BELL HIGH BELL HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL

Performance Performance DialogueDialogue

CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and Performance Meter Progress Performance Meter Progress

ReportReportPLC MeetingPLC Meeting

August 27, 2013August 27, 2013

Objectives

• Review the results of the 2013 CST results:• What does the data show for our school, our department, our PLC?• What are the obvious patterns among the data?• What are the trends or commonalities?• Describe the range of data. What are the high (s), low (s) and average (s)?

• Dialogue on classroom implications

• Analyze CST results and prior year CSTs and PAs to date

• Use strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps

2

BHS

Performance Management Cycle

3

School Vision, Goals, and Core Beliefs

BHS

Strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps

4

BHS

Key Instructional Strategies

• What have been your key strategies (action steps) to increasing math, ELA, science and social studies achievement?

• How might you describe the level of implementation around those? Who is doing it and how often? How effectively?

• What challenges, if any, have you experienced during implementation?

5

BHS

English Language ArtsCA Standards Test Data Summary

Two Year Comparison

Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.

2013 %Adv. & Prof.

% DIFFAdv. & Prof.

2012 %FBB &

BB

2013 %FBB &

BB

% DIFFFBB &

BB

English 9

34 39 +5 29 25 -4

English 10

32 38 +6 28 25 -3

English 11

38 38 0 26 21 -5

English Total

34 38 +4 28 24 -4

BHS

English Language ArtsCA Standards Test Four Year Trend

BHS

English Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model

2012CST

PA 1Adv/Prof

PA 1Participation

Rate

PA 2Adv/Prof

PA 2Participation

Rate

PA 3Adv/Prof

PA 3Participation

Rate

2013CST

ELA 9 34% 36% 96.6% 23% 83.3% 31% 95% 39%

ELA 10 32% 49% 98.1% 33% 84.6% 43% 95% 38%

BHS

English Language ArtsCAHSEE Census

Two Year Comparison

English ELA % Passing

ELA % Proficient

2013Total

72% 38%

2012Total

72% 33%

Difference +0% +5%

High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores

BHS

MathematicsCA Standards Test Data Summary

Two Year Comparison

Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.

2013 %Adv. & Prof.

% DIFFAdv. & Prof.

2012 %FBB &

BB

2013 %FBB &

BB

% DIFFFBB &

BB

Algebra 20 23 +3 58 53 -5

Geometry 15 8 -7 63 75 +12

Algebra 2

41 30 -11 37 46 +9

MathTotal

25 21 -4 52 57 +5

BHS

MathematicsCA Standards Test Four Year Trend

BHS

Mathematic Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model

2012CST

PA 1Adv/Prof

PA 1Participation

Rate

PA 2Adv/Prof

PA 2Participation

Rate

PA 3Adv/Prof

PA 3Participation

Rate

2013CST

Algebra 20% 32% 78.3% 21% 77.3% 25% 95.7% 23%

Geomet 15% 6% 74.4% 2% 79.1% 9% 94.5% 8%

BHS

MathematicsCAHSEE Census

Two Year Comparison

Math Math % Passing

Math % Proficient

2013Total

82% 59.2%

2012Total

81% 55%

Difference +1% +4.2%

High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores

BHS

Social StudiesCA Standards Test Data Summary

Two Year Comparison

Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.

2013 %Adv. & Prof.

% DIFFAdv. & Prof.

2012 %FBB &

BB

2013 %FBB &

BB

% DIFFFBB &

BB

US History

41 47 +6 29 22 -7

World History

30 33 +3 37 36 -1

HistoryTotal

35 39 +4 33 30 -3

BHS

Social StudiesCA Standards Test Four Year Trend

BHS

Social Studies Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model

2012CST

PA 1Adv/Prof

PA 1Participation

Rate

PA 2Adv/Prof

PA 2Participation

Rate

PA 3Adv/Prof

PA 3Participation

Rate

2013CST

History 10 30% 37% 93.8% 25% 67.5% 31% 95% 36%

BHS

Science CA Standards Test Data Summary

Two Year Comparison

Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.

2013 %Adv. & Prof.

% DIFFAdv. & Prof.

2012 %FBB &

BB

2013%FBB &

BB

% DIFFFBB &

BB

Life Science

33 40 +7 32 27 -5

Biology 37 27 -10 26 32 +6

Chem. 22 30 +8 48 32 -16

ScienceTotal

30 32 +2 35 31 -4

BHS

ScienceCA Standards Test Four Year Trend

BHS

Science Periodic Assessments - CSTPredictive Model

2012CST

PA 1

Adv/Prof

PA 1Participation

Rate

PA 2

Adv/Prof

PA 2Participation

Rate

PA 3Adv/Prof

PA 3Participation

Rate

2013CST

Biology 37% 7% 77.1% 6% 71.3% 12% 95.7% 27%

Chemistry 22% 38% 91.7% 17% 73.3% 29% 94.5% 30%

BHS

2012-13 QEIA Goals

BHSAchievement

Requirements2012-13

QEIA Goals

2012-13QEIA Results

MetYes / No

9th Grade ELA CST Proficiency or

Above

36% 39% YES

9th Grade Matriculation

71% 78% YES

9th Grade Algebra 1 CST Proficiency or

Above

21% 28% YES

World & US History Proficiency or

Above

24% 39% YES

Biology & Chemistry

Proficiency or Above

20% 28% YES

API Exceed Target Growth

7 20**Estimate without

SPED

Pending

Interpreting Progress Towards Targets

In looking at the PA and CST results, what do you notice? What patterns do you see? Have you reached your CST target?If you made gains you desired, what attributed to the gains in your estimates?If this data remains constant, what might be the possible reasons?What successful instructional practices/strategies are being implemented to address the needs of your students?What are your hunches about what might need to happen next to impact this data?What other data do you still need?

22

BHS

Revisiting Strategies

Based on your data for the school year and your classroom observations, to what extent is your instructional plan working effectively?

What strategies did you call out?

23

BHS

Strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps

24

BHS

Intervention Design – How do we respond to the data?

Based on today’s dialogue what can you add, continue, or modify to sustain and/or improve your results?

How can we leverage the strengths of your department to support our school in improving?

As the Instructional Leader, Department Administrator, Department Chair, what action/commitment will be your first priority?

25

BHS