by bob schultheis natural resource engineering specialist
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Impacts of an Ethanol Plant in the Missouri Ozarks for 2007 NACAA AM/PIC Grand Rapids, MI July 17, 2007. by Bob Schultheis Natural Resource Engineering Specialist. Why the Rush for Ethanol?. $3 per gallon gasoline Demand for greater energy security - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Environmental Impacts ofan Ethanol Plant in the
Missouri Ozarksfor
2007 NACAA AM/PICGrand Rapids, MI
July 17, 2007
byBob Schultheis
Natural Resource Engineering Specialist
2
Why the Rush for Ethanol?
$3 per gallon gasoline Demand for greater energy security Concern over relying on oil imports from
politically volatile regions– Those opposing ethanol are branded as
“unpatriotic” or “supporting terrorism” Growing worries about CO2 contributing to
“global warming”– Methane & nitrogen oxides (NOx) are much
bigger contributors Income for grain farmers & petroleum
companies
3
Basics of Ethanol Production
Ethanol is an alcohol made by fermenting grain and other carbohydrates
This is an old process which traditionally has been used to produce ethanol for use as a beverage
97% of U.S. ethanolis made from corn
4
Ethanol Conversion Factors
Corn – dry mill = 2.75 gallons/bu = 98.21 gal/ton(4.2 T/ac. = 150 bu./ac. = 410 gal./ac.)
Corn – wet mill = 2.65 gallons/bu = 94.64 gal/ton Grain sorghum = 2.70 gallons/bu = 96.43 gal/ton Wheat = 2.80 gallons/bu = 93.33 gal/ton Barley = 1.40 gallons/bu = 58.33 gal/ton Sugarcane = 19.50 gal/ton
(35 T/ac. = 680 gal./ac.)
Sugar beets = 24.80 gal/ton Molasses = 69.40 gal/ton Raw sugar = 135.40 gal/ton Refined sugar = 141.00 gal/ton
5
Corn Starch Ethanol HFCS
Germ
Corn Gluten MealGerm Meal
Corn Germ Meal
Gluten
Bran
Steepwater solubles
Corn Gluten Feed
Corn Oil
Wet Milling Process
6
Dry Milling Process
CornEthanolStillage
Thin Stillage
Wet Distillers Grain Condensed
Distillers Solubles
Wet Distillers Grain with Solubles
A bushel of corn will produce ~2.75 gallons of Ethanol, 17 lbs of CO2 and 17 lbs of DDGSDDGS
7
8
Environmental Considerationsof Ethanol Production 1
More acreage being put into corn– Marginal land has lower yields & generally has
higher erosion rates Sediment concern in water ways Nitrogen use for corn production
– Marginal ground doesn’t utilize fertilizer as well causing higher potential for nutrient runoff and leaching
– U.S. nitrogen sources = Russia, Trinidad & Tobago– Made from foreign oil & natural gas
9
Environmental Considerationsof Ethanol Production 2
Atrazine runoff concerns– Whether in water or attached to soil, atrazine use
for weed control has higher potential to runoff into water bodies
– If not wisely managed in targeted watersheds,it may be banned in all watersheds
Water demand– Growing the corn = 1450 gallons per 1 gal. ethanol
(600,000 gal./ac./season ÷ 150 bu./ac. ÷ 2.75 gal./bu.)
– Making ethanol = 3-5 gallons per 1 gal. ethanol Air emissions of the ethanol plants
10
Environmental Considerationsof Ethanol Production 3
High P, K and S content of DDGs as feed Ethanol cannot be transported by pipeline
– Truck fuel use & air emissions to transport it Underwriters Laboratories (UL) has not
issued safety approval for E85 pumps Is U.S. ethanol
replacing foreign oilor domestic oil?
11
Economic Considerationsof Ethanol Production
$.51/gallon federal excise tax credit– 5.1 cents/gallon for 10% blend– Government tax incentives used since 1978 to
make ethanol competitive with gasoline
$.54/gallon federal tariff on imported ethanol States may also offer incentives
– Missouri = $.20/gallon producertax credit on first 12.5 milliongallons
12
Economic Considerationsof Ethanol Use
E10 = negligible MPG loss– 3% less energy per gallon than gasoline +
2.5 points higher octane rating E85 = 15-20% MPG loss, depending on
driving habits and terrain– 27% less energy per gallon than gasoline +
13 points higher octane rating Only select vehicles can burn E85
– Flex-Fuel Vehicles or FFVs built mostly after 1999 – Corrosion-resistant stainless steel gas tanks and
Teflon-lined fuel lines
13
U.S. Gasoline Usage, 1986-06
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1601986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Billion G
allons
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
14
Ethanol Production, 1980-06
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.01980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Bill
ion G
allo
ns
Source: Renewable Fuels Association
15
Gas & Ethanol Production, 1986-06
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1601986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Billion G
allons
ethanol gasoline
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration
16
U.S. Gasoline Usage
Mandating 10% ethanol in all gasoline would require that nearly half of the U.S. corn crop be processed into ethanol
If all U.S. corn were made into ethanol, it would produce 31 billion gallons per year
To replace all U.S. gasoline would require78.6 billion bushels of corn annually
Source: FAPRI 2006
17
Webster CountyGroundwater Impact Committee
(Appointed 8/23/06 by County Commission, dissolved 11/18/06)
Bob Schultheis - Natural resource engineering specialistMarshfield, MO (Committee Chair)
Larry Alberty - Fordland area businessmanFordland, MO
Karen Asher - Seymour area farmerSeymour, MO
Joe Blaine - Soil scientistSeymour, MO
Joyce Noland - District technician, Webster County SWCDMarshfield, MO
18
Proposed Gulfstream Bioflex Energy ethanol
plant site is in James River Basin Watershed of southwest Missouri
Map source: www.dnr.mo.gov/env/wpp/watersheds/info/ws-11010002.htm
19
Equivalent Residential Demand
880 GPM water = 21,000 persons @ 60 GPD
10,000 KwH = 5,100 houses @ 1400 KwH per month
20
Webster County Demographics
7th fastest growing in population in Missouri– 35,500+ people in 2006
12th lowest (out of 114 counties) in per capita income
Pasture-based livestock production– 2nd in Missouri for dairy cows– 5th in Missouri for hay production
Almost no grain production No planning and zoning regulations Second-highest elevation in the state Residents rely entirely on drilled wells for water
– Groundwater recharged by precipitation
21
Geology of Missouri
22
Geology of SW Missouri
23
Geology ofWebsterCounty
“Top of the Ozarks”
Starting point for 5 rivers in
Missouri
1495 ft.
1525 ft.
1675 ft.
Marshfield
Rogersville
Seymour
24
Geology of Ethanol Plant Site
25
Karst Regions of the U.S.
26
Pollution Risk Areas
27
28“Losing streams” leak water underground in unpredictable directions with little or no filtering
29Sinkholes are direct conduits forsurface water to travel underground
30
Solution Channel
31
Proposed site: NE¼ of Section 15, Township 28N, Range 19W in Webster County, MO
32Soils are wet-natured due to a restrictive layer approximately two feet below the surface.
33
Gulfstream Bioflex Energy, LLC
New corporation located in Mt. Vernon, MO Privately owned; not a farmer cooperative One of partners is in the petroleum trucking
business No previous experience with ethanol Building contractor expertise is community
buildings & Branson theaters First engineering firm quit because they were
not getting paid Conflicting information from the partners
34
35
36
GBE Reasons for Site Selection
Yes– Lay of the land– Proximity to a natural gas pipeline– Easy access to railroad & four-lane highway– Can ship corn cheaper than shipping ethanol– 90% of grain arrive by rail, 10% by truck
No– Large livestock industry in southern Missouri– “Planning and zoning never came to mind”
37
GBE Ethanol Plant Estimates 1
Inputs 194 rail cars per week (data from GBE) 3,500 bushels per rail car 2.70 gallons of ethanol per bushel 4.84 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol 17.0 pounds of DDGs per bushel of grain 24 hours per day of operations 50 weeks of operation per year10,000 KwH electrical demand, if no gas used
(data from GBE)
38
GBE Ethanol Plant Estimates 2
Outputs 97,000 bushels of grain processed per day
825 tons of DDGs produced per day
261,900 GPD of ethanol produced
1,833,300 gallons of ethanol produced per week (data from GBE)
76 rail cars per week @ 24,000 gal. each
1,267,600 GPD of water required per day
880 GPM of water (data from GBE)
47 acre-inches of water per day (if irrigated)
39
Water Law in Missouri
Riparian water doctrine– Landowners are allowed to take all the water they
want as long as they leave a reasonable amount for everyone else
– “Reasonable” is determined by decision of lawsuit filed in circuit court
“Citizens for Groundwater Protection” sued to stop GBE– Circuit court ruled in favor of GBE– Case is currently being appealed
40
Possible well locations to give2000-foot separation distance
41
42
43
Static water table
High-capacity well
Existing wellsInitial cone of depression
Cone of depression
Long-term cone of depression
44
What Happens to Discharge Water?
Unclear from GBE how much water will be discharged
880 GPM = 47 acre-inches per day Soils will hold total of 3.5-5.0 inches of water Annual precipitation and evaporation are
nearly equal Rest must be discharged to drainage-ways or
irrigated How much will recycling concentrate the
discharge water? What’s in it?
45
Equivalent Conversions
880 GPM water = 21,000 persons @ 60 GPD = 3,520-unit housing development @ 6 people per house = 808 acres @ 10,000 sq.ft. per lot
10,000 KwH = 5,100 houses @ 1,400 KwH per month
825 tons DDGs/day = 550,000 head of cattle @ 3 lbs. fed per day = 3,790 acres of feedlot @ 300 sq.ft. per animal
46
Other Considerations
Noise from hammermills & dryers Light pollution Odor Air emissions
– EPA rule change on 4/12/07 increased allowable levels from 100 tons/year to 250 tons/year)
Safety from explosion and fire Traffic on Highway 60 and railroad
47Property is in two school districts
and two fire districts
48Predominant wind direction for
April-September is from SSE to NNW
49
Will the Jobs Help the County?
200-300 outside workers during construction 35-45 employees @$35,000+/year
= $2.1 million annual payroll– Rail car loading/unloading– Scale operators for weighing trucks– Laboratory personnel– Clerical workers
Will all employees live in Webster Countyand buy here?
No revenue to county government due to 11/05 property tax levy rollback for sales tax
50
Summary – Big Picture Questions
Is ethanol from corn sustainable? Does it reduce energy needs from
foreign sources? Would the site pass an environmental
impact study? Are natural resources
available to support a plantwithout damaging others?
Can the plant be convertedto cellulosic ethanol?
51
For More Information, Contact:
Click on Ethanol Plant Development link atwww.jrbp.missouristate.edu
Paul IpockWebster County Presiding Commissioner
Courthouse, 1st FloorMarshfield, MO 65706
417-859-4250 (Mondays or Tuesdays) 417-859-2223 (County Clerk)
52
Questions???
Robert A. (Bob) SchultheisNatural Resource Engineering Specialist
Webster County Extension Center800 S. Marshall St.
Marshfield, MO 65706Voice: 417-859-2044 Fax: 417-468-2086
E-mail: [email protected]: extension.missouri.edu/webster