broadening participation in the assessment of student communication skills joan hawthorne university...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
223 views
TRANSCRIPT
Broadening Participation in the Assessment of Student Communication SkillsJoan HawthorneUniversity of North Dakota
Today’s AgendaIntroduction and overviewAssessment purposes and
participationBreakSharing ownership
◦Engaging faculty◦Building partnerships◦Student contributions
Conclusions and evaluations
Questions to consider
What do we mean by assessment?
What are we trying to accomplish when we do assessment?
Who are we doing assessment for?
Assessment at NIU: A method for analyzing and describing student learning outcomes or program achievement of objectives.
Assessment and the HLC: Organizations assess student learning in meaningful, useful, and workable ways to evaluate how they are achieving their commitments and to act on the results in ways that advance student learning and improve educational quality.
My own definition: Assessment usually means the systematic collection of information about achievement of desired student learning outcomes across a group of students.
TO CONSIDER: What do you want to get out of the work you put into assessment? What is motivating your current assessment work? Who’s using the findings? What would you like to motivate any new assessment efforts?
Possible purposes?ImprovementStudent-centerednessDecrease insularity, inertiaAccountabilityBecause we want “students to get the best possible education” (Suskie)
Other?
So, focusing on written communication…1. What do you mean?2. What will you accomplish?3. Who wants this information?THUS: What kinds of processes should be used? And who helps?
How can this assessment be conducted so that it does NOT fulfill the negative stereotypes about assessment?
What do faculty want?
Good assessments will “…reveal common values, provide opportunities for inquiry and debate about unsettled issues….”
CCCC Statement
“Who helps?” with assessment is an ownership question. Who will own this process? Who will own the findings?
Who could be involved?FacultyStudentsAdministratorsProfessional staffStakeholders from “outside”Other?
TO DISCUSS: What are the intrinsic motivations for involvement in assessment of writing upon which you could build? What roles might participants take?* consider for faculty* consider for students* consider for others
FacultyAs contributors
of student workAs participants in
planningAs participants in
scoringAs participants in
analysisAs participants in
loop-closing
To answer questions
Because they’ve contributed student work
Because they value the learning
Because they own the program
Because they’ll learn things about teaching
StudentsAs learnersAs contributorsAs criteria-
generatorsAs scorersAs participants in
analysisAs participants in
loop-closing
To accrue a portfolio
To get feedbackTo learn
“perspective” To take learning
seriouslyTo help with
accountabilityTo get a great
education
“Bringing students more actively into the processes of assessment may well be the most powerful route to greater faculty engagement.”
Pat Hutchings
What tools or strategies would motivate your faculty to be involved?What tools or strategies would motivate your students to be involved?What about other participants?
As Lee Shulman, educator and author, wrote, “We are limited in our recounting by the instruments we use to count.” He’s right. And assessment which doesn’t provide useful answers to real questions about teaching and learning is assessment that wastes our time.
“OK, I admit it: I like assessment. I like it because it encourages faculty members to think more carefully about what they do, how they do it, and why they do it that way. I like it because it helps raise questions about how our teaching strategies affect learning outcomes. And I like it because in the process we discover more about how our teaching fits with programs and curricula beyond our own courses.”
Theodore Wagenaar