belgian federal agency for the safety of the food chain heads of agencies workshop on measuring...
TRANSCRIPT
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Heads of Agencies Workshop on Measuring Outcome3-4 April 2014
Feedback to the MANCP WG (May 2014)
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Context
• Meeting of the Heads of Agencies or their representatives– Sharing experience– Networking between agencies– Forum to discuss management issues
• Sharing best practices: 4 workshops– Sampling programs– Smiley system and other methods to communicate
with stakeholders– Measuring outcome– Influencing behaviour of FBO
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Goals of the workshop
• Exchange views• Clarify definitions• Understanding the approaches of different MS
– Presentations (plenary)– Discussion (smaller workgroups & plenary)
• To give feedback to the next meeting of Heads of Agencies
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Presentations
• International context – MANCP Network Document on
Performance Objectives & Indicators (UK)– Codex Alimentarius (CCFICS) proposal for
new work on ‘monitoring performance of national food control systems’ (EC)
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Presentations
• Existing tools – global – Food safety systems – Share & compare (FI)– Barometers for the safety of the food chain:
approach & methodology (BE)– Indicator systems for food chain safety
strategy (HU)
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Presentations
• Existing tools – specific– Using a consumer survey to monitor delivery of
strategy (UK)– Measuring microbial food safety output and
comparing self-checking systems of FBO in BE– Evaluation & Impact Assessment by Dutch
Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA)
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Outcome of the discussions
• Defining the scope– Need for further clarification and harmonized
understanding of different key terms (output, outcome, impact) finalized MANCP network document could be used as a reference tool !
– Measuring FS outcome • ‘Must’
• Improve control systems
• Communication tool
• Link with (clearly determined) FS strategic objectives
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Outcome of the discussions
• Measuring outcome– Indicators vs. scope
• Performance measurement vs. FS status
• Outcome vs. impact measurement
• Improve vs. compare systems
• Communication
# of indicators and level at which we set indicators depend on what we want to measure
– Baseline & trends vs. status
– Criteria for indicators• Robustness, comparability between systems,
quantifiable/qualitative…
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Outcome of the discussions
• Is a common approach possible?– Standarization or harmonization of indicators or
criteria: no consensus– Measuring systems can be set up at both national
and supra-national level– (Peer) reviewing & ranking: no consensus– Guidance for elaborating measuring tools
sharing measuring outcome vs. measuring output
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Final conclusions
• Workshop was a good exercise in sharing views and practice
• Further reflection needed (CCFICS / EU / national level)
• Current state of play is encouraging to develop tools for measuring outcome
Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain
Next steps?
• Feedback to HoA (June – Athens)– Continuation?– Avoid overlap – be complementary
• Outcome of the workshop Website FASFC
WIKI MANCP