bokashi composting: performance monitoring presentation to wasteminz conference 16 october 2009 dr...

25
Bokashi Composting: Performance Monitoring Presentation to WasteMINZ Conference 16 October 2009 Dr Sean Barnes – Aurecon NZ Neville Burt – Bokashi NZ

Upload: tessa-sales

Post on 16-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Bokashi Composting: Performance Monitoring

Presentation to WasteMINZ Conference16 October 2009

Dr Sean Barnes – Aurecon NZNeville Burt – Bokashi NZ

Summary of Presentation

• Introduction and Research Drivers

• The Bokashi Process

• Our Methodology

• Results and Discussion

• Conclusions

• Where to From Here?

Introduction and Drivers

What is Bokashi?

Bokashi Composting

+

=

Decentralised Waste Treatment

HOUSEHOLDS:

COMMERCIAL:

ON-SITE USECOMMUNITY GARDENS

PARKS/RESERVESAGRICULTURE

The New Bigger Bokashi Bins

What Did We Monitor?

SOLIDS + COMPOST-ZING

LIQUID

BURIAL IN GARDEN/MEDIA

Analysis

• Key Nutrients

• Carbon

• Composition

The Trials

TRIAL 1 TRIAL 2

5 W

EE

KS

What Happened?

TRIAL 1

Composition of Juice

• Varied between trials and over time• Low pH – around 4 to 4.5• High COD (soluble) – 83,000 to 160,000mg/L• Nitrogen (ammonia) – 2,000mg/L +• Phosphorus (organic) – 1,400mg/L & 360mg/L +• Potassium – 2,600mg/L +

• Trends FERM 1 FERM 2

COD Generation

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Time (days)

Cu

mu

lati

ve s

olu

ble

CO

D g

ener

ated

(g

O2)

Ferm2 Ferm1

The Fermentation

• Trial 1 had higher nutrient and COD levels• High juice content from predominantly vegetable

waste in Trial 2 Differences based on feed material

• Juice production = waste volume reduction• Lactic acid production assumed

Liquid fertiliser (after pH adjustment)

Fermentation Microbes

Solid Polymeric Material

Macromolecules (e.g. Starch)

Monomers (e.g. Glucose)

Fermentation Products (e.g. Lactic Acid)

EM Microbes

• Lactic Acid Bacteria

• Photosynthetic Bacteria

• Yeasts

• Actinomycetes

Pathogens

• Faecal Coliforms

• Clostridium sp.

• Staphylococcus sp.

• Salmonella sp.

• Listeria sp.

Microbial Parameters (Liquid)

• High numbers of microbes (aerobic/anaerobic)• Faecal Coliforms and Escherichia coli present in

first sample of Trial 1 only

NO BAD GUYS!• Below Detection Limits Enterobacteriaceae,

Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella sp.

What Did We Monitor?

SOLIDS + COMPOST-ZING

LIQUID

BURIAL IN GARDEN/MEDIA

Analysis

• Key Nutrients

• Carbon

• Composition

Fermented Food Waste

5 Weeks Composting

Dry basis:

N 2.4% 0.9%

P 0.2% 0.1%

K 0.4% 0.5%

C 30% (Lit)Trial 1 @ 0 Weeks

Post-Burial Analysis (0 to 8 Weeks)

Org Matter:Trial 1: 38.6% to 46.2%Trial 2: 6.1% to 8.5%CTrial 1: 22.4% to 26.8%Trial 2: 3.5% to 4.9%NTrial 1: 1.2% to 1.7%Trial 2: 0.4% to 0.5%PTrial 1: 0.2% to 0.4%Trial 2: 0.2% slight increaseKTrial 1: 0.5% to 0.7%Trial 2: 0.2% to 0.3%

Trial 1 @ 4 Weeks

Conclusions

• Common food pathogens absent in juice samples after fermentation

• No discernable odour• High N, P and K content in juice + low pH• Solid material breaks down rapidly in soil or

compost pile• Further targeted testing of COD composition and

microbes on commercial systems.

Decentralised Waste Treatment

HOUSEHOLDS:

COMMERCIAL:

ON-SITE USECOMMUNITY GARDENS

PARKS/RESERVESAGRICULTURE

Where To From Here?

Waiheke Island – Mudbrick Vineyard, Te Whau Brasserie, Lure Vineyard, Café Get Stuffed

Hamilton (Back to Earth Programme)

Hanmer Springs (Business Association)

Waitakere City (Project Circle)

Standards To Be Met

• Resource Consent Requirements• Work with Regional Councils

• BioGro Certification NZ – NZBPCC

• Standards

The Future: Microsheds/Transition Towns

Questions + Contact Details

Neville Burt – [email protected] Barnes – [email protected]

The Juice (Liquid Product)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Time (days)

Cu

mu

lati

ve J

uic

e V

olu

me

(mL

)

Ferm 1 Ferm 2