beam delivery system simulation and detector backgrounds
DESCRIPTION
Beam Delivery System Simulation and Detector Backgrounds. Arlington Linear Collider Workshop January 9-11, 2003. Takashi Maruyama SLAC. “Collimation Task Force”. • Compare performance of the collimation system of TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC. • Review spoiler/absorber settings - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Beam Delivery System Simulation and Detector Backgrounds
Takashi MaruyamaSLAC
Arlington Linear Collider Workshop January 9-11, 2003
“Collimation Task Force”
December 16 - 18, 2002
• Compare performance of the collimation system of TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC.
• Review spoiler/absorber settings
• Halo collimation
• Particle loss calculation
• Sync. radiation collimation
NLC: S. Hertzbach, L. Keller, T. Markiewicz,T. Maruyama, T. Raubenheimer, A. Seryi, P. Tennenbaum, M.
Woodley
TESLA: O. Napoly, N. Walker
CLIC: G. Blair, D. Schulte, F. Zimmermann
FNAL: A. Drozhdin, N. Mokhov
TRC: W. Kozanecki
December 16 – 18, 2002
Background and collimation
• Major source of detector background: Halo particles hitting beamline components generate muons and low energy particles.Halo particles generate sync. radiations that hit VXD.Beam-gas scattering generates low energy particles.
• Collimate Halo particles:Spoilers and AbsorbersCollimation depth – (nxx, nyy)
Reduce halo size using Octupoles• What is Halo, and How much: Drozhdin’s 1/x-1/y model
Flat distribution with 50x,50x’,200y,200y’,3%E/E
Calculated halo ~10-6, but design collimation for 10-3.
NLC Detector Masking Plan View w 20mrad X-angle
LD – 3 Tesla SD – 5 Tesla
32 mrad30 mrad
R=1 cm
Apertures: 1 cm beampipe at the IP 1 cm at Z = -350 cm
2001 Collimation System & FF integrated design
New scheme of the Collimation Section and Final Focus with ODs
Energy collimation
Betatroncollimation
Final Focus
IP FD IP FD IP
FD
S SA SA SA A
A
FDA
Final Focuscollimation
AIP
Octupole Doublets
Beam Delivery Systems
TESLA
JLC/NLC
CLIC
Synchrotron radiations
FF doublet aperture 1 cm
bendsquads
Photons from quads
Photons from bends
Sync. Radiation vs. IP
ny
nx
cm
xIP
yIP
Track particle with n• backward from IP to AB10.
Track particle to IP and generate sync. radiations.
Find sync. radiation edge as a function of (nx, ny). nx = 18.5 x+, 17.2 x-
ny = 50.9 y
Find AB10 and AB9 apertures as a function of (nx, ny)
Sync. Radiations at IP
X (cm)
Y
X (cm)
Log10(E) (GeV)
Quad
Bend
.3 Ne-
<E>=4.8 MeVQuad
Bend
Spoiler/Absorber Settings for NLC
Spoilers/Absorbers Settings for NO OCT
Half aperturesX Y (um) xy
Sp1 ~ SP4 settings with OCT x2.5
Spoiler/Absorber Settings
TESLA
CLIC
Halo ModelX’
X (cm) Y (cm)
Y’
10-5
y (cm)
x (cm)
1/x and 1/y density over
Ax = (6 – 16)x and
Ay = (24 – 73)y – NLC/CLIC
Ax = (7 – 18)x and
Ay = (40 – 120)y – TESLA
E/E = 1% (Gaussian)
Halo rate 10-3
Particle loss distribution in NLC
Z (m)
OCT-OFF
OCT-ON
42% to IP
82% to IP
ESP
EAB
AB10
AB7
DP2
Integral Particle Loss Distribution
Integral Particle Loss Distribution NLC/TESLA/CLIC
250 GeV/beam Muon Endcap Background
Engineer for 10-3 Halo
Bunch Train =1012
Calculated Halo is 10-6
CollimationEfficiency 105
Muon Background
Beam Gas Scattering
Detector Background from Beam Gas Scattering
At 50 nT, 8.5 hits/train within +/- 15 m of IP2.5 hits/train on 1.2 cm VXD.
If the vacuum is reduced to 1 nTin the last 250 m of IP,0.2 hits/train within +/- 15 m of IP0.05 hits/train on 1.2 cm VXD.
Summary
• “Collimation Task Force” has been studying the beam delivery system of TESLA, JLC/NLC and CLIC.
• FF absorbers are set so that no sync. radiations hit the detector apertures.
• Assuming 10-3 halo, the particle loss is < 10-8 in FF and the muon background is tolerable.
• Octuples allow x2.5 looser spoiler settings.• Beam gas background in VXD is 0.05 hits/train
if the vacuum is 1 nT.