behindthebrandsrawopendata-feb262013
DESCRIPTION
pls read the titleTRANSCRIPT
3 6 3 3 2 4 4 6 3 6
1 5 1 2 2 1 2 4 2 2
1 5 3 2 2 3 3 6 3 5
2 4 5 5 4 2 2 7 5 6
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3
2 3 1 1 1 5 4 5 3 7
3 5 6 2 4 5 4 7 4 5
Total (out of 70) 13 29 20 16 16 21 20 38 22 34Total (out of 10) 2 4 3 2 2 3 3 5 3 5
Overall Percentage Score 19% 41% 29% 23% 23% 30% 29% 54% 31% 49%
Rank 10 3 6 8 8 5 6 1 4 2
<< click on the expand buttons to view the split per category
WORKERSGENDER
CLIMATE CHANGEWATER
LANDFARMERS
TRANSPARENCY
ABFCoca
-Cola
Danone
GM Kellogg
's
Mars
Mondelez
Nestle
PepsiCo
Unileve
r
Workers
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
W1 Company Awareness Relating to Workers 100.00
W1.1 33.33
W.1.2 33.33
W1.2.1 Does the company explicitly recognize payment of living wage? 4.17
W1.2.2 4.17
W1.2.3 4.17
W1.2.4 4.17
W1.2.4.1 - the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining? 2.08
W1.2.4.2 2.08
W1.2.5 4.17
W1.2.6 4.17
W1.2.7 Does the company explicitly recognize child labor as an issue? 4.17
W1.2.8 Does the company explicitly recognize forced labor as an issue? 4.17
W1.3 Partnerships with Suppliers 33.33
W1.3.1 16.67
W1.3.2 Does the project engage a trade union? 16.67
W2 Knowledge and Disclosure of Company Impacts 100.00
W2.1 20.00
W2.2 20.00
W2.3 20.00
Does the company recognize labor standards as defined by the ILO conventions and as it relates to its duty to source responsibly in their
agricultural supply chains?
Does the company explicitly recognize the following workers rights issues?
Does the company explicitly recognize job-security and permanent contracts for workers (precarious work)?
Does the company explicitly recognize the importance of grievance mechanisms available to workers?
Does the company recognize freedom of association and collective bargaining?
-including in countries where these rights are restricted by facilitating a parallel means of dialog and bargaining?
Does the company explicitly recognize the need protect migrant workers?
Does the company explicitly recognize the right to be free from discrimination?
Does the company have a project to address at least one of the following issues: FOA, LW, temporary employment, migrant labor, child labor,
bonded labor, or grievance mechanism?
Does the company track and report the number of workers in its supply chains?
Does the company track and report on the percentage of agricultural workers in its supply chain with No fixed contracts?
Does the company track and report on the percentage of workers that are covered by collective bargaining agreements?
W2.4 20.00
W2.4.1 - temporary workers? 5.00W2.4.2 - lack of freedom of association? 5.00W2.4.3 - migrant workers? 5.00W2.4.4 - child labor? 5.00
W2.5 Does the company publicly report on how grievances are addressed? 20.00
W3 Commitment to Good Practices on Labor 100.00
W3.1 12.50
W3.2 Has the company made an explicit commitment to living wage? 12.50
W3.3 Has the company made an explicit commitment to: 12.50
W3.3.1 - improving conditions for precarious workers? 6.25
W3.3.2 - reducing precarious work? 6.25
W3.4 12.50
W3.5 12.50
W3.6 12.50
W3.7 12.50
W3.8 12.50
W4 Supply Chain Management 100.00
W4.1 33.33
W4.1.1 - keep records on workers' rights issues? 4.17W4.1.2 - train workers about their rights? 4.17
W4.1.3 - Not discriminate? 4.17
W4.1.4 4.17
W4.1.5 - maintain an accessible, confidential grievances mechanism? 4.17
W4.1.6 4.17
W4.1.7 - maintain fair working hours? 4.17
W4.1.8 4.17
W4.2 Does the company require suppliers to: 33.33
W4.2.1 - pay workers a living wages? 16.67
W4.2.2 16.67
Does the company identify high-risk/issue regions (by commodity) on the following issues in its supply chain:
Has the company made a commitment to uphold the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights?
Has the company made an explicit commitment to eliminating child labor?
Has the company made an explicit commitment to eliminating forced or involuntary labor?
Is the company a member of any stakeholder groups which have as their aim the improvement of labor conditions in the supply chain?
Is the company a member of an organization aimed at sharing supply chain information and minimizing parallel audits?
Does the company have a commitment to constructive dialog with the IUF?
Does the company promote improved conditions for workers by requiring suppliers to:
- uphold the general right to freedom of association and collective bargaining?
- ensure job-security and permanent contracts for workers (precarious work)?
- provide healthy working conditions and, where provided, safe housing conditions, potable drinking water, adequate sanitation, etc?
- uphold freedom of association and right to collective bargaining including in countries where these rights are restricted by facilitating a
parallel means of dialog and bargaining?
W4.3 Does the company conduct and use audits effectively? 33.33
W4.3.1 8.33
W4.3.1.1 -to first tier suppliers? 2.78
W4.3.1.2 -to second tier suppliers? 2.78W4.3.1.3 -to third tier suppliers? 2.78W4.3.2 Do the audits consult workers? 8.33W4.3.3 Do the audits consult workers offsite? 8.33
W4.3.4 Does the company work with suppliers to address Non-compliance? 8.33
Total scoreAverage score
Does the company require audits to be conducted on supply sites to assess and improve compliance with its code of labor practice?
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
62.50
Yes 33.33 33.33
29.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
-
Yes 2.08
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.00
Partial 5.00 5.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
35.94
No 0.00 0.00
partial 3.13 3.13
- 1.56
No 0.00
Partial 1.56
Partial 3.13 3.13
partial 3.13 3.13
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
27.78
- 6.25
No 0.00No 0.00
Partial 1.04
Partial 1.04
Partial 1.04
Partial 1.04
Partial 1.04
Partial 1.04
- 8.33
Partial 4.17
Partial 4.17
13.19
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00
Partial 2.08No 0.00
Yes 8.33
131.2232.80
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 10 and 33, accesssed 02/14/14
Twinings, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 2, accessed 2/13/13
Twinings, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 3, accessed 2/13/13
Ethical Tea Partnership, ETP Global Standard, p. 19, accessed 02/14/14
Twinings, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 1, accessed 2/13/13
Twinings, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 1, accessed 2/13/13
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 33, accesssed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 40, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 29, accesssed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
Twinings, Ethical Tea, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 40, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 41, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 40, accesssed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
Ethical Tea Partnership, ETP Global Standard, p. 19, accessed 02/14/14
Ethical Tea Partnership, ETP Global Standard, p. 18, accessed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 40, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 41 and 38, accesssed 02/14/14
PGP Int'l, Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/14/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 36, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 9, accesssed 02/14/14
ABF, Corporate Responsibility Annual Report 2010, p. 38, accesssed 02/14/14
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
81.25
Yes 33.33 33.33
31.25
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
40.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 20.00
Yes 5.00Yes 5.00Yes 5.00Yes 5.00
Yes 20.00 20.00
81.25
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
- 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
43.06
- 20.83
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
22.22
- 5.56
Yes 2.78
Yes 2.78No 0.00Yes 8.33No 0.00
Yes 8.33
245.5661.39
Coca Cola Danone
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
2011/2012 Sustainability Report, accessed 2/14/13
Supplier Guiding Principles, page 47, accessed 2/14/13
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 02/14/13
Supplier Guiding Principles page 17, accessed 2/14/13
Supplier Guiding Principles, page 26, accessed 2/14/13
Country Studies, accessed 2/14/13
Supplier Guiding Principals, page 28, accessed 2/14/13
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 2/14/13
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 2/14/13
Business Leaders Initiative Report, page 53, accessed 2/14/17
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
Costa Rica Sugar Industry Macro Report, accessed 02/14/13Guatamala Sugar Industry Macro Report, accessed 02/14/13
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 02/14/13Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 2/14/13
2011/12 Sustainability Report, Human and Workplace Rights, accessed 02/14/13
Coca Cola, Human Rights Statement, accessed 02/14/13
2011/12 Sustainability Report, Human and Workplace Rights accessed 02/14/14
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 2/14/13
Coca Cola, Addressing Global Issues, accessed 2/14/13
Honest Tea 2011 Mission Report, accessed 02/13/14
Coca Cola, Stakeholder Engagement, accessed 02/13/14
Joint Statement of the Coca Cola Company and the International Union of Foodworkers
Coca Cola, Supplier Guiding Principles, accessed 2/13/14
Coca Cola, Supplier Guiding Principles, accessed 2/13/14
Workplace Rights Implementation Guide, page 25, accessed 02/13/14
Coca Cola, Supplier Guiding Principles, accessed 2/13/14
Coca Cola, Supplier Guiding Principles, accessed 2/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
2010/2011 Sustainability report, page 43, accessed 2/14/14
Oxfam Poverty Footprint Study, page 44, accessed 2/14/13
Workplace Rights Implementation Guide, page 12, accessed 02/13/14
Workplace Rights Implementation Guide, accessed 02/13/14
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
47.92
Yes 33.33 33.33
14.58
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
50.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
29.17
- 12.50
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
16.67
- 8.33
Yes 2.78
Yes 2.78Yes 2.78No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 8.33
127.0831.77
Danone General Mills
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
CP 4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.136 and 201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.136 and 201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.136 and 201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.136 and 201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.136 and 201, accessed 02/13/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.81, 202, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.162, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.201, accessed 02/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.80-81, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.89, accessed 02/13/14DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.89, accessed 02/13/14
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p.89, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
45.83
Yes 33.33 33.33
12.50
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
-
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
37.50
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
36.11
- 16.67
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
19.44
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00Yes 8.33No 0.00
Yes 8.33
119.4429.86
General Mills Kellogg's
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012, p. 54, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
CP 12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012, p. 57, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
General Mills Supplier Code of Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
14.58
No 0.00 0.00
14.58
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
37.50
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
8.33
- 8.33
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
60.4215.10
Kellogg's Mars
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 34, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 36, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 34, 36 and 43, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg, California Transparency in Supply Chain Act, accesseed 02/13/14
Kellogg, Commitment to Integrity, accessed 02/13/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
Kellogg, Responsible Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 36 and 43, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 34 and 43, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 34 and 93, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg, Responsible Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
Kellogg, Responsible Sourcing, accessed 02/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
81.25
Yes 33.33 33.33
14.58
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
5.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 5.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00Yes 5.00
No 0.00 0.00
37.50
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
31.94
- 12.50
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
- 19.44
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00Yes 8.33No 0.00
Yes 8.33
155.6938.92
Mars Mondelez
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Mars, Supplier Relationships, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 5, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 3 and 5, accessed 02/13/14
Mars website, ‘Mars’ position on child labor,’ accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 2-3, accessed 02/13/14
International Cocoa Initiative, Structure and Membership, accessed 03/14/14
International Cocoa Initiative, Structure and Membership, accessed 03/14/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
Mars website, ‘Mars’ position on child labor,’ accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Principles in Action 2011, p. 12, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Our Supply Chain Introduction, accessed 02/13/14
Sedex, List of Members, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 5, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 4, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 5, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 4, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 5, accessed 02/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 7, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 7, accessed 02/13/14
Mars, Supplier Code of Conduct, p. 7, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
81.25
Yes 33.33 33.33
14.58
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
50.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
27.78
- 16.67
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
11.11
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 8.33
159.0339.76
Mondelez Nestle
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Code fo Conduct, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Code fo Conduct, accessed 02/13/14; see also Mondelez, Corporate Responsiblity Expectations, acccessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Corporate Responsiblity Expectations, acccessed 02/13/14
International Cocoa Initiative, From the Field, accessed 02/13/14
International Cocoa Initiative, From the Field, accessed 02/13/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Creating Thriving Communities accessed 2/14/13
Sedex Members accessed 2/14/13
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
Mondelez, Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliers, accessed 02/13/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
http://www.kraftfoodsgroup.com/DeliciousWorld/compliance-integrity/human-trafficking-compliance.aspx accessed November 2012
http://www.kraftfoodsgroup.com/DeliciousWorld/compliance-integrity/human-trafficking-compliance.aspx accessed November 2012
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
93.75
Yes 33.33 33.33
27.08
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
0.00 33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
35.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
15.00
Yes 5.00Yes 5.00No 0.00Yes 5.00
Yes 20.00 20.00
Yes81.25
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
33.33
16.67
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
16.67
8.33
Yes 2.78
Yes 2.78Yes 2.78No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 8.33
243.3360.83
Nestle PepsiCo
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 232, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 275, accessed 02/13/14
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development accessed 2/13/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 115 and 136, accessed 02/13/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 27 and 36, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 55, accessed 02/13/14
Nestle, Creating Shared Value: Rural Development 2011, p. 118, accessed 02/13/14
Nestle, Creating Shared Value: Rural Development 2011, p. 118, accessed 02/13/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
Nestle, Creating Shared Value: Rural Development 2011, p. 139-40, accessed 02/13/14
Nestle, Our Corporate Principles, accessed 02/13/14Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 118, accessed 02/13/14
Nestle, Nestle sets out actions to address child labor…, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Performance and Challenges, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Our Corporate Principles, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, page 266, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Nestle sets out actions to address child labor…, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Creating Shared Value: Rural Development 2011, p. 114-15, 118, 127, accessed 02/14/14
Fair labor Association, Sustainable Management of Nestlé’s Cocoa Supply Chain in the Ivory Coast—Focus on Labor Standards, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Responsible Sourcing Audit Programme, accessed 02/14/14
Nestle, Performance and Challenges, accessed 02/14/14
http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Library/Documents/Suppliers/Supplier-Code-English.pdf
The Nestle Supplier Code, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
The Nestle Supplier Code, p. 2, accessed 02/14/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 139-40, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 139-40, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 139-40, accessed 02/13/14Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 222, accessed 02/13/14
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p. 140. 145, accessed 02/13/14
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
52.08
Yes 33.33 33.33
18.75
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
20.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 20.00 20.00
37.50
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
No 0.00 0.00
19.44
- 8.33
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
11.11
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 8.33
129.0332.26
PepsiCo Unilever
References Weight
100.00
33.33
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2.08
2.08
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
PepsiCo, Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing Guidelines for Supplier Relations, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo India, India Corporate Citizenship Report 2010/11: Performance with Purpose, p.54, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
20.00
5.005.005.005.00
20.00
100.00
12.50
12.50
12.50
6.25
6.25
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
12.50
100.00
33.33
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
33.33
16.67
16.67
PepsiCo, SpeakUp Usage Report, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
Sedex, List of Members, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Global Code of Conduct, p. 10, accessed 02/14/14
33.33
8.33
2.78
2.782.788.338.33
8.33
PepsiCo, Supplier Standards, accessed 02/14/14
PepsiCo, Disclosure in response to California Transparency in Supply Chains Act, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
93.75
Yes 33.33 33.33
27.08
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
-
Yes 2.08
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00 33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
30.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
- 10.00
Yes 5.00No 0.00No 0.00Yes 5.00
Yes 20.00 20.00
93.75
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
- 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
Yes 12.50 12.50
31.94
- 20.83
Yes 4.17No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
11.11
- 2.78
Yes 2.78
No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 8.33
249.4462.36
Unilever
References
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 53, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 36, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 36, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 36, accessed 02/14/14
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/customers-suppliers/suppliers/guidelines/index.aspx pg 35
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 34 and 35, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Cocoa & Sugar, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 53, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Respecting Rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Unilever, Fair Trade Ben & Jerry's, accessed 02/14/14
Sedex, List of Members, accessed 02/14/14
IUF, Global IUF/Unilever meeting explores employment & rights, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 32, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 36, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 35, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 35, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 35, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Sustainable Agriculture Code, p. 53 and footNotes, accessed 02/14/14
Unilever, Supplier Code Guidelines, accesssed 02/14/14
Women
Associated British Foods
Code Indicators Weight
WOM1 Company Awareness and Projects Relating to Women 100.00
WOM 1.1 33.33
WOM1.1.1 - access to inputs, markets, or training? 5.56
WOM1.1.2 - access to land, land use and land tenure? 5.56
WOM1.1.3 - discrimination of women farmers or workers? 5.56
WOM1.1.4 - the role of women as members of communities? 5.56
WOM1.1.5 - the role of women in food security? 5.56
WOM1.1.6 by engaging women's civil society orgs? 5.56
WOM1.2 33.33
Does the company recognize in any way the important role of women and women's empowerment in their supply chain, regarding these
specific aspects:
Does the company recognize the importance to women of crop diversification (particularly between food and cash crops) for the food
security of their families?
WOM1.3 Partnerships and Projects 33.33
WOM1.3.1 16.67
WOM1.3.2 16.67
WOM2 KNowledge and Disclosure of Company Impacts 100
WOM2.1 20
WOM2.2 20
WOM2.3 20
WOM2.4 20
WOM2.5 20
WOM3 Commitments Related to Women in the Agricultural Supply Chain 100
WOM3.1 20
WOM3.2 20
WOM3.3 20
WOM3.3.1 - water? 20.00
WOM3.3.2 - land? 20.00
WOM3.3.4 - techology? 20.00
WOM3.3.5 - finance? 20.00
Does the company have programs and/or projects that promote empowerment of rural women and girls in the supply chain? These are
projects and/or programs that were completed within the past year (2011-2012) or are ongoing.
Does the company cite the number of women impacted by their projects/ programs?
Does the company track the number of female smallholders it sources from?
Does the company track which commodities have the highest prevalence of women workers or small-scale producers in their supply chain?
Does the company report on high risk commodities where women are working?
Did the company complete public-facing studies/impact assessments in the last 5 years that measure women's impact and particular challenges
faced by women in their supply chain?
Are women workers consulted in the company's auditing process?
Has the company demonstrated that it intentionally sources from women agricultural producers? (e.g. By participating in organizations
that specifically target women's involvement in supply chains)?
Has the company declared to seek to improve the role of rural women in their supply chain?
Does the company provide public commitments to address women's lack of access to at least one of the following:
WOM3.3.6 - training? 20.00
WOM3.3.7 - markets? 20.00
WOM3.4 Has the company endorsed the UN Women's Empowerment Principles? 20
WOM 3.5 20
WOM4 Supply Chain Management 100
WOM4.1 50
WOM4.1.1 Non-discrimination and equal opportunity? 8.33
WOM4.1.2 Health and safety concerns related to women workers? 8.33
WOM4.1.3 8.33
WOM4.1.4 Maternity and paternity leave? 8.33
WOM4.1.5 8.33
WOM4.1.6 8.33
WOM4.2 Does the company disaggregate data by sex? 50
WOM4.2.1 25
WOM4.2.2 25
Total ScoreAverage score
Does the company commit to providing training and professional development to women producers and workers throughout the supply
chain?
Does the company's supplier code or supplier guidelines explicitly promote the following:
Establishing women's committees that report to management to address and resolve issues?
Women have equal access and representation to grieveance procedures?
Mandatory training on their sexual harassment and Non-discrimination policies throughout the supply chain
Does the company require in its supplier code that its suppliers track and report on the gender breakdown of their workforce?
Does the company require in its supplier code that its suppliers track and report on the gender breakdown of small-scale producers they source
from?
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
2
2
partial 2
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
359
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
http://twinings.co.uk/media/173171/two_code_of_conduct.pdf
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/improving-health-and-nutrition-with-unicef-in-assam
http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/improving-health-and-nutrition-with-unicef-in-assam
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
Twinings supplier code: http://twinings.co.uk/media/173171/two_code_of_conduct.pdf
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
55.56
22.22
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
20
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
100
Yes 20 20
Yes 20 20
20 20
No 0
No 0
No 0
Yes 20
Yes 20
Yes 20
Yes 20 20
Yes 20 20
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
18446
Coca Cola Danone
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
http://management.fortune.cnn.com/2012/10/15/coke-advancing-women-will-boost-the-bottom-line/; http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/5by20/
http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/34924-The-Coca-Cola-Company-Expands-5by20-Women-s-EcoNomic-Empowerment-Initiative-
http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/34924-The-Coca-Cola-Company-Expands-5by20-Women-s-EcoNomic-Empowerment-Initiative-; http://www.coca-
colacompany.com/our-company/supplier-guiding-principleshttp://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/Resources/
WEP_EMB_Booklet.pdf
http://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/34924-The-Coca-Cola-Company-Expands-5by20-Women-s-EcoNomic-Empowerment-Initiative-
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/5by20ProgressUpdate.pdf (page 16); http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/agriculture_and_food/
Scaling_Up_Food_Ag.pdf, p.16; http://www.coca-colacompany.com/media-center/press-releases/the-coca-cola-
foundation-anNounces-plans-for-community-ecoNomic-investments-in-myanmar; http://www.brandchannel.com/home/post/2012/06/15/Coca-Cola-Myanmar-
061512.aspx
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/5by20-Launch-AnNouncement.pdf; http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/community_case_studies.html; http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/5by20-factsheet.pdf; http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/64/20/28362d0a4ab8b51f853edcc6a765/5by20ProgressUpdate.pdf
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/in-our-company/healthy-communities/ecoNomic-opportunity.html;
http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/64/20/28362d0a4ab8b51f853edcc6a765/5by20ProgressUpdate.pdf
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/pdf/poverty_footprint_report.pdf
http://weconnectinternational.org/en/; http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/supplier_diversity.html
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/5by20-factsheet.pdf; http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/we/womens-ecoNomic-empowerment.html#section-empowering-5-million-women-by-2020
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/dynamic/press_center/2011/03/improving-lives-of-african-women-and-girls.html;
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/KOandUNW-Joint%20Global-AnNouncement-22Sept11.pdf
http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/12/8c/de25d1db46f1bd4b935a2459c13c/5by20%20Fact%20Sheet_Nov%202012.pdf
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/12/8c/de25d1db46f1bd4b935a2459c13c/5by20%20Fact%20Sheet_Nov%202012.pdf
http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/12/8c/de25d1db46f1bd4b935a2459c13c/5by20%20Fact%20Sheet_Nov%202012.pdf
http://www.unwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Women-s-Empowerment-Principles_en.pdf; http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/WEPs_CEO_Statement_of_Support_Signatories.pdf
http://assets.coca-colacompany.com/64/20/28362d0a4ab8b51f853edcc6a765/5by20ProgressUpdate.pdf
Supplier Guiding Principles: http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/1b/d5/9c8554554fd29678c97791e27c83/SGP_Brochure_ENG.pdf
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
4210
Danone General Mills
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
0 100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://ecosysteme.daNone.com/project/danfarm-egypt/; http://daNone11.daNone.com/static/2012/06/06/DaNone_annual%20report_may-
2011.pdf?JqWlO0rSr7lfkuoUtiLxpw:DRb4qfcQTHDS94g5uCIrQA:XMRxQWVmRizik6LI7hIHyA
(page 35-36);http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/sustainable_report_2011.pdf (p. 34-35); http://socialinNovator.info/ways-supporting-social-inNovation/market-
ecoNomy/social-business-partnerships/partnerships-betweeen/grameen-daNone-partnership-b;
http://socialinNovator.info/ways-supporting-social-inNovation/market-ecoNomy/social-business-partnerships/partnerships-betweeen/grameen-daNone-partnership-b;
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
http://finance.daNone.fr/phoenix.zhtml?c=95168&p=irol-govHighlights 8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
20
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
6215
General Mills Kellogg's
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://joinmyvillage.com/
http://joinmyvillage.com/
http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashx (page 25)
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
Reproduced at General Mills Corporate Social Responsibility 2011, p83, <http://content.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/2011_csr_final.ashx>
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
20
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
6215
Kellogg's Mars
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdf - Page 99
http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdf (page 99)
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 35; http://www.weconnectinternational.org/corporate-member-network; http://www.kelloggdiversityandinclusion.com/community#comm_first
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
http://www.kelloggcompany.com/content/dam/kelloggcompanyus/PDF/KelloggCompanySupplierCodeofConduct.pdf (pg.1)
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
16.67
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
17
Yes 17
No 0
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
256
Mars Mondelez
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://www.mars.com/global/press-center/case-study-detail/casestudy.aspx?SiteId=147&Id=3142
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
http://www.mars.com/global/assets/documents/433657mars_the_five_principles_of_mars_without_signatures_V2.pdf (p.11)
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0 0
17
Yes 17
No 0 0
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
40
Yes 20 20
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
8220
Mondelez Nestle
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, p.16 (http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf)
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, p.16 (http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf); Mondelez Cocoa Life Commitment (October 2012)
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, p.16 (http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf)
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, p. 16, 44 (http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf); http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mondelez-international-to-invest-400-million-to-help-one-million-people-in-cocoa-farming-
communities-179935031.html; http://blog.care.org.au/2012/08/15/ghana-is-cocoa-and-cocoa-is-ghana/
http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/SupplierDiversityGuidelines.pdf
Kraft Foods, ‘Kraft Foods Supplier Diversity Guidelines, No date,’ <http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/SupplierDiversityGuidelines.pdf> (22 May 2012); Mondelez Cocoa Life Commitment (October 2012)
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, p.40.; http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/assets/pdf/codeofconduct.pdf, p.6
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
100.00
33.33
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 33 33
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
60
No 0 0
Yes 20 20
Yes 20 20
No 0
Yes 20
No 0
No 0
Yes 20
No 0
No 0 0
Yes 20 20
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
16842
Nestle PepsiCo
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Summary Report 2011, p.6, 36, 44 33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-Report.pdf, p.107, 131; http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-30.pdf
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 NoV 2012): http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-Report.pdf, p.238; http://www.nestle.com/csv/ourpeople/diversity/Pages/Diversity.aspx
http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-Report.pdf, p.107
http://www.nestle.com/Media/NewsAndFeatures/Pages/Nestle-tells-the-United-Nations-how-it-is-improving-the-health-of-women-and-children.aspx
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 NoV 2012): http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/UN-Millenium-Development-Goals-Jan2006.pdf, p20-24
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
20
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/farmerprogrammes#.ULkhDOQ701I 20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/part_publications/pmnch2011_summ_nestle.pdf;
http://www.nestle-ea.com/en/csv/csvatear/Pages/Test.aspx
http://www.who.int/pmnch/topics/part_publications/pmnch2011_summ_nestle.pdf;
http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/UN-Millenium-Development-Goals-Jan2006.pdf,
p10
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p.107; Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 Nov 2012):
http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 NoV 2012): http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 NoV 2012): http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
Nestle Commitment on Rural Development (18 NoV 2012): http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestl%C3%A9-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-
30.pdf
http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Suppliers/Supplier-Code-English.pdf, p.4; http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-Report.pdf, p.35
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
38.89
5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
40
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
8
8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
8722
PepsiCo Unilever
Reference WeightAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
100.00
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
http://pepsicowin.com/2011/05/19/empowering-women-entrepreneurs-in-emerging-global-markets/
33.33
16.67
16.67
100
20
20
20
20
20
100
http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Responsible-Sourcing/Rural-Development.html 20
20
20
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Responsible-Sourcing/Rural-Development.html; http://www.trestlegroupfoundation.org/about-us/fact-sheet/
http://www.pepsico.com/Download/GCR_Sustainability_Report_EN_Final.pdf, p.19
20.00
20.00
20
20
100
50
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50
25
25
http://www.unwomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Women-s-Empowerment-Principles_en.pdf
http://www.pepsico.com/Download/supplier_code_of_conduct/English.pdf
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
50.00
16.67
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0 0
33
Yes 17
Yes 17
0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
20
Yes 20 20
No 0 0
No 0 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0 0
No 0 0
17
17
Yes 8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
8722
Unilever
ReferenceAll links under references were checked on February 12, 2013
http://www.oxfam.org/en/grow/pressroom/pressrelease/2012-08-15/unilever-oxfam-launch-project-enhance-women-livelihood-thailand;
http://www.unilever.com/images/es_PromotingWomensEcoNomicEmpowerment_TheLearningJourneyofHindustanUnilever_tcm13-220813.pdf
P. Polman "Now is the time for action to achieve global supply security", Financial Times, 21 November 2012 (http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/5f741430-32d6-11e2-aa83-
00144feabdc0.pdf)
P. Polman & D. Servitje, "How to feed a hungry world", Washington Post, 18 June 2012, http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentaries/159441535.html?
page=all&prepage=2&c=y#continue (27/06/2012).
P. Polman & D. Servitje, "How to feed a hungry world", Washington Post, 18 June 2012, http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentaries/159441535.html?
page=all&prepage=2&c=y#continue (27/06/2012).
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/betterlivelihoods/farmers/
P. Ekwujuru, "Unilever's CSR, women ecoNomic empowerment & devt", Vanguard, 29 August 2011, http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/08/unilever%E2%80%99s-csr-
women-ecoNomic-empowerment-devt/ (11/06/2012); http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-
Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdf (pg 26);
http://www.unilever.com/images/es_PromotingWomensEcoNomicEmpowerment_TheLearningJourneyofHindustanUnilever_tcm13-220813.pdf
P. Ekwujuru, "Unilever's CSR, women ecoNomic empowerment & devt", Vanguard, 29 August 2011, http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/08/unilever%E2%80%99s-csr-
women-ecoNomic-empowerment-devt/ (11/06/2012); http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/betterlivelihoods/supporting-small-
scale-distributors/
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/betterlivelihoods/supporting-small-scale-distributors/
http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf, p.36
http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf, pg. 8, 11, 45
Climate Change
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
CC1 Company awareness on climate change 100.00
CC1.1 16.67
Does the company recognize the need to reduce Scope 1 & 2 emissions? 8.33
8.33
CC1.2 16.67
CC1.3 16.67
CC1.4 16.67
CC1.5 16.67
CC1.5.1 5.56
CC1.5.2 Providing weather data and information? 5.56
CC1.5.3 Supporting irrigation methods and techNologies? 5.56
CC1.6 16.67
CC1.6.1 8.33
CC1.6.2 8.33
CC2 KNowledge of company impacts and disclosure 100.00
Does the company recognize the following regarding the reduction of GHG emissions:
Does the company recognize the need to reduce indirect Scope 3 emissions?
Does the company recognize the need to reduce Scope 3 agricultural emissions (purchased goods and services)?
Do the company's sustainability plans recognize the growing challenges of climate change impacts on the company and communities?
Does the company explicitly recognize the need to support small scale producers in their supply chain and local communities as they adapt to
climate change?
Does the company recognize the importance of the following in supporting small scale producers and local communities in their supply
chain:
Training for improved growing techniques, including crop diversification, soil conservation, water capture, seed varieties, etc.?
Does the company invest in projects that address climate vulnerability and resilience and that reduce agricultural emissions:
Does the company currently invest in at least one project based on an analysis of climate change vulnerability and resilience of small scale
producers in its supply chains?
Does the company directly invest in at least one project aimed at reducing agricultural emissions in its supply chain?
CC2.1 Does the company adequately report and disclose GHG emissions data? 25.00
CC2.1.1 Does the company appear on CDP's CDLI or CDPI indexes? 12.50
CC2.1.2 12.50
CC2.2 Does the company report and disclose agricultural emissions? 25.00
CC2.2.1 12.50
CC2.2.2 Is this data verified? 12.50
CC2.3 25.00
CC2.3.1 25.00
CC2.3.2 8.33
CC2.3.3 8.33
CC2.4 25.00
CC3 Commitments related to climate change 100.00CC3.1 Commitments related to GHG emissions reduction 50.00
CC3.1.1 25.00
CC3.1.1.1 Does the company set absolute targets to reduce GHG emissions? 6.25CC3.1.1.2 Does the company set intensity targets to reduce GHG emissions? 6.25
CC3.1.1.3 6.25
CC3.1.1.4 Is there board or senior executive oversight of GHG emissions reporting? 6.25
CC3.1.2 25.00
CC3.2 Commitments related to climate change resilience 50.00
CC3.2.1
CC3.2.1.1 25.00
CC3.2.1.2 25.00
CC4 100.00
Does the company publish information about the company’s response to climate change, and GHG emission performance in places other than in
the CDP response?
Does the company report and disclose Scope 3 emissions associated with purchased goods and services, including agricultural emissions?
Does the company report on supply chain risks through voluntary and mandatory reporting mechanisms?
Does the company report on climate change risks throughout its supply chain?
In the case of a US-listed company, is the company reporting on climate risks in its mandatory security filings (SEC 10-K)?
Is that reporting provided in a comprehensive and detailed manner (meaning that companies include an analysis of future climate risks on
their supply chain)?
Does the company articulate risks to small-scale producers and rural communities in their reporting of supply chain risks?
Does the company set and meet time-bound targets to reduce GHG emissions?
Has progress been reported in the past two years towards meeting those targets?
Has the company expressed a target for reduction of GHG emissions associated with agriculture (purchased goods and services)?
Does the company articulate commitments associated with company and community resilience to climate change?
Has the company adopted a climate change adaptation strategy that incorporates the needs of small-scale producers and rural communities?
Does the company have a discreet section in broader sustainability commitments on adaptation?
Supply chain management to support GHG emissions reduction and climate resilience of small scale producers and rural communities
CC4.1 Does the company's supplier code require the following: 50.00
CC4.1.1 Reduction of GHG emissions? 16.67
CC4.1.2 Reduction of GHG emissions in agricultural practices? 16.67
CC4.1.3 Building climate adaptive capacity/resilience of small scale producers? 16.67
CC4.2 Does the company provide guidelines that promote the following: 50.00CC4.2.1 Reduction of GHG emissions? 16.67
CC4.2.2 Reduction of GHG emissions in agricultural practices? 16.67
CC4.2.3 Building climate adaptive capacity/resilience of small scale producers? 16.67
Total ScoreAverage Score
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
25.00
8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
Yes 16.67 16.67
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
18.75
12.50
No 0.00
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
6.25
Partial 6.25
N/A 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
10.9410.94
10.94
Partial 1.56Partial 1.56
Partial 1.56
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
54.6913.67
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
References Weight
100.00
ABF CR Report 2010, p.49 16.67
8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
16.67
16.67
16.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
CDP 5.1 (2012 Investor Report); ABF CR Report; While ABF is a member of ETP, this is Not explicitly addressed in any company documents
While the company is a member of the Ethical Tea Partnership, there is No information regarding whether the company is directly investing in a project that
builds resilience of small scale producers
25.00
CDP Global 500 Report 12.50
ABF CR 2010 report 12.50
25.00
12.50
12.50
25.00
Illovo CDP disclosure & ABF CR 2010 report 8.33
8.33
8.33
25.00
100.0050.00
ABF CR report p. 16; Illovo CDP disclosure 25.00
Illovo CDP disclosure, section 3.1 6.25ABF 2012 CDP Investor Report, 3.1 6.25
ABF HSE 2012 6.25
Illovo CDP disclosure, section 1.1; ABF 2012 CDP Investor Report 1.1 6.25
25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
50.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
77.78
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 16.67 16.67
11.11
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
91.67
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00While TCC generally reports on climate change risk in their 10-K filings, they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events
Yes 25.00 25.00
50.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
25.00
No 0.00
Yes 25.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
219.4454.86
Coca Cola Danone
References Weight
100.00
16.67
CDP 3.1a (2012 Investor Report); CCE Sustainability Plan 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
16.67
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
16.67
5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
CDP 5.1 (2012 Investor Report); Sustainability Reports 5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report); CCE Sustainability Plan references life-cycle emissions, but Not specifically agriculture; Drink in your hand commitment
references supply chain emissions reductions
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report); 2010/11 Sustainability Report; CCE Sustainability Plan; 2020 Vision
http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Environment/climate/Business_and_Climate_Change_Adaptation.pdf ; CDP 5.1 (2012 Investor Report); Sustainability Reports
Community-Based Water Management and Adaptation to Climate Change in the Middle East through UNDP; Honduras improving watersheds program
Although company is a member of Bonsucro, which facilitates carbon reductions in sugarcane, it is Not clear the company is investing in a direct project that reduces
agricultural GHG emissions
25.00
CDP Global 500 Report (2012): "B" Score 12.50
CDP 4.1 (Annual Reports and Sustainability Reports) 12.50
25.00
12.50
12.50
25.00
CDP 5.1a-g (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
Reports on water risk and commodity risk from climate change p. 11, 19 (10-K) 8.33
While TCC generally reports on climate change risk in their 10-K filings, they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events8.33
CDP 5.1a-g (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.3a-b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
Sustainability Plans and Reports 25.00
25.00
100.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report); associated with sweeteners, beets, corn, cane and others
In the context of water stewardship, Coca-Cola does prioritize climate change impacts as one of the key drivers of long-term water availability and addresses
adaptation through source vulnerability assessments and protection plans.
50.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
The 'Carbon Challenge' is CCE's program to reduce supplier emissions (from "How can a drink build a more sustainable tomorrow?" 2011/12 Coca-Cola Sustainability
Report, p. 5); The program is Not mandatory or integrated into supplier codes
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
No 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
62.50
12.50
No 0.00
Yes 12.50
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
25.00
Yes 25.00
N/A 0.00
N/A 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
120.8330.21
Danone General Mills
References Weight
100.00
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
CDP 7.1, 13.1a (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1, 15.3a (2012 Investor Report); 2011 Sustainability Report 16.67
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 16.67
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
16.67
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011; research on DaNone Ecosystem and Livelihoods Funds; CDP 2.2-2.2a, 5.1a-d
25.00
12.50
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 15.1, 15.3a (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
CDP 15.2b (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 2.1, 2.2, 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
8.33
8.33
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.3b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
CDP 2011 Investor Report; 2011 Sustainability Report 25.00
25.00
100.00
There's an adaptation Strategy on Dairy pending for 2012, CDP 2.1a, but Not yet released
50.00
16.67
Not clear if Carbon Pact project focuses on agricultural emissions reductions 16.67
Not clear that this objective is part of carbon pact 16.67
50.0016.67
Not clear if Carbon Pact project focuses on agricultural emissions reductions 16.67
Not clear that this objective is part of carbon pact 16.67
Voluntary Carbon Pact Project with 65 suppliers, however, Not mandatory in supplier codes
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
16.67
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
29.17
12.50
No 0.00
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00While GM reports on "potential effects of climate change to raw materials", p.10 (10-K), they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
70.8317.71
General Mills Kellogg's
References Weight
100.00
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report); Global Responsibility Report 16.67
CDP 3.1b, 9.1a, 10.1a, 13.2-4 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report 16.67
16.67
16.67
5.56
2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report 5.56
2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report 5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
Only scope 3 associated with Business Travel, downstream Transport and Distribution; CDP 3.1b, 15.1 (2012 Investor Report); mention of lifecycle analysis with
farmers in Canada in 2012 Global Responsibility Report but No data
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report); 2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report
CDP 5.1d - No mention of smallholders or communities in 2012 Investor Report or Global Sustainability Report (e.g., work to map Vanilla geNome is Not specifically
related to climate change)
25.00
12.50
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
CDP 15.2 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
GM reports on "potential effects of climate change to raw materials", p.10 (10-K) 8.33
While GM reports on "potential effects of climate change to raw materials", p.10 (10-K), they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events8.33
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
25.00
50.00
2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report 25.00
2011 Sustainability Report; 2012 Global Responsibility Report 25.00
100.00
50.00
Pilot program, "supplier scorecard", Not mandatory 16.67
16.67
16.67
50.00Pilot program, "supplier scorecard", Not mandatory 16.67
Not clear that supplier code of conduct includes agricultural emissions 16.67
Not clear that supplier code of conduct includes adaptation 16.67
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
30.56
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
41.67
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00While Kellogg's references commodity price flucuation and distribution disruption due to climate change p. 1, 7 (10-K), they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
97.2224.31
Kellogg's Mars
References Weight
100.00
CDP 2.1a, 2.2a (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
2011 Corporate Sustainability Report, p.59 16.67
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report); 2011 Corporate Sustainability Report 16.67
16.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
CDP 5.1d (sustainable rice platform); http://mexicotierradeamaranto.org/principal.htm
The company's 'Sustainable Rice Platform' is highly climate relevant, but it isn't clear to what extent climate change vulnerabilities are assessed and integrated into the
program
Field to Market program and project with Louisiana Rice Farmers in reducing Methane emissions
25.00
2011 CLDI index 12.50
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor report) 12.50
CDP 15.2 (2012 Investor report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 2.1, 2.2, 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
8.33
While Kellogg's references commodity price flucuation and distribution disruption due to climate change p. 1, 7 (10-K), they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events8.33
CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report); 2011 Sustainability report 25.00
100.0050.00
25.00
CDP 3.1c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report 6.25
CDP 3.3b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
Kellogg's references commodity price flucuation and distribution disruption due to climate change p. 1, 7 (10-K)
50.00
16.67
Voluntary program: CDP 2.1a, 6.1d - Fieldprint calculator (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
Voluntary program: CDP 2.1a, 6.1d - Fieldprint calculator (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
80.56
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
25.00
0.00
No 0.00
N/A 0.00
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
N/A 0.00
N/A 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
18.7518.75
18.75
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
124.3131.08
Mars Mondelez
References Weight
100.00
p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 2011 16.67
p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
16.67
p.37, Principles in Action 2011 16.67
16.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
p. 12, Principles in Action Summary 2011; discussion that majority of GHG emissions come from agriculture and Mars is developing targets
p.8, 10, Principles in Action Summary 2011: recognizes the impact of climate change on producers and products
Mars website, ‘Our Supply Chain Approach: Selecting and Monitoring Suppliers’, 2011
While some projects are climate-related (eg, sustainable agriculture), it is Not clear that they include an assessment of climate change impacts and vulnerabilities
Mars-supported research has identified ways to reduce GHG emissions from rice through improved management. Also looking at this with other crops. PiA p.12
25.00
Mars does Not report to CDP 12.50
12.50
25.00
p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 12.50
12.50
25.00
8.33
SEC 10-K 8.33
8.33
PiA 2011 & web research; while the PiA certainly makes Note of impacts to producers, this is Not referred to comprehensively in the context of risks throughout their supply chain25.00
100.0050.00
p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 25.00
p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 6.25p. 10, Principles in Action Summary 6.25
p. 59, Principles in Action Summary 6.25
We could Not find information on this in Mars' reports 6.25
website & PiA refer to need to reduce agriculture emissions but No targets identified 25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
http://www.mars.com/global/assets/images/center-content/LRQA_assurance_statement.pdf
PiA 2011 & web research; while the company takes a lifecycle approach to GHG emissions reductions, it's Not clear that they also do that from a climate change
impacts perspective
50.00
Review of supplier codes 16.67
Review of supplier codes 16.67
Review of supplier codes 16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
33.33
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
No 0.00 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
45.83
12.50
No 0.00
Yes 12.50
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
104.1726.04
Mondelez Nestle
References Weight
100.00
16.67
CDP 3.1b-c (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
2010/2011 "Creating a more Delicious World"; CDP 5.1a-h 16.67
CDP 2.2a; CDP 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
16.67
CDP 2.2a, 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
5.56
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
No, Kraft has a commitment to invest in sustainable agriculture but it's Not clear to what extent this integrates an analysis of climate impacts an vulnerabilities
Although company is a member of Bonsucro, which facilitates carbon reductions in sugarcane, it is Not clear the company is investing in a direct project that reduces
agricultural GHG emissions
25.00
12.50
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
CDP 15.2 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 2.1, 2.2, 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
SEC 10-K 8.33
SEC 10-K 8.33
CDP 2.1, 2.2, 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
3.3b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
50.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
No reference in Code; 4C project on coffee purchased through Farmer Connect is Not incorporated into Kraft's codes
No reference in Code; 4C project on coffee purchased through Farmer Connect is Not incorporated into Kraft's codes
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
100.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
Yes 5.56
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
75.00
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
N/A 0.00
N/A 0.00
Yes 25.00 25.00
75.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
50.00
Yes 25.00
Yes 25.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
250.0062.50
Nestle PepsiCo
References Weight
100.00
16.67
8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
16.67
CDP 2.2/2.2a/5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) & Creating Shared Value Report 16.67
16.67
CDP 2.2a/5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
CDP 3.1a-d (it should be assumed that they recognize need to reduce Scope 1&2 emissions in future)
http://www.nestle.com/csv/Environment/lifecycleapproach/Pages/lifecycleApproach.aspx; There is a reference in the Creating Shared Value Report
(p.130) on the need to report more comprehensive Scope 3 emissions but No direct mention of agriculture emissions
Creating Shared Value Report 2011 (food security, food price volatility, climate change)
The NESCAFE plan working to distribute high-yielding, disease resistent coffee plants to coffee farmers
Project with Chinese milk farmers: http://www.nestle.com/csv/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/
Pages/Nestl%C3%A9-creates-market-Chinese-milk-farmers.aspx
25.00
CDP Global 500 Report (2012): highest ranking 12.50
CDP 4.1; Creating Shared Value Report 2011 12.50
25.00
12.50
CDP 15.2 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 5.1a-g (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
8.33
8.33
CDP 5.1a-g (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1d (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1/a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.3b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
25.00
http://www.nestle.com/csv/environment/climatechange/climatechangeadaptation 25.00
100.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) Nestle does Not track this data or make it public; Nestle did make this information available in 2011, however, it is Not clear why
disclosure did Not continue into the following year
Nestle Commitment on Climate Change, adaptation commitments; Creating Shared Value Report 2011
50.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
All all of the below, Nestle just generally refers to an environmental commitment in their code and provides No language specific to these climate priorities
No reference in Code. Their pilot project: RISE sustainability evaluation, SM3.5 is Not mandatory.
No reference in Code; 4C project on coffee purchased through Farmer Connect is Not incorporated into Nestle's codes
No reference in Code; 4C project on coffee purchased through Farmer Connect is Not incorporated into Nestle's codes
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
63.89
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
No 0.00 0.00
Yes 16.67 16.67
5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
41.67
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00 While the reporting is more detailed than some companies, they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
130.5632.64
PepsiCo Unilever
References Weight
100.00
CDP 2.1a (2012 Investor Report); Performance with Purpose 2012 16.67
CDP 7.1-4, 8.1-8 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 8.33
16.67
16.67
CDP 2.2-2.2a, 5.1a-d (2012 Investor Report) 16.67
16.67
CDP 2.2a, 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
5.56
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report) 5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
100.00
While PepsiCo is Not reporting on comprehensive agricultural emissions, they do refer to the importance of lifecycle emissions for ag products in sustainability
materials (eg, GHG emissions from oranges for use in Tropicana); Performance with Purpose 2012
The company speaks about the need to identify climate risks, but in the primary sustainability plans/materials the issue of climate impacts on communities is Not
well-articulated
PepsiCo has implemented weather insurance with potato farmers in India partnering with ICICI Lombard
While PepsiCo has many climate-relevant projects on sustainable agriculture and water, it is Not clear that these projects are designed in response to a vulnerability
assessment associated with climate change impacts
Rice seeding in India: http://www.saiplatform.org/projects/57/98/Saving-Water-by-Direct-Seeding-of-Rice-in-India
25.00
CDP Global 500 Report (2012) 12.50
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
CDP 15.2b (2012 Investor Report) 12.50
25.00
CDP 2.1a (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
SEC 10-K, p.21 8.33
While the reporting is more detailed than some companies, they do Not explicitly address future climate risks or past weather events8.33
CDP 5.1a-g (2012 Investor Report); brief mention of providing support to farmers, but Not integrated into articulation of risks 25.00
100.0050.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report) 6.25
CDP 3.3b (2012 Investor Report) 25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
50.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
50.0016.67
16.67
16.67
PepsiCo has a pilot program called "strategic supplier engagement strategy" which focuses on reducing GHGs; Continued roll out of Environmental Supplier Outreach (ESO) program focused on embedding conservation targets with 50 suppliers, SM 3.2; GHG emissions recorded for 89 NA/EU suppliers in 2010, 148 in 2011, SM 3.5.
However, None of this is mandatory or embedded in supplier codes.
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
75.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
Yes 16.67 16.67
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
62.50
25.00
Yes 12.50
Yes 12.50
12.50
Yes 12.50
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
N/A 0.00
N/A 0.00
No 0.00 0.00
25.0025.00
25.00
Yes 6.25Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
Yes 6.25
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
50.00
16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
33.33Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
212.5053.13
Unilever
References
CDP 2.2a (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 7.1 (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 15.1 (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 15.1; http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/greenhousegases/carbon/
Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report, p.18
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report); review of sustainable living plan and agricultural materials
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report); review of sustainable living plan and agricultural materials
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report); review of sustainable living plan and agricultural materials
While some of Unilever's sustainability projects are climate-related, it is Not clear that they incorporate an analysis of long-term climate impacts and vulnerabilities of
small scale producers
CDP Global 500 Report (2012) "A" band
CDP 4.1 (2012 Investor Report)
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/greenhousegases/carbon/
CDP 15.2a-b
CDP 5.1d (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 3.1a-c (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 3.1a (2012 Investor Report)CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 1.1-1.1a (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 3.1b (2012 Investor Report)
CDP 5.1d; "Sustainable Agriculture Code", voluntary and No mention of smallholders
SAC, p.25-6
SAC, p.25-6
SAC
SAC
Water
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
WAT1 Awareness and projects related to access to and use of water 100.0
WAT1.1 25.0
WAT1.1.1 - recognize the finite nature of water resources? 12.5
WAT1.1.2 12.5
WAT1.2 25.0
WAT1.2.1 8.3
WAT1.2.2 - aiming to reduce water use through increased efficiency? 8.3
WAT1.2.3 8.3
WAT1.3 25.0
- 3 commodities 25.0
Does the company recognize the food security implications of access to water? Does it:
- recognize that agricultural practices or processing can cause water contamination?
Does the company ackNowledge its responsibilities to water use and access to water through:
- ackNowledgement that its operations depend on sustainable water use?
- awareness of the impact of its own operations on surrounding communities?
Does the company conduct projects in different commodities working with suppliers addressing access to and use of water in the supply
chain?
(Projects must focus on one of the following issues: improving access to or reducing agricultural use of water. It must also include the
participation or collaboration of a local community organization).
- 2 commodities 16.7
- 1 commodity 8.3
- 0 commodities 0.0
WAT1.4 25.0
8.3
- Water Footprint Network 8.3
- CDP Global Water Disclosure 8.3
WAT2 KNowledge of company impacts and disclosure 100.0
WAT2.1 16.7
WAT2.2 16.7
WAT2.3 16.7
WAT2.4 16.7
WAT2.5 16.7
WAT2.6 16.7
WAT3 Commitments related to water 100.0
WAT3.1 20.0
WAT3.2 20.0
WAT3.3 20.0
WAT3.4 20.0
WAT3.5 20.0
WAT4 Supply chain management 100.0
Does the company commit to at least two of the following water initiatives?
- UN CEO water mandate
Does the company provide and disclose data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within its operations?
Is the company able to identify, and does it disclose, discharges of water from its operations by destination, by treatment method and by quality
using standard effluent parameters ?
Has the company identified and disclosed water-stressed regions (by country or region within a country) where it has operations and the
percentage of operations in that area?
Does the company disclose the following: (a) regions (by country or region within a country) subject to water related risk (besides water
stress) where it has operations, (b) the relevant risk indicator, and (c) percentage of its total operations in that area?
Have surrounding communities of relevant geographies been consulted on the basis of assessments above (WAT 2.3 and 2.4) on water-stress
and risk?
Has the company identified key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) that come from regions subject to water related risk?
Does the company formally recognize the human right to water as defined by the United Nations Committee on EcoNomic, Social and
Cultural Rights and General Assembly?
Does the company require to fair compensation and grievance mechanisms in case water rights have been violated and/or
relinquished?
Has the company set a specific target to reduce its water use in its direct operations?
Has the company set a specific target to reduce its water use along its whole value chain?
Does the company commit to consulting local communities on plans to develop water resources?
WAT4.1 50.0
12.5
- prevent pollution and safeguard water quality? 12.5
12.5
- consult local communities on impacts of water resource usage? 12.5
WAT4.2 50.0
Total scoreAverage Score
Does the company have a clause on water in its supplier code or sourcing guidelines that require suppliers to:
- adopt specific practices to improve water management (such as measuring progress, irrigation management, techniques on crop
processing, etc.) ?
- take additional measures in water stressed areas to mitigate impacts of water use?
Does the company require its key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management ?
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
29.2
12.5
Yes 12.5
No 0.0
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
0.0 0.0
No
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
33.3
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0 0.0
62.515.6
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
References Weight
100.0
25.0
Illovo Sugar Annual Report, 2011 p. 42, 59 & 84 12.5
12.5
25.0
ABF CR Report 2010, p.7, p.11, p.14, p.25 8.3
8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
p.14 - http://www.abf.co.uk/file.axd?pointerid=82c66aa0a5c443d9b2e193a45e664a24
p.7, p.11, p.14, p.25 - http://www.abf.co.uk/file.axd?pointerid=82c66aa0a5c443d9b2e193a45e664a24
http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/our-environmental-commitments
Illovo pgs. 42-43; 57; 61; 84 - http://www.illovosugar.co.za/Libraries/2012_Annual_Report/2012_Illovo_Integrated
_Annual_Report.sflb.ashx
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
8.3
8.3
100.0
16.7
16.7
ABF CR Report 2010 p.20 - http://abf.co.uk/assets/html/pdf-files/abf-cr-10.pdf 16.7
p.20 - http://abf.co.uk/assets/html/pdf-files/abf-cr-10.pdf 16.7
16.7
16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
Illovo Annual Report, 2011 p.85 - http://www.illovosugar.co.za/Libraries/2012_Annual_Report/2012_Illovo_Integrated
_Annual_Report.sflb.ashx
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
50.0
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
91.7
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
16.7 16.7
Yes
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
33.3
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
40.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0 0.0
165.041.3
Coca Cola Danone
References Weight
100.0
25.0
12.5
12.5
25.0
The Coca-Cola Company, Form 10-K 2011 (2012), p. 11, 33. 8.3
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012’ p. 5. 8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
The Coca-Cola Company, Form 10-K 2011 (2012), p. 11, 33; The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012" pg2
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012’ p. 51, 41,45;
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012’ pg 12-14
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
8.3
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section Section 7.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure, Section 8.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure, Section 2.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure, Section 2.2 16.7
16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.5 16.7
100.0
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012’ p. 14 20.0
20.0
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012" pg5 20.0
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1c 20.0
20.0
100.0
http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/sa_case_studies.html; http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/in-our-company/
healthy-communities/sustainable-agriculture.html; http://www.saiplatform.org/projects/10/98/Sustainable-Sugarcane-Irrigation-and-
Safe-Drinking-Water-Access-to-Sugarcane-Farmers-in-Guangxi-China; http://www.saiplatform.org/projects/69/98/Project-Unnati-Sustainable-Mango-
Production-India
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners; The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012" pg 32
The Coca-Cola Company, “The Water Stewardship and Replenish Report 2012" - last paragraph - page 14 (in adobe reader)
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 3.3 50.0
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
54.2
12.5
No 0.0
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
0.0 0.0
Yes
25.0
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
Yes 8.3
83.3
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
Yes 16.7
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
50.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 50.0 50.0
207.551.9
Danone General Mills
References Weight
100.0
25.0
12.5
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, pg11 12.5
25.0
8.3
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, pg39 8.3
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, pg37 & 162; 2011 CDP - Section 1.2 &3.4a 8.3
25.0
25.0
http://www.daNone.com/en/axes-strategiques/water.html
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
8.3
CDP Water Disclosure 2011 & 2012 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 7.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 8.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 2.1 16.7
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 2.2 16.7
16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 2.5 16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 1.1c; DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, pg66
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 3.3 50.0
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011, p81 ; DaNone Sustainability Report 2009, pg 61-69
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
62.5
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
8.3 8.3
Yes
12.5
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 8.3
50.0
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
50.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 50.0 50.0
182.545.6
General Mills Kellogg's
References Weight
100.0
25.0
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012, p59. 12.5
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012, pg 44 12.5
25.0
General Mills Corporate Social Responsibility 2012, p45 8.3
General Mills Corporate Social Responsibility 2012, p45, 59 8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
8.3
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section Section 7.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section Section 8.1 16.7
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.2 16.7
16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure section 2.5 16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/sustainability/GM_water.ashx
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012, pg43; 2011 CDP Water Disclosure section 1.1c
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - Section 3.3 50.0
http://www.generalmills.com/Responsibility/ethics_and_integrity/Supplier_code_of_conduct.aspx/
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
54.2
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
0.0 0.0
Yes
12.5
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 8.3
66.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0 0.0
140.835.2
Kellogg's Mars
References Weight
100.0
25.0
12.5
12.5
25.0
8.3
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p. 54, 64 8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
Kellogg Company 2010 Annual Report, p.1 and Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p.2
http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/working-with-growers/engaging-with-louisiana-rice-farmers
Kellogg Company 2010 Annual Report, p.1 and Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, p.2 , 54, 59
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners 8.3
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section Section 7.1a 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section Section 8.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.2 16.7
16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure section 2.5 16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report, pg 57; 2011 CDP Water Disclosure 1.1c
Kellogg Company Supplier Code of Conduct 50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - 3.3 50.0
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
41.7
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
0.0 0.0
Yes
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0 0.0
78.319.6
Mars Mondelez
References Weight
100.0
25.0
Principles in Action Summary 2010, p.13. 12.5
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/rice.aspx 12.5
25.0
8.3
8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-operations/water-impact.aspx
Mars principles in action 2011 pg 11- http://mars.com/global/assets/documents/Mars_PIA_Highlights_2011_EN_report.pd
f
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
8.3
8.3
8.3
100.0
16.7
Principles in Action Summary 2011, p 74 16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
Principles in Action Summary 2011, p 26. 20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
https://www.cdproject.net/CDPResults/CDP-Water-Disclosure-Global-Report-2012.pdf
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-operations/water-impact.aspx
Supplier Code of Conduct, April 2012 50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
50.0
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
41.7
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
0.0 0.0
Yes
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
0.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0 0.0
61.715.4
Mondelez Nestle
References Weight
100.0
25.0
Kraft Foods Delicious World Report 2010 - pg 20 12.5
12.5
25.0
Kraft Foods Delicious World Report 2011 - pg 4 8.3
8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/sustainability/ag_supply_chain.aspx
Kraft Foods Delicious World Report 2010 - pg 31; http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionImages/ImageRepository/
news/mmr05112011/2011.05%20FACT%20Goals%20Ag%20Sustainability%20Release%20FINAL.pdf
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
8.3
2011 CDP Water Disclosure Not found on CDP website 8.3
100.0
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
Kraft Foods "Delicious World Report" 2010 pg 21; "Creating a More Delicious World" 2011 report, p. 5
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
50.0
http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/compliance-integrity/corporate_responsibility_expectations.aspx
http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/compliance-integrity/corporate_responsibility_expectations.aspx
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
91.7
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
25.0 25.0
Yes
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
83.3
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
Yes 16.7
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
87.5
37.5
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
No 0.0
Yes 50.0 50.0
282.570.6
Nestle PepsiCo
References Weight
100.0
25.0
CP-Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p.149 12.5
AD- RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture pg 4 12.5
25.0
AD- RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture 8.3
AD- RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture 8.3
CP-Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 , p.164 8.3
25.0
25.0
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/sourcingoverview/Combatingdeforestation/Pages/Combatingdeforestation.aspx;
http://www.nestle.com/csv/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Cocoa-Propagation-Project.aspx;
http://www.nestle.com/CSV/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Drip-irrigation-project-Nicaragua.aspx;
http://www.nestle.com/csv/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Improving-water-use-coffee-production-Mexico.aspx;
http://www.nespresso.com/ecolaboration//medias_dyn/articles/1798/article/attachment-2.pdf
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/ 8.3
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners 8.3
Disclosed information through CDP in 2011 & 2012 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 7.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 8.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.1 16.7
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.2 16.7
16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.5 16.7
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1c 20.0
20.0
100.0
CP-Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 , p.174; 2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.2
CP-Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 , p.182; 2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1c
50.0
RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture - pg3 12.5
RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture - pg4 12.5
RSG specific requirements for water use in agriculture - pg5 12.5
12.5
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 3.3 50.0
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
75.0
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
16.7
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
No 0.0
8.3 8.3
Yes
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
60.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
50.0
0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 50.0 50.0
201.750.4
PepsiCo Unilever
References Weight
100.0
25.0
12.5
PepsiCo Sustainable Agriculture Brochure pg 3 12.5
25.0
PepsiCo Water Stewardship Report, pg 1 8.3
8.3
8.3
25.0
25.0
http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Water.html
http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Water.html (accessed 29 May 2012)
16.7
8.3
0.0
25.0
8.3
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners 8.3
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure 8.3
100.0
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 7.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 8.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.1 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.2 16.7
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - sections 2.1 and 2.2 16.7
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.5 16.7
100.0
PepsiCo Water Stewardship Report, pg 2-3 20.0
20.0
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1c 20.0
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1c 20.0
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 1.1a 20.0
100.0
http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/replenishing-water.html; http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/replenishing-water.html
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/
50.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 3.3 50.0
PepsiCo Supplier Code of Conduct (March 1, 2009); PepsiCo Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing Guidelines for Supplier Relations (2009)
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
83.3
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
8.3 8.3
Yes
25.0
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
Yes 8.3
66.7
Yes 16.7
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
Yes 16.7
No 0.0
Yes 16.7
20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 20.0
No 0.0
No 0.0
75.0
25.0
Yes 12.5
Yes 12.5
No 0.0
No 0.0
Yes 50.0 50.0
245.061.3
Unilever
References
CP-Unilever and Sustainable Agriculture - Water (2009), pp. 34
CP- Unilever and Sustainable Agriculture (2009), pg 9
CP-Unilever and Sustainable Agriculture - Water (2009), pp. 3; http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/water/agriculture/index.aspx
CP- Unilever and Sustainable Agriculture - Water (2009), pp. 9 , http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/water/why/index.aspx (19/06/2012).
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/water/reducingwateruseinmanufacturing/
http://ceowatermandate.org/about/endorsing-companies/
http://www.waterfootprint.org/?page=files/OverviewPartners
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 7.1
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 8.1
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.1
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.2
2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 2.5
2011 CDP Water Disclosure 1.1c
2011 CDP Water Disclosure 1.1c
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/casestudies/agriculture/IndiaAmoragherkinssupportsustainablelivelihoods.aspx
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure; http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/water/why/index.aspx
2011 CDP Water Disclosure - section 3.2; http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/water/reducingwateruseinmanufacturing/
Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Code - pg17-18
Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Code - pg18
2011 & 2012 CDP Water Disclosure - section 3.3
Land
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
LA1 100.0LA1.1 16.67
LA1.1.1 5.56
LA1.1.2 5.56
LA1.1.3 5.56
LA1.2 16.67
LA1.2.1 8.33
LA1.2.2 Does the company refer to FPIC for Indigenous peoples? 8.33
LA1.3 16.67
LA1.4 16.67
LA1.4.1 Recognizing the need to conserve biodiversity? 4.17
LA1.4.2 Recognizing the need for responsible management of pesticide use? 4.17
Company analysis relating to landDoes the company recognise the land rights of local
communities?
Does the company recognize the importance of communities’ right to access and control of land, ackNowledging access to land for food
security?
Does the company recognize the importance of communities’ right to land for cultural, spiritual and ceremonial land?
Does this recognition include specific reference the complexity of land tenure rights (informal, traditional and customary land rights)?
Does the company recognise community Consent to (proposed) investments
Does the company refer to Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) for affected communities?
Does the company refer to fair compensation and grievance mechanisms in case land rights have been
violated and/or relinquished?
Does the company recognize that agricultural land needs to be managed sustainably by:
LA1.4.3 4.17
LA1.4.4 Recognizing deforestation as a problem? 4.17
LA1.5 16.67
LA1.5.1 8.33
LA1.5.2 8.33
LA1.6 16.67
LA2 KNowledge of company impacts 100
LA2.1 33.33
LA2.2 33.33
LA2.2.1 16.67
LA2.2.2 16.67
LA2.3 33.33
LA2.3.1 11.11
Recognizing the need for effective soil management to avoid soil erosion, land degradation and desertification?
Does the company have an analysis and vision about the implications of biofuels for food security in the developing
world?
Does the company refer to the implications of biofuels for food security in the developing world?
Does the company publically advocate against the use of agricultural land for fuel rather than food?
Does the company have at least one example where they have actively engaged with suppliers addressing land rights issues in the supply chain (incl. with MSIs)? For example, has the company been participating in
the establishment of dispute settlement mechanisms in a roundtable like RSPO?
Has the company identified countries it sources from where (i) land tenure security canNot be assured, or (ii)
poor land governance is of particular concern?
Has the company identified countries or commodities with environmental issues where it sources from?
Has the company identified countries it sources from where environmental degradation is a particular issue?
Has the company identified commodities that are related to (i) deforestation problems, and (ii) land use change/conversion? (Can
include HCVAs, peatlands, etc)
Does the company understand the social and/or environmental impact of land use changes
Does the company require that impacts of land use changes and/or impacts of intended land acquisitions be included in all social and
environmental impact assessments?
LA2.3.2 11.11
LA2.3.3 11.11
LA3 Commitments related to land 100
LA3.1 50.00
LA3.1.1 10.00
LA3.1.2 Does the company commit to FPIC for all affected communities? 10.00LA3.1.3 Does the company commit to FPIC for indigeNous peoples only? 10.00
LA3.1.4 10.00
LA3.1.5 10.00
LA3.2 50.00
LA3.2.1 Palm oil 16.67
100% commitment RSPO End 2015 10%
LA3.2.2 Soy 16.67
Membership RTRS 10%
LA3.2.3 Sugarcane 16.67
No Commitment 0
LA4 Supply chain management and partnerships with suppliers 100
LA4.1 50.00
LA4.1.1 Are land rights respected, including customary land rights? 8.33
LA4.1.2 Are all agricultural activities subjected to FPIC for all land rights users? 8.33
Does the company have examples of social impact assessments of land use change and/or impact production operations on local communities?
(Especially those referencing human rights violations/impacts and/or impacts to local livelihoods or food security)
Does the company have examples of environmental impact assessment of land use change and/or impact production operations on soil and
biodiversity?
Is the company committed to social and environmental land security for impacted communities?
Has the company committed to ensuring land tenure security for impacted communities?
Does the company declare and implement zero tolerance for land grabbing in company operations, whether such operations are directly
or indirectly contracted by the company?
Does the company have a clear/ quantified commitment to stop deforestation with a deadline?
Does the company make public commitments relating to sustainable production standards:
Is the company's supplier code explicit about the following social issues related to land:
LA4.1.3 8.33
LA4.1.4 8.33
LA4.1.5 8.33
LA4.1.6 Does the company have a stop land grab clause in their supplier code? 8.33
LA4.2 50.00
LA4.2.1 Does it refer to the conservation of biodiversity? 10.00
LA4.2.2 Does it refer to the responsible management of pesticides use? 10.00
LA4.2.3 Does it conform to international standards on safe pesticides use? 10.00
LA4.2.4 Does it refer to effective soil management? 10.00
LA4.2.5 Does it refer to redress in case of environmental damage done? 10.00
Total scoreAverage Score
Are the supplier codes for at least 2 commodities subjected to FPIC for all land rights users?
Does the company avoid the transfer of land rights (including land under customary tenure) away from small-scale food producers, and instead
engage smallholders by proposing fair contracts?
Does the company provide fair compensation in case land rights have been relinquished?
Is the company's supplier code explicit about the following environmental issues related to land:
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
4.2- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 4
Yes 4.17
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
3.3
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 3.33
Yes 1.67
No 2
No 0
10.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 10.00
Partial 2.50
Partial 2.50
Partial 2.50
Partial 2.50
No 0
34.28.5
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
Illovo Annual Report 2011, http://www.illovosugar.co.za/Libraries/2012_Annual_Report/2012_Illovo_Integrated_Annual_Report.sflb.ashxp (p.85) Dec 2012
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
CSR report 2010 http://www.abf.co.uk/documents/pdfs/2010/2010_corporate_responsibility_report.pdf Dec 2012
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
0%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
CSR report 2010http://www.abf.co.uk/documents/pdfs/2010/2010_corporate_responsibility_report.pdfDec 2012
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
ABF Supplier codehttp://www.pgpint.com/about-us/supplier-code-of-conductDec 2012
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
12.5- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 13
Yes 4.17
No 0
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
1.7
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 1.67
No 0.00
No 0
Yes 2
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
30.87.7
Coca Cola Danone
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
The Coca-Cola Company, “PlantBottle Frequently Asked Questions,’ 2012, <http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/plantbottle_faq.html> (5 July 2012).
The Coca-Cola Company, “Reasons to believe - 2010/2011 Sustainability Report’ 4.17
The Coca-Cola Company, “Reasons to believe - 2010/2011 Sustainability Report’ 4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Exploring the links between international business and poverty reduction, by Oxfam America, The Coca Cola Company and SABMillehttp://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/citizenship/pdf/poverty_footprint_report.pdfDec 2012
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
60%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
Bonsucro_membershttp://bonsucro.org/members.htmlDec 2012
Supplier Guiding Principles: http://d1lwft0f0qzya1.cloudfront.net/1b/d5/9c8554554fd29678c97791e27c83/
SGP_Brochure_ENG.pdf
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
12.5- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 13
Yes 4.17
No 0
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
20.0
- 10
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
Yes 10
- 10.00
Yes 10.00
No 0
No 0
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
49.212.3
Danone General Mills
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
Sustainability report 2011 - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/sustainable_report_2011.pdfDec 2012
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Sustainability report 2011 - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/sustainable_report_2011.pdfDec 2012
DaNone, APP and DaNone, 2012http://www.daNone.com/en/our-vision/app-daNone.html(6 July 2012)
DaNone forest footprint policy - http://www.daNone.com/en/Nos-politiques/positions/our-policies-positions.html
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
50%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
DaNone, APP and DaNone, 2012, http://www.daNone.com/en/our-vision/app-daNone.html (6 July 2012)
RSPO, http://www.rspo.org/news_details.php?nid=78> DaNone sustainability report 2010, p. 51
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
25.0- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.3
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0
No 0
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
50.012.5
General Mills Kellogg's
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
General Mills Global Responsibility Report http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxpg. 54, Dec 2012
General Mills global responsibility report, 2012 http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxpg. 2, Dec 2012
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
General Mills global responsibility report, 2012 http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxpg. 42, Dec 2012
General Mills Global Responsibility Report, http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxDec 2012
2012 Sustainability reporthttp://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012.ashxp 59Dec 2012
General Mills Global Responsibility report 2012 http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxpg 54, Dec 2012
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
70%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
General Mills Statement on Responsible Palm Oil Sourcing, 22 September, 2010. http://www.generalmills.com/Home/Responsibility/Sourcing/palm_oil_statement.aspxDec 2012
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
12.5- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 4
No 0.00
No 0
No 0
Yes 4
- 8
No 0
Yes 8
No 0
0.00
No 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
11.7
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 11.67
Yes 11.67
No 0
No 0
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
24.26.0
Kellogg's Mars
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
2010 CSR Report http://www.kelloggcompany.com/content/dam/kelloggcompanyus/corporate_responsibility/pdf/pastCR/Kelloggs_CR_Report_2010.pdfp 29, Dec 2012
http://www.agriculture.com/news/policy/lawmakers-request-rfs-drawdown_4-ar25593
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
50%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
Kellogg website, http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/promoting-change-industrywide/promoting-sustainable-palm-oil-production
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
16.7- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
8.3
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0
No 0
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
41.710.4
Mars Mondelez
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
Mars Principles in Action Summary 2011 - http://www.mars.com/germany/en/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdf p.14, Dec 2012
Mars Principles in Action Summary 2011 - http://www.mars.com/germany/en/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdf p.14, Dec 2012
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Mars Principles in Action Summary 2011 - http://www.mars.com/germany/en/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdf p.14, Dec 2012
Mars Principles in Action Summary 2011 - http://www.mars.com/germany/en/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdf p.14, Dec 2012
Mars Principles in Action, “third party verification” - 2011 - http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-approach-to-business/third-party-certification.aspxDec 2012
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
50%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
Mars Palm Oil Statement, January 2012 - http://www.rspo.org/sites/default/files/ACOP2012_CGM_4-0127-10-000-00-25.pdfDec 2012
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
25.0- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
10.0
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 10.00
Yes 8.33
No 0
Yes 2
0.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0
51.712.9
Mondelez Nestle
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/sustainability/ag_supply_chain.aspxDec 2012
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf
4.17
4.17
16.67
http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Business/Kraft-calls-for-biofuels-policy-overhaul 8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’; Kraft Foods, ‘Sustainability Goals and Agriculture Fact Sheet’
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
50%
16.67
10%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_resp
onsibility_report.pdf
http://www.flo-cert.net/flo-cert/index.php?id=29> (12 July 2012)
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
50.0- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 8
Yes 8
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 17
Yes 8
Yes 8
No 0
33.33
No 0.00
- 33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
20.0
- 10
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
Yes 10
- 10.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 2
No 0
28.3
- 8
No 0
No 0
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 20.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0
131.732.9
Nestle PepsiCo
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
Nestle Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Forest Based Materials, October 2012-http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Media/Statements/2012-October/Nestl%C3%A9%20Responsible%20Sourcing%20Guidelines%20for%20Forest-based%20Materials%20October%202012.pdf
Nestle Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Forest Based Materials, October 2012-http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Media/Statements/2012-October/Nestl%C3%A9%20Responsible%20Sourcing%20Guidelines%20for%20Forest-based%20Materials%20October%202012.pdf
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
4.17
4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2012/08/20/nestle-chairman-urges-politicians-to-end-use-of-food-in-producing-biofuels/August 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
16.67
50%
16.67
0%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/sourcingoverview/Combatingdeforestation/Pages/Combatingdeforestation.aspx
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
Nestlé, Commitments on Deforestation and Forest stewardship, December 2011,http://www.Nestlé.com/Common/NestléDocuments/Documents/Media/
Statements/2011
Nestlé_Commitments_on_Deforestation_Forest_Stewardship.pdf (2 July 2012) & Nestlé website, ‘Soybean Popularisation Project – Nigeria’, March
2011, <http://www.Nestlé.com/csv/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/
Pages/Soybean-Popularisation-Project-Nigeria.aspx> (2 July 2012)
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Nestle Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Forest Based Materials - http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Creating%20Shared
%20Value/Nestl%C3%A9%20Responsible%20Sourcing%20Guidelines%20for%20Forest-based%20Materials%20October%202012.pdf
2010 Nestlé Supplier Codehttp://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Suppliers/supplier-code-english.pdf
Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability, 2010 - http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Library/Documents/Environmental_Sustainability/Policy-Environmental-Sustainability.pdf; Nestle Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Forest Based Materials
Nestle Responsible Sourcing Guidelines for Forest Based Materials - http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Nestl%C3%A9%20Responsible%20Sourcing%20Guidelines%20for%20Forest-based%20Materials%20October%202012.pdf; Nestlé Policy on Environmental Sustainability, 2010 - http://www.nestle.com/Common/NestleDocuments/Documents/Library/Documents/Environmental_Sustainability/Policy-Environmental-Sustainability.pdf
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
25.0- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 8
Yes 8
No 0
No 0
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
10.0
- 0
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
No 0
- 10.00
Yes 8.33
No 0
Yes 2
20.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 20.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0
71.717.9
PepsiCo Unilever
References Weight
100.016.67
5.56
5.56
5.56
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
16.67
4.17
4.17
PepsiCo, “Environmental Sustainability, Agriculture” - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
PepsiCo, “Environmental Sustainability, Agriculture” - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
4.17
PepsiCo, “2010 Sustainability Report” 4.17
16.67
8.33
8.33
16.67
100
33.33
33.33
16.67
16.67
33.33
11.11
Sustainable Agric Practices http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_agri_0531_final.pdf
Sustainable Agric Practices http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_agri_0531_final.pdf and, 2010
Sustainability report
RSPO, 2010http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo%20RSPO.pdf
11.11
11.11
100
50.00
10.00
10.0010.00
10.00
10.00
50.00
PepsiCo, “2010 Sustainability Report” 16.67
50%
16.67
25%
16.67
0
100
50.00
8.33
8.33
Bonsucro website, “Bonsucro membership list,’ 12 June 2012, <http://www.bonsucro.com/list_of_members.html> (29 June 2012)
Sustainable Agric Practices http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_agri_0531_final.pdf and, 2010 Sustainability report
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Sustainable Agric Practices http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_agri_0531_final.pdf and, 2010
Sustainability report
Sustainable Agric Practices http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_agri_0531_final.pdf and, 2010
Sustainability report
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
55.6- 6
Yes 6
No 0
No 0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4
Yes 4
Yes 4
- 17
Yes 8
Yes 8
Yes 17
16.67
No 0.00
- 16.67
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
- 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
26.7
- 10
No 0
No 0No 0
No 0
Yes 10
- 16.67
Yes 8.33
Yes 4
Yes 4
40.0
- 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
No 0
- 40.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
No 0
138.934.7
Unilever
References
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6cd499bc-2cbc-11e2-a95d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2KrDXELQY, 21.12.2012 and http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf(p32)
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/biodiversity/
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/why/
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/why/
Unilever website, Sustainable living, „Combating deforestation‟, http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/greenhousegases/deforestation/index.aspx
Unilever to Source All Agricultural Materials Sustainably‟, Feed Info News Service, 29 June 2011, http://www.feedinfo.com/console/PageViewer.aspx?page=2312943&public=Yes (19/06/2012).
Unilever to Source All Agricultural Materials Sustainably‟, Feed Info News Service, 29 June 2011, http://www.feedinfo.com/console/PageViewer.aspx?
page=2312943&public=Yes (19/06/2012)
Unilever helped set up the RSPO Dispute resolution facility. ANother example of engagement is wrt Malaysia's IOI corp: http://us.mobile.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUSL3E7F80XZ20110408
Sustainable living, „Combating deforestation‟, http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/greenhousegases/deforestation/
index.aspx
Unilever website, Sustainable living, „Combating deforestation‟, http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/greenhousegases/deforestation/
index.aspx
Unilever website, Sustainable living, Sustainable sourcing, Palm oil, „RSPO‟ http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/palmoil/rspo/
Unilever‟s next step in sustainable sourcing of raw materials‟, Unilever press release, 8 June 2012, http://www.unilever.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2011/Unileversnextstepinsustainablesourcingofrawmaterials.aspx
Bonsucro website, „Members‟, http://www.bonsucro.com/members.htmlDec 2012
Unilever Agricultural Code http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Unilever Agricultural Code http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Unilever Agricultural Code http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Unilever Agricultural Code http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Unilever Agricultural Code http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Farmers
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
F1 Awareness and projects relating to farmers 100.00
F1.1 9.09
F1.2 9.09
F1.3 9.09
F1.4 9.09
F1.5 9.09
F1.6 9.09
F1.7 9.09
Does the company recognize the key role small scale producers play in food security in their communities and how their supply chain can
impact this?
Does the company recognize the impact of food price volatility on small-scale producers and on food security in the developing world?
Does the company recognize that small-scale producers need training and support?
Does the company recognize that farmers organizations can play a key role in supporting small-scale producers?
Does the company recognize the importance of stable and long term business commitments for small-scale producers?
Does the company recognize the importance for small-scale agriculture of crop diversification, adaptation of crop varieties or integrated pest
management?
Does the company recognize the importance of fair and transparent contract arrangements with small-scale producers that include
mechanisms for fair sharing of risks?
F1.8 9.09
F1.9 9.09
F1.10 9.09
example project in commodity 1 3.03
example project in commodity 2 3.03
example project in commodity 3 3.03
F1.11 9.09
ETP 4.55
4C 4.55
WCF 4.55
Sustainable Food Lab 4.55
SAI 4.55
Does the company recognize that fair prices need to be paid to small-scale producers in order for small-scale producers to obtain a decent
income?
Does the company recognize that its supply chain needs to deal with small-scale producers in a way that gives the producers market options
(through not actively displacing other buyers who are sourcing from small-scale producers supplying the company or by Not locking-in
farmers to supplying to them exclusively in return for the provision of inputs or services)?
Does the company have projects in different commodities and regions working with suppliers addressing smallholder issues in the supply
chain?
Does the company participate in at least sectoral or multi-stakeholder initiatives which address small-holder issues? This may also include
initiatives like ETI, 4C, WCF, Sustainable Food Lab, SAI, etc. Full score for 2 or more initiatives, half a score for one initiative.
Sustainable Rice Platform 4.55
F2 KNowledge and Disclosure 100.00
F2.1 50.00
F2.1.1 25.00
F2.1.2 25.00
F2.1.2.1 8.33
F2.1.2.2 8.33
F2.1.2.3 8.33
F2.2 50.00
F2.2.1 Does the company have such an impact assessment for one commodity? 25.00
F2.2.2 25.00
F3 Commitments 100.00F3.1 50.00
F3.1.1 10.00
F3.1.2 10.00
Does the company demonstrate that it kNows how many small-scale producers there are in its supply chain?
Does the company disclose the total number of small-scale producers in its supply chain?
Does the company disclose the total number of small-scale producers in its supply chain for specific commodities?
Does the company provide the total number of small-scale producers in one commodity supply chain where they source from small-scale
producers?
Does the company provide the total number of small-scale producers in a second commodity supply chain where they source from small-scale
producers?
Does the company provide the total number of small-scale producers in a third (or more) commodity supply chain where they source from small-
scale producers?
Does the company conduct impact assessments on small-scale farmers related to how sourcing practices that
impact small-scale producers? Assessments should include reference to decent and stable income and may include reference to productivity, quality of products and other
topics.
Does the company have such an impact assessment for a second commodity?
Commitments related to small-scale producers in its supply chain
Has the company committed to ensuring that small-scale producers in its supply chain are paid a fair price that allows these producers to earn a
decent income?
Has the company demonstrated it supports small-scale producers in its supply chain earn a decent income?
F3.1.3 10.00
F3.1.4 10.00
F3.1.5 10.00
F3.1.5.1 Has the company set up such a target for two or more commodities? 5.00
F3.1.5.2 Has the company set up such a target for one commodity? 5.00
F3.2 50.00
F3.2.1 12.50
commitment sustainable cocoa (% score) 0.00
F3.2.2 NA
commitment sustainable coffee (% score) NA
Has the company committed to ensuring that dealings with small-scale producers in its supply chain are fair and transparent (including fair and transparent terms of trade, quality requirements, pricing structure and
access to dispute respolution mechanisms)?
Has the company demonstrated that it supports making dealings with small-scale producers in its supply chain fair and transparent (by
supporting mechanisms that ensure fair and transparent terms of trade, quality requirements, pricing structure or access to dispute respolution
mechanisms)?
Has the company set up a target to increase support to small scale producers for which small scale producers represent a substantial part of production? Training and support must relate to improving productivity,
revenue, risk management or access to services.
Commitments to responsible production standards relevant for small scale producers. The top 4 commodities by %
commitment are considered.
Cocoa -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO, UTZ, RA
Coffee -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO, UTZ, RA, 4C
F3.2.3 12.50
commitment sustainable tea (% score) 0.20
F3.2.4 NA
commitment sustainable tropical fruits (% score) NA
F3.2.5 12.50
commitment sustainable rice (% score) 0.00
F3.2.6 NA
commitment sustainable potatoes (% score) NA
F3.2.7 12.50
commitment sustainable sugar cane (% score) 0.00
F4 Supply chain management 100.00
F4.1 50.00
F4.1.1 - monitoring local market opportunities for smallholders? 10.00
F4.1.2 - providing information on crop profit margins for smallholders? 10.00
F4.1.3 - understanding opportunities for farmers to improve profit margins? 10.00
F4.1.4 10.00
Tea -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO, UTZ, RA
Tropical Fruits -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO,RA
Rice -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO , membership in new rice
initiative
Potatoes -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? RA
Sugar Cane -- is there a public commitment to sustainable production standards relevant for smallholders? FLO
Does the company have a clause on smallholders in its supplier code that promotes improved conditions for smallholders related to fair business arrangements
through:
- training farmers on soil management, agro-chemical use or other technical issues?
F4.1.5 10.00
F4.2 50.00
F4.2.1 25.00
F4.2.2 25.00
Total scoreAverage Score
- training farmers to strengthen their ability to negotiate, aggregate product, avoid moNopolistic traders, and diversify their products and
markets?
Does the company have a clause on farmers organizations and complaints mechanisms in its supplier code?
Does the company's supplier code require suppliers to work with farmer organizations to generate opportunities for money saving, improving
yields, improving quality or other support?
Does the company's supplier code provide farmers access to complaint and dispute resolution mechanisms?
Associated British Foods
Answers Sub-score Score
56.06
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 6.06
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
No 0.00
No 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
17.5015.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 5.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.00
2.50
No 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 2.50
NA 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
6.25
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
6.25
Partial 6.25
No 0.00
79.8119.95
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
ABF CSR Report 2010http://www.abf.co.uk/file.axd?pointerid=82c66aa0a5c443d9b2e193a45e664a24Dec 2012
Illovo sustainability Annual Reporthttp://www.illovosugar.co.za/files/2012%20IAS%20-%20Sustainability.pdfDec 2012
Twinings CSR 2012http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/ethical-teaDec 2012
ABF CSR Report & Illovo sustainability Annual Report 2011http://www.abf.co.uk/documents/pdfs/2011/2011_annual_report.pdfDec 2012
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Twinings CSR 2012http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/fairtrade-organic-english-breakfastDec 2012
Illovo sustainability Annual Reporthttp://www.illovosugar.co.za/files/2012%20IAS%20-%20Sustainability.pdfDec 2012
ETP 2011http://www.ethicalteapartnership.org/our-work/strategic-sustainability/smallholder-training-indonesia/Dec 2012
ETP 2011http://www.ethicalteapartnership.org/our-partners/tea-company-members/Dec 2012
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00Twinings Ethical Teahttp://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/ethical-teaDec 2012
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.00
http://www.abf.co.uk/responsibility/suppliers/improving_standards_in_our_supply_chainDec 2012
12.50
0.10
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
RFA “Change is Brewing in the Tea Industry” http://www.rainforestalliance.org/publications/newsletter/change-brewing-tea-industryDec 2012Twinings CSR 2012http://twinings.co.uk/about-twinings/social-and-environmental-responsibility/ethical-teaDec 2012
Twinings Ovaltine Code of Conducthttp://twiningsindia.com/CodeConduct.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
Illovo Annual report 2011 & ABF annual reports http://www.ethicalteapartnership.org/our-work/strategic-sustainability/smallholder-training-indonesia/Dec 2012
Coca Cola
Answers Sub-score Score
50.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
No 4.55
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
25.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
21.2520.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
1.25
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 1.25
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
10.00
10.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
106.2526.56
Coca Cola Danone
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#Dec 2012
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#Dec 2012Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: Kenya and Uganda; Project Nurture Mango and Passion Fruit, August 2012; Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: India: Project Unnati, July 2012 - http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#section-piloting-sustainable-farming-projects-worldwide
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12 and “Project Nurture”http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#Dec 2012
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#Dec 2012
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12 Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: India: Project Unnati, July 2012http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#section-piloting-sustainable-farming-projects-worldwide Dec 2012
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/in-our-company/healthy-communities/ecoNomic-opportunity.html#Haiti%20Hope;Dec 2012
Coca Cola Sustainability Report 2011/12http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/in-our-company/healthy-communities/ecoNomic-opportunity.html#Haiti%20Hope;Dec 2012
SAI 2010, “Project Nurture”http://www.saiplatform.org/projects/70/98/Project-Nurture-Sustainable-Mango-Production-in-East-AfricaDec 2012
SAI membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/membersDec 2012
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
GIZ, Growing Business with Smallholders, Nov 2012http://www.agribusiness-with-smallholders.net/fileadmin/user_upload/publications/Guide-Growing_Business_with_Smallholders_small.pdfDec 2012
USAID Annual Letter, 2011http://50.usaid.gov/haiti-hope-a-partnership-project-focused-on-mangos/Dec 2012
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.00
12.50
NA
Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: Kenya and Uganda; Project Nurture Mango and Passion Fruit, August 2012; Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: India: Project Unnati, July 2012 http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#section-piloting-sustainable-farming-projects-worldwideDec 2012
Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: Kenya and Uganda; Project Nurture Mango and Passion Fruit, August 2012; Factsheet Sustainable Agriculture: India: Project Unnati, July 2012 http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#section-piloting-sustainable-farming-projects-worldwideDec 2012
NA
NA
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
http://www.honesttea.com/community/sustainability/missionreport/pdfs/2011_Mission_Report.pdf
Coca-Cola Supplier Guiding Principles 2011http://assets.coca-colacompany.com/1b/d5/9c8554554fd29678c97791e27c83/SGP_Brochure_ENG.pdfDec 2012
Coca-Cola Supplier Guiding Principles 2011http://assets.coca-colacompany.com/1b/d5/9c8554554fd29678c97791e27c83/SGP_Brochure_ENG.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
Danone
Answers Sub-score Score
40.91
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
No 4.55
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
NA 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.005.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.00
0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
45.9111.48
Danone General Mills
References Weight
CP 100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
Sustainability Report 2011 http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/95/95168/DaNone_Sustainability_Report_2011.pdfDec 2012
DaNone Annual report 2011
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Sustainability Report 2011 http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/95/95168/DaNone_Sustainability_Report_2011.pdfDec 2012
DaNone communities “La laiterie du berger”:http://www.daNonecommunities.com/en/project/la-laiterie-du-berger?mode=mesuresDaNoneDec 2012
DaNone “Ukraine Milk Communities phase 2”:http://ecosysteme.daNone.com/project/ukraine-milk-communities/Dec 2012
DaNone “Strawberries communities”http://ecosysteme.daNone.com/project/fruit-sourcing-in-ukraine/Dec 2012
SAI membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/membersDec 2012
SAI membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/membersDec 2012
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
NA
NA
Sustainability Report 2011 - FaRMS Program -http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/IROL/95/95168/DaNone_Sustainability_Report_2011.pdfDec 2012
NA
NA
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
DaNone business conduct policy and purchasing code of ethicshttp://www.daNoneproveedores.com/des_pdp_por/resources/Purchasing%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20of%20the%20DANoNE%20GROUP%20_V2.Nov%2007_.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
General Mills
Answers Sub-score Score
45.45
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
10.0010.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
55.4513.86
General Mills Kellogg's
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
General Mills CSR report 2012http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxDec 2012
General Mills CSR report 2012http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR/csr_2012_rev2.ashxDec 2012
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Partners in Food Solution http://www.partnersinfoodsolutions.com/Projects.aspx
General Mills, Commitment, Corn -http://www.generalmills.cn/gmi/Level2Page.aspx?PageNumber=284Dec 2012
Partners in Food Solution, “why we do what we do”http://www.partnersinfoodsolutions.com/Results.aspxDec 2012
WCF membershttp://worldcocoafoundation.org/about-wcf/members/
SAI Membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00General Mills Corporate Social Responsibility 2009 - http://generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR_report_archives/2009_csr.ashx General Mills: Environmental Sustainability: Sustainable Agriculture - http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/sustainability/GM_agriculture.ashx
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.10
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
GeneralMills Supplier Code of Conduct:http://www.generalmills.com/en/Responsibility/ethics_and_integrity/Supplier_code_of_conduct.aspx?p=1Dec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
Kellogg's
Answers Sub-score Score
30.30
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
3.03
Yes 3.03
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
6.255.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.00
1.25
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 1.25
No 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
36.559.14
Kellogg's Mars
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
Kellogg Corporate responsibility report, 2011http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdfDec 2012 & Kellogg Corporate Responsibility, sustainable agriculture, 2012 - http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/supporting-community-developmentDec 2012
Kellogg Corporate responsibility report, 2011http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdfDec 2012
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Kellogg Corporate Responsibility, sustainable agriculture, 2012 - http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/supporting-community-developmentDec 2012
SAI membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/membersDec 2012
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
Kellogg Corporate Responsibility, sustainable agriculture, 2012http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/promoting-change-industrywideDec 2012
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.70
12.50
0.90
Kellogg Corporate Responsibility, sustainable agriculture 2012http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/promoting-change-industrywideDec 2012
12.50
0.90
NA
NA
12.50
0.10
NA
NA
NA
0.10
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Kellogg Company Supplier Code of Conducthttp://procurementdocs.kelloggcompany.com/content/dam/procurement/Kellogg%20Company%20Supplier%20Code%20of%20Conduct.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
Mars
Answers Sub-score Score
72.73
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
Yes
Yes 4.55
50.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
50.00
Yes 25.00
Yes 25.00
62.5030.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
32.50
Yes 8.75
Yes 11.25
Yes 11.25
NA 0.00
Yes 1.25
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
185.2346.31
Mars Mondelez
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
Mars, ‘our supply chain, cocoa - http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/cocoa.aspx
IDH, Cocoa Productivity and Quality Program Facility (CPQP), 2012 http://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/CPQPDec 2012Mars iMPACT:http://hespa.net/sites/hespa.net/files/mars-gtz-impact-en.pdfDec 2012
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
IDH, Cocoa Productivity and Quality Program Facility (CPQP), 2012 http://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/CPQPDec 2012
Mars, Cocoa Productivity and Quality Program Facility, (CPQP):http://cocoasustainability.com/2012/04/idh-and-mars-chocolate-ink-contract-for-inNovative-cocoa-productivity-and-quality-program/ & iMPACT: http://hespa.net/sites/hespa.net/files/mars-gtz-impact-en.pdf
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Mars, Cocoa Certification,http://www.mars.com/global/brands/cocoa-sustainability/cocoa-sustainability-approach/certification.aspxDec 2012
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
Agriculture Business Week website, ‘Cacao: The Resurrection Crop for Farmers in the Philippines’, http://www.agribusinessweek.com/cacao-the-resurrection-crop-for-farmers-in-the-philippines (7 June 2012)
Mars website, ‘Our Supply Chain: Tea and Coffee,’ 2012, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/tea-and-coffee.aspx(4 July 2012).
Mars, our supply chain, Tea and Coffee,http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/tea-and-coffee.aspx
WCF, our members,http://worldcocoafoundation.org/about-wcf/members/
http://www.sustainablefoodlab.org/membership/membership-directory
SAI, our members, http://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
IRRI, ‘Sustainable rice platform workshop held in the Philippines’, 2011http://irri.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=12008:sustainable-rice-platform-workshop-held-in-the-philippines&lang=enDec 2012
Mars, ‘InNovative pilot programs for sustainable coffee sourcing’, Oct 2012http://www.mars.com/global/press-center/case-study-detail/casestudy.aspx?SiteId=147&Id=3676
GIZ, Development partnership with the private sector in Ghana and Cotê d’Ivoire, http://www.giz.de/themen/en/32796.htm
Mars Commitments Cocoa Sustainability,http://www.mars.com/italy/en/commitments/sustainability/cocoa-sustainability.aspx
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.20
12.50
0.30
Mars Commitments Cocoa Sustainability,http://www.mars.com/italy/en/commitments/sustainability/cocoa-sustainability.aspx
Mars, our supply chain, cocoa, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/cocoa.aspx
Mars, cocoa certification,http://www.mars.com/global/brands/cocoa-sustainability/cocoa-sustainability-approach/certification.aspx
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
12.50
0.10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.50
0.20
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
Principles in Action Summary 2010 - http://www.mars.com/germany/de/assets/documents/PIA-Summary.pdfDec 2012
Mars supplier code of conduct, 2009 http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/supplier-relationships.aspxDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
Mondelez
Answers Sub-score Score
72.73
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
33.33
8.33
No 0.00
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
40.0030.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
10.00
Yes 2.50
Yes 3.75
Yes 1.25
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 2.50
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
146.0636.52
Mondelez Nestle
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
www.kraftfoodscompany.com/.../Kraft%20Foods%20Ghana%20visit%20press%20release%20011010.doc
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
Kraft Foods, ‘Sustainability Goals and Agriculture Fact Sheet’ May 2011, http://www.mondelezinternational.com/SiteCollectionImages/ImageRepository/news/mmr05112011/2011.05%20FACT%20Goals%20Ag%20Sustainability%20Release%20FINAL.pdfDev 2012
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
Roberts Environmental Center, ‘2011 Sustainability Reporting of the World’s Largest Food and Beverage Companies, 2012 http://www.roberts.cmc.edu/PSI/PDF/Food2011.pdf (22 May 2012).
4C Coffee Association, ‘our members’http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/about-us/our-members/trade-industry.htmlDec 2012
WCF membershttp://worldcocoafoundation.org/about-wcf/members/
SAI membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
Mondelez International, ‘Coffee Made Happy’ -http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/sustainability/coffeemadehappy.aspxDec 2012
BCtA, Business Call to Action, ‘Cadbury Cocoa Partnership’, 2012 http://www.businesscalltoaction.org/members/2010/08/the-cadbury-cocoa-partnership/Dec 2012
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.20
12.50
0.20
www.kraftfoodscompany.com/.../Kraft%20Foods%20Ghana%20visit%20press%20release%20011010.doc
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
Mondelez International, news centre, Nov 2012 - http://www.mondelezinternational.com/MediaCenter/country-press-releases/us/2012/Pages/multi_media_11162012.aspxDec 2012
Mondelez International, Financial News Release, Oct 2012 - http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=129070&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1750986Dec 2012
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
Mondelez International, ‘Coffee Made Happy’ -http://www.mondelezinternational.com/DeliciousWorld/sustainability/coffeemadehappy.aspxDec 2012
NA
NA
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
12.50
0.10
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’ - http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_deliciousworld.pdfDec 2012
Corporate Responsibility Expectations for Direct Suppliershttp://www.mondelezinternational.com/deliciousworld/compliance-integrity/corporate_responsibility_expectations.aspxDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/4c-voices/sustainable-coffee-project-indonesia.html?PHPSESSID=d1ucusvrnvgsjk5n3ipekf51i7
Nestle
Answers Sub-score Score
81.82
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
No 0.00
75.00
50.00
Yes 25.00
25.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
36.2530.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
6.25
Yes 2.50
Yes 2.50
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 1.25
0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
193.0748.27
http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/4c-voices/sustainable-coffee-project-indonesia.html?PHPSESSID=d1ucusvrnvgsjk5n3ipekf51i7
Nestle PepsiCo
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, coffee and cocoa - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Global Platform on Business and Biodiversity, Competitive advantage: Nestlé’s Nespresso Sustainable quality programme for coffee, Jul 2009 - http://www.cbd.int/en/business/case-studies/competitive-advantage-nestle%E2%80%99s-nespresso-sustainab
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
Nestlé Commitment on Rural Development, Nov 2012http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Creating%20Shared%20Value/Rural_development/Nestlé-Commitment-on-Rural-Development-12-11-30.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, ‘Creating Shared Value Case Studies’, CSV, Sri Lanka, Sep 2012http://www.nestle.com/CSV/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Nestl%C3%A9-initiated-milk-collection-district-Sri-Lanka.aspx Dec 2012
Nestlè, CSV, ‘Soybean Popularisation Project in Nigeria’, Sep 2012http://www.nestle.com/csv/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Soybean-Popularisation-Project-Nigeria.aspxDec 2012
Nestlè, CSV, ‘Supporting sustainable coffee production in Nicaragua’, Sep 2012http://www.nestle.com/CSV/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Supporting-sustainable-coffee-production-Nicaragua.aspxDec 2012
WCF, our members,http://worldcocoafoundation.org/about-wcf/members/;
http://www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/about-us/our-members/trade-industry.html
SAI, our members, http://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members;
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/farmerprogrammes
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/farmerprogrammes
http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/farmerprogrammes
Fair Labor Association (FLA), impact assessment study, Jun 2012http://www.fairlabor.org/sites/default/files/documents/reports/cocoa-report-final_0.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, CSV, rural development (coffee), Mar 2012http://www.nestle.com/csv/ruraldevelopment/coffee/Pages/coffee.aspxDec 2012
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.00
NA
NA
Just Food, Oct 2012 - http://www.just-food.com/news/nestles-two-fingered-kit-kat-goes-fairtrade_id120944.aspxDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Social_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdfDec 2012
NA
NA
12.50
0.20
12.50
0.00
12.50
0.10
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/press_office/press_releases_and_statements/archive_2009/december_2009/
kit_kat_gives_cocoa_farmers_in_cte_divoire_a_break.aspx
Nestle supplier code, Aug 2010 - http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Suppliers/supplier-code-english.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
PepsiCo
Answers Sub-score Score
45.45
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
25.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
28.7525.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
5.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.00
3.75
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 2.50
No 0.00
Yes 1.25
NA 0.00
35.00
10.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
134.2033.55
PepsiCo Unilever
References Weight
100.00
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
9.09
PepsiCo, “India Corporate Citizenship Report 2010/11. Performance with Purpose. The Promise of PepsiCo,” - http://pepsicoindia.co.in/Download/print-media/Pepsi%20Citizenship%20Report-%202010-11.pdf PepsiCo, “Global Sustainable Agriculture Policy" Jan 2009 -http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PEP_Global_SAG_Policy_FINAL_Jan_2009.pdfDec 2012
PepsiCo, “Global Sustainable Agriculture Policy", Jan 2009 - http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PEP_Global_SAG_Policy_FINAL_Jan_2009.pdfDec 2012
Environmental Sustainability, Agriculture - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
9.09
9.09
9.09
3.03
3.03
3.03
9.09
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
PepsiCo, Environmental Sustainability, ‘Partnership with Farmers’- http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/partnership-with-farmers.html
SAI, members projects -http://www.saiplatform.org/projects/63/98/Creating-Sustainable-Corn-Initiative-in-Developing-Communities
USAID, Ethiopia, Sep 2012http://ethiopia.usaid.gov/Node/301
Sustainable Food Laboratory, membership - http://www.sustainablefoodlab.org/membership/membership-directory
SAI, our members -http://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members
4.55
100.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
25.00
25.00
100.0050.00
10.00
10.00
PepsiCo, Environmental Sustainability, ‘Partnership with Farmers’- http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/partnership-with-farmers.html
PepsiCo, Environmental Sustainability, ‘Partnership with Farmers’- http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/partnership-with-farmers.html
10.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
50.00
12.50
0.70
NA
0.20
"Performance with Purpose. Sustainability Report. PepsiCo Greater China," http://www.pepsico.com.cn/downloads/pdfs/kechixuReportEnglish.pdf PepsiCo, “India Corporate Citizenship Report 2010/11. Performance with Purpose. The Promise of PepsiCo," - http://pepsicoindia.co.in/Download/print-media/Pepsi%20Citizenship%20Report-%202010-11.pdf
PepsiCo, Environmental Sustainability, ‘Partnership with Farmers’- http://pepsicoindia.co.in/purpose/environmental-sustainability/partnership-with-farmers.html
12.50
0.90
12.50
0.80
NA
NA
12.50
0.80
NA
NA
100.00
50.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
CP-PepsiCo, “Environmental Sustainability, Water”, http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
Environmental Sustainability, Agriculture - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
PepsiCo supplier code of conduct - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Responsible-Sourcing/Supplier-Code-of-Conduct.html PepsiCo, “Global Sustainable Agriculture Policy", Jan 2009 - http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PEP_Global_SAG_Policy_FINAL_Jan_2009.pdfDec 2012
PepsiCo, “Global Sustainable Agriculture Policy", Jan 2009 - http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PEP_Global_SAG_Policy_FINAL_Jan_2009.pdfDec 2012
10.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
PepsiCo, “Global Sustainable Agriculture Policy", Jan 2009 - http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PEP_Global_SAG_Policy_FINAL_Jan_2009.pdfDec 2012
Unilever
Answers Sub-score Score
72.73
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 9.09
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 3.03
Yes 9.09
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
83.33
33.33
Yes 25.00
8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
50.00
Yes 25.00
Yes 25.00
70.0030.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
Yes 10.00
10.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
40.00
Yes 8.75
Yes 0.00
Yes 11.25
Yes 10.00
NA 0.00
Yes 10.00
NA 0.00
65.00
40.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
Yes 10.00
No 0.00
25.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
291.0672.77
Unilever
References
Unilever Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdfDec 2012
Unilever, helping smallholder farmers - http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/betterlivelihoods/farmers/index.aspx http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/agriculturalsourcingpartnerships/
The Sustainable Source - Issue 1, Unilever publication, Winter 2011, http://www.unilever.com/images/The%20Sustainable%20Source_Issue%201_Unilever_tcm13-280687.pdfUnilever Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdf
Sustainable Agriculture Code, 2010 -http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf(Dec 2012)
Unilever Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdfDec 2012
Unilever and Sustainable Agriculture - Water, Unilever publication, 2009 -http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_and_Sustainable_Agriculture%20-%20Water_tcm13-179363.pdf(Dec 2012)
Datamonitor, ‘Unilever and Oxfam to work on five-year project in Azerbaijan’, 2011 -http://www.datamonitor.com/store/News/unilever_and_oxfam_to_work_on_five_year_project_in_azerbaijan?productid=D46E5866-B4B3-40C0-BA2D-8CDCB029F8C6
Unilever, Sustainable sourcing (Tea),http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/tea/
Unilever, sustainable living, ‘Farmer development programme’http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/casestudies/better-livelihoods/farmer-development-program.aspx http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/cocoa-sugar/
Sustainable Food Laboratory, membership - http://www.sustainablefoodlab.org/membership/membership-directorySAI, our members,http://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members
SAI, our membershttp://www.saiplatform.org/about-us/members;
Sustainable Food Laboratory, membership - http://www.sustainablefoodlab.org/membership/membership-directory;
Better Livelihoods, More on Helping Smallholder Farmers,http://www.unilever.co.uk/sustainable-living/betterlivelihoods/index.aspx#28-
284863
Unilever, Sustainable sourcing (Tea),http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/tea/
Unilever, sustainable living, farmer development programme in Indonesiahttp://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/casestudies/better-livelihoods/farmer-development-programme.aspx
www.icra-edu.org/objects/.../Tea_Booklet[1].pdf
SAI & IDG, Impact assessment lipton tea supply chain, 2007http://www.saiplatform.org/uploads/Modules/Library/unilever-tea-a_revitalizing-liptons-supply-chain.pdfDec 2012
Unilever Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdfDec 2012
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf& IDH Learning Program, Part II: Reaching out to smallholders,http://www.idhsustainabletrade.com/thee-learning(Dec 2012)
Unilever, Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdfDec 2012
Unilever, Sustainable Living Plan Progress Report 2011,http://www.unilever.com/images/uslp-Unilever_Sustainable_Living_Plan_Progress_Report_2011_tcm13-284779.pdfDec 2012
Unilever, sustainable sourcing, cocoa and sugar,http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/cocoa-sugar/index.aspx
Unilever, sustainable sourcing, Fair Trade Ben & Jerry’shttp://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/fairtrade/
Unilever, Sustainable sourcing (Tea),http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/tea/
Unilever, sustainable sourcing, fruit-vegetables,http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/fruit-vegetables/
Unilever, sustainable sourcing, fruit-vegetables,http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/fruit-vegetables/
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdfDec 2012
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf
Sustainable Agriculture Code, SAC 2010, http://www.unilever.com/images/sd_Unilever_Sustainable_Agriculture_Code_2010_tcm13-216557.pdf
Unilever, sustainable living, farmer development programme in Indonesiahttp://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/casestudies/better-livelihoods/farmer-development-programme.aspx
Transparency
Associated British Foods
Code Weight
T1 Corporate reporting 100.00
T1.1 GRI-compliance 50.00
GRI-compliance % of score 0.25T1.2 Lobbying reporting 50.00
T1.2.1 16.67
T1.2.2 16.67
T1.2.3 16.67
T2 Disclosure of total volumes 100.00
T2.1 33.33
palm oil 4.17
sugar cane 4.17
soy 4.17
cocoa 4.17
tropical fruits (bananas, pineapples, oranges and mangoes) 4.17rice 4.17
maize 4.17
dairy 4.17
Does the company disclose lobbying information by the European transparency register?
Does the company disclose information about the membership of (trade) associations/federations/confederations in Europe?(according to the
European Transparency Register)
Does the company disclose information about the membership of (trade) associations/federations/confederations in the US ?
Does the company disclose total volumes sourced for the following 8 commodities: palm oil, sugar cane, soy, cocoa, tropical fruits, maize, rice, and dairy? This can also be presented as percentage of global
supply.
T2.2 33.33
coffee 8.33
tea 8.33
wheat 8.33potatoes NA
tomatoes 8.33
water NA
T2.3 33.33
palm oil 8.33
soy 8.33
sugar cane 8.33
cocoa NA
coffee NA
tea 8.33
rice NAfruits (bananas, pineapples, oranges and mangoes) NA
potatoes NA
T3 Disclosure of buying agents and sourcing countries 100.00
T3.1 50.00
T3.1.1 8.33
T3.1.2 Does the company disclose the name of at least one top soy supplier? 8.33
Does the company disclose total volumes sourced for the following 6 commodities: coffee, tea, wheat, potatoes, tomatoes and water where applicable? This can also be presented as percentage of global supply.
Does the company disclose the sourcing volumes of sustainable production for palm oil, soy, sugarcane, cocoa, coffee, tea, rice, fruits,
and potatoes where applicable? Reference can be made in volumes (MT) or in percentages of total volumes.
Does the company disclose the names of at least one top supplier for palm oil, soy, sugarcane, cocoa and 2 other important commodities for
their sourcing
Does the company disclose the name of at least one top palmoil supplier?
T3.1.3 8.33
T3.1.4 8.33
T3.1.5 8.33
T3.1.6 8.33
Disclosure of sourcing origin 50.00
T3.2
palm oil 4.17
sugar cane 4.17
soy 4.17
cocoa 4.17
coffee 4.17
tea 4.17
tropical fruits (bananas, pineapples, oranges and mangoes) 4.17
rice 4.17
maize 4.17
wheat 4.17
potatoes NA
Does the company disclose the name of at least one top sugar cane supplier?
Does the company disclose the name of at least one top cocoa supplier?
Does the company disclose the name of at least one of its suppliers for first ‘other important commodity’?
Does the company disclose the name of at least one of its suppliers for second ‘other important commodity’?
Does the company disclose source of origin (at least two countries if applicable from Non-OEDC countries, but including Mexico) for sourced
commodities (where applicable for the 14 key commodities)?
tomatoes 4.17
dairy 4.17
NA
T4 Is the company transparent about its system of audits? 100.00
T4.1 25.00
T4.2 25.00
T4.3 Does the company disclose how it deals with Non-compliance findings? 25.00
T4.4 25.00
Total scoreAverage score
water (as a commodity for drinking water or soft drinks producing companies)
Does it provide information on what social and environmental topics are included in the audits?
Does it provide information on how the suppliers are audited? Including information about first, second, third tiers, and about independent third
party auditing.
Does the company provide information about the percentage of first tier suppliers compliant with the company supplier code or sourcing policy?
does the company provide information about the amount of audits revealing major breaches within the company supplier code?
Associated British Foods
Answers Subscore Score
12.50
Partial 12.50
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
25.00
8.33
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00NA 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
16.67
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 8.33
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
33.33
25.00
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
8.33
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
50.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
Yes 25.00
No 0.00
120.8330.21
Associated British Foods Coca Cola
Reference Weight
100.00
Illovo Sugar Annual Report, 2011 50.00
0.5050.00
16.67
16.67
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm 16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
2011/2012 Annual communications of progress reports by Consumer Goods Manufacturers (RSPO secretariat, October 22, 2012) http://www.rspo.org/en/acop_2011-2012_reports
Associated British Foods, Long term investment / sustainable growth; Annual report & http://www.abf.co.uk/media/news/2012/2012-annual-results-anNouncement
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.565.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
11.11
NA
11.11
NA
NA
11.11
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
http://www.rspo.org/file/ACOP2012-OM_CGM%20Submitters(5).pdf
Rainforest Alliance website, Newsletters, 'change is brewing in the tea industry ', < http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/publications/newsletter/change-brewing-tea-
industry>
http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/413812/jordans_cereals_switches_to_sustainable_palm_oil.html
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
http://www.allied-mills.co.uk/english/index.php
http://www.abf-grocery-grads.com/who-are-we/the-jordan-and-ryvita-company.aspx
http://www.twinings.com/int/l2c_around_the_world.php
3.57
3.57
3.57
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
ABF: Measuring Our Sustainability, CSR report 2010 - http://www.abf.co.uk/documents/pdfs/2010/2010_corporate_responsibility_report.
pdf & TwO Code of Conduct
ABF: Measuring our sustainability, CSR report 2010 pg 7 http://www.abf.co.uk/documents/pdfs/2010/2010_corporate_responsibility_report.
Coca Cola
Answers Subscore Score
75.00
Yes 25.00
50.00
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
27.78
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
22.22
No 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 11.11
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 11.11
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
22.62
8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
14.29
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
80.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
205.4051.35
Coca Cola Danone
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.7050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
The Coca-Cola Company, “2010/ 2011 GRI Report,’ December 2011, <http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/TCCC_2010_2011_GRI_
Report.pdf> (5 July 2012)
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=00475641564-03
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=00475641564-03
2011 Trade Association Payments
33.33
NA
NA
16.67NA
NA
16.67
33.33
33.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
The Coca-Cola Company, “Reasons to believe - 2010/2011 Sustainability Report’ 29 Dec 2011,
<http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/TCCC_2010_2011_Sustainability_Report_Full.pdf> (29 May 2012)
http://www.sustainabilityconsortium.org/member-news/sustainable-sugar-comes-to-market-sweet-news-for-the-environment/
http://www.honesttea.com/community/sustainability/missionreport/pdfs/2011_Mission_Report.pdf
http://www.bonsucro.com/anNouncements.html 8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
NA
NA
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
NA
The Coca-Cola Company, “Reasons to believe - 2010/2011 Sustainability Report’ 29 Dec 2011,
<http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/TCCC_2010_2011_Sustainability_Report_Full.pdf> (29 May 2012)
Illy website, “Supporting the World’s Coffee Growing Communities,’ 2010, <http://www.illy.com/wps/wcm/connect/en/company/supporting-growth-
community> (5 July 2012)
http://www.honesttea.com/community/sustainability/missionreport/pdfs/2011_Mission_Report.pdf
The Coca-Cola Company, “SEC Form 10-K’ http://in.news.yahoo.com/coca-cola-jain-irrigation-showcase-modern-mango-
farming-114139634--finance.html http://www.coca-colacompany.com/sustainabilityreport/world/sustainable-agriculture.html#section-piloting-sustainable-farming-projects-worldwide
NA
5.00
5.00
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
supplier engagement http://csrreport.2010.coca-colahellenic.com/images/pages/files/download_center/
supplier_engagement.pdf
http://www.coca-colaindia.com/sustainability/suppliers.html
http://www.coca-colaindia.com/sustainability/suppliers.html
The Coca Cola Company Sustainability report 2012: as of December 31, 2010; supplier engagement
http://csrreport.2010.coca-colahellenic.com/images/pages/files/download_center/supplier_engagement.pdf
Danone
Answers Subscore Score
68.33
Yes 35.00
33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
41.67
25.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
16.67
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 16.67
0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
35.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
35.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.00
Yes 5.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 5.00
No 0.00
80.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
225.0056.25
Danone General Mills
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.1050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
DaNone Sustainability Report 2010 4.17
DaNone sustainability report, 2011 - http://www.daNone.de/daNone/downloadcenter/2011_sustainable_report.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm.
DaNone, Sustainability Report 2010, 2011 - http://www.daNone.de/daNone/downloadcenter/2011_sustainable_report.pdf;
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
33.33
NA
NA
11.1111.11
11.11
NA
33.33
33.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
DaNone sustainability report, 2011 - http://www.daNone.de/daNone/downloadcenter/2011_sustainable_report.pdf
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
NA
NA
DaNone Ecosystem Fund 4.55
4.55
4.55
DaNone Sustainability report 2011; DaNone Annual report 2011 4.55
4.55
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
DaNone Forest Footprint Policy - http://www.daNone.com/images/pdf/daNone_forest_footprint_policy_en.pdf
4.55
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 4.55
NA
100.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 20.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 and 2009 20.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 20.00
DaNone Sustainability Report 2011 20.00
20.00
General Mills
Answers Subscore Score
21.67
Yes 5.00
16.67
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
4.17
4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
12.88
8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
4.55
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
60.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
98.7124.68
General Mills Kellogg's
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.5050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
GRI website, Resource Library, `GRI reports list 1999-2012`, <https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Reports-List-1999-2012.zip>
(11 June 2012)
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=G&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
Major U.S. Trade Association Memberships - http://www.generalmills.com/en/Responsibility/community_engagement/Civic_involvement/2011_report.aspx
General Mills Corporate Social Responsibility 2010 <http://generalmills.com/~/media/Files/CSR_report_archives/2010_csr.ashx>
33.33
NA
NA
16.6716.67
NA
NA
33.33
33.33
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
In Rogers, H. (2010) Sweet & Lowdown in Mother Jones, May/Jun 2010, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p58-79
General Mills: Environmental Sustainability. Sustainable Agriculture - http://www.generalmills.com/~/media/Files/sustainability/GM_agriculture.ashx
NA
4.17
NA
100.00
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012 20.00
General Mills Global Responsibility 2012 20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
General Mills website, <http://www.generalmills.com/Responsibility/Sourcing/facility_audits.aspx>,
accessed 19 June 2012
Kellogg's
Answers Subscore Score
58.33
Yes 25.00
33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
4.17
4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
16.67
16.67
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
80.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
159.1739.79
Kellogg's Mars
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.1050.00
16.67
16.67
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm 16.67
100.00
33.33
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.76
NA4.76
4.76
4.76
GRI website, Resource Library, `GRI reports list 1999-2012`, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Reports-List-1999-2012.zip
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do;TRPUBLICID=pNBxQ2rbMw85ZyLL78jypLkhVPcqJVpyw5SygGTSdSJvq6KQJlD1!1395149453?letter=K&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report - http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdf
33.33
8.33
8.33
8.33NA
8.33
NA
33.33
8.33
NA
NA
8.33
8.33
8.33
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
4.55
NA
4.55
4.55
4.55
NA
http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/working-with-growers/additional-interactions-with-growers
http://kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/sustainable-agriculture/working-with-growers/additional-interactions-with-growers
4.55
4.55
NA
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Kellogg website, http://www.kelloggcompany.com/uploadedFiles/CaliforniaTransparencyinSupplyChai
nAct.pdf Accessed 5 July 2012
Kellogg website, http://www.kelloggcompany.com/uploadedFiles/CaliforniaTransparencyinSupplyChai
nAct.pdf Accessed 5 July 2012
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report - http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdf
Kellogg Company 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report - http://www.kelloggcorporateresponsibility.com/pdfs/2011_Kelloggs_CRR.pdf
Mars
Answers Subscore Score
38.33
Yes 5.00
33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
42.86
9.52
Yes 4.76
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.76
NA 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00NA 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
33.33
Yes 8.33
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
43.18
25.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
18.18
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
NA 0.00
Yes 4.55
No 0.00
Yes 4.55
NA 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
80.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
204.3751.09
Mars Mondelez
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.0050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/cocoa.aspx 4.17
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
Mars website, ‘Our approach to business: GRI G3 Index’, http://mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-approach-to-business/assurance-
statements/gri-g3-index.aspx
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=99937329074-65&isListLobbyistView=true
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
‘Mars, Principles in Action Summary 2010,’ 2012, <http://mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-4.aspx> (24 May 2012), p.46.
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.565.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
6.67
NA
6.67
6.67
6.67
6.67
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
Principles in Action Summary 2010, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-2.aspx#FullDownload
Principles in Action Summary 2010, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-2.aspx#FullDownload
(31 October 2012) http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/tea-and-coffee.aspx
(31 October 2012) http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/tea-and-coffee.aspx
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
Principles in Action 2012, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/cocoa.aspx
http://www.mars.com/global/press-center/case-study-detail/casestudy.aspx?SiteId=147&Id=3675
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/tea-and-coffee.aspx & http://www.mars.com/global/press-center/case-study-detail/casestudy.aspx?SiteId=147&Id=3676
Principles in Action Summary 2010, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-2.aspx#FullDownload
Principles in Action Summary 2010, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-2.aspx#FullDownload
Principles in Action http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/step-2.aspx#FullDownload
3.85
3.85
NA
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Principles in Action Summary 2010, pg. 41 & http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/supplier-relationships.aspx
Principles in Action Summary 2010, pg. 41 & http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/supplier-relationships.aspx
Mars website, ‘Our Supply Chain Approach: Selecting and Monitoring Suppliers’, 2011, http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/supplier-
relationships.aspxhttp
http://www.mars.com/global/about-mars/mars-pia/our-supply-chain/supplier-relationships.aspx
Mondelez
Answers Subscore Score
50.00
No 0.00
50.00
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
40.56
8.33
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.56
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
26.67
Yes 6.67
NA 0.00
Yes 6.67
Yes 6.67
Yes 6.67
No 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
3.85
0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
3.85
Yes 3.85
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
60.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
154.4038.60
Mondelez Nestle
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
1.0050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
4.17
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/displaylobbyist.do?id=19807921101-45&isListLobbyistView=true
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
2011 Trade Association Payments
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’delicious world: Our 2010 report’
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’; http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_respo
nsibility_report.pdf
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.565.56
5.56
5.56
33.33
6.67
6.67
6.67
6.67
6.67
NA
NANANA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
Panhuysen, S. and M. Van Reenen (Tropical Commodity Coalition), Coffee Barometer 2012,
<http://www.newforesight.com/sites/default/files/newforesight/TCC_CoffeeBarometer2012.pdf> (22 May 2012).
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, ; Kraft Foods, ‘Climate Change’,
<http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/deliciousworld/sustainability/climate.aspx> (12 July 2012
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_respo
nsibility_report.pdf
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’. http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_respo
nsibility_report.pdf
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’. http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_respo
nsibility_report.pdf
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
Kraft Foods, ‘Climate Change,’ No date, <http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/DeliciousWorld/sustainability/climate.aspx>
(22 May 2012).
3.57
3.57
3.57
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2011 report’, http://www.mondelezinternational.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_d
eliciousworld2011.pdf
Kraft Foods, ‘Creating a more delicious world: Our 2010 report’, http://www.kraftfoodscompany.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/pdf/kraftfoods_respo
nsibility_report.pdf
Man-Kwun Chan, ‘Improving Opportunities for Women in Smallholder-based Supply Chains Business case and practical guidance for international food companies,’ 2010 ; AD- Kraft Foods, 'Letter to Greenpeace UK regarding allegations against the Sinar Mas
group, including APP', 1 July 2010.<http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Documents/gender-value-chain-
guide.pdf> (23 May 2012).
Nestle
Answers Subscore Score
83.33
Yes 50.00
33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
43.61
12.50
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
11.11
Yes 5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
20.00
Yes 6.67
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 6.67
Yes 6.67
NA 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00NA 0.00
57.14
25.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
32.14
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
Yes 3.57
80.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
264.0966.02
Nestle PepsiCo
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.5050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.174.17
4.17
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 4.17
GRI website, Resource Library, `GRI reports list 1999-2012`, <https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Reports-List-1999-2012.zip>
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://news.bbc.co.uk/Nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/paNorama_nestle.pdf-
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 http://www.nestle.com/asset-library/Documents/Library/Documents/Corporate_Soc
ial_Responsibility/2011-CSV-report.pdf
http://www.nestle.ie/media/newsfeatures/nestle-cocoa-plan-delivers-more-sustainable-cocoa-navigate
33.33
5.56
5.56
5.565.56
5.56
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 5.56
33.33
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 11.11
NA
11.11
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 NA
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 NA
NA
NANA
11.11
100.00
50.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 8.33
8.33
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011, p.121 http://www.nestle.co.uk/CSV/RESPONSIBLESOURCINGANDRURALDEVELOPMENT/
Pages/Coffee.aspx
8.33
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 8.33
CSV Rural Development 2010 www.nestle.com/asset.../2010-RD-report.pdf 8.33
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 8.33
50.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
3.57
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
3.57
Nestlé, Nestlé Cocoa Plan, Sourcing Cocoa & Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Summary Report 2011, March 2012 + Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011
Nestlé website, CSV, Creating Shared Value Case Studies, ‘Grains Quality Improvement Project – Central and West Africa’, March 2011
<http://www.Nestlé.com/CSV/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Grains-Quality-Improvement-Project-Central-and-West-Africa.aspx> (5 June
2012) and CSV 2011, p.173
Nestlé website, CSV, Creating Shared Value Case Studies, ‘Grains Quality Improvement Project – Central and West Africa’, March 2011
<http://www.Nestlé.com/CSV/CreatingSharedValueCaseStudies/AllCaseStudies/Pages/Grains-Quality-Improvement-Project-Central-and-West-Africa.aspx> (5 June
2012) and CSV 2011, p.173
3.57
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 3.57
100.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 20.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 20.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 20.00
Nestlé, Creating Shared Value Report 2011 20.00
20.00
PepsiCo
Answers Subscore Score
41.67
Yes 25.00
16.67
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 16.67
31.94
4.17
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 4.17No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
5.56
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 5.56
22.22
Yes 11.11
NA 0.00
No 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00
NA 0.00NA 0.00Yes 11.11
11.90
8.33
Yes 8.33
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.57
No 0.00
No 0.00
60.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
145.5236.38
PepsiCo Unilever
Reference Weight
100.00
50.00
0.5050.00
16.67
16.67
16.67
100.00
33.33
4.17
4.17
4.17
4.17
2010 Sustainability report 4.174.17
4.17
4.17
PepsiCo, “India Corporate Citizenship Report 2010/11. Performance with Purpose. The Promise of PepsiCo,” <http://pepsicoindia.co.in/Download/Pepsi%20Citizenship
%20Report-%202010-11.pdf> (8 October 2012).
Professional Trade Group Memberships/Partnerships - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Overview/Stakeholder-Engagement.html
33.33
6.67
6.67
6.676.67
6.67
PepsiCo, “Sustainability reporting: KPI highlights” NA
33.33
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.76
NA4.76
PepsiCo, “2010 Sustainability Report” NA
100.00
50.00
8.33
8.33
http://www.rspo.org/file/ACOP2012-OM_CGM%20Submitters(5).pdf
PepsiCo, “Environmental Sustainability, Agriculture” - http://www.pepsico.com/Purpose/Environmental-Sustainability/Agriculture.html
8.33
8.33
8.33
8.33
50.00
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
NA
100.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
PepsiCo, “2010 Sustainability Report Summary” - http://www.pepsico.com/Download/PepsiCo_2010_Sustainability_Summary.pdf
PepsiCo’s Disclosure in response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act (SB 657)- http://www.pepsico.com/Download/CA%20Transparency_PEP
%20disclosure.pdf
PepsiCo’s Disclosure in response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act (SB 657)- http://www.pepsico.com/Download/CA%20Transparency_PEP
%20disclosure.pdf
PepsiCo’s Disclosure in response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act (SB 657)- http://www.pepsico.com/Download/CA%20Transparency_PEP
%20disclosure.pdf
Unilever
Answers Subscore Score
58.33
Yes 25.00
33.33
Yes 16.67
Yes 16.67
No 0.00
59.17
12.50
Yes 4.17
No 0.00
Yes 4.17
Yes 4.17
No 0.00No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
13.33
No 0.00
Yes 6.67
No 0.00No 0.00
Yes 6.67
NA 0.00
33.33
Yes 4.76
Yes 4.76
Yes 4.76
Yes 4.76
Yes 4.76
Yes 4.76
NA 0.00Yes 4.76NA 0.00
36.54
25.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
Yes 8.33
11.54
Yes 3.85
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.85
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
Yes 3.85
No 0.00
NA 0.00
60.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
Yes 20.00
No 0.00
No 0.00
214.0453.51
Unilever
Reference
GRI website, Resource Library, `GRI reports list 1999-2012`, <https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Reports-List-1999-2012.zip>
(11 June 2012).
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do;TRPUBLICID=ndh0Q1QVnDpxGDm24b5pJKHZRfGpbczcBNGT6Mvn4gyNK7Bq0HpQ!1395149453?letter=U&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
http://ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister/public/consultation/listlobbyists.do?letter=N&d-7641134-p=2&alphabetName=LatinAlphabet
Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing - Standards guide for our supply partners, Unilever publication, May 2011, Unilever website, Sustainable living, News&resources, Reports and publications, „Publications archive‟,
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/publications/publicationsarchive/index.aspx (29/05/2012).
Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing - Standards guide for our supply partners, Unilever publication, May 2011
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/cocoa-sugar/
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing - Standards guide for our supply partners, Unilever publication, May 2011, Unilever website, Sustainable living, News&resources, Reports and publications, „Publications archive‟,
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/news/publications/publicationsarchive/index.aspx (29/05/2012); Unilever website, Sustainability, Environmental
sustainability, Sustainable agricultural sourcing, „Sustainable tea‟,
http://www.unilever.com/images/Unilever%20Responsible%20and%20Sustainable%20sourcing_tcm13-265398.pdf
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010 http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/targets/
index.aspx#13-284850
Unilever sustainable living plan, 2010
http://www.unilever.com/aboutus/supplier/partnertowin/ptwawards/
http://www.unilever.com/aboutus/supplier/partnertowin/ptwawards/
Unilever website, Sustainable living, Sustainable sourcing, Sustainable palm oil, „About palm oil‟,
http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/palmoil/about/index.aspx
Unilever website, Sustainable living, „Targets & performance‟, http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/sustainablesourcing/targets Unilever
commits to sourcing all its tea from sustainable ethical sources‟, Unilever press release, 25 May 2007,
http://www.unilever.com/mediacentre/pressreleases/2007/sustainable-tea-sourcing.aspx
Unilever Sustainable Living Plan - Progress Report 2011, Unilever publication, Growing for the future - Tomatoes: for sustainable future brochure, Unilever
publication, 2003,, Unilever website, Sustainable living, News&resources, Reports and publications, „Publications archive‟, http://www.unilever.com/sustainable-
living/news/publications/publicationsarchive/index.aspx
Unilever Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing: Standards guide for our supply partners http://www.unilever.com/images/Responsible_and_Sustainable_Sourcing-
Standards_guide_for_our_supply_chain_partners(2011)_tcm13-277604.pdf
Unilever Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing: Standards guide for our supply partners http://www.unilever.com/images/Responsible_and_Sustainable_Sourcing-
Standards_guide_for_our_supply_chain_partners(2011)_tcm13-277604.pdf
Unilever Responsible and Sustainable Sourcing: Standards guide for our supply partners http://www.unilever.com/images/Responsible_and_Sustainable_Sourcing-
Standards_guide_for_our_supply_chain_partners(2011)_tcm13-277604.pdf