biogears iccai poster

1
Predictive Analytics for Patient Monitoring Methodology Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) Prediction Results Predicting with Point of Contact Detailed Comparison(s) of Test Set Specimens Aggregated Prediction and Error Input Data. The USAISR provided data for 35 swine models with severe hemorrhages withdrawing ~65% of blood volume prior to intervention. The Integrated Data Exchange and Archival (IDEA) system recorded 131 time series values electronically from: the Drager Infinity Delta patient monitor (D), the Edwards EV1000 (E), and the Aesculon critical care monitor (A). We randomly split our specimens into two pools for training (66%) and testing (33%) our learned model. Machine Learning. We used Principle Component Analysis / Singular Value Decomposition to calculate eigenvalues and eigenvectors to down-select and weight 27 variables to train four Autoregressive Linear Models for 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes out predictions: Mean % Error We compare Actual MAP measures to CARP predictions made 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes before, from start of bleed to nadir. Forecasting the Trajectory of Blood Loss from Vital Signs Collected at the Bedside Objective: We developed and evaluated CARP, a Principle Component Analysis driven Autoregressive time series model that forward predicts Arterial Blood Pressure during a hemorrhage event. Our input data (previously collected by the US Army Institute of Surgical Research) included 131 time series values recorded or derived during a test procedure (described below). We down selected the input for our model to 27 variables. Data were recorded electronically using custom software (Integrated Data Exchange and Archival, IDEA). Conclusion: We showed high correlation of Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) prediction at short term (with a 2.37% and -1.9% prediction percent difference error for 1 and 5 min respectively), and moderate correlation at long term predictions (with a -4.98% and -6.72% prediction average percent difference error for 10 and 15 min respectively) using our CARP algorithm. This implies that the model, on average, slightly under-predicts MAP for long term predictions The incorporation of such algorithms in a bedside monitoring platform or in a medical professional’s field monitoring device could inform providers of critical decline in blood pressure leading to timely live-saving interventions. Charles E Fisher 1 , Randall J Frank 1 , Chris Petrovitch 1 , Eddie Oxford 1 , Chris Argenta 1 , William L Baker Jr 2 , Timothy S. Park 2 , Daniel S Wendroff 2 , Leopoldo C Cancio 2 , Andriy I Batchinsky 2,3 , Jeremy C Pamplin 2 1 Applied Research Associates, Raleigh NC 2 US Army Institute for Surgical Research, San Antonio TX 3 Geneva Foundation The data collected for this work was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC) in Fort Detrick, MD under Contract Number: W81XWH-13-2-0068. Charles E Fisher Applied Research Associates 8537 Six Forks Road Suite 600 Raleigh, NC 27615 (919) 582-3300 [email protected] Dimensionality reduction and weighting for models. The R-squared values monotonically decreased as the forecasting time increased. They dropped from 0.9 (forecasting 1 minute ahead) to 0.7 (forecasting 15 minutes into the future). All 12 of the projected feature vectors used in the models are significant using an α of 0.05. BioGears® is a full body physiological modeling tool. It models of various systems as integrated RC circuits. The BioGears® Cardiovascular Model is a closed-loop system representing systemic behavior, pulmonary circulation, and the heart’s dynamic pumping. This model is based on Guyton's four-compartment (three vascular, plus one heart) model of the CV System. This model has been validated at resting and a variety of cardiovascular related insults and interventions. See www.biogearsengine.com for details. We scaled our test specimens to the expected human ranges and generated MAP values for a similar hemorrhage event using the fixed model in BioGears®. This RC model simulates expected physiology, while the CARP model responds directly to the specifics of the sensor readings live. Original Data Cleaned Data Training Set Test Set PCA ~200 Attributes 27 Attributes 12 Eigenvectors Train Linear Regression Apply Linear Regression P i β i MAP Prediction CARP

Upload: biogearsengine

Post on 11-Apr-2017

236 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BioGears ICCAI Poster

Predictive Analytics for Patient Monitoring

Methodology

Mean Arterial Pressure (M

AP) Prediction Results

Predicting with

Point of Contact

Detailed Comparison(s) of Test Set Specim

ensAggregated Prediction and Error

InputData.

TheU

SAISRprovided

datafor

35sw

inem

odelswith

severehem

orrhageswithdraw

ing~65%

ofblood

volume

priorto

intervention.The

IntegratedData

Exchangeand

Archival(IDEA)

systemrecorded

131tim

eseries

valueselectronically

from:the

DragerInfinity

Deltapatientm

onitor(D),theEdw

ardsEV1000

(E),and

theAesculon

criticalcare

monitor

(A).W

erandom

lysplit

ourspecim

ensinto

two

poolsfor

training(66%

)andtesting

(33%)ourlearned

model.

Machine

Learning.W

eused

PrincipleCom

ponentAnalysis

/Singular

ValueDecom

positionto

calculateeigenvalues

andeigenvectors

todow

n-selectand

weight27

variablesto

trainfourAutoregressive

LinearM

odelsfor1,5,10,and15

minutes

outpredictions:

Mean % Error

We com

pare Actual MAP m

easures to CARP predictions made 1, 5, 10, and 15 m

inutes before, from start of bleed to nadir.

Forecasting the Trajectory of Blood Loss from Vital Signs Collected at the Bedside

Objective:

We

developedand

evaluatedCARP,a

PrincipleCom

ponentAnalysisdriven

Autoregressivetim

eseries

modelthatforw

ardpredicts

ArterialBloodPressure

duringa

hemorrhage

event.Our

inputdata

(previouslycollected

bythe

US

Army

Instituteof

SurgicalResearch)included

131tim

eseries

valuesrecorded

orderivedduring

atestprocedure

(describedbelow

).We

down

selectedthe

inputforourmodelto

27variables.Data

were

recordedelectronically

usingcustom

software

(IntegratedData

Exchangeand

Archival,IDEA).

Conclusion:W

eshow

edhigh

correlationofM

eanArterialPressure

(MAP)prediction

atshort

term(w

itha

2.37%and

-1.9%prediction

percentdifference

errorfor1and

5m

inrespectively),and

moderate

correlationatlong

termpredictions

(with

a-4.98%

and-6.72%

predictionaverage

percentdifferenceerror

for10and

15m

inrespectively)using

ourCARPalgorithm

.Thisim

pliesthatthe

model,on

average,slightlyunder-predicts

MAP

forlongterm

predictionsThe

incorporationof

suchalgorithm

sin

abedside

monitoring

platformor

ina

medicalprofessional’s

fieldm

onitoringdevice

couldinform

providersof

criticaldecline

inblood

pressureleading

totim

elylive-saving

interventions.

Charles E Fisher 1, Randall J Frank1, Chris Petrovitch

1, Eddie Oxford

1, Chris Argenta1,

William

L Baker Jr 2, Timothy S. Park 2, Daniel S W

endroff 2, Leopoldo C Cancio2, Andriy

I Batchinsky2,3, Jerem

y C Pamplin

2

1Applied Research Associates, Raleigh NC 2U

S Army Institute for Surgical Research, San Antonio TX 3Geneva Foundation

Thedata

collectedfor

thisw

orkw

assupported

bythe

U.S.Arm

yM

edicalResearch

andM

aterielCom

mand

(USAM

RMC)

inFort

Detrick,M

Dunder

ContractN

umber:W

81XWH-13-2-0068.

Charles E FisherApplied Research Associates

8537 Six Forks Road Suite 600Raleigh, N

C 27615(919) 582-3300

[email protected]

Dimensionality reduction and w

eighting for models.

TheR-squared

valuesm

onotonicallydecreased

asthe

forecastingtim

eincreased.

Theydropped

from0.9

(forecasting1

minute

ahead)to

0.7(forecasting

15m

inutesinto

thefuture).

All12ofthe

projectedfeature

vectorsused

inthe

modelsare

significantusingan

αof0.05.

BioGears®is

afullbody

physiologicalmodeling

tool.It

modelsofvarioussystem

sasintegratedRC

circuits.The

BioGears®Cardiovascular

Modelis

aclosed-loop

systemrepresenting

systemic

behavior,pulm

onarycirculation,

andthe

heart’sdynam

icpum

ping.This

modelis

basedon

Guyton'sfour-com

partment(three

vascular,plusoneheart)m

odeloftheCV

System.This

modelhas

beenvalidated

atresting

anda

varietyof

cardiovascularrelatedinsultsand

interventions.See

ww

w.biogearsengine.com

fordetails.W

escaled

ourtestspecimens

tothe

expectedhum

anranges

andgenerated

MAP

valuesfor

asim

ilarhem

orrhageevent

usingthe

fixedm

odelin

BioGears®.This

RCm

odelsim

ulatesexpected

physiology,w

hilethe

CARPm

odelrespondsdirectly

tothe

specificsofthesensorreadingslive.

OriginalData

CleanedData

TrainingSet

TestSet

PCA

~200 Attributes

27 Attributes

12 Eigenvectors

TrainLinear

Regression

ApplyLinear

RegressionP

i

MAP

Prediction

CARP