A friend dropping in

britain’s biggest regional news title tUesDaY, 16 FebrUarY, 2016

only 52p including free delivery to subscribers see page 2 70pMAin edition

Disney cool on show

Dogs home to reopenMANCHESTER: Manchester Dogs Home is set to re-open almost 18 months after a devastating fire.

» Page 6

ROCHDALE: Disney lawyers have halted an adaptation of ‘Frozen.’

» Page 7

6 held on theft claimW/SHAWE: Six people have been arrested over claims money from hospital car parking ma-chines has been stolen.

» Page 2

NURSEDIESLEAVING PAL’S WEDDING‘I was going to ask her to marry me,’ says boyfriend after Aussie car horror. ‘Now one side of my bed is empty’ Page 6

●● Darcy-Jaine Hopwood, was from Greater Manchester

●We house one-in-four of all those seeking refuge in England●With no financial help from London, can our over-stretched services cope?

Asylum seekers:

Read Jennifer Williams’ special report on Pages 3,4 & 5

M.E.N. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2016 3Follow us on Twitter @MENnewsdesk

CAN WE COPE WITH sO mANy AsyLUm sEEKERs?

Continued Page 4

What do the residents, politicians and the asylum seekers themselves think?

Pages 4 & 5

£10� month

Phone �nd t�riff

Hello, free t�blet.

£10� month

Phone �nd t�riff

General: Prices shown for eBill. For paper bill add £1.50. 24-month contract. Credit check and payment by Direct Debit required. Early disconnection fees apply. The charge for your tariff will increase with your July bill each year. Any increase will be in line with the Retail Price Index (RPI) rate of infl ation at the time and we’ll always give you 30 days’ notice of the exact increase each year. Freestyle Legal Stuff: You must pay off your loan in full in order to upgrade your handset. 0% APR Representative. Based on a 24-month consumer credit agreement with Virgin Media Mobile Finance Limited for the phone and a 30-day rolling Pay Monthly Airtime Contract with Virgin Mobile Telecoms Limited. Credit subject to status, credit check and payment by Direct Debit. 18+. Terms and conditions apply. Visit virginmedia.com/freestyle for full details. Virgin Media Mobile Finance Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under register no. 626215. Registered offi ce: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UP. Registered in England and Wales no. 9058868. Android™ tablet offer: Free Alcatel Pixi 3 7-inch WiFi Android™ tablet (the ‘tablet’) available when purchasing an LG Spirit from Virgin Media on a Freestyle Pay Monthly tariff. Offer available while stocks of the tablet last. If the handset and tariff order is cancelled or exchanged within 14 days, the tablet must be returned with the handset in an unused condition along with its original packaging and all accessories. If the tablet is damaged on return or you fail to return all the parts and accessories, we reserve the right to charge you for the full recommended retail price of the tablet (£59.99) or for any repair cost. There is no cash, credit or other alternative to the tablet. Non transferable. Further Legal Stuff applies. See virginmedia.com for details.

Duration of credit agreement:

24 months

Upfront fee:£0

Monthly device/s payment:

£5

Total creditamount:

£120

Device/s cash price:

£120

Monthly tariff cost:

£5

RepresentativeAPR:0%

Representative cost for LG Spirit and tariff

Android™ t�bletLG Spirit

virginmedi�.com | 0800 073 1295 I Virgin Medi� store

Hurry! They won’t be �round for long.

Now with the LG Spirit �nd t�rifffor just £10 � month.

Greater manchester houses one-in-four of all those seeking refuge in England - but David Cameron and Theresa may’s

councils have the grand total of ONE. There’s no extra cash for local services and the cracks are now appearing . . .

It’s an uncomforta-ble question. some fear raising it – or

voicing the strength of their answer too publicly – for fear of being branded a rac-ist.

Parts of the left would deny it even needs discussing at all.

But it does have to be asked: Can the region cope with the sheer number of asylum seekers being placed in its poorest areas?

Increasingly, residents and local politicians say No. One-in-four of England’s asylum seekers are now in Greater Manchester, mostly in areas still clawing their way out of recession. It is a startling figure. Home Office statistics from November show the region now has more asylum seekers than Wales and scotland put together. At around 1,000, Rochdale has more than the whole of the south east of England. Bolton isn’t far behind.

Or to put it another way, Greater Manchester is accommodating 5,510 asylum seekers while David Cameron and

Home secretary’s theresa May’s local councils – between them – only have ONE.

the reason for this dates back to tony Blair. Fifteen years ago, a flurry of publicity about the rent being spent housing asylum seekers in the south east and London led to a new approach.

It was a simple one: they were shipped out to the places that have the cheapest housing. And that has carried on ever since.

More than a decade on, those communities are now feeling the strain. the areas with the cheapest housing – the Rochdales, the Oldhams – are inevitably often those already lagging behind in terms of jobs, skills, income, investment and quality of life.

they also already have the greatest reliance on public services and have seen the biggest council cuts in the country.

But because asylum seekers do not bring with them any extra government funding, those services – schools, councils and health services, particularly – are put under extra pressure without any additional funds. And that’s before you get into the thorny issue of

community cohesion.the Home Office’s

contractor serco used to be paid government cash not only for asylum seekers’ rent, but to support them. that second part has since been scrapped, leaving councils to pick up the bill for a lot of problems.

Rochdale’s Labour council leader is blunt. People are just being ‘dumped’ there.

“Most of them are single men,” says Coun Richard Farnell. “Where they come with children we have to look after them and get no money from the government whatsoever. And obviously, then they put a strain on the health service and so on.

“Quite often, they are placed in the poorest areas where the housing is cheapest, so you get an over-concentration in one area.

“that causes tremendous community tension.

“We also have to deal with lots of low level anti-social behaviour problems. they are poorly supported by the Home Office’s contractor, serco, and are not allowed to work so have got no money and are hanging around

causing problems in the local community.”

But his biggest beef – like many of the frustrated local politicians you speak to in areas like his – is the unfairness.

“It’s grossly unfair that places like Rochdale, where we have enough problems of our own, are having all these asylum seekers dumped in the borough.” the housing asylum seekers are put in often could have been knocked down otherwise, says Jim McMahon, formerly Oldham council leader but now Labour MP for Oldham West and Royton.

“It’s that heavy concentration on a couple of streets in a very, very small neighbourhood,” he says. “Because it’s cheap housing, you also get economic migrants as well. But some of these places just need to be demolished.

“If you don’t talk about it, it leaves room for people to talk about it for other reasons.”

He is clearly conscious of the shadow Ukip, and parties further to the right, now cast over Labour politicians in this neck of the woods. there are signs Labour

Jennifer WilliamsJennifer.Williams@trinitymirror.com@JenWilliamsMEN

4 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2016 M.E.N.Find us on Facebook at facebook.com/ManchesterEveningNews

●● M.E.N. SPECIAL REPORT: As services in parts of Greater Manchester buckle under an influx of asylum seekers, residents hit out – insisting they are being realistic NOT racist. JENNIFER WILLIAMS examines the issues

‘THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T WANT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS IN THEIR IVORY TOWER’J

oyce Todd, Tammy Lowe and Nick Watson all live on Villa Road in

Hathershaw, oldham.Their road of red-brick

terraces has seen a churn of different nationalities over recent years, which they insist has not been a problem in and of itself.

Joyce bought her house in 1979 and says she has lived next to Indians, Pakistanis, Poles and czechs. She made friends with them, she says.

A few years ago, there was an asylum-seeking

household of Somalis and they caused no problems, either.

Their issue now, they say, is a sudden influx of Roma people – economic migrants, rather than asylum seekers – on to their road and the culture clash that has brought.

yet they are also aware of the high numbers of asylum seekers being placed in oldham.

“People are aware of it,” says Joyce, 56. “Why are they all in our area? Why? The government don’t want them in their ivory tower, do they?”

Is she worried about sounding racist? No. “I’m only saying what other people are thinking.”

Tammy lives over the road in a council house with her three children, a teenage daughter and two small twins. When the twins were born, she asked for a house with an extra bedroom, she says.

“They just partitioned one of the bedrooms

instead because they’ve got no houses,” she says. They seem baffled that oldham is chosen because it supposedly has plentiful cheap housing, when residents are unable to access housing themselves.

Nick, 45, has a number of health problems and

walks with a stick. He used to work, but has just had to wait three months to get his disability allowance through after his health got too bad.

He notes the government has just committed another £1.2bn in aid for Syrian refugees.

“Where’s the money for people who live here?” he asks.

ThE two issues – asylum and EU workers – are inextricably linked for many people, particularly in areas that are affected by both, but have less in the way of public services.

But while David Cameron’s cure for Europe is still being worked out ahead of a referendum, the sickness in the asylum system seems easier to diagnose.

Nevertheless, when you ask the home Office about its asylum policy – officially

called ‘dispersal’ – they provide their usual answer: it has been in place since 2000.

All local authorities have to agree to housing asylum seekers before they are placed there, it says. (Councils claim this is simply not true – that they often have no idea who is being placed, or where.)

In Rochdale’s case, Richard Farnell told the government that enough was enough and said the borough could not accept

MahMoud afara fled from Syria to Lebanon. he was persecuted in both countries. he is now living in Fallowfield while is asylum claim is processed.

Like all asylum seekers he is given a £5 daily handout in order to buy food. Speaking to the M.E.N. earlier this month, he told how he was confused by the

thought of many British people that asylum seekers are costing the country money and that they are a burden to the economy.

he stresses that he is not being ungrateful. he says: “Everyone thinks this: that you come from Syria for money,” he says. “I get £5 a day, for food. £5? You start thinking about

how to borrow money from friends.”

he is skilled, he points out, and wants to work rather than harming the economy. he says he would have gladly worked in France if they would have had him stay. In fact, every country he went to said ‘we don’t care where you go, you just can’t stay here’, he says.

● From Page Threenationally is trying to talk about it, but it is still far from holding a coherent or agreed view.

Shadow immigration minister, Keir Starmer, visited oldham to find out about a borough that has long welcomed in people from all over the world.

he admits his tour of the country will not be an ‘easy ride’.

“I do accept that many

in the Labour party have not really wanted to have the difficult conversations with people about immigration,” he says.

“What Labour can’t do is start with the assumption there are some views we don’t want to hear or are somehow not legitimate.”

Where asylum seekers are concerned, he says the system is clearly not working. and both he and Mr McMahon point out

that the government – under heavy political pressure – has announced that each Syrian refugee it lets in under its latest aid programme will bring £20,000 of national funding to the area which puts them up.

That’s not the case for regular asylum seekers, however.

Mr Starmer notes the government has created a ‘false distinction’. Mr McMahon is more

forthright: “They should cough up for the rest.”

In the public’s mind, people are not neatly divided into ‘asylum seeker’ or ‘refugee’ or ‘economic migrant’, of course.

So often, local people begin to feel as though they are simply under siege. When I spoke to a group of asylum seekers for the first part of this project, they insisted English people were

hugely welcoming, during the course of recounting heartbreaking stories.

Like London, if perhaps to a lesser extent, the region – and the city at its heart – has been fuelled by immigration: from Irish to Jewish to Muslim.

But it might not be that simple when the influx is this large, and the communities are already so stretched by other problems.

Can we cope with so many asylum seekers? ‘We are at

‘Everyone thinks you come from Syria for money but I get £5 a day for food’

●● Coldhurst, Oldham

●● Mahmoud Afara fled Syria

●● Freehold estate in Rochdale

M.E.N. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2016 5Follow us on Twitter @MENnewsdesk

●● M.E.N. SPECIAL REPORT: As services in parts of Greater Manchester buckle under an influx of asylum seekers, residents hit out – insisting they are being realistic NOT racist. JENNIFER WILLIAMS examines the issues

‘THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T WANT THE ASYLUM SEEKERS IN THEIR IVORY TOWER’

FIVE thousand asylum seekers – the number, or thereabouts, currently living in Greater Manchester – sounds like a lot. The figure appears particularly startling, given that there are none at all in David Cameron’s local authority.

It’s important to get that into context.

There are 2.5m people living in Greater Manchester, meaning those people – many of whom have fled unimaginable persecution – account for only 0.2pc of the region’s population.

We should not forget that those who have fled persecution in centuries gone by have helped build our city, our communities.

The M.E.N. has been clear that our area should play its part in welcoming the latest wave of people seeking refuge from the Syrian war. We stand by that. Britain, and within it Greater Manchester, needs to hold out a helping hand.

But there are two reasons why the existing

situation is of growing concern. Firstly, the asylum seekers already living here have arrived with no government funding to help our already under-resourced northern public services cope.

They are not ‘taking our jobs’, as some believe, because they cannot legally work.

But they will still need the help of local authorities, schools, GPs and hospitals. And councils are picking up the bill for basic support because the government has cut that funding.

Charities are increasingly having to fill in the gaps, but there is only so much they are able to do.

It makes no sense for ministers to acknowledge the cost of a Syrian refugee to public services and not that of people in similar situations – those fleeing Afghanistan, say, or Iran.

Secondly, people with little in the way of

support, or often English skills, are being concentrated in some of the deprived parts of the region – areas that already feel they have more than their fair share of problems, including the quality and availability of affordable housing.

Even Labour, which has been traditionally reticent on this issue, is now speaking out on behalf of the communities affected.

Oldham West’s Labour MP is right to say that public support still exists. But he is also right to warn that it is fragile.

We are not calling for the door to be slammed in the faces of vulnerable people.

But an asylum system originally set up nearly a decade ago, for reasons that at the time made sense, is now not fit for purpose.

Not for the people within it, or for their neighbours.

saturation point’

We want to do our bit but help us to help others . . .

any more. “I want to see David Cameron’s constituency and all the other well-heeled towns and cities take their fair share,” he said.

Yet you can see why the Tories wouldn’t be madly keen. There is little political incentive to move asylum seekers out of Labour areas and into theirs. If you start housing asylum seekers in areas such as Windsor, Witney or Westminster again, the sheer amount of public funding required for

their rents would doubtless spark an outcry too.

Nine out of Oldham’s 20 council wards are now at official saturation point for asylum seekers, according to Jim McMahon. Yet the borough, like others across Greater Manchester, has consistently faced an unequal cut to its council funding since 2010.

On top of that, it emerged this week that Tory councils such as David Cameron’s in Oxfordshire are to receive an

emergency wave of bonus funding – areas that have already, in some cases, seen their funding rise as ours continues to plummet.

How much of that pot will go to Oldham, Rochdale, Manchester? Nothing. Oldham, and other places like it, is now facing a ‘perfect storm’ of high asylum numbers, thousands of new European workers, disproportionate cuts to public services and – in JMr McMahon’s words – ‘crappy jobs’.