295© The Author(s) 2017L. Earle, Transgressive Citizenship and the Struggle for Social Justice, Studies of the Americas, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51400-0

Abers, R. (1988). Learning democratic practice: Distributing government resources through popular participation in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In J. Friedmann & M.  Douglass (Eds.), Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age. Chichester: Wiley.

Abramo, L. W. (1994). Metalworkers’ strike in São Bernardo: Dignity at the work-place. In L. Kowarick (Ed.), Social struggles and the city: The case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Abrams, P. (2006). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Agar, M. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnogra-phy. San Diego: Academic press.

Alvarez, S. (1990). Engendering democracy in Brazil: Women’s movements in tran-sition politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Alvarez, S., Dagnino, E., & Escobar, A. (Eds.). (1998). Cultures of politics, politics of culture: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview.

Amaral, A. (2002). Habitação na cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.Amis, L. (2013). Striving for excellence: Mega-sporting events and human rights,

Occasional paper series, No. 2. London: Institute for Human Rights and Business.

Amora, D. (2015, May 07). Um ano após a Copa do Mundo, 35 obras não estão prontas. Folha de São Paulo.

ANCOP. (2014). Dossiê Megaeventos e violações de direitos humanos no Brasil. Articulação Nacional dos Comitês Populares da Copa e Olimpíadas. www.por-talpopulardacopa.org.br. Accessed 7 Oct 2015.

BiBliography

296 BIBLIOGRAPHY

ANCPC. (2012). Megaeventos e violações de direitos humanos no Brasil. São Paulo, Articulação Nactional dos Comitês Populares da Copa. https://comitepopu-lario.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/dossie_violacoes_copa_completo.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

Andrade, J. (2001). Da cultura da intervenção à intervenção da cultura: Consenso e gentrificação nas novas estrategias de revalorização do centro histórico de São Paulo. Undergraduate thesis, Geography Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Arantes, O. (1998). Urbanismo em fim de linha e outros estudos sobre colapso da modernização arquitetônîca. São Paulo: Edusp.

Arantes, P. (2004). Reinventing the building site. In E.  Andreoli & A.  Forty (Eds.), Brazil’s modern architecture. London: Phaidon.

Arantes, P. (2009, October 01). ‘Minha casa, minha vida’ ignora o que PT e movi-mentos ja fizeram. Correio da Cidadania. http://www.correiocidadania.com.br. Accessed 10 July 2015.

Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Baeten, G. (2002). Western utopianism/dystopianism and the political mediocrity of critical urban research. Geografiska Annaler, 84B(3–4), 143–152.

Baierle, S. (1998). The explosion of experience: The emergence of a new ethical- political principle in popular movements in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In S. Alvarez, E.  Dagnino, & A.  Escobar (Eds.), Cultures of politics, politics of culture: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview.

Baiocchi, G. (2004). Porto Alegre: The dynamism of the unorganized. In D. Chavez & B. Goldfrank (Eds.), The left in the city: Participatory local govern-ments in Latin America. London: Latin America Bureau.

Baiocchi, G., Silva, M., & Heller, P. (2011). Bootsrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bammer, A. (1991). Partial visions: Feminism and utopianism in the 1970s. New York/London: Routledge.

Barbalet, J. (1988). Citizenship. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Barbosa, B. (2014). Protagonismo dos movimentos de moradia no centro de São

Paulo: trajetória, lutas e influencias nas políticas habitacionais. MA thesis, Universidade Federal do ABC.

Bava, S. C. (1994). Neighbourhood movements and the trade unions: The São Bernardo experience. In L. Kowarick (Ed.), Social struggles and the city: The case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Beall, J., & Fox, S. (2009). Cities and development. Abingdon: Routledge.Bedau, H. (Ed.). (1991). Civil disobedience in focus. London: Routledge.

297BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bergamim, G. (2014, November 25). Invasões de sem-teto quase triplicam durante gestão Haddad in Folha de São Paulo.

Bonduki, N. (1998). Origens da habitação social no Brasil. Arquitetura moderna, lei do inquilinato e difusão da casa própria. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.

Bonduki, N. (2000). Habitar São Paulo. Reflexões sobre a gestão urbana. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade.

Boulos, G. (2012). Por que ocupamos? Uma introdução à luta dos sem-teto. São Paulo: Editora Scortecci.

Boulos, G. (2014a, August 7). Cara eu ganho. Coroa, você perde!. Folha de São Paulo.

Boulos, G. (2014b, July 1). A batalha do Plano Diretor. Folha de São Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014c, August 22). Quem são mesmo os invasores? Folha de São

Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014d, June 17). Uma honra para o MTST. Folha de São Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014e, October 2). Eles venceram outra vez. Folha de São Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014f, June 26). Receita para acabar com as ocupações. Folha de São

Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014g, December 18). Indicar Kassab é brincar com fogo. Folha de

São Paulo.Boulos, G. (2014h, December 11). 63 dias de luta. Folha de São Paulo.Boulos, G. (2015, March 19). Sobre o 15 de março. Folha de São Paulo.Boulos, G., Rocha, J., & das Dores, M. (2014, May 5). O que quer o MTST?

Folha de São Paulo.Brandford, S., & Rocha, J. (2002). Cutting the wire: The story of the landless move-

ment in Brazil. London: Latin America Bureau.Brandt, V. C. (1983). Da resistência aos movimentos sociais: A emergência das

classes populares em São Paulo. In P. Singer & V. C. Brandt (Eds.), São Paulo: O povo em movimento. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

Bresciani, E. and Jungblut, C. (2016, May 03) Diferença fundamental é que não há crime cometido por Dilma, diz auto de impeachment de Collor. O Globo

Brito, F., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Brown, A., & Kristiansen, A. (2009). Urban policies and the right to the city. Rights, responsibilities and citizenship. Paris: UNESCO.

Brownlee, K. (2007). Civil disobedience. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil- disobedience. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.

Budds, J., & Teixeira, P. (2005). Ensuring the right to the city: Pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalization in São Paulo, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), 89–114.

Buzanello, J.  C. (2005). Em torno da constituição do direito de resistência. Revista da Informação Legislativa, 42(168), 19–27.

298 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Caldeira, T. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation and citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Caldeira, T. (2013). São Paulo: The city and its protests. http://kafila.org/2013/07/05/sao-paulo-the-city-and-its-protests-teresa-caldeira/. Accessed 25 May 2015.

Caldeira, T., & Holston, J. (2015). Participatory urban planning in Brazil. Urban Studies, 52(11), 2001–2017.

Campbell, S., & Fainstein, S. (1996). The structure and debates of planning the-ory. In S. Campbell & S. Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cardoso, F. H. (1986). Entrepreneurs and the transition process: The Brazilian case. In G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from authoritarian rule. Part III: Comparative perspectives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cardoso, R. (1992). Popular movements in the context of the consolidation of democracy in Brazil. In A. Escobar & S. Alvarez (Eds.), The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy and democracy. Boulder: Westview.

Caricari, A.  M., & Kohara, L. (Eds.). (2006). Cortiços em São Paulo. Soluções viáveis para habitação social no centro da cidade e legislação de proteção à mora-dia. São Paulo: Centro Gaspar Garcia/Mídia Alternativa.

Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.

Carvalho, B. (2016). Occupying all streets: Protesting a right to the future. In B. Carvalho, M. Cavalcanti, & V. Venturupalli (Eds.), Occupy all streets: Olympic urbanism and contested futures in Rio de Janeiro. New York: Terreform.

Carvalho, B., Cavalcanti, M., & Venturupalli, V. (Eds.). (2016). Occupy all streets: Olympic urbanism and contested futures in Rio de Janeiro. New York: Terreform.

Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Castro, D., & Novaes, P. (2015). Copa do Mundo 2014 e os Impactos no Direito à Moradia: uma análise das cidades-sede brasileiras. In O.  Santos Junior, G. Gaffney, & L. Ribeiro (Eds.), Brasil: Os impactos da Copa do Mundo 2014 e das Olimpíadas 2016 Rio de Janeiro, Observatório das Metrópoles e-papers. http://www.observatoriodasmetropoles.net. Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

Cavalcanti, G.  V. (2006). Uma Concessão ao Passado: Trajetórias da União dos Movimentos de Moradia de São Paulo. Masters thesis, Departamento de Sociologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

CDHU. (2012). Relatório Geral do Programa de atuação em cortiços. São Paulo, CDHU. http://www.cdhu.sp.gov.br/download/manual/RelatorioGeral ProgramaCorticos.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2015.

CMSP. (2015). Indicador Metropolitano no. 44. São Paulo: Câmara Municipal de São Paulo.

299BIBLIOGRAPHY

Coelho, V. (2007). Brazilian Health Councils: Including the excluded? In A. Cornwall & V. Coelho (Eds.), Spaces for change? The politics of citizen par-ticipation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed Books.

Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M., & Veron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cornwall, A. (2002). Making spaces, changing places: Situating participation in development, IDS working paper 170. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Cornwall, A. (2007). Democratizing the governance of health services: The case of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, Brazil. In A. Cornwall & V. Coelho (Eds.), Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed Books.

Craske, N., & Molyneux, M. (2002). The local, the regional and the global: Transforming the politics of rights. In N.  Craske & M.  Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Cunningham, F. (2010). Triangulating utopia: Benjamin, Lefebvre, Tafuri. City, 14(3), 268–277.

D’Entrèves, M. (1992). Hannah Arendt and the idea of citizenship. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, community. London: Verso.

da Gohn, M.  G. (2013, July 14). Após atos, governo não tem interlocutores. Estado de São Paulo.

Dagnino, E. (1998). Culture, citizenship and democracy: Changing discourse and practices of the Latin American left. In S. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, & A. Escobar (Eds.), Cultures of politics, politics of culture: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview.

Dagnino, E. (2007). Citizenship: A perverse confluence. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 549–556.

DaMatta, R. (1991). Carnivals, rogues and heroes: An interpretation of the Brazilian dilemma. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.de Holanda, S. B. (1969 [1936]). Raizes do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jose Olympio

Editora.Dias, M., & Souza, F. (2014, May 08). Após reunião, sem-teto diz que Dilma

estuda desapropriar área em Itaquera. Folha de São Paulo. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2014/05/1451363-sem-teto-diz-que-dilma-estuda- moradia- popular-em-area-perto-do-itaquerao.shtml. Accessed 14th Nov 2015.

300 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dicke, K. (2002). The founding function of human dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In D. Kretzmer & E. Klein (Eds.), The concept of human dignity in human rights discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Diederichsen, F. B. (2003). Limites à produção da moradia social no centro de São Paulo. Undergraduate thesis, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Donaghy, M. (2013). Civil society and participatory governance: Municipal coun-cils and social housing programs in Brazil. New York: Routledge.

Duquette, M. (2005). Social movements and radicalism: The Brazilian context. In M. Duquette (Ed.), Collective action and radicalism in Brazil: Women, urban housing, and rural movements. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Escobar, A., & Alvarez, S. (Eds.). (1992). The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy and democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.

Farias, J. (2000). Direito de resistência: Uma ação social organizada para efetivação dos direitos fundamentais. http://www.uj.com.br/publicacoes/doutrinas/default.asp?action=doutrina&coddou=704. Accessed 01 Nov 08.

Ferguson, J. (1999). Expectations of modernity: Myths and meanings of urban life on the Zambian copperbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fernandes, E. (2007a). Constructing the ‘right to the city’ in Brazil. Social and Legal Studies, 16(2), 201–219.

Fernandes, E. (2007b). Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 177–189.

Ferreira, J. (Ed.). (2012). Produzir Casas ou Construir Cidades? Desafios para um novo Brasil Urbano. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Habitação e Assentamentos Humanos – LabHab.

Fishman, R. (1996). Urban utopias: Ebenezer Howard and Le Corbusier. In S.  Campbell & S.  Fainstein (Eds.), Readings in planning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

Fortes, A. (2016). ‘Brazil’s neoconservative offensive. NACLA Report on the Americas, 48(3), 217–220.

Foweraker, J. (2001). Grassroots movements, political activism and social develop-ment in Latin America: A comparison of Chile and Brazil. Geneva: UNRISD.

Foweraker, J., & Landman, T. (1997). Citizenship and social movements: A com-parative and statistical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freeden, M. (1991). Rights. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Friendly, A. (2012). The right to the city: Theory and practice in Brazil. Planning

Theory and Practice, 14(2), 158–179.Frugoli, H. (2000). Centralidade em São Paulo: Trajetórias, conflitos e negociações

na metrópole. São Paulo: EDUSP.Fry, P. (1999). Colour and the rule of law in Brazil. In J. Mendez, G. O’Donnell,

& S.  Pinheiro (Eds.), The (un)rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

301BIBLIOGRAPHY

Fung, A., & Wright, E. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.

Gaffney, C. (2014, October 01) Global parties, galactic hangovers: Brazil’s mega event dystopia. Los Angeles Review of Books: The Magazine. https://lareviewof-books.org/essay/global-parties-galactic-hangovers-brazils-mega-event- dystopia. Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

Galdino, M. (2005). The return of radicalism to the countryside: The landless movement. In M. Duquette (Ed.), Collective action and radicalism in Brazil: Women, urban housing and rural movements. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transforma-tive possibilities. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed Books.

Gilbert, L., & Dikeç, M. (2008). Right to the city: Politics of citizenship. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), On the produc-tion of Henri Lefebvre. Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.

Goldfrank, B. (2007). The politics of deepening local democracy: Decentralisation, party institutionalisation and participation. Comparative Politics, 39(2), 147–168.

Goldstone, J. (2003). Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. In J.  Goldstone (Ed.), States, parties and social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grandin, G. (2016, March 22). Millennials are taking to the streets to defend democracy in Brazil. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/millennials- are-taking-to-the-streets-to-defend-democracy-in-brazil/. Accessed 26 Sep 16.

Greenwald, G., Fishman, A., & Miranda, D. (2016, March 18). Brazil is engulfed by ruling class corruption  – and a dangerous subversion of democracy. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2016/03/18/brazil-is-engulfed-by-ruling- class-corruption-and-a-dangerous-subversion-of-democracy/. Accessed 22 Sep 16.

Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Grostein, M. (1987). A cidade clandestina: Os ritos e os mitos. O papel da ‘irregu-

laridade’ na estruturação do espaço urbano no município de São Paulo.1900–1987. Ph.D. thesis, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

Gupta, A. (2006). The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics and the imagined state. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state. Oxford: Blackwell.

302 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hagopian, F. (1994). Traditional politics and the state in Brazil. In J. Migdal, A. Kohli, & V. Shue (Eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and trans-formation in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hagopian, F. (1996). Traditional politics and regime change in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hagopian, F. (2016). Brazil’s accountability paradox. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 119–128.

Handler, J. (1978). Social movements and the legal system: A theory of law reform and social change. New York: Academic Press.

Harrison, P., Todes, A., & Watson, V. (2008). Planning and transformation: Learning from the post-apartheid experience. Abingdon: Routledge.

Harriss, J., Stokke, K., & Tornquist, O. (Eds.). (2004). Politicising democracy: The new local politics and democratisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Harvey, D. (1988). Social justice and the city. Oxford: Blackwell.Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford:

Blackwell.Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and

Regional Research, 27(4), 939–941.Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–39.Hayes, G. (2007). Collective action and civil disobedience: The anti-GMO cam-

paign of the Faucheurs Volontaires. French Politics, 5, 293–314.Held, D. (1989). Political theory and the modern state: Essays on state, power and

democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Heller, P. (2001). Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralisation in

Kerala, South Africa and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society, 29(1), 131–163.Hellman, J. (1992). The study of new social movements in Latin America and the

question of autonomy. In S. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, & A. Escobar (Eds.), The making of social movements in Latin America: Identity, strategy and democracy. Boulder: Westview.

Hellmann, M. (1995). Democratizaçao e movimentos sociais no Brasil. In M. Hellmann (Ed.), Movimentos sociais e democracia no Brasil: “Sem a gente não tem jeito”. São Paulo: Marco Zero.

Hirata, F. (2009). “Minha Casa, Minha Vida”: Política habitacional e de geração de emprego ou aprofundamento da segregação urbana? Aurora, 3(4), 1–11.

Hirschl, R. (2003). The political origins of judicial empowerment through consti-tutionalization: Lessons from four constitutional revolutions. In R.  Dahl, I. Shapiro, & J. A. Cheibub (Eds.), The democracy sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

303BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hochstetler, K. (2000). Democratising pressures from below? Social movements in the new Brazilian democracy. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Holson, J.  (1989). The modernist city: An anthropological critique of Brasilia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Holston, J. (1991). The misrule of law: Land and usurpation in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 33(4), 695–725.

Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton university press.

Holston, J.  (2014). “Come to the street!”: Urban protest, Brazil 2013. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), 887–900.

Holston, J., & Appadurai, A. (1993). Cities and citizenship. In J. Holston (Ed.), Cities and citizenship. Durham: Duke University Press.

Holston, J., & Caldeira, T. (1998). Democracy, law and violence: Disjunctions of Brazilian citizenship. In F. Aguero & J. Stark (Eds.), Fault lines of democracy in post-transition Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Houtzager, P. (2005). The Movement of the Landless (MST) and the juridical field in Brazil, IDS working paper 248. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Houtzager, P., Lavalle, A., & Acharya, A. (2003). Who participates? Civil society and the new democratic politics in São Paulo, Brazil, Working paper. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

IBGE. (2014). Nota Técnica: Estimativas da População dos municípios brasileiros com data de referênvis em 1°de julho de 2014. São Paulo: Institute Brasileiro de Geografia e Estadística.

Ippolito-O’Donnell, G. (2011). The right to the city: Popular contention in contem-porary Buenos Aires. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.

Isin, E. (2000). Democracy, citizenship and the city. In E. Isin (Ed.), Democracy, citizenship and the global city. London: Routledge.

Jacobi, P. (1987). Movimentos sociais urbanos numa época de transição: Limites e possibilidades. In E. Sader (Ed.), Movimentos sociais na transição democrática. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.

Jones, P. (2004). Law and disobedience. Res Publica, 10, 319–336.Jones, P. (2005). Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Katznelson, I. (1988). Forward. In D. Harvey (Ed.), Social justice and the city.

Oxford: Blackwell.Keck, M. (1992). The workers’ party and democratization in Brazil. New Haven:

Yale University Press.Kingstone, P., & Power, T. (2000). Still standing or standing still? The Brazilian

democratic regime since 1985. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: Pittsburg Press.

304 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Kipfer, S., Goonewardena, K., Schmid, C., & Milgrom, R. (2008a). On the pro-duction of Henri Lefebvre. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C.  Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.

Kipfer, S., Goonewardena, K., Schmid, C., & Milgrom, R. (2008b). Globalizing Lefebvre? In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.

Klauser, F. (2012). Sport megaevents and the city. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 1–2.

Kofman, E., & Lebas, E. (1996). Lost in transposition – Time, space and the city. In E. Kofman & E. Kebas (Eds.), Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kohara, L. (1999). Rendimentos obtidos na locação e sublocação de cortiços. Estudo de casos na área central da cidade de São Paulo. MA thesis, Escola politécnica São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo.

Kohara, L. (2013). As contribuições dos movimentos de moradia do Centro para as políticas habitacionais e do desenvolvimento urbano do centro da cidade de São Paulo. University of São Paulo Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Post- doctoral research report.

Koonings, K. (2004). Strengthening citizenship in Brazil’s democracy: Local par-ticipatory governance in Porto Alegre. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(1), 79–99.

Kowarick, L. (1979). A espoliação urbana. São Paulo: Paz e terra.Kowarick, L. (1994). Introduction. In L. Kowarick (Ed.), Social struggles and the

city: The case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press.Kowarick, L. (Ed.). (2004). Debate – A pesquisa sobre segregação: Conceitos,

métodos e medições. Espaço e debates. Revista de estudos regionais e urbanos, 24(45), 87–109.

Krause, C., Balbim, R., & Neto, V. (2013). Minha Casa Minha Vida, nosso cresci-mento: Onde fica política habitacional? Discussion paper no. 1853. Brasilia: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).

Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2007). Mobilising citizens: Social movements and the politics of knowledge, IDS working paper 276. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (trans: Kofman, E., & Lebas, E.). Oxford:

Blackwell.Leitzel, J. (2002). The political economy of rule evasion and policy reform. London:

Routledge.Levy, C. (2005). The housing movement in the city of São Paulo: Crisis and

revival. In M.  Duquette (Ed.), Collective action and radicalism in Brazil: Women, urban housing and rural movements. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

305BIBLIOGRAPHY

Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Lowi, T. (1971). The politics of disorder. New York: Basic Books.Macaulay, F. (2002). Taking the law into their own hands: Women, legal reform

and legal literacy in Brazil. In N. Craske & M. Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Mainwaring, S. (1987). Urban popular movements, identity and democratization in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 20(2), 131–159.

Mainwaring, S. (1989). Grassroots popular movements and the struggle for democracy. In A.  Stepan (Ed.), Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2), 185–197.

Maricato, E. (1996). Metrópole na periferia do capitalismo: Ilegalidade, desigual-dade e violência. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Maricato, E. (2000). As idéais fora do lugar e o lugar fora das idéias. In O. Arantes, C. Vainer, & E. Maricato (Eds.), A cidade do pensamento único: Desmanchando consensos. São Paulo: Editora Vozes.

Maricato, E. (2013). Ee a questão urbana, estúpido! In Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Marques, E., & Torres, H. (2005). São Paulo: Segregação, pobreza e desigualdades sociais. São Paulo: SENAC.

Marshall, T.  H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development. New  York: Doubleday.

Martine, G., & McGranahan, G. (2014). Brazil’s negligent urban transition and its legacy of divided cities. In G. McGranahan & G. Martine (Eds.), Urban growth in emerging economies: Lessons from the BRICS. Abingdon: Routledge.

Martins, L. (1986). The ‘liberalization’ of authoritarian rule in Brazil. In G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from authori-tarian rule: Prospects for democracy. Part II Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mayer, M. (2009). The right to the city in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2), 362–374.

McCann, M. (Ed.). (2006). Law and social movements. London: Ashgate.Melo, M. (1996). Juiz aplica constituição para proteger invasores. Caderno de

Jurisprudência, 2(19).Mendieta, E. (2008). The production of urban space in the age of transnational

mega-urbes. City, 12(2), 148–153.Meszaros, G. (2000). Taking the land into their hands: The landless workers’

movement and the Brazilian state. Journal of Law and Society, 27(4), 517–541.Mídia Independente. (2007, August 02). Polícia Militar visita a ocupação Prestes

Maia.

306 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Migdal, J. (1994). The state in society: An approach to struggles for domination. In J.  Migdal, A.  Kohli, & V.  Shue (Eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Migdal, J., Kohli, A., & Shue, V. (1994). Developing a state-in-society perspec-tive. In J. Migdal, A. Kohli, & V. Shue (Eds.), State power and social forces: Domination and transformation in the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Millstein, M., Oldfield, S., & Stokke, K. (2003). uTshani BuyaKhuluma – The grass speaks: The political space and capacity of the South African Homeless People’s Federation. Geoforum, 34, 457–468.

Ministério das Cidades. (2013). Déficit Habitacional Municipal no Brasil 2010. Belo Horizonte: Ministério das Cidades Secretaria Nacional de Habitação/Fundação João Pinheiro.

Mitchell, T. (1991). The limits of the state: Beyond statist approaches and their critics. The American Political Science Review, 85(1), 77–96.

Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guildford Press.

Mitchell, T. (2006). Society, economy and the state effect. In A.  Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Molyneux, M. (2002). Gender and the silences of social capital: Lessons from Latin America. Development and Change, 33(2), 167–188.

Montero, A. (2014). Brazil: Reversal of fortune. Cambridge: Polity Press.Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Nettl, J. P. (1967). Political mobilization: A sociological analysis of methods and

concepts. London: Faber and Faber.Neves, Â. V. (2007, April 25–27). Espaços públicos e práticas políticas: Os riscos

de despolitização da sociedade civil. Presented at Conference Movimentos soci-ais, participação e democracia, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Nielsen, L. (2004). The work of rights and the work rights do: A critical empirical approach. In A. Sarat (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to law and society. Oxford: Blackwell.

Nylen, W. (2000). The making of a loyal opposition: The Workers’ Party (PT) and the consolidation of democracy in Brazil. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

O’Donnell, G. (1992). Transitions, continuities and paradoxes. In S. Mainwearing, G. O’Donnell, & J. S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Issues in democratic consolidation: The new South American democracies in comparative perspective. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

O’Donnell, G. (1999). Polyarchies and the (un)rule of law in Latin America: A partial conclusion. In J. Mendez, G. O’Donnell, & S. Pinheiro (Eds.), The (un)

307BIBLIOGRAPHY

rule of law and the underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Oliveira, F. d. (1982). O estado e o urbano no Brasil. Espaço e debates. Revista de estudos regionais e urbanos, 6, 36–54.

Oliveira, L. (1987). O movimento operário em São Paulo. In E.  Sader (Ed.), Movimentos sociais na transição democrática. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.

Oliveira, F. d. (2003). O ornitorrinco. São Paulo: Boitempo.Paoli, M., & Telles, V. (1998). Social rights: Conflicts and negotiations in contem-

porary Brazil. In S. Alvarez, E. Dagnino, & A. Escobar (Eds.), Cultures of poli-tics/politics of cultures: Revisioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview.

Parker, S. (2004). Urban theory and the urban experience. Encountering the city. London: Routledge.

Parnell, S., & Pieterse, E. (2010). The ‘right to the city’: Institutional imperatives of a developmental state. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), 146–162.

Passos, E. (2002). Doing legal research in Brazil. http://www.llrx.com/features/brazil2002.htm. Accessed 15 Sept 2008.

Pereira, A. (2000). An ugly democracy? State violence and the rule of law in post-authoritarian Brazil. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: Pittsburg Press.

Perlman, J. (1976). The myth of marginality. Urban poverty and politics in Rio de Janeiro. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2003). Whither Brazil? www.rebellion.org/petrasen-glish.htm

Pieterse, E. (2008). City futures: Confronting the crisis of urban development. New York/London: Zed.

Pinder, D. (2005). Visions of the city. Utopianism, power and politics in twentieth- century urbanism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Power, T., & Roberts, J.  T. (2000). A new Brazil? The changing sociodemo-graphic context of Brazilian democracy. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo. (2004). Programa Morar no Centro. São Paulo: Secretaria de Habitação e Desenvolvimento Urbano.

Presidencia da Republica. (2001). Lei N. 10.257, de 10 de julho de 2001. Brasilia, Casa Civil – Subchefia para assuntos juridicos. www.cidades.gov.br. Accessed 22 Sept 2008.

Presidência da República, Casa Civil. (1988). Constituicação da Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. www.planalto.gov.br

Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban poli-tics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.

308 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Purcell, M. (2008). Recapturing democracy. Neoliberalization and the struggle for alternative urban futures. New York/London: Routledge.

Rawls, J. (1991). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rizek, C. (2003). Os sentidos da cidade brasileira: Figurações da ordem e de seus

avessos. Espaço e debates. Revista de estudos regionais e urbanos, 23(43–44), 79–91.

Rizek, C., Barros, J., & Bergamim, M. (2003). A política de produção habitacio-nal por mutirões autogeridos. Revista brasileira de estudos urbanos e regionais, 5(1).

Roche, M. (1987). Citizenship, social theory and social change. Theory and Society, 16, 363–399.

Roche, M. (2002). Social citizenship: Grounds of social change. In E.  Isin & B. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies. London: Sage.

Rodgers, D. (2007). Subverting the spaces of invitation? Local politics and partici-patory budgeting in post-crisis Buenos Aires. In A.  Cornwall & V.  Coelho (Eds.), Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed Books.

Rolnik, R. (1995). The city and the law: Legislation, urban policy and territories in the city of São Paulo (1886–1936). Ph.D. thesis, History Department, New York University, New York.

Rolnik, R. (2009). Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council 13th Session.

Rolnik, R. (2013). As vozes das ruas: As revoltas de junho e suas interpretações. In Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Rolnik, R., Kowarick, L., & Somekh, N. (1991). São Paulo: Crise e Mudança. São Paulo: Brasiliense.

Ronneberger, K. (2008). Henri Lefebvre and urban everyday life: In search of the possible. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life. Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.

Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tac-tics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.

Saad-Filho, A. (2013). Mass protests under ‘Left Neoliberalism’: Brazil, June–July 2013. Critical Sociology, 39, 657–669.

Saad-Filho, A., & Boito, A. (2016). Brazil: The failure of the PT and the rise of the ‘New Right’. Socialist Register, 52, 213–230.

Saad-Filho, A., & Morais, L. (2014). Mass protests: Brazilian Spring or Brazilian malaise? Socialist Register, 2014, 227–246.

Sadek, M. T. (2001). The public prosecutor’s office and legal change in Brazil. IDS Bulletin, 32(1), 65–75.

309BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sader, E. (1988). Quando novos personagens entraram em cena: Experiências, falas e lutas dos trabalhadores da Grande São Paulo (1970–1980). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

Sagoff, M. (1999). The view from Quincy library: Civic engagement in environ-mental problem solving. In R. Fullinwider (Ed.), Civil society, democracy and civic renewal. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Sales, T. (1994). Raízes da desigualdade social na cultura brasileira. Revista brasileira de ciências sociais, 9(25), 26–37.

Samuels, D. (2000). Reinventing local government? Municipalities and intergov-ernmental relations in Brazil. In P. Kingstone & T. Power (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes. Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Santos, B. d. S. (1993). Notas sobre a história jurídico-social de Pasárgada. In J. G. Souza Jr. (Ed.), Introdução crítica ao direito. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasília.

Santos, B. d. S. (1995). Toward a new common sense: Law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition. London: Routledge.

Santos, M. (1996). São Paulo: A growth process full of contradictions. In A.  Gilbert (Ed.), The mega-city in Latin America. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Santos, A. (Ed.). (2002). Laboratório de projeto integrado e participativo para requalificação de cortiço. São Paulo: FAUUSP.

Santos Junior, O., & Rocha Lima, C. (2015). Impactos Econômicos dos Megaeventos no Brasil: investimento público, participação privada e difusão do empreendedorismo urbano neoliberal. In O.  Santos Junior, G.  Gaffney, & L. Ribeiro (Eds.), Brasil: Os impactos da Copa do Mundo 2014 e das Olimpíadas 2016 Rio de Janeiro, Observatório das Metrópoles e-papers. http://www.observatoriodasmetropoles.net. Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

São Paulo, M. P. L. (2013). Não começou em Salvador, não vai terminar em São Paulo. In Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Scheingold, S. (2004). The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy and political change. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Schonleitner, G. (2004). Can public deliberation democratise state action? Municipal health councils and local democracy in Brazil. In J. Harris, K. Stokke, & O. Tornquist (Eds.), Politicising democracy: The new local politics and democ-ratisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

SEADE. (2015). SP Demográfico. Resenha de Esatísticas Vitais do Estado de São Paulo. Ano 15(3). São Paulo, Fundação Sistema Estadual de Análise de Dados.

310 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Sharp, D., & Panetta, C. (Eds.). (2016). Beyond the square: Urbanism and the

Arab uprisings. New York: Terreform.Shatkin, G. (2007). Collective action and urban poverty alleviation: Community

organizations and the struggle for shelter in Manila. Aldershot: Ashgate.Shklar, J. (1986 [1964]). Legalism: Law, morals and political trials. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.Silva, G. (2013). Call me the World Cup and invest in me. A commentary on

Brazil’s recent street protests against the World Cup and the Olympic Games. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 5(2), 174–178.

Simoes Jr., J. (1991). Cortiços em São Paulo: O problema e alternativas. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.

Simoes Jr., J. (1994). Revitalização de Centros Urbanos. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.Simone, A. (2010). The right to the city. In E. Pieterse (Ed.), Counter currents.

Experiments in sustainability in the Cape Town region. Auckland Park: Jacana.Singer, P. (1982). Neighbourhood movements in São Paulo. In H. Safa (Ed.),

Towards a political economy of urbanization in third world countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skidmore, T. (1989). Brazil’s slow road to democratization: 1974–1985. In A. Stepan (Ed.), Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Skinner, Q. (1992). On justice, the common good and the priority of liberty. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Dimensions of radical democracy: Pluralism, citizenship, com-munity. London: Verso.

Souto, A., Kayano, J.  (1996). A cidade e o seu governo: o olhar do cidadão. São Paulo: Instituto Polis. Revista no. 26.

Souza, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: Limits and possibili-ties in building democratic institutions. Environment and Urbanization, 13(1), 159–184.

Staeheli, L., & Lawson, V. (1995). Feminism, praxis and human geography. Geographical Analysis, 27, 321–338.

Stepan, A. (1989). Introduction. In A.  Stepan (Ed.), Democratizing Brazil: Problems of transition and consolidation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tarrow, S. (1995). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

Tatagiba, L., & Blikstad, K. (2011). “Como se fosse uma eleição para vereador”: Dinâmicas participativas e disputas partidárias na cidade de São Paulo. Luz Nova, 84, 353–364.

Tatagiba, L., & Teixeira, A. (2007). O papel do Conselho Municipal de Habitação na política de habitação em São Paulo. São Paulo: Instituto Pólis.

311BIBLIOGRAPHY

Tatagiba, L., Teixeira, A., Blikstad, K., & Paterniani, S. (2014). Inovações partici-pativas nas políticas habitacionais para população de baixa renda. Um estudo de caso sobre o Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida  – Entidades. Crítica y Emancipación. Revista Latinoamericana de ciencias sociales, Año VI(11), 215–287.

Taylor, M., & Buranelli, V. (2007). Ending up in pizza. Accountability as a prob-lem of institutional arrangement in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(1), 59–97.

Taylor, V., & Van Dyke, N. (2004). Get up, stand up: Tactical repertoires of social movements. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements. Oxford: Blackwell.

Teixeira, A., & Baiocchi, G. (2014). Brazil’s forgotten political reforms after the June 2013 protests. www.booksandideas.net. Accessed 25 May 2015.

Teixeira, A., Comaru, F., Cymbalista, R., & Sutti, W. (2005). Conflitos em torno do direito à moradia na região central de São Paulo. Rio de Janeiro: Ibase/ActionAid/Ford Foundation.

Telles, V. (1994). The 1970s: Political experiences, practices and spaces. In L. Kowarick (Ed.), Social struggles and the city: The case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Torres, H., Alves, H., & Oliveira, M. (2007). São Paulo peri-urban dynamics: Some social causes and environmental consequences. Environment and Urbanization, 19(1), 207–223.

Turenne, S. (2004). Judicial responses to civil disobedience: A comparative approach. Res Publica, 10, 379–399.

Turner, B. (1986). Citizenship and capitalism: The debate over reformism. London: Allen & Unwin.

UN Habitat. (1996). The habitat agenda. www.unhabitat.org. Accessed 15 Aug 2008.

UNDP. (2005). Human development report. International cooperation at a cross-roads: Aid, trade and security in an unequal world. New York: UNDP.

UN-Habitat. (2010). State of the world’s cities 2010/2011: Bridging the urban divide. Earthscan: London/Washington.

Urquiza, G. (1996). Habitat II: From Discussions to actions? Environment and Urbanization, 8(2), 199–200.

Vainer, C. (2013). Quando a cidade vai às ruas. In Cidades Rebeldes: Passe livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

312 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Villaça, F. (2005). As ilusões do plano diretor. São Paulo. www.flaviovillaca.arq.br. Accessed 10 May 2008.

Wisnik, G., Fix, M., Leite, J., Andrade, J., & Arnates, P. (2001). Notas sobre a Sala São Paulo e a nova fronteira urbana da cultura. Revista Pós da Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da USP, 1–25.

Woessner, M. (2009). Rescuing the ‘right to the city’. City, 13(4), 474–475.Wolford, W. (2010). The land is ours now: Social mobilization and the meanings of

land in Brazil. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

313© The Author(s) 2017L. Earle, Transgressive Citizenship and the Struggle for Social Justice, Studies of the Americas, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51400-0

Index

Aabertura (democratic opening), 112Aliança de Renovação Nacional

(ARENA, Alliance for National Renovation), 111, 112, 191

Assembléia Constituinte (Constituent Assembly), 57, 109, 121, 122, 269

assessor de gabinete (cabinet adviser), 124, 147

autogestão (self-management), 41, 54, 55, 58, 198

BBanco Nacional de Habitação (BNH,

National Housing Bank), 84, 85black blocks, 2bolsa aluguel (emergency rent

support), 181, 202, 209, 215n42Bonduki, Nabil, 54, 69, 71–4, 76,

80–3, 86, 87, 206, 223, 254n47Boulos, Guilherme, 11, 13, 130n21,

146, 151–4, 165, 168, 173–6, 192, 221, 230, 231, 244, 277

CCaldeira, Teresa, 39, 68, 84, 85, 95,

96, 131–5, 149, 157, 159, 169, 182

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, 112, 251Castells, Manuel, 15Catholic Church, 22, 53, 115, 117,

145, 147Central de Movimentos Populares

(CMP, Centre for Popular Movements), 53n13, 209

citizenship rights, 35, 37, 38, 119, 153, 164, 172, 173

civil disobedience, 3, 7, 23, 74n16, 161n24, 187, 237–46, 258

Comitês Populares da Copa (Popular Committees for the World Cup), 97

Companhia de Desenvolvimento Habitacional e Urbano (CDHU, Housing and Urban Development Company), 91, 153, 156, 182, 196, 196n22, 197–200, 214, 227, 247, 248n36, 249

Note: Page numbers followed by “n” denote notes.

314 INDEX

Companhia Metropolitana de Habitação (COHAB, Metrpolitan Housing Company), 153, 182, 186n6, 187, 201, 202, 202n25, 203n26, 204, 208, 210, 213, 214n39, 247, 249, 252n46, 258

Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (Grassroots Christian Communities), 53, 118

constitution of 1988, 11, 31, 34, 41, 48, 57, 109, 152, 163, 164, 169, 182, 243n27, 257, 261, 263, 266, 269

Copa do Povo occupation, 3, 29, 201, 221, 222, 229–31, 237, 255, 256

Corbusier, Le, 69Cortiços, 9, 52, 57, 71, 76, 81, 90–2,

95, 96, 143, 144, 150, 200, 223, 226, 246, 247, 249

DDefensoria Pública (Public Defender’s

Office), 134, 156–8de Holanda, Sérgio Buarque, 79, 80,

159Diretas Já (campaign for direct

elections), 112, 116, 119, 122

EErundina, Luiza, 55, 123, 124, 203,

212Estado de São Paulo newspaper, 158,

255Estatuto da Cidade (City Statute), 47

FFaculty of Architecture and Urbanism

at the University of São Paulo, 69

favelas, 2, 3, 9, 10n6, 39, 52, 53, 59, 72, 72n13, 77, 84, 84n17, 90, 92, 95, 97, 137, 144, 150, 167, 174, 175, 190, 202, 223n2, 230, 236, 264, 270, 271, 278, 286

FIFA, 2, 4, 73n15, 97, 98, 133Folha de São Paulo newspaper,

16, 72n11, 121, 146, 151, 173, 230

Fórum Nacional para Reforma Urbana (FNRU, National Forum for Urban Reform), 11, 49, 159, 164, 191, 244, 244n30, 257, 258n51, 272, 276

Freire, Paulo, 118, 118n7Frente de Lutas por Moradia (FLM,

Housing Struggles Front), 13, 16, 17, 17n9, 20, 27–9, 59, 61, 123, 135–7, 147, 148, 154–6, 163, 165n30, 171n39, 184, 185, 192, 197, 199, 204–7, 213, 214, 224, 228, 229, 234–7, 250, 276

Freyre, Gilberto, 70Fundo Nacional de Habitação de

Interesse Social (FNHIS, National Fund for Social Housing), 56, 60, 185, 191, 192, 196, 197, 269

Fundo Nacional de Moradia Popular (FNMP, National Fund for Popular Housing), 56

HHabitat III, 8Haddad, Fernando, 201, 206, 213,

230, 276Harvey, David, 42, 44, 46, 47, 65, 69,

79, 262, 283–5, 287higienistas (hygienicists), 71, 76, 80,

95, 232

315INDEX

Holston, James, 33, 39, 40, 40n5, 57, 69, 72, 77, 78, 80, 105, 113, 123, 131–5, 137, 149, 157, 169, 182, 262–4, 266–8, 271

home ownership, 11, 81, 83, 85Hotel Mauá occupation, 28, 229housing deficit, 10, 22, 58, 84, 86–8,

225, 241, 242

IItaquera stadium, 13, 97–9, 187, 230,

256

JJune Protests/Jornadas de Junho, 2–4,

20, 116, 128, 131, 133, 135, 136, 138, 184

KKassab, Gilberto, 85, 153, 186n6,

192, 201, 203, 204, 206, 277, 291

LLefebvre, Henri, 7, 21, 24, 42–8,

50–2, 52n10, 54, 58, 59, 262, 282–6, 288

legal pluralism, 78, 269Luis Ignácio “Lula” da Silva, 60, 112

MMaricato, Erminia, 68, 69, 76, 77, 79,

83–5, 90, 94, 95, 158, 159, 223, 270

Marshall, T. H., 21, 34–9, 113, 170Mello, Fernando Collor de, 112metalworkers’ strike, 112–14, 116

military dictatorship, 1964–1985, 84, 109

Minha Casa Minha Vida (MCMV, My House My Life), 11, 12, 60, 84–8, 153, 154, 157, 158, 176, 189, 190, 192, 193, 198, 201, 207, 213, 230, 231, 255, 256

Ministério das Cidades (Cities Ministry), 10, 59, 60, 60n14, 182, 185, 191, 191n15, 192, 194, 195, 208, 251, 252, 286

Ministério Público (MP, public prosecutor’s office), 156–8, 248, 255, 256, 269, 277

moradia digna (adequate housing), 21, 29, 38, 153, 164n27, 166–70, 172, 173, 230, 257, 272

Movimento Brasil Livre, 4Movimento de Trabalhadores Rurais

Sem Teto (MST, Rural Landless Workers’ Movement), 52–6, 58, 122, 130, 146, 155, 236, 237, 245

Movimento de Trabalhadores Sem Teto (MTST, Roofless Workers’ Movement), 13, 16, 17, 31, 60, 123, 130, 131, 136, 137, 146–8, 151–5, 158, 163, 165, 167, 168, 173–6, 183, 184, 187, 199, 201, 207, 213, 221, 229–31, 237, 255, 256, 277, 280

Movimento Passe Livre (MPL, Free Fare Movement), 1, 2, 4, 51, 100, 106, 131–6, 229, 288

Movimento Sem Teto do Centro (MSTC, Central São Paulo Roofless Movement), 29, 204, 211, 223n1, 228, 233–5, 237, 249

Movimento Vem Pra Rua, 4municipal housing council, 59, 181,

192, 205, 277

316 INDEX

mutirão (mutual self-help building), 54, 55, 144, 185, 192, 197, 198, 202, 212, 227, 232, 248

myth of rights, 155–62, 169

NNeves, Tancredo, 3n2, 112, 134,

134n24

Ooccupations of abandoned buildings,

14, 55, 57, 243, 251, 278Oliveira, Francisco de, 73, 79, 80, 83,

84, 95, 113Operação Lava Jato (Operation Car

Wash), 5o sonho da casa própria (the dream of

owning one’s own home), 79–85, 264

Pparticipatory budgeting, 69, 128, 182,

183, 183n1, 211participatory citizenship, 22, 155participatory policy councils, 109,

122, 218Partido Comunista do Brasil (PCdoB,

Communist Party of Brazil), 203, 204

Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira (PSDB, Brazilian Social Democracy Party), 137, 195, 199, 203, 205

Partido Democrático Social (PDS, Social Democratic Party), 111, 112

Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT, Workers’ Party), 4–6, 20, 22, 23, 53n13, 55, 57, 59, 60, 85, 91, 107n2, 112, 114–16, 123–31, 134–6, 138, 147, 153n15, 154,

156, 174–6, 188, 188n10, 189–92, 195, 199, 201, 206, 208–14, 217, 251, 255, 276, 279, 280, 289–91

Partido Progressista (PP, Progressive Party), 57, 191

Partido Socialismo e Liberdade (PSol, Socialism and Freedom Party), 130, 130n21, 134

Pastoral de Moradia, 53, 145Petrobras, 5, 6, 289politics of rights, 7, 16, 22, 23, 61,

143–76, 243, 258, 261, 269, 272, 277

Prestes Maia occupation, 31, 235, 244

RRecife, 23, 269–71República Velha (Old Republic), 73right to the centre, 23, 32, 61, 226,

257–9, 261, 272, 278, 281, 286–8

right to the city, 3, 7–9, 13, 21–4, 27–61, 65, 86, 88, 100, 131–4, 137, 138, 218, 222, 230, 257, 261, 272, 273, 282, 283, 286–8

Rio de Janeiro, 4n3, 45n8, 100n25, 223n2, 269

Rolnik, Raquel, 9, 45, 59, 68–77, 85, 97, 99, 106, 107, 132, 134, 191, 194, 195n21, 201, 208, 251, 252n45, 288

Rouseff, Dilma, 4, 5, 5n4, 6, 60, 86, 107, 116, 128–31, 135, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 221, 230, 231, 288–91

SSantos, Milton, 9, 77São Paulo, 1–3, 3n1, 4, 6, 7, 9–13,

15–18, 20–2, 27–9, 31, 32,

317INDEX

39–41, 49–61, 65–100, 105, 106, 107n2, 109, 110, 112–16, 118, 119, 121–3, 124n12, 129–33, 135–8, 143, 144n1, 145–7, 149, 151, 153, 158, 163, 168, 170–4, 176, 181, 182, 183n1, 188–90, 192, 193, 193n19, 194–6, 198, 201, 202, 205, 206, 208, 209, 213, 216, 221, 223–5, 226n7, 229–31, 238, 240, 247, 247n33, 251–3, 255, 257, 261–4, 269–72, 276–9, 282, 286–8, 291, 292

São Paulo centre, 10São Paulo master plan, 240, 269São Paulo municipal government, 201,

202, 205, 206São Paulo peripheries, 9, 10, 12,

22, 55, 65, 69, 70, 72, 83, 113, 223

São Paulo trades unions, 105Scheingold, Stuart, 16, 22, 61, 160,

161, 161n24, 162, 163, 169, 243, 258

Serra, José, 60, 196, 203, 204, 212Shklar, Judith, 158, 160Situationist International, 286social function of property, 49, 244,

278, 281social housing, 11, 12, 29, 31, 50, 51,

56, 58, 60, 80, 150, 153, 156, 170, 175, 224, 227, 233, 240, 241, 247n32, 250, 255, 278

social rights, 31–41, 109, 134, 143, 164, 166, 169, 172, 173, 263, 265–7, 269, 271

Sousa Santos, Boaventura de, 23, 78, 261, 269, 271

Suplicy, Marta, 59, 91, 128, 188, 201, 203–5, 208, 209, 211–13, 217, 252n46, 276, 279, 279n7, 280

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),

TTarrow, Sidney, 55, 120, 238, 240Thoreau, Henry, 238–40Tilly, Charles, 55, 237, 238trade unions, 35, 80, 105, 114–16,

130, 290transgressive citizenship, 21, 23, 24,

52, 61, 261–92transition to democracy, 106, 107,

128, 262, 263, 266, 282

UUN-Habitat, 8, 45, 45n8, 257, 272União de Movimentos de Moradia

(UMM, Federation of Housing Movements), 12–18, 18n10, 19, 20, 33n1, 34n2, 41, 52, 52n11, 53, 53n13, 54–61, 85, 113, 123–30, 134–7, 143, 144, 144n1, 145–50, 151, 152n10, 153n13, 154–8, 162, 163, 166, 166n31, 167n33, 168–70, 170n37, 172–4, 181, 182, 184–6, 188, 189, 191, 191n15, 192–9, 201–5, 205n27, 206–11, 213, 214, 214n39, 215n42, 216, 217, 221, 222, 226–9, 231, 232, 234, 237, 241, 243, 245, 247, 248, 250–4, 256, 257, 267–9, 271, 273, 276, 279, 279n7, 280, 280n10, 281, 291

União Nacional por Moradia Popular (UNMP, National Union for Popular Housing), 13, 150n4, 151n7, 151n9, 152n10, 254

utopianism, 24, 283–7

VVargas, Getúlio, 76, 79–81, 109n3,

116, 263, 267n4

318 INDEX

WWorld Cup, 1–4, 13, 20–2, 51, 73n15,

86, 96–100, 133, 134, 136, 138, 173, 221, 222, 229–31

ZZona Especial de Interesse Social

(ZEIS, Zones of Special Social interest), 156