansing department for disposal at the landfill site.

The Developer will display an all-hours telephone number on the site for emergency calls or complaints.

Land transformation – Dust Levels

Increased dust levels due to the clearing of vegetation, earthmoving activities and movement of vehicles may impact on air quality and possibly the vineyards.

Medium

The Developer should ensure that dust levels are kept to a minimum by:

Exposing only those areas to be developed i.e. areas corresponding to road surfaces and pipelines.

Keeping these areas and access routes moist by applying water at regular intervals.


Low

Land transformation – Noise Levels

Increased levels of noise due to earthmoving and construction activities. Associated noise may potentially impact on adjacent residential neighbourhood.

Low

The Developer will ensure that noise levels are kept to a minimum by:

Limiting operation of heavy earthmoving equipment and construction activities to normal working hours, and to normal work days (i.e. Monday to Friday, between 08h00 and 17h00).

Silencers (sound bafflers) will be maintained to ensure effective sound dampening.


Low

Land transformation – Visual Impact No indicators are triggered in terms of the receiving environment (Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005). The low-medium density residential development (Category 3) occurs on an “area of low scenic, cultural, historical significance / disturbed” site and thus

Low

The Developer has produced architectural guidelines which control and limit the colour, style and height of the houses, thereby ensuring that the development blends in with the surrounding residential areas.

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

35

“Minimal visual impact is expected”. Street lighting will be provided along interior streets, public open space and at road intersections.

Street lighting will face downward to minimize light pollution.

Land transformation - Veldfire

Machinery and human activity may increase veldfire risk levels.

Low

The Developer will ensure that firefighting equipment is available in the event that an accidental fire should break out.

Grading of areas demarcated for and the construction of internal roads will act as firebreaks.

Construction workers will not be allowed to make fires on the site.


Low

Increased levels of traffic: The transportation of construction and road material will increase heavy traffic in Botha and Porter streets for a short period (6 - 9 months) during the construction phase.

Low

The Developer will ensure that traffic flow is not impeded by avoiding the transportation of materials during peak traffic hours of 07h00– 08h00am and 16h00 – 17h00.

Low

Heritage Resources: The Heritage Archaeological specialist found “a possibly heavily pecked anvil and a tractor-damaged Early Stone Age flake”. The study concluded that the archaeological heritage remains are of “low local significance” and that the impact of the proposed development on archaeological heritage is likely to be “very low”. Furthermore the study found that the “probability of locating significant archaeological heritage remains during implementation of the project is likely to be improbable”.

Medium (with a low probability)

The study recommended “that Erf 217 is suitable for development” and that “care should be taken not to disturb in any way the integrity of the small cemeteries located on the (northern and) eastern boundary(ies) of the property”. In the event of any human or archaeological remains being uncovered, the site should be demarcated (fenced off) and Heritage Western Cape informed as soon as possible.

Low

Socio-Economic: Casual labour taking advantage of the job opportunities created by the construction phase may increase the number of people loitering, levels of vagrancy and possibly petty crime.

Medium

The Developer will secure the building site by erecting a palisade fence early in the construction phase.

The Developer should ensure that the appointed building contractor manages his/her labour force in such a way as to discourage the employment of casual

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

36

labour.

Labour should be transported to and from work.

Labour brokering, if allowed, should be dealt with off-site.

Alternative S1 (Preferred site, activity / Alternative layout option – Construction Phase)

Potential impacts:

Significance rating of impacts(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very High):



Most impacts will be Identical, as per the Preferred Layout Option, and will occur during the Planning, Design and Construction Phase (see above). The construction of a higher number of houses, namely 110 townhouses as described in this alternative will create the following additional impacts:

Increased volume of building rubble and waste, approximately 60 m

3 extra, will be

generated during the construction phase.

See above Low

Identical mitigations are proposed (see above). The building rubble and waste will be transported to the municipal landfill site.

See above Low

Alternative S2 (Preferred activity / Alternative site option – Construction Phase)

Potential impacts:




Not applicable None Not applicable None

Alternative S1 and S2 (No-go Option – Construction Phase)

Potential impacts:



Significance rating of impacts after mitigation(Low, Medium, Medium-High, High, Very


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

37

High):

Should the No-go Option be implemented this activity would per definition not entail any construction impacts – see Operational Phase for description of possible impacts should farming activities resume.

None

Not applicable None

9. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE OPERATIONAL PHASE Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the operational phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (Preferred site, activity and layout option - Operational Phase)

Potential impacts:




Impacts on Fauna & Flora:

Loss of species and or habitat due to transformation.

No additional impacts are expected during the operational phase.

None Not applicable None

Hydrological – Storm water:

Land transformation due to the establishment of housing may result in higher levels of storm water runoff.

Low

Storm water run-off generated within the development will be accommodated within the internal storm water networks which will consist of underground pipes, concrete manholes and kerb inlets. The pipes will be sized to cater for a storm with a recurrence of 1:2 years. Larger runoffs will be catered for by overland escape routes along tarred kerbed roads. All storm water will be channelled towards the south-eastern corner of the site from where it will be taken in an open lined canal across the Remainder of Erf 217 in a south-easterly direction, to the Smalblaar River (Appendix H: V&V Engineering, May 2007).

Low

Hydrological – Water Resources, Bulk System & Reticulation


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

38

The original water analysis for the master plan was done with a total annual daily demand (AADD) for the development as calculated by Community Engineering Services (CES): 95 Residential Erven @ 0.7 kl / day / unit Total = 66.5 kl / day or 24272 m

3/a

(Appendix H: Engineering Reports CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department states in their letter of 11 June 2007, that the current water distribution system has “insufficient capacity at Rawsonville to accommodate the proposed development. Accommodation of the development in the present system will require upgrading of the existing system. “Additional raw water sources are required due to the influence of the proposed development together with other future development areas in the existing system”.

Medium

Master planning indicated that this development area should be accommodated in the existing Rawsonville zone (CES, 2007).

The CES Report recommend that the Developer makes a pro-rata contribution towards upgrading the water supply system, to the order of R830 760.

The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department mentions that a Development Contribution will be payable, but do not give a figure. “The Developer of the proposed Development will be liable for Bulk Service Levies (as calculated by the Breede Valley Municipality) as a contribution towards water, sewerage and network extension and contribution costs for the embankment protection of the Smalblaar River” (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal services letter). Subsequent to the municipality’s letter the Developer met with the Landowner and has signed an agreement to purchase agricultural water to secure sufficient water supply for the development (Appendix F: Purchase agreement regarding water resources and supply). The Developer provides a programme that “shows that demands on the bulk water systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale.” (Appendix F – Water demand timeframe). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning water supply be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development.

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

39

Waste - Sewage / Effluent: The sewer flow was calculated for the Master Plan with a Peak Day Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) of 43.0 kl / day. Re-analysis produced a value of 46.5 kl / day (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The CES report finds that there “is sufficient capacity in the sewer reticulation system to accommodate the proposed development. Furthermore it finds that “no adjustments to the proposed master plan items of June 2006 are required to accommodate the measured flow from the development, except for Item 1 required to connect to the existing system” (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007). The Breede Valley Municipality’s Operational Services Department, in their letter of the 11 June 2007, state that “the existing Rawsonville Waste Water Treatment Works (RwTW), has reached its full capacity in terms of COD loading” and is in need of upgrading. The municipality’s letter furthermore states that “there is insufficient capacity in the existing Rawsonville RwTW to accommodate the proposed Development” and that the present RwTW will require “augmentation” due to this and other future developments (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality – Municipal Services letter, 2007).

Medium

The Development falls within the existing Rawsonville Drainage Area and within the sewer priority area. The CES report estimates the incremental cost of the proposed development on the relevant master plan items to be in the region of R 133 000. (Appendix H: Engineering Reports - CES Report 2007).

The engineers also provide a programme that “shows that demands on the sewer systems will only be required approximately 11-12 months after an Environmental Authorisation has been issued and even then it will be on a limited scale. By this time the upgrading of the sewer works will allow additional flows.” (Appendix F). The Developer and their engineers request a meeting with the Department of Environmental Affairs should the issue concerning sewerage be perceived to be a stumbling block to the approval of the development.

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

40

Waste – Domestic:

It is estimated that approximately 114 m3 of

domestic waste will be generated per month by the 95 homes.

Sufficient capacity exists at the solid waste disposal site to accept domestic waste from the development during its operational phase (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality Letter).

Low

The Home Owners Association will uphold and implement any applicable Municipal By-laws pertaining to waste.

Domestic waste will be removed once a week as per the normal routine and disposed of at the Municipal landfill site.

Waste and litter drums will be placed at strategic points for use by the public. The drums will be emptied regularly.

Waste minimization strategies should be investigated by the Municipality and Home Owners Association to encourage the composting of vegetative waste and recycling of glass, paper and plastics.

Low

Land transformation – Noise Levels:

Increased levels of noise due to an additional potential 95 households residing in the area and making use of vehicles. The Development is proposed for an area which already accommodates residential uses nearby.

Low

The Home Owners Association should uphold and implement any applicable Municipal By-laws pertaining to noise levels.

The Developer will plant appropriate shade and decorative shrubs and trees along the Brandwacht Road boundary wall to mitigate noise impact.

Low

Land transformation – Visual Impact:

The Subject Land parcel is surrounded by a variety of land uses including agricultural, residential, public roads and light industry. This highly diverse background landscape and the flatness of the terrain limit the potential visual impact significantly. In terms of the Guideline for Involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists (DEA&DP Guidelines Series 2005), no indicators are triggered in terms of the receiving environment. Furthermore, the medium density residential development (Category 3) occurs on an “area of low scenic, cultural, historical significance / disturbed” site and thus “Minimal visual impact is expected”.

Low

The Development lies within the declared Urban Edge of Rawsonville. The Developer has produced architectural guidelines which will control and limit the colour, style and height of the houses, ensuring that the development blends in with the surrounding residential areas, while preserving a “sense of place”. The proposed densities (23 units per hectare) are well within the upper limit of 50 units per hectare set by the Worcester Zoning Scheme regulations.

The Developer will ensure that the large indigenous and other trees growing along Botha Street are protected and conserved.

Low

Traffic Impact:

Low

Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

41

It is estimated, using trip generators (vehicle per hour trip) of 1.1 for permanent residences and 0.20 for retired persons, that the occupants of the 95 townhouses, with a 75:25 directional split, for am and pm respectively, that the proposed development of 95 units consisting of 57 – 60% permanent residences and 38 – 40% units owned by retired persons would result in the following: AM: IN 18, AM OUT 53 AM: TOTAL 71 PM: IN 53, PM OUT 18 PM: TOTAL 71 It was thus concluded that the additional traffic flow would have a negligible effect on the current traffic volumes.

The Developer should uphold any conditions set by the Breede Valley Municipal with regard to traffic safety and parking facilities.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

42

Alternative S1 (Preferred activity / Alternative layout option - Operational Phase)

Potential impacts:




Impacts on Fauna & Flora:

Identical impacts to the preferred layout (see above).

n.a. None n.a.

Hydrological – Storm water:

Identical impacts to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Identical mitigation to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Hydrological – Water Resources, Bulk Supply and Reticulation:

The additional 15 dwellings would require an extra 3833m

3 /a water, totalling 28105m

3 /a

compared to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Additional raw water resources would be purchased from farmer. Greater Development Contributions would be made to cover additional capacity as required, otherwise Identical mitigation to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Water Supply - Distribution System:

The additional 15 dwellings would require an additional 3833m

3 /a water, totalling

28105m3

/a compared to the preferred layout (see above).

Medium-Low

Additional raw water resources would be purchased from farmer. Greater Development Contributions would be made to cover additional capacity as required, otherwise Identical mitigation to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Waste - Sewage / Effluent: The additional 15 dwellings in this layout option, will increase sewage volumes by an estimated 223 m

3 /month i.e. to

1638m3/month.

This will place greater pressure on the municipal waste water treatment works.

Medium-Low

Greater Development Contributions would be made to cover additional capacity as required, otherwise Identical mitigation to the preferred layout (see above).

Low

Waste – Domestic:

It is calculated that an estimated 132 m3 of

domestic waste will be generated per month by the 110 dwellings.

Sufficient capacity exists at the solid waste disposal site (Appendix F: Breede Valley Municipality Letter).

Low


Low


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

43

Land transformation – Noise Levels:

Increased levels of noise due to an additional potential 15 households residing in the area. The Development is proposed for an area which already accommodates residential, light industrial and intensive agricultural uses.

Low

The Home Owners Association should uphold and implement any applicable Municipal By-laws pertaining to noise levels.

Low

Land transformation – Visual Impact:

Compared to the Preferred Layout this slightly higher density layout (26 dwelling units / ha) will not significantly increase the visual impact.

Low


Low

Traffic Impact: An additional 15 dwellings will proportionally increase the traffic impact by an additional 10 AM and 10 PM trips, totalling 81 trips in the morning and 81 trips in the afternoon. It is concluded that the additional traffic flow would have a negligible effect on the current traffic volumes.

Low


Low

Alternative S3 (No-go Option - Operational Phase)

Potential impacts:




Should the proposed development not go ahead, it is likely that the property will revert back to agricultural cultivation. Associated impacts would include: Noise from ploughing and other agricultural activities using tractors and heavy equipment. Dust irritation and allergies from ploughing, working the land and harvesting crops.

Low Medium

Excess noise will be controlled by maintaining the equipment and sound bafflers. Heavy work will take place during daylight hours. Ploughing usually takes place during the driest part of the year, late summer just before winter rains and thus it is

Low Medium


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

44

Emissions and pollution from the use of agricultural chemicals. The use of herbicides and pesticides will drift into neighbouring residential areas, and with it the associated potential health risks. The use of chemical fertilizers may lead to groundwater and surface water contamination over time. Increased possibility of erosion and resulting increased levels of silt in the Smalblaar River. Loss of opportunities in terms of potential short and long term employment.

Medium Medium Low Medium

very difficult to control. Spraying should be kept to a minimum and only applied on wind-still days. Fertilization should be kept to a minimum. Measures should be set in place to prevent erosion. The local authority’s LED policy would be tested to find additional employment opportunities.

Medium Medium-Low Low Low

10. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE DECOMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASE Briefly describe and compare the potential impacts (as appropriate), significance rating of impacts, proposed mitigation and significance rating of impacts after mitigation that are likely to occur as a result of the decommissioning and closure phase for the various alternatives of the proposed development. This must include an assessment of the significance of all impacts.

Alternative S1 (Preferred activity alternative - Decommissioning)

Potential impacts:




Decommissioning - not applicable. n.a. None n.a.

Alternative S2 (Preferred activity / Alternative layout option – Decommissioning)

Potential impacts:




Decommissioning - not applicable. n.a. None n.a.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

45

Alternative S3 (No-go Option - Decommissioning Phase)

Potential impacts:




Decommissioning - not applicable. n.a. n.a. n.a.

11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Describe potential impacts that, on their own may not be significant, but will be significant when added to the impact of other activities or existing impacts in the environment and substantiate response (The information in this section must be provided for all the alternatives as well):

Potential cumulative impacts as a result of the proposed development are restricted to water consumption, sewage removal and treatment and to a extent the traffic. These impacts are described above and in Appendix F (sewerage).

12. IMPACT SUMMARY OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Having assessed the significance of impacts of the various alternatives, please provide an overall summary and reasons for selecting the preferred alternative.

In terms of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed preferred development during the planning, design and construction phase, the most significant impacts are those related to increased levels of dust; socio-economic impacts associated with a potential increase in loitering and petty crime associated with casual labour. Other less significant impacts include increased noise and traffic levels due to construction vehicles and the low probability of uncovering human remains during earthworks. All of these impacts can be adequately addressed by the implementation of suitable mitigation measures.

In terms of potential impacts resulting from the proposed preferred development during the operational phase, the most significant impacts are those related to bulk water resources, reticulation and sewage removal and treatment. Other less significant impacts include increased levels of traffic in Porter and Botha streets. All of these impacts can be adequately addressed by the implementation of suitable mitigation measures and through payment of the development contributions in order to upgrade the infrastructure.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

46

The preferred layout option is selected above the alternative layout due to the wider roads and resulting lower housing density, this also translates into a lower water consumption and sewerage and waste production during the operational phase. The proposed housing development is preferred above the No-go Option for reasons due to the fact that the Subject Land Parcel is one of the last remaining pieces of suitable land within the defined urban edge of Rawsonville. The housing development will contribute more to the local economy in the short term (construction phase) and potentially create a larger number of permanent employment opportunities in the longer term (operational phase) than would the continued agricultural use of the land.

13. RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER

In my view (EAP), the information contained in this application form and the documentation attached hereto is sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for.

YES �� NO

If “NO”, list the aspects that should be further assessed through additional specialist input/assessment or whether this application must be subjected to a Scoping process before a decision can be made:

If “YES”, please list recommended conditions, including mitigation measures, that should in your view be considered for inclusion in an authorisation if the activity is authorised by the competent authority:

In our opinion the most significant mitigation measures / conditions would be: Construction Phase: Ensure that physical disturbances to the Subject Land be kept to a minimum, including the prevention of soil erosion and dust. In the event that human or archaeological remains are found, work in that area should stop, the area demarcated and the South African Heritage Resources Agency or Heritage Western Cape, be contacted respectively. Care should be taken not to disturb the small family and farm worker cemeteries close to the Subject Land. Ensure that firefighting equipment is available and that the personnel are trained. Prevent workers from starting open fires or cooking outside demarcated areas. Operational Phase: The Developer has committed to making a pro-rata Development Contribution towards water reticulation and sewage removal and treatment. The Developer has provided a timeframe which indicates when these services would be required and it appears that this will coincide with the augmentation and planned upgrades to the Waste Water Treatment Works.

Other conditions could include that the recommendations made in the Townhouse Architectural Guideline regarding water conservation and energy efficiency measures.


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

47

APPENDICES The following appendices must be attached where appropriate:

Appendix Tick (“aaaa”) box if Appendix is attached

Appendix A: Locality maps ��

Appendix B: Site plan(s) and Architectural Sketches & Plans ��

Appendix C: Owner(s) consent(s) ��

Appendix D: Site Photographs ��

Appendix E: Public participation information: including a copy of the register of interested and affected parties, the comments and responses report, proof of notices, advertisements and any other public participation information as required in Section D above.

��

Appendix F: Permit(s) / license(s) from any other organ of state including service letters from the municipality ��

Appendix G: Specialist Report(s): Agricultural Potential, Botanical Ecological, Heritage and Traffic. ��

Appendix H: Engineering Reports ��

Appendix I: Worcester & Environs Guideplan, Breede Valley Municipality SDF & Geological maps ��

Appendix J: Socio-Economic Data (Census 2001) ��


REF: E12/2/3/1 B2/22 0201/06

48

DECLARATIONS

The Applicant I…………………………………., in my personal capacity or duly authorized thereto hereby declare that:

• The information contained in this application form is true and correct, and

• I am fully aware of my responsibilities in terms of the National Environmental Management Act of 1989 (“NEMA”) (Act No. 107 of 1998) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (“EIA Regulations”) in terms of NEMA (Government Notice No. R. 385, R. 386, and R. 387 in the Government Gazette of 21 April 2006 refer), and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute an offence in terms of NEMA and the EIA Regulations.

Note: If acting in a representative capacity, a certified copy of the resolution or power of attorney must be attached.

Signature of the applicant:

Name of company:

Date:

The independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner I ……………………………………, as the appointed independent environmental practitioner hereby declare that:

• The information contained in this application form is true and correct, and

• I am fully aware of my responsibilities in terms of the National Environmental Management Act of 1989 (“NEMA”) (Act No. 107 of 1998) and the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations (“EIA Regulations”) in terms of NEMA (Government Notice No. R. 385, R. 386, and R. 387 in the Government Gazette of 21 April 2006 refer), and that failure to comply with these requirements may constitute an offence in terms of NEMA and the EIA Regulations.

Note: The terms of reference must be attached.

Signature of the environmental practitioner:

Name of company:

Date:

basic assessment report cabriere estate, erf 217, … · cabriere estate, erf 217, rawsonville ref:...

Documents