bc oral cmmunication

8/8/2019 Bc Oral Cmmunication

1/13

Transfer of information and knowledge fromsource to receiver.

Its the process by which the sender/ sourcereaches the receiver/ destination with thoughts,ideas, feelings, facts & values.

Successful communication is said to beaccomplished when the receiver not only receivesthe message but also accept, interpret and use it inthe manner intended by the source.


2/13

06/09/2010 Vivek Singh 2


3/13


The Communication Process

Involves two or more parties

One or more is the sender with intentions to convey

The intentions of the sender are expressed in amessage

The message is communicated by the sender interms of signals along some medium

One or more of the other parties is a receiver.Receivers have the ability to interpret the signals.


4/13


Sender

Source Encoding

Receiver

Reception

of the

message

by

receiver

Decoding

Use of

Message

Transmission

through a

channel

Feedback

The Communication Process (again..)


5/13

5

Types of Communication

Verbal

Written

Oral

Non Verbal

Sign Language

Action Language

Object Language

Perceived Attitude = 55% , Facial Exp. + 38% , Paralang. + 7% Verbal


6/13

ORAL COMMUNICATION:-

Oral communication describes any type of

inter-action that makes use of spoken words,

and it is a vital, integral part of the modernbusiness world. "The ability to communicate

effectively through speaking as well as in

writing is highly valued, and demanded in

business.


7/13

TYPES OF ORAL COMMUNICATION

1. One-on-One Speaking

(Student-Student or Student-

Teacher): Can range frommoments punctuating a lecture,

where students are asked to discuss

or explain some question or problemwith the person next to them, to

formal student conferences with their

instructor.

2. Small-Group or Team-BasedOral Work: Smaller-scale settings fordiscussion, deliberation, and problem

solving. Appropriate for both large

lectures and smaller classes and allows

levels of participation not possible in

larger groups.


8/13

3. Full-Class

Discussions (Teacher-or Student-Led): Typicallyargument-based, and

competitive than debate and

deliberation but still dialogic in

character. Often times has the

quality of creating an

atmosphere of collective, out-

loud thinking about some

question, idea, problem, text,

event, or artifact. Like

deliberation and debate, agood way to encourage active

learning.


9/13

4. In-Class Debates and Deliberations:

A structured consideration of some issue from two ormore points of view. Debates typically involve

participants who argue one side throughout, while

deliberation allows for movement by individuals

within the process. Both feature reason-givingargument. Can be applied to issues of many kinds,

from disputed scientific facts to theories, policy

questions, the meaning of a text, or the quality of an

artistic production. Can range from two participants

to a lecture hall.


10/13

5. Speeches and Presentations:

Classically, the stand-up, podiumspeech delivered by an individual from

an outline or script. Also includes

group presentations or impromptu

speaking. A strong element of

monologue, but dialogue can be built

in with question and answer or

discussion with the audienceafterward.


11/13

6. Oral Examinations: Cantake place in the instructors office,

in small groups, or before a whole

class. Range from one oral question

on an otherwise written exam to an

oral defense of a written answer orpaper to an entirely oral quiz or

examination. Difficult with very

large groups, but an excellent way to

determine the depth and range of

student knowledge and to stimulate

high levels of preparation.


12/13

THE ADVANTAGES OF ORAL COMMUNICATION

are fast - useful for obtaining very recent

unpublished information

are based on two-way communication and therefore

promote an understanding of the real informationneed(s) and the communication ofrelevant

information

are flexible

simplify and facilitate the transmission ofinformation between people working in different

subject areas.

are easy and pleasant to use


13/13

DISADVANTAGES OF ORAL

COMMUNICATION:- are not open to everyone - established

researchers have access to good networks of

contacts, but these usually take time tocultivate

can lead to misconceptions because the

information is sometimes incomplete (lack of

detail etc.)

are difficult to maintain and therefore

unstable.

bc oral cmmunication

Documents