bloom’s taxonomy investigating cognitive complexity

26
B l o o m s B l o o m s T a x o n o m y T a x o n o m y I n v e s t i g a t i n g C o g n i t i v e C o m p l e x i t y Heartland AEA Curriculum Network January 8, 2010

Upload: billy

Post on 17-Feb-2016

93 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity. Heartland AEA Curriculum Network January 8, 2010. Bloom’s KUD. K now 6 levels of cognitive processes of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 4 knowledge dimensions of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy U nderstand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Bloo

m’s

Bl

oom

’s

Taxo

n om

yTa

xono

my

Inv e

stig

a tin

g C o

g nit i

ve

Com

p lex

ity

Heartland AEACurriculum Network

January 8, 2010

Page 2: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Bloom’s KUDKnow 6 levels of cognitive processes of Bloom’s

Revised Taxonomy 4 knowledge dimensions of Bloom’s Revised

TaxonomyUnderstand Achieving complexity in questions and tasks is

essential to deeper, more durable learning.Do Apply Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy ICC

Concepts and Skills

Page 3: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Discuss at your table…1. What makes a task, question or

objective “good”? 2. Why is it important for teachers to meet

these criteria in their instruction?3. What are the consequences when they

don’t?4. What would you see and hear in a

classroom where higher-order thinking and questioning are occurring?

5. What would happen to student learning if teachers and students functioned at higher-order levels?

Page 4: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What are the 6 levels of Bloom’s?

Can you put them in order -

low to high?

Page 5: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Revision At-a-GlanceO r i g i n a l T e r m s N e w T e r m s

• E v a l u a t i o n

• S y n t h e s i s

• A n a l y s i s

• A p p l i c a t i o n

• C o m p r e h e n s i o n

• K n o w l e d g e

• C r e a t i n g

• E v a l u a t i n g

• A n a l y s i n g

• A p p l y i n g

• U n d e r s t a n d i n g

• R e m e m b e r i n g

( B a s e d o n P o h l , 2 0 0 0 , L e a r n i n g t o T h i n k , T h i n k i n g t o L e a r n , p . 8 )

Page 6: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

UNDERSTANDINGSThese are conceptual objectives for students

that Represent big ideas that have enduring

value beyond the classroom Reside at the heart of the discipline and

are worthy of exploration Require “uncoverage” rather than

coverage (of abstract or often misunderstood ideas)

Offer potential for engaging students--Wiggins & McTighe, UbD, 1998

Page 7: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Six Facets of Understanding When we truly understand we

– Can explain– Can interpret– Can apply– Have perspective– Display empathy– Have self-knowledge

--Tomlinson & McTighe, 2006, p. 67

Page 8: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

The Knowledge Dimension Factual

– Terminology– Details & Elements

Conceptual– Classifications & Categories– Principles & Generalizations– Theories, Models, & Structures

Page 9: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

The Knowledge Dimension Procedural

– Subject-specific skills & algorithms– Subject-specific techniques & methods– Criteria for determining when to use

appropriate procedures Metacognitive

– Strategic knowledge– Contextual & conditional knowledge– Self-knowledge

Page 10: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

The Taxonomy Table

Page 11: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Modeling

Page 12: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Example Generate criteria to judge the

quality of a question and use those criteria to critique a given set of questions.

Page 13: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

How it works…

Apply S(ubject) V(erb) O(bject) format

S = student (often implied) V = generate (create)

O = criteria to judge the quality of a question

V = critique (evaluate)

O = a set of questions

Generate criteria to judge the quality of a question and use those criteria to critique a given set of questions.

Page 14: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Generate criteria to judge the quality of a question and use those criteria to critique a

given set of questions.

Think Aloud

Page 15: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Science As Inquiry grades 6-8

Essential concept/skill Design and conduct different

kinds of scientific investigationsDetail Students use appropriate safety

procedures when conducting investigations

Focus on the detail

Page 16: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Students use appropriate safety procedures when conducting investigations.

Page 17: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

At Your Table: Decide on a content area, discipline, and grade span from the ICC. Chart

one of the details on the Taxonomy Table.

http://www.corecurriculum.iowa.gov

Page 18: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

ReflectingIn what ways will the lens of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy impact Iowa Core Curriculum work in your school/district?

Page 19: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

The following slides chart the level of Bloom’s for each of the questions at the beginning of the session today.

One important take-away is that a lesson doesn’t need to begin with low-level questions and/or tasks. Beginning with greater cognitive complexity establishes higher expectations.

Page 20: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What’s the Bloom’s Level?1. What makes a task, question or

objective “good”? 2. Why is it important for teachers to meet

these criteria in their instruction?3. What are the consequences when they

don’t?4. What would you see and hear in a

classroom where higher-order thinking and questioning are occurring?

5. What would happen to student learning if teachers and students functioned at higher-order levels?

Page 21: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What makes a task, question or objective

“good”?

Page 22: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Why is it important for teachers to meet these

criteria in their instruction?

Page 23: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What are the consequences when/if they

don’t?

Page 24: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What would you see and hear in a classroom where

higher-order thinking and

questioning are occurring?

Page 25: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

What would happen to student learning

if teachers and students functioned

at higher-order levels?

Page 26: Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity

Web Resourceshttp://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/slatta/hi216/learning/bloom.htmThis site provides an overview and graphic of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy.http://www.kurwongbss.eq.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/blooms.htm This is a site rich in Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy examples across subject areas. Many of the handouts you’ve seen today came from this site.http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/curric/newtaxonomy.htm This site offers a side-by-side comparison of the original and revised versions of Bloom’s Taxonomy.