boe district performance review 2017-18final · 2019-05-18 · district performance review jeffco...
TRANSCRIPT
DistrictPerformanceReview
JeffcoBoardofEducationSeptember7,2017
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeColorado 40 44 46 40 44 43 36Jeffco 45 52 52 52 51 51 44
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
Met
/Exc
eede
d E
xpec
tatio
ns
2016-17 Jeffco/ColoradoCMAS English Language Arts (ELA)
Achievement Comparison Percent Met/Exceeded
1
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade2015-2016 42 50 47 50 48 46 432016-2017 45 52 52 52 51 51 44
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
Met
/Exc
eede
d E
xpec
tatio
nsJeffco 2-Year Trend
CMAS ELA Achievement Percent Met/Exceeded
2
Jeffco CMAS Growth by SubgroupEnglish Language Arts
2016-17 Median Growth Percentile
3
EarlyLiteracy
Strengthsfrom2016-17:• AdditionalLiteracySupportforCOREandIntervention acrossthesystem:
○ LiteracyInterventionists, JSEL,LucyCalkinsReadingUnitsofStudy,iCALI,layeredcenters,DiscoveryReading/Writing/Thinking
○ ContentSpecialistsinschools(PLCsupports, professional learning),○ READActSupports
• InELACMAS:○ Allgradelevels increased inpercentofstudentswhometorexceeded
achievement expectations from2015-16○ Allgradelevels increased instudentgrowthfrom2015-16
Challenges for2017-18:• Dataamongsubgroups aremostlyunchanged • Increased demand formoreinstructionalsupport
4
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade*
Algebra 1**
Geometry**
Algebra 2**
Colorado 40 34 34 31 26 21 33 32 77Jeffco 47 40 41 41 33 20 42 75 91
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
Met
/Exc
eede
d E
xpec
tatio
ns2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado
CMAS MathematicsAchievement Comparison
Percent Met/Exceeded
*Approximately one-third of Jeffco eighth grade students are included in CMAS Algebra I and Geometry assessment results instead of the standard grade 8 math assessment, so state comparisons are not equivalent for the single assessment (grade 8 CMAS Math) in which Jeffco did not exceed state performance. **Algebra 1, Geometry, and Algebra 2 results are reflective of all students who took these assessments regardless of grade level (e.g. Geometry results include students in grades 8 and 9).
5
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade* Algebra 1**
Geometry**
Algebra 2**
2015-2016 45 39 42 41 35 19 40 75 832016-2017 47 40 41 41 33 20 42 75 91
0
20
40
60
80
100
Per
cent
Met
/Exc
eede
d E
xpec
tatio
nsJeffco 2-Year Trend
CMAS Math Achievement Percent Met/Exceeded
*Approximately one-third of Jeffco eighth grade students are included in CMAS Algebra I and Geometry assessment results instead of the standard grade 8 math assessment, so state comparisons are not equivalent for the single assessment (grade 8 CMAS Math) in which Jeffco did not exceed state performance. **Algebra 1, Geometry, and Algebra 2 results are reflective of all students who took these assessments regardless of grade level (e.g. Geometry results include students in grades 8 and 9).
6
Jeffco CMAS Growth by Subgroup: Mathematics
Median Growth Percentile
7
AlgebraicThinkingStrengthsfrom2016-17:• Successforacceleratedmathstudents• AdditionalContentSpecialists/Instructional Specialistspartnership in
planning• Additionalprofessional development offerings forteachers
Challenges for2017-18:• Gapbetween acceleratedandgradelevel students
– Percentageofstudentscompleting9th gradeAlgebraI• Dataamongsubgroups aremostlyunchanged • Increased demand formoreinstructionalsupport
8
2016-17 Jeffco/ColoradoCMAS Science Achievement Comparison
Percent Met or Exceeded
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeColorado 35% 30% 25%Jeffco 42% 40% 35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
en
t M
et o
r Exc
ee
de
d
9
Jeffco 2-Year TrendCMAS Science Achievement
Percent Met or Exceeded
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade2015-2016 41% 39% 34%2016-2017 42% 40% 35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
en
t M
et o
r Exc
ee
de
d
10
EBRW* Math Overall ScoreColorado 478 469 947Jeffco 494 486 980
320
520
720
920
1120
1320
1520
Me
an
Test
Sc
ore
2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado
Colorado PSAT Mean Test Score Comparison
* EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing. PSAT scale ranges from 320 to 1520.
11
EBRW Math Met Both2015-16 74% 50% 48%2016-17 74% 51% 49%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent
Me
etin
g B
enc
hma
rk
Jeffco Colorado PSATStudents Meeting CollegeReadiness Benchmarks
2016-17
• EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing.• According to College Board, SAT college and career readiness indicates a 75% likelihood of achieving at
least a C in related first-semester, credit-bearing college courses. The grade level benchmarks associated with the PSAT 10 are based on expected student growth toward the SAT benchmarks at each grade level.
*
12
EBRW* Math Overall ScoreColorado 513 501 1014Jeffco 536 526 1062
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Me
an
Test
Sc
ore
2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado
Colorado SAT Mean Test Score Comparison
* EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing. SAT scale ranges from 400 to 1600.
13
EBRW* Math Met Both2016-17 71% 51% 49%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent
Me
etin
g B
enc
hma
rk
2016-17 Jeffco Colorado SAT
Percent Meeting CollegeReadiness Benchmarks
• EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing• According to College Board, SAT college and career readiness indicates a 75% likelihood of
achieving at least a C in related first-semester, credit-bearing college courses. 14
JeffcoSATMedianGrowthbySubgroup
15
SAT Median Growth Percentiles compare student growth from Colorado PSAT in grade 10 to Colorado SAT in grade 11.
College&CareerReadyStrengthsfrom2016-17:• Jeffcoexceeds thestateinEBRW* andmathforPSAT/SAT
• 71%ofJeffco2017SATparticipantsreached theCollegeBoard’scollegeandcareer readiness benchmarkforevidence basedreadingandwriting
Challenges for2017-18:•Numberofstudents takingtheassessment arenotdemonstratingproficiency inEBRW* andMathematics
16* EBRW-Evidence Based Reading and Writing
NextSteps• Workwithteacherstocreateandimplementauthentictasks
• Prioritizesupportforlowachievingschools
• ImplementprofessionallearningtosupportthemeasurementofJeffcocompetencies
• Continuetobuildstaffcapacitytousestudentdataeffectivelyforinstructionalplanning
17
2017PerformanceReviewSubgroupPerformance
Appendix
18
2017CMAS/PARCCJeffco EnglishLanguageArts(ELA)
• Overall performance• Subgroups
o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Advanced Learning Plans (ALP)o Language Proficiency
19
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeN = 6,079 N = 6,124 N = 6,031 N = 6,035 N = 6,002 N = 5,979 N = 5,324
Exceeded 4% 14% 7% 9% 16% 11% 8%Met 41% 38% 45% 43% 35% 40% 36%Approached 24% 25% 25% 28% 24% 23% 27%Partially Met 16% 15% 15% 14% 15% 14% 17%Did Not Yet Meet 15% 8% 8% 6% 10% 11% 13%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
of S
tude
nts
Jeffco CMASELA Grades 3-9
2016 -17
Performance Expectations
20
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup- Gender
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeFemale 50% 58% 60% 60% 61% 62% 55%Male 41% 46% 45% 44% 42% 41% 34%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
21
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup- Ethnicity
2016-17
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
9th Grade
White 52% 58% 60% 58% 59% 58% 50%Hispanic 28% 34% 33% 34% 31% 31% 28%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
* Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.
22
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)
2016-17
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
9th Grade
FRL 26% 30% 28% 30% 27% 27% 25%No FRL 54% 62% 63% 62% 62% 61% 51%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
23
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)
2016-17
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
9th Grade
IEP 7% 10% 9% 10% 9% 8% 5%Exited IEP 36% 43% 48% 41% 49% 38% 32%No IEP 50% 57% 58% 58% 56% 56% 48%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent M
et o
r Exc
eede
d Ex
pect
atio
ns
24
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)
2016-17
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
9th Grade
ALP 83% 88% 90% 87% 87% 86% 79%No ALP 38% 44% 46% 45% 43% 41% 34%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
25
JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– LanguageProficiency
2016-17
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
9th Grade
NEP 3% 3% 0% 2% 4% 4% 0%LEP 22% 18% 9% 10% 10% 6% 9%FEP 83% 74% 67% 60% 58% 60% 53%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient
26
2017CMAS/PARCCJeffcoMathematicsResults
• Overall performance• Subgroups
o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Advanced Learning Plans (ALP)
27
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeN = 6,195 N = 6,017 N = 6,014 N = 6,088
Exceeded 11% 4% 7% 7%Met 36% 35% 34% 34%Approached 26% 28% 28% 28%Partially Met 16% 21% 20% 21%Did Not Yet Meet 12% 12% 11% 10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
sJeffco CMAS
Math Grades 3-62016-17
Performance Expectations
28
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup–Gender
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeFemale 46% 57% 40% 41%Male 48% 46% 42% 42%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
29
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– Ethnicity
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeWhite 55% 47% 48% 49%Hispanic 27% 20% 21% 20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
30
* Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeFRL 25% 19% 18% 18%No FRL 58% 50% 51% 52%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
31
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeIEP 11% 8% 10% 9%Exited IEP 42% 32% 40% 35%No IEP 41% 44% 45% 45%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
32
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)
2016-17
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeALP 88% 85% 87% 85%No ALP 39% 30% 33% 33%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
33
JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– LanguageProficiency
2016-17
• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeNEP 10% 6% 2% 0%LEP 25% 11% 6% 8%FEP 84% 59% 49% 42%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
34
7th Grade 8th Grade
7th Grade Math 7th Grade Algebra I 8th Grade Math 8th Grade Algebra I 8th Grade GeometryN = 5,817 N = 255 N = 3,791 N = 1,404 N = 321
Exceeded 3% 9% 0% 4% 17%Met 31% 83% 20% 71% 75%Approached 36% 7% 30% 20% 8%Partially Met 23% 1% 25% 4% 1%Did Not Yet Meet 8% 0% 25% 1% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
sJeffco CMAS
Math Grades 7-82016-17
Performance Expectations
35
9th Grade Algebra I 9th Grade Geometry 9th Grade Algebra IIN = 3,697 N = 1,209 N = 300
Exceeded 0% 6% 14%Met 22% 66% 76%Approached 32% 24% 8%Partially Met 30% 4% 1%Did Not Yet Meet 16% 1% 0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
sJeffco CMASMath Grade 9
2016-17
Performance Expectations
36
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII
Subgroup–Gender2016-17
• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
Female 33% 22% 63% 83% 91%Male 32% 18% 63% 80% 90%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
37
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII
Subgroup– Ethnicity2016-17
• Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.
• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
White 41% 25% 66% 83% 92%Hispanic 15% 9% 51% 74% 84%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
38
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII
Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)2016-17
• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
FRL 15% 9% 43% 73% 76%No FRL 43% 27% 67% 78% 91%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
39
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII
Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)2016-17
• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
IEP 6% 4% 11% 56% 100%Exited IEP 36% 17% 62% 83% 75%No IEP 36% 23% 64% 82% 76%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
40
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII
Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)2016-17
• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
ALP 80% 50% 79% 60% 93%No ALP 25% 18% 55% 46% 82%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
41
JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraIISubgroup– LanguageProficiency
2016-17
• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I,
Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.
7th Grade Math
8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
NEP 0% 6% 2% 33% 0%LEP 5% 3% 9% 43% 100%FEP 38% 26% 43% 65% 95%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
42
2017 JeffcoResultsCMAS Science
• Overall performance• Subgroups
o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Language Proficiency
43
• Due to CDE’s 3-year sampling model, CMAS Social Studies data have not been included since results do not represent districtwide performance.
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8, & 11Met or Exceeded Expectations
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade2015-16 41% 38% 34%2016-17 42% 40% 35%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Perc
en
t M
et o
r Exc
ee
de
d
44
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeFemale 42% 42% 33%Male 42% 38% 36%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup - Gender
2016-2017
45
* Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.
5rd Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeWhite 51% 48% 42%Hispanic 20% 18% 15%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup - Ethnicity
2016-2017
46
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeFRL 18% 15% 15%No FRL 54% 50% 42%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Free and Reduced Lunch
2016-2017
47
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeIEP 8% 5% 6%No IEP 46% 43% 37%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Individualized Education Program
2016-2017
48
5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeNEP 0% 4% 0%LEP 4% 3% 2%FEP 43% 40% 29%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Per
cent
Met
or E
xcee
ded
Exp
ecta
tions
Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Language Proficiency
2016-17
49
OurMissionand2020Vision
To provide a quality education that prepares all children for a successful future.
In order for students to pursue their life goals, by 2020 all Jeffco graduates will be able to apply the Jeffco 2020 competencies.
50