boulan park middle school€¦ · the troy school district continues to implement a comprehensive...

An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

Barbara A. Fowler, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools

Boulan Park

Middle School

Dear Parents, Students, and Community Members of Boulan Park Middle School,

We are pleased to present you with the Annual Education Report (AER), required by the Elementary

and Secondary Reporting Act of 2001, which provides key information about the 2011-2012 educational

progress for Boulan Park Middle School. The AER addresses the complex reporting information

required by federal and state laws. This report contains information about student assessment, Adequate

Yearly Progress (AYP) and teacher quality, as well as PA 25 state law reporting requirements. If you

have any questions about the AER or PA 25 information, please contact Mrs. Jo Kwasny for assistance.

The entire Annual Educational Report is attached to this cover letter and is also available for you to

review electronically by visiting the following website at: http://boulan.troy.k12.mi.us/ or you may view

a copy from our main office.

Our Mission

The Boulan Park Middle School community will provide an environment where all

students learn today for success tomorrow.

Our Vision

Boulan Park Middle School will be an exemplary learning community supporting creativity, personal

responsibility, and innovation. Boulan Park will be a place where a caring and collaborative

community, committed to continuous improvement, shares and develops a globally competitive

curriculum, and uses cutting-edge instructional strategies and meaningful assessment to ensure

accountability and learning for all students.

http://boulan.troy.k12.mi.us/


Goals

Literacy: 70% of students in grades 6, 7 and 8 will master the informational text unit common

assessment with a 70% or higher proficiency rate after completing the unit with instruction and

practice.

Math: 75% of Algebraic Thinking students will show a 50% (or higher) improvement rate on the

District Common Assessment (DCA) from pre- to post-test. 75% of all honors and regular-

tracked students will score 80% or higher on the DCA.

Science: It is the goal of the Science Department to increase physical science student

proficiency in data representation and research summaries to 75% on the ACT Explore test in

grade 8.

Social Studies: It is the goal of the Science Department to increase physical science student

proficiency in data representation and research summaries to 75% on the ACT Explore test in

grade 8.

Annual Education Report (AER)

For 2011-2012, Boulan Park Middle School made Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in English language

arts and mathematics. While we are pleased to have reached this important goal, we are continuously

working to improve. We appreciate the continued support of parents, staff and our community in this

effort.

The full report can be found attached to this cover letter or at the following link:


Process of assigning students to each school

Students are assigned to schools by grade level according to the district attendance boundaries. Students

residing in the district may request open enrollment in a school other than the one to which they are

assigned during the open enrollment period. Open enrollment is approved on the basis of staffing and

capacity in the building. High School students needing an alternative setting to the traditional classroom

environment are identified and assigned to Niles High School through the District’s intervention model

for struggling high school students.

Core Curriculum Implementation

The Troy School District continues to implement a comprehensive curriculum for all students. The

curriculum is based on, and aligns with, the state’s Michigan Merit Curriculum, High School Content

Expectations, Grade Level Content Expectations, and the Common Core State Standards.



Parent Involvement

The Board of Education recognizes that a student’s education is a responsibility shared by the school

and family during the entire period the student attends school. Over the years, research has proven that

there is a direct relationship between parent involvement and student achievement. To support the goal

of the school district to help all students succeed, schools and parents must work together as active

partners.

Percent of Parent Participation in Parent-Teacher Conferences

School Year Winter Spring

2010 – 2011 87% 60%

2009 – 2010 86% 56%

Locally administered assessments

Our locally administered assessments are part of a balanced assessment system that uses the results from

both summative and formative assessments to monitor learning and to adjust instruction. Our teachers

develop their own range of formative and summative assessments to monitor, grade, and make

inferences about a student’s ability to meet standards and curriculum goals. Teachers use data they

collect from students to plan instruction and to direct re-teaching.

Student Achievement

More than 95 percent of Troy School District graduates go on to higher education and are accepted at

the finest schools in the U.S.A. Students earn millions of dollars in college scholarships annually.

Recruiters have also reported that the Troy School District is one of the top feeder districts to the

University of Michigan and Michigan State University.

Our high school graduates achieve top scores in every major assessment area, including the Michigan

Education Assessment Program (MEAP), SAT and ACT. For more information, please see the complete

AER report.

Points of Pride

Michigan Blue Ribbon School

North Central Accreditation

ACT Explore Perfect Score

- Sixteen 8th

graders

All State Band

- Two students qualified and participated

American Math Competition 8 (AMC8)

- Student achieved perfect score

Green Schools - Evergreen Status

International Purple Comet Math Contest

- 1st Place

Lego Robotics


- Qualified for Robofest International Championship

MathCounts

- 1st in state, 9

th nationally

Michigan China Quiz Bowl – two teams

- 1st Place

- 2nd

Place

Michigan Math League (MML)

- 1st Place: 8

th grade

Michigan School Band & Orchestra Association State Festival

- Straight 1st Division Ratings: Advanced Orchestra

Midwest Talent Search

- 129 students qualified, 5 received national recognition for scores

National Language Arts League

- 1st nationally: 6

th grade

President’s Award for Educational Achievement

- Awarded to 157 8th

grade students

Presidential Physical Fitness Award

- Awarded to fourteen 6th

graders, thirty-seven 7th

graders

Quiz Bowl

- 1st in state: 6

th, 7

th, 8

th grades

Stock Market Game

- Student placed 1st in state

Student APT to Succeed documentary presented to NCA

Student financial or material donations to Covenant House, Michigan Humane Society,

- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Troy People Concerned, UNICEF,

- UNICEF Fund for Syria, World Wildlife Fund

Troy School District

Executive Staff

Superintendent – Barbara A. Fowler, Ph.D.

Assistant Superintendent of Secondary Instruction – Richard M. Machesky, Ed.D.

Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Instruction – Jan Keeling

Troy School District

Board of Education

2011 - 2012

Nancy Philippart, President

Ida Edmunds, Vice President

Todd Miletti, Secretary

Paula Fleming, Trustee

Wendy Underwood, Trustee

Gary Hauff, Trustee

Karl Schmidt, Trustee

Annual Education Report 09/19/2012

School-Level Combined Reports Data for Oakland Schools, Troy School District, Boulan Park Middle School

Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP)

Subject Grade Student Group School Year % StudentsTested

State %StudentsProficient

District %StudentsProficient

School %StudentsProficient

% Advanced(Level 1)

% Proficient(Level 2)

% PartiallyProficient(Level 3)

% NotProficient(Level 4)

EnglishLanguage Arts /Reading

06 All Students 2010-11 98.5% 63.2% 78.4% 85.6% 39.6% 46% 7.4% 6.9%


06 All Students 2011-12 100% 67% 84.2% 88.3% 43.1% 45.2% 5.9% 5.9%


06 Asian 2010-11 98.7% 75.5% 87.2% 87.8% 47.3% 40.5% 9.5% 2.7%


06 Asian 2011-12 100% 77.4% 88.9% 90.7% 47.7% 43% 6.5% 2.8%


06 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 100% 39.2% 60.4% 75% 16.7% 58.3% 0% 25%



2011-12 <10 43.8% 49.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Hispanic orLatino

2010-11 <10 47.7% 70% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 52.6% 95.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 61.3% 86.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 65.3% 75% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 White 2010-11 98.2% 70.7% 76.1% 84.5% 35.5% 49.1% 7.3% 8.2%


06 White 2011-12 100% 74.1% 85.9% 88% 40.2% 47.9% 6% 6%


06 Female 2010-11 98.9% 66.8% 79.2% 86.2% 46% 40.2% 4.6% 9.2%


06 Female 2011-12 100% 70.2% 88.4% 90.6% 46.2% 44.3% 5.7% 3.8%

Page 1 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)





06 Male 2010-11 98.3% 59.7% 77.7% 85.2% 34.8% 50.4% 9.6% 5.2%


06 Male 2011-12 100% 63.8% 80.2% 86.5% 40.6% 45.9% 6% 7.5%


06 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 89.5% 48.9% 47% 64.7% 23.5% 41.2% 17.6% 17.6%



2011-12 100% 53.6% 60.7% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3% 0% 33.3%


06 Limited EnglishProficient

2010-11 <10 20.8% 25.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 100% 29.3% 63.6% 72% 20% 52% 8% 20%


06 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 100% 23.3% 29.2% 40% 10% 30% 20% 40%



2011-12 100% 28.9% 47.1% 50% 5% 45% 20% 30%


07 All Students 2010-11 99.2% 55.6% 79.6% 85.5% 36.5% 49% 10.4% 4.1%


07 All Students 2011-12 100% 59.7% 82.2% 89.4% 49% 40.4% 7.2% 3.4%


07 Asian 2010-11 97.9% 73.6% 90.1% 89.1% 51.1% 38% 7.6% 3.3%


07 Asian 2011-12 100% 75.9% 93.3% 93.8% 65% 28.7% 5% 1.3%



2010-11 <10 30.2% 46% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 100% 34.7% 64.9% 81.8% 27.3% 54.5% 18.2% 0%

Page 2 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)






2010-11 <10 42.8% 61.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 46% 70% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 Native Hawaiianor Other PacificIslander

2010-11 <10 52.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 55% 67.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 58.7% 85.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 White 2010-11 100% 62.8% 79.3% 84.7% 27.7% 56.9% 11.7% 3.6%


07 White 2011-12 100% 66.9% 79.2% 87.4% 38.7% 48.6% 8.1% 4.5%


07 Female 2010-11 98.4% 60.3% 83% 90.6% 40.9% 49.6% 7.9% 1.6%


07 Female 2011-12 100% 63.9% 85.6% 92.7% 60.4% 32.3% 3.1% 4.2%


07 Male 2010-11 100% 51.1% 76.4% 79.8% 31.6% 48.2% 13.2% 7%


07 Male 2011-12 100% 55.6% 79% 86.6% 39.3% 47.3% 10.7% 2.7%



2010-11 100% 40.1% 54.3% 58.8% 5.9% 52.9% 35.3% 5.9%



2011-12 100% 44.5% 53.3% 78.9% 31.6% 47.4% 15.8% 5.3%



2010-11 94.1% 17.8% 35.1% 37.5% 0% 37.5% 43.8% 18.8%

Page 3 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)






2011-12 100% 21.3% 33.8% 50% 8.3% 41.7% 25% 25%



2010-11 100% 14.9% 34.8% 40% 0% 40% 25% 35%



2011-12 <10 19% 33.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 All Students 2010-11 97.9% 56% 79.9% 90.8% 33.6% 57.2% 7.9% 1.3%


08 All Students 2011-12 100% 60.5% 80.4% 88.8% 32.9% 55.8% 8.8% 2.4%


08 Asian 2010-11 96.6% 72.4% 92.1% 94% 51.2% 42.9% 6% 0%


08 Asian 2011-12 100% 76% 92.2% 96% 48% 48% 4% 0%



2010-11 <10 35% 64.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 39.4% 56.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 41.6% 56.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 48% 72.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 57.4% 69.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 59.8% 74.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 White 2010-11 99.2% 61.9% 77.3% 89.1% 24% 65.1% 9.3% 1.6%

Page 4 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)





08 White 2011-12 100% 66.5% 78% 86.8% 23.5% 63.2% 11% 2.2%


08 Female 2010-11 98.2% 60.9% 82.9% 91.7% 37% 54.6% 7.4% 0.9%


08 Female 2011-12 100% 65.3% 83.3% 94.5% 38.3% 56.3% 4.7% 0.8%


08 Male 2010-11 97.6% 51.2% 77.3% 90.1% 30.6% 59.5% 8.3% 1.7%


08 Male 2011-12 100% 55.9% 77.6% 82.6% 27.3% 55.4% 13.2% 4.1%



2010-11 92.9% 41.4% 58.3% 92.3% 15.4% 76.9% 0% 7.7%



2011-12 100% 46.7% 58.3% 69.2% 0% 69.2% 23.1% 7.7%



2010-11 <10 19% 35.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 100% 24.8% 34.4% 55.6% 16.7% 38.9% 44.4% 0%



2010-11 100% 16.5% 30.4% 52.9% 5.9% 47.1% 41.2% 5.9%



2011-12 100% 20.3% 37.3% 47.4% 0% 47.4% 42.1% 10.5%

Mathematics 06 All Students 2010-11 99.5% 36.2% 65.8% 78.9% 23.5% 55.4% 9.3% 11.8%

Mathematics 06 All Students 2011-12 100% 37.1% 69% 79.9% 20.1% 59.8% 9.6% 10.5%

Mathematics 06 Asian 2010-11 98.7% 68.1% 88.4% 89.2% 48.6% 40.5% 5.4% 5.4%

Mathematics 06 Asian 2011-12 100% 68.6% 90.2% 94.4% 33.3% 61.1% 2.8% 2.8%

Mathematics 06 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 100% 15.5% 34% 58.3% 0% 58.3% 16.7% 25%


2011-12 <10 15.4% 26.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 5 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)




Mathematics 06 Hispanic orLatino

2010-11 <10 22.9% 40% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 22.8% 50% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 31.7% 63.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 33.1% 68.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 White 2010-11 100% 41.9% 60% 75.9% 9.8% 66.1% 9.8% 14.3%

Mathematics 06 White 2011-12 100% 43% 64.5% 70.7% 9.5% 61.2% 14.7% 14.7%

Mathematics 06 Female 2010-11 100% 36.1% 65% 80.7% 19.3% 61.4% 9.1% 10.2%

Mathematics 06 Female 2011-12 100% 36.8% 68.9% 78.5% 15.9% 62.6% 10.3% 11.2%

Mathematics 06 Male 2010-11 99.1% 36.3% 66.6% 77.6% 26.7% 50.9% 9.5% 12.9%

Mathematics 06 Male 2011-12 100% 37.4% 69.2% 81.1% 23.5% 57.6% 9.1% 9.8%

Mathematics 06 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 100% 22% 33.9% 57.9% 5.3% 52.6% 10.5% 31.6%


2011-12 100% 22.5% 38.8% 41.7% 8.3% 33.3% 33.3% 25%

Mathematics 06 Limited EnglishProficient

2010-11 <10 14.2% 39.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 100% 16.1% 57% 81.5% 7.4% 74.1% 7.4% 11.1%

Mathematics 06 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 100% 10% 23.9% 30% 0% 30% 10% 60%


2011-12 100% 11% 21.1% 30% 0% 30% 15% 55%

Mathematics 07 All Students 2010-11 100% 35.9% 70.5% 78.6% 23.5% 55.1% 13.2% 8.2%

Mathematics 07 All Students 2011-12 100% 37.2% 71.5% 80.1% 27% 53.1% 13.3% 6.6%

Mathematics 07 Asian 2010-11 100% 67.6% 91.4% 93.6% 45.7% 47.9% 4.3% 2.1%

Mathematics 07 Asian 2011-12 100% 68.9% 91% 93.9% 61% 32.9% 4.9% 1.2%


2010-11 <10 13.2% 30.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 100% 13.4% 36.2% 45.5% 0% 45.5% 36.4% 18.2%


2010-11 <10 22.5% 44.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 23.2% 59.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 6 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)




Mathematics 07 Native Hawaiianor Other PacificIslander

2010-11 <10 31.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2010-11 <10 32.2% 60% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 34.5% 75% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 07 White 2010-11 100% 42% 66.7% 72.3% 9.5% 62.8% 19% 8.8%

Mathematics 07 White 2011-12 100% 43.6% 66.5% 73% 4.5% 68.5% 18% 9%

Mathematics 07 Female 2010-11 100% 36% 72% 82.9% 24.8% 58.1% 11.6% 5.4%

Mathematics 07 Female 2011-12 100% 38% 72.9% 79.2% 22.9% 56.3% 16.7% 4.2%




2010-11 100% 20.8% 37.7% 29.4% 0% 29.4% 47.1% 23.5%


2011-12 100% 21.6% 36.9% 52.6% 5.3% 47.4% 26.3% 21.1%


2010-11 100% 15.3% 36.7% 58.8% 5.9% 52.9% 17.6% 23.5%


2011-12 100% 15.5% 44% 60% 6.7% 53.3% 20% 20%


2010-11 100% 7.6% 22.6% 40% 0% 40% 25% 35%


2011-12 <10 8.6% 24.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 All Students 2010-11 100% 28.9% 65.8% 73.1% 35% 38% 19.2% 7.7%

Mathematics 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 29.4% 66.2% 77.5% 32.9% 44.6% 13.7% 8.8%

Mathematics 08 Asian 2010-11 100% 61.9% 90.6% 92% 64.4% 27.6% 5.7% 2.3%

Mathematics 08 Asian 2011-12 100% 61.9% 89.9% 96% 60% 36% 3% 1%


2010-11 <10 9.1% 25.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 9.1% 35.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2010-11 <10 16% 22.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 16.3% 44.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2010-11 <10 25.8% 53.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 7 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)





2011-12 <10 26.4% 59.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 White 2010-11 100% 33.9% 60.3% 63.8% 16.9% 46.9% 26.9% 9.2%

Mathematics 08 White 2011-12 100% 34.6% 59.8% 68.4% 16.2% 52.2% 21.3% 10.3%

Mathematics 08 Female 2010-11 100% 27.4% 61.2% 71.8% 30.9% 40.9% 18.2% 10%

Mathematics 08 Female 2011-12 100% 28% 66.2% 82% 30.5% 51.6% 13.3% 4.7%


Mathematics 08 Male 2011-12 100% 30.7% 66.2% 72.7% 35.5% 37.2% 14% 13.2%


2010-11 100% 14.6% 33.1% 50% 14.3% 35.7% 50% 0%


2011-12 100% 15.3% 33.3% 30.8% 7.7% 23.1% 53.8% 15.4%


2010-11 <10 9.4% 27.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 100% 10.9% 31.9% 72.2% 33.3% 38.9% 11.1% 16.7%


2010-11 100% 5% 12.7% 11.8% 0% 11.8% 47.1% 41.2%


2011-12 100% 5.7% 23.7% 36.8% 5.3% 31.6% 31.6% 31.6%

Science 08 All Students 2010-11 100% 14.9% 34.2% 48.7% 23.1% 25.6% 30.3% 20.9%

Science 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 16.5% 34.7% 45.8% 18.1% 27.7% 34.1% 20.1%

Science 08 Asian 2010-11 100% 30.7% 52.5% 67.8% 37.9% 29.9% 23% 9.2%

Science 08 Asian 2011-12 100% 33.9% 56.4% 62% 28% 34% 31% 7%

Science 08 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 <10 3.2% 6.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Black or AfricanAmerican

2011-12 <10 3.3% 18.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Hispanic orLatino

2010-11 <10 6.9% 16.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Hispanic orLatino

2011-12 <10 7.5% 27.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 13.9% 30.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 14.7% 17.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 White 2010-11 100% 18.1% 29.2% 39.2% 14.6% 24.6% 35.4% 25.4%

Science 08 White 2011-12 100% 20.1% 28.1% 36% 12.5% 23.5% 38.2% 25.7%Page 8 of 29








% Advanced(Level 1)




Science 08 Female 2010-11 100% 12% 29.1% 40% 20.9% 19.1% 35.5% 24.5%

Science 08 Female 2011-12 100% 13.8% 32.1% 44.5% 16.4% 28.1% 34.4% 21.1%

Science 08 Male 2010-11 100% 17.7% 38.6% 56.5% 25% 31.5% 25.8% 17.7%

Science 08 Male 2011-12 100% 19% 37.2% 47.1% 19.8% 27.3% 33.9% 19%

Science 08 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 100% 6.9% 11.4% 28.6% 7.1% 21.4% 35.7% 35.7%

Science 08 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2011-12 100% 7.7% 13% 7.7% 0% 7.7% 61.5% 30.8%

Science 08 Limited EnglishProficient

2010-11 <10 1.5% 0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Limited EnglishProficient

2011-12 100% 2.9% 11.6% 38.9% 11.1% 27.8% 27.8% 33.3%

Science 08 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 100% 3.3% 5.3% 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 29.4% 58.8%

Science 08 Students withDisabilities

2011-12 100% 3.5% 8.9% 5.3% 0% 5.3% 47.4% 47.4%

Page 9 of 29



Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME)





% Advanced(Level 1)




Page 10 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Functional Independence


State % StudentsProficient



% Surpassed(Level 1)

% Attained(Level 2)

% Emerging(Level 3)

Mathematics 06 All Students 2011-12 <10 74.2% 63.6% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 White 2011-12 <10 76.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 Male 2011-12 <10 75.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 All Students 2011-12 <10 78.9% 92.3% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 Asian 2011-12 <10 81% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 Female 2011-12 <10 77.5% 90% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 All Students 2011-12 <10 50.7% 30.8% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Asian 2011-12 <10 38.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Female 2011-12 <10 46.7% 40% <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 11 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Supported Independence






% Attained(Level 2)

% Emerging(Level 3)

English LanguageArts

07 All Students 2011-12 <10 80% <10 N/A N/A N/A N/A


07 White 2011-12 <10 78.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A


07 Male 2011-12 <10 76.4% <10 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Mathematics 07 All Students 2011-12 <10 88.4% <10 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Mathematics 07 White 2011-12 <10 90.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Mathematics 07 Male 2011-12 <10 88.3% <10 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Page 12 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Participation






% Attained(Level 2)

% Emerging(Level 3)


06 All Students 2011-12 <10 60.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Asian 2011-12 <10 60% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Male 2011-12 <10 59.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 All Students 2011-12 <10 52.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


Mathematics 06 Male 2011-12 <10 51.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 13 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MEAP-Access





% Level 1 % Level 2 % Level 3

Reading 06 All Students 2011-12 100% 59% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Reading 06 Asian 2011-12 <10 59.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 06 White 2011-12 <10 64.9% 71.4% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 06 Female 2011-12 <10 65.3% 66.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 06 Male 2011-12 <10 58.6% 66.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 60.7% 57.1% 100% 0% 100% 0%

Reading 08 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 63% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 08 Female 2011-12 <10 63.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 08 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2011-12 <10 60.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 All Students 2011-12 100% 59.6% 76.9% 100% 0% 100% 0%


Mathematics 06 White 2011-12 <10 65.7% 100% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 Female 2011-12 <10 58.5% 100% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 Male 2011-12 <10 63.1% 71.4% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 43% 40% 100% 0% 100% 0%


2011-12 <10 52.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 Female 2011-12 <10 45.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 42.3% 33.3% <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 14 of 29



AYP Detail Data

Student Group Location Subject % Tested (Goal 95%) % Proficient for AYP*

All Students State English Language Arts /Reading

98.8% 82.9%

All Students State Mathematics 98.5% 57.5%

All Students District English Language Arts /Reading

100.2% 94%

All Students District Mathematics 99.5% 85.3%

All Students School English Language Arts /Reading

100.1% 96.7%

All Students School Mathematics 99.7% 90.2%

American Indian or AlaskaNative

State English Language Arts /Reading

97.7% 78.6%


State Mathematics 97.5% 47.4%


District English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30


District Mathematics <30 <30

Asian, Native Hawaiian, orPacific Islander


100.6% 89.8%





100.9% 97.8%


District Mathematics 99.6% 96.6%


School English Language Arts /Reading

100.3% 98.8%


School Mathematics 100% 97.5%

Black or African American State English Language Arts /Reading

96.9% 67.4%

Black or African American State Mathematics 96.4% 32.2%

Black or African American District English Language Arts /Reading

98.7% 82%

Black or African American District Mathematics 98.7% 58.2%

Black or African American School English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30

Black or African American School Mathematics <30 <30

Hispanic or Latino State English Language Arts /Reading

99% 75.8%

Hispanic or Latino State Mathematics 98.5% 44.6%

Hispanic or Latino District English Language Arts /Reading

104.2% 91.2%

Hispanic or Latino District Mathematics 98.8% 77.4%

Hispanic or Latino School English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30

Hispanic or Latino School Mathematics <30 <30

Two or More Races State English Language Arts /Reading

99.1% 83.6%

Two or More Races State Mathematics 99% 54.9%

Two or More Races District English Language Arts /Reading

98.6% 92.1%

Two or More Races District Mathematics 98.6% 82.6%

Two or More Races School English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30

Two or More Races School Mathematics <30 <30

White State English Language Arts /Reading

99.2% 86.9%

White State Mathematics 99% 63.9%

White District English Language Arts /Reading

100% 93.6%

White District Mathematics 99.5% 83.2%

White School English Language Arts /Reading

99.7% 95.8%

Page 15 of 29



AYP Detail Data

Student Group Location Subject % Tested (Goal 95%) % Proficient for AYP*

White School Mathematics 99.5% 88.3%

EconomicallyDisadvantaged


98.3% 74.4%





99.9% 83.4%


District Mathematics 98.7% 63.8%


School English Language Arts /Reading

100% 91.4%


School Mathematics 100% 77.1%

Students with Disabilities State English Language Arts /Reading

97.7% 51.5%

Students with Disabilities State Mathematics 97.3% 32%

Students with Disabilities District English Language Arts /Reading

99.2% 73%

Students with Disabilities District Mathematics 98.9% 55.9%

Students with Disabilities School English Language Arts /Reading

98.2% 83.3%

Students with Disabilities School Mathematics 98.2% 56.7%Note: 1037 Recently arrived LEP students took part in the State’s ELPA instead of the MEAP/MME/MI-Access.

Page 16 of 29



AYP Detail Data - Graduation Rate

Student Group Location Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal80%)

All Students State 79.2%

All Students District 94.23%

American Indian or Alaska Native State 68.49%

American Indian or Alaska Native District <10

Asian State 90.49%

Asian District >95%

Black or African American State 62.56%

Black or African American District 78.13%

Hispanic or Latino State 68.31%

Hispanic or Latino District 85%

Migrant State 73.33%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander State 71.79%

Two or More Races State 73.44%

Two or More Races District 95%

White State 84.81%

White District 94.44%

Female State 83.17%

Female District >95%

Male State 75.45%

Male District 93.3%

Economically Disadvantaged State 67.16%

Economically Disadvantaged District 70.83%

Students with Disabilities State 64.79%

Students with Disabilities District 79.31%

* All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year.

Page 17 of 29



AYP Detail Data - Attendance Rate

Student Group Location Attendance Rate (Goal 90%)

All Students State 94.8%

All Students District 97%

All Students School 97.1%

American Indian or Alaska Native State 94.1%

American Indian or Alaska Native District 97.2%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 96.4%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander District 97.5%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander School 98%

Black or African American State 91%

Black or African American District 96.6%

Black or African American School 96%

Hispanic or Latino State 94.3%

Hispanic or Latino District 96.5%

Hispanic or Latino School 95.1%

Two or More Races State 95%

Two or More Races District 96.8%

Two or More Races School 97%

White State 95.8%

White District 96.9%

White School 96.7%

Economically Disadvantaged State 94.8%

Economically Disadvantaged District 97%

Economically Disadvantaged School 97.1%

Students with Disabilities State 93.2%

Students with Disabilities District 96%

Students with Disabilities School 97.1%

* All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year.

Page 18 of 29



Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Reading/ELA

School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

2001-02 38% 31% 42%

2002-03 38% 31% 42%

2003-04 38% 31% 42%

2004-05 48% 43% 52%

2005-06 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2006-07 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2007-08 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2008-09 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2009-10 70% 69% 68% 67% 66% 65% 71%

2010-11 78% 77% 76% 75% 74% 73% 79%

2011-12 86% 85% 84% 83% 82% 82% 86%

2012-13 93% 92% 92% 91% 91% 91% 93%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Page 19 of 29



Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Mathematics

School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

2001-02 47% 31% 33%

2002-03 47% 31% 33%

2003-04 47% 31% 33%

2004-05 56% 43% 44%

2005-06 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2006-07 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2007-08 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2008-09 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2009-10 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2010-11 75% 74% 71% 70% 67% 66% 67%

2011-12 83% 82% 81% 80% 78% 77% 78%

2012-13 91% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% 89%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Page 20 of 29



School AYP Status

Title 1 Status AYP ELA/ReadingStatus

AYP MathematicsStatus

AYP Overall Status Education Yes ReportCard Grade

School StatusIndicator

No Met Met Met A Focus

Page 21 of 29



Teacher Quality Data

Other B.A. M.A. Ph.D

Professional Qualificationsof All Public Elementary andSecondary School Teachersin the School

0 11 35 1

Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers

Page 22 of 29




Certification Percent

Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in theSchool with Emergency Certification

0%

Page 23 of 29




School Aggregate

Percentage of Core Academic Subject Elementary and SecondarySchool Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers

0%

Page 24 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Mathematics Results

Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced

All Students 100 22 43 30 5

MaleFemale

5050

2122

4245

3129

64

National LunchProgram EligilityEligibleNot EligibleInfo not available

4356

3511

4741

1741

18

Race EthnicityWhiteBlackHispanicAsianAmerican IndianNativeHawaiian/PacificIslanderTwo or More Races

711663

2

1453317‡‡23

45394822‡‡50

3681945‡‡21

50226‡‡6

Student classified ashaving a disabilitySDNot SD

1387

5018

3744

1332

15

Student is an EnglishLanguage LearnerELLNot ELL

496

4721

4144

1131

15

‡ Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011Mathematics Achievement.

Page 25 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Mathematics Results



MaleFemale

5149

2830

3941

2624

75


4258

4518

3941

1532

29


7416431

2

22662613‡‡‡

43264125‡‡‡

2971831‡‡‡

60532‡‡‡


1288

7025

2341

527

16


298

5729

2740

725

106

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011Mathematics Achievement.

Page 26 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Reading Results



MaleFemale

5050

3831

3336

2426

67


4555 51

21

3236

1533

210


7017630

2

26675119‡‡36

37242933‡‡31

3071733‡‡19

71315‡‡14


1387

7330

1736

827

27


397

6733

2635

725

07

# Rounds to zero

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment.

Page 27 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Reading Results



MaleFemale

5050

2818

4743

2435

24


4258

3514

4644

1837

04


7416431

1

18462519‡‡‡

46435027‡‡‡

33102539‡‡‡

30114‡‡‡


1288

6719

2746

631

03


298

5222

4045

830

03

# Rounds to zero

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment.

Page 28 of 29



Grade Subject Participation Rate forStudents withDisabilities

Standard Error Participation Rate forLimited EnglishProficient Students

Standard Error

4 MathReading

8575

2.03.1

7393

3.32.4

8 MathReading

7363

2.53.3

8379

4.74.5

Page 29 of 29

boulan park middle school€¦ · the troy school district continues to implement a comprehensive...

Documents