building intui+onbuilding intui+on for low frequency high consequence events clinton a. culp, ph.d....

22
Building Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Upload: others

Post on 07-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Building Intui+on for

Low Frequency High Consequence

Events

ClintonA.Culp,Ph.D.MontanaStateUniversityBillings

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 2: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Whatwewillcover•  Frequency/ConsequenceCon?nuum• Howwemakedecisions• Howtobuildourintui?ons

Whatwewilldo

• Buildandconductapre-mortem• Conductapost-mortem(aHerincidentreview)• Designandconductarealis?cdecision-makingexercise(DMX)

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 3: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Situa1on:Youarepreparingtoleadagroupof4peopleonanovernightbackcountryski/snowboardtripintotheTetons,WYwiththegoalofskiing/snowboarding“ShoottheMoon”andotherrunsinthearea.Yourpar?cipantsreporttheyhaveaboveaverageskiing/snowboardingability.Yousentthegearlistoutbuthavenotheardbackfromthem.Youwillmeetthemforthefirst?meintwodaysatthetrailhead.Thetrailheadisatabout6,500feet,youplanoncampingataround9,500feetandthehighpassisat10,200feet,10+milesroundtripnotincludingtheotherruns.Theweatherthelastfewdayshasbeensunnyandstablewithbelowfreezingtemperaturesduringthedayandbelow0Ofatnight.Theforecastforthenext4dayscallsforthesamebutthereisafrontmovinginfromthewestanditisexpectedtoputupto10inchesofnewsnowonthemountains.Avalancheforecasthasbeenfavorable,moderateonallaspectsandeleva?ons.

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 4: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Insmallgroups(4or5)comeupwithascenarioandconductaPre-Mortemandanswerthefollowingques?ons.Questions 1.  What can fail/go wrong? (Prioritize based on consequence and frequency.) 2.  What caused the failure (there may be more than one cause for each

failure)? Cycle through questions 3-5 for each failure point. 3.  What would an expert do that a novice would not do (ask if needed)? 4.  How do we get reliable and timely feedback? What cues need to be

attended to? 5.  What is the real (core) skill that needs to be developed/learned? How do

we acquire that skill.

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 5: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Pre-Mortems Describe&Prep(i.e.,whatisthesitua?on…theplanhasfailed).1.  Describewhatcanfail/gowrong.•  Priori?zebasedonconsequence&frequency.

2.  Whatcausedeachfailure(possiblemorethanonecause)?•  LackoforPoor:

•  Technical,Communica?on,Intra/InterPersonalSkills,etc.

•  Uncertainty•  Missing/TooMuchInforma?on•  Distrust/InconsistentInforma?on•  Irrelevant/TooComplex

Cyclethrough3-5foreachfailurepoint.3.  Whatwouldanexpertdothata

novicewouldnotdo(ask)?4.  Howdowegetreliableand

?melyfeedback?•  Whatcuesneedtobeadendedto.

5.  Whatisthereal(core)skillthatneedstobedeveloped/learned?•  Howdoweacquirethatskill?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 6: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Building Intui+on Designing and Implemen+ng a Deliberate Training Program

• ConductPre-Mortems(beforeincidentreviews)• ConductPost-Mortems(aHerincidentreviews)• Don’tforgetthegood!

• Designandconductrealis?cDecision-MakingExercises(DMX)•  Createstress–with?melimitsand/orpop-inon-the-flyDMXs

•  JournalyourdecisionsinthefieldtocomparetoPre-Mortems• Prac?ceDecision-MakinginContext(oratclosetoitaspossible)

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 7: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Frequency/Consequence Con+nuum

HighFrequency

HighConsequence

LowFrequency

HighConsequence

HighFrequency

LowConsequence

LowFrequencyLow

Consequence

Frequency

Conseq

uence

Thevastmajorityofdecisionshavediscre?onary?me-to-task.Wehave?metothink!

Theyarenot?mecompe??vewithregardtolife,limb,oreyesight.

Asmallminorityarenon-discre?onary?me-to-task.Wedonothave?metothink!

Theyare?mecompe??vewithregardtolife,limb,oreyesight.

FrequencyandConsequencearerela?vetoyourrisktolerance.

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 8: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

How we make decisions • System1(default)2(LimbicSystem)•  Fastandautomated•  Thereislidleornoeffortorsenseofcontrol• Cogni?velyfrugal• Decisionscometomindwithoutawarenessofthecuesthatevokeanobviousevalua?onoftheirstrength

• PadernRecogni?on• Recogni?onPrimedDecision-Making2

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 9: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

How we make decisions •  System2(overload/fallback)1(PrefrontalCortex/CentralExecu?ve)

•  Slowerandmorecontrolled•  Moreeffornulandthereisawithasenseofcontrol•  Cogni?velyexpensive•  Decisionscometomindwithanawarenessofcuesthatevokeanobviousevalua?onoftheirstrength

•  Systems&Checklists3

• DomainSpecificExper?se4•  Expertdecision-maker'sSystem1closertoSystem2

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 10: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Dual-Process Model

of Judgment

and Decision-Making5

Stressors(hungry, sleep, etc)

Stressors(hungry, sleep, etc)

Decision Maker’sExpertise(DME)

Decision Maker’sExpertise(DME) Attention

(Situational Awareness)

Attention(Situational Awareness)

Decision PointRecognition

Decision PointRecognition

Act on Course of Action (COA)

Act on Course of Action (COA)

NoSystem 1

YesSystem 2

ReceiveFeedback

(High v Low Validity)(Internal &/or External)

ReceiveFeedback

(High v Low Validity)(Internal &/or External)

Lack of Situational Awareness (SA)

&Events Act on

Decision Maker

Lack of Situational Awareness (SA)

&Events Act on

Decision Maker

No

Decision Complexity(simple/complex)

Heuristics & BiasesDecision Consequences

(low to high)

Decision Complexity(simple/complex)

Heuristics & BiasesDecision Consequences

(low to high)

Identify PossibleCOA

Identify PossibleCOA

Act onCOA

Act onCOA

ReceiveFeedback

(High or Low Validity) (Internal &/or External)

ReceiveFeedback

(High or Low Validity) (Internal &/or External)

RecognizeHeuristics

AndBiases

RecognizeHeuristics

AndBiases

Did COAWork

Did COAWork

Exit & Move to next DP

Process Task

Exit & Move to next DP

Process TaskYES

Did COAWork

Did COAWork

Exit & Move to next DP

Process Task

Exit & Move to next DP

Process TaskYES

No

COAOutcomePrediction

(mental simulation)

COAOutcomePrediction

(mental simulation)

No

Has the Situation Changed?

Has the Situation Changed?

No

Yes

EnvironmentalFactors

(weather, visibility,etc.)

EnvironmentalFactors

(weather, visibility,etc.)

Yes/No

Yes/No

Probably Does Not Work

ChooseCOA

ChooseCOA

Probably Works

Yes

No –!Overload / Incongruent Cues

State Traits of DMEGeneral Self-Efficacy

Impulse Sensation SeekingAttentional ControlEmotion Regulation

(Reappraisal/Suppression)Tolerance of Ambiguity

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 11: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Post-Mortem Don’tforgettopost-morgentheGOOD!•  Asbestyoucan,reconstructthe?melineofeventsanddecisionpoints.Some?mesdiagrams/photoshelp.

Cyclethroughthefollowingques?onsforeachdecision:1.  Whywasthisdifficult?2.  Howwasthesitua?oninterpreted.3.  Inhindsight,whatwerethered-flags,cuesandpadernsthatyoushould

haveseen(proximalanddistal)?4.  Whywasthecourseofac?ontaken?5.  Whatcouldhavebeendonedifferently?6.  Whattraining/educa?onneedstooccurtobecomebeder?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 12: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Post-Mortem:Ms.KuoandherdaughterwerepassengersinaraHthatwaspartofagroupthatincludedotherraHsandboats.AmongtheotherpassengersinMs.Kuo’sraHwasaguidewhowasanemployeeoftheraHcompany.Duringthetrip,apar?cipantfelloutofakayakandMs.Kuo’sraHwasdirectedtotheriverbankbytheguide,whogotoutwithathrowrope.Theguidetossedoneendoftherope,thepar?cipantswamtowardtheraHandgrabbedit,whichcausedanotherpassengerintheraHtofallintothewater.Atthispointtheguidethrewtheen?reropeintoMs.Kuo’sraH.Oneendoftheropebecamecaughtunderthewater,andtheotherendwrappedaroundMs.Kuo’slowerrightlegandbegancrushingit.Ms.Kuoshoutedtotheguidetocuttheropewithaknifetofreeherleg,buttheguiderepliedthathedidnothaveaknife.Heshoutedtotheseniorguideandtheotherguidestobringhimaknife,butnoonehadone.AtthispointtheguideinMs.Kuo’sraHfrozeanddidnothing.Ms.Kuoaskedhimtojumpintotherivertotryandfreetherope.HewasabletocreateenoughslackontheropethatitcouldberemovedfromMs.Kuo’sleg.EventuallytheguideswereabletomoveMs.Kuotoshorewhereshewasinexcrucia?ngpainandsufferingfromrespiratoryandcirculatoryproblems.Theguidesdidnothavecommunica?onequipmentwiththemsotheycouldnotcontactoutsidesourcesforhelp.Oneoftheguidesrantoaroadtolocateatelephoneandcallforhelp.AHerthreehours,Ms.Kuowastransportedtoahospital.Onceathome,Ms.Kuowasseenbyavascularsurgeonandotherphysicians,whodiagnosedastrangula?oninjurytoherlowerrightleg.Inaddi?on,herphysiciansreferredherforpsychologicaltreatment.(Adarian,A.,2012,p.52)

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 13: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Incident:

Ms.KuoandherdaughterwerepassengersinaraHthatwaspartofagroupthatincludedotherraHsandboats.AmongtheotherpassengersinMs.Kuo’sraHwasaguidewhowasanemployeeoftheraHcompany.Duringthetrip,apar?cipantfelloutofakayakandMs.Kuo’sraHwasdirectedtotheriverbankbytheguide,whogotoutwithathrowrope.Theguidetossedoneendoftherope,thepar?cipantswamtowardtheraHandgrabbedit,whichcausedanotherpassengerintheraHtofallintothewater.Atthispointtheguidethrewtheen?reropeintoMs.Kuo’sraH.

Oneendoftheropebecamecaughtunderthewater,andtheotherendwrappedaroundMs.Kuo’slowerrightlegandbegancrushingit.Ms.Kuoshoutedtotheguidetocuttheropewithaknifetofreeherleg,buttheguiderepliedthathedidnothaveaknife.Heshoutedtotheseniorguideandtheotherguidestobringhimaknife,butnoonehadone.

AtthispointtheguideinMs.Kuo’sraHfrozeanddidnothing.Ms.Kuoaskedhimtojumpintotherivertotryandfreetherope.HewasabletocreateenoughslackontheropethatitcouldberemovedfromMs.Kuo’sleg.

EventuallytheguideswereabletomoveMs.Kuotoshorewhereshewasinexcrucia?ngpainandsufferingfromrespiratoryandcirculatoryproblems.Theguidesdidnothavecommunica?onequipmentwiththemsotheycouldnotcontactoutsidesourcesforhelp.Oneoftheguidesrantoaroadtolocateatelephoneandcallforhelp.AHerthreehours,Ms.Kuowastransportedtoahospital.

Onceathome,Ms.Kuowasseenbyavascularsurgeonandotherphysicians,whodiagnosedastrangula?oninjurytoherlowerrightleg.Inaddi?on,herphysiciansreferredherforpsychologicaltreatment.(Adarian,A.,2012,p.52)

Questions Asbestyoucan,reconstructthe?melineofeventsanddecisionpoints.Whywasthisdifficult?Howwasthissitua?oninterpreted?Inhindsight,whatwerethered-flags,cuesandpadernsthatyoushouldhaveseen(proximalanddistal)?Whywasthecourseofac?ontaken?Whatcouldhavebeendonedifferently?Whattraining/educa?onneedstooccurtobecomebeder?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 14: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Psychological State Traits that Effect Decision-Making11

• GeneralizedSelf-Efficacy6(higherinexperts)

• AGen1onalControl&Vigilance7(higherinexperts)

•  Emo1onalRegula1on8(higherinexperts)•  Reappraisal–higherinexperts•  Suppression–lowerinexperts

•  ToleranceforAmbiguity9(higherwithexperts)

•  Impulsivity10(lowerinexperts,expertsaveragetogeneralpopula?on)

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 15: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Decision-Making Exercise (DMX) Rules•  Thereisnoabsoluterightanswer…itisabouttheprocess.•  Simplescenario,thustherewillincompleteinforma?onthatwillrequireyoutomakeassump?ons.•  Solvetheproblemdonotcri?quetheproblem.

•  Imposed?melimit•  5-10minfordecision&~30mintotal

•  Youmustcommunicateyourdecisionorallytothegroup.•  Bespecificastowho,what,how(maybe),when,where,why(maybe);nogeneraliza?onsorhypothe?cals.

•  Play•  Solitaire,GrouporTwo-Sided

Explainyourdecision-makingprocess• Whyyoumadethedecisionyoumade?• Whatwereyourop?ons?• Whatwerethefactors/considera?onsforemostonyourmind?• Whatassump?ons,ifany,didyoumakeaboutthesitua?on?• Whatwouldyouhavelikedtohaveknown…ornotknown?•  Onwhatprinciples,concepts,valueswasyourplanbased?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 16: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Background:Youareleadingagroupoffivebackpackers(BillandJoan,BeccaandMad,andJim)intheBeartoothMountainsonthree-daytripupBlackCanyonofftheLakeForkTrail.YourgoalistocampthefirstnightattheheadwaterofBlackCanyonLakethencutcrosscountrymakingthepasstotheeastofMountRearguardandspendthenextnightatMoonLakethenhikeHellroaringPlateautothehightrailheadwhereyouhaveafriendscheduledtopickyouuptheaHernoonofthethirdday.BillandJoan,amarriedcouple,arefitbuthavenotbackpackedinseveralyears.TheyeachhavecurrentFirstAid/CPRtraining.BeccaandMadareengaged,fitandhavebackpackedquiteabitinthesoutherndesertofUtahbutneverinthemountainsofMontana.BeccatookawildernessfirstaidclassfouryearsagoandMadhashadnomedicaltraining.MadalsohasTypeIIDiabetes.Jimisveryfitbutthisishisfirstbackpackingtripandheseemedverynervouswhenthegroupencounteredasnakeonthetrailyesterday.Youhavethefirstaidkitandallhavebearsprayandpriortodepar?ngyoucheckedforunderstandingonwhattodoiftheyencounterabear.Youcurrentlyhavenocellcoverageandarenotcarryingasat-phone.Itismid-morningtheseconddayandyouareheadinguptothepassfromBlackCanyonLake.Beccaspotsagrizzlybearabout100yardsupslopefromthegrouptothesoutheast.Asyoustarttosimultaneouslytellthegroupwhattodoandlookforanycubs.Withoutanyexplana?onJimstartsmovingfast(running)backtowardthelakeandthenyouspotit…acub.Jimdoesnotrealizethatheisrunningrighttowardit.Thentheworsthappens,thesowtakesoffaHerJim.Whatdoyoudonow?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 17: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Thereisnosinglecorrectanswer;however,theremaybeawrongorlessthandesirableanswer.

Title:BearAdack

Background:Youareleadingagroupoffivebackpackers(BillandJoan,BeccaandMad,andJim)intheBeartoothMountainsonthree-daytripupBlackCanyonofftheLakeForkTrail.YourgoalistocampthefirstnightattheheadwaterofBlackCanyonLakethencutcrosscountrymakingthepasstotheeastofMountRearguardandspendthenextnightatMoonLakethenhikeHellroaringPlateautothehightrailheadwhereyouhaveafriendscheduledtopickyouuptheaHernoonofthethirdday.

BillandJoan,amarriedcouple,arefitbuthavenotbackpackedinseveralyears.TheyeachhavecurrentFirstAid/CPRtraining.BeccaandMadareengaged,fitandhavebackpackedquiteabitinthesoutherndesertofUtahbutneverinthemountainsofMontana.BeccatookawildernessfirstaidclassfouryearsagoandMadhashadnomedicaltraining.MadalsohasTypeIIDiabetes.Jimisveryfitbutthisishisfirstbackpackingtripandheseemedverynervouswhenthegroupencounteredasnakeonthetrailyesterday.Youhavethefirstaidkitandallhavebearsprayandpriortodepar?ngyoucheckedforunderstandingonwhattodoiftheyencounterabear.Youcurrentlyhavenocellcoverageandarenotcarryingasat-phone.

Itismid-morningtheseconddayandyouareheadinguptothepassfromBlackCanyonLake.Beccaspotsagrizzlybearabout100yardsupslopefromthegrouptothesoutheast.Asyoustarttosimultaneouslytellthegroupwhattodoandlookforanycubs.Withoutanyexplana?onJimstartsmovingfast(running)backtowardthelakeandthenyouspotit…acub.Jimdoesnotrealizethatheisrunningrighttowardit.Thentheworsthappens,thesowtakesoffaHerJim.Whatdoyoudonow?

Requirement:Within5minutes:Writedownwhatyoutellyourgroupmemberstodo?Bespecificastowho,what,how(maybe),when,where,why(maybe);nogeneraliza?onsorhypothe?cals.

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 18: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Decision-Making Exercise (DMX) Explainyourdecision-makingprocess• Whyyoumadethedecisionyoumade?• Whatwereyourop?ons?• Whatwerethefactors/considera?onsforemostonyourmind?• Whatassump?ons,ifany,didyoumakeaboutthesitua?on?• Whatwouldyouhavelikedtohaveknown…ornotknown?•  Onwhatprinciples,concepts,valueswasyourplanbased?

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 19: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Meaningful Experience leads to beQer intui+on

TheParadoxofExperience1• Howdowegetmeaningfulrealworldexperiences?•  Some?mesweonlygetoneshotattheexperience.

Iden?fyandunderstand

requirementsofyourjob.

DeliberatePrac?cethedifficultdecisions

incontext.

DeliberateReviewofDecision-MakingExperiences

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 20: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Ac+on Steps 1.  Bedeliberateaboutyourprocess,wecangainexperience,toagreaterorlessor

degree,vicariously.2.  IncorporatePre-Mortems,Post-Mortems,andDMXsintoyourregularstaff

training.3.  Ifyouhavetheability…slowdown…beinten?onalinyourdecision!•  Youwillbeabletoiden?fylowfrequency,highconsequence,non-discre?onary?me-to-taskeventsandconductapre-mortemthatwillhelpyourstaffreducerisk.

•  Youwillbeabletodesignandconductarealis?cdecision-makingexercisesthatwillhelpyouandyourstaffgainsimulatedexperiencesoflowfrequencyhighconsequenceevents.

•  Youandyourstaffwillbeabletoconductacri?calaHerreviewofanincident,ornearmiss,designedtogivedetailedfeedbackandimprovethedecision-makingprocessandqualityoflowfrequency,highconsequence,non-discre?onary?me-to-taskevents.

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 21: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

References 1. Klein, G. (2003). The power of intuition (Paperback ed.). New York: Doubleday. 2. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral &

Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645. 3. Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books.Budner, S. (1962).

Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep8933446 4. Klein, G., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fireground. Paper presented at the Human

Factors and Ergonomics Society 30th Annual Meeting, Norwood, NJ. 5. Culp, C. A. (2016). Judgment and decision-making in outdoor adventure leadership: A dual-process model. Journal of Outdoor

Recreation, Education and Leadership, 8(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2016-V8-I1-7380 6. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal

and control beliefs, 35-37. 7. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of

Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 225. 8. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect,

Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 9. Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29. doi:

10.1111/1467-6494.ep8933446Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

10. Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, D.C., USA: American Psychological Association.

11. Culp (working)

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016

Page 22: Building Intui+onBuilding Intui+on for Low Frequency High Consequence Events Clinton A. Culp, Ph.D. Montana State University Billings This document may not be reproduced without the

Building Intui+on

ClintonA.Culp,Ph.D.Major,USMC(Ret)[email protected]

This document may not be reproduced without the consent of the author. WRMC 2016