c2 c anaysis nov 11
TRANSCRIPT
part of Aker
© 2012 Aker Solutions
Campus to Corporate(C2C)Analysis of C2C trainings NOV-11
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 2
Objective of Analysis
■ Objective- To get accurate feedback from APG employees on C2C programs.
■ To know whether C2C trainings imparted to employees/trainees are really helping them in grooming their personalities in corporate & giving them good exposure.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 3
AnalysisAnalysis
■ Analysis is based on the C2C feedback forms filled by employees themselves in the month of Analysis is based on the C2C feedback forms filled by employees themselves in the month of November & December 2011.November & December 2011.
■ Analysis is done in Analysis is done in Quantitative & Qualitative waysQuantitative & Qualitative ways..
■ Quantitative analysis is evaluated on the parameters like Quantitative analysis is evaluated on the parameters like Knowledge & Skills (KS), Course Knowledge & Skills (KS), Course design & Trainer.design & Trainer.
■ Qualitative analysis is based on the parameters like Qualitative analysis is based on the parameters like recommendations, Suggestions, likes & recommendations, Suggestions, likes & dislikes about the program.dislikes about the program.
■ Overall Analysis is also done on whether objectives for each training program are met?, are Overall Analysis is also done on whether objectives for each training program are met?, are employees satisfied with the trainings given to them & are they helpful for career development.employees satisfied with the trainings given to them & are they helpful for career development.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 4
QuantitativeQuantitative AnalysisAnalysis
Graph ScaleGraph Scale RatingsRatings
ExcellentExcellent 55
GoodGood 44
ModerateModerate 33
Needs an ImprovementNeeds an Improvement 22
PoorPoor 11
Graphical Scale for quantitative analysis is as follows :-
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 5
Knowledge & skills
4
3.63
4.36
3.78
4.24
Journey throughProcess Engineeringworld
Pressure & LevelInstruments
Air compressors
Plot Plans & Layouts
Electrical Infrastructure& Distribution
All the training programs in Nov 2011 for campus to corporate found GOOD on the basis of knowledge and skills parameter except for Pressure -level instruments & plot, plans & instruments these two programs were found on MODERATE level.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 6
Course Content
3.9
3.64
4.22
3.7
4.28
Journey through ProcessEngineering world
Pressure & LevelInstruments
Air compressors
Plot Plans & Layouts
Electrical Infrastructure &Distribution
On the basis of course content 3 of the training programs were MODERATE which are journey through engineering world , pressure- level instruments & plot, plans & layouts. Whereas other 2 training programs were GOOD in course content.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 7
Trainer
3.9
3.64
4.29
3.78
4.29
Journey throughProcess Engineeringworld
Pressure & LevelInstruments
Air compressors
Plot Plans & Layouts
Electrical Infrastructure& Distribution
On the basis of Trainer 3 of the training programs were MODERATE which are journey through engineering world , pressure- level instruments & plot, plans & layouts. Whereas other 2 training programs were GOOD..
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 8
Qualitative Analysis
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 9
Analysis on likes about the program
4 1 1 1
21 26
1023 22
73
12
8 4
3 3 5 4 6
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Air compressors ElectricalInfrastructure &
Distribution
Journey throughProcess
Engineeringw orld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure &Level
Instruments
knowledge no reply Presentation Speaker,Practical & Interactive
Limitation – approx 85% of the trainees did not respond to this question
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 10
Analysis on dislikes about the programAnalysis on dislikes about the program
.
57 7
3526 23 28
33
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Air compressors ElectricalInfrastructure &
Distribution
Journey throughProcess
Engineeringw orld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure &Level
Instruments
deviated from subject lengthy no reply
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 11
Analysis on recommendations about programsAnalysis on recommendations about programs
21 3 2 1 13 1
31 30 26 34 29
0%
20%
40%60%
80%
100%
Air compressors ElectricalInfrastructure &
Distribution
Journey throughProcess
Engineeringw orld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure & LevelInstruments
breaks needed needs to be informative needs to be practical no reply
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 12
Objectives met?Objectives met?
26 2226 33 29
21
17 10
1 2 4
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Aircompressors
ElectricalInfrastructure& Distribution
JourneythroughProcess
Engineeringworld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure &Level
Instruments
agree Disagree Moderate
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 13
Satisfied with training programs?Satisfied with training programs?
23 23
26 3227
4 1
128 9
1 3 4
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Aircompressors
ElectricalInfrastructure &
Distribution
Journey throughProcess
Engineeringw orld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure &Level
Instruments
agree Disagree Moderate
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 14
Helpful in career development?Helpful in career development?
25 2426 32 28
3 2
117 7
1 3 4
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Air compressors ElectricalInfrastructure &
Distribution
Journey throughProcess
Engineeringworld
Plot Plans &Layouts
Pressure & LevelInstruments
agree Disagree Moderate
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 15
Comments
■ Journey through process engineering world trainees liked presentation, speaker it was interactive too but trainees needed it to be more informative.
■ Pressure and level instruments training found to be very presentable, quality of presentation seems to be good, presenter had in depth knowledge about the subject what employees needed more was they need it to be more practical like case studies and all.
■ Air compressor again trainees liked the way it was presented, well structured with good time management. session was quiet interactive and trainees were impressed by trainer.
■ Plot, plants & layouts trainees liked this session because of audience – presenter equal participation that means it seems to be v interactive session.
■ Electrical infrastructure & distribution trainees happy with the presentation but slightly trainees were dissatisfied because they wanted mathematical interpretation for the presentation.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 16
conclusion
■ Trainings should be more informative
■ Trainings should be interactive.
■ Trainings should be more practical in terms of case studies, mathematical interpretation & etc.
■ Approx 90% of trainees found that overall objectives for the trainings were met, they were ready to suggest such training to others and they agree that it will be helpful for their career development.
© 2012 Aker Solutions part of AkerDate Month 2012
C2C Anaysis Nov-2011
Slide 17
Thank You