biofuels and international trade: the european perspective · bioethanol 129 142 164 243 413 340...
TRANSCRIPT
Biofuels and International Trade:The European perspective
Laurent Javaudin
Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.
2US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
27 Member States
490 million people
The European Union
3US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Outline
1- The rationale behind the EU biofuels mandate
2- EU policy instruments and the 10% marketshare target for biofuels by 2020
3- Implications for trade, standards andsustainability
4- Conclusion
4US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Why a target for biofuels? (1)Reduction in CO2 emissions
Greenhouse gas emissions (tCO2eq/toe). Source: JRC/EUCAR/Concawe
3,7
2
0,7
3,4
2,42
0,4
1,2
diesel biodiesel
from rape
second-
generation:
BTL from
farmed
wood
petrol bioethanol
from sugar
beet
bioethanol
from wheat
bioethanol
from sugar
cane
(imported)
second-
generation:
ligno-
cellulosic
ethanol from
farmed
wood
5US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Why a target for biofuels? (2)Oil Dependence
Biofuels cost more than fossil transport fuels, but in themedium term they are the only way to reduce oildependence in transport: it is available now, on a largescale
Signals for the future:
– Car makers need a signal to build for high biofuelblends;
– industry needs a signal to invest in second generation;
– the oil market needs a signal that we are serious aboutalternatives
6US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Outline
1- The rationale behind the EU biofuels mandate
2- EU policy instruments and the 10% marketshare target for biofuels by 2020
3- Implications for trade, standards andsustainability
4- Conclusion
7US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
EU policy frameworkfor renewable energy
Policy papers and legislation adopted
► Fuel Quality Directive - March 2003
► Biofuels Directive – May 2003
► Energy taxation Directive – October 2003
► Biomass Action Plan – December 2005
► Biofuels Strategy – February 2006
► EU “Climate Change and Energy” Package – 23 Jan 2008
8US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Climate Change andRenewable Energy Package
► Centerpiece: Decision on 20% reduction in CO2emissions (30% if the US, China, and India makesimilar commitments) with 1990 as base year;Directive on cap-and-trade program ETS
► Communication on 20% increase in energyefficiency;
► Communication on Carbon capture and storage;
► Renewable Energy Directive (solar, wind, hydro-electric, biomass): legally binding target of 20% forthe share of RE in EU energy consumption by 2020(8.5% in 2005).
9US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Climate Change andRenewable Energy Package
► Biofuels:
Art. 3.3: Legally binding minimum target of 10%for all MS by 2020 (1% in 2005)
Sustainable production of biofuels
Art. 4: National Action Plans on how to achievetargets (no later than 30 March 2010)
► No interim binding target
► All fuel stations should be obliged to sell (Art. 18):
►A 7% biodiesel blend by the end of 2010
►A 10% biodiesel blend by the end of 2014
10US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Biodiesel 340 451 580 956 1440
Bioethanol 129 142 164 243 413
340
451
580
956
1440
413
243
142 164129
0100200300400500600700800900
100011001200130014001500
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
inm
illio
ngallo
ns
EU biofuels production: strongincreases from a low basis
Capacity:2.4 b g by2007
Capacity:1.7 b g by2008
11US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Crops for biofuels:share of total production
40%
50%
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10
00
Tn
Rapeseed Cereals Sugarbeet Wine alcohol
2004 2005 2006 (estimation)
0,4%
1,5 %
0,8%
5%
38%
41%
60%
12US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
3.8
2.2
1.0 0.90.7
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.30.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ger
man
y
Sweden
Franc
e
Austri
a
Lith
uania
Malta
Italy
Polan
d
Spain
Slove
nia
Latvia
UK
Hungar
y
Czech
Republ
ic
Ireland
TheNeth
erlands
Luxe
mbo
urg
Cypru
s
Eston
ia
Portu
gal
Belgium
►EU: 1% market share
Biofuels in EU Member States% of road transport fuels (2005)
13US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Outline
1- The rationale behind the EU biofuels mandate
2- EU policy instruments and the 10% marketshare target for biofuels by 2020
3- Implications for trade, standards andsustainability
4- Conclusion
14US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Impact of the 10% target:Key assumptions
► Agricultural policies as of March 2007
► World Market price : FAPRI-OECD (projections incorporate part of biofuelpolicies of other countries)
► 55% of consumption of transport fuel in 2020 would be Diesel
10% share for biofuels: 11 b gallons (35 Mio t) biofuels in 2020, i.e.
5.7b gallons Biodiesel (19 Mio t),
5.3b gallons Bioethanol (16 Mio t)
► Second generation biofuels assumed to cover 30% of domestic needs by2020
► Import share of 25% for second generation feedstocks (wood chips fromtemperate climate zones)
► Production of biodiesel would remain in the EU
Imports of feedstocks and ethanol are a result of the analysis – No legal limiton the share provided by imported material
15US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Sources of feedstock forbiofuels production in 2020
(5.7b gallons)(5.3b gallons)
http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/markets/biofuel/impact042007/index_en.htm
16US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Biofuels standards andInternational Trade
1. International Standards for Biofuels
Brazil, the US and the EU have established expertworking groups on international compatibleStandards for biodiesel and bioethanol.
2. The International Biofuels Forum
Brazil, the US, China, India, South Africa & the EUhave created the IBF aiming to facilitateinternational trade of biofuels
17US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
► Most biofuels bring environmental benefits but….
high-GHG biofuels production pathways
Risks for biodiversity (forests, high value areas )
► The EU Directive (Art.15) establishes 4 sustainability criteria to avoid:
“Bad” performing biofuels in terms of GHG savings– at least 35% (including GHG effect of land-use changes) relative to
their fossil fuel equivalent to count towards the 10% target
Use of Land of high biodiversity value in January 2008 (ex: Forestuntouched by man, protected areas, highly bio diverse grasslands)
land use changes leading to loss of soil carbon stocks (forests,wetlands)
Feedstock produced not using best agricultural practices
Commission to monitor the impact of EU biofuels policy on food prices,and food supplies in developing countries (Art. 20).
Biofuels:the sustainability criteria
18US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
3 Formulae to calculate the GHG impact (art 17):
► Default values (Annex VII) – subject to review in the future. For instance:
► Sugar beet ethanol 35%
► EU-produced corn ethanol 49%
► Sugar cane ethanol 74%
► Rapeseed biodiesel 36%
► Palm oil biodiesel with no methane emissions51%
► Actual costs/ savings in the production pathway (including fromprocessing, transportation and distribution)
► Mix of actual costs/ saving and default values
2nd Generation biofuels should be given twice as much as 1st generationbiofuels in contributing towards national target on overall renewableenergy
Commission to produce a report in 2010 and 2012 assessing whether thesystem is working/ could be improved
Biofuels:the sustainability criteria
19US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Outline
1- The rationale behind the EU biofuels mandate
2- EU policy instruments and the 10% marketshare target for biofuels by 2020
3- Implications for trade, standards andsustainability
4- Conclusion
20US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
Renewable energy: a key element of a sustainable future
– Significant reduction of GHG emissions
– New opportunities for Energy security, rural economies
Concerns about environmental risks and market imbalancesmust be taken seriously, but
– The 10% minimum target can be achieved withoutunmanageable tensions between food, feed and energymarkets
– Opportunities for International trade, but Productionpathways and land use with undesirable consequenceswill be discouraged
Conclusion
21US Chamber of Commerce – Washington DC - 29 January 2008
EC President Barroso – Building a global low carbon economy:http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/president/focus/energy-package-2008/index_en.htm
DG Energy and Transport web site:http://europa.eu.int/comm/energy/index_en.html
Energy research web site:http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/energy/index_en.html
Factsheet - Biofuels in the european union: an agricultural perspectivehttp://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/biofuel/2007_en.pdf
DG Agriculture and Rural Developmenthttp://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/biomass/biofuel/index_en.htm
Thank you for your attention [email protected]
Staying informed