binary rs and dynamic asset allocation

19
Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation Kevin G. Hockert, CMT Prospero Institute for Investors 11.26.2012 [email protected] 320-762-0175

Upload: ann-treacy

Post on 02-Jul-2015

441 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Kevin G. Hockert, CMTProspero Institute for Investors

[email protected] 320-762-0175

Page 2: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Important financial market relationships

• Bonds – Yield Curve

• Treasury Bonds vs. Invest. Grade Corporate

• Invest. Grade Corporate vs. High Yield

• Stocks vs. Bonds

• Large vs. Small

• US equity vs. International Equity

• Value vs. Growth

Page 3: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Applications of RS

• Optimize returns available from a broad universe of securities Ranking/Rotation - universe of growth stocks i.e. IBD, Sector Rotation

• Dynamic Asset Allocation

• Binary – isolate 2 markets that encompass important market relationships

Page 4: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Components of TrendScore

• Short term trend • Intermediate term trend• Long term trend• Intermediate term momentum• Long term momentum• Intermediate term relative strength• Long term relative strength

Page 5: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Definition of components

• Trend – position of price relative to past

• Momentum = acceleration or deceleration in trend

• Relative Strength = performance of a security relative to a market index and/or universe of securities

Page 6: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Binary RS

• Data set is confined to 2 markets & encompasses IMPORTANT market relationships

• Utilize Intermediate or Long Term RS

• Long Term Trend

• Price divided by Price

• Smooth data (exponential moving averages)

• Relationships

• Level and direction = Momentum of RS

Page 7: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

S&P 500 vs. Russell 20001971-2012

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

RS

SPX

RUT

Page 8: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Variance in 13 Week Returns Style and Market Cap

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

Mid Value-Mid Growth

Mid Growth-Small Val

Small Value-Small Growth

Small Value-Large Value

Large Value-Large Growth

Page 9: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

13 Week Correlations & Standard Deviation of Variance

• Mid Value-Mid Growth 90.65%

• Mid Growth-Small Value 85.78%

• Small Value-Small Growth 92.89%

• Small Value-Large Value 91.96%

• Large Value-Large Growth 87.34%

• Mid Value-Mid Growth 4.7%

• Mid Growth-Small Value 5.9%

• Small Value-Small Growth 4.2%

• Small Value-Large Value 4.2%

• Large Value-Large Growth 5.1%

Page 10: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

RS Line IVW/IVEwhen direction is up

growth outperforming value

0.985

0.990

0.995

1.000

1.005

1.010

1.015

1.020

1.025

1/4

/20

10

2/4

/20

10

3/4

/20

10

4/4

/20

10

5/4

/20

10

6/4

/20

10

7/4

/20

10

8/4

/20

10

9/4

/20

10

10

/4/2

01

0

11

/4/2

01

0

12

/4/2

01

0

1/4

/20

11

2/4

/20

11

3/4

/20

11

4/4

/20

11

5/4

/20

11

6/4

/20

11

7/4

/20

11

8/4

/20

11

9/4

/20

11

10

/4/2

01

1

11

/4/2

01

1

12

/4/2

01

1

1/4

/20

12

2/4

/20

12

3/4

/20

12

4/4

/20

12

5/4

/20

12

6/4

/20

12

7/4

/20

12

8/4

/20

12

9/4

/20

12

10

/4/2

01

2

11

/4/2

01

2

Page 11: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Large Value vs. Large Growth

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

RS

IVW

IVE

Page 12: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Large Value vs. Large Growth

Year RS IVW IVE

2001 -11.16% -11.11% -10.95%

2002 3.75% -24.80% -21.93%

2003 32.43% -6.96% 2.28%

2004 11.51% 7.65% 16.76%

2005 5.37% 5.54% 7.53%

2006 14.89% 7.69% 16.17%

2007 2.68% 5.34% 1.97%

2008 -37.96% -37.54% -42.71%

2009 37.22% 36.90% 27.25%

2010 16.66% 13.94% 12.91%

2011 9.77% 4.79% 0.40%

2012 14.66% 13.41% 13.52%

Page 13: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Large Value vs. Large Growth Long Term Trend Filter

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

RS

IVW

IVE

Page 14: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Mid Growth vs. Small Value

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

RS

IJK

IJS

Page 15: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Mid Growth vs. Small Value

Year RS IJK IJS

2001 3.55% -7.16% 13.16%

2002 -12.45% -20.37% -15.91%

2003 15.50% 3.64% 18.38%

2004 15.65% 13.51% 22.73%

2005 16.24% 15.82% 7.99%

2006 9.45% 3.60% 14.87%

2007 12.67% 13.55% -4.90%

2008 -13.30% -40.87% -33.21%

2009 51.29% 49.70% 30.43%

2010 27.75% 28.86% 23.47%

2011 -1.20% -1.06% -1.19%

2012 14.13% 13.72% 10.49%

Page 16: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

EFA vs. SPY

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

RS

EFA

SPY

Page 17: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

Stocks vs. BondsSPY vs. IEF

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

RS

IEF

SPY

Page 18: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

References

• Cooper, Tony; 2011, Optimal Rotational Strategies using combined Technical and Fundamental Analysis

• Fama, Eugene F.; French Kenneth R. 1992, Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns, Journal of Finance

• Fama, Eugene F.; French Kenneth R. 1993, Common Risk Factors in the returns of stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics

Page 19: Binary RS and Dynamic Asset Allocation

For more informationcontact: Kevin G. Hockert, CMT

[email protected]

320-762-0175