bucharest, 16-17 may 2013
DESCRIPTION
Bucharest, 16-17 May 2013. SOME GENERAL ASPECTS ON DAIRY CATTLE IN ROMANIA H. GROSU, I.N.C.D.B.N.A.-BALOTESTI. ITEMS. AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL CONTRIBUTION ON GDP; CONTRIBUTION OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY TO AGRICULTURAL SECTOR; EVOLUTION OF THE LIVESTOCK; MILK PRODUCTION; - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Bucharest, 16-17 May 2013
SOME GENERAL ASPECTS ON DAIRY CATTLE IN ROMANIA
H. GROSU, I.N.C.D.B.N.A.-BALOTESTI
ITEMS• AGRICULTURAL LAND;• AGRICULTURAL CONTRIBUTION ON GDP;• CONTRIBUTION OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY TO
AGRICULTURAL SECTOR;• EVOLUTION OF THE LIVESTOCK;• MILK PRODUCTION;• MILK CONSUMTION;• EVOLUTION OF THE FORAGE SUPPLY;• SOME CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE IBNA INSTITUTE
TO SUPPORT THE DAIRY SECTOR IN ROMANIA
Agricultural land, by destination
Contribution of agriculture, forestry and fishery to the GDP
Evolution
Livestock numbers1989-2012
EVOLUTION of the total livestock and of the origin livestock in
1989 – 2012(Source: INS, MADR 2013) – mil. animals
Origin livestock per county, %, in 2013 (Source, MADR 2013)
Evolution of cattle farm size, 2007 - 2012 (Source, MADR 2013)
EVOLUTION of the proportion of artificial insemination in 1992 – 2012
(Source: ANARZ, 2013)
EVOLUTIONof the cows in MILK RECORDING in 1995 – 2012
(Source: ANARZ, 2013)
Livestock production2001-2012
Average production per animal
EVOLUTIONof the average milk production – liters/cow, in 1989 – 2012
(Source: INS, MADR 2013)
MILK YIELD/COW IN SOME COUNTRIES(Source: EUROSTAT, 2011)
9616 95839118
8152 81317595 7570
7103 7011 6773
3583
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Top 10 herds belonging to RGCA
No.
HERD
County
No.
cattle
Total lactation 305 D lactation (EM)
L Kg G Kg P Kg L Kg G Kg P Kg
1 HEJJA GERGELY I.I. Covasna 8 11032.2 446.4 368.5 8987.3 365.3 309.5
2 Ferma Badeana Vaslui 48 10572.8 441.0 384.2 9440.9 397.5 332.6
3 SC GHENIA FARM SRL Ialomita 247 9893.6 372.6 336.8 7890.3 297.6 285.0
4 TOP STAR 2000 SRL Covasna 23 9614.2 356.5 310.7 7899.4 293.6 264.1
5 FERMA TARZII Vaslui 94 9206.1 393.1 340.4 7640.5 327.2 290.9
6 AGRO-VET-SRL Covasna 19 9051.2 355.6 287.9 7484.7 295.7 239.9
7 MILK-PROD SRL Covasna 52 7789.6 309.8 256.5 7349.2 291.0 250.7
8 S.C. AGROINVEST SRL Iasi 29 7652.3 307.9 257.1 7023.9 284.0 239.3
9I.F. MUNTEANU
VIORICA Iasi 21 7578.1 307.0 257.1 6212.7 252.5 215.5
10S.C. Horticola
International Sevis Sibiu 105 7488.5 295.8 260.6 6386.2 252.6 236.8
EVOLUTIONof the total milk production – thousands hl, in 2001 – 2012
(Source, MADR 2013)
EVOLUTIONof the production of commercial milk – thousands hl, in 2001 – 2012
(Source, MADR 2013)
Forage supply1990-2012
Cultivated area
Alfalfa + clover – thousand hectares (Source: INS 2012)
Area cultivated with main crops – cereal grains, oleaginous and green forages, %
(Source: INS 2013)
Consumption of meat, milk and eggs in 2020
[kg.(nr.)/capita/year]
Specification MU 2010 (%) 2020 (%) 2020/2010 (%) EU
Cattle meat Kg 6.6 (11.4) 8.9 (12.40) 35
Sheep meat Kg 1.9 (3.2) 2.4 (3.34) 24
Pig meat Kg 29.9 (51.64) 34.3 (47.77) 15
Poultry meat Kg 19.5 (33.68) 26.2 (36.49) 34.1
Total meat Kg 57.9 (100.0) 71.8 (100.0) 24
Cow milk L 200 300 50
Eggs Pcs. 275 293 7
Consumption of meat, milk and eggsin 2020 (kg/capita/year)
To/ha2010
To/ha2020
Total production (thousand to)
For animal consumption(thousand to)
Area (thousand ha)
2010 2020 2010 2020 2010 2020
TOTAL CEREAL CROPS
16 149 24 987 5573.26 4777.0 6300.0
Corn 4.3 4.5 9060.7 15075 2787.95 2108.7 3350
Wheat + rye 2.7 3.5 5774.2 8400.0 1641.64 2150.5 2400
Barley + two-row barley
2.5 2.75 1314.1 1512.0 1143.67 517.8 550
Soya 2.4 2.5 149.9 1250 376.74 63.9 500
Sunflower 1.6 1.7 1267.4 1870 673.21 793.7 1100
Silages 30 20617.94
Fresh forages 7720.33
Hay 3312.36
FORAGE CROPS FOR ANIMAL PRODUCTION: PRESENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS (2020; Source: MADR)
PROSPECTIVE REQUIREMENT OF CROP AREA FOR ANIMAL NUTRITION (2020) (thousand ha: IBNA data)
Forage Cattle Sheep and goats Total ruminants
Total poultry Pigs TOTAL
Corn 213,46 145,59 359,05 158,91 190,01 707,97Wheat + rye 149,66 127,75 277,41 117,15 131,69 526,25Barley 333,95 109,76 443,71 0 13,17 456,88
TOTAL CEREAL GRAIN CROPS 697,07 383,10 1080,17 276,06 334,87 1691,10
% OF THE TOTAL ARABLE AREA 33% 33% 33% 44% 56% 37%
Peas 168,56 209,41 377,97 73,22 0 451,19Soya beans 225,09 51,15 276,24 148,32 131,57 556,13Sunflower meal 345,23 243,34 588,57 120,89 133,06 842,52Rapeseed meal 0 0 0 5,76 0 5,76TOTAL PROTEIN
FORAGES 738,88 503,90 1.242,78 348,19 264,63 1.855,60
% OF THE TOTAL ARABLE AREA 35% 44% 38% 56% 44% 41%
Fresh forages 109.72 144.85 254.57 0 0 254.57Silage 346.64 51.52 398.16 0 0 398.16Hay 178.63 35.80 214.43 0 0 214.43Rooty plants 65.98 38.55 104.53 0 0 104.53
TOTAL BULK FEDS 700.97 270.72 971.69 0 0 971.69
% OF THE TOTAL ARABLE AREA 32% 23% 29% 0 0 22%
Grand total 2136.92 1157.72 3294.64 624.25 599.50 4518.39
Some Contributions of the IBNA Institute to Support Dairy Cattle Sector in Romania
I. Provide a wide range of products for all farm animals species (including dairy cows):
- BIOCONS – biological preservative preparation used at forage ensiling
- BOVILACT – biological additive used in cattle feeding- Protein-vitamin-mineral concentrates (CPVM) for cattle;- Catalogue with vitamin-mineral mixes (ZOOFORT) and premixes- Guidebook for assessing the nutritive value of feeds for ruminant- Guidebook with diet formulation for dairy cows
II. Performs the technologic transfer by marketing a wide
range of products for all farm animals species (including dairy cows) and categories developed by animal trials
Some Contributions of the IBNA Institute to Support Dairy Cattle Sector in Romania
III. Provides various services to farmers: - Chemical analysis of feed;- Chemical analysis of milk (for farmers included in Milk
Recorded Schemes);- Estimation of the Breeding Values for dairy cattle belonged to
the General Dairy Cattle Association from Romania
HISTORY OF GENETIC EVALUATIONMETHODS IN DAIRY CATTLE
(http://www.aps.uoguelph.ca/~lrs/GROSU/BOOK.html ; January 2013)
• Horia Grosu, Romania• Larry Schaeffer, Canada• Pascal Anton Oltenacu,
U.S.A.• Duane Norman, U.S.A.• Rex Powell, U.S.A.• Valentin Kremer, United
Kingdom
• Georgios Banos, Greece• Raphael Mrode, UK• Julio Carvalheira,
Portugal• Janusz Jamrozik,
Canada• Corneliu Draganescu,
Romania
HISTORY OF GENETIC EVALUATIONMETHODS IN DAIRY CATTLE
(http://www.aps.uoguelph.ca/~lrs/GROSU/BOOK.html ; January 2013)
• 1. Genetic Evaluations
I. YEARS 1920-1970
2. Daughter-Dam Comparisons3. Selection Index 4. Contemporary Comparisons5. USDA Modifed Contemporary
Comparisons 6. Cumulative Differences7. Regressed Least Squares
II YEARS 1971-20008. Linear Models 9. Sire Models 10. Animal Models .11. International Models (MACE-INTERBULL;
UPPSALA) 12. Multiple Traits 13. Test Day Models 14. Genetic Change15. Threshold Models 16. Survival Analysis
III YEARS 2001-present 17. Genomics Era