better aircraft maintenance
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
1/53
AU/ACSC/3181/AY06
AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY
BUILDING A BETTER AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE OFFICER
by Jeffrey R. King, USAF
A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements
Instructor: Major Kenton A. Ruthardt
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2006
Unlimited Distribution A: Approved for Public Release
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
2/53
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the author(s) and do not
reflect the official policy or position of the US government or the Department of Defense. In
accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the
United States government.
ii
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
3/53
Contents
Page
DISCLAIMER............................................................................................................................... ii BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 3
The Operating Environment.................................................................................................... 3 The National Security Environment..................................................................................... 3 The aircraft maintenance environment ................................................................................ 4 Implementation of the AEF ................................................................................................... 5
Maintenance Officer Skill Set Requirements......................................................................... 7 Maintenance Officer Education, Training, and Experience................................................. 9
Maintenance Officer Education............................................................................................ 9 Maintenance Officer Training. ........................................................................................... 10 Maintenance Officer Experience. ....................................................................................... 14 Training Initiatives and Innovations. ................................................................................. 16
ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 20 Technical expertise.............................................................................................................. 23 Maintenance Management.................................................................................................. 25 Change Management........................................................................................................... 25
RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................ 29 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 35
Areas for Future Study. ....................................................................................................... 36 APPENDIX A: CLR RECOMMENDATIONS RELEVANT TO THIS PAPER ............... 38 APPENDIX B: AMOC COURSE TOPICS.............................................................................. 39 APPENDIX C: MOIC COURSE TOPICS.............................................................................. 40
APPENDIX D: AMMOS COURSE TOPICS ......................................................................... 41 APPENDIX E: UAFES SLMC AGENDA.............................................................................. 44 APPENDIX F: DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE OFFICER CAREER BROADENING OPPORTUNITIES......................................................................................... 45 APPENDIX G: 21A CFETP AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE OFFICER CERTIFICATION TABLE ......................................................................................................................................... 46 APPENDIX H: DAU-OFFERED LEAN CBT COURSE DESCRIPTIONS ....................... 47 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 48
iii
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
4/53
BACKGROUND
Officers can never act with confidence until they are masters of their profession. Gen Henry Knox
Several changes have occurred in the maintenance operating environment and in aircraft
maintenance officer training and development activities since the last known academic review in
2002.1
Chief among them are the reorganization of the wing structure into the Combat Wing
Organization; creation of the 21AX Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP), the
Maintenance Officer Intermediate Course (MOIC), and the Advanced Maintenance and
Munitions Officers School (AMMOS); as well as the introduction of the 21A/M Developmental
Team (DT). In addition, several changes in the national security environment, including the
DoD basing structure and the type of wars we fight, continue to shape the maintenance
environment.
A mix of education, training, and experience through the assignment process facilitates
maintenance officer development. This paper will discuss maintenance officer education and
experience only as they relate to maintenance officer training, but the analysis and
recommendations will focus on training alone. This paper will determine if the current training
regimen adequately prepares maintenance officers to serve in the current and future operating
environments and will assess if changes must be made to better prepare maintenance officers to
meet the needs of the Expeditionary Air and Space Force.
The importance of maintenance officer training is derived from the importance of aircraft
maintenance itself. Since flying and fighting is at the heart of Air Force operations, the
importance of maintaining our fleet should be evident. Even so, former Chief of Staff of the Air
Force (CSAF) General Jumper sought to underscore and codify that importance when he stated,
I believe the two hardest things we do in our Air Force are flying and fixing our weapons
1
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
5/53
systems.2
Furthermore, he contended that maintenance officers should have a PhD in
maintenance, and went on to state that aircraft maintenance is an Air Force core competency.3
While aircraft maintenance is not among the Air Forces doctrinal core competencies, it spans all
five of the Agile Combat Support (ACS) Core Competencys Master Processes: Readying the
Force, Preparing the Battlespace, Positioning the Force, Employing the Force, Sustaining the
Force., and Redeploying the Force.4
Moreover, the Air Forces core competency of Developing
Airmen compels a recurring review of maintenance officer training to ensure its viability.
The Chief of Staff Logistics Review (CLR) published by Rand in 2005 also affirmed the
need for a complete and holistic review of maintenance officer training and development
processes. The CLR was initiated in response to indicators of declining readiness, heightened
operations tempo, and evolving force employment concepts.5
After a thorough review of wing-
level maintenance, the CLR listed several recommendations for improving the effectiveness and
efficiency of wing-level operations.6 Those relevant to this paper, listed in Appendix A, are
summarized in a sentence: Improve maintenance officer training, especially in the area of
maintenance management, to advance fleet health and readiness.
1 The most recent academic review of maintenance officer training discovered was: Lt Col Charles L. Webb, Whya PhD in MX? (Research paper, Air War College, 2002).
2 Gen John P. Jumper, Chiefs Sight Picture: Combat Wing Organization, undated.3 Ibid.4 Air Force Doctrine Document (AFDD) 2-4, Combat Support, 23 March 2005, 2.5 Kristen F. Lynch et al,The Air Force Chief of Staff Logistics Review, RAND Report MG-190 (Santa Monica, CA:
RAND, 2005), iii.6 Ibid., xviii-xx.
2
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
6/53
METHODOLOGYNo study is possible on the battlefield. French Field Marshall Ferdinand Foch
The Operating Environment
At least three major factors affect the aircraft maintenance officers operating
environment: the national security environment, the wing-level maintenance environment, and
the implementation of the AEF.
The National Security Environment
While America has fought small wars since her founding, these were overshadowed by
the great wars: WWI, WWII and the Cold War. In the post-Cold War era, fighting small wars
and support for humanitarian operations have stepped to the forefront. Since our enemies cannot
or will not face us in symmetric battle, they are choosing asymmetric tactics such as conducting
insurgencies and using improvised explosive devises. The opening line of the 2006 Quadrennial
Defense Review characterizes the Global War on Terrorism as The Long War, indicating we
will continue to conduct small, regional operations for the foreseeable future.7
Combined with post-Cold War rebasing, which reduced overseas bases by two-thirds,
fighting small wars requires greater responsiveness and flexibility than in the past.8
The post-
Cold War drawdown and conflicts erupting in areas without standing forces have increased the
requirement to stand up bases on-the-fly in support of contingency operations. For example, 50+
airfields were built in support of Operations ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI FREEDOM
alone.9
This ad hoc basing spreads manning and equipment thin, both in-garrison and at the
deployed locations, and places a premium on well-trained forces.10
3
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
7/53
The aircraft maintenance environment
The wing-level maintenance organizational structure, its people, and equipment shape the
aircraft maintenance environment. Aircraft maintainers have served in four wing-level
organizations over the last 30 years alone.11
The most recent reorganization reformed the
Objective Wing Organization (OWO) into the Combat Wing Organization (CWO) in late-2002.
A key element of this reorganization was to align sortie production and fleet management under
a single authority, the Maintenance Group (MXG) Commander. Nearly all of the organizational-
level maintenance capabilities moved from flying squadrons into aircraft maintenance units
(AMUs) in a single aircraft maintenance squadron (AMXS) under the MXG. The stated goals of
the CWO are to increase combat readiness rates and increase core competency skill levels in
response to a differing operating environment that has evolved into the [Expeditionary Air
Force] concept.12
People are undeniably the key element in the aircraft maintenance equation, and changes
in the size and nature of the force directly impact the maintenance environment. In 2005, aircraft
maintenance personnel accounted for over 20% of the active duty force.13 The Air Forces
planned drawdown of 141,708 active duty personnel (including 24,541 officers) through fiscal
year 2011 will increase our engrained challenge of making the most of limited resources and
place a greater emphasis on the skill of the remaining force.14
The nature of the officer corps has changed with the accession of the Generation X and
Generation Y populations. Born in the 1960s to late-1970s, Gen Xers began entering active
duty in the early to mid-1980s, and the GenYers, born roughly between the late-1970s to the
late-1990s began entering active duty in the early 1990s.15,16
The characteristics shared between
these two generations are markedly different than those of the Baby Boomers that shaped the
Air Force as we know it today. As such, their needs, drives, technological prowess, and general
4
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
8/53
outlook on social systems must be considered in force development efforts. Members of Gen X
and Gen Y are characterized as being more self-reliant and more reluctant to commit to
relationships than their Baby Boom predecessors. Likewise, they are unimpressed by authority
and have short attention spans, leading to a desire for flashy and interactive learning
experiences.17,18
While these traits allude to a strong, creative, and independent officer corps,
they also bring into question the effectiveness of training regimens that rely primarily on reading
and lecture.
The Air Forces weapons systems and support equipment are also key elements in the
aircraft maintenance environment. The steadily increasing average age of our aircraft fleet
continues to introduce challenges in greater proportions than ever before.19
More extensive
failures result in longer downtimes for inspection and repair, translating into fewer aircraft
available for supporting operations. Combating these problems requires innovation and leaders
willing to look past the way weve always done it mentality. Likewise, getting the last pennys
worth of investment in the operation and maintenance of this aging fleet requires exceptional
maintenance management and process improvement skills.
Implementation of the AEF
The phrase Every Airman a Deployer has come to characterize the new normal state
of operations in our Air Force. Under General Jumpers direction as CSAF, the number of
personnel made available for deployments increased from less than 100,000 to more than
338,800 to reduce the strain on the Air Forces small pool of deployers.20
As a result, more
maintenance officers deploy apart from their units into expeditionary combat support (ECS)
positions, like squadron commanders (Sq/CC) and maintenance operations officers (MOO), than
ever before. Maintenance officers in these ECS billets may find themselves supporting several
weapons systems at once, including some with which they have little or no experience.
5
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
9/53
Likewise, they are finding themselves leading units comprised of personnel from several bases,
major commands (MAJCOMs), and elements of the Total Force. In 2005, the 379 EAMX MOO
supported six different airframes with personnel from 19 bases and four MAJCOMS. The
379 AEWs C-130 aircraft maintenance unit (AMU) was the largest in the world, with 24 aircraft
of four varieties (C-130H1, H2, E, and J-models), and was made up of active duty and reserve
technicians from six bases and three MAJCOMs. Standardizing forms documentation alone took
the better part of a 4-month rotation, then came the massive swap-out of personnel as forces from
the next AEF came on line, and the learning curve started over. Therefore, maintenance officers
must be well-versed in Maintenance 101 to integrate effectively into one unit diverse weapons
systems and personnel from many bases and MAJCOMs, each with their own methods for
performing and documenting maintenance.21
Maintenance 101 refers to fundamental
maintenance tenets like technical data usage and maintenance safety.
The AMU is the Air Forces deployable combat maintenance unit. Under the Objective
Wing, a major or lieutenant colonel, known as the Squadron Maintenance Officer, led
maintenance personnel assigned to fighter squadrons, but the CWO now places a captain or
senior first lieutenant in charge of the same organization. The implication is clear: Smaller
numbers on the battlefield place a premium on leadership. Small-unit leaders must assume
responsibilities once the purview of officers with higher rank.22
More than ever before, junior
maintenance officers must be skilled leaders and strong maintenance managers.
The Core Competency of Agile Combat Support (ACS) fits hand-in-glove with the AEF in
creating a lighter, leaner, and more rapidly deployable force. AFDD 2-4 states, Every facet of
our service must be focused on providing what ultimately is combat support, whether it is better
educated warriors, better home-based support for members and their families, better methods to
manage our personnel system, or more efficient processes to conduct business.23
For
6
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
10/53
maintainers, ACS demands more effective training and improved maintenance management.
Maintenance Officer Skill Set Requirements
This description of the aircraft maintenance operating environment renders certain skill
sets that maintenance officers must master in the performance of their duties; specifically,
leadership, maintenance management, and technical expertise. Since people are the common
denominator in the maintenance calculus, leadership is the maintenance officers stock in trade.
From the moment maintenance officers report into their first duty assignment, they can find
themselves leading in excess of 100 maintenance technicians, armed with only the leadership
training provided by their commissioning source. Maintenance officers are expected to lead
often older and always more technically skilled personnel in maximizing support for unit goals.
Coupled with leadership is the ability to manage maintenance. By putting a maintenance
spin on definitions of management, the term maintenance management can be described as the
means by which limited resources are controlled to maximize efficiency and effectiveness in
performing a units activities. To be effective maintenance managers, maintenance officers must
be well-versed in the applicable Air Force Instructions (AFI), as well as being skilled in
statistical analysis and knowledgeable in both operations and maintenance scheduling processes.
A solid understanding of Maintenance 101 is also a prerequisite. According to the old adage
the only constant is change. However, positive change doesnt happen by accident, so change
management is also a critical skill. Change management takes process improvement to the next
level by considering the human, or leadership, elements involved.
Maintenance management is built upon a degree of technical expertise. While
maintenance officers are not technicians, they must understand what their technicians do and
7
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
11/53
how they do it to be able to effectively manage maintenance activities. Technical expertise
allows maintenance officers to verify the quality and safety of maintenance practices and
guarantee the quality of repairs. Technical expertise also forms a bridge with pilots and can help
overcome the communication gap created when maintainers were moved out of the flying
squadrons into the MXG as part of the CWO reorganization. Solid communication is vital to
customer support.
Maintenance officers must also be well-versed in the technical details of performing
maintenance to represent their units at higher echelons, like in the daily wing commanders
stand-up meeting, and effectively fight for limited resources in other squadron and MXG-level
meetings. It is a fact of life that maintenance technicians evaluate each other with respect to
technical and maintenance prowess, so it is natural for them to evaluate the effectiveness of
maintenance officers, to at least some degree, by the same yardstick. So, technical expertise is a
vital element of effective maintenance leadership, too.
With respect to skill sets and standards of competence, one author contends they should
reflect the high demands of combat and humanitarian operations with small logistical
footprints.24
This means maintenance officers must continually be able to make the most of
limited resources through a balance of solid leadership, exceptional maintenance management,
and sound technical expertise. A critical review of current maintenance officer education,
training, and development will determine if maintenance officers are adequately prepared to
meet this challenge.
8
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
12/53
Maintenance Officer Education, Training, and Experience
Education costs money, but then so does ignorance. -- Sir Claus Moser
Building a capable maintenance officer involves a blend of education, training, and
experience. Education forms the general foundation of knowledge and skills prerequisite for
service as a maintenance officer. Training provides specific knowledge and skills germane to the
trade, as well as the practice required to hone those skills. Experience develops maturity of
judgment and provides depth to training and education, as well as exposure to leadership role
models both good and bad.25
Maintenance Officer Education.
Education is a way to broaden an individuals experience base, which is limited to the
things theyve done, places theyve been and things theyve seen.26
Officers are educated
through undergraduate and advanced academic degrees (AAD), professional military education
(PME), and professional reading.
According to AFI 36-2105, Officer Classification, an undergraduate degree in
management, engineering, industrial management, business management, logistics management,
or physical sciences is preferred as a prerequisite to service as a maintenance officer.27
The Air
Force offers several ways to attain an advanced academic degree. In addition to earning an AAD
independently through a civilian institution, company grade officers can earn a masters degree
through the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT). Field grade officers can earn a masters
degree by attending one of the degree-offering service schools, through the competitive
Intermediate Developmental Education (IDE) and Senior Developmental (SDE) programs.
Professional Military Education is required at various points throughout an officers career to
develop expertise in leadership, military history, doctrine, and the conduct of war. Professional
9
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
13/53
reading adds both depth and breadth to the maintenance officers experience base.
Maintenance Officer Training.
Formal Maintenance Training. Mandatory basic and advanced maintenance courses
form the basis of aircraft maintenance officer formal training. The Aircraft Maintenance
Officers Course (AMOC) is the basic course. AMOC is a 10-week course required for all entry
level maintenance officers and is normally completed within the first year of duty. The course
topics are listed in Appendix B. The Maintenance Officer Intermediate Course (MOIC) is the
advanced course. All maintenance officers beginning with the 1997 year group must complete
MOIC prior to taking command. MOIC lasts 3 weeks and focuses on five key areas to include
wholesale logistics, deployment planning and execution, aircraft/munitions maintenance
management (including process improvement), and operations processes, programs, and
interfaces. MOIC course topics are listed in Appendix C.
There are other advanced training opportunities, but they are either limited in capacity,
highly selective, or targeted at certain grades and/or positions. The Advanced Maintenance and
Munitions Officers School (AMMOS), is the maintenance officers Air Force Weapons School
equivalent. Twelve competitively selected officers in each of three annual course offerings
complete an aggressive 14-week curriculum focused on readying the force, preparing the
battlespace, positioning the force, employing and sustaining the force, and recovering the force.
The AMMOS course topics are included in Appendix D.
Designed for senior leaders, the two additional advanced courses are the Senior Leaders
Maintenance Course (SLMC) and the Expeditionary Combat Support Executive Warrior Course
(AMWC). SLMC is a 2 to 3-day course taught at the MAJCOM-level, covering topics such as
aircraft status reporting, analysis, plans and scheduling, maintenance discipline, supply, financial
management, and manning and retention from the senior officers perspective. As an example
10
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
14/53
USAFEs SLMC agenda is included in Appendix E. During General Jumpers tenure as CSAF,
wing commanders and vice commanders, operations group commanders, MXG commanders,
and mission support group commanders were required to attend within 6 months of assuming
command. However, MXG/CCs are invited to SLMC primarily to provide practical expertise to
the course, as it was designed to educate other senior leaders on the maintenance organization.
So, SLMC is not commonly recognized as targeted training for MXG/CCs. AMWC targets
officers with the potential to serve as deployed A-4s, providing extensive expeditionary training
at the operational level of war and consists of three parts: a mentors bureau, a 1-week seminar,
and a quick reference handbook.
28
On-the-J ob Training (OJ T). Maintenance officer OJT began to take form during the
early 1990s through locally-developed Maintenance/Logistics Officer Orientation Training
Programs (MOOTP or LOOP), as directed by AFI 21-101, Aerospace Equipment Maintenance
Management. Due to the lack of a standard training plan, these programs tended to vary from
days to weeks in length. Moreover, as the level of emphasis on these courses varied between
Logistics Group Commanders, so did the content, interest, and participation. Some MOOTPs
and LOOPs were merely tours of the wings key agencies, while others involved spending more
time in some of the units to get a feel for their activities. Many of these programs required
officers to attend a week-long Field Training Detachment (FTD)-provided familiarization
(FAMS) course, which offers an in-depth study of the systems of the wings assigned aircraft.
In June 2004, aircraft maintenance officer OJT took a quantum leap forward with the
release of the 21A Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP). Like enlisted CFETPs
used effectively for years, the maintenance officer CFETP provides the framework and
guidance necessary for planning, developing, managing, and conducting a career field training
program, as well as documenting progression through the basic, senior, and master maintenance
11
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
15/53
officer certification levels.29
It involves a mix of training, education, and experience
requirements for progression through those levels. The training portion includes 269 tasks,
which vary from attending specific maintenance meetings, to performing maintenance tasks (like
an aircraft wash), and demonstrating knowledge of guidance found in key AFIs. Like enlisted
training, maintenance officer training is now managed by the MXG and squadron commanders
through the monthly Status of Training meeting. MOOTP/LOOPs have all but gone to the
wayside in favor of the more formalized CFETP program. In fact, the most recent version of
AFI 21-101 no longer directs MXGs to provide the program.
Technical expertise is a vital part of maintenance management, so it warrants some extra
discussion. AMOC teaches general information about airframes, propulsion, munitions and each
of the aircraft systems. While the AMOC curriculum effectively forges a standard knowledge
base for maintenance officers, it is not sufficient for understanding and managing the diverse
platforms encountered once at work back in their wings; nor is it intended to. Prior to the
CFETP coming on line, junior maintenance officers typically gained technical expertise while
assigned to maintenance flights, each focused on a particular system or function. However, they
only have the opportunity to serve in a few of the many flights before moving to the flightline or
a MOO job, so their learning was not complete. To compensate, the FTD-offered FAMS course
instructs students down to the schematic level in each system of their assigned aircraft, and the
CFETP directs hands-on training in many typical tasks across the maintenance organization.
Air Mobility Command (AMC) offers even greater opportunities to enhance maintenance
officer technical skills. Under AMCs Command Aircraft Systems Training (CAST) Program,
maintenance officers must complete career development course (CDC)-like modules on assigned
aircraft as part of the entry-level upgrade process. Likewise, officers are encouraged to complete
the corresponding CAST module each time they change aircraft types to increase their
12
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
16/53
effectiveness. In addition, AMC offers maintenance officers the opportunity to attend the
aircraft systems portion of flying training at the flying training unit (FTU) for each of AMCs
aircraft types. These courses range from 3 to 5 weeks in length and offer maintenance officers a
valuable opportunity to gain insight into the operators environment, while gaining technical
expertise and developing relationships that enhance support in the field.
Continuation Training (CT) and Career Broadening. According to doctrine, CT
maintains and refines skills necessary to keep Airmen ready to perform the mission.30
There is a
whole host of CT courses available to help maintenance officers keep the combat edge. AFIT
and the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) provide the majority of these courses for officers
Air Force-wide, and the MAJCOMs offer a few CT courses as well. AFIT courses, offered at a
variety of locations, cover topics ranging from in-garrison and deployed logistics to maintenance
management for entry-level through senior maintainers.31
DAU courses, offered on-line and at
various locations, focus on acquisitions logistics and other topics like performance based
logistics, configuration management, reliability and maintainability, and LEAN concepts.32
In addition to AFIT and DAU, several MAJCOMs offer CT courses. Air Combat
Command (ACC) offers a Combat Wing Maintenance Officers Course (CWMOC) and a
Flightline Maintenance Officers Course (FLMOC). The 4-day CWMOC consists of a series of
briefings covering personnel and manning issues, officer development, supply, analysis and
maintenance performance indicators, enlisted maintenance training, scheduling, and the flying
hour program. The 5-day FLMOC provides valuable information needed by maintenance officers
to more effectively manage a flight line under a decentralized concept. The curriculum includes:
leadership and organizational structure, aircraft scheduling and status reporting, disaster
preparedness, aircraft maintenance processes, and supply concepts. AMCs Wing Maintenance
Course (WMC) takes the topics taught in SLMC to the Sq/CC and MOO level. This course
13
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
17/53
addresses issues associated with the CWO, maintenance and supply fundamentals, maintenance
performance evaluation, and fleet and resource management. Finally, USAFE offers a Squadron
Commanders Maintenance Course (SCMC). This 2-day course is highly encouraged for all
USAFE Sq/CCs regardless of career field, briefly touching on most of the topics covered in
ACCs CWMO Course and AMCs WMC.
Maintenance Resources. Several resources are available to maintenance officers to aid
in the performance of their duties. Chief among them are the various 21-series maintenance
AFIs, with AFI 21-101, Aerospace Equipment Maintenance Management, commonly recognized
as The Maintenance Bible. It outlines the responsibilities of wing leadership and every major
position, function, unit, and process in the MXG. Each MAJCOM and wing has a supplement to
this AFI, and a CENTAF supplement is in draft. In support of wing-level maintenance,
AMMOS developed Aircraft Maintenance Tactics, Techniques and Procedures. This 178-page
book provides detailed information regarding major aircraft maintenance processes and
functions. Finally, the Air Force Logistics Management Agency (AFLMA) published a
Maintenance Metrics Handbook to provide maintenance leaders at both the wing and
MAJCOM-level with a comprehensive guide to metrics associated with maintenance
management.33
All of these products are available in electronic format to facilitate
dissemination.
Maintenance Officer Experience.
The assignment process, aided by the 21XX Air Force Specialty Code Aircraft/Munitions
Maintenance Officer (21A/M) Development Team (DT), develops maintenance officers by
varying experiences and increasing levels of responsibility from one assignment to the next.
Created in 2003, the core of the 21A/M DT is comprised of colonels from each MAJCOM to
enhance field grade maintenance officer development by recommending career paths or
14
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
18/53
vectors. Recently, the 21A/M DT has taken on the added responsibility of selecting the pool
of officers eligible to command maintenance squadrons and recommends officers for in-
residence IDE and SDE.34
The 21A/M Assignment Team uses the 21A/M DTs vector when
matching officers to jobs during the assignment process. Job progression within a maintenance
officers tour of duty falls under the purview of the officers MXG/CC.
In addition to the depth provided by progressive assignments within the career field,
maintenance officers can add breadth to their experience base through several career broadening
opportunities. Key among them are the Air Force Intern Program (AFIP), the Logistics Career
Broadening Program (LCBP), and the Acquisitions and Logistics Experience Exchange Tour
(ALEET). Additionally, a handful of maintenance officers can crossflow into munitions/missile
maintenance and logistics readiness officer career fields each year. All career broadeners are
competitively selected, and descriptions of each career broadening program are provided in
Appendix F.
The 21A Career Pyramid in Figure 1 serves as guidance for the DT and assignment
managers as to the type and level of experience maintenance officers should gain at each point in
their career.35
The Maintenance Officer Certification chart from the 21A CFETP (see Appendix
G) provides a tabular representation of this information, and is broken down by education,
training, and experience requirements for each level of certification.
15
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
19/53
Figure 1: The 21A Career Pyramid
Training Initiatives and Innovations.
Several budding initiatives and innovations in training and training management could
have a profound impact on aircraft maintenance officer development in the future. The first
initiative, AF/A4Ms 21A/M Credentialing Program, links certification levels to key duty
positions and establishes experience requirements for those positions. The certifications have
three dimensions: operational maintenance, depot maintenance and product support (acquisitions
and sustainment). This initiative builds on the education, training, and experience levels outlined
in the 21A CFETP and is beneficial in at least two ways. It encourages career-long professional
development if officers aspire to hold certain positions, and it ensures officers in certain
positions are qualified to perform the required duties.36
The next two initiatives enhance expertise by leveraging existing resources. The first of
these involves using AMMOS graduates to teach advanced concepts within wing-level
16
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
20/53
organizations, a long-standing expectation of all Air Force Weapons School graduates. Even
though AMMOS grads receive instructor training as part of the AMMOS curriculum, they have
yet to be used in this capacity in a widespread manner. The notable exceptions are the 552 MXG
at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, and the 33 MXG at Eglin AFB, Florida. The 552 MXG has the more
robust program of the two, where MXG leadership directed resident AMMOS grads to develop
and teach a 15 module program to all assigned maintenance officers. In the 33 MXG, AMMOS
grads lead a Maintenance Tactics portion of the weekly MXG Roll Calls, following the
tradition of talking tactics during fighter squadron roll calls.
In Defense Logistics for the 21st Century, General William Tuttle (US Army, retired)
contends customer awareness is one of the most important abilities logistics (including
maintenance) officers can develop. He goes on to say, the best way to acquire the customers
perspective is to have experienced it.37
Such experience yields an acute appreciation of the
customers needs, especially the value of timely delivery of support; it also gives the logisitician
far more credibility in dealings with combat organization leaders.38
Recognizing these facts,
the 33 MXG crafted an Ops/Maintenance Exchange Program to bridge the rift resulting from the
CWO-driven realignment of on-equipment maintenance. During each exchange, maintenance
officers tour every aspect of fighter squadron operations, culminating in an F-15 familiarization
ride, when possible. As a result, key maintenance managers, no longer embedded in fighter
squadrons, get an insiders view of their customers environment, needs and perceptions.
Likewise, up to 10 pilots from each fighter squadron spend a day touring each of the
maintenance squadrons and a another full day with their assigned AMU. Pilots get a detailed
look at enlisted training, the maintenance scheduling process, and flightline operations from the
maintainers perspective. The dialog shared and understanding gained truly improved the ops-
maintenance relationship in the 33 FW.39
17
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
21/53
The last two innovations serve as force multipliers with respect to the time and money
invested in training. Computer-based training (CBT) has increased rapidly in recent years and is
well-integrated into enlisted maintenance training regimens. The use of CBT increases training
opportunities and decreases student travel costs, as well as the need for a standing cadre of
instructors. Most Air Force members have already experienced CBT through computer security
and anti-terrorism training. Course content changes are made at one central location and are
rapidly disseminated to the field. Moreover, students can take the training at times and locations
that fit into demanding work schedules. The Acquisition Professional Development Program
(APDP) has made extensive use of CBT, and is the benchmark for efforts in this area.
Communities of Practice (CoP) have boomed in recent years in the civilian sector, and
are just beginning to take hold within the Air Force. CoPs are normally on-line groups of people
who share the same profession, situation, or vocation. These communities facilitate professional
exchange, allow members to establish a bond of common experience, and enhance efficiency and
effectiveness in operations by building a robust network for solving problems. The Armys
Company Command CoP is the most celebrated example of a military CoP. Started as a .com
website by a handful of company commanders, it was adopted by the US Army and has spurred
the development of similar forums for other levels of Army leadership.40
In academic year 2006,
ACSC created a research seminar for the sole purpose of creating a Squadron Commanders
CoP. Later this year, each sitting Sq/CC and officers selected for command will receive an email
inviting them to join the CoP, where they can contribute to forums in several topical areas
relating to squadron command. Air War College has also begun work on a CoP for group
commanders, and logistics readiness officers are already enjoying the benefits of their CoP.
18
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
22/53
7 Donalad H. Rumsfeld, Quadrennial Defense Review(Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 6 February 2006),v.
8Air & Space Expeditionary Course. (5 December 2005).
9 Maj Gen Stephen Lorenz, US Air Force FY06 Budget Rollout (briefing, Pentagon, Washington DC, 6 February
2006), slide 4.10
David George, Maintenance Organization: An Historical Perspective, Air Force Journal of Logistics 28, no .4(Winter 2004): 34-39.
11 Capt James Upchurch, Loggies Opinions on the New Combat Wing Organization, The Exceptional Release
(Winter/Spring 2004): 6.12 Ibid, 7.13 Christa DAndrea, Career Fields, Airman: The Book (2006): 58-59.14 Lt Gen Roger Brady, Building the 21st Century Air Force (briefing, Pentagon, Washington DC, 4 April 2006),
slide 8.15 Wikipedia, s.v. Generation X, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X(accessed 6 December 2005).16 Wikipedia, s.v. Generation Y,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Y (accessed 6 December 2005).17 Capt Alisen Iverson, Professional Military Education for Company Grade Officers, Air Force Journal of
Logistics 25, no. 2 (Summer 2001): 60.18 Leonard Wong, Generations Apart: Xers and Boomers in the Officers Corps,The Art of Military Leadership
Course 1 Academic Year 2006 Coursebook. (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air Command and Staff College, August2005), 153-156.19 William P. Hallin, The Challenge of Sustaining Older Aircraft, Air Force Journal of Logistics 22 no. 2
(Summer 1988): 3.20
Richard V. Reynolds, ASC/CC Call (briefing, Wright-Patterson AFB, AL, 25 June 2002), slide 25.21 The author was the 379 EAMXS MOO during the timeframe described.22 Williamson Murray and Robert H. Scales,The Iraq War (Cambridge: The Belknap Press, 2003), 249.23 AFDD 1, Basic Air Force Doctrine, 17 November 2003, 82.24 William G. T. Tuttle, Defense Logistics for the 21st Century (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2005), 295.25 Col Dennis M. Drew, Educating Air Force Officers, (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University archives, 1997),
http://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.html, accessed 20 December 2005.26 Ibid.27 AFI 36-2105, Officer Classification, 31 October 2004, 156.28 Lisa. Hess, Expeditionary Leader Development, Air Force Journal of Logistics 27, no. 2 (Summer 2003): 40.29 Career Field Education and Training Plan 21AX, Aircraft Maintenance Officer, June 2004, 1.30 AFDD 2-4.3, Education and Training, 9 September 1998, 23.31 Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), AFIT School of Systems and Logistics Course List,
http://www.afit.edu/ls/courselist.cfm, accessed 10 December 2005.32
Bill Kobren, Defense Acquisition University: Life Cycle Logistics for the 21st Century, The Exceptional
Release (Spring 2005): 14.33 Air Force Logistics Management Agency (AFLMA), Maintenance Metrics Handbook, AFLMA (2001).34 Bruce D. Callender, Force Development Hits Its Stride, Air Force Magazine 88, no. 10,
http://www.afa.org/magazine/Oct2005/1005forcedev.asp, accessed 7 December 2005.35 Air Force Personnel Center, Officer Development: 2X (Core AFSC) Series,
http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/Docs/DPA/ForceMgmt/CPDs/21AMRCPDs(Fall%2005).ppt, accessed 25
November 2005.36 AF/A4Q, 21A/M Credentialing Working Group (briefing, Pentagon, Washington DC, 2 December 2005), slide
3.37 William G. T. Tuttle, Defense Logistics for the 21st Century. (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2005), 295.38 Ibid.39 Robert A. Sanford (33d Maintenance Group Deputy Commander), interviewed by author, 10 December 2005.40 US Army, Companycommand.com website, http://companycommand.army.mil, accessed 5 December 2005.
19
http://%3Chttp//www.apc.maxwell.af.mil/launch.htm?aef%3Ehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Xhttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttp://www.afit.edu/ls/courselist.cfmhttp://www.afa.org/magazine/Oct2005/1005forcedev.asphttp://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/Docs/DPA/ForceMgmt/CPDs/21AMRCPDs(Fall%2005).ppthttp://companycommand.army.mil/http://companycommand.army.mil/http://ask.afpc.randolph.af.mil/Docs/DPA/ForceMgmt/CPDs/21AMRCPDs(Fall%2005).ppthttp://www.afa.org/magazine/Oct2005/1005forcedev.asphttp://www.afit.edu/ls/courselist.cfmhttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Xhttp://%3Chttp//www.apc.maxwell.af.mil/launch.htm?aef%3E -
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
23/53
ANALYSIS
The critical review of current maintenance officer education, training, and experience
surfaced certain incongruities and shortfalls. To begin, each of the undergraduate degrees listed
in AFI 36-2105 as prerequisites to assignment as a maintenance officer involve some degree of
study in statistics, analysis, and problem solving, but each has a different slant on those tools,
and none are guaranteed to complement the craft of maintenance management. Furthermore, the
degrees listed are desirable, and not exclusively required for service as a maintenance officer.
The result is the lack of a pure common educational denominator for maintenance officers,
placing a greater emphasis on training.
In spite of the many courses available to meet maintenance officer developmental needs, the
training regimen is not optimized. First, maintenance officer continuation training is not
standardized across the Air Force, as some valuable courses and programs are offered in only
one or two MAJCOMS. Table 1 shows the positions in wing-level maintenance organizations
targeted by MAJCOM-offered courses.
Table 1: MAJ COM-Offered Continuation Training Courses
ACC AMC USAFE PACAF AFSOC AFMC AETC
DutyPosition
FlightlineOfficers
Course
CWMOCourse
WingMx
Course
SCMC
Flt/CC X X
AMU/OIC X X
MOO X X
Sq/CC X X
It is clear that the MAJCOMs providing maintenance officer continuation training have
different priorities for key positions, while some offer none at all. Of those MAJCOMs who do
not provide continuation training, only AFMC has made it a policy to send maintenance officers
to ACC-sponsored courses rather than incurring the cost of hosting their own. The basic and
20
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
24/53
advanced maintenance courses (AMOC and MOIC) are not robust enough to preclude the need
for additional training throughout a maintenance officers career, nor should they be when
concept of career-long learning. While the MAJCOMs have developed courses that complement
AMOC and MOIC by building specific skills in certain positions, those courses are neither
mandatory nor offered Air Force-wide.
Next, while MIOC is a robust course, it may be targeted at the wrong audience. MOIC
was created, in part, to prepare company grade officers to serve as MOOs. Since most MOO
positions are major billets, the junior captains attending MOIC may not require all of its content
for their current jobs. While some senior captains may serve as MOOs due to field grade officer
shortages, very few maintenance officers will be MOOs at the 6-year point when they attend
MOIC. Moreover, most current MOOs are grandfathered from attending the course, and cannot
gain from the training targeted for their job. Maintenance officers should receive training for the
jobs they are in, not jobs they will hold several years in the future.
Finally, CBT is an untapped resource for efficiently and effectively training maintenance
officers. Currently, every maintenance officer training course is classroom-based, driving time
away from the job and large O&M bills for travel. Any course content not requiring interaction
with instructors could be built into CBT modules for maintenance officers to complete in the
field. CBT is just the sort of flashy media that appeals to Gen X/Y officers. Classroom-based
courses should be limited to those where interaction with the instructor and/or fellow students is
vital to learning the course material. Learning maintenance management skills like statistical
analysis and scheduling are examples of skill sets requiring face-to-face instruction, practice and
real-time feedback. Arguably, one of the best aspects of attending off-station courses is
interaction with other maintenance officers, where they share experiences and form networks. It
is impossible to place a value on this collaboration, but professional forums like the Logistics
21
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
25/53
Officer Associations (LOA) annual convention, CoPs, and attending courses where interaction
with the instructors is vital to learning provide such opportunities.
In addition to problems with the continuity, focus, and delivery of current maintenance
officer training, there are several gaps in the regimen. The first three relate to certain duty
positions. Maintenance officers serving as flight commanders, AMU officers in charge (OIC),
and their assistants; MOOs; and Sq/CCs do not receive any sort of standardized training across
the MAJCOMs. Though several DAU or AFIT courses target officers in these positions,
attendance is not required, and course content does not focus specifically on those positions.
Flight commanders are the frontline maintenance managers and change agents in Maintenance
Squadrons (including Equipment Maintenance Squadrons and Component Maintenance
Squadrons). Yet, until the 6 to 7-year point when they attend MOIC, their only guaranteed
training is AMOC and the 21A CFETP. Therefore, they can spend up to the first third of their
careers, and arguably half of their total field-level maintenance time, without formal training in
maintenance and change management.
Additionally, standardized training for MOOs does not exist. Many sitting MOOs were
grandfathered from attending MOIC, and by the time those who have attended become MOOs,
their training will have been 2-4 years dated. ACCs CWMOC is a good initiative, but it consists
of a weeks worth of briefings in various subject matters and functional areas, and does not offer
any practical maintenance or change management training. Many maintenance officers will
move to the MOO immediately after serving as a flight commander or AMU OIC and will be up-
to-date in current practices and policies. However, operations at the MOO-level begin to take on
an operational (versus tactical) nature and require training and education to perform effectively
at that level. Other maintenance officers will be transferred into a MOO job from depot, staff or
career broadening tours, and will require some training in the current maintenance environment
22
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
26/53
to perform effectively in the position.
The advanced training course in other career fields, like logistics readiness officers,
communications officers, and space professionals, targets officers serving in positions filled by
majors, like the aircraft maintenance MOO job. Those intensive courses last from 3-5 weeks,
and some have pre-arrival reading requirements. They focus on the operational level of leading
and managing in their respective career fields, and use the opportunity to hone key skill sets with
instruction, practical exercises, evaluation, and feedback. For maintenance officers, the
questions arise: Is MOIC targeting the right audience or should it become a course for MOOs?
Likewise, if MOIC is currently on-target for company grade officers, does the Air Force need an
additional MOO course?
Finally, Sq/CCs can transfer in from other wings, or just as likely from depot, staff, IDE,
or career broadening tours. Moreover, they may be career mobility air forces (MAF)
maintainers, assigned to the combat air forces (CAF) for the first time, and vice versa. Like
some MOOs, many Sq/CCs will require some training in the current maintenance environment
and maintenance management practices. Furthermore, they too, will need some guidance on
operating at this new level of maintenance leadership.
The next three training gaps are related to maintenance officer skill sets; specifically,
technical, maintenance management, and change management expertise. While change
management, or process improvement in the simplest sense, is a truly part of maintenance
management, it is important enough to warrant its own discussion.
Technical expertise
A maintenance officers first encounter with maintenance activities comes during AMOC
where he or she learns each of the aircraft systems in general terms, then practice some aspects
of maintaining aircraft by making trainer aircraft safe for maintenance and even changing some
23
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
27/53
parts using technical data. Once in the field, maintenance officers are required to perform a
variety of tasks, like refueling an aircraft, as part of completing the 21A CFETP. However,
completing the tasks outlined in the 21A CFETP is a one-time requirement and is not repeated
each time a maintenance officer is assigned to a new weapon system. The FTD FAMS courses
effectively build on the general systems information taught at AMOC, but attending a FAMS
course is not required in the current training regimen. In fact, according to historical data on
officer-level FAMS course offerings Air Force-wide, only about 90 officers attend FAMS
courses each year.41
AMCs CAST program is an excellent vehicle for increasing maintenance officer
technical expertise. It ensures officers closest to the maintenance activities learn the systems and
operating characteristics of their assigned aircraft as part of upgrade training. Though
completing CAST modules is optional as officers progress above the basic certification level, the
CAST course books are available on-line, serving as excellent reference materials. Furthermore,
the opportunity for AMC-assigned maintenance officers to attend pilot FTUs for systems training
is a great way to increase technical expertise. However only a handful of the available slots have
been used in the last several years.42
In summary, while AMOC offers excellent general education in aircraft systems, it does
not create maintenance officers technically proficient on their assigned aircraft. Likewise, the
21A CFETP allows maintenance officers to perform some tasks to gain an understanding of the
maintenance environment, but it is not enough to develop the expertise required to manage
maintenance effectively. Furthermore, AMC offers some promising solutions to the problem,
but its programs are not offered for all airframes Air Force-wide, specifically for fighters,
bombers, and reconnaissance aircraft, or helicopters.
24
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
28/53
Maintenance Management.
Managing maintenance, along with leading people, is the reason maintenance officers
exist. Nearly every maintenance activity is governed by a process, and most processes have a
standard. With respect to performance, the truth is in the numbers assuming the data is good.
From the earliest point in their careers, maintenance officers should be able to enter an
organization, determine its key processes, identify the standard of performance for each, and
affect change where required. While AMOC briefs the existence and importance of the
maintenance performance indicators, it does not teach the skills required to manage performance,
like statistical analysis and process improvement. In fact, MOIC is the first Air Force-directed
course that teaches maintenance management to junior maintenance officers.
While AFLMAs Maintenance Metrics Handbook and the AMMOS-developed TTPs are
great maintenance management resources, but they are not widely publicized or used on a daily
basis. In essence, those two documents should be placed next to AFI 21-101, within arms reach
of every wing-level maintenance officer, and referred to routinely.
Change Management
In the early 1990s, Air Force senior leaders institutionalized Total Quality Management
in the form of Quality Air Force (QAF). QAF tools and techniques were taught to the lowest
level of maintenance manager, including goal setting as well as the use of metrics to manage
resources at the unit level and processes at the shop level. Few will disagree that many took
QAF too far, often spending more time setting goals and tracking metrics, than actually fixing or
improving things. But when the Air Force abandoned QAF, it may have thrown the baby out
with the bath water. With few exceptions, we have nearly abandoned formal goal setting and the
majority of metrics tracked are those required by AFIs and higher headquarters. It is time to
revitalize that form of maintenance management training.
25
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
29/53
That revitalization is beginning to take hold in the form of LEAN. LEAN, a well-
established best business practice for process improvement, is part of the senior leaders lexicon.
Furthermore, Secretary of the Air Force Wynne listed Fostering LEAN Processes Across the
Total Air Force as one of seven Air Force goals.43
LEAN has already been successfully implemented in AFMCs depots, exemplified by the
fact that three depots won a Gold and two Silver-level Shingo Prizes for Excellence in
Manufacturing in 2005 after successfully implementing LEAN principles. The Shingo Prize
recognizes organizations which promote world-class manufacturing strategies and practices to
achieve world class results.
44
Recognizing that LEAN is only sporadically implemented at the wing-level, where the
rising O&M costs of our aging aircraft fleet demand ever-more efficient use of resources,
Secretary Wynne directed commanders to take LEAN beyond the depots to the flightline.45
In
response, the Air Staff has initiated the Air Force Smart Operations for the 21st Century
(AFSO21) initiative. Like QAF was to TQM, AFSO21 is the Air Forces vehicle for
institutionalizing LEAN management processes. The Air Force Portal is host to the AFSO21
CoP, which provides guidance, resources and contacts for LEAN information. Currently, DAU
offers two CBT courses on LEAN and they are described in Appendix H.46
The last two training gaps are topic-specific: training for deployed operations and
professional reading. WWI French Field Marshall Fouch held that, No study is possible on the
battlefield, but few will argue the fact that the combat environment is one of the best
schoolhouses. Arguably, maintenance officers gain years of experience during the span of just a
few months in the fight. Learning curves in the deployed environment are steep because most
rotations are only 4 months in duration, and the rapid pace of deployed operations demands it.
Rather than deploying to well-established bases like Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, more and more
26
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
30/53
maintenance officers are being deployed to small, austere bases stood up to meet the contingency
at hand. As such, there are fewer resources and numbers of senior, experienced maintenance
officers at each base. So, junior maintenance officers must have a firm grasp of certain processes
unique to the deployed environment, like air tasking order development and execution; the
deployed chain of command, including CENTAF/A4 forward and rear; reachback with home
units, MAJCOMs, system program offices (SPO), depots and the like; Centralized Intermediate
Repair (CIRF) concepts; and deployed supply processes. Pilots are required to participate with
joint and coalition partners in a Flag exercise during their AEF spin-up period to prepare for
combat ops. The most common examples are Red Flag at Nellis AFB and Maple Flag at Cold
Lake, Canada. However, no such pre-deployment training requirement exists for maintenance
officers.
Currently, professional reading is not a formal part of maintenance officer training and
professional development. After serving 20 years of active duty and civil service in various
positions with the Air University, a retired colonel penned, Air Force efforts to promote
informal, personal, career-long professional development [through reading] have been very
limited and largely ineffective.47
Professional journals, like The Air Force Journal of Logistics,
the LOAs Exceptional Release magazine, and The Air and Space Power Journal, are well-
distributed to wing-level organizations and archives are available on line. However, professional
reading lists, like the CSAF Reading List and AFITs Logistics Reading List, are not widely
publicized except during in-residence PME and while attending AFIT.48
Moreover, there is
neither a strong push for professional reading, nor a means to reinforce the practice.49
If the
adage leaders are readers holds true, then the professional reading should be formalized,
encouraged, and reinforced.
27
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
31/53
41 Richard F. Flammond, (372d Training Squadron, Director of Operations), interviewed by author, 8 February
2006.42 Cynthia Clark, (HQ Air Mobility Command Directorate of Logistics, Maintenance Training Manager),
interviewed by author, 15 February 2006.43 Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Air Force, Letter to Airmen, 3 November 2005.44
A. K. Lopez, Shingo: Air Logistics Centers Garner Prize, Leading Edge Magazine, (Winter 2005): 10.45 Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Air Force, Letter to Airmen, 6 December 2005.46
Defense Acquisition University (DAU), DAU Virtual Campus Course List,https://learn.dau.mil/html/clc/Clc.jsp, accessed 20 November 2005.
47 Col Dennis M. Drew, Educating Air Force Officers, (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University archives, 1997),http://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.html, accessed 20 December 2005.48 AFIT, Logistics Reading List, http://www.afit.edu/ls/readinglist.cfm, accessed 10 December 2005.49 Col Dennis M. Drew, Educating Air Force Officers, (Maxwell AFB, AL: Air University archives, 1997),
http://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.html, accessed 20 December 2005.
28
https://learn.dau.mil/html/clc/Clc.jsphttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttp://www.afit.edu/ls/readinglist.cfmhttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttp://www.afit.edu/ls/readinglist.cfmhttp://airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicals/apj/apj97/sum97/drew.htmlhttps://learn.dau.mil/html/clc/Clc.jsp -
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
32/53
RECOMMENDATIONSA smaller force structure combined with an accelerating pace of change requires some proactivethinking about leadership development. General Michael E. Ryan, CSAF, 1997-2001
The analysis of maintenance officer training highlights a number of things that can be
done to improve the expertise of aircraft maintenance officers, but not all of them should be
done. While training can be a force enabler, too much training can actually be counterproductive
due to the time spent away from the job to complete it. For instance, the Air Force could create
an Aircraft Maintenance Professional Development Program (AMPDP) like the acquisition
corps APDP. An AMPDP would surely increase expertise in certain skill sets germane to the
profession by offering certifications in areas such as change management (to include LEAN) and
maintenance management. However, such a program could require a good deal of time to
complete the courses required for certifications, and the desired level of expertise in those areas
can be developed effectively through just a few one-time mandatory courses well-timed
throughout a maintenance officers career.
Likewise, it is essential that maintenance officer training incorporate the latest
technologies in distance learning, like the CBT modules so richly developed for DAUs APDP.
CBT is well-suited for todays Gen X and Gen Y maintenance officer, and the benefits of
reduced operations and maintenance costs are too great to overlook. While CBT can be an
effective means of increasing knowledge in specific areas, many agencies are realizing this and
have developed CBT course of their own. In addition to the computer security and anti-
terrorism CBTs previously mentioned, maintenance officers are required to complete a NATO
security CBT, a file management CBT, and the list goes on. So, CBT should not be seen as a
panacea for improving maintenance officer training, as officers in the field can quickly become
overwhelmed. Maintenance officer CBT courses should be developed with care to ensure only
29
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
33/53
those absolutely needed are added to the growing list of required CBT.
Even in light of those things that should not be done (or overdone), the analysis of
maintenance officer training drove several value-added recommendations. First, the Air Force
should complete and implement AF/A4Ms 21A Credentialing Program as soon as possible to
establish skill set prerequisites for key positions in the maintenance field units and staff agencies.
It will guide individual officers, the 21A/M DT, and the 21A Assignment Team in ensuring
officers get the right training, education, and experience at the right time in their careers as they
progress to higher levels of leadership. Further, it will ensure only the most qualified officers fill
key maintenance leadership and staff positions. Defining skill set requirements for key
maintenance leadership and staff positions will also focus training efforts by ensuring courses
exist to develop those skills. Moreover, courses or course material not directly traced to a
required skill set could easily be identified for elimination. In essence, divest to reinvest.
Two steps should be taken to increase maintenance management expertise. First, a block
on maintenance management should be added to AMOC. Since maintenance management is the
primary responsibility of wing-level maintenance officers, it should be taught along with other
topics basic to service in the profession. This block should develop basic skills in statistical
analysis and metrics management. Second, maintenance management courses should be
standardized across the MAJCOMs, targeted to three levels of maintenance leadership: flight
commanders, AMU OICs and assistants; MOOs; and Sq/CCs.
Table 2 compares the current maintenance officer basic and advance training courses
with the proposed maintenance officer training continuum.
30
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
34/53
Table 2: Notional Maintenance Officer Training Continuum
MOIC should be slimmed-down to last about 2 weeks and redesigned to cover just those
topics needed by flight commanders, AMU OICs, and their assitants. It should target officers
with 2-5 years of service in maintenance and focus on the tactical level of maintenance
management and sortie generation by addressing topics like aircraft scheduling, statistical
analysis and metrics management, and process improvement. Many of the topics currently
taught in MOIC are salient for company grade maintenance officers and should be used as the
foundation for the new MOIC. The new MOIC should taught at the MAJCOM-level to spread
the training burden across the Air Force and allow the MAJCOMs to inject information unique to
maintenance officers in their command. The MAJCOMs could also agree to centralize MOIC
training between them to increase the efficiency of limited training resources. For example,
MAJCOMs with a small number of flying wings, like AETC and AFMC, could send
maintenance officers assigned to fighter units to ACCs MOIC, and maintenance officers
assigned to heavy aircraft units to AMCs course. This would also allow maintenance officers to
build networks and share experiences with other maintenance officers supporting similar
airframes.
A Maintenance Officers Advanced Course (MOAC) should be developed for sitting
MOOs as the aircraft maintenance officers true advanced course. It should be an intense and
rigorous course, like the advanced course for communications and logistics readiness officers,
where maintenance management is taught with a squadron or operational perspective. Some
31
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
35/53
topics could include functions of air logistic centers and SPOs, synergizing the capabilities of
assigned AMUs, enhanced maintenance/metrics management and change management skills, as
well as mid- to long-term maintenance scheduling and flying hour program development. In
addition, the MOO course should include elements of ACCs In-Garrison Commanders Course
to ensure MOOs are prepared to serve as commanders when their Sq/CCs are out-of-pocket for
extended periods, such as AEF deployments. If MOIC is taught at the MAJCOM level, as
recommended above, then the current cadre of MOIC instructors at Sheppard AFB, Texas, would
be made available to teach MOAC centrally for all Air Force maintenance officers.
Finally, a 2-3 day Maintenance Sq/CC Course should be developed to prepare new
maintenance Sq/CCs to serve at the higher level of maintenance leadership by slewing their
focus from managing maintenance to managing maintenance resources and personnel. This
course should be tagged on to the end of the Sq/CC Course currently taught at (and required by)
all MAJCOMs for Sq/CCs prior to taking command. The Maintenance Sq/CC Course could be
made optional for commanders of all other types of squadrons to enhance support for flying and
maintenance operations.
The training continuum proposed in Table 2 would ensure maintenance officers receive
the same type of maintenance management training while in key positions, regardless of the
MAJCOM in which they are assigned. In addition, it would preclude the need for stand-alone
MAJCOM-offered courses like ACCs FLMOC and CWMOC, as well as AMCs Wing
Maintenance Course.
In addition, there are a few actions the Air Force should take to increase maintenance
officer technical expertise. First, AMCs CAST program should be taken AF-wide to encompass
all fixed-wing and helicopter aircraft types. Next, the FTD-offered FAMS course should be
made a mandatory part of the 21A CFETP basic certification requirements, and for officers
32
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
36/53
assigned to an MDS for the first time in subsequent assignments. This would complement the
self-paced CAST program by allowing maintenance officers the opportunity to interact with
experienced instructor-technicians in learning aircraft systems. Finally, the FTU for each aircraft
type should make a few seats available for AMU OICs and MOOs to attend the aircraft systems
block of their assigned aicraft. While it is not practical to send every AMU OIC and MOO to an
FTU, at least several each year would gain more enhanced technical expertise, as well as an
appreciation for the operators perspective on system operations. While these steps would
increase maintenance management effectiveness, they would not (and should not) develop
technical skill levels comparable to maintenance technicians.
A template for an Ops/Maintenance Exchange Program, like that of the 33 MXG, should
be crafted and directed for implementation in every flying wing. The insight gained, networks
formed, and communication shared by all participating officers will have a profound impact on
the ops-maintenance relationship and mission success. Moreover, the Air Force should
formalize the AMMOS graduates role as an instructor, by having them teach advanced AEF-
related concepts in their assigned wing, as is done in the 552 MXG.
A pre-deployment CBT course should be developed and made mandatory for all
deploying maintenance officers. It should include topics such as the deployed chain of
command, reachback with key organizations, CIRF operations, and deployed supply processes.
It could provide links to applicable regional combatant command instructions, guidance and
websites, as well as links to information on the culture in various regions. Moreover, it should
address the complexity of operations where people and aircraft from several bases, commands,
and components of the Total Force are combined into the same organization.
LEAN training should be made available and mandatory for wing-level maintenance
officers as soon as possible. AF/A4M AFSO21 experts should determine if DAUs LEAN CBT
33
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
37/53
courses meet the need. If so, they should be integrated into the 21A CFETP. If not, a CBT
module should be developed for field-level maintenance organizations. In addition, the AFSO21
CoP should serve as a repository for successful LEAN initiatives to enhance crosstell and spur
Air Force-wide implementation of best practices.
Professional reading offers great potential in developing the maintenance officer corps.
Senior leaders, and other entities like the 21A/M DT, the AMMOS cadre, and AFIT, should use
AFITs Logistics Reading List as a basis for developing an AF/A4 Logistics Reading list. It
should be publicized Air Force-wide through the MXG Commanders Conference, LOAs
website, during formal training, and other professional forums. Moreover, it should be codified
into maintenance officer professional development through the 21A CFETP.
Finally, an Aircraft Maintenance CoP should be developed to link professionals at all
levels of maintenance leadership. CoPs are exceptional peer-mentoring aids and they build large
brain trusts for solving day-to-day problems and enhancing operations. Areas could be
dedicated in the CoP for each level of maintenance leadership, such as flight commander, AMU
OIC, MOO, Sq/CC and MXG/CC, as well as for each aircraft type. A maintenance officer CoP
could also include reading lists and links to various resources. Several organizations could
effectively manage the CoP, including AFLMA, the AMMOS or AMOC schoolhouses, and
LOA.
34
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
38/53
CONCLUSION
The level of importance placed on aircraft maintenance by senior leaders, along with
problems discovered in the CLR, drove a fresh look at the maintenance officer training regimen.
Moreover, changes in the national security and maintenance operating environments created the
need to ensure maintenance officers have the skill sets required to perform effectively. In
addition, recent changes in aircraft maintenance officer training and development activities call
for a review of the maintenance officer training regimen to ensure it is complete and contiguous.
The reorganization to the CWO, ever increasing O&M costs associated with our aging
aircraft fleet, and the diversity of operations in expeditionary wings have increased the need for
exceptional maintenance management and change management skills in maintenance officers. In
addition, the value of solid technical expertise endures. The creation of MOIC, AMMOS and the
21A/M DT has brought about significant improvements in the maintenance officer training and
development process, but shortfalls still exist.
While many training opportunities are available for maintenance officers, they do not
complement each other effectively. Continuation training is not standardized across the
MAJCOMs, where training is available for those in some key maintenance leadership positions,
but not others. Moreover, practical formal training for MOOs, who synergize the operations of
several AMUs, and training for deployed operations needs improvement. Also of vital
importance is the lack of LEAN, and other change management training at the wing level.
Finally, CoPs are emerging as a vital force-multiplier in civilian professional circles, and they are
beginning to take hold in the military, but one has yet to be created specifically for maintenance
officers.
The shortfalls in aircraft maintenance officer training combine to limit the potential for
maintenance officers to serve most effectively in an environment encompassing an aging aircraft
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
39/53
fleet, an increase in operations and maintenance (O&M) costs coupled with leaner O&M
budgets, and the rigors of deployed operations as part of an Expeditionary Aerospace Force.
Some of these shortfalls can be remedied by implementing initiatives currently in development,
and others by taking MAJCOM-specific programs Air Force-wide. In a few cases, courses may
need to be redesigned or created to fill the gaps. In addition, the use of CBT can help get the
most out of limited resources, like time and money, but it should be implemented with care to
avoid overwhelming the force.
In summary, it is difficult to find an informed person who does not believe America has
the worlds finest Air Force, and it was unarguably built on the backs of the worlds finest corps
of professional maintenance officers and enlisted technicians. That said, there is always room
for improvement, especially as we attempt to keep pace with the future.
Areas for Future Study.
Research for this paper surfaced several areas for future study and consideration by
senior maintenance leadership, but as they relate specifically to professional development rather
than training, they do not fall within the scope of this paper. Two of those areas are especially
worth mentioning. The first concerns the channeling , or stovepiping, of officers within
maintenance and logistics readiness officer career fields with respect to the need for a broad
experience base in staff and senior officer positions. The CWO moved the logistics-related
fields of logistics plans, supply and transportation to the mission support group, effectively
eliminating the opportunity for senior maintenance officers to gain experience in managing
diverse logistics-related functions. The de-emphasizing of crossflow between maintenance and
logistics further limits opportunities to develop a broad understanding of both functions at the
junior officer level. In 1985, Lieutenant General Zettler, former AF/IL, addressed the logistics
generalist versus specialist argument in his Industrial College of the Armed Forces research
36
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
40/53
paper. He surmised that the channeled experience of maintenance officers has a negative impact
on developing senior leaders into executive-level generalists.50
The need for executive-level
generalists exists today as senior maintenance officers serve as deployed A4s, in various AF/A4
positions, and on regional combatant command and joint staffs, where maintenance encompasses
a just small subset of their scope of responsibility. In order to perform more effectively in these
positions, maintenance officers must have a better understanding of logistics than a career in
maintenance-specific assignments allows.
The second area concerns stovepiping within the aircraft maintenance career field.
Today, it is common for maintenance officers to spend an entire career solely associated with the
CAF or MAF, or even with one aircraft type. Stovepiping in aircraft experience poses certain
ramifications. First, maintenance officers with experience in only one type aircraft face steep
learning curves when deployed into expeditionary positions that manage airframes with which
they have no experience. In addition, the stovepiping of aircraft experience limits the knowledge
and transference of best practices between MAJCOMs and even within wings of the same
MAJCOM that only maintain one aircraft type. Senior maintenance leadership should reflect the
ramifications of aircraft-type stovepiping and consider formalizing a process for varying
experiences through the assignment system.
50 Michael E. Zettler, Air Force Logisticians: Generalists or Specialists (research Paper, Industrial College of the
Armed Forces, March 1986), iv-v.
.
37
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
41/53
APPENDIX A: CLR RECOMMENDATIONS RELEVANT TO THIS PAPER
Improve officer (logistics and rated) maintenance training. Standardize nonrepetitive maintenance/deployment training tasks.
Encourage and facilitate the use of metrics to balance daily sortie production and long-term fleethealth management at the wing level. Consider implementing additional maintenance and maintenance management policy
improvements, and additional job performance aids, and further refine training and educationopportunities.
Proceed with Air Forcewide implementation of CLR sortie production/fleet health initiativesand consider alternatives to further enhance maintenance process execution.
Develop Weapons Schooltype training for logistics officers.
38
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
42/53
APPENDIX B: AMOC COURSE TOPICSBlock I - Orientation, Maintenance Terms, Practices, and Inspections 76 Hours1. Orientation (2 hrs)
2. Common Maintenance Practices and Terms (14.5 hrs)
3. Inspector General, Publications and Technical Orders (14 hrs)4. Composite Tool Kit (CTK) Program (14 hrs)
5. Inspections, Servicing, and Ground Handling (30 hrs)
6. Written Measurement and Feedback (1.5 hrs)
Block I I - Aircraft Systems I1. Airframe2. Hydraulics
3. Fuels
4. Engines
5. Egress6. Written Measurement and Feedback
80 Hours
(29 hrs)(9.5 hrs)
(10 hrs)
(26 hrs)
(4 hrs)(1.5 hrs)
Block I II - Aircraft Systems II 72 Hours1. Utility Systems (23 hrs)
2. Electrical Systems (14 hrs)3. Communication and Navigation Systems (33.5 hrs)
4. Written Measurement and Feedback (1.5 hrs)
Block IV - Munitions 72 Hours1. Safety (9 hrs)
2. Munitions (28 hrs)
3. Armament (9 hrs)4. Nuclear Weapons Familiarization (3 hrs)
5. Physical Security/Resource Protection (8 hrs)
6. Air Force Occupational Safety and Health (AFOSH), Hazardous Communication (13.5 hrs)(HAZCOM) and the Environment
7. Written Measurement and Feedback (1.5 hrs)
Block V - Logistics and Resources1. Logistics Core
2. Supply Processes and Products3. Depot Reparables and Resource Management
4. Deployment Planning
5. Enlisted/Civilian Force Career Development6. Written Measurement and Feedback
80 Hours
(23 hrs)
(18.5 hrs)(10 hrs)
(19 hrs)
(8 hrs)(1.5 hrs)
Block VI - Flight Line Operations 72 Hours
1. Flight Line Processes (18.5 hrs)2. Operations and Logistics Staff Agencies (17 hrs)
3. Documentation and Total Force (35 hrs)4. Written Measurement and Feedback (1.5 hrs)
Block VII - Maintenance Plans, Operations and Contingencies 90 Hours1. Sortie Generation and Contingency Response (88.5 hrs)
2. Course Feedback, Graduation, and Outprocessing (3.5 hrs)
39
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
43/53
APPENDIX C: MOIC COURSE TOPICS
Block I - Aircraft and Munitions Support1. Orientation
2. Course Pre-Test3. Maintenance Officer Responsibilities
4. Personnel Readiness
5. Training6. Budget
7. Supply/Acquisition Process
8. Air Force Material Command9. Munitions
10. Process Improvement
11. Block I Written Measurement and Feedback
62.5 Hrs
(2 hrs)
(1.5 hrs)(7 hrs)
(5 hrs)
(5 hrs)(1.5 hrs)
(5 hrs)
(11.5 hrs)(8.5 hrs)
(14 hrs)
(1.5 hrs)
Block 2 - Aircraft and Munitions Management
1. Forms2. Quality Assurance3. Analysis
4. Operations
5. Deployments6. Block II Written Measurement and Feedback
7. Course Feedback and Graduation
8. Outprocessing Appointments
55.5 Hours
(3.5 hrs)(1.5 hrs)(5.5 hrs)
(14.5 hrs)
(27.5 hrs)(1.5 hrs)
(1.5 hrs)
(2 hrs)
40
-
7/29/2019 Better Aircraft Maintenance
44/53
APPENDIX D: AMMOS COURSE TOPICS
ADMIN & INTRODUCTION (1 Week)INT3000 - Maintenance InstructorTraining
READY THE FORCE (3 Weeks)RTF1000 - The Doctrinal Foundation
U.S. National Security Strategy and the relationship to doctrineBasic aerospace doctrine and application for logisticians
Tenets of focused logistics and service/joint logistics doctrine
USAF Agile Combat Support concepts
RTF2000 - The Organizational Framework
Historical perspective on organizations and the current world orderNational security organization and hierarchy of command
USAF command structure and its relationship to the national security structureCOMAFFOR/A-Staff roles, responsibilities and organization
JFACC/AOC roles, responsibilities and organizationService perspectives on air power
AEF concepts and organization an