benthic microbes – organisms and ecology … · plankton ecology group icbm lecture aims at the...

28
13.01.2009 1 Benthic microbes organisms Benthic microbes organisms and ecology Helmut Hillebrand Plankton Ecology Group ICBM Lecture aims At the end of this lecture students are At the end of this lecture, students are supposed to Know basic features of benthic microbial organisms Understand substratum – organism interactions Understand the basic interactions between bacteria, protists and microalgae

Upload: vanque

Post on 30-Mar-2019

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

13.01.2009

1

Benthic microbes – organismsBenthic microbes organisms and ecology

Helmut HillebrandPlankton Ecology Group

ICBM

Lecture aims

At the end of this lecture students are At the end of this lecture, students are supposed to Know basic features of benthic microbial

organisms Understand substratum – organism

interactions Understand the basic interactions between

bacteria, protists and microalgae

13.01.2009

2

Lecture structure

The players: microbial eukaryotes in the The players: microbial eukaryotes in the benthos

The game board: substratum as a determinant of microbial life

The game: interactions between The game: interactions between organisms in the benthos

Synthesis

Players: autotrophic eukaryotes

13.01.2009

3

Taxonomic overview

Cyanobacteria Cyanobacteria Prokaryotes Freshwater &

marine Unicells,

filaments, colonies

Partly N2-fixing: heterocysts

Taxonomic overview

Rhodophyta Rhodophyta Marine Filaments,

crusts and thalli

Crustose algae highly important in reef development

13.01.2009

4

Taxonomic overview

Heterokontophy Heterokontophyta: Chrysophyta Flagellated Unicells,

pelagic, few fcolony forming

benthic Marine and

Freshwater

Taxonomic overview

Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyta Freshwater &

marine Silicate frustule,

partly with raphe

13.01.2009

5

Taxonomic overview

Valve organization and colony formation Valve organization and colony formation in diatoms

Taxonomic overview

MOBILE

13.01.2009

6

Taxonomic overview Phaeophyta Phaeophyta

Marine, thalli Habitat forming species in many

coastal ecosystems (Fucus, kelp)

Taxonomic overview Chlorophyta Chlorophyta

Freshwater & marine Unicells, filaments, colonies,

thalli

13.01.2009

7

Players: heterotrophic eukaryotes

Players: heterotrophic eukaryotes

Amoeba Amoeba Flagellates

13.01.2009

8

Players: heterotrophic eukaryotes

Cili t Ciliates

Players: heterotrophic eukaryotes

Meiofauna Meiofauna Rotifers Nematodes Copepods Ostracods

13.01.2009

9

Players: mixotrophs

Game board

Sediment Hard substrateSediment Hard substrate

13.01.2009

10

Game board: Sediment

Sediment picture Sediment picture

Some sediment constraints Sediments are Sediments are

inherently instable Underwood &

Paterson 1995: Diatoms enhance sediment stability by EPS production

C l ti b t Correlation between Chlorophyll and EPS in sediments

Photographs: Low diatom and high diatom sediment, with EPS coating

13.01.2009

11

Some sediment constraints

Kühl & Kühl & Jörgensen 1992: Vertical profile of light and phtosynthesis in a 3mm sediment core

Some sediment constraints

Hüttel et Hüttel et al. 1996: Sediment-Topography alters fluid and particle i t iintrusion into the water column

13.01.2009

12

Some sediment constraints

Bioturbation Bioturbation

Players in the sediment

Hatched meiofaunaHatched meiofaunaBlack bacteriaWhite algae

Upper 5mm sediment biota: Sundbäck et al.

13.01.2009

13

Players in the sediment

Microbial mats Microbial mats

Game board: Hard substrates

Periphyton Periphyton

13.01.2009

14

Some hard substrate constraints

Benthic boundary layer Benthic boundary layer

Some hard substrate constraints

Burkholder et al Burkholder et al. 1990: Uptake of P by adnate algae (AD) is only a fraction of loosely attached algae (LA) at control and P-enriched site

13.01.2009

15

Some hard substrate constraints

Architecture and biofilms Architecture and biofilms

Some hard substrate constraints

Succession Succession

13.01.2009

16

light

physical forcing

Players on hard substrates

periphyton

phytoplankton

macrophytesnutrients

competition

grazing

grazers

substratum

internal processes

nutrient regeneration

Players on hard substrates

13.01.2009

17

Games – case studies

Interactions: Interactions: Competition Grazing Nutrient recycling Mixotrophyp y

Game 1: competition between autotrophs on sediments

Competition between cyanobacteria and Competition between cyanobacteria and diatoms on sediments of different grain size and at different temperatures

13.01.2009

18

Game 1: competition between autotrophs on sediments

Game 2: Trophic interactions in sediments

Esptein et al. Esptein et al. 1997, Microbial Ecology. Trophic interactions in sedmient microbial food webs

S l tt Seasonal patterns of algae and bacteria as well as consumption on algae and bacteria

13.01.2009

19

Esptein et al.

Game 2: Trophic interactions in sediments

Esptein et al. 1997, Microbial Ecology. Trophic interactions in sedmient microbial food webs

S l tt

Ciliates

Seasonal patterns of algae and bacteria as well as consumption on algae and bacteria

Game 3: Multiple stressors in sediment communities

Addition ofAddition of nutrients and antifouling agent CPT had only small effects on microbenthic communities, systemssystems remained autotroph, recovery was rapid

Sundbäck et al. 2007, MEPS Low Nutrient High nutrient

13.01.2009

20

Game 4: Nutrient and grazing effects on epilithic algae

closed cages open cages uncaged control plots

4 replicates for each factor combination

NPKnutrient addition in two (ambient, enriched) or four (no, low, mid, high) categories

Game 4: Nutrient and grazing effects on epilithic algae

0.08

0.1

m3/

cm2)

High nutrient uptake - high grazing riskANOVA:

Graz***;

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

no low med high

nutrient treatment

Alg

al b

iovo

lum

e (m Nut***;

GxN+

Hillebrand et al. 2000, MEPS

Positive effects of nutrients, negative effects of grazing

Higher grazing effects with higher nutrient supply

“Trade-off” between algal growth types (nutrient uptake vs. grazing resistance)

Low grazing risk - low nutrient

availability

13.01.2009

21

Game 5: Microbial food webs on hard substrates

Game 5: Increased DOC supply

increased total periphytonincreased total periphyton biomass in almost all experiments, whereas increased P supply incresed total biomass only if algae were present.

13.01.2009

22

Game 5: The effects of DOC and P on the ratio of heterotrophic to autotrophic The effects of DOC and P on the ratio of heterotrophic to autotrophic

abundance strongly depended on trophic structure, where additional resources enhanced the autotroph component when the basal heterotrophs were limited by low organic C or by strong consumer pressure.

Game 5:

Purely heterotrophic biofilms had higher C:P ratios than autotrophic assemblages. Increased P-supply decreased periphyton C:P throughout except for the experiment with the highest trophic complexity, as including more elements of the

b l f d b l d h hmicrobial food web led to higher retention of P within the assemblage.

13.01.2009

23

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

Exp 2: Factorial combination of 3Exp 1: 3 grazer treatments at low ambient nutrient concentrations (N-limited)

Sampling at day 0, 2, 4, 8, 15, 23

control

Theodoxus

Exp 2: Factorial combination of 3 grazer- and 2 light-manipulations (P-

limited)

Sampling at day

0, 4, 15

+ Lightcontrol

Theodoxus

Bythinia

Theodoxus

Bythinia

0, 4, 15

+++ Light

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

Algae: strong reduction already after 2-4 days; Reduction in CONHeterotrophs (not shown):Bacteria: strong reduction after 8 d, no change in CONCiliates: strong reduction after 8dMeiofauna: reduction after 8-15 d, increase in Con0 1

0.2

0.3

0.4

biov

olum

e (m

m3 c

m-2

) Control Bithynia Theodoxus

increase in Con

Hillebrand, Burgmer, de Montpellier, Liess, Reiss, Wickham

Time (d)

0 4 8 12 16 20 240.0

0.1

Alg

al

13.01.2009

24

Algae: strong reduction already after 0.4

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

2-4 days; Reduction in CONHeterotrophs (not shown):Bacteria: strong reduction after 8 d, no change in CONCiliates: strong reduction after 8dMeiofauna: reduction after 8-15 d, increase in Con

0.1

0.2

0.3

Alg

al b

iovo

lum

e (m

m3 c

m-2

) Control Bithynia Theodoxus

Hillebrand, Burgmer, de Montpellier, Liess, Reiss, Wickham

Time (d)

0 4 8 12 16 20 240.0

Temporal uncoupling of response to grazer presence Increasing heterotrophy in CON with time

N-Limitation indicatedC:N Theodoxus << Bithynia; C:P Theodoxus < Bithynia

18

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

8

10

12

14

16

18

C:N

mol

ar r

atio

• Grazer presence increased periphyton N

• Significant effects of BIT, not THE, on C:N

• Bithynia also increased DIN

Time (d)

0 4 8 12 16 20 244

6

8

Control Bithynia Theodoxus

ANOVA: graz + graz X time **

13.01.2009

25

P-Limitation indicatedC:N Theodoxus << Bithynia; C:P Theodoxus < Bithynia

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

400

600

800

1000

C:P

mol

ar r

atio

start con bit the

• Both grazers increase periphyton P significantly

start HL4 HL15 LL4 LL15

Sampling

200

ANOVA: graz *** light ** graz X light ns

P-Limitation indicatedC:N Theodoxus << Bithynia; C:P Theodoxus < Bithynia

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

400

600

800

1000

C:P

mol

ar r

atio

start con bit the

• Both grazers increase periphyton P significantly

• Low light increases periphyton P (and N) - relative release from nutrient limitation

start HL4 HL15 LL4 LL15

Sampling

200

ANOVA: graz *** light ** graz X light ns

13.01.2009

26

P-Limitation indicatedC:N Theodoxus << Bithynia; C:P Theodoxus < Bithynia

Game 6: Periphyton biomass and stoichiometry

400

600

800

1000

C:P

mol

ar r

atio

start con bit the

• Both grazers increase periphyton P significantly

• Low light increases periphyton P (and N) - relative release from nutrient limitation

• significant effects of Bithynia, not Theodoxus on C:Nstart HL4 HL15 LL4 LL15

Sampling

200

ANOVA: graz *** light ** graz X light ns

Game 7: Mixotrophy in the benthos

Mixotroph abundance in men

t darklight

2x105

Mixotroph abundance in sediments of Kiel Bight - increases in the dark - only <5% of total abundance

September October

abun

dan

ces

/ cm

³ se

dim

0

1x105

Station 3

gella

tes

80

100

sediment depth (mm)

0-3 3-6 6-9

% to

tal n

anof

lag

0

20

40

60

Moorthi, PhD thesis

13.01.2009

27

Game 7: Mixotrophy in the benthos

Proportion es 12

September, GemanyMarch, CaliforniaJuly, Greenland Sea

Proportion of mixotrophs increase with salinity

0 10 20 30 40 50

ates

7

8

0 10 20 30 40 50

% to

tal n

anof

lage

llate

(mea

n +

SE

)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12sediment (+brine) light sediment, dark

plankton light l kt d k

r=0.70, p<0.01, N=48 r=0.70, p<0.01, N=48

salinity (psu)

0 10 20 30 40 50

% to

tal n

anof

lage

lla(m

ean

+ S

E)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

salinity (psu)

0 10 20 30 40 50

plankton, light plankton, dark

r=0.68, p<0.01, N=30 r=0.64, p<0.01, N=30

Moorthi, PhD thesis

Summary

Benthic Benthic eukryotic miroorganisms encompass a majority of phylogenetic groups

13.01.2009

28

Summary

Benthic eukryotic Benthic eukryotic miroorganisms interact by important direct (feeding, competition) and indirect (nutrient regeneration) interactions.