WEEKENDWEEKENDEDITIONEDITION

ELECTIONELECTIONWATCHWATCH20162016

MILWAUKEE COMMUNITY JOURNAL

VOL. XXXIII NO. 41 APRIL 1, 2016 50 CENTSBULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN PERMIT 4668

SPECIAL FOCUS

In 1988, the late Ed Brown, then-ex-ecutive director of the Voter EducationProject, watched as the DemocraticParty ignored blacks’ growing dis-pleasure with Massachusetts Gover-nor and Democratic presidentialnominee Michael Dukakis. The party assumed blacks had little choice but to support

Dukakis since the only alternative would be to defect andvote Republican—an option ostensibly more unattractivethan an inattentive Dukakis campaign. The party waswrong: Black voter turnout rate plummeted by nearly 5 per-cent, the second largest decline for this bloc ever observed.In the lead up to the 1992 presidential election, Brown

admonished an overconfident Democratic Party for againtaking the black vote for granted. Lest its short memory fuelundue overconfidence, he famously reminded the party,“The view is that blacks have nowhere else to go, butblacks always have somewhere to go—they can go fish-ing.”And the intervening years have largely borne him out.

African Americans overwhelmingly back Democratic can-didates in presidential and congressional elections—aver-aging about 88 percent support since 1980. And pollingfrom past elections has shown that blacks are more likelyto stay home on Election Day than to switch their vote toRepublican presidential candidates. The black electoratemostly votes for Democrats, or not at all. But that may fi-nally be changing.The most commonly cited explanation for this phenome-

non is the “black utility heuristic,” a framework developedby University of Chicago professor Michael Dawson in1994. More commonly referred to as linked fate, it’s thesentiment among blacks that one’s prospects are ultimately

tied to the success of the race. In his seminal book Behind the Mule: Race and Class in

African-American Politics, Dawson argues that becauserace has been the predominant factor in blacks’ Americanexperience, “it was much more efficient for them to use thestatus of the group, both relative and absolute, as a proxyfor individual utility.” In more practical terms, black voters

prioritize the well-being of the group over their individual in-terests, and consider what’s best for the group as a wholebecause history has shown them that “we are in this thingtogether.”The cohesiveness of young African Americans remains

strong, and is the genesis of the increasing social-protestactivity in response to issues like the Confederate battleflag in South Carolina and aggressive policing of black peo-ple nationwide. Yet after several years of surging voter participation rates

by black young adults, their turnout fell by nearly 7 percentin 2012. Taken together, these may signal the erosion of linked

fate’s effect on political behavior, which would constitute atectonic shift in how black voters are viewed.A reliance on heuristics is not unique to African Ameri-

cans. Nearly every voter employs them to some extent.Tracking every nuance in each statute and every action ofeach elected official is an enormous investment of time andeffort, so Americans tend to rely on heuristics, or shortcuts,that ease their decision-making process. What has set blacks apart is the magnitude and unifor-

mity to which they utilized the racial heuristic in their politicalbehavior, rising to a level not observed in any other votingbloc.For that reason, linked fate is most evident when exam-

ining black voting behavior. The black electorate’s decades-long, near-uniform support for the Democratic Party is anoccurrence unparalleled by any other race, ethnicity, orgender demographic in the modern political landscape. Assuch, the most considered question about black voters inthe opening overtures of the 2016 presidential election iswhether they’ll turn out to support Hillary Clinton or simply“go fishing.” Any prediction that a significant chunk of the electorate

will vote for the Republican presidential nominee is deemed

CAN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY RETAINITS HOLD ON BLACK VOTERS?Decades of overwhelming support could be evaporating, as new generations of African Americansgrapple with novel choices. By THEODORE R. JOHNSON, courtesy of theatlantic.com, posted SEP 7, 2015

Whitney Curtis / Reuters via The Atlantic Magazine website

(continued on page 4)

“Black voters prioritize the well-being of thegroup over theirindividual interests because historyhas shown themthat ‘we are in thisthing together.’”

Opinion and comments expressed on the Perspectives page do not nec-essarily reflect the views of the publisher or management of the MCJ. Let-ters and “other perspectives” are accepted but may be edited for contentand length.

MCJ STAFF:Patricia O’Flynn -PattilloPublisher, CEORobert J. ThomasAssoc. PublisherTodd Thomas, Vice Pres.Mikel Holt, Assoc. PublisherThomas E. Mitchell, Jr., EditorTeretha Martin, Billing Dept./Publisher’s Admin.Assist.Technical

Consultant/WebmasterColleen Newsom,Classified AdvertisingJimmy V. Johnson, SalesRep.CONTRIBUTING WRITERS:Fr. Carl Diederichs, Rev. Joe McLin, PHOTOGRAPHER: YvonneKemp

EDITIONPhone: 414-265-5300 (Advertising and Administration) •

414-265-6647 (Editorial) • Website: communityjournal.net • Email: Edito-rial@communityjournal.net/Advertising@communityjournal.net

MILWAUKEE COMMUNITY JOURNAL

WEEKENDWEEKEND

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 2

--Martin Luther King, Jr.

REMEMBER!VOTEAPRIL5!

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 3

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 4

to be nothing more than an interesting exercise in impractical punditry.The allegiance typically occurs despite the demonstrable fact thatblacks hold a variety of policy views and are not entirely aligned to theDemocratic Party’s platform—a reality best seen in direct-democracyreferendums from California to North Carolina where blacks have beensplit, particularly on social issues.Linked fate, in a political context, suggests that black voters approach

elections with one simple question: Which candidate is better for theAfrican American population? The analysis begins at the most funda-mental level by ascertaining which party or candidate is most likely toprotect civil rights and support equal access to economic opportunityfor blacks. Everything else is secondary. For example, a politician’s stance on renewable energy, free market

economics, abortion, immigration, national debt, and role of the militaryin regional conflicts all pale in comparison to basic considerations of lib-erty.African Americans may ask themselves: Can we vote? Can we work?

Can we prosper? Can we live? With game-changing statutes like theCivil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 being signed intolaw by a Democratic president and routinely the target of Republicanopposition, the Democratic candidate immediately emerges as the pre-ferred candidate. A recent study also shows that when the candidate is black, the ef-

fects of descriptive representation raises the level of black voter partic-ipation and support even higher—an occurrence confirmed by historicalblack turnout rates in the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections.A competing view of linked fate is that black voters are not loyal to

the party, but to each other at a deeper level than other races and eth-nicities. A centuries-long history grounded in the shared experience of racial

subjugation and discrimination produced a common bond amongAfrican Americans that leads them to view the world through the sameprism. No matter how respectable and educated an African American was

in the early 20th century, he or she was unlikely to be granted civil-rightsprotections until they were guaranteed for the whole race. The remnantsof such views are still seen today, most prominently evinced in the BlackLives Matter movement. In short, there is no personal liberty withoutgroup liberty.The uniform support of the Democratic Party may begin to erode in

the post-Obama era. New research suggests that the political utility oflinked fate has waned. Two recent papers—one from Harvard University and another from

Harvard professor Jennifer Hochschild and Yale professor VeslaWeaver—argue that the impact of the linked-fate framework, now over20 years old, on political views and participation has effectively beenovercome by the influence of economic class on policy preferences.The original conception of linked fate was crafted based on the be-

havior of black voters who lived through the Civil Rights Movement orwere born shortly thereafter. There was more uniformity in the African American experience for the

civil-rights era generations. But since then, three new generations of blacks have entered the

electorate with a wider range of lived experiences and views than thoseof their parents and grandparents. Hochschild and Weaver found that income inequality among blacks

today is higher than all other racial and ethnic groups, and that blackswith better economic well-being are much less likely to be victims of vi-olent crime than those who are poor. This produces tangible stratifications in the African American experi-

ence that has ramifications in black political behavior. The authors alsocontend linked fate has taken on a form of social, not political, solidar-ity—and this may be welcome news to Republicans.While data shows that in 2012, black turnout increased overall, so did

black support for the Republican nominee, former Massachusetts Gov-ernor Mitt Romney. Black voters over 45 drove the increased turnoutsince youth turnout decreased—additional evidence of an emerging lineof demarcation between generations and their actualization of linkedfate. Further, in 2012, for the first time since 1980, a decrease in registered

black Independents resulted in an increase in blacks identifying as Re-publican. The relationship between black voters and the DemocraticParty therefore is primed for disruption, and a Republican candidatewith the right message may begin it in earnest, provided he or she un-derstands the intricacies of this latest evolution of linked fate.The late civil-rights icon Julian Bond once said, “I’m old enough to re-

member when the political parties competed for the votes of AfricanAmericans.” For a number of reasons, those days were long gone. But they are

due for a resurgence. A younger, diverse, more politically active blackelectorate is uninterested in having its voice muted by a blind adherenceto a partisan loyalty established before its birth. It realizes that the bestthing that can happen for African Americans politically is for politiciansto actively court the black vote.Whereas linked fate in the latter part of the 20th century meant polit-

ical solidarity with the Democratic Party, the 21st-century iteration re-quires political competition to prioritize black America’s concerns. And much like those young people who marched to obtain passage

of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, this new segment of the elec-torate will not simply bow out and go fishing—instead, they are willingto go to the mat.

CAN THE DEMOCRATICPARTY RETAIN ITS HOLDON BLACK VOTERS?(continued from page 1)

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 4 Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 5

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002294

In the matter of the name change of:ALIANA IZABELLA PHILLIPS By (Petitioner) LEEANNE SCHULZ

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: ALIANA IZABELLA PHILLIPSTo: ALIANA IZABELLA SCHULZBirth Certificate: ALIANA IZABELLAPHILLIPS

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON STEPHANIEROTHSTEIN ROOM 404 PLACE:901 N. 9th Street, Milwaukee, Wiscon-sin, 53233 DATE: MAY 19, 2016TIME: 9:30AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-29--2016BY THE COURT: STEPHANIE G.ROTHSTEIN Circuit Court Judge016-74/4-1-8-15-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002483

In the matter of the name change of:DAVID JOSEPH LLANAS By (Petitioner) DAVID JOSEPHLLANAS

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: DAVID JOSEPH LLANAS To:DUDE JOSEPH LLANASBirth Certificate: DAVID JOSEPHLLANAS

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON GLENN H.YAMAHIRO ROOM 402 PLACE: 901N. 9th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,53233 DATE: MAY 9, 2016 TIME:9:00AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-28--2016BY THE COURT: GLENN H.YAMAHIRO Circuit Court Judge016-73/4-1-8-15-2016

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYSMALL CLAIMS PUBLICATION

SUMMONS Case No. 16SC002924

To: RACHAEL MERCADO 3418 N.9TH ST. MILWAUKEE, WI 53206

You are being sued by the Plaintiff J.LUIS MERCADO in the Small ClaimsCourt for Milwaukee County, Milwau-kee County Courthouse Courtroom400, 901 N. Ninth St Milwaukee WI53233. A hearing will be held at 8:30A.M on 4/21/2016 before a SmallClaims Commissioner. If you do notappear, a judgment may be given tothe person suing you. A copy of theclaim has been mailed to the addressabove.

ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF-OR - PLAINTIFF: JOSE LUIS MER-CADO622 W. PIERCE ST. MILWAUKEE WI 53204(414) 552-0914Dated: 3-24-2016016-072/3-30-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV001914

In the matter of the name change of:YAJAIRA KITTY CORTEZ BRINBy (Petitioner) YAJAIRA KITTYCORTEZ BRIN

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: YAJAIRA KITTY CORTEZBRIN To: KITTY YAJAIRA CORTEZBRINBirth Certificate: YAJAIRA CORTEZ

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON GLENN H.YAMAHIRO ROOM 402, PLACE:901 N. 9th Street, Milwaukee, Wiscon-sin, 53233 DATE: APRIL 22 2016TIME: 9:30AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated 03-10-2016BY THE COURT:HON. GLENN H. YAMAHIRO Circuit Court Judge016-070/3-25/4-1-8-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT

FAMILY COURT BRANCHMILWAUKEE COUNTY

FAMILY: D-WSCase No. 09 FA 6366

In Re: the dissolved marriage ofCHEE J. LEE, F/K/A CHEE J. PLUS-TER, Petitioner and RespondentMARK J. PLUSTER To the person named above as re-spondent:You are hereby notified that the peti-tioner named above has filed a motionfor a change of venue against you,which is attached, stating the natureand basis of the legal action. You must appear to answer the claim.The motion will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin on Friday, April 8, 2016 at10:30 AM before the HonorableMichael J. Dwyer.

Within 20 days of receiving this notice,you must respond with a written an-swer, as that term is used in Ws. Stat.ch. 802, to the motion. The Court mayreject or disregard an answer thatdoes not follow the requirements ofthe statutes. The answer must besent or delivered t this Court, who ad-dress is Clerk Of Circuit Court Milwau-kee County Courthouse 901 North 9thStreet Milwaukee, WI 53233 and to At-torney Melissa A. Young of CordellLaw, LLP the petitioner’s attorney,whose address is 8040 ExcelsiorDrive, Ste. 403 Madison, WI 53703

You may have an attorney help or rep-resent you.If you do not appear at the hearing,the court may grant judgment againstyou for the award of money or otherlegal action requested in the petition,and you may lose your right to objectto anything that is or may be incorrectin the motion. A judgment may be en-forced as provided by law. A judgmentawarding money may become a lienagainst any real estate you own nowor in the future, and may also be en-forced by garnishment of wages orseizure of property.

You are further hereby notified of theavailability of information set forth inWis. Stat 767.105 from the office of

family court commissioner.

If you need help in this matter be-cause of a disability, please call (414)289-6660 at least (10) working daysprior to the scheduled court dateplease note that the Court does notprovide transportation.Dated: March 16, 2016Cordell Law, LLP Attorneys for the Petitioner By Melissa A, YoungState Bar No. 10918848040 Excelsior Drive, Ste 403Madison WI 53717 (608) 772-7896016-071/3-23-25/4-1-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002192

In the matter of the name change of:DAMARI LATRELL RETIC By (Petitioner) DAMARI LATRELLRETIC

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: DAMARI LATRELL RETIC To:DAMARI LASHAWN BROWNBirth Certificate: DAMARI LATRELLRETIC

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON DENNIS P. MO-RONEY ROOM 413, PLACE: 901 N.9th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,53233 DATE: APRIL 20, 2016 TIME:3:00PM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-18-2016BY THE COURT:HON. DENNIS P. MORONEYCircuit Court Judge016-069/3-25/4-1-8-16

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002232

In the matter of the name change of:YONG YANG By (Petitioner) YONG YANG

NOTICE IS GIVEN:

A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: YONG YANG To: MAXZHONE YOUNG Birth Certificate: YONG YANG

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON WILLIAM SOS-NAY ROOM 414 PLACE: 901 N. 9thStreet, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53233DATE: APRIL 19 2016 TIME: 2:00 PM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-18-2016BY THE COURT:HON. WILLIAM SOSNAYCircuit Court Judge016-068 3-25/4-1-8-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV001838

In the matter of the name change of:LAWRENCE GABRIEL PI-LOCZEWSKIBy (Petitioner) LAWRENCE GABRIELPILOCZEWSKI

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: LAWERENCE GABRIEL PI-LOCZEWSKI To: GABE LEONARDPILOBirth Certificate: LAWRENCEGABRIEL PILOCZEWSKI

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON TIMOTHY G.DUGAN BRANCH 10 ROOM 415,PLACE: 901 N. 9th Street, Milwaukee,Wisconsin, 53233 DATE: APRIL 14,2016 TIME: 9:00 AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-9-2016BY THE COURT:HON. TIMOTHY G. DUGAN Circuit Court Judge016-067 3-25/4-1-8-2016

LEGALSLEGALS

Place your Place your classifiedclassified , , legallegal , and/or , and/or public public noticenotice in YOUR in YOUR MILWAUKEE COMMUNITYMILWAUKEE COMMUNITYJOURNALJOURNAL! Call ! Call 265-5300265-5300!!

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 6SUMMONS

(PUBLICATION)STATE OF WISCONSIN

CIRCUIT COURTMILWAUKEE COUNTY

NOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002125

In the matter of the name change of:TYLER KEYONE WILSONBy (Petitioner) KONTESSAMONIQUE BLAYLOCK

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: TYLER KEYONE WILSONTo: TYLER KEYONE PENNBirth Certificate: TYLER KEYONEWILSON

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON RICHARD JSANKOVITZ PLACE: 901 N. 9thStreet, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53233DATE: APRIL 27 2016 TIME: 9:00 AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-17-2016BY THE COURT:HON. RICHARD J. SANKOVITZCircuit Court Judge016-066 3-25/4-1-8-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYWITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN

Case No. 16FA001114DIVORCE 40101

In re the marriage of: DREWNETTHURKES, 1925 N. 30TH ST. MIL-WAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53208, Peti-tioner and FREDDIE DUDLEY 3341N. 23RD ST. MILWAUKEE WI 53206,RESPONDENT

THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, to theperson named above as respondent:

You are notified that your spouse hasfiled a lawsuit or other legal actionagainst you. The Petition, which is at-tached, states the nature and basis ofthe legal action.

Within 20 days of receiving this Sum-mons, you must provide a written re-sponse, as that term is used in Ch.802, Wis. Stats., to the Petition. TheCourt may reject or disregard a re-sponse that does not follow the re-quirements of the statutes.

The response must be sent or deliv-ered to the following government of-fice: Clerk of Court Milwaukee County901 North 9th Street Milwaukee, Wis-consin 53233.

The response must also be mailed ordelivered within 20 days to the peti-tioner at the address above.

It is recommended, but not requiredthat you have an attorney help or rep-resent you

If you do not provide a proper re-sponse within 20 days, the court maygrant judgment against you and youmay lose your right to object to any-thing that is or may be incorrect in thePetition.

A judgment may be enforced as pro-vided by law. A Judgment may be-come a lien against any real estateyou own now or in the future and mayalso be enforced by garnishment orseizure of property.

Dated: 02-23-2016By: DREWNETT HURKES016-065/3-25/4-1-8-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FOR

NAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV002107

In the matter of the name change of:STEPHANIE NICOLE LYONBy (Petitioner) DANIELLE E. LYON

By (Co-Petitioner) NICHOLAS J.SCHWAN

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: STEPHANIE NICOLE LYONTo: STEPHANIE NICOLE SCHWAN Birth Certificate: STEPHANIENICOLE LYON

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON DAVIDBOROWSKI BRANCH 12 ROOM206, PLACE: 901 N. 9th Street, Mil-waukee, Wisconsin, 53233 DATE:APRIL 21 2016 TIME: 11:00AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-15-2016BY THE COURT DAVID BOROWSKICircuit Court Judge016-064/3-18-25/4-1-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSINCIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYNOTICE AND ORDER FORNAME CHANGE HEARINGCase No. 16CV001981

In the matter of the name change of:LEE ANDREWBy (Petitioner) LEE ANDREW

NOTICE IS GIVEN:A petition was filed asking to changethe name of the person listed above:From: LEE ANDREW NASH To: LEEANDREW TERRELLBirth Certificate: LEE ANDREWNASH

IT IS ORDERED:This petition will be heard in the CircuitCourt of Milwaukee County, State ofWisconsin.Judge’s Name: HON DENNIS P. MO-RONEY ROOM 413, PLACE: 901 N.

9th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,53233 DATE: APRIL 13, 2016 TIME:10:30AM

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:Notice of this hearing shall be given bypublication as a Class 3 notice forthree (3) weeks in a row prior to thedate of the hearing in the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal, a newspaperpublished in Milwaukee County, Stateof Wisconsin.Dated: 3-14-2016BY THE COURT DENNIS P. MO-RONEYCircuit Court Judge016-063/3-18-25/4-1-2016

SUMMONS(PUBLICATION)

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT

MILWAUKEE COUNTYDIVORCE-40101

Case No. 15FA007984

In Re: The marriage of SHARON D TAY-LOR, Petitioner and RespondentBARRY TAYLOR JR

THE STATE OF WISCONSIN, TO THEPERSON NAMED ABOVE AS RE-SPONDENTYou are notified that the petitionernamed above has filed a Petition for di-vorce or legal separation against you.

You must respond with a written de-mand for a copy of the Petition within 40days from the day after the first date ofpublication.

The demand must be sent or deliveredto the court at: Clerk of Court MilwaukeeCounty Courthouse 901 N. 9th St.ROOM 104 Milwaukee WI 53233and toSHARON TAYLOR 4436 N 71STSTREET Milwaukee WI 53218

It is recommended, but not required,that you have attorney help or representyou.

If you do not demand a copy of the Pe-tition within 45 days, the court may grantjudgment against you for the award ofmoney or other legal action requested inthe Petition and you may lose your rightto object anything that is or may be in-correct in the Petition.

A judgment may be enforced as pro-vided by law. A judgment awardingmoney may become a lien against anyreal estate you own now or in the future,and may also be enforced by garnish-ment or seizure of property.

You are further notified that if the partiesto this action have minor children, viola-tion of 948.31, Wis. Stats., (Interferencewith custody by parent or others) is pun-ishable by fines and/or imprisonment.If you and the petitioner have minor chil-dren, documents setting forth the per-centage standard for child supportestablished by the department under49.22(9), Wis. Stats., and the factorsthat a court may consider for modifica-tion of that standard under 767.511(1m),Wis. Stats., are available upon your re-quest from the Clerk of Court.

You are notified of the availability of in-formation from the Circuit Court Com-missioner as set forth in 767.105, Wis.Stats.

767.105 Information from Circuit CourtCommissioner.(2) Upon the request of a party to an ac-tion affecting the family, including a re-vision of judgment or order under sec.767.59 or 767.451:(a) The Circuit Court Commissionershall, with or without charge provide theparty with written information on the fol-lowing, as appropriate to the actioncommenced:1. The procedure for obtaining a judg-ment or order in the action.2. The major issues usually addressedin such an action.3. Community resources and familycourt counseling services available toassist the parties.4. The procedure for setting modifying,and enforcing child support awards, ormodifying and enforcing legal custody orphysical placement judgments or or-ders.(b) The Circuit Court Commissionershall provide a party, for inspection orpurchase with a copy of the statutoryprovisions in this chapter generally per-tinent to the action.Date: 3-8-2016By: SHARON TAYLOR016-059/3-18-25/4-1-2016

“Mister Speaker, I am proud that the Milwaukee Community Journal hails fromthe 4th Congressional District. It has consistently informed, analysed and entertained readers for nearly 38 years. Iam pleased to give praise to PatriciaO’Flynn Pattillo and her staff for providing avoice to the community and providing educational opportunities to students. Iwish them many more years of success.”--A segment from Cong. Gwen Moore’s remarks she made on the Congressional Record paying tribute to the MilwaukeeCommunity Journal’s Dr. Terence N. Thomas Scholarship Annual Brunch in 2014.

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 7

Special Weekend Edition/ELECTION WATCH 2016 April 1, 2016 Page 8