bus ethics- chap 10- social contracts & fatalism

Upload: rachlouis2010

Post on 09-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    1/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Business Ethics: Transcending

    Requirements through Moral

    Leadership

    -------

    Chapter 10 Social Contract and Fatalism

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    2/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    CHAPTER 10 - OVERALL AGENDA

    A. Introduction

    B. History of Social Contract

    C. Social Contract & MoralityD. Rousseaus General Will as the Standard

    E. Problems With Rousseaus General Will

    F. Fatalism, Free Will, and Determinism

    G. Summary

    H. Conclusion

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    3/20

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    4/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    History of Social Contract

    The Social Contract constitutes the means to the

    existence of society and morality.

    Rousseau argues that the historical reality is thatthe Social Contract does not exist.

    Those who live by it werent around to make it

    and agree to it.

    Therefore the Social Contract is an impliedcontract that serves to validate morality.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    5/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Rousseau & The State of Nature

    What would existence be like if people livedwithout governments, laws, and rules?

    Rousseau declares that people in such a NaturalState are characterized by sentiments ofcompassion rather than viciousness.

    Although people dont know the ideas of goodnessin this society they are not naturally wicked.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    6/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Why Do People Depart From The State

    Of Nature? Rousseau argues that people depart from the

    state of nature because they are social

    creatures that need:A. To Live in Groups.

    B. Interact with their Own Kind.

    C. Live a Good human life.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    7/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Social Contract & Morality

    Social living produces moral and then legalstandards for the whole community.

    Society cant exist without morality. The chance of the Good Life can only by

    reached within society governed bymorality.

    Morality can only be attained by the SocialContract of living in communities.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    8/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    General Will As Standard For

    Morality The body politic is a legal and ethical entity possessed

    of a will.

    The purpose of the General Will is to preserve the

    whole and achieve the common good.

    Participating in the Social Contract and the General

    Will, people share in the common good.

    Subjection to the Social Contract and Common Goodcauses people to submerge their individual wills for

    something greater.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    9/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Problems With General Will

    The General Will is non-determinable.

    What does the Common Good and General Will consist

    of?

    People do not prefer the Common Good or General Will

    over their own individual will.

    The General Will exists only for philosophers.

    If it did exist, it would be manipulated and exploited by a

    minority if it was put to a vote democratically.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    10/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Summary

    Rousseaus Theory presumes people are

    rational.

    People can agree to a consensus of rules fortheir mutual benefit.

    Agreements and rules agreed to by the

    people would be followed by all people.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    11/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Fatalism

    Moral goodness is present when moral responsibility is present.

    Free Will is a distinguishing feature of a moral person.

    Freedom is an indispensable element for morality.

    Science views people as actors whose behavior is caused byhereditary and environmental factors.

    Are peoples actions predetermined or do they have freedom to

    make choices?

    If peoples actions are predetermined are they morallyresponsible? Should they be blamed for wrongdoings or praised

    for goodness?

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    12/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Major Tenets of Fatalism

    Natural events are fixed absolutely.

    Human destiny is predetermined.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    13/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Consequences of Fatalism

    Consequences of Fatalism

    No freedom anywhere.

    Freedom is an impossibility.

    There is only unbending necessity.

    Views of Fatalism

    Stoics claim there is nothing a person can do to change their fate.

    Sophists believe people could shape their fate.

    Machiavelli states the people can seize opportunities to master

    ones fate.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    14/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Criticism Of Fatalism

    People have free will and their lives are not

    predetermined.

    Morality demands free will and anopportunity for choice.

    Kant argues that humans stand alone among

    the animals because they have free will andare capable of reason.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    15/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Free Will

    The Experience and feelings of freedom.

    Morality presupposes free choice.

    The dual nature of human beings:

    A. Humans Reflect on Experiences.

    B. Humans Have Laws and are Free.C. Beings Subject to Natural Laws.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    16/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Determinism

    Determinism holds that everything in the universe

    is determined by causes.

    That is for every event, there is a prior set ofcircumstances that occurred.

    Nothing happens by chance. Everything that

    occurs is the only thing that could have occurred

    due to prior circumstances. What occurs must occur.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    17/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Two Types of Determinism

    Hard Determinism A persons heredity,

    history, and environment cause a person to

    act in a certain way.

    Soft Determinism A persons will is free

    in that it is uncaused.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    18/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Summary

    Human choices are neither fixed by fate nor by antecedent causes.

    Hard Determinism supposes that human actions are fixed eternally,

    regardless of what one does.

    Human choices are not absolutely open and free will is not limitlessly free.

    Actions are free only within certain bounds amid the possibilities

    presented by certain sets of conditions.

    People recognize they are influenced by outside factors other than their

    own thoughts and beings.

    Certain impacts can change ones character and cause them to ask Why?

    Ones vital moral and intellectual interests demand a more liberal

    philosophy and these interests should make the Fateful choice.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    19/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Conclusion

    There is not one theory that accurately defines ethics andmorals for a society. Rousseau assumes people are rationaland can agree to a set of rules for their mutual benefit. As

    we know this is not always the case.

    Humans have choices and there are many factors thatdetermine the selection of one choice over another.Choices are not predetermined nor are they absolutely

    open ended with unlimited options.

  • 8/8/2019 Bus Ethics- Chap 10- Social Contracts & Fatalism

    20/20

    Cavico & Mujtaba, 2005

    Reference

    Cavico, F. & Mujtaba, B., (2005). Business Ethics: Transcending Requirements

    through Moral Leadership. Pearson Custom Publications. U.S.A. ISBN: 0-

    536-85783-0. Address: 75 Arlington Street, Suite 300. Boston Mass, 02116.

    Phone: (800) 374-1200. Or: (800) 922-0579.