bio432 topic(s) for 2nd paper: mating system evolutionary ecology kin selection non-kin cooperation...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
Bio432Bio432
Topic(s) for 2nd paper:Topic(s) for 2nd paper:
Mating system evolutionary ecologyMating system evolutionary ecology
Kin selectionKin selection
Non-kin cooperationNon-kin cooperation
Cultural evolutionCultural evolution
See references on course webpageSee references on course webpage
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Behavior Behavior
Directly Affects Population DynamicsDirectly Affects Population Dynamics
Indirectly Affects Extinction RiskIndirectly Affects Extinction Risk
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Intensity of Sexual SelectionIntensity of Sexual Selection
Behavior & Morphology Advance MatingBehavior & Morphology Advance Mating
Also Impose Mortality CostsAlso Impose Mortality Costs
Increase Extinction Risk (?)Increase Extinction Risk (?)
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Sexually Selected Behavior/MorphologySexually Selected Behavior/Morphology
Mortality Costs: Mortality Costs:
Increased PredationIncreased Predation
Greater Aggressive InjuryGreater Aggressive Injury
Greater Parasite LoadGreater Parasite Load
Testosterone, ImmunityTestosterone, Immunity
Greater Population Sensitivity toGreater Population Sensitivity to
Demographic Stochasticity (?)Demographic Stochasticity (?)
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Sexually selected traits impose survival costsSexually selected traits impose survival costs
Birds: assumed dichotomyBirds: assumed dichotomy
Dichromatic/Monochromatic spp Dichromatic/Monochromatic spp Strong/weak sexual selectionStrong/weak sexual selection
Dichromatic: Males bright; Females dullDichromatic: Males bright; Females dull
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Given hypothesis, predict extinction rates Given hypothesis, predict extinction rates higher dichromatic populations/specieshigher dichromatic populations/species
Suggestion: species introduced Pacific islandsSuggestion: species introduced Pacific islands
dichromatic spp more likely to go extinct dichromatic spp more likely to go extinct than monochromatic sppthan monochromatic spp
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Predict spp with elaborate secondary sexual Predict spp with elaborate secondary sexual traits would occur in taxa with traits would occur in taxa with
lowlow species richness species richness
ExtinctionsExtinctions due to sexual selection due to sexual selection
erode number of specieserode number of species
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Birds: Opposite resultBirds: Opposite result
Dichromatism correlates positivelyDichromatism correlates positively
with species numberwith species number
Sexual selection, thru mating preferences,Sexual selection, thru mating preferences,
promotes promotes speciationspeciation in birds in birds
Need ecological, not Need ecological, not evolutionaryevolutionary, test, test
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Doherty Doherty et alet al. 2003. PNAS 100:5858.. 2003. PNAS 100:5858.
North American BBSNorth American BBS
Continent wide, 40 km transects,50 stopsContinent wide, 40 km transects,50 stops
21 consecutive years21 consecutive years
185 monochromatic spp, 153 dichromatic spp185 monochromatic spp, 153 dichromatic spp
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Estimated Estimated Extinction RatesExtinction Rates
Spp lost time Spp lost time tt to time ( to time (t t + 1)/Spp at time + 1)/Spp at time tt
Estimated Estimated Turnover RatesTurnover Rates
New spp at time (New spp at time (tt + 1)/Spp at time ( + 1)/Spp at time (tt + 1) + 1)
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Comparisons: differences in each route,Comparisons: differences in each route,
averaged over time (spatial effect)averaged over time (spatial effect)
> 4000 observations> 4000 observations
Extinction rate differencesExtinction rate differences
Dichromatic spp:Dichromatic spp:
23% higher local rate23% higher local rate
.079 vs .064 per year.079 vs .064 per year
Rate diff (di – mono) =Rate diff (di – mono) =
.015 .015 .002 > 0 .002 > 0
Significant differenceSignificant difference
Turnover rate differencesTurnover rate differences
Dichromatic spp:Dichromatic spp:
25 % higher local rate25 % higher local rate
.076 vs .061 per year.076 vs .061 per year
Significant differenceSignificant difference
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Avian sexual dichromatismAvian sexual dichromatism
linked to sexual selectionlinked to sexual selection
Greater predation, parasitism, rep. skewGreater predation, parasitism, rep. skew
Higher rates local extinction (as predicted)Higher rates local extinction (as predicted)
but higher rates of colonizationbut higher rates of colonization
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Mating systems and Mating systems and
conservation of exploited marine fishconservation of exploited marine fish
Worldwide decline commercial fisheriesWorldwide decline commercial fisheries
2020thth Century: 50 spp too rare for economic viability Century: 50 spp too rare for economic viability
N Atlantic sharks declined 75% since 1986N Atlantic sharks declined 75% since 1986
Atlantic cod declined 90% last 35 yearsAtlantic cod declined 90% last 35 years
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Fishery management: “ecological”Fishery management: “ecological”
Temporal abundanceTemporal abundance
Age/size distributionAge/size distribution
Geographic distributionGeographic distribution
Adequate stocks large; assumed that if stock Adequate stocks large; assumed that if stock collapses, recovery from reducedcollapses, recovery from reduced fishingfishing
Assumption failedAssumption failed
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Rowe & Jennings. 2003. Rowe & Jennings. 2003. TREE TREE 18:567.18:567.
Collapsed population: need understand behaviorCollapsed population: need understand behavior
Mating system, impact of fishing on matingMating system, impact of fishing on mating
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Not all individuals equally susceptible to effortNot all individuals equally susceptible to effort
Fishing targets largest, most active in populationFishing targets largest, most active in population
Alter phenotype distributionAlter phenotype distribution
If heritableIf heritable, selection pressure, selection pressure
Can alter operational sex ratio, Can alter operational sex ratio,
if one sex more likely to be caughtif one sex more likely to be caught
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Fishery: focus on breeding aggregationsFishery: focus on breeding aggregations
Loss of males can reduce fertilization of ovaLoss of males can reduce fertilization of ova
Satellite male systemsSatellite male systems
Territorial male systemsTerritorial male systems
Disruption of dominance relationshipsDisruption of dominance relationships
Aggression among males can delay female Aggression among males can delay female mate choice, egg release (viability cost)mate choice, egg release (viability cost)
Behavior Behavior Population Dynamics Population Dynamics
Density-dependent reproductionDensity-dependent reproduction
Assumed logistic-like: maximal at minimal densityAssumed logistic-like: maximal at minimal density
Search for mates may produceSearch for mates may produce
Allee effect, depensationAllee effect, depensation