california farmland conversion report …...california farmland conversion report 2008-2010 april...
TRANSCRIPT
CALIFORNIA FARMLAND CONVERSION REPORT 2008-2010
April 2014 Documenting changes in agricultural land use since 1984.
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor
John Laird, Secretary, Natural Resources Agency
Mark Nechodom, Director, Department of Conservation
California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection (DLRP)
Our Mission: The Department of Conservation balances today's needs with tomorrow's challenges and fosters intelligent, sustainable, and efficient use of California's energy, land, and mineral resources. DLRP’s goal is to lead the change in the value proposition for the conservation of agricultural and open space land in California.
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP)
The Program:
The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program provides consistent, timely, and accurate land use data for assessing present status, reviewing trends, and planning for the future of California’s agricultural land resources.
For further information, please contact:
California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program 801 K Street, MS 18-01 Sacramento, CA 95814-3528 (916) 324-0850 FAX (916) 327-3430 TDD (916) 324-2555
email: [email protected] www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/fmmp
Photo Credits
Front Cover: Oaks and vineyard along levee, Yolo County (Photo by Molly Penberth) Figure 9: Vineyard Expansion in the Sierra Foothills (Photo by Troy Dick) Figure 12: New Dairy Facilities in Kings County (Aerial image by the National Agriculture Imagery Program) Back Cover: Northern, central, and southern regional views of California’s agricultural diversity, top to bottom: Whipple and Plank Ranch, Scott Valley, Siskiyou County (Photo by Larelle Burkham-Greydanus) Galeazzi Farm walnut orchard, Lockeford, San Joaquin County (Photo by Molly Penberth) The Flower Fields, Carlsbad, San Diego County (Photo by Molly Penberth) The Whipple and Plank Ranch and Galeazzi Farm properties are protected in perpetuity by agricultural land conservation easements funded in part by the Department of Conservation’s California Farmland Conservancy Program. Funding for these projects was derived from California Bond Propositions 40 and 84.
© 2014, California Department of Conservation
All rights reserved. Fair use of this report for a non-commercial, educational, research, or scientific purpose is not a violation of copyright. However, no part of the contents of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, or distributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose without the express written permission of the Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008 – 2010
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCE PROTECTION
FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM
APRIL 2014
Acknowledgements
MANY INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS REPORT AND THE GIS DATA FROM WHICH IT WAS DERIVED.
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Staff
Molly Penberth, Manager Troy Dick Karen FitzGerald* Patrick Hennessy Kerri Kisko Michael Kisko Amy Klug* Judith Santillan*
*Until March 2012. Thanks also to all past FMMP staff members for their cumulative contributions.
Division of Land Resource Protection
John Lowrie, Assistant Director David Thesell, Deputy Chief Monica Cea, Administrative Liaison
Principal Data Sources include digital soil survey data, produced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service; with aerial imagery from the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP), Google Maps, and Google Streetview.
Cultural base information for the Important Farmland Maps was derived from public domain data sets, based upon design of the U.S. Geological Survey, with updates generated by digitizing over current imagery.
Additional data on land management and land use conversion activity was made available from the U.S. Forest Service, California Department of Transportation, the California Energy Commission, and CalRecycle. GIS data posted at county and city websites proved valuable in many locations.
Map reviewer comments contributed substantially to improving the quality of the information. These reviewers include county and city planning offices, county agricultural commissioners, resource conservation districts, Natural Resources Conservation Service district conservationists, California Farm Bureau Federation, University of California Cooperative Extension, California Cattlemen's Association, local water and irrigation districts, public interest groups, and building industry representatives. Many of these groups also participated in development of the Farmland of Local Importance definitions for their respective counties.
This page left intentionally blank.
Executive Summary, 2008-2010 ............................................................................................................... 1 1 The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program ................................................... 5 Important Farmland Map Categories ............................................................................. 6 2 2010 Improvements and Challenges ........................................................................... 9 3 Understanding the Data ............................................................................................... 11 4 Land Use Conversion, 2008-2010 ............................................................................. 13 Urbanization ..................................................................................................................... 14 Other Changes Affecting Agricultural Land ............................................................... 18 Counties with Rural Land Mapping Enhancements .................................................... 23 Net Irrigated Farmland Change ................................................................................... 24 1984-2010 Net Land Use Change .............................................................................. 26 APPENDIX A 2008-2010 County Conversion Tables .................................................................... 28 APPENDIX B 2008 and 2010 County Acreage Tallies .................................................................. 76 APPENDIX C County and Regional Conversion Summaries ....................................................... 80 APPENDIX D Rural Land Use Mapping Tables ................................................................................ 84 APPENDIX E Farmland of Local Importance Definitions .............................................................. 96
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008 – 2010
Table of Contents
FIGURES Figure 1 Urbanization in the Bakersfield Area, Kern County, 1988-2010 .................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 2010 Important Farmland Survey Area ................................. 7 Figure 3 California Important Farmland Finder Example,
Buffered Polygon and Acreage ............................................... 9 Figure 4 Conversion Table Structure .................................................... 11 Figure 5 Regions Used for FMMP Analysis ......................................... 12 Figure 6 Statewide Important Farmland Conversion Summary ...... 13 Figure 7 Sources of Urban Land 2008-2010 .................................... 17 Figure 8 Conversions to Irrigated Farmland 2008-2010 ................ 18 Figure 9 Vineyard Expansion in the Sierra Foothills, Stanislaus County ..................................................................... 19 Figure 10 Conversions Out of Irrigated Categories 2008-2010 ..... 20 Figure 11 Land Reclassified from Irrigated to Dryland Farming
Categories, Western Fresno County .................................... 21 Figure 12 New Dairy Facilities in Kings County ................................... 23 Figure 13 Net Change in Urban Land, Irrigated Farmland,
and Dryland Agriculture 1984-2010 .................................. 27 TABLES Table 1 County Urbanization Ranks, Urbanization
from All Categories ................................................................. 14 Table 2 Regional Urbanization Ranking, Urbanization from All Categories......................................... 14 Table 3 California Farmland Conversion Summary 2008-2010 .. 15 Table 4 Irrigated Farmland to Urban Ranks .................................... 16 Table 5 Decreases of Irrigated Land Ranks, Net Losses of Irrigated Land ......................................................... 24 Table 6 Increases of Irrigated Land Ranks, Net Increases of Irrigated Land .................................................... 25 Table 7 Net Important Farmland Conversion 1984-2010 ............. 26
Appendix A: 2008-2010 County Conversion Tables Table A-1 Alameda ............. ............................ ............................ ............... 29 Table A-2 Amador ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 30 Table A-3 Butte ..................... ............................ ............................ ............... 31 Table A-4 Colusa .................. ............................ ............................ ............... 32 Table A-5 Contra Costa ...... ............................ ............................ ............... 33 Table A-6 El Dorado............ ............................ ............................ ............... 34 Table A-7 Fresno .................. ............................ ............................ ............... 35 Table A-8 Glenn ................... ............................ ............................ ............... 36 Table A-9 Imperial ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 37 Table A-10 Kern ..................... ............................ ............................ ............... 38 Table A-11 Kings .................... ............................ ............................ ............... 39 Table A-12 Lake ..................... ............................ ............................ ............... 40 Lassen (see Sierra Valley) ........... ............................ ............... 65 Table A-13 Los Angeles ........ ............................ ............................ ............... 41 Table A-14 Madera ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 42 Table A-15 Marin ................... ............................ ............................ ............... 43 Table A-16 Mariposa ............ ............................ ............................ ............... 44 Table A-17 Mendocino .......... ............................ ............................ ............... 45 Table A-18 Merced ................ ............................ ............................ ............... 46 Table A-19 Modoc ................. ............................ ............................ ............... 47 Table A-20 Monterey ............ ............................ ............................ ............... 48 Table A-21 Napa ................... ............................ ............................ ............... 49 Table A-22 Nevada ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 50 Table A-23 Orange ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 51 Table A-24 Placer .................. ............................ ............................ ............... 52 Plumas (see Sierra Valley) .......... ............................ ............... 65 Table A-25 Riverside ............. ............................ ............................ ............... 53 Table A-26 Sacramento ....... ............................ ............................ ............... 54 Table A-27 San Benito........... ............................ ............................ ............... 55 Table A-28 San Bernardino .............................. ............................ ............... 56 Table A-29 San Diego ........... ............................ ............................ ............... 57 Table A-30 San Joaquin ........ ............................ ............................ ............... 58 Table A-31 San Luis Obispo ............................. ............................ ............... 59 Table A-32 San Mateo .......... ............................ ............................ ............... 60 Table A-33 Santa Barbara .............................. ............................ ............... 61 Table A-34 Santa Clara ........ ............................ ............................ ............... 62 Table A-35 Santa Cruz .......... ............................ ............................ ............... 63 Table A-36 Shasta .................. ............................ ............................ ............... 64 Table A-37 Sierra Valley (Lassen/Plumas/Sierra) .................. ............... 65 Table A-38 Siskiyou ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 66 Table A-39 Solano ................. ............................ ............................ ............... 67 Table A-40 Sonoma ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 68 Table A-41 Stanislaus ............ ............................ ............................ ............... 69 Table A-42 Sutter ................... ............................ ............................ ............... 70 Table A-43 Tehama ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 71 Table A-44 Tulare .................. ............................ ............................ ............... 72 Table A-45 Ventura ............... ............................ ............................ ............... 73 Table A-46 Yolo ...................... ............................ ............................ ............... 74 Table A-47 Yuba .................... ............................ ............................ ............... 75
Appendix B: 2008 and 2010 County Acreage Tallies Table B-1 Important Farmland Acreage Summary 2008 ... ............... 77 Table B-2 Important Farmland Acreage Summary 2010 .... ............... 78
Table B-3 Important Farmland Acreage Summary, By Region, 2010 ....................................................... ............... 79
Appendix C: County and Regional Conversion Summaries
Table C-1 Sources of Urban Land 2008-2010 and Land Committed to Nonagricultural Use .............. ............... 81
Table C-2 Irrigated Farmland Changes 2008-2010 ........... ............... 82 Table C-3 Net Change in Irrigated Land 2008-2010 ......... ............... 83 Appendix D: Rural Land Use Mapping Tables
Table D-1 Rural Land Use Conversion Summary .................... ............... 85 Table D-2 Rural Land Mapping Changes 2008-2010 ......... ............... 86 Table D-3 Fresno .......................................................................... ............... 87 Table D-4 Kern ............................................................................. ............... 88 Table D-5 Kings ............................................................................ ............... 89 Table D-6 Madera ....................................................................... ............... 90
Table D-7 Mendocino .................................................................. ............... 91 Table D-8 Merced ........................................................................ ............... 92 Table D-9 San Joaquin ................................................................ ............... 93 Table D-10 Stanislaus .................................................................... ............... 94 Table D-11 Tulare .......................................................................... ............... 95
This page left intentionally blank.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 1
2010 URBANIZATION: 44,504 ACRES
39 PERCENT LOWER THAN IN 2008
25 PERCENT WAS FROM IRRIGATED FARMLAND AND 30 PERCENT FROM DRYLAND AGRICULTURE
44 PERCENT WAS IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 34 PERCENT IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
Executive Summary, 2008-2010
URBANIZATION DECREASED SHARPLY, AND IRRIGATED FARMLAND LOSSES WERE LOWER THAN THE RECORD 2008 LEVELS. LAND IDLING IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WAS THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO FARMLAND CONVERSION.
Irrigated farmland in California decreased by nearly 263 square miles (168,039 acres) between 2008 and 2010 as documented by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). The highest-quality agricultural soils, known as Prime Farmland, comprised 61 percent of the loss (102,554 acres). Urban development, which totaled 44,504 acres, decreased by 39 percent relative to the 2006-08 period. The 2010 urban land increase was the lowest recorded in the program’s history, reflecting impacts of the recent recession.
The FMMP biennial mapping survey covers approximately 98 percent of the privately owned land in the state (49.1 million acres) in 49 counties. Land use information is gathered using aerial imagery and land management data, which is combined with soil quality data in a geographic information system (GIS) to produce maps and statistics. The earliest data for most counties is from 1984.
Urban Development
Of the nearly 70 square miles of new Urban and Built-up land in the state, 44 percent occurred in the Southern California region (19,702 acres). Five out of the top ten urbanizing counties were in Southern California. Riverside County accounted for 13 percent of the state total (5,874 acres). San Diego and Los Angeles each added more than 4,000 acres to their urban totals. The San Joaquin Valley comprised 34 percent of statewide urban increases (15,132 acres). The urban footprints of Kern, Kings, and Fresno counties each expanded by 3,000 acres or more. The San Francisco Bay and Sacramento Valley regions were in third and fourth ranks in terms of urbanization, at 3,735 and 2,973 acres, respectively.
Statewide, irrigated farmland was the source of 11,104 acres or 25 percent of all new urban land. Prime Farmland was impacted at more than twice the rate of lesser quality soils (7,807 acres and 3,297 acres, respectively). Another 30 percent of new urban land came from dryland farming and grazing uses, some of which may have been idled in anticipation of development. The remaining 45 percent was derived from
natural vegetation or vacant lands.
Keeping with historic precedent, the San Joaquin Valley region had the largest proportion of direct irrigated land to urban land conversion (47 percent of its total urban increase). Kern and Tulare counties led in farmland urbanization, at more than 1,600 acres each. Direct irrigated farmland to urban conversions comprised 25 percent of total new urban for both the Sacramento Valley and San Joaquin Valley regions.
Housing and commercial development projects were significantly scaled back in size compared with prior mapping cycles. The largest single development statewide, at about 190 acres, was the Sun City Shadow Hills community in Indio (Riverside County). Community infrastructure such as water control, waste, and energy facilities also expanded. Examples
California Department of Conservation
Page 2
2010 IRRIGATED LAND TRENDS
LAND IDLING FOCUSED ON SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AND DELTA COUNTIES
NEW IRRIGATED LANDS WERE MOST COMMON IN THE SIERRA FOOTHILLS OF THE NORTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
ALMONDS, VINEYARDS, OLIVES, AND ROW CROPS WERE THE PREDOMINANT NEW USES
included a single water treatment facility covering 400 acres near Lancaster (Los Angeles County), more than 3,500 acres of water recharge basins in the southern San Joaquin Valley, and a number of small scale renewable energy and landfill facilities in Southern California and the San Joaquin Valley. Federal prison construction in Fresno County added 135 acres to the urban totals.
Agricultural Trends
While urbanization is an important component of agricultural land conversion, economic and resource availability factors also lead to more intensive farming or cessation of land from irrigated uses. Conversion from grasslands to orchards, primarily almonds, was the most widespread form of intensification in 2010. New almonds, vineyards, and row crop plantings were centered in the Sierra foothills of the northern San Joaquin Valley, resulting in expansions of irrigated farmland exceeding 5,000 acres in each of the counties ranging from San Joaquin in the north to Fresno in the south. The Sacramento Valley region was more noted for conversions to high density olive orchards, while vineyards were the primary reason for central coast irrigated land expansions. Riverside County was the only county in the Southern California area with notable new irrigated land acreage, mostly in the form of nurseries and vineyards. Sixty-eight percent of the land brought into irrigated uses in 2010 did not meet Prime Farmland criteria.
Land was removed from irrigated categories—to uses aside from urban—at a rate 3 percent lower than the prior update (260,412 acres in 2008 and 252,473 acres in 2010). Land idling and reversion to dry farming were responsible for more than 84 percent of this type of conversion. The remaining 16 percent were conversions to Other Land, which includes miscellaneous uses such as wetland restoration, aggregate mining, abandoned development projects, and rural residences.
The southern San Joaquin Valley and counties in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta were most impacted by land idling. Five counties had 10,000 or more acres of this conversion type: Fresno, Kings, Kern, Sacramento, and San Joaquin. Fresno County’s reclassification of more than 34,000 acres led all counties. Most of the conversions occurred on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley in association with ongoing drought and salinity related land retirement. Since 2006, water deliveries to federal and state water districts decreased to between 35 percent and 60 percent of their contracted allocations—including a 10 percent limit for federal contractors in calendar year
2009. In the Delta counties of Sacramento and San Joaquin, environmental restoration and anticipated urban development played a larger role in this conversion type. The cessation of irrigation resulted in land being reclassified to Grazing Land or Farmland of Local Importance, which could be reversed if environmental factors change. Another factor leading to conversions away from irrigated uses was dairy expansion. This occurred predominantly in Kings County, with more than 1,100 acres of new dairy facilities added to the county’s Farmland of Local Importance total.
Conversion data from 26 years of Important Farmland mapping indicates that for every five acres leaving agricultural use, four convert to Urban Land and one converts to Other Land. This update cycle, conversions to Other Land declined by 2 percent relative to the 2008 period (from 39,959 acres to 39,208 acres). San Joaquin and Sacramento Valley counties accounted for 37 percent and 32 percent of the total, respectively. Large examples of this conversion type included wetland expansions in Fresno and Sutter
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 3
2010 IRRIGATED LAND NET DECREASE: 168,039 ACRES
17 PERCENT LOWER THAN IN 2008
50 PERCENT WAS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY, 20 PERCENT IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY
FRESNO COUNTY’S DECREASE WAS 19 PERCENT OF THE STATEWIDE TOTAL
counties (1,700 and 1,100 acres, respectively). Low density rural residential expansion, totaling just over 5,100 acres in the San Joaquin Valley, was significantly less than the 13,000 acre increase during the 2008 update.
Program Improvements and Challenges
Non-GIS users can now access Important Farmland data via the California Important Farmland Finder1 (CIFF). The CIFF application was developed by the Department of Conservation’s Enterprise Technology Services Division. It provides a number of location search options, as well as the ability to place points, digitize areas of interest, create buffers, and obtain Important Farmland acreages.
Despite the depth of the recent recession, planners at the state and local level have been actively working toward new energy, transportation, and water infrastructure to support the next generation of Californians. Interest in Important Farmland data increased as proposals for solar projects came forward. FMMP analysts responded to requests for evaluation of additional chemical, physical, or water-related data to determine potential productivity limitations at these locations. FMMP provided technical assistance to lead agencies and conducted evaluations of these proposals through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process on behalf of the Department.
Net Change
Statewide, irrigated farmland decreased by 168,039 acres in 2010, an amount 17 percent lower than the record decline reported in 2008 (203,011 acres). The San Joaquin Valley’s nearly 85,000 acre irrigated land decrease accounted for just over 50 percent of the statewide total, while the Sacramento Valley region accounted for 20 percent of the total. Land idling was the single largest reason for land being removed from irrigated categories.
Additional factors contribute to irrigated farmland decreases, such as urbanization, ecological restoration, and gravel mining. While urbanization remained the dominant driver of farmland conversion in Southern California during the 2010 update, land idling and ecological restoration had greater impact on irrigated totals than urbanization in all other regions.
Countering the net loss of irrigated farmland in most counties, there were a few locations with net irrigated land increases in 2010. These were clustered in the eastern foothills of the northern San Joaquin Valley, with Merced County’s 5,964 acre increase leading that of adjacent Stanislaus and Madera counties (3,455 acres
and 1,181 acres, respectively). These increases were dominated by blocks of orchards or vineyards, the largest nearly four square miles in size. Coastal winegrowing counties and the new olive groves of Tehama County comprised the remaining counties with net positive irrigated totals.
1984-2010 Net Land Use Change
During the 13 biennial reporting cycles since FMMP was established, nearly 1.4 million acres of agricultural land in California were converted to nonagricultural purposes. This represents an area larger in size than Merced County,
1 http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/
California Department of Conservation
Page 4
1984-2010 TRENDS
1.4 MILLION ACRES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM FARMING USES
79 PERCENT OF FARMLAND CONVERSIONS WERE TO URBAN LAND (1.1 MILLION NEW URBAN ACRES)
47 PERCENT OF THE CONVERSIONS WERE FROM PRIME FARMLAND
or a rate of nearly one square mile every four days. Nearly 80 percent of this land was urbanized, and 19 percent became one of the miscellaneous land uses grouped into the Other Land category. New water bodies represent the remaining 1 percent of farmland conversion.
The largest losses in agricultural land have been from the Prime Farmland category (662,297 acres). The only agricultural category to increase over the 26 year period has been Unique Farmland (15,766 acres) due to expansion of high value crops—mostly orchards and vineyards—on hilly terrain.
FMMP historic data also illustrates trends in agricultural and urban conversion since 1984. Urbanization declined in the periods of recession—the early-to-mid-1990’s and the late 2000’s. Irrigated farmland acreage decreased in almost every update cycle. Dryland farming and grazing have frequently moved in the opposite direction of irrigated land, as multi-year hydrologic and economic factors influence how much land growers put into production.
As 2012 mapping proceeds, the development of infrastructure to support the next generation of
Californians is anticipated to impact its agricultural land resources. The Department of Conservation will continue to support informed planning decisions with timely and accurate agricultural land resource data, capturing these trends as they evolve.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 5
Chapter 1: The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
DOCUMENTING CHANGES IN AGRICULTURAL LAND USE SINCE 1984 The goal of the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) is to provide consistent,
timely, and accurate data to decision makers for use in assessing agricultural land resource status in California. The extent of urbanization since mapping was initiated is illustrated in yellow for the Bakersfield area of Kern County (Figure 1).
Approximately 98 percent of the privately owned land in the state (49.1 million acres) was mapped during the 2010 update cycle by FMMP. The survey area is shown on page 7 (Figure 2). Each map is updated every two years, providing an archive to track land use change over time.
Using a geographic information system (GIS), aerial imagery, comments from local agencies, and other information, FMMP combines soil quality data and current land use information to produce Important Farmland Maps. This program is mandated under Government Code Section 65570, and funded through the state's Soil Conservation Fund. This fund receives revenues from Land Conservation Act (commonly referred to as the Williamson Act) contract cancellation fees.
Advances in technology have supported significant FMMP data improvements over the years. Most recently, the California Important Farmland Finder allows users to locate their area of interest on mobile devices and desktops using many different search features. This allows use of the data in the field, complementing the
Program’s printed maps, PDF maps, statistics, field reports, and GIS data. The maps and data are used in environmental studies to assess the impacts of proposed development on agricultural and open space land. A number of jurisdictions base their agricultural land mitigation requirements on the amounts of Important Farmland affected by
FIGURE 1: URBANIZATION IN THE BAKERSFIELD AREA, KERN COUNTY, 1988-2010
California Department of Conservation
Page 6
development project conversions. FMMP data is also used in urbanization and environmental modeling, and comparative land cover studies.
In addition, only land that is classified in one of the four main agricultural categories on Important Farmland Maps is eligible for enrollment in Land Conservation Act Farmland Security Zone (FSZ) contracts. Under FSZ contracts, landowners receive substantial property tax benefits in exchange for their commitment to keep their land in agricultural use for 20-year periods.
This is the thirteenth Farmland Conversion Report produced by the FMMP, the current report covering the 2008 to 2010 period.
Important Farmland Map Categories
FMMP's study area coincides with boundaries of U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) modern soil surveys. Technical soil ratings and current land use information are combined to determine the appropriate map category. The minimum land use mapping unit for all categories is 10 acres unless otherwise noted. Soil units as small as one acre are maintained to most accurately represent the original USDA data.
Prime Farmland has the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long-term agricultural production. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. Land must have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
Farmland of Statewide Importance is similar to Prime Farmland but with minor shortcomings, such as greater slopes or less ability to store soil moisture. Land must have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
Unique Farmland consists of lesser quality soils used for the production of the state's leading agricultural crops. This land is usually irrigated, but may include nonirrigated orchards or vineyards as found in some climatic zones in California. Land must have been cropped at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
Farmland of Local Importance is land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by each county's board of supervisors and a local advisory committee. The definitions for this category are detailed in Appendix E of this report.
Grazing Land is land on which the existing vegetation is suited to the grazing of livestock. This category was developed in cooperation with the California Cattlemen's Association, University of California Cooperative Extension, and other groups interested in the extent of grazing activities.
Urban and Built-up Land is occupied by structures with a building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately 6 structures to a 10-acre parcel. Common examples include residential, industrial, commercial, institutional facilities, prisons, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, and water control structures.
Water is defined as perennial water bodies with an extent of at least 40 acres.
Other Land is land not included in any other mapping category. Common examples include low density rural developments, vegetative and riparian areas not suitable for livestock grazing, confined animal agriculture
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 7
facilities, strip mines, borrow pits, and water bodies smaller than 40 acres. Vacant and nonagricultural land surrounded on all sides by urban development and greater than 40 acres is mapped as Other Land. More detailed data on these uses is available in counties containing the Rural Land Use Mapping categories.
Rural Land Use Mapping Categories
The Rural Land Mapping project provides more map and statistical detail than standard Important Farmland Map products by classifying Other Land into five subcategories, as described on page 7. This data is only available in the eight San Joaquin Valley counties and Mendocino County at this time; please see page 23 and the Appendix D tables.
Rural Residential Land includes residential areas of one to five structures per ten acres.
Semi-Agricultural and Rural Commercial includes farmsteads, small packing sheds, unpaved parking areas, composting facilities, firewood lots, and campgrounds.
Vacant or Disturbed Land consists of open field areas that do not qualify for an agricultural category, mineral and oil extraction areas, and rural freeway interchanges.
Confined Animal Agriculture includes aquaculture, dairies, feedlots, and poultry facilities.
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation covers heavily wooded, rocky or barren areas, riparian and wetland areas, grassland areas that do not qualify for Grazing Land due to their size or land management restrictions, small water bodies, and recreational water ski lakes. Constructed wetlands are also included in this category. The Rural Land classes are not designed for interpretation as habitat. Geographic data on the extent of habitat for various species may be available from other state and federal entities.
Optional Designation
Land Committed to Nonagricultural Use is defined as existing farmland, grazing land, and vacant areas that have a permanent commitment for development. This optional designation allows local governments to provide detail on the nature of changes expected to occur in the future. It is available both statistically and as an overlay to the Important Farmland Map.
California Department of Conservation
Page 8
Survey Area Coverage
In Figure 2, the ‘Irrigated Farmland’ area includes the Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Unique Farmland categories. The ‘Dryland Farming and Grazing Land’ designation includes the Farmland of Local Importance and Grazing Land categories.
Locations shown as ‘Out of Survey Area’ may be added in the future, while those indicated as ‘Local, State, and Federal Owned Land’ are not planned for incorporation. Examples of government-owned land include National Parks and Forests and Bureau of Land Management property. Please note that small areas of public land are included within the Important Farmland survey area—generally appearing as ‘Other Land’ on the map.
FIGURE 2: 2010 IMPORTANT FARMLAND SURVEY AREA
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 9
Chapter 2: 2010 Improvements and Challenges
A WEB-BASED, SEARCHABLE PLATFORM AND INFRASTRUCTURE SITE ANALYSES HIGHLIGHT NEW TRENDS Each update cycle provides the opportunity to make improvements to the Important Farmland
data, in order to achieve increased accuracy, process efficiency, or better reporting capabilities. The 2010 mapping cycle posed unique challenges because it coincided with the depth of California’s recent recession. Departmental technology support enabled development of more easily accessible Important Farmland data, while FMMP staff focused on evaluating farmland in a larger perspective, in response to changing land use trends.
California Important Farmland Finder (CIFF)
http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ The CIFF application was developed by the Department’s Enterprise Technology Services Division, as a way to facilitate user access to FMMP data. Searches can be conducted by county, address, Zip Code, lat/long coordinates, or by using the geolocate function on mobile devices. Users may place points, digitize areas of interest, and obtain Important Farmland acreages.
A one mile buffer is available to determine Important Farmland status (Figure 3). This tool provides land sellers and agents the data they need to comply with right to farm real estate disclosure legislation.2 Data can also be downloaded from CIFF in GIS format.
Infrastructure for the Next Generation of Californians
Planners at the state and local level are actively working toward development of new energy, transportation, and water infrastructure to support the next generation of Californians. The largest impact of infrastructure projects during the 2010 update was associated with renewable energy generation. Electric utility companies in California are required to have 33 percent of their retail sales derived from renewable sources by 2020.3 Agricultural land is attractive for siting photovoltaic solar facilities due to its level terrain, existing land disturbance, decreased likelihood of 2 AB 2881 (Wolk, Chapter 686, Statutes of 2009). 3 Public Resources Code, starting with Section 25740.
FIGURE 3: CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT FARMLAND FINDER EXAMPLE
BUFFERED POLYGON AND ACREAGE
California Department of Conservation
Page 10
hosting species of concern, and proximity to transmission lines or substations. The goals of maintaining a vibrant agricultural economy and resource base while meeting the renewable generation standard are of concern to many decision makers. Interest in Important Farmland data increased as proposals for solar projects came forward. FMMP analysts responded to requests for evaluation of additional chemical, physical, or water-related data to determine potential productivity limitations at these locations.
Additional projects expected to have a large footprint on agriculture in the next few years include California High Speed Rail and the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. FMMP provided technical assistance to lead agencies and conducted evaluations of these proposals through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process on behalf of the Department.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 11
Chapter 3: Understanding the Data
LOCATING AND INTERPRETING THE CALIFORNIA FARMLAND CONVERSION REPORT’S TABULAR DATA AND GRAPHICS. Important Farmland information is developed on an individual county basis, taking two years
to map the 49.1 million acre survey area. This report begins with each county’s information, compiling it in various ways to produce the summary and analysis in Chapter 4.
Source Data: County Conversion Tables - Appendix A
These tables include acreage tallies and conversion statistics for individual counties. Figure 4 depicts how conversion tables are constructed.
Statewide Conversion – Chapter 4, Table 3
This table summarizes material from all three sections of the Appendix A tables and has the same structure as the individual county tables.
2008 and 2010 County Acreage Tallies – Appendix B
Values for the individual years (Tables B-1 and B-2) are extracted from Part I of the tables in Appendix A. These tables also indicate the proportion of each county that lies within the FMMP survey area—mapping typically ends at the boundaries of National Forests, for example. Table B-3 shows this same information for 2010, grouped by region.
LAND USE CONVERSION SUMMARY (1)
PART I PART IILand Use Totals and Net Changes Land Committed to Nonagricultural Use
2008-2010 ACREAGE CHANGES TOTAL ACREAGE ACRES ACRES TOTAL NET TOTAL
LAND USE CATEGORY INVENTORIED LOST GAINED ACREAGE ACREAGE LAND USE CATEGORY ACREAGE2008 2010 (-) (+) CHANGED CHANGED 2010
Prime Farmland (2) 5,249,116 5,146,562 134,394 31,840 166,234 -102,554 Prime Farmland 9,980 Farmland of Statew ide Importance (2) 2,683,573 2,621,601 84,340 22,368 106,708 -61,972 Farmland of Statew ide Import 1,922 Unique Farmland (2) 1,335,387 1,331,874 49,153 45,640 94,793 -3,513 Unique Farmland 3,064 Farmland of Local Importance 3,120,278 3,186,017 91,110 156,849 247,959 65,739 Farmland of Local Importance 27,613 IMPORTANT FARMLAND SUBTOTAL 12,388,354 12,286,054 358,997 256,697 615,694 -102,300 IMPORTANT FARMLAND SUB 42,579 Grazing Land 19,175,956 19,200,602 88,627 113,273 201,900 24,646 Grazing Land 56,546 AGRICULTURAL LAND SUBTOTAL 31,564,310 31,486,656 447,624 369,970 817,594 -77,654 AGRICULTURAL LAND SUBT 99,125 Urban and Built-Up Land 3,574,195 3,618,699 8,132 52,636 60,768 44,504 Urban and Built-Up Land 0 Other Land 13,216,983 13,252,338 50,602 85,957 136,559 35,355 Other Land 45,362 Water Area 716,701 714,496 2,705 500 3,205 -2,205 Water Area 0 TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED 49,072,189 49,072,189 509,063 509,063 1,018,126 0 TOTAL ACREAGE REPORTED 144,487
PART III Land Use Conversion from 2008 to 2010Farmland of Farmland of Subtotal Total Urban and Total
LAND USE CATEGORY Prime Statew ide Unique Local Important Grazing Agricultural Built-Up Other Water Converted To Farmland Importance Farmland Importance Farmland Land Land Land Land Area Another Use Prime Farmland (2) to: -- 116 1,548 60,406 62,070 42,915 104,985 8,414 20,994 1 134,394 Farmland of Statew ide Importance (2) to: 127 -- 468 53,423 54,018 19,902 73,920 2,877 7,543 0 84,340 Unique Farmland (2) to: 551 204 -- 16,262 17,017 20,357 37,374 1,109 10,670 0 49,153 Farmland of Local Importance to: 17,072 12,112 15,393 -- 44,577 19,983 64,560 8,593 17,946 11 91,110 IMPORTANT FARMLAND SUBTOTAL 17,750 12,432 17,409 130,091 177,682 103,157 280,839 20,993 57,153 12 358,997 Grazing Land to: 7,277 6,188 22,825 22,660 58,950 -- 58,950 6,917 22,735 25 88,627 AGRICULTURAL LAND SUBTOTAL 25,027 18,620 40,234 152,751 236,632 103,157 339,789 27,910 79,888 37 447,624 Urban and Built-Up Land to: 607 292 397 669 1,965 1,594 3,559 -- 4,431 142 8,132 Other Land to: 6,205 3,456 4,964 3,343 17,968 7,598 25,566 24,715 -- 321 50,602 Water Area to: 1 0 45 86 132 924 1,056 11 1,638 -- 2,705 TOTAL ACREAGE CONVERTED to: 31,840 22,368 45,640 156,849 256,697 113,273 369,970 52,636 85,957 500 509,0631. This table includes acreage data for 45 counties. Conversion data for counties mapped using Interim Farmland categories are not included.2. Figures for "Net Acreage Changed" in Part I and for Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statew ide Importance, and Unique Farmland categories in Part III, are partially due to
PART I:Indicates county area mapped & overall change
in each category.
PART II:Land expected to be developed (voluntary submission by local
governments).
PART III:Raw data from GIS provides detail on every acre of change that occurred. Changes result from revising the two-year-old land use data based on new imagery and field verification. In addition, any changes made by USDA to its digital soil survey data
(SSURGO data) will appear in Part III.
FOOTNOTES: Information on large or unusual conversions and other descriptive material.
FIGURE 4: CONVERSION TABLE STRUCTUREFOR COUNTY AND STATEWIDE DATA
California Department of Conservation
Page 12
County and Regional Conversion Summaries – Appendix C
The counties are grouped into geographic regions as seen in Figure 5. Much of the analysis in Chapter 4 is based on the data in Appendix C.
Table C-1 Classifies sources of new urban land for the period, by county and region.
Table C-2 Identifies conversions in or out of agriculture aside from urbanization, capturing the ebb and flow of agricultural land use change over time.
Table C-3 Documents net agricultural change from all factors, grouped by region and ranked by acreage.
Rural Land Use Mapping Tables – Appendix D
Contains data on changes associated with a more detailed subdivision of the Other Land category. Data is available for nine project counties at this time.
Simplifying Assumptions
In order to conduct comparative analysis, certain simplifying assumptions have been made. For example, Unique Farmland is considered to be an irrigated farmland category, even though a small percentage of land within the Unique Farmland category supports high value nonirrigated crops, such as some coastal vineyards. Conversely, Farmland of Local Importance is considered to be a nonirrigated category although it also supports some irrigated pasture on lower-quality soils.
Statistical Notes
As changes are made to the land use data, there are instances where residual pieces of land are left that are smaller than the 10- or 40-acre minimum land use mapping unit. In order to maintain map unit consistency, these small units are absorbed into the most appropriate adjacent land use type. This process may result in small shifts among categories that appear anomalous in the conversion statistics—such as urban to agriculture or Prime Farmland to Farmland of Statewide Importance.
Once land use and digital soil data are merged to create the Important Farmland data, units of less than 1.0 acre are reclassified into the next most appropriate category to optimize the data files. Tabular data is reported in whole numbers; small variations in category totals may result from rounding to whole numbers.
Particularly large or anomalous changes are footnoted at the bottom of each table. Additional detail is available in the field analyst report produced for each county.
FIGURE 5: REGIONS USED FOR FMMP ANALYSIS
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 13
FIGURE 6: STATEWIDE IMPORTANT FARMLAND CONVERSION SUMMARY (ACRES)
Chapter 4: Land Use Conversion, 2008-2010
URBANIZATION RATES DECREASED SHARPLY, AND IRRIGATED FARMLAND LOSSES DECREASED TO 2004-2006 LEVELS. LAND IDLING IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WAS THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO FARMLAND LOSS. California’s agricultural landscape continues to evolve in conjunction with economic and
resource-related factors. Between 2008 and 2010, urban development impacted 44,504 acres, 39 percent fewer than the 72,548 acres urbanized between 2006 and 2008. Approximately 25 percent of urban conversions were derived from irrigated farmland, and 30 percent from dryland farming and grazing land. The statewide 2008-2010 conversion summary, Table 3, is located on page 15. Comparative changes in important farmland categories for the two most recent update cycles are shown in Figure 6 below.
A total of 168,039 acres were removed from irrigated land uses during the 2010 update; a 17 percent decrease compared with the 203,011 acre irrigated land loss posted in 2008. These totals include the impact of all factors—urbanization, land idling, habitat conversion, and low density rural development. As was the case during the 2006-08 mapping cycle, conversions from irrigated land to Grazing Land and Farmland of Local Importance exceeded urban land conversions. The location of idled lands likely indicates water availability issues in parts of the state, and is discussed later in this chapter.
Prime Farmland Statewide & Unique Farmland
Farmland of Local Importance Grazing Land Urban and Built-up
Land Other Land & Water
2006-2008 -98,471 -104,540 75,622 38,836 72,548 16,0052008-2010 -102,554 -65,485 65,739 24,646 44,504 33,150
-110,000
-95,000
-80,000
-65,000
-50,000
-35,000
-20,000
-5,000
10,000
25,000
40,000
55,000
70,000
85,000
100,000
California Department of Conservation
Page 14
Urbanization 2008-2010 Source Data: Appendix Table C-1 Southern California and San Joaquin Valley counties comprised the top ten urbanizing list during the 2010 Important Farmland update, as Riverside County continued to lead in overall urbanization (Table 1). Four other counties in the region remained in the top ranks: San Diego, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Orange. In total, Southern California accommodated 44 percent of the State’s urbanization between 2008 and 2010. Five of the San Joaquin Valley counties completed 2010’s top ten list. Bay Area, Foothill, and Sacramento Valley counties were absent from the top urbanizing list in 2010. Most counties had lower urbanization totals than during the prior update, many decreasing by significant amounts.
Although only two regions appeared in the top ten list, overall urbanization was slightly more dispersed during the 2010 update—while the top ten counties hosted 74 percent of statewide urban growth during 2008, the figure was 71 percent during the 2010 update.
Regional rankings were again dominated by Southern California and the San Joaquin Valley (Table 2). Although both regions showed a decline in urbanization relative to the 2006-08 period, Southern California’s decrease was larger—dropping by 45 percent, compared to the 22 percent drop for the San Joaquin Valley. The Sierra Foothill region experienced the largest drop in urbanization, 92 percent, due to a near halt of development in Placer County. The increased rate of development in the North State region was primarily due to recreational facilities, including golf course resorts in Lake and Modoc counties.4 The Central Coast region’s growth rate was nearly identical in both updates.
Housing and commercial developments were the most common new urban land uses. New planned developments consisted of single family homes along with schools, parks, and neighborhood commercial uses. The scale of projects was reduced compared to prior updates. While projects of 400 to 600 acres were common earlier in the decade, the largest 2010 example, 190 acres, occurred in
4 Langtry Farms and Vineyard private golf course in Lake County, and an expansion of Likely Place RV and Golf Resort in Modoc County.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 36,043 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 19,702SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY 19,346 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY 15,132SAN FRANCISCO BAY 5,807 SAN FRANCISCO BAY 3,735SACRAMENTO VALLEY 5,493 SACRAMENTO VALLEY 2,973SIERRA FOOTHILL 3,906 CENTRAL COAST 1,419CENTRAL COAST 1,479 NORTH STATE 1,224NORTH STATE 474 SIERRA FOOTHILL 319
2008-10
TABLE 2: REGIONAL URBANIZATION RANKINGUrbanization From All Categories
net acres2006-08
Riverside 15,139 Riverside 5,874Kern 9,356 San Diego 4,646San Bernardino 7,005 Los Angeles 4,024San Diego 5,184 Kings 3,627Orange 3,614 Kern 3,203Los Angeles 2,881 Fresno 3,186Placer 2,853 San Bernardino 2,180San Joaquin 2,698 Tulare 1,997Sacramento 2,391 San Joaquin 1,400Contra Costa 2,371 Orange 1,249
2006-2008
Urbanization from All CategoriesTop Ten Counties - net acres
2008-2010
TABLE 1: COUNTY URBANIZATION RANKS
TA
BL
E 3
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
FA
RM
LA
ND
CO
NV
ER
SIO
N S
UM
MA
RY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIL
an
d U
se T
ota
ls a
nd
Ne
t C
ha
ng
es
La
nd
Co
mm
itte
d t
o N
on
ag
ric
ult
ura
l Use
2
00
8-1
0 A
CR
EA
GE
CH
AN
GE
S
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
AC
RE
SA
CR
ES
TO
TA
LN
ET
T
OT
AL
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YIN
VE
NT
OR
IED
(1
)L
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
5,2
49
,11
6
5,1
46
,56
2
13
4,3
94
3
1,8
40
1
66
,23
4
-10
2,5
54
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d9
,98
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2,6
83
,57
3
2,6
21
,60
1
84
,34
0
22
,36
8
10
6,7
08
-6
1,9
72
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
,92
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
,33
5,3
87
1
,33
1,8
74
4
9,1
53
4
5,6
40
9
4,7
93
-3
,51
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
,06
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e3
,12
0,2
78
3
,18
6,0
17
9
1,1
10
1
56
,84
9
24
7,9
59
6
5,7
39
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
27
,61
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
12
,38
8,3
54
1
2,2
86
,05
4
35
8,9
97
2
56
,69
7
61
5,6
94
-1
02
,30
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
42
,57
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
19
,17
5,9
56
1
9,2
00
,60
2
88
,62
7
11
3,2
73
2
01
,90
0
24
,64
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
56
,54
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
1,5
64
,31
0
31
,48
6,6
56
4
47
,62
4
36
9,9
70
8
17
,59
4
-77
,65
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L9
9,1
25
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
,57
4,1
95
3
,61
8,6
99
8
,13
2
52
,63
6
60
,76
8
44
,50
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
13
,21
6,9
83
1
3,2
52
,33
8
50
,60
2
85
,95
7
13
6,5
59
3
5,3
55
O
the
r L
an
d4
5,3
62
W
ate
r A
rea
(1
)7
16
,70
1
71
4,4
96
2
,70
5
50
0
3,2
05
-2
,20
5
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D4
9,0
72
,18
9
49
,07
2,1
89
5
09
,06
3
50
9,0
63
1
,01
8,1
26
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
44
,48
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
11
6
1,5
48
6
0,4
06
6
2,0
70
4
2,9
15
1
04
,98
5
8,4
14
2
0,9
94
1
1
34
,39
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
12
7
--
46
8
53
,42
3
54
,01
8
19
,90
2
73
,92
0
2,8
77
7
,54
3
0
84
,34
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:5
51
2
04
-
- 1
6,2
62
1
7,0
17
2
0,3
57
3
7,3
74
1
,10
9
10
,67
0
0
49
,15
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:1
7,0
72
1
2,1
12
1
5,3
93
-
- 4
4,5
77
1
9,9
83
6
4,5
60
8
,59
3
17
,94
6
11
9
1,1
10
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
7,7
50
1
2,4
32
1
7,4
09
1
30
,09
1
17
7,6
82
1
03
,15
7
28
0,8
39
2
0,9
93
5
7,1
53
1
2
35
8,9
97
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:7
,27
7
6,1
88
2
2,8
25
2
2,6
60
5
8,9
50
-
- 5
8,9
50
6
,91
7
22
,73
5
25
8
8,6
27
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
25
,02
7
18
,62
0
40
,23
4
15
2,7
51
2
36
,63
2
10
3,1
57
3
39
,78
9
27
,91
0
79
,88
8
37
4
47
,62
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:6
07
2
92
3
97
6
69
1
,96
5
1,5
94
3
,55
9
--
4,4
31
1
42
8
,13
2
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
6,2
05
3
,45
6
4,9
64
3
,34
3
17
,96
8
7,5
98
2
5,5
66
2
4,7
15
-
- 3
21
5
0,6
02
W
ate
r A
rea
(1
)to
:1
0
4
5
86
1
32
9
24
1
,05
6
11
1
,63
8
--
2,7
05
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:3
1,8
40
2
2,3
68
4
5,6
40
1
56
,84
9
25
6,6
97
1
13
,27
3
36
9,9
70
5
2,6
36
8
5,9
57
5
00
5
09
,06
3
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o o
the
r c
ate
go
rie
s in
Sa
n L
uis
Ob
isp
o a
nd
Sa
nta
Ba
rba
ra c
ou
nti
es
du
e t
o u
pp
er
rea
ch
es
of
Tw
itc
he
ll R
ese
rvo
ir b
ein
g d
ry a
nd
use
d f
or
oth
er
pu
rpo
ses
in m
ost
ye
ars
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d d
ue
to
mu
ltip
le f
ac
tors
, in
clu
din
g c
rop
pin
g in
fo
rme
r w
ate
r re
ten
tio
n b
asi
ns,
ab
an
do
nm
en
t o
f u
rba
n u
ses
for
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s,
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
FA
RM
LA
ND
CO
NV
ER
SIO
N S
UM
MA
RY
California Department of Conservation
Page 16
LAND USE CONVERSION EXAMPLES EXAMPLES IN THIS REPORT DESCRIBE LARGE OR PARTICULARLY NOTABLE CHANGES, AND DO NOT FULLY ACCOUNT FOR THE EXTENT OF CHANGE IN EACH COUNTY MAP.
PLEASE REFER TO FMMP FIELD ANALYST REPORTS ON THE PROGRAM WEB SITE FOR
MORE DETAILED INFORMATION.
Indio, Riverside County.5 Golf course construction was also significantly scaled back, with FMMP field analyst reports citing at most one or two facilities per county. The peak of golf course development occurred between 2000 and 2002, as large percentages of new urban land in Riverside and San Diego counties
(25 percent and 14 percent, respectively) consisted of golf-related communities.6
Schools, parks, and shopping centers individually occupy relatively small footprints but occurred frequently and in many locations. The largest single school example was an 80 acre campus in San Bernardino County.7 Distribution centers and industrial developments were much less frequent during the 2010 update. The most notable change was approximately 110 acres of airport-related construction in San Bernardino County.8
Infrastructure development was dominated by water control, waste, and energy services. Water treatment plants, storage ponds, groundwater recharge ponds, and evaporation basins were most commonly constructed in central and southern California. Such facilities totaled more than 2,000 acres in Kings County, more than 1,500 acres in Kern County, and 400 acres for a single water treatment facility near the city of Lancaster, Los Angeles County. Landfill and transfer yard expansions were few in number and size this update. Scattered, ten-acre expansions occurred around the state, and the largest single example, 50 acres, occurred in San Joaquin County.9 Photovoltaic solar facilities of 50 acres or more occurred in Fresno and Riverside counties. At 170 acres, the largest solar project constructed was in Blythe, Riverside County. Additional solar facilities were breaking ground at the end of the 2010 update. These projects will be documented as conversions in the 2012 edition of the maps.
Urbanization’s impact on irrigated farmland was significantly lower during the 2010 mapping cycle (Table 4 and Appendix Table C-1). Kern County hosted approximately 300 acres of new homes on former farmland in the Bakersfield area, while other jurisdictions converted between 10 and 50 acres each for residential and commercial purposes. New water control facilities occupied nearly 1,000 acres of irrigated land in Kern County, in the Calders Corner, Pumpkin Center, Strand Oil Field, and Rosamond areas.
In second ranking Tulare County, the Ridge Creek Dinuba Golf Course and Visalia Riverway Sports Park were notable additions to the urban footprint. Visalia, Tulare, and Porterville each added a mix of residential, commercial, and community facilities. Fresno County’s
5 Sun City Shadow Hills Community. 6 California Farmland Conversion Report 2000-2002. 7 Oak Hills High School in Hesperia. 8 Two large structures at the Southern California Logistics Center, Victorville. 9 Austin Road Landfill in San Joaquin County.
Kern 3,637 Kern 1,661Riverside 3,267 Tulare 1,634San Joaquin 2,006 Fresno 1,246Tulare 1,526 Riverside 1,178Fresno 1,409 Kings 1,004San Bernardino 1,247 San Joaquin 824Orange 1,131 San Bernardino 331Stanislaus 639 Stanislaus 328Imperial 633 Imperial 280Sacramento 603 Ventura 267
Irrigated Farmland to UrbanTop Ten Counties - net acres
TABLE 4: IRRIGATED FARMLAND TO URBAN RANKS
2006-2008 2008-2010
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 17
notable conversions of irrigated farmland to urban uses included 135 acres at the Mendota Federal Correction Facility,10 and nearly 300 acres each for new home development in the cities of Clovis and Fresno.
Tulare County was notable as having the highest proportion of urban development on Prime Farmland (72 percent) statewide, followed by Monterey County (69 percent).
All told, 33 percent of new urban land in the San Joaquin Valley came from Prime Farmland, and an additional 16 percent came from Farmland of Statewide Importance and Unique Farmland during the 2008-10 period. These statistics continue a trend in which Prime and irrigated farmland is being impacted at lower proportions compared to prior updates. As recently as 2002-04,11 48 percent of urbanization in the region was derived from Prime Farmland, and 13 percent came from Farmland of Statewide Importance and Unique Farmland. However, the proportion of new urban lands in the Valley located on idled farmland and grazing land has increased, from 18 percent during the 2008 cycle to 20 percent in the 2010 update. This may reflect a recession-induced lag time in the project development process.
Statewide, 25 percent of urbanization took place on irrigated farmland (18 percent Prime Farmland, 7 percent on lesser quality soils). Another 30 percent came from dryland farming and grazing uses, some of which may have been idled in anticipation of development. The relative location and type of land converted to urban uses is shown graphically in Figure 7.
10 http://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/men/index.jsp 11 California Farmland Conversion Report 2002-2004.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
CENTRAL COAST
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
SIERRA FOOTHILL
SACRAMENTO VALLEY
NORTH STATE
From Nonagricultural Categories
From Nonirrigated Agriculture
From Statewide & Unique
From Prime
FIGURE 7: SOURCES OF URBAN LAND 2008-2010(acres)
California Department of Conservation
Page 18
Other Changes Affecting Agricultural Land 2008-2010 Source Data: Appendix Table C-2 A major goal of the Important Farmland mapping project is to track long-term trends in agricultural land resource use. The biennial reporting of these trends to the Legislature is statutorily mandated under Government Code Section 65570. While urbanization is an important component, economic and resource availability factors also lead to lands being more intensively farmed or being taken out of irrigated use. Appendix Table C-2 documents the extent to which these factors affected the data during the 2008-10 mapping cycle.
Land is converted to irrigated agricultural use when dry pastures or natural vegetation are converted, or when idled land is brought back into production. Conversions to irrigated categories totaled 99,834 acres between 2008 and 2010, an increase of 22 percent from the prior cycle. Nearly 68 percent of the land brought into agricultural use did not meet the criteria for Prime Farmland. Throughout the history of the Program, newly irrigated land has ranged between 65 percent and 70 percent non-Prime Farmland.
San Joaquin Valley counties accounted for 51 percent of the land brought into irrigated uses (Figure 8), while the Sacramento Valley and the Central Coast comprised 15 percent and 12 percent, respectively.
Five counties had irrigated land expansions in excess of 5,000 acres: Fresno, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, and Stanislaus (Appendix Table C-2). Many of the additions were almond orchards along the Sierra Nevada foothills in the zone between San Joaquin and Madera counties. Almond acreage has continued to expand throughout the past decade due to strong market conditions. The California Almond Board reports a
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
CENTRAL COAST
SAN FRANCISCO
BAY
SIERRA FOOTHILL
SACRAMENTO VALLEY
NORTH STATE
To Statewide & Unique
To Prime
FIGURE 8: CONVERSIONS TO IRRIGATED FARMLAND 2008-2010
(acres)
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 19
statewide increase from 605,000 planted acres in the year 2000 to 805,000 acres in 2010.12 County Agricultural Commissioner Reports document new almond plantings between 2008 and 2010 of 6,200 acres in Merced County and more than 16,000 acres in Stanislaus County.13
Other crops most commonly associated with irrigated land increases include high value vineyards, walnut orchards, and vegetable crops. Vegetable crop examples from Merced County14 include expansions in tomatoes and sweet potatoes of nearly 3,000 acres each between 2008 and 2010. Cotton is another major crop that was not popular early in the decade due to pest-related and market issues, but statewide acreage has rebounded, including a Merced County increase of more than 4,200 acres between 2008 and 2010. Annually cropped lands that were idled due to pest or market-related issues may be brought back into production under improved circumstances. These changes would contribute to irrigated land acreage increases mapped during the FMMP biennial update.
The largest irrigated land expansions in the Sacramento Valley occurred in Glenn and Tehama counties, at more than 3,400 acres each. FMMP has documented almond orchard expansion on the western side of the Sacramento Valley since the 2004 map update. During the 2010 update, olive orchards were the most notable new agricultural use. County crop reports document olive acreage increases of more than 64 percent in Glenn County and 28 percent in Tehama County between 2008 and 2010.15 New high-density planting and mechanical harvesting systems allow orchards to reach full production in a shorter time frame while reducing labor costs. The largest olive processing facility in the United States was recently constructed in Glenn County,16 which is likely to lead to additional orchard acreage as the market increases for the award-winning olive oil harvested from these trees.
The central coast counties of Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara each had increases of more than 3,000 acres in their irrigated farmland footprint. Much of this growth was associated with vineyards and limited vegetable crop expansions. Southern California’s irrigated farmland increases were largest in Riverside County, at just over 4,100 acres. Vineyard development and land devoted to nurseries were the primary increases. The Temecula, Hemet, San Jacinto, Perris, and La Quinta areas hosted most of these increases.
12 http://www.almondboard.com/AbouttheAlmondBoard/Documents/ALM110600_Almanac2011_LR.pdf 13 http://www.co.merced.ca.us/Archive.aspx?AMID=36 and http://www.stanag.org/crop-reports.shtm 14 http://www.co.merced.ca.us/Archive.aspx?AMID=36 15 http://westernfarmpress.com/orchard-crops/california-olive-oil-deemed-world-class-acreage-expands 16 http://www.oliveoiltimes.com/olive-oil-business/north-america/vossen-california-olive-oil-production-will-set-a-new-record/8434
FIGURE 9: VINEYARD EXPANSION IN THE SIERRA FOOTHILLS, STANISLAUS COUNTY
California Department of Conservation
Page 20
Land is removed from irrigated categories through urbanization, conversion to Other Land, or reclassification to a dryland agriculture class (Grazing Land and Farmland of Local Importance). Urban reclassifications were discussed at the beginning of Chapter 4.
Reclassifications to Grazing Land or Farmland of Local Importance due to land idling or long-term dryland farming decreased by 3 percent compared with the 2008 mapping cycle (Figure 10). Reclassifications of this type stood at 220,453 acres in 2008 and 213,265 acres in 2010. During both mapping cycles, the San Joaquin Valley experienced the vast majority of the long-term land idling.
Five counties had 10,000 or more acres of this conversion type: Fresno, Kings, Kern, Sacramento and San Joaquin. Fresno County’s reclassification of more than 34,000 acres led all counties, representing 16 percent of the statewide total for this conversion type. Most of the conversions that occurred on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley were associated with ongoing drought and salinity-related land retirement. Deliveries of irrigation water to federal water districts dropped from 100 percent in 2006 to less than 50 percent in each of the subsequent years—including a 10 percent allocation in calendar year 2009.17 Similarly, State Water Project deliveries ranged between 35 percent and 60 percent between 2007 and 2010.18
17 http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvo/vungvari/water_allocations_historical.pdf 18 http://www.water.ca.gov/swpao/deliveries.cfm
-130,000
-115,000
-100,000
-85,000
-70,000
-55,000
-40,000
-25,000
-10,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY CENTRAL COAST
SAN FRANCISCO BAY SIERRA FOOTHILL
SACRAMENTO VALLEY NORTH STATE
To Local & Grazing
To Other Land
FIGURE 10: CONVERSIONS OUT OF IRRIGATED CATEGORIES 2008-2010
(acres)
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 21
The impact of land idling since FMMP mapping was initiated in the central and southern San Joaquin Valley is highlighted in Figure 11. Lands that were irrigated but are now classified as Grazing Land or Farmland of Local Importance are depicted in yellow. Much of this idled land lies within the Westlands Water District.
Water delivery uncertainties and other resource constraints raise the possibility of additional land retirement or conversion. As of the 2010 update, FMMP field analysts have flagged in excess of 102,000 acres in the southern San Joaquin Valley (Fresno, Kern, Kings, and Tulare counties) as being in dryland or fallow status for two update cycles. Should these conditions continue, this land will be removed from irrigated farmland categories during the 2012 map update.
Sacramento and San Joaquin counties, which lie at the confluence of the rivers sharing their names, saw more than 11,000 acres and 14,000 acres, respectively, reclassified due to long-term idling or dryland farming during the 2010 update. Locations in San Joaquin County affected by larger conversions, of 500 acres or more each, occurred in the vicinity of Lathrop, Tracy, Vernalis, and Clifton Court Forebay. These conversions may represent potential urbanization or habitat restoration, depending on location. Large Sacramento County examples with a link to potential urbanization occurred in the North Natomas section of the city of Sacramento, and near the cities of Elk Grove and Galt. Habitat-related fallowing continued on
FIGURE 11: LAND RECLASSIFIED FROM IRRIGATED TO DRYLAND FARMING CATEGORIES, WESTERN FRESNO COUNTY
CONVERSIONS TO DRYLAND USES SHOWN IN YELLOW
California Department of Conservation
Page 22
Sherman Island, site of flood control and mitigation efforts by the California Department of Water Resources.19
Elsewhere in the state, conversion to dryland farming categories was less extensive. Six widely dispersed counties had farmland downgrades in the 5,000 to 10,000 acre range: Imperial, Riverside, Tulare, Solano, Yolo, and Siskiyou. Factors leading to the cessation of irrigation vary based on the geography of the county. In Solano and Yolo counties, land fallowing in association with ecological restoration efforts was in evidence. Large examples occurred near the Cache Slough Restoration Project in Solano County,20 and in the vicinity of the Davis wetlands and Liberty Island restoration projects in Yolo County.21 In Siskiyou County, an ongoing water shortage restricts deliveries for agriculture and habitat in the Klamath Basin and Shasta Valley.22 Tulare County’s conversions reflect the same circumstances as other southern San Joaquin Valley counties. In Riverside County, land left fallow for three or more update cycles (and to a lesser degree nonirrigated grains) occurred adjacent to western Riverside cities, and sites in the Coachella and Palo Verde valleys. Imperial County’s land idling was centered around the communities of Brawley, Calexico, and El Centro, as well as sites closer to the Salton Sea.
Reclassification of irrigated land to Other Land is less frequent but is typically more permanent in nature than land idling. This is because many of the new uses involve low density residential development, mining, ecological restoration, or similar changes.
Between 2008 and 2010, 39,208 acres statewide were reclassified from irrigated agriculture to Other Land. This was a 2 percent decrease from the prior update cycle. The San Joaquin and Sacramento Valley counties accounted for 37 percent and 32 percent of the total, respectively. The most active county for conversion to Other Land this update, at just over 4,200 acres, was Sutter. More than 1,100 acres of this change was due to flooding of former rice fields in the Butte Sink area and adjacent to the Cross Canal. Some of these parcels are associated with the Natomas Basin Conservancy mitigation land project.23 An equally large change resulted from improvements to map alignment and detail along the Sacramento River. The new boundaries better reflect current conditions of the river channel and adjacent land than did the US Geological Survey base maps.
Six other counties had conversions to Other Land that exceeded 2,000 acres: Butte, Fresno, Kern, San Diego, San Joaquin, and Tulare. Notable changes in each county represent the spectrum of uses grouped into the miscellaneous Other Land category:
• Wetland restoration near the Gray Lodge and Llano Seco wildlife areas comprised nearly 25 percent of all conversions of this type in Butte County. In Fresno County, nearly 1,700 acres were converted from Farmland of Local Importance to Other Land in association with the Don Gragnani Wetland Reserve24 project. This conversion constituted 80 percent of Fresno County’s total acres converted to Other Land.
19 http://www.water.ca.gov/floodmgmt/dsmo/ecb/maep/sherman.cfm and http://ccrm.berkeley.edu/resin/pdfs_and_other_docs/background-lit/hanson_5yr-plan.pdf 20 http://www.water.ca.gov/deltainit/docs/6-16-08CacheSlough.pdf 21 http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2011/04/19/rocklin-firm-finishes-yolo-restoration.html and http://www.wildlandsinc.com/four-new-mitigation-and-conservation-banks-approved-in-california/ 22http://www.fws.gov/refuge/tulelake/walkingwetlands.html 23http://www.natomasbasin.org/ 24 www.gragnanifarms.com/wetlands
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 23
• Development projects that were initiated and left in a disturbed condition were notable in Kern and Tulare counties. One such example is the Kern River Raceway,25 a property larger than 100 acres that went into foreclosure in 2010. More recently, the project was sold and is now under construction. The land will be reclassified as Urban and Built-up during the 2012 update.
• Large rural estates encroaching into agricultural areas, evidenced by increased structural density, in parts of San Diego County resulted in conversions to Other Land.
• Aggregate mining at the Teichert Aggregates, Vernalis Plant26 expanded by approximately 330 acres in San Joaquin County.
Counties with Rural Land Mapping Enhancements 2008-2010 Source Data: Appendix D Approximately 27 percent of the Important Farmland survey area is classified as Other Land. While urbanization has historically been the driving force in agricultural land loss, FMMP’s statistics indicate that for every five acres exiting crop or grazing uses, four convert to Urban Land and one converts to Other Land. Because the Other Land category encompasses a disparate group of land uses, and conversions to Other Land are most often geographically separated from urban centers, users requested more specific information about this conversion type. A 2002 pilot project created five subcategories for Other Land: Rural Residential, Semi-Agricultural and Rural Commercial, Confined Animal Agriculture, Vacant or Disturbed Land, and Nonagricultural Vegetation. The pilot effort expanded on a funds-available basis to include all eight San Joaquin Valley counties. Mendocino County was added to the FMMP survey area in 2006 upon the release of its USDA soil survey, and is also mapped using the more detailed classifications. Definitions for the Rural Land Mapping categories are shown on page 7. County-level data and summaries discussed here are located in Appendix D.
Between 2008 and 2010, expansion of Rural Land Mapping categories totaled 12,055 acres (Appendix Tables D-1 and D-2), significantly less than the acreage converted during the prior update (20,108 acres). A decrease in conversions to Rural Residential land was the largest contributor to the change, declining by more than 8,000 acres between the two update cycles. Fresno and San Joaquin counties led in this conversion type, at 1,885 and 1,244 acres, respectively. Nearly three quarters of the rural residential expansion in Fresno County occurred on nonirrigated land, primarily in the Sierra foothills. Conversely, in San Joaquin County, nearly two thirds of the conversion occurred on formerly irrigated farmland.
25 http://www.bakersfieldcalifornian.com/sports/motorsports/x1526556968/New-raceway-blossoming 26 http://www.aggman.com/granite-sets-its-sights-on-the-future/
FIGURE 12: NEW DAIRY FACILITIES IN KINGS COUNTY APPROXIMATELY 170 ACRES WERE ADDED TO THE FACILITY AT LEFT
DURING THE 2010 MAP UPDATE
California Department of Conservation
Page 24
Expansions of the Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial category led on a percentage basis (3.4 percent), but owing to the smaller footprint of agricultural support uses, the increase totaled less than 1,400 acres. Changes of this type were widely distributed among the nine Rural Land Use counties, and Fresno County had the most conversion of this type at 445 acres.
Confined Animal Agriculture acreage expanded by 1,951 acres, a 2.2 percent increase. Kings County’s increase of 1,140 acres dominated27—a number of dairies were added or expanded, four of them were 100 to 200 acres in size. Conversely, in San Joaquin County, a decrease of 150 acres occurred in the Confined Animal Agriculture category during the 2010 update. A series of small dairies around the county were demolished or converted to different uses as low milk prices and high management costs pressured the dairy industry28 into consolidation in recent years. Conversions to Confined Animal Agriculture facilities have been decreasing since a high of 2,579 acres during the 2004-06 update.
Vacant or Disturbed Land can be a category of transition. More than 9,600 acres were reclassified into the Vacant class during the 2010 update. To a large degree, these were farmed lands that were disturbed in preparation for residential subdivisions or other developments but infrastructure was not completed due to the downturn in the real estate market. Another 7,100 acres converted from Vacant to Urban (54 percent), agricultural uses (37 percent), or another Rural Land Use category (9 percent). While FMMP analysts attempt to determine the use to which disturbed land will be put using planning and other data, it is not always possible to determine the future of a site in the span of a single FMMP update cycle. This is particularly true of disturbances resulting in new agricultural uses. The long-term biennial tracking of conversion provides a time series that ultimately captures what occurs to these transitional areas.
Nonagricultural Vegetation increased by a net 1,123 acres. The Fresno County wetland reserve conversion discussed on page 22 was the largest contributor to this increase. A number of counties that would impact this conversion type—particularly in the Sacramento Valley—are not currently available in the Rural Land data format.
Net Irrigated Farmland Change 2008-2010 Source Data: Appendix table C-3 Statewide, irrigated farmland decreased by a net 168,039 acres during the 2010 update (Appendix Table C-3). This figure is 17 percent lower than the 203,011 acre net loss during 2008, and is more reflective of the 157,000 acre decrease that was reported during the 2006 update. The San Joaquin Valley accounted for just over 50 percent of the net irrigated land decrease statewide in 2010. Land idling has been a major contributing factor to irrigated land decreases in recent updates, particularly in central and southern San Joaquin Valley counties. Net irrigated land decreases in the San Joaquin Valley totaled nearly 85,000 acres during the 2010 update, while the comparable figure was 130,000 acres for 2008 and 61,000 acres for 2006.
Concurrently, statewide urbanization declined during these update cycles, from 102,010 acres in 2006, to 72,548 acres in 2008, and 44,504 acres in the 2010 cycle. Irrigated land decreases due to land idling exceeded those due to urbanization during both the 2008 and 2010 updates.
27 In Kings County, dairies are included in the County’s Farmland of Local Importance category. Confined animal agriculture facilities that are not included in a county’s locally-important category are classified as Other Land. 28 http://articles.latimes.com/2013/mar/30/business/la-fi-california-dairies-20130330 and http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090607/A_BIZ/906070305/-1/rss01
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 25
Stanislaus 7,007 Merced 5,964Mendocino 868 Stanislaus 3,455San Luis Obispo 585 Madera 1,181Santa Barbara 377 San Luis Obispo 946Mariposa 238 Tehama 721Los Angeles 155 Monterey 476El Dorado 52 Santa Barbara 402Marin -2 Mendocino 399Amador -131 San Mateo 52Napa -175 Mariposa 9
TABLE 6: INCREASES OF IRRIGATED LAND RANKS
Net Increases of Irrigated LandTop Ten Counties - net acres
2006-2008 2008-2010
The Sacramento Valley region accounted for 20 percent of the statewide net irrigated land decreases, Southern California comprised 13 percent, and the North State region followed at 7 percent of the total. Land idling and ecological restoration had greater affects than urbanization in all but the Southern California region.
On a county basis, the predominance of land idling as a factor in conversion during the 2008 and 2010 updates is highlighted in Table 5. Southern San Joaquin Valley counties dominate the list, followed by counties that are either in proximity to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Sacramento, San Joaquin, Solano, and Yolo) or are high population growth inland counties (Riverside and San Bernardino). As discussed earlier in this report, a number of factors contribute to the changes seen in the Delta counties—ecological restoration, urbanization, gravel mining, and land idling. Imperial County had a relatively large number of land idling sites distributed throughout the Imperial and Palo Verde valleys.
Countervailing the net loss of irrigated farmland in most counties, a few locations saw net increases in their farmland totals during the 2010 update (Table 6 and Appendix Table C-3). These were clustered in the northern San Joaquin Valley: Merced, Stanislaus, and Madera counties each had net increases exceeding 1,000 acres. Merced County’s 5,964 acre irrigated land increase was characterized by large plantings of orchards, vineyards, and row crops in the lower foothills of the Sierra Nevada. A similar pattern occurred in Stanislaus County (net irrigated land increase of 3,455 acres), exemplified by a single orchard development of nearly four square miles north of the City of Oakdale. Coastal winegrowing counties (Mendocino, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara) comprised the remaining counties with net positive irrigated totals.
Fresno -59,620 Fresno -32,622Kings -24,527 Kern -25,137Kern -22,959 Kings -17,133San Joaquin -10,207 San Joaquin -11,777Tulare -9,893 Sacramento -11,483Riverside -8,648 Tulare -8,801Merced -8,165 Solano -5,835Yolo -7,340 Yolo -5,612Colusa -4,976 Riverside -5,609San Bernardino -4,637 Imperial -5,333
Net Losses of Irrigated Land
2006-2008 2008-2010Top Ten Counties - net acres
TABLE 5: DECREASES OF IRRIGATED LAND RANKS
California Department of Conservation
Page 26
1984-2010 Net Land Use Change
During the 13 biennial reporting cycles since FMMP was established, nearly 1.4 million acres of agricultural land in California were converted to nonagricultural purposes (Table 7). This represents an area larger in size than Merced County, or a rate of nearly one square mile every four days.
In total, 79 percent of this land was urbanized, 19 percent became one of the miscellaneous land uses grouped into the Other Land category, and just over 1 percent represents new water bodies.29
The largest losses from agricultural land categories have been from Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Grazing Land (662,297, 348,077, and 361,879 acres, respectively). Urbanization at the periphery of cities in California’s agricultural valleys led to the loss of Prime and Statewide Farmland, while grazing losses have been more prevalent in the coastal zone and interior Southern California. Unique Farmland registered a small net increase over the 26-year period (15,766 acres) due to expansion of high value crops—mostly orchards and vineyards—on hilly terrain.
The same data, shown graphically in Figure 13 (next page), illustrates trends in agricultural and urban conversion since 1984. Urbanization declined in the periods of recession—the early-to-mid-1990’s and the late 2000’s. Irrigated farmland acreage has decreased in almost every update cycle, most notably since the 2004. Dryland farming and grazing have frequently moved in the opposite direction of irrigated land, as multi-year hydrologic and economic factors influence how much land growers put into production.
29 Water body increases included Diamond Valley Lake, Lake Sonoma, and Los Vaqueros Reservoir (Riverside, Sonoma, and Contra Costa counties, respectively) and flooding of San Joaquin Delta islands for habitat (Contra Costa and Solano counties).
LAND USE CATEGORY 1984-1990 1990-1994 1994-1998 1998-2002 2002-2006 2006-2010Total
Change
Average Annual Change
Prime Farmland -54,957 -84,267 -70,928 -91,298 -159,822 -201,025 -662,297 -25,473
Farmland of Statewide Importance -13,242 -16,027 -47,566 -29,407 -97,783 -144,052 -348,077 -13,388
Unique Farmland 38,051 -23,141 26,093 32,804 -32,068 -25,973 15,766 606
Farmland of Local Importance -105,739 -5,661 15,848 -76,738 37,841 141,361 6,912 266
Irrigated Farmland (2) 4,412 -9,368 -13,899 -8,101 -5,620 0 -32,576 -1,253
Nonirrigated Farmland (2) 229 -1,051 -3,928 -6,198 -1,615 0 -12,563 -483
Total Important Farmland -131,246 -139,515 -94,380 -178,938 -259,067 -229,689 -1,032,835 -39,724
Grazing Land -140,167 -43,557 -45,557 -108,151 -87,929 63,482 -361,879 -13,918
Total Agricultural Land (Important Farmland + Grazing Land) -271,413 -183,072 -139,937 -287,089 -346,996 -166,207 -1,394,714 -53,643
Urban and Built-up Land 305,875 148,220 125,744 184,008 203,835 117,052 1,084,734 41,721
Other Land -41,210 32,874 13,304 97,377 141,432 47,079 290,856 11,187
Water 6,748 1,978 889 5,704 2,303 2,076 19,698 758
Total Area Inventoried For Change (3) 40.3 42.2 44.1 45.9 46.1 49.1
TABLE 7NET IMPORTANT FARMLAND CONVERSION 1984-2010 (1)
(1) Figures taken from the projectwide conversion summary in each of the California Farmland Conversion Reports, supplemented with data for the counties mapped on an 'interim' basis due to lack of modern soil surveys. Along with urbanization or changes in agricultural uses, the 'net land use change' data includes technical revisions made to the lists of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance by NRCS in various counties. Multiple update cycles have been grouped in this table for ease of reading.
(3) Total Area Inventoried increased as NRCS completed modern soil surveys and FMMP initiated mapping. Areas added include: 1986--central Siskiyou, Butte, Colusa; 1988--Kern, Sacramento, eastern San Mateo, Sutter, Tulare, Yuba; 1990--San Joaquin; 1992--western Merced; 1996--Lake, Butte Valley/Tulelake (covers eastern Siskiyou & western Modoc); 2000--western Stanislaus, western Fresno; 2004--northeastern Stanislaus; 2006--Mendocino County; 2008--Carrizo Plain area (San Luis Obispo County) & Adin area (Modoc County). This represents an increase of 62 percent in the project area between 1984 and 2010.
(2) Due to completion of NRCS soil surveys, the Interim mapping classes of Irrigated Farmland and Nonirrigated Farmland were no longer needed as of the 2004 data.
Acres (millions)
Acres
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 27
As 2012 mapping proceeds, the development of infrastructure to support the next generation of Californians is anticipated to impact its agricultural land resources. The Department of Conservation will continue to support informed planning decisions with timely and accurate agricultural land resource data, capturing these trends as they evolve.
‐250,000
‐200,000
‐150,000
‐100,000
‐50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
Dryland Agriculture Irrigated Farmland Urban Land
FIGURE 13: NET CHANGE IN URBAN LAND, IRRIGATED FARMLAND, AND DRYLAND AGRICULTURE 1984-2010
(acres
)
Page 28
Appendix A
2008 – 2010 County Conversion Tables
TA
BL
E A
-1
AL
AM
ED
A C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
3,9
58
3
,95
3
92
8
7
17
9
-5
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
10
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
1,2
90
1
,23
0
97
3
7
13
4
-60
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e7
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,44
1
2,3
83
1
22
6
4
18
6
-58
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
66
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
,68
9
7,5
66
3
11
1
88
4
99
-1
23
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
47
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
44
,25
2
24
4,0
33
6
41
4
22
1
,06
3
-21
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
3,1
15
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
25
1,9
41
2
51
,59
9
95
2
61
0
1,5
62
-3
42
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
3,3
62
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
46
,07
5
14
6,2
63
6
00
7
88
1
,38
8
18
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
73
,52
2
73
,59
5
48
1
55
4
1,0
35
7
3
Oth
er
La
nd
1,1
16
W
ate
r A
rea
53
,79
9
53
,88
0
0
81
8
1
81
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
25
,33
7
52
5,3
37
2
,03
3
2,0
33
4
,06
6
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
4,4
78
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
0
0
0
37
3
7
25
3
0
0
92
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
-
- 1
0
1
4
7
48
3
5
14
0
9
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:0
0
-
- 0
0
7
9
79
3
4
0
0
12
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
0
1
0
1
1
63
1
64
6
3
84
0
3
11
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:4
9
12
2
2
0
83
-
- 8
3
42
2
13
6
0
64
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
9
12
2
3
0
84
1
63
2
47
4
85
2
20
0
9
52
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
1)
to:
7
6
26
0
3
9
14
6
18
5
--
33
4
81
6
00
O
the
r L
an
dto
:3
1
19
1
5
0
65
1
13
1
78
3
03
-
- 0
4
81
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
87
3
7
64
0
1
88
4
22
6
10
7
88
5
54
8
1
2,0
33
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly t
he
re
sult
of
the
de
line
ati
on
of
La
ke E
liza
be
th in
Fre
mo
nt
Ce
ntr
al P
ark
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
AL
AM
ED
A C
OU
NT
Y
Page 29
TA
BL
E A
-2
AM
AD
OR
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
3,5
41
3
,21
1
33
8
8
34
6
-33
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
1,5
73
1
,42
1
15
8
6
16
4
-15
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
,67
8
3,3
35
3
59
1
6
37
5
-34
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
1,4
85
1
,86
4
75
4
54
5
29
3
79
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
10
,27
7
9,8
31
9
30
4
84
1
,41
4
-44
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
18
8,1
15
1
88
,43
3
41
4
73
2
1,1
46
3
18
G
razi
ng
La
nd
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
19
8,3
92
1
98
,26
4
1,3
44
1
,21
6
2,5
60
-1
28
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
8,1
95
8
,29
5
23
7
33
7
57
4
10
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
88
,46
3
88
,49
1
36
8
39
6
76
4
28
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
5,3
23
5
,32
3
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
30
0,3
73
3
00
,37
3
1,9
49
1
,94
9
3,8
98
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
2
13
8
14
0
14
9
28
9
4
45
0
3
38
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:2
-
- 1
1
1
14
1
39
1
53
0
5
0
1
58
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
3
2
--
27
3
2
26
0
29
2
0
67
0
3
59
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
1
6
--
7
68
7
5
0
0
0
75
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
3
9
1
76
1
93
6
16
8
09
4
1
17
0
9
30
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:2
3
7
2
72
2
84
-
- 2
84
2
3
10
7
0
41
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
6
1
6
44
8
47
7
61
6
1,0
93
2
7
22
4
0
1,3
44
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
1)
to:
0
0
0
3
3
62
6
5
--
17
2
0
23
7
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
1
0
0
3
4
54
5
8
31
0
--
0
36
8
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:8
6
1
6
45
4
48
4
73
2
1,2
16
3
37
3
96
0
1
,94
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
AM
AD
OR
CO
UN
TY
Page 30
TA
BL
E A
-3
BU
TT
E C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
19
4,6
89
1
93
,29
0
1,9
26
5
27
2
,45
3
-1,3
99
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e2
2,7
94
2
1,8
71
1
,13
6
21
3
1,3
49
-9
23
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
23
,07
8
22
,19
0
1,1
43
2
55
1
,39
8
-88
8
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
40
,56
1
23
7,3
51
4
,20
5
99
5
5,2
00
-3
,21
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
40
1,8
59
4
02
,99
9
87
3
2,0
13
2
,88
6
1,1
40
G
razi
ng
La
nd
4
61
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
64
2,4
20
6
40
,35
0
5,0
78
3
,00
8
8,0
86
-2
,07
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
61
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d4
5,3
50
4
5,9
14
2
04
7
68
9
72
5
64
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d3
62
,62
4
36
4,1
30
9
77
2
,48
3
3,4
60
1
,50
6
Oth
er
La
nd
0
Wa
ter
Are
a2
2,8
58
2
2,8
58
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,07
3,2
52
1
,07
3,2
52
6
,25
9
6,2
59
1
2,5
18
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D4
61
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
4
0
5
78
7
79
2
16
3
97
1
0
1,9
26
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:2
-
- 0
0
2
7
85
7
87
2
8
32
1
0
1,1
36
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
5
13
-
- 0
1
8
37
2
39
0
27
7
26
0
1
,14
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
1
4
4
0
25
1
,94
4
1,9
69
2
18
2
,01
8
0
4,2
05
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:1
70
1
65
1
27
0
4
62
-
- 4
62
1
03
3
08
0
8
73
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
17
7
17
9
13
1
0
48
7
1,9
44
2
,43
1
32
1
2,3
26
0
5
,07
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(1
)to
:2
7
10
1
0
3
8
9
47
-
- 1
57
0
2
04
O
the
r L
an
dto
:3
23
2
4
12
3
0
47
0
60
5
30
4
47
-
- 0
9
77
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
52
7
21
3
25
5
0
99
5
2,0
13
3
,00
8
76
8
2,4
83
0
6
,25
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f re
mo
vin
g t
he
Ko
op
ers
Ind
ust
rie
s w
oo
d t
rea
tme
nt
pla
nt,
Gri
dle
y In
du
stri
al P
ark
sit
e, a
nd
th
e h
isto
ric
co
mm
un
itie
s o
f F
ea
the
r F
alls
an
d O
role
ve.
BU
TT
E C
OU
NT
Y
Page 31
TA
BL
E A
-4
CO
LU
SA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
19
7,4
97
1
96
,32
0
1,5
37
3
60
1
,89
7
-1,1
77
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e2
,01
2
2,0
46
1
4
48
6
2
34
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
12
1,1
86
1
20
,31
6
1,4
35
5
65
2
,00
0
-87
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
23
5,0
23
2
36
,01
3
72
9
1,7
19
2
,44
8
99
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
55
,71
8
55
4,6
95
3
,71
5
2,6
92
6
,40
7
-1,0
23
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
9
,11
1
9,1
61
4
9
99
1
48
5
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
64
,82
9
56
3,8
56
3
,76
4
2,7
91
6
,55
5
-97
3
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d5
,11
1
5,1
42
2
6
57
8
3
31
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
68
,54
2
16
9,4
84
4
06
1
,34
8
1,7
54
9
42
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
1,9
11
1
,91
1
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
74
0,3
93
7
40
,39
3
4,1
96
4
,19
6
8,3
92
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 0
2
1
,25
2
1,2
54
0
1
,25
4
1
28
2
0
1,5
37
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
-
- 0
1
3
13
0
1
3
0
1
0
14
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
1
0
--
39
1
39
2
97
4
89
5
9
41
0
1
,43
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:2
60
4
8
25
9
--
56
7
1
56
8
37
1
24
0
7
29
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
61
4
8
26
1
1,6
56
2
,22
6
98
2
,32
4
43
1
,34
8
0
3,7
15
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:0
0
4
2
6
48
-
- 4
8
1
0
0
49
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
26
1
48
3
03
1
,66
2
2,2
74
9
8
2,3
72
4
4
1,3
48
0
3
,76
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
4
0
1
20
2
5
1
26
-
- 0
0
2
6
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
95
0
2
61
3
7
39
3
0
39
3
13
-
- 0
4
06
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
36
0
48
5
65
1
,71
9
2,6
92
9
9
2,7
91
5
7
1,3
48
0
4
,19
6
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.
CO
LU
SA
CO
UN
TY
Page 32
TA
BL
E A
-5
CO
NT
RA
CO
ST
A C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
26
,78
9
26
,48
4
1,0
88
7
83
1
,87
1
-30
5
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
46
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
7,5
55
7
,42
0
26
9
13
4
40
3
-13
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
94
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
3,1
25
3
,20
5
14
2
22
2
36
4
80
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
30
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
53
,44
9
53
,03
9
1,8
57
1
,44
7
3,3
04
-4
10
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
89
4
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
90
,91
8
90
,14
8
3,3
56
2
,58
6
5,9
42
-7
70
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,48
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
16
8,9
04
1
68
,64
6
56
3
30
5
86
8
-25
8
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
54
5
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
59
,82
2
25
8,7
94
3
,91
9
2,8
91
6
,81
0
-1,0
28
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,0
28
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
51
,33
6
15
1,9
65
6
51
1
,28
0
1,9
31
6
29
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d4
9,0
98
4
9,4
97
5
91
9
90
1
,58
1
39
9
Oth
er
La
nd
78
4
Wa
ter
Are
a5
3,7
64
5
3,7
64
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
14
,02
0
51
4,0
20
5
,16
1
5,1
61
1
0,3
22
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D2
,81
2
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
29
7
13
7
42
2
2
76
4
93
2
31
0
1
,08
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
4
--
1
18
6
19
1
10
2
01
3
8
30
0
2
69
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
1
0
--
80
8
1
18
9
9
16
2
7
0
14
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:7
15
8
5
15
6
--
95
6
0
95
6
51
3
38
8
0
1,8
57
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
20
8
5
18
6
97
9
1,9
70
5
0
2,0
20
6
60
6
76
0
3
,35
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
3
0
23
2
59
2
85
-
- 2
85
2
16
6
2
0
56
3
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
23
8
5
20
9
1,2
38
2
,25
5
50
2
,30
5
87
6
73
8
0
3,9
19
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
1)
to:
10
2
7
0
11
7
15
4
24
5
39
9
--
25
2
0
65
1
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
50
2
2
13
9
2
17
7
10
1
87
4
04
-
- 0
5
91
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
78
3
13
4
22
2
1,4
47
2
,58
6
30
5
2,8
91
1
,28
0
99
0
0
5,1
61
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
ck
of
suff
icie
nt
infr
ast
ruc
ture
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
CO
NT
RA
CO
ST
A C
OU
NT
Y
Page 33
TA
BL
E A
-6
EL
DO
RA
DO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
77
1
66
1
11
4
4
11
8
-11
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
92
1
82
7
11
5
21
1
36
-9
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
,76
6
3,2
06
6
20
6
0
68
0
-56
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
59
,64
8
59
,56
5
73
3
65
0
1,3
83
-8
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L6
5,1
06
6
4,2
59
1
,58
2
73
5
2,3
17
-8
47
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
94
,77
8
19
3,8
83
1
,21
1
31
6
1,5
27
-8
95
G
razi
ng
La
nd
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
25
9,8
84
2
58
,14
2
2,7
93
1
,05
1
3,8
44
-1
,74
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
2,1
94
3
2,2
69
3
34
4
09
7
43
7
5
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
23
7,5
07
2
39
,02
0
55
1
2,0
64
2
,61
5
1,5
13
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
6,8
19
6
,97
3
0
15
4
15
4
15
4
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
53
6,4
04
5
36
,40
4
3,6
78
3
,67
8
7,3
56
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
1
11
1
11
2
1
11
3
1
0
0
11
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
1
11
3
11
4
1
11
5
0
0
0
11
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:1
0
-
- 3
81
3
82
1
63
5
45
5
7
0
0
62
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:3
2
1
19
-
- 4
3
14
5
7
38
6
38
0
7
33
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
2
1
21
6
05
6
51
1
79
8
30
4
4
70
8
0
1,5
82
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(1
)to
:0
0
3
4
5
39
-
- 3
9
72
1
,10
0
0
1,2
11
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4
21
5
5
61
0
69
0
17
9
86
9
11
6
1,8
08
0
2
,79
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:0
0
1
2
6
27
5
1
78
-
- 2
56
0
3
34
O
the
r L
an
d (
3)
to:
0
0
4
14
1
8
86
1
04
2
93
-
- 1
54
5
51
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
4
21
6
0
65
0
73
5
31
6
1,0
51
4
09
2
,06
4
15
4
3,6
78
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Oth
er
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
use
of
hig
h r
eso
luti
on
ima
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te lo
w d
en
sity
ho
usi
ng
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly t
he
re
sult
of
the
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Wa
ter
is d
ue
to
th
e u
se o
f h
igh
re
solu
tio
n im
ag
ery
to
mo
re a
cc
ura
tely
de
line
ate
th
e b
ou
nd
ary
of
Jen
kin
son
La
ke.
EL
DO
RA
DO
CO
UN
TY
Page 34
TA
BL
E A
-7
FR
ES
NO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
69
3,1
74
6
85
,41
1
11
,05
2
3,2
89
1
4,3
41
-7
,76
3
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
1,5
20
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
39
,02
0
41
5,6
89
2
4,7
76
1
,44
5
26
,22
1
-23
,33
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
41
1
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d9
4,1
77
9
2,6
49
2
,06
5
53
7
2,6
02
-1
,52
8
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
42
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
14
9,9
07
1
76
,52
4
7,9
63
3
4,5
80
4
2,5
43
2
6,6
17
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
80
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,3
76
,27
8
1,3
70
,27
3
45
,85
6
39
,85
1
85
,70
7
-6,0
05
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,97
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
82
6,9
53
8
25
,75
2
1,4
23
2
22
1
,64
5
-1,2
01
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
,51
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,20
3,2
31
2
,19
6,0
25
4
7,2
79
4
0,0
73
8
7,3
52
-7
,20
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
,48
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
11
7,5
67
1
20
,75
3
39
9
3,5
85
3
,98
4
3,1
86
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
11
,70
2
11
5,7
22
2
,20
8
6,2
28
8
,43
6
4,0
20
O
the
r L
an
d2
11
W
ate
r A
rea
4,9
14
4
,91
4
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
2,4
37
,41
4
2,4
37
,41
4
49
,88
6
49
,88
6
99
,77
2
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
5,6
95
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(3
)to
: -
- 1
6
21
8
,94
6
8,9
83
4
5
9,0
28
8
20
1
,20
4
0
11
,05
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:2
6
--
11
2
3,7
10
2
3,7
47
2
9
23
,77
6
32
2
67
8
0
24
,77
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
13
9
-
- 1
,56
8
1,5
90
3
5
1,6
25
2
37
2
03
0
2
,06
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
2)(
3)
to:
2,7
36
1
,02
1
31
5
--
4,0
72
2
9
4,1
01
1
,04
7
2,8
15
0
7
,96
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,7
75
1
,04
6
34
7
34
,22
4
38
,39
2
13
8
38
,53
0
2,4
26
4
,90
0
0
45
,85
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
3)
to:
10
0
14
3
4
11
2
26
0
--
26
0
18
1
,14
5
0
1,4
23
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,8
75
1
,06
0
38
1
34
,33
6
38
,65
2
13
8
38
,79
0
2,4
44
6
,04
5
0
47
,27
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(4
)to
:7
7
44
1
2
83
2
16
0
2
16
-
- 1
83
0
3
99
O
the
r L
an
dto
:3
37
3
41
1
44
1
61
9
83
8
4
1,0
67
1
,14
1
--
0
2,2
08
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
3,2
89
1
,44
5
53
7
34
,58
0
39
,85
1
22
2
40
,07
3
3,5
85
6
,22
8
0
49
,88
6
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le o
r la
nd
use
d f
or
dry
lan
d g
rain
pro
du
cti
on
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o ir
rig
ate
d f
arm
lan
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f ir
rig
ate
d r
ow
cro
ps.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s th
at
ha
s b
ee
n g
rad
ed
fo
r d
eve
lop
me
nt,
ne
w a
gri
cu
ltu
ral p
roc
ess
ing
fa
cili
tie
s, a
nd
low
de
nsi
ty h
ou
sin
g.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
FR
ES
NO
CO
UN
TY
Page 35
TA
BL
E A
-08
GL
EN
N C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
15
9,8
11
1
57
,94
0
3,5
76
1
,70
5
5,2
81
-1
,87
1
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
68
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
87
,49
7
87
,07
1
1,2
44
8
18
2
,06
2
-42
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
21
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
7,3
06
1
7,3
00
1
,00
7
1,0
01
2
,00
8
-6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d9
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e8
3,5
44
8
5,8
36
3
,44
6
5,7
38
9
,18
4
2,2
92
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
1,0
01
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
48
,15
8
34
8,1
47
9
,27
3
9,2
62
1
8,5
35
-1
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,0
00
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
27
,39
1
22
6,8
37
1
,58
7
1,0
33
2
,62
0
-55
4
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
75
,54
9
57
4,9
84
1
0,8
60
1
0,2
95
2
1,1
55
-5
65
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,0
02
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d6
,37
2
6,4
20
1
23
1
71
2
94
4
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
26
1,2
58
2
61
,77
5
1,0
87
1
,60
4
2,6
91
5
17
O
the
r L
an
d6
82
W
ate
r A
rea
5,9
50
5
,95
0
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
84
9,1
29
8
49
,12
9
12
,07
0
12
,07
0
24
,14
0
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
2,6
84
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 7
6
6
2,8
88
2
,96
1
6
2,9
67
2
6
58
3
0
3,5
76
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
2)
to:
8
--
8
1,0
56
1
,07
2
3
1,0
75
1
5
15
4
0
1,2
44
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
10
7
-
- 4
34
4
51
2
26
6
77
9
3
21
0
1
,00
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
3)
to:
1,4
27
6
89
3
36
-
- 2
,45
2
58
3
3,0
35
3
8
37
3
0
3,4
46
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,44
5
70
3
41
0
4,3
78
6
,93
6
81
8
7,7
54
8
8
1,4
31
0
9
,27
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
2
1
49
9
92
4
1,4
26
-
- 1
,42
6
6
15
5
0
1,5
87
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,4
47
7
04
9
09
5
,30
2
8,3
62
8
18
9
,18
0
94
1
,58
6
0
10
,86
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(4
)to
:5
8
14
3
3
0
10
5
0
10
5
--
18
0
1
23
O
the
r L
an
dto
:2
00
1
00
8
9
40
6
79
5
21
5
1,0
10
7
7
--
0
1,0
87
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
1,7
05
8
18
1
,00
1
5,7
38
9
,26
2
1,0
33
1
0,2
95
1
71
1
,60
4
0
12
,07
0
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
is d
ue
to
th
e d
elin
ea
tio
n o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
orc
ha
rds
ne
ar
Orl
an
d.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le o
r la
nd
use
d f
or
dry
lan
d g
rain
pro
du
cti
on
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les
an
d t
he
de
line
ati
on
of
ha
bit
at
rest
ora
tio
n a
rea
s a
lon
g t
he
Sa
cra
me
nto
Riv
er.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d is
du
e t
o n
ew
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
, pri
ma
rily
in t
he
Sa
cra
me
nto
Va
lley
are
a.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
wa
ter
ho
ldin
g p
on
ds
at
the
fo
rme
r H
olly
Su
ga
r P
lan
t in
Ha
milt
on
Cit
y b
ein
g f
ille
d in
an
d p
lan
ted
wit
h o
rch
ard
s.
GL
EN
N C
OU
NT
Y
Page 36
TA
BL
E A
-9
IMP
ER
IAL
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
19
5,5
88
1
94
,13
7
1,8
65
4
14
2
,27
9
-1,4
51
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e3
11
,04
7
30
7,2
21
4
,57
9
75
3
5,3
32
-3
,82
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,19
7
2,1
41
6
5
9
74
-5
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
32
,10
9
35
,77
4
1,6
64
5
,32
9
6,9
93
3
,66
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
40
,94
1
53
9,2
73
8
,17
3
6,5
05
1
4,6
78
-1
,66
8
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
40
,94
1
53
9,2
73
8
,17
3
6,5
05
1
4,6
78
-1
,66
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d2
7,7
09
2
8,4
85
8
3
85
9
94
2
77
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
45
8,8
29
4
60
,00
1
33
8
1,5
10
1
,84
8
1,1
72
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
1,0
29
7
49
2
93
1
3
30
6
-28
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,0
28
,50
8
1,0
28
,50
8
8,8
87
8
,88
7
17
,77
4
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 6
1
1
,42
6
1,4
33
0
1
,43
3
76
3
56
0
1
,86
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:2
-
- 0
3
,87
0
3,8
72
0
3
,87
2
21
2
49
5
0
4,5
79
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
1
0
--
0
1
0
1
0
64
0
6
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:3
40
6
64
0
-
- 1
,00
4
0
1,0
04
4
23
2
37
0
1
,66
4
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
34
3
67
0
1
5,2
96
6
,31
0
0
6,3
10
7
11
1
,15
2
0
8,1
73
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
34
3
67
0
1
5,2
96
6
,31
0
0
6,3
10
7
11
1
,15
2
0
8,1
73
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
2)
to:
5
3
0
10
1
8
0
18
-
- 6
5
0
83
O
the
r L
an
dto
:6
6
80
8
2
3
17
7
0
17
7
14
8
--
13
3
38
W
ate
r A
rea
(3
)to
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
93
-
- 2
93
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:4
14
7
53
9
5
,32
9
6,5
05
0
6
,50
5
85
9
1,5
10
1
3
8,8
87
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d f
allo
win
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o r
ec
lass
ifyi
ng
ab
an
do
ne
d w
ate
r c
on
tro
l po
nd
s n
ea
r B
raw
ley
(3)
De
cre
ase
in W
ate
r a
rea
du
e t
o im
pro
vem
en
ts m
ad
e t
o t
he
Sa
lto
n S
ea
bo
un
da
ry.
IMP
ER
IAL
CO
UN
TY
Page 37
TA
BL
E A
-10
KE
RN
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
62
6,2
17
6
08
,78
9
19
,58
3
2,1
55
2
1,7
38
-1
7,4
28
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d1
,94
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
21
6,3
47
2
13
,46
5
3,9
57
1
,07
5
5,0
32
-2
,88
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
59
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
96
,65
7
91
,83
0
5,2
13
3
86
5
,59
9
-4,8
27
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
93
9,2
21
9
14
,08
4
28
,75
3
3,6
16
3
2,3
69
-2
5,1
37
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,00
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,8
07
,06
9
1,8
27
,39
1
4,1
13
2
4,4
35
2
8,5
48
2
0,3
22
G
razi
ng
La
nd
7
39
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,7
46
,29
0
2,7
41
,47
5
32
,86
6
28
,05
1
60
,91
7
-4,8
15
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,7
46
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
38
,69
6
14
1,8
99
2
60
3
,46
3
3,7
23
3
,20
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
2,3
29
,39
6
2,3
30
,99
8
2,7
09
4
,31
1
7,0
20
1
,60
2
Oth
er
La
nd
54
2
Wa
ter
Are
a9
,88
0
9,8
90
1
1
1
12
1
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
5,2
24
,26
2
5,2
24
,26
2
35
,83
6
35
,83
6
71
,67
2
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
3,2
88
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
3
11
0
1
4
15
,69
6
15
,71
0
1,4
41
2
,43
1
1
19
,58
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
12
0
1
2
3,4
56
3
,46
8
13
3
35
6
0
3,9
57
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
3
2
--
0
5
4,9
32
4
,93
7
91
1
85
0
5
,21
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
5
2
3
0
31
2
4,0
84
2
4,1
15
1
,66
5
2,9
72
1
2
8,7
53
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:1
,32
3
67
7
30
3
0
2,3
03
-
- 2
,30
3
68
6
1,1
14
1
0
4,1
13
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,3
26
6
82
3
26
0
2
,33
4
24
,08
4
26
,41
8
2,3
51
4
,08
6
11
3
2,8
66
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:3
1
0
0
4
3
1
35
-
- 2
25
0
2
60
O
the
r L
an
dto
:8
26
3
92
6
0
0
1,2
78
3
19
1
,59
7
1,1
12
-
- 0
2
,70
9
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
-
- 1
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:2
,15
5
1,0
75
3
86
0
3
,61
6
24
,43
5
28
,05
1
3,4
63
4
,31
1
11
3
5,8
36
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le o
r la
nd
use
d f
or
dry
lan
d g
rain
pro
du
cti
on
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s th
at
ha
s b
ee
n g
rad
ed
fo
r d
eve
lop
me
nt
pri
ma
rily
in t
he
Ba
kers
fie
ld a
rea
, th
e e
xpa
nsi
on
of
oil
ext
rac
tio
n
in t
he
Lo
st a
nd
Elk
Hill
s a
rea
s, a
nd
th
e d
elin
ea
tio
n o
f lo
w d
en
sit y
ho
usi
ng
, fa
rmst
ea
ds,
an
d r
ura
l co
mm
erc
ial.
(3
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
is d
ue
to
ne
w ir
rig
ate
d f
arm
lan
d, p
rim
ari
ly r
ow
or
fie
ld c
rop
s in
th
e A
nte
lop
e P
lain
are
a a
nd
orc
ha
rds
in t
he
Ma
ric
op
a F
lat
are
a.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
(5
) A
pp
roxi
ma
tely
1,5
00
ac
res
of
the
co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d is
du
e t
o c
on
stru
cti
on
of
wa
ter
co
ntr
ol f
ac
iliti
es,
fo
r st
ora
ge
or
dra
ina
ge
. F
MM
P m
ain
tain
s a
se
pa
rate
d
ata
laye
r o
f w
ate
r c
on
tro
l fa
cili
tie
s w
hic
h is
ava
ilab
le f
or
use
r a
dju
stm
en
ts.
KE
RN
CO
UN
TY
Page 38
TA
BL
E A
-11
KIN
GS
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
13
8,0
89
1
30
,25
7
8,3
27
4
95
8
,82
2
-7,8
32
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d2
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
39
7,0
65
3
88
,89
1
11
,18
3
3,0
09
1
4,1
92
-8
,17
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
2,9
28
2
1,8
01
1
,79
2
66
5
2,4
57
-1
,12
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
10
,02
2
11
,13
8
15
6
1,2
72
1
,42
8
1,1
16
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
56
8,1
04
5
52
,08
7
21
,45
8
5,4
41
2
6,8
99
-1
6,0
17
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
25
7,7
46
2
71
,83
1
4,6
10
1
8,6
95
2
3,3
05
1
4,0
85
G
razi
ng
La
nd
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
82
5,8
50
8
23
,91
8
26
,06
8
24
,13
6
50
,20
4
-1,9
32
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
27
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
2,2
20
3
5,8
47
5
6
3,6
83
3
,73
9
3,6
27
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d3
2,6
54
3
0,9
59
2
,44
5
75
0
3,1
95
-1
,69
5
Oth
er
La
nd
0
Wa
ter
Are
a6
2
62
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
8
90
,78
6
89
0,7
86
2
8,5
69
2
8,5
69
5
7,1
38
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D2
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
d (
4)
La
nd
Are
aA
no
the
r U
seP
rim
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
--
1
0
56
5
7
7,7
09
7
,76
6
34
7
21
4
0
8,3
27
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
1
--
15
7
09
7
25
9
,48
4
10
,20
9
71
1
26
3
0
11
,18
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
3
31
-
- 2
40
2
74
1
,47
7
1,7
51
2
3
9
0
1,7
92
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
21
4
0
19
-
- 8
0
1
81
2
2
53
0
1
56
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
5
72
3
4
1,0
05
1
,13
6
18
,67
1
19
,80
7
1,0
82
5
69
0
2
1,4
58
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(2
)to
:4
21
2
,70
1
61
8
21
6
3,9
56
-
- 3
,95
6
47
3
18
1
0
4,6
10
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
44
6
2,7
73
6
52
1
,22
1
5,0
92
1
8,6
71
2
3,7
63
1
,55
5
75
0
0
26
,06
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(3
)to
:0
5
6
0
0
56
0
5
6
--
0
0
56
O
the
r L
an
dto
:4
9
18
0
13
5
1
29
3
24
3
17
2
,12
8
--
0
2,4
45
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
49
5
3,0
09
6
65
1
,27
2
5,4
41
1
8,6
95
2
4,1
36
3
,68
3
75
0
0
28
,56
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
or
lan
d u
sed
fo
r d
ryla
nd
gra
in p
rod
uc
tio
n f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
is d
ue
to
ne
wly
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
, pri
ma
rily
in t
he
Sa
n J
oa
qu
in V
alle
y a
nd
th
e K
ett
lem
an
Pla
in.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e is
du
e t
o a
n a
rea
of
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
on
a f
orm
erl
y va
ca
nt
lot
ne
xt t
o t
he
wa
ter
tre
atm
en
t p
lan
t in
Ha
nfo
rd.
(4)
Ap
pro
xim
ate
ly 3
,10
0 a
cre
s o
f th
e c
on
vers
ion
to
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is d
ue
to
co
nst
ruc
tio
n o
f w
ate
r c
on
tro
l fa
cili
tie
s, f
or
sto
rag
e o
r d
rain
ag
e.
FM
MP
ma
inta
ins
a s
ep
ara
te d
ata
laye
r o
f w
ate
r c
on
tro
l fa
cili
tie
s w
hic
h is
ava
ilab
le f
or
use
r a
dju
stm
en
ts.
KIN
GS
CO
UN
TY
Page 39
TA
BL
E A
-12
LA
KE
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
13
,63
6
11
,60
3
2,1
94
1
61
2
,35
5
-2,0
33
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
,09
9
84
7
26
4
12
2
76
-2
52
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
11
,77
2
11
,08
3
99
5
30
6
1,3
01
-6
89
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e2
1,0
12
2
2,3
93
7
36
2
,11
7
2,8
53
1
,38
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
7,5
19
4
5,9
26
4
,18
9
2,5
96
6
,78
5
-1,5
93
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
39
,76
5
23
9,8
73
7
93
9
01
1
,69
4
10
8
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
87
,28
4
28
5,7
99
4
,98
2
3,4
97
8
,47
9
-1,4
85
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
15
,12
6
15
,68
8
79
6
41
7
20
5
62
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d5
01
,63
6
50
2,5
59
3
43
1
,26
6
1,6
09
9
23
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
46
,79
3
46
,79
3
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
85
0,8
39
8
50
,83
9
5,4
04
5
,40
4
10
,80
8
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 0
2
2
1,7
68
1
,79
0
8
1,7
98
4
5
35
1
0
2,1
94
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:1
-
- 0
2
46
2
47
1
2
48
0
1
6
0
26
4
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:2
1
2
--
59
8
2
67
3
75
5
25
2
15
0
9
95
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
12
2
9
4
--
13
5
17
5
31
0
17
9
24
7
0
73
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
14
4
11
2
6
2,0
73
2
,25
4
85
7
3,1
11
2
49
8
29
0
4
,18
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
1
0
26
1
17
2
79
-
- 2
79
1
15
3
99
0
7
93
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
14
5
11
2
87
2
,09
0
2,5
33
8
57
3
,39
0
36
4
1,2
28
0
4
,98
2
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
2
0
1
15
1
8
23
4
1
--
38
0
7
9
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
14
1
1
8
12
4
5
21
6
6
27
7
--
0
34
3
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:1
61
1
2
30
6
2,1
17
2
,59
6
90
1
3,4
97
6
41
1
,26
6
0
5,4
04
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
LA
KE
CO
UN
TY
Page 40
TA
BL
E A
-13
LO
S A
NG
EL
ES
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
32
40
6
30
87
6
24
22
8
92
3
31
4
-15
30
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d4
4
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
32
,40
6
30
,87
6
2,4
22
8
92
3
,31
4
-1,5
30
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d4
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Im
po
rta
nc
e1
,22
8
95
2
28
6
10
2
96
-2
76
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
,17
7
1,1
29
1
01
5
3
15
4
-48
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e7
,19
3
6,8
55
4
12
7
4
48
6
-33
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
2,0
04
3
9,8
12
3
,22
1
1,0
29
4
,25
0
-2,1
92
I
MP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
44
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
29
,47
4
23
1,4
75
1
,04
8
3,0
49
4
,09
7
2,0
01
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
,21
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
71
,47
8
27
1,2
87
4
,26
9
4,0
78
8
,34
7
-19
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,25
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
17
0,8
64
1
74
,88
8
27
0
4,2
94
4
,56
4
4,0
24
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
p
,,
,,
,p
Oth
er
La
nd
67
8,2
51
6
74
,56
8
4,5
50
8
67
5
,41
7
-3,6
83
O
the
r L
an
d7
,49
2
Wa
ter
Are
a3
,46
8
3,3
18
1
50
0
1
50
-1
50
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A I
NV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,1
24
,06
1
1,1
24
,06
1
9,2
39
9
,23
9
18
,47
8
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
9,7
48
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lF
arm
lan
d o
fF
arm
lan
d o
fS
ub
tota
lT
ota
lU
rba
n a
nd
To
tal
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YP
rim
eS
tate
wid
eU
niq
ue
Lo
ca
lIm
po
rta
nt
Gra
zin
gA
gri
cu
ltu
ral
Bu
ilt-u
pO
the
rW
ate
rC
on
vert
ed
To
Fa
rmla
nd
Imp
ort
an
ce
Fa
rmla
nd
Imp
ort
an
ce
Fa
rmla
nd
La
nd
La
nd
La
nd
La
nd
Are
aA
no
the
r U
seP
rim
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
--
1
16
5
2
69
2
,14
1
2,2
10
4
6
16
6
0
2,4
22
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
0
0
0
27
7
27
7
0
9
0
28
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:2
0
-
- 0
2
8
5
87
4
1
0
0
10
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:8
0
0
-
- 8
4
04
4
12
0
0
0
4
12
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
0
1
16
5
2
79
2
,90
7
2,9
86
5
0
18
5
0
3,2
21
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:8
5
1
1
22
1
09
-
- 1
09
5
07
4
32
0
1
,04
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L9
5
2
17
7
4
18
8
2,9
07
3
,09
5
55
7
61
7
0
4,2
69
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:2
7
0
24
0
5
1
11
9
17
0
--
10
0
0
27
0
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
77
0
8
12
0
7
90
2
3
81
3
3,7
37
-
- 0
4
,55
0
Wa
ter
Are
a (
3)
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
--
15
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
89
2
10
5
3
74
1
,02
9
3,0
49
4
,07
8
4,2
94
8
67
0
9
,23
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f c
losi
ng
th
e C
asc
ad
es
Go
lf C
ou
rse
in S
ylm
ar
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f c
losi
ng
th
e C
asc
ad
es
Go
lf C
ou
rse
in S
ylm
ar,
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es
in t
he
Sa
nta
Mo
nic
a m
ou
nta
ins,
an
d t
o a
min
ing
op
era
tio
n n
ea
r P
alm
da
le.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Wa
ter
du
e t
o t
he
ab
an
do
nm
en
t o
f F
air
mo
nt
Re
serv
oir
be
ca
use
it w
as
de
em
ed
se
ism
ica
lly u
nso
un
d a
nd
will
no
t b
e r
efi
lled
as
a r
esu
lt o
f th
e 1
97
1 S
ylm
ar
ea
rth
qu
ak
e.
LO
S A
NG
EL
ES
CO
UN
TY
Page 41
TA
BL
E A
-14
MA
DE
RA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
97
,49
1
97
,09
5
1,7
63
1
,36
7
3,1
30
-3
96
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d1
06
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e8
5,1
36
8
4,7
55
8
76
4
95
1
,37
1
-38
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
16
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
16
3,9
73
1
65
,93
1
1,6
05
3
,56
3
5,1
68
1
,95
8
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e1
6,1
43
1
3,8
01
3
,17
8
83
6
4,0
14
-2
,34
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e5
04
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
62
,74
3
36
1,5
82
7
,42
2
6,2
61
1
3,6
83
-1
,16
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
64
5
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
39
9,5
01
4
00
,60
4
3,1
11
4
,21
4
7,3
25
1
,10
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
3,7
02
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
76
2,2
44
7
62
,18
6
10
,53
3
10
,47
5
21
,00
8
-58
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4,3
47
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d2
7,0
10
2
7,2
14
4
9
25
3
30
2
20
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
65
,73
4
65
,58
8
1,0
71
9
25
1
,99
6
-14
6
Oth
er
La
nd
47
2
Wa
ter
Are
a6
,05
5
6,0
55
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
8
61
,04
3
86
1,0
43
1
1,6
53
1
1,6
53
2
3,3
06
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D4
,81
9
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 7
6
1
1
4
1,3
88
1
,40
2
58
3
03
0
1
,76
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
9
--
3
0
12
7
36
7
48
4
1
87
0
8
76
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
:1
6
2
--
34
5
2
1,1
79
1
,23
1
15
3
59
0
1
,60
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
2)
to:
80
2
30
3
1,1
87
-
- 2
,29
2
86
0
3,1
52
4
2
2
0
3,1
78
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L8
27
3
12
1
,19
6
35
2
,37
0
4,1
63
6
,53
3
11
8
77
1
0
7,4
22
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(2
)to
:3
67
1
3
1,7
65
7
63
2
,90
8
--
2,9
08
5
4
14
9
0
3,1
11
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,1
94
3
25
2
,96
1
79
8
5,2
78
4
,16
3
9,4
41
1
72
9
20
0
1
0,5
33
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:7
7
4
0
1
8
26
4
4
--
5
0
49
O
the
r L
an
d (
2)
to:
16
6
16
3
59
8
38
9
65
2
5
99
0
81
-
- 0
1
,07
1
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:1
,36
7
49
5
3,5
63
8
36
6
,26
1
4,2
14
1
0,4
75
2
53
9
25
0
1
1,6
53
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
ca
teg
ori
es
is d
ue
to
ne
wly
irri
ga
ted
orc
ha
rds
an
d o
the
r c
rop
s. T
he
se c
on
vers
ion
s a
re p
rim
ari
ly lo
ca
ted
ne
ar
the
inte
rse
cti
on
of
Ave
nu
e 1
5 a
nd
Sa
nta
Fe
Ro
ad
.
MA
DE
RA
CO
UN
TY
Page 42
TA
BL
E A
-15
MA
RIN
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
7
0
7
0
7
-7
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
46
1
23
3
24
2
14
2
56
-2
28
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
29
9
28
7
48
3
6
84
-1
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
65
,15
4
63
,29
7
2,4
93
6
36
3
,12
9
-1,8
57
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
65
,92
1
63
,81
7
2,7
90
6
86
3
,47
6
-2,1
04
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
8
9,5
56
8
9,2
56
4
,09
1
3,7
91
7
,88
2
-30
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
55
,47
7
15
3,0
73
6
,88
1
4,4
77
1
1,3
58
-2
,40
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d4
2,1
81
4
2,3
41
9
3
25
3
34
6
16
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
13
6,1
85
1
38
,42
9
4,1
95
6
,43
9
10
,63
4
2,2
44
O
the
r L
an
d1
7
Wa
ter
Are
a4
4,8
19
4
4,8
19
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
3
78
,66
2
37
8,6
62
1
1,1
69
1
1,1
69
2
2,3
38
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
0
60
6
0
0
60
0
1
82
0
2
42
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
0
0
--
17
1
7
20
3
7
2
9
0
48
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:0
1
2
2
--
14
2
56
2
70
1
6
2,2
07
0
2
,49
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
12
2
7
7
91
2
76
3
67
2
5
2,3
98
0
2
,79
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
1)
to:
0
1
33
9
5
12
9
--
12
9
12
3
,95
0
0
4,0
91
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
13
3
5
17
2
22
0
27
6
49
6
37
6
,34
8
0
6,8
81
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
2)
to:
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
--
91
0
9
3
Oth
er
La
nd
(1
)to
:0
1
1
4
62
4
64
3
,51
5
3,9
79
2
16
-
- 0
4
,19
5
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:0
1
4
36
6
36
6
86
3
,79
1
4,4
77
2
53
6
,43
9
0
11
,16
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
ns
be
twe
en
Gra
zin
g L
an
d, F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
, an
d O
the
r L
an
d d
ue
to
th
e u
pd
ati
ng
of
gra
zin
g le
ase
bo
un
da
rie
s w
ith
in t
he
Po
int
Re
yes
Na
tio
na
l Se
ash
ore
an
d t
he
Go
lde
n G
ate
Na
tio
na
l Re
cre
ati
on
Are
a.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
ns
to O
the
r L
an
d d
ue
to
th
e u
se o
f h
igh
re
solu
tio
n im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
MA
RIN
CO
UN
TY
Page 43
TA
BL
E A
-16
MA
RIP
OS
A C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
6
6
0
0
0
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
41
4
9
0
8
8
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
84
2
85
9
1
0
19
1
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
33
1
34
0
9
18
2
7
9
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
40
3,7
69
4
03
,60
2
19
1
24
2
15
-1
67
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
,33
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
04
,10
0
40
3,9
42
2
00
4
2
24
2
-15
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,33
1
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
2,4
23
2
,44
0
0
17
1
7
17
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d7
5,8
74
7
6,0
15
3
8
17
9
21
7
14
1
Oth
er
La
nd
16
2
Wa
ter
Are
a6
,04
7
6,0
47
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
4
88
,44
4
48
8,4
44
2
38
2
38
4
76
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
,49
3
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:0
0
-
- 0
0
9
9
0
0
0
9
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
0
5
6
0
11
-
- 1
1
1
17
9
0
19
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
5
6
0
1
1
9
20
1
1
79
0
2
00
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
O
the
r L
an
dto
:0
3
4
0
7
1
5
22
1
6
--
0
38
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
0
8
10
0
1
8
24
4
2
17
1
79
0
2
38
MA
RIP
OS
A C
OU
NT
Y
Page 44
TA
BL
E A
-17
ME
ND
OC
INO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
21
,10
7
21
,34
6
17
5
41
4
58
9
23
9
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
1,3
65
1
,37
4
11
2
0
31
9
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
7,2
19
7
,37
0
11
3
26
4
37
7
15
1
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
9,6
91
3
0,0
90
2
99
6
98
9
97
3
99
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
,92
7,0
16
1
,92
5,8
03
1
,59
7
38
4
1,9
81
-1
,21
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,95
6,7
07
1
,95
5,8
93
1
,89
6
1,0
82
2
,97
8
-81
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
9,1
94
1
9,4
55
1
3
27
4
28
7
26
1
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
66
,80
8
67
,36
1
32
5
87
8
1,2
03
5
53
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
2,1
35
2
,13
5
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
2,0
44
,84
4
2,0
44
,84
4
2,2
34
2
,23
4
4,4
68
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
3
0
4
61
6
5
19
9
1
0
17
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
3
0
3
4
7
3
1
0
11
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
5
0
--
0
5
60
6
5
21
2
7
0
11
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
1
6
0
1
2
12
5
13
7
43
1
19
0
2
99
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:3
91
1
7
24
7
0
65
5
--
65
5
18
6
75
6
0
1,5
97
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
39
6
18
2
53
0
6
67
1
25
7
92
2
29
8
75
0
1
,89
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
4
1
2
0
7
3
10
-
- 3
0
1
3
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
14
1
9
0
2
4
25
6
28
0
45
-
- 0
3
25
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
41
4
20
2
64
0
6
98
3
84
1
,08
2
27
4
87
8
0
2,2
34
ME
ND
OC
INO
CO
UN
TY
Page 45
TA
BL
E A
-18
ME
RC
ED
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
27
0,6
41
2
71
,10
0
2,0
82
2
,54
1
4,6
23
4
59
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d3
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
15
0,8
75
1
51
,34
0
1,7
97
2
,26
2
4,0
59
4
65
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
03
,99
0
10
9,0
30
1
,20
8
6,2
48
7
,45
6
5,0
40
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
39
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
67
,98
5
65
,05
7
6,7
33
3
,80
5
10
,53
8
-2,9
28
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
51
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
59
3,4
91
5
96
,52
7
11
,82
0
14
,85
6
26
,67
6
3,0
36
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L6
29
G
razi
ng
La
nd
5
67
,39
2
56
2,4
61
5
,33
0
39
9
5,7
29
-4
,93
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,16
0,8
83
1
,15
8,9
88
1
7,1
50
1
5,2
55
3
2,4
05
-1
,89
5
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L6
29
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
7,4
19
3
8,3
76
1
60
1
,11
7
1,2
77
9
57
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d5
0,4
56
5
1,3
94
1
,92
3
2,8
61
4
,78
4
93
8
Oth
er
La
nd
65
W
ate
r A
rea
16
,85
9
16
,85
9
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,2
65
,61
7
1,2
65
,61
7
19
,23
3
19
,23
3
38
,46
6
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
69
4
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
4
17
7
78
7
99
9
7
89
6
22
8
95
8
0
2,0
82
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
4
--
6
1,0
91
1
,10
1
69
1
,17
0
86
5
41
0
1
,79
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:8
7
-
- 5
78
5
93
1
09
7
02
4
2
46
4
0
1,2
08
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(2
)to
:1
,68
5
1,4
28
2
,86
1
--
5,9
74
6
5
6,0
39
3
44
3
50
0
6
,73
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,6
97
1
,43
9
2,8
84
2
,44
7
8,4
67
3
40
8
,80
7
70
0
2,3
13
0
1
1,8
20
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(3
)(4
)to
:3
02
3
19
2
,91
2
1,1
89
4
,72
2
--
4,7
22
6
6
54
2
0
5,3
30
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,9
99
1
,75
8
5,7
96
3
,63
6
13
,18
9
34
0
13
,52
9
76
6
2,8
55
0
1
7,1
50
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
5)
to:
90
8
9
4
6
15
3
1
15
4
--
6
0
16
0
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
45
2
49
6
44
3
12
3
1,5
14
5
8
1,5
72
3
51
-
- 0
1
,92
3
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:2
,54
1
2,2
62
6
,24
8
3,8
05
1
4,8
56
3
99
1
5,2
55
1
,11
7
2,8
61
0
1
9,2
33
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d f
allo
win
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
ad
dit
ion
of
irri
ga
ted
ro
w c
rop
s a
nd
vin
eya
rds.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
ad
dit
ion
of
irri
ga
ted
ro
w c
rop
s a
nd
vin
eya
rds.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e id
en
tifi
ca
tio
n o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in a
rea
s th
rou
gh
ou
t th
e c
ou
nty
.(5
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-U
p L
an
d w
as
du
e t
o t
he
ad
dit
ion
of
irri
ga
ted
ro
w c
rop
s a
nd
vin
eya
rds
, pri
ma
rily
in t
he
vic
init
y o
f C
ast
le A
irp
ort
, an
d d
ue
to
co
nve
rsio
n o
f w
ate
r c
on
tro
l fa
cili
tie
s to
cro
pla
nd
.
ME
RC
ED
CO
UN
TY
Page 46
TA
BL
E A
-19
MO
DO
C C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
79
,25
0
78
,06
5
2,4
61
1
,27
6
3,7
37
-1
,18
5
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
16
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
4,5
42
4
3,1
93
1
,93
9
59
0
2,5
29
-1
,34
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
39
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
13
,97
1
14
,55
6
35
2
93
7
1,2
89
5
85
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
44
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
14
8,1
76
1
50
,18
3
2,7
56
4
,76
3
7,5
19
2
,00
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e1
,39
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
28
5,9
39
2
85
,99
7
7,5
08
7
,56
6
15
,07
4
58
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,49
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
81
4,8
60
8
14
,09
7
1,9
17
1
,15
4
3,0
71
-7
63
G
razi
ng
La
nd
3
,14
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,10
0,7
99
1
,10
0,0
94
9
,42
5
8,7
20
1
8,1
45
-7
05
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4,6
38
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
,43
0
3,6
52
4
2
26
2
30
2
22
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d2
2,7
43
2
3,2
26
1
09
5
92
7
01
4
83
O
the
r L
an
d2
09
W
ate
r A
rea
57
,26
5
57
,26
5
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,1
84
,23
7
1,1
84
,23
7
9,5
38
9
,53
8
19
,07
6
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
4,8
47
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 1
0
2
2,0
18
2
,03
0
36
6
2,3
96
1
6
4
0
2,4
61
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
5
--
2
1,8
10
1
,81
7
4
1,8
21
1
1
17
0
1
,93
9
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:5
1
-
- 2
20
2
26
1
05
3
31
0
2
1
0
35
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:6
78
5
63
4
85
-
- 1
,72
6
66
9
2,3
95
2
01
1
60
0
2
,75
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
68
8
57
4
48
9
4,0
48
5
,79
9
1,1
44
6
,94
3
20
3
36
2
0
7,5
08
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:5
61
2
4
15
7
06
1
,68
4
--
1,6
84
4
2
29
0
1
,91
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,24
9
57
6
90
4
4,7
54
7
,48
3
1,1
44
8
,62
7
20
7
59
1
0
9,4
25
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:3
0
0
0
3
0
3
-
- 1
0
4
O
the
r L
an
dto
:2
4
14
3
3
9
80
1
0
90
1
9
--
0
10
9
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:1
,27
6
59
0
93
7
4,7
63
7
,56
6
1,1
54
8
,72
0
22
6
59
2
0
9,5
38
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d f
allo
win
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.
MO
DO
C C
OU
NT
Y
Page 47
TA
BL
E A
-20
MO
NT
ER
EY
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
16
6,8
12
1
66
,25
1
1,4
04
8
43
2
,24
7
-56
1
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
63
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
43
,09
1
43
,37
2
77
9
1,0
60
1
,83
9
28
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
4,7
68
2
5,5
24
6
54
1
,41
0
2,0
64
7
56
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
26
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
34
,67
1
23
5,1
47
2
,83
7
3,3
13
6
,15
0
47
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
66
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,0
66
,49
4
1,0
65
,69
8
2,9
42
2
,14
6
5,0
88
-7
96
G
razi
ng
La
nd
6
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,30
1,1
65
1
,30
0,8
45
5
,77
9
5,4
59
1
1,2
38
-3
20
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
72
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
56
,53
4
56
,77
9
31
1
55
6
86
7
24
5
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
75
7,1
82
7
57
,25
7
92
6
1,0
01
1
,92
7
75
O
the
r L
an
d3
81
W
ate
r A
rea
6,2
46
6
,24
6
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
2,1
21
,12
7
2,1
21
,12
7
7,0
16
7
,01
6
14
,03
2
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
1,1
09
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
3
35
0
3
8
96
7
1,0
05
1
74
2
25
0
1
,40
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
5
--
6
0
11
6
36
6
47
3
1
29
0
7
79
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
32
4
7
--
0
79
4
21
5
00
7
1
47
0
6
54
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
37
5
0
41
0
1
28
2
,02
4
2,1
52
1
84
5
01
0
2
,83
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
1)
to:
64
9
90
8
1,1
15
0
2
,67
2
--
2,6
72
3
8
23
2
0
2,9
42
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
68
6
95
8
1,1
56
0
2
,80
0
2,0
24
4
,82
4
22
2
73
3
0
5,7
79
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
2)
to:
6
9
0
0
15
2
8
43
-
- 2
68
0
3
11
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
51
9
3
25
4
0
49
8
94
5
92
3
34
-
- 0
9
26
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
84
3
1,0
60
1
,41
0
0
3,3
13
2
,14
6
5,4
59
5
56
1
,00
1
0
7,0
16
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
ca
teg
ori
es
is d
ue
to
ne
wly
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
su
ch
as
vin
eya
rds,
lett
uc
e, a
nd
str
aw
be
rrie
s p
rim
ari
ly in
th
e S
alin
as
Va
lley
an
d a
lon
g it
s m
arg
ins
in f
oo
thill
are
as.
(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-U
p L
an
d w
as
du
e t
o t
he
re
mo
val o
f ta
nks
at
the
Mo
ss L
an
din
g P
ow
er
Pla
nt
site
, th
e la
ck
of
suff
icie
nt
infr
ast
ruc
ture
, an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
MO
NT
ER
EY
CO
UN
TY
Page 48
TA
BL
E A
-21
NA
PA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
31
,74
2
31
,62
1
36
9
24
8
61
7
-12
1
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
46
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e9
,79
8
9,7
11
2
18
1
31
3
49
-8
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
6,3
26
1
6,4
14
4
13
5
01
9
14
8
8
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
18
,49
0
18
,46
4
44
2
41
6
85
8
-26
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
1,4
25
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
6,3
56
7
6,2
10
1
,44
2
1,2
96
2
,73
8
-14
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,4
73
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
78
,95
7
17
9,0
29
2
55
3
27
5
82
7
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
10
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
55
,31
3
25
5,2
39
1
,69
7
1,6
23
3
,32
0
-74
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,5
77
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d2
3,3
28
2
3,5
57
8
0
30
9
38
9
22
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
20
4,8
25
2
04
,67
1
56
2
40
8
97
0
-15
4
Oth
er
La
nd
12
8
Wa
ter
Are
a2
2,3
97
2
2,3
96
1
0
1
-1
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
05
,86
3
50
5,8
63
2
,34
0
2,3
40
4
,68
0
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
1,7
05
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
6
22
0
22
7
5
23
2
21
1
16
0
3
69
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
-
- 2
1
40
1
42
2
1
44
2
0
54
0
2
18
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
8
4
--
44
5
6
23
5
29
1
2
12
0
0
41
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:1
39
4
7
1
--
18
7
82
2
69
1
60
1
3
0
44
2
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
14
7
52
9
4
04
6
12
3
24
9
36
2
03
3
03
0
1
,44
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
4
2
13
9
4
14
9
--
14
9
29
7
7
0
25
5
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
51
5
4
14
8
40
8
76
1
32
4
1,0
85
2
32
3
80
0
1
,69
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
36
1
1
2
2
51
1
5
2
--
28
0
8
0
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
61
6
6
35
0
6
48
3
2
48
5
77
-
- 0
5
62
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
--
1
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
24
8
13
1
50
1
41
6
1,2
96
3
27
1
,62
3
30
9
40
8
0
2,3
40
NA
PA
CO
UN
TY
Page 49
TA
BL
E A
-22
NE
VA
DA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
51
4
39
8
11
6
0
11
6
-11
6
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2,2
85
1
,58
6
69
9
0
69
9
-69
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d5
00
4
80
2
3
3
26
-2
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
22
,66
4
23
,47
0
42
8
48
8
90
8
06
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
31
2
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
25
,96
3
25
,93
4
88
0
85
1
1,7
31
-2
9
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
31
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
11
6,8
66
1
16
,80
8
78
2
0
98
-5
8
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
34
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
42
,82
9
14
2,7
42
9
58
8
71
1
,82
9
-87
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
65
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
17
,50
6
17
,54
1
0
35
3
5
35
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
28
,90
8
12
8,9
60
3
9
91
1
30
5
2
Oth
er
La
nd
44
W
ate
r A
rea
2,1
45
2
,14
5
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
29
1,3
88
2
91
,38
8
99
7
99
7
1,9
94
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D7
03
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
0
11
6
11
6
0
11
6
0
0
0
11
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
0
69
0
69
0
0
69
0
0
9
0
69
9
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:0
0
-
- 0
0
1
1
0
2
2
0
23
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
0
0
--
0
15
1
5
0
27
0
4
2
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
0
0
80
6
80
6
16
8
22
0
5
8
0
88
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
0
0
2
42
4
4
--
44
1
3
3
0
78
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
0
2
84
8
85
0
16
8
66
1
9
1
0
95
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
0
0
1
0
1
4
5
34
-
- 0
3
9
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:0
0
3
8
48
8
51
2
0
87
1
35
9
1
0
99
7
NE
VA
DA
CO
UN
TY
Page 50
TA
BL
E A
-23
OR
AN
GE
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
3,7
72
3
,24
3
66
3
13
4
79
7
-52
9
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
1,4
68
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
41
3
67
7
7
3
80
-7
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
16
1
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d4
,20
9
3,6
54
6
50
9
5
74
5
-55
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
,39
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
8,4
22
7
,26
4
1,3
90
2
32
1
,62
2
-1,1
58
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
,02
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
37
,55
4
37
,63
9
47
4
55
9
1,0
33
8
5
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
88
9
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
5,9
76
4
4,9
03
1
,86
4
79
1
2,6
55
-1
,07
3
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
,91
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
28
7,9
23
2
89
,17
2
75
1
,32
4
1,3
99
1
,24
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
17
4,8
43
1
74
,66
7
99
0
81
4
1,8
04
-1
76
O
the
r L
an
d2
,45
0
Wa
ter
Are
a9
72
9
72
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
09
,71
4
50
9,7
14
2
,92
9
2,9
29
5
,85
8
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
6,3
66
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
2
0
2
26
5
26
7
12
1
27
5
0
66
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
1
--
3
0
4
36
4
0
15
2
2
0
77
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
:1
18
1
-
- 0
1
19
2
35
3
54
8
7
20
9
0
65
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
19
1
5
0
1
25
5
36
6
61
2
23
5
06
0
1
,39
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
8
0
25
0
3
3
--
33
1
81
2
60
0
4
74
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
12
7
1
30
0
1
58
5
36
6
94
4
04
7
66
0
1
,86
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
5
0
13
0
1
8
9
27
-
- 4
8
0
75
O
the
r L
an
dto
:2
2
5
2
0
56
1
4
70
9
20
-
- 0
9
90
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
13
4
3
95
0
2
32
5
59
7
91
1
,32
4
81
4
0
2,9
29
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
ve
rify
ing
ag
ric
ult
ure
in t
he
gro
un
d o
n la
nd
pre
vio
usl
y m
ap
pe
d a
s a
nu
rse
ry.
Th
e a
rea
is lo
ca
ted
ne
ar
Irvi
ne
Bo
ule
vard
an
d J
eff
rey
Ro
ad
.
OR
AN
GE
CO
UN
TY
Page 51
TA
BL
E A
-24
PL
AC
ER
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
7,8
94
7
,34
0
60
4
50
6
54
-5
54
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
,82
3
4,0
68
8
32
7
7
90
9
-75
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
0,1
95
1
8,0
60
2
,37
4
23
9
2,6
13
-2
,13
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
10
1,0
11
1
03
,27
3
1,4
61
3
,72
3
5,1
84
2
,26
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e6
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
33
,92
3
13
2,7
41
5
,27
1
4,0
89
9
,36
0
-1,1
82
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L8
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
4,4
48
2
4,1
93
1
,47
8
1,2
23
2
,70
1
-25
5
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,7
22
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
15
8,3
71
1
56
,93
4
6,7
49
5
,31
2
12
,06
1
-1,4
37
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,7
30
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d5
8,6
22
5
8,7
14
7
86
8
78
1
,66
4
92
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
89
,45
8
19
0,8
03
1
,00
5
2,3
50
3
,35
5
1,3
45
O
the
r L
an
d1
20
W
ate
r A
rea
5,0
11
5
,01
1
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
41
1,4
62
4
11
,46
2
8,5
40
8
,54
0
17
,08
0
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
1,8
50
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
1
35
2
35
4
13
3
48
7
0
11
7
0
60
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
1
62
7
63
0
79
7
09
0
1
23
0
8
32
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
:1
1
-
- 2
,15
4
2,1
56
1
63
2
,31
9
0
55
0
2
,37
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:4
5
7
13
6
--
19
7
61
1
80
8
9
64
4
0
1,4
61
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
5
9
13
8
3,1
33
3
,33
7
98
6
4,3
23
9
9
39
0
5
,27
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
5
2
1
10
1
8
--
18
5
63
8
97
0
1
,47
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
2
61
1
39
3
,14
3
3,3
55
9
86
4
,34
1
57
2
1,8
36
0
6
,74
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:0
0
9
8
9
10
7
16
5
27
2
--
51
4
0
78
6
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
38
1
6
2
57
1
62
7
72
6
99
3
06
-
- 0
1
,00
5
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:5
0
77
2
39
3
,72
3
4,0
89
1
,22
3
5,3
12
8
78
2
,35
0
0
8,5
40
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d f
allo
win
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f ri
ce
fie
lds
on
fo
rme
r in
du
stri
al p
on
ds
in t
he
we
ste
rn p
art
of
the
co
un
ty.
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
an
d O
the
r L
an
d
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
PL
AC
ER
CO
UN
TY
Page 52
TA
BL
E A
-25
RIV
ER
SID
E C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
12
2,9
35
1
19
,63
5
5,6
55
2
,35
5
8,0
10
-3
,30
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
37
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
44
,65
3
44
,08
6
1,4
63
8
96
2
,35
9
-56
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
71
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
37
,13
3
35
,39
1
2,7
80
1
,03
8
3,8
18
-1
,74
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
76
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
22
9,1
56
2
29
,87
7
7,0
12
7
,73
3
14
,74
5
72
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e1
2,2
17
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
33
,87
7
42
8,9
89
1
6,9
10
1
2,0
22
2
8,9
32
-4
,88
8
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
12
,93
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
11
1,2
19
1
10
,84
1
41
0
32
4
42
-3
78
G
razi
ng
La
nd
3
,62
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
45
,09
6
53
9,8
30
1
7,3
20
1
2,0
54
2
9,3
74
-5
,26
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
6,5
67
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
15
,67
9
32
1,5
53
2
68
6
,14
2
6,4
10
5
,87
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
1,0
21
,33
6
1,0
20
,71
7
3,1
18
2
,49
9
5,6
17
-6
19
O
the
r L
an
d1
7,6
91
W
ate
r A
rea
62
,35
0
62
,36
1
0
11
1
1
11
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,94
4,4
61
1
,94
4,4
61
2
0,7
06
2
0,7
06
4
1,4
12
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D3
4,2
58
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 6
8
8
3,7
40
3
,83
4
0
3,8
34
9
62
8
59
0
5
,65
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(2
)to
:4
-
- 3
2
1,2
25
1
,26
1
0
1,2
61
9
2
11
0
0
1,4
63
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(2
)to
:5
3
-
- 2
,37
6
2,3
84
0
2
,38
4
15
5
24
1
0
2,7
80
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(3
)to
:2
,16
0
80
7
45
4
--
3,4
21
3
2
3,4
53
2
,56
3
98
5
11
7
,01
2
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,1
69
8
16
5
74
7
,34
1
10
,90
0
32
1
0,9
32
3
,77
2
2,1
95
1
1
16
,91
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
0
0
8
16
0
16
8
--
16
8
16
5
77
0
4
10
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,1
69
8
16
5
82
7
,50
1
11
,06
8
32
1
1,1
00
3
,93
7
2,2
72
1
1
17
,32
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(4
)to
:1
9
4
8
10
4
1
0
41
-
- 2
27
0
2
68
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
67
7
6
44
8
22
2
91
3
0
91
3
2,2
05
-
- 0
3
,11
8
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:2
,35
5
89
6
1,0
38
7
,73
3
12
,02
2
32
1
2,0
54
6
,14
2
2,4
99
1
1
20
,70
6
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
du
e t
o t
he
ad
dit
ion
of
po
tte
d p
lan
t n
urs
eri
es
thro
ug
ho
ut
the
co
un
ty.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
larg
ely
du
e t
o la
nd
idlin
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(3
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
ad
dit
ion
of
irri
ga
ted
ro
w c
rop
s a
nd
vin
eya
rds.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-Up
La
nd
wa
s d
ue
to
de
teri
ora
tin
g a
ba
nd
on
ed
ru
nw
ays
of
wh
at
use
d t
o b
e B
lyth
e A
rmy
Air
fie
ld lo
ca
ted
no
rth
of
the
cu
rre
nt
Bly
the
Air
po
rt.
RIV
ER
SID
E C
OU
NT
Y
Page 53
TA
BL
E A
-26
SA
CR
AM
EN
TO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
10
4,3
66
9
7,4
76
7
,28
0
39
0
7,6
70
-6
,89
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
49
,47
0
45
,26
4
4,7
02
4
96
5
,19
8
-4,2
06
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
15
,46
3
15
,07
6
53
2
14
5
67
7
-38
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
43
,81
9
53
,92
8
1,3
40
1
1,4
49
1
2,7
89
1
0,1
09
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
21
7
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
21
3,1
18
2
11
,74
4
13
,85
4
12
,48
0
26
,33
4
-1,3
74
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
17
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
56
,14
4
15
5,8
22
8
44
5
22
1
,36
6
-32
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,0
31
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
36
9,2
62
3
67
,56
6
14
,69
8
13
,00
2
27
,70
0
-1,6
96
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,2
48
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
77
,91
5
17
8,7
84
0
8
69
8
69
8
69
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d7
0,7
57
7
1,5
84
4
23
1
,25
0
1,6
73
8
27
O
the
r L
an
d1
24
W
ate
r A
rea
18
,14
7
18
,14
7
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
63
6,0
81
6
36
,08
1
15
,12
1
15
,12
1
30
,24
2
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
1,3
72
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 5
1
1
6,8
07
6
,82
3
8
6,8
31
7
1
37
8
0
7,2
80
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
2
--
2
4,3
83
4
,38
7
35
4
,42
2
14
0
14
0
0
4,7
02
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
3
2
--
17
1
17
6
26
7
44
3
13
7
6
0
53
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:3
27
4
21
3
4
--
78
2
18
2
96
4
17
4
20
2
0
1,3
40
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
32
4
28
4
7
11
,36
1
12
,16
8
49
2
12
,66
0
39
8
79
6
0
13
,85
4
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
12
1
6
67
4
6
14
1
--
14
1
24
9
45
4
0
84
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
44
4
44
1
14
1
1,4
07
1
2,3
09
4
92
1
2,8
01
6
47
1
,25
0
0
14
,69
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
46
5
2
31
4
2
17
1
30
2
01
2
22
-
- 0
4
23
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
39
0
49
6
14
5
11
,44
9
12
,48
0
52
2
13
,00
2
86
9
1,2
50
0
1
5,1
21
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d f
allo
win
g f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.
SA
CR
AM
EN
TO
CO
UN
TY
Page 54
TA
BL
E A
-27
SA
N B
EN
ITO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
28
,70
1
27
,42
5
2,1
06
8
30
2
,93
6
-1,2
76
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e6
,58
7
6,4
75
7
00
5
88
1
,28
8
-11
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,39
9
2,2
50
3
55
2
06
5
61
-1
49
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e2
3,2
34
2
1,3
10
5
,05
6
3,1
32
8
,18
8
-1,9
24
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
60
,92
1
57
,46
0
8,2
17
4
,75
6
12
,97
3
-3,4
61
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
6
12
,45
5
61
4,8
21
3
,11
6
5,4
82
8
,59
8
2,3
66
G
razi
ng
La
nd
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
67
3,3
76
6
72
,28
1
11
,33
3
10
,23
8
21
,57
1
-1,0
95
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
7,9
02
8
,02
3
55
1
76
2
31
1
21
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d2
06
,96
8
20
7,9
37
3
26
1
,29
5
1,6
21
9
69
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
1,1
40
1
,14
5
10
1
5
25
5
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
8
89
,38
6
88
9,3
86
1
1,7
24
1
1,7
24
2
3,4
48
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
32
8
38
8
71
8
98
1
,76
9
28
3
09
0
2
,10
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
1
--
0
25
1
25
2
43
0
68
2
1
17
0
7
00
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
9
0
--
35
4
4
27
5
31
9
1
35
0
3
55
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:5
47
5
23
6
6
--
1,1
36
3
,79
5
4,9
31
4
1
21
0
5
,05
6
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
55
7
52
4
98
1
,12
4
2,3
03
5
,39
8
7,7
01
3
4
48
2
0
8,2
17
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(2
)to
:2
14
5
0
94
1
,89
2
2,2
50
-
- 2
,25
0
46
8
05
1
5
3,1
16
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
77
1
57
4
19
2
3,0
16
4
,55
3
5,3
98
9
,95
1
80
1
,28
7
15
1
1,3
33
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:5
0
1
1
10
2
6
21
4
7
--
8
0
55
O
the
r L
an
dto
:5
4
14
3
9
6
16
7
63
2
30
9
6
--
0
32
6
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
1
0
10
0
1
0
0
0
--
10
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:8
30
5
88
2
06
3
,13
2
4,7
56
5
,48
2
10
,23
8
17
6
1,2
95
1
5
11
,72
4
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
is d
ue
to
no
nir
rig
ate
d g
rain
are
as
be
ing
left
idle
fo
r fo
ur
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e id
en
tifi
ca
tio
n o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in a
rea
s th
rou
gh
ou
t th
e c
ou
nty
.
SA
N B
EN
ITO
CO
UN
TY
Page 55
TA
BL
E A
-28
SA
N B
ER
NA
RD
INO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
14
,09
0
12
,84
8
1,6
52
4
10
2
,06
2
-1,2
42
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d2
90
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e6
,74
7
6,2
42
5
46
4
1
58
7
-50
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,66
1
2,5
11
2
63
1
13
3
76
-1
50
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
26
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
1,8
28
1
,16
0
66
8
0
66
8
-66
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e9
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
25
,32
6
22
,76
1
3,1
29
5
64
3
,69
3
-2,5
65
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
09
G
razi
ng
La
nd
9
01
,66
6
90
2,5
90
2
,12
1
3,0
45
5
,16
6
92
4
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
12
,73
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L9
26
,99
2
92
5,3
51
5
,25
0
3,6
09
8
,85
9
-1,6
41
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
13
,14
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
27
5,6
95
2
77
,87
5
47
3
2,6
53
3
,12
6
2,1
80
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d2
46
,41
3
24
5,8
13
1
,79
6
1,1
96
2
,99
2
-60
0
Oth
er
La
nd
1,2
43
W
ate
r A
rea
44
9
51
0
0
61
6
1
61
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,44
9,5
49
1
,44
9,5
49
7
,51
9
7,5
19
1
5,0
38
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
4,3
83
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 0
1
1
0
11
1
,17
9
1,1
90
2
77
1
85
0
1
,65
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
1
--
10
0
1
1
45
8
46
9
57
2
0
0
54
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:1
1
-
- 0
2
2
40
2
42
2
0
1
0
26
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:8
1
27
0
-
- 1
08
5
43
6
51
1
7
0
0
66
8
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
83
2
8
21
0
1
32
2
,42
0
2,5
52
3
71
2
06
0
3
,12
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
16
0
10
5
0
0
22
0
--
22
0
1,1
28
7
73
0
2
,12
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
43
3
8
71
0
3
52
2
,42
0
2,7
72
1
,49
9
97
9
0
5,2
50
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
2)
to:
5
0
18
0
2
3
17
2
19
5
--
21
7
61
4
73
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
62
3
2
4
0
18
9
45
3
64
2
1,1
54
-
- 0
1
,79
6
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:4
10
4
1
11
3
0
56
4
3,0
45
3
,60
9
2,6
53
1
,19
6
61
7
,51
9
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
wa
s d
ue
to
th
e d
elin
ea
tio
n o
f a
wa
ter
bo
dy
in P
rad
o R
eg
ion
al P
ark
, an
d t
wo
po
tte
d p
lan
t n
urs
eri
es
in t
he
Ch
ino
/Mo
ntc
lair
are
a, a
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re in
so
me
loc
ati
on
s, a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
di g
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
SA
N B
ER
NA
RD
INO
CO
UN
TY
Page 56
TA
BL
E A
-29
SA
N D
IEG
O C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
7,7
54
7
,08
5
81
9
15
0
96
9
-66
9
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
89
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
0,4
12
9
,43
9
1,1
53
1
80
1
,33
3
-97
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
14
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
51
,97
5
48
,35
9
4,1
10
4
94
4
,60
4
-3,6
16
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
12
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e1
53
,18
6
15
4,0
38
3
,03
9
3,8
91
6
,93
0
85
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e1
,95
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
22
3,3
27
2
18
,92
1
9,1
21
4
,71
5
13
,83
6
-4,4
06
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,17
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
12
6,8
71
1
26
,49
6
47
5
10
0
57
5
-37
5
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,9
32
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
35
0,1
98
3
45
,41
7
9,5
96
4
,81
5
14
,41
1
-4,7
81
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4,1
09
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
50
,50
0
35
5,1
46
6
5
4,7
11
4
,77
6
4,6
46
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
,45
2,6
98
1
,45
2,8
33
3
,45
4
3,5
89
7
,04
3
13
5
Oth
er
La
nd
3,3
81
W
ate
r A
rea
13
,29
8
13
,29
8
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
2,1
66
,69
4
2,1
66
,69
4
13
,11
5
13
,11
5
26
,23
0
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
7,4
90
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
3
10
6
09
6
22
0
6
22
7
0
12
7
0
81
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
22
7
59
7
83
0
7
83
6
5
30
5
0
1,1
53
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
:1
6
24
-
- 2
,36
2
2,4
02
1
5
2,4
17
1
05
1
,58
8
0
4,1
10
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(3
)to
:8
6
93
2
74
-
- 4
53
2
6
47
9
1,1
91
1
,36
9
0
3,0
39
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
04
1
20
3
06
3
,73
0
4,2
60
4
1
4,3
01
1
,43
1
3,3
89
0
9
,12
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
0
0
6
36
4
2
--
42
2
72
1
61
0
4
75
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
10
4
12
0
31
2
3,7
66
4
,30
2
41
4
,34
3
1,7
03
3
,55
0
0
9,5
96
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:2
0
4
1
7
1
9
26
-
- 3
9
0
65
O
the
r L
an
dto
:4
4
60
1
78
1
24
4
06
4
0
44
6
3,0
08
-
- 0
3
,45
4
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:1
50
1
80
4
94
3
,89
1
4,7
15
1
00
4
,81
5
4,7
11
3
,58
9
0
13
,11
5
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
du
e t
o la
nd
fa
llow
ing
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s, a
s w
ell
as
are
as
of
low
de
nsi
ty h
ou
sin
g.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
de
line
ati
on
of
low
de
nsi
ty h
ou
sin
g in
va
rio
us
are
as
of
the
co
un
ty.
SA
N D
IEG
O C
OU
NT
Y
Page 57
TA
BL
E A
-30
SA
N J
OA
QU
IN C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
39
6,9
84
3
85
,33
7
12
,57
0
92
3
13
,49
3
-11
,64
7
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
40
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
86
,29
7
83
,30
7
3,2
02
2
12
3
,41
4
-2,9
90
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e3
86
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
66
,62
1
69
,48
1
1,5
90
4
,45
0
6,0
40
2
,86
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
65
,78
8
76
,86
9
3,6
44
1
4,7
25
1
8,3
69
1
1,0
81
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
3,0
18
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L6
15
,69
0
61
4,9
94
2
1,0
06
2
0,3
10
4
1,3
16
-6
96
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
,80
8
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
14
2,4
60
1
39
,23
5
3,3
41
1
16
3
,45
7
-3,2
25
G
razi
ng
La
nd
0
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
75
8,1
50
7
54
,22
9
24
,34
7
20
,42
6
44
,77
3
-3,9
21
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
3,8
08
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d9
0,5
29
9
1,9
29
1
27
1
,52
7
1,6
54
1
,40
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
52
,14
1
54
,66
2
83
8
3,3
59
4
,19
7
2,5
21
O
the
r L
an
d4
85
W
ate
r A
rea
11
,77
3
11
,77
3
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
91
2,5
93
9
12
,59
3
25
,31
2
25
,31
2
50
,62
4
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
4,2
93
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(3
)to
: -
- 4
2
1
0,5
33
1
0,5
39
4
8
10
,58
7
52
6
1,4
57
0
1
2,5
70
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
4
--
3
2,1
58
2
,16
5
0
2,1
65
3
39
6
98
0
3
,20
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
33
0
-
- 1
,32
2
1,3
55
1
4
1,3
69
1
6
20
5
0
1,5
90
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(2
)to
:6
47
1
76
1
,79
6
--
2,6
19
4
2
2,6
61
1
62
8
21
0
3
,64
4
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
68
4
18
0
1,8
01
1
4,0
13
1
6,6
78
1
04
1
6,7
82
1
,04
3
3,1
81
0
2
1,0
06
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(2
)to
:8
8
12
2
,59
8
48
0
3,1
78
-
- 3
,17
8
21
1
42
0
3
,34
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
72
1
92
4
,39
9
14
,49
3
19
,85
6
10
4
19
,96
0
1,0
64
3
,32
3
0
24
,34
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
10
1
2
35
3
4
91
0
9
1
--
36
0
1
27
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
41
8
1
6
19
8
36
3
12
3
75
4
63
-
- 0
8
38
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
92
3
21
2
4,4
50
1
4,7
25
2
0,3
10
1
16
2
0,4
26
1
,52
7
3,3
59
0
2
5,3
12
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les
an
d t
he
ide
nti
fic
ati
on
of
no
nir
rig
ate
d g
rain
are
as
thro
ug
ho
ut
the
co
un
ty.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
is d
ue
to
ne
wly
irri
ga
ted
vin
eya
rds,
orc
ha
rds,
an
d o
the
r c
rop
s; p
rim
ari
ly in
th
e e
ast
ern
ha
lf o
f th
e C
ou
nty
.(3
) C
on
vers
ion
s to
Oth
er
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o d
elin
ea
tio
n o
f lo
w d
en
sity
ho
usi
ng
, th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f w
etl
an
ds,
ag
gre
ga
te m
inin
g, a
nd
lan
d g
rad
ed
fo
r d
eve
lop
me
nt.
SA
N J
OA
QU
IN C
OU
NT
Y
Page 58
TA
BL
E A
-31
SA
N L
UIS
OB
ISP
O C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
41
,56
9
41
,31
9
1,1
29
8
79
2
,00
8
-25
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
21
,10
9
21
,13
2
68
5
70
8
1,3
93
2
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
8,7
77
3
9,9
50
8
94
2
,06
7
2,9
61
1
,17
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
30
9,0
81
3
07
,32
5
7,2
81
5
,52
5
12
,80
6
-1,7
56
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
13
8
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
41
0,5
36
4
09
,72
6
9,9
89
9
,17
9
19
,16
8
-81
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
13
8
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,1
83
,04
2
1,1
81
,01
5
7,5
49
5
,52
2
13
,07
1
-2,0
27
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
19
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,5
93
,57
8
1,5
90
,74
1
17
,53
8
14
,70
1
32
,23
9
-2,8
37
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
35
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
44
,39
2
45
,01
7
58
2
1,2
07
1
,78
9
62
5
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
23
9,0
45
2
42
,99
8
1,8
01
5
,75
4
7,5
55
3
,95
3
Oth
er
La
nd
48
W
ate
r A
rea
10
,52
1
8,7
80
1
,74
1
0
1,7
41
-1
,74
1
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,8
87
,53
6
1,8
87
,53
6
21
,66
2
21
,66
2
43
,32
4
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
40
5
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
2
22
9
57
9
81
2
3
1,0
04
3
5
90
0
1
,12
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
33
5
71
6
06
1
2
61
8
25
4
2
0
68
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:1
0
11
-
- 1
34
1
55
6
26
7
81
9
1
04
0
8
94
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(1
)(4
)to
:7
62
6
49
4
86
-
- 1
,89
7
2,9
90
4
,88
7
39
2
2,0
02
0
7
,28
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
77
4
66
2
54
1
1,6
62
3
,63
9
3,6
51
7
,29
0
46
1
2,2
38
0
9
,98
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
2)(
3)
to:
16
1
0
1,2
93
3
,58
3
4,9
02
-
- 4
,90
2
18
1
2,4
66
0
7
,54
9
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
90
6
72
1
,83
4
5,2
45
8
,54
1
3,6
51
1
2,1
92
6
42
4
,70
4
0
17
,53
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(5
)to
:1
9
5
4
86
1
14
1
15
2
29
-
- 3
53
0
5
82
O
the
r L
an
d (
1)
to:
69
3
1
18
5
11
8
40
3
83
3
1,2
36
5
65
-
- 0
1
,80
1
Wa
ter
Are
a (
6)
to:
1
0
44
7
6
12
1
92
3
1,0
44
0
6
97
-
- 1
,74
1
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
87
9
70
8
2,0
67
5
,52
5
9,1
79
5
,52
2
14
,70
1
1,2
07
5
,75
4
0
21
,66
2
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o d
elin
ea
tio
n o
f lo
w-d
en
sity
ho
usi
ng
, fa
rmst
ea
ds,
an
d r
ura
l co
mm
erc
ial i
n v
ari
ou
s a
rea
s o
f th
e c
ou
nty
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d is
du
e t
o n
ew
ly ir
rig
ate
d v
ine
yard
s, o
rch
ard
s, a
nd
oth
er
cro
ps;
pri
ma
rily
in t
he
inte
rio
r a
nd
co
ast
al v
alle
ys.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is d
ue
to
th
e id
en
tifi
ca
tio
n o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in a
rea
s th
rou
gh
ou
t th
e c
ou
nty
.(4
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d is
du
e t
o d
ry g
rain
are
as
be
ing
left
idle
fo
r fo
ur
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(5)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is d
ue
to
th
e a
ba
nd
on
me
nt
of
urb
an
use
s fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
(6)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o o
the
r c
ate
go
rie
s d
ue
to
th
e o
bse
rva
tio
n t
ha
t th
e u
pp
er
rea
ch
es
of
Tw
itc
he
ll R
ese
rvo
ir a
re d
ry in
mo
st y
ea
rs a
nd
th
e la
nd
is u
sed
fo
r o
the
r p
urp
ose
s.
SA
N L
UIS
OB
ISP
O C
OU
NT
Y
Page 59
TA
BL
E A
-32
SA
N M
AT
EO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
2,2
21
2
,18
0
12
0
79
1
99
-4
1
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
14
2
14
6
0
4
4
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,18
2
2,2
71
1
54
2
43
3
97
8
9
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
93
7
69
5
41
9
17
7
59
6
-24
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
,48
2
5,2
92
6
93
5
03
1
,19
6
-19
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
48
,95
9
48
,79
7
64
6
48
4
1,1
30
-1
62
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
49
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
54
,44
1
54
,08
9
1,3
39
9
87
2
,32
6
-35
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
49
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d7
1,8
72
7
2,5
10
1
2
65
0
66
2
63
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
16
1,4
05
1
61
,11
9
77
0
48
4
1,2
54
-2
86
O
the
r L
an
d3
07
W
ate
r A
rea
65
,73
4
65
,73
4
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
35
3,4
52
3
53
,45
2
2,1
21
2
,12
1
4,2
42
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D5
56
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
0
21
0
2
1
79
1
00
2
1
8
0
12
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:1
4
0
--
0
14
1
15
1
29
0
2
5
0
15
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:8
1
1
26
-
- 1
35
2
69
4
04
0
1
5
0
41
9
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
22
1
1
47
0
1
70
4
63
6
33
2
5
8
0
69
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
15
1
7
4
12
9
21
9
--
21
9
8
41
9
0
64
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
7
2
22
1
12
9
38
9
46
3
85
2
10
4
77
0
1
,33
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
2
0
3
0
5
0
5
--
7
0
12
O
the
r L
an
dto
:4
0
2
19
4
8
10
9
21
1
30
6
40
-
- 0
7
70
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
79
4
2
43
1
77
5
03
4
84
9
87
6
50
4
84
0
2
,12
1
SA
N M
AT
EO
CO
UN
TY
Page 60
TA
BL
E A
-33
SA
NT
A B
AR
BA
RA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
67
,17
0
66
,56
8
1,3
11
7
09
2
,02
0
-60
2
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
24
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
12
,29
8
12
,47
5
33
9
51
6
85
5
17
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
4,7
79
3
5,6
06
1
,10
1
1,9
28
3
,02
9
82
7
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
19
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
11
,10
6
10
,64
3
1,4
24
9
61
2
,38
5
-46
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e3
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
12
5,3
53
1
25
,29
2
4,1
75
4
,11
4
8,2
89
-6
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
49
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
58
1,9
85
5
81
,64
2
3,0
97
2
,75
4
5,8
51
-3
43
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
13
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
70
7,3
38
7
06
,93
4
7,2
72
6
,86
8
14
,14
0
-40
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
09
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d6
2,3
34
6
2,7
62
5
7
48
5
54
2
42
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
26
5,4
67
2
65
,91
1
69
6
1,1
40
1
,83
6
44
4
Oth
er
La
nd
18
1
Wa
ter
Are
a4
,19
1
3,7
23
4
68
0
4
68
-4
68
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,03
9,3
30
1
,03
9,3
30
8
,49
3
8,4
93
1
6,9
86
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D8
90
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
4
38
1
80
2
22
7
21
9
43
1
40
2
28
0
1
,31
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
6
15
2
3
28
9
31
2
2
25
0
3
39
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
13
4
-
- 9
0
10
7
76
1
86
8
29
2
04
0
1
,10
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:1
98
7
1
94
-
- 3
63
9
38
1
,30
1
25
9
8
0
1,4
24
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
13
7
9
13
8
28
5
71
5
2,7
09
3
,42
4
19
6
55
5
0
4,1
75
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(1
)to
:3
72
3
36
1
,57
5
65
4
2,9
37
-
- 2
,93
7
54
1
06
0
3
,09
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
85
4
15
1
,71
3
93
9
3,6
52
2
,70
9
6,3
61
2
50
6
61
0
7
,27
2
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
11
4
1
9
2
36
1
0
46
-
- 1
1
0
57
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
13
9
7
19
6
20
4
26
3
5
46
1
23
5
--
0
69
6
Wa
ter
Are
a (
2)
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
46
8
--
46
8
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
70
9
51
6
1,9
28
9
61
4
,11
4
2,7
54
6
,86
8
48
5
1,1
40
0
8
,49
3
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
is d
ue
to
ne
wly
irri
ga
ted
vin
eya
rds
an
d o
the
r c
rop
s.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Wa
ter
du
e t
o t
he
ob
serv
ati
on
th
at
the
up
pe
r re
ac
he
s o
f T
wit
ch
ell
Re
serv
oir
are
dry
in m
ost
ye
ars
an
d t
he
lan
d is
use
d f
or
oth
er
pu
rpo
ses.
SA
NT
A B
AR
BA
RA
CO
UN
TY
Page 61
TA
BL
E A
-34
SA
NT
A C
LA
RA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
18
,80
4
17
,27
0
1,7
01
1
67
1
,86
8
-1,5
34
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d5
89
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e4
,02
8
3,6
30
4
15
1
7
43
2
-39
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
,48
9
2,5
23
2
79
3
13
5
92
3
4
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d7
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e5
,96
7
4,3
28
2
,21
1
57
2
2,7
83
-1
,63
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e4
91
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
1,2
88
2
7,7
51
4
,60
6
1,0
69
5
,67
5
-3,5
37
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,15
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
39
0,0
91
3
92
,77
7
79
2
3,4
78
4
,27
0
2,6
86
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
,61
9
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
21
,37
9
42
0,5
28
5
,39
8
4,5
47
9
,94
5
-85
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,76
9
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
18
8,8
82
1
89
,12
9
18
9
43
6
62
5
24
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
21
6,5
04
2
17
,10
8
46
0
1,0
64
1
,52
4
60
4
Oth
er
La
nd
15
2
Wa
ter
Are
a8
,45
8
8,4
58
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
8
35
,22
3
83
5,2
23
6
,04
7
6,0
47
1
2,0
94
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D2
,92
1
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 4
2
20
2
58
4
82
9
22
1
,40
4
58
2
39
0
1
,70
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
5
--
0
70
7
5
27
2
34
7
3
65
0
4
15
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(2
)to
:7
6
3
--
2
81
1
33
2
14
1
4
51
0
2
79
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(3
)to
:7
3
1
6
--
26
1
,90
7
1,9
33
7
9
19
9
0
2,2
11
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L8
8
10
2
36
3
30
6
64
3
,23
4
3,8
98
1
54
5
54
0
4
,60
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
42
0
9
2
12
2
63
-
- 2
63
1
10
4
19
0
7
92
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
13
0
10
2
45
5
42
9
27
3
,23
4
4,1
61
2
64
9
73
0
5
,39
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(4
)to
:1
3
6
5
3
27
7
1
98
-
- 9
1
0
18
9
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
24
1
6
3
27
1
15
1
73
2
88
1
72
-
- 0
4
60
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
16
7
17
3
13
5
72
1
,06
9
3,4
78
4
,54
7
43
6
1,0
64
0
6
,04
7
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e in
co
rpo
rati
on
of
up
da
ted
dig
ita
l so
il su
rve
y d
ata
(S
SU
RG
O)
into
th
e 2
01
0 Im
po
rta
nt
Fa
rmla
nd
da
ta.
Th
is r
efl
ec
ts m
od
ific
ati
on
s m
ad
e t
o s
oil
ma
pp
ing
by
the
U
.S. D
ep
art
me
nt
of
Ag
ric
ult
ure
as
op
po
sed
to
lan
d u
se c
on
vers
ion
s.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
de
line
ati
on
of
irri
ga
ted
ag
ric
ult
ure
th
at
ha
d p
revi
ou
sly
be
en
ma
pp
ed
as
po
tte
d p
lan
t n
urs
eri
es.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
is d
ue
to
dry
gra
in a
rea
s b
ein
g le
ft id
le f
or
fou
r o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
SA
NT
A C
LA
RA
CO
UN
TY
Page 62
TA
BL
E A
-35
SA
NT
A C
RU
Z C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
14
,35
7
13
,81
7
60
4
64
6
68
-5
40
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e2
,70
6
2,4
49
2
72
1
5
28
7
-25
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d4
,24
9
3,7
63
5
60
7
4
63
4
-48
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
51
6
54
8
5
37
4
2
32
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
21
,82
8
20
,57
7
1,4
41
1
90
1
,63
1
-1,2
51
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
7,9
52
1
8,2
68
2
38
5
54
7
92
3
16
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
39
,78
0
38
,84
5
1,6
79
7
44
2
,42
3
-93
5
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d3
2,0
13
3
2,7
50
4
7
78
4
83
1
73
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
21
3,5
63
2
13
,76
1
80
9
1,0
07
1
,81
6
19
8
Oth
er
La
nd
24
W
ate
r A
rea
35
7
35
7
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
28
5,7
13
2
85
,71
3
2,5
35
2
,53
5
5,0
70
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D2
5
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
4
16
0
2
0
15
2
17
2
53
3
79
0
6
04
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:3
-
- 2
0
5
1
70
1
75
1
5
82
0
2
72
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
20
2
-
- 0
2
2
20
4
22
6
6
32
8
0
56
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
5
0
5
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
3
6
18
0
4
7
52
6
57
3
74
7
94
0
1
,44
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
2
0
19
0
2
1
--
21
3
7
18
0
0
23
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
5
6
37
0
6
8
52
6
59
4
11
1
97
4
0
1,6
79
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:7
0
1
0
8
6
1
4
--
33
0
4
7
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
32
9
3
6
37
1
14
2
2
13
6
67
3
--
0
80
9
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:6
4
15
7
4
37
1
90
5
54
7
44
7
84
1
,00
7
0
2,5
35
SA
NT
A C
RU
Z C
OU
NT
Y
Page 63
TA
BL
E A
-36
SH
AS
TA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
12
,28
9
11
,08
2
1,4
54
2
47
1
,70
1
-1,2
07
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e3
,28
7
2,9
28
3
92
3
3
42
5
-35
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d5
09
4
99
6
9
59
1
28
-1
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
6,1
04
5
,20
7
1,2
29
3
32
1
,56
1
-89
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
2,1
89
1
9,7
16
3
,14
4
67
1
3,8
15
-2
,47
3
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
41
2,7
31
4
14
,05
2
1,0
34
2
,35
5
3,3
89
1
,32
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
85
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
34
,92
0
43
3,7
68
4
,17
8
3,0
26
7
,20
4
-1,1
52
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
85
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
36
,64
0
36
,93
0
19
9
48
9
68
8
29
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
54
3,7
73
5
44
,63
2
49
4
1,3
53
1
,84
7
85
9
Oth
er
La
nd
2,2
14
W
ate
r A
rea
5,8
75
5
,87
8
0
3
3
3
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,0
21
,20
8
1,0
21
,20
8
4,8
71
4
,87
1
9,7
42
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D3
,07
2
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
--
1
14
1
10
1
25
8
94
1
,01
9
21
4
14
0
1
,45
4
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
1
--
1
1
3
30
9
31
2
1
79
0
3
92
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
1
0
--
1
2
57
5
9
0
10
0
6
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
3
0
1
--
4
1,0
56
1
,06
0
7
16
2
0
1,2
29
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
1
1
6
11
2
13
4
2,3
16
2
,45
0
29
6
65
0
3
,14
4
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
19
6
15
3
6
16
6
41
3
--
41
3
68
5
53
0
1
,03
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
01
1
6
52
2
78
5
47
2
,31
6
2,8
63
9
7
1,2
18
0
4
,17
8
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:2
8
0
3
4
44
2
0
64
-
- 1
35
0
1
99
O
the
r L
an
dto
:4
4
9
7
20
8
0
19
9
9
39
2
--
3
49
4
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:2
47
3
3
59
3
32
6
71
2
,35
5
3,0
26
4
89
1
,35
3
3
4,8
71
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d la
rge
ly d
ue
to
irri
ga
ted
pa
stu
re o
n u
niq
ue
so
ils o
r n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in f
ield
s le
ft f
allo
w f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
ck
of
suff
icie
nt
infr
ast
ruc
ture
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
SH
AS
TA
CO
UN
TY
Page 64
TA
BL
E A
-37
SIE
RR
A V
AL
LE
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
8,7
24
6
,59
9
2,1
99
7
4
2,2
73
-2
,12
5
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
7,4
74
6
,24
4
1,4
85
2
55
1
,74
0
-1,2
30
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
3,7
93
3
,16
9
71
4
90
8
04
-6
24
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e8
9,3
02
9
2,9
64
5
81
4
,24
3
4,8
24
3
,66
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e5
7
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
10
9,2
93
1
08
,97
6
4,9
79
4
,66
2
9,6
41
-3
17
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
79
,50
0
79
,57
6
18
8
26
4
45
2
76
G
razi
ng
La
nd
2
,70
9
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
88
,79
3
18
8,5
52
5
,16
7
4,9
26
1
0,0
93
-2
41
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
2,7
66
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d9
99
1
,00
9
0
10
1
0
10
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d7
,90
3
8,1
64
9
2
70
2
79
2
61
O
the
r L
an
d1
53
W
ate
r A
rea
75
4
5
30
0
3
0
-30
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
97
,77
0
19
7,7
70
5
,20
6
5,2
06
1
0,4
12
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D2
,91
9
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 0
1
2
,14
7
2,1
48
3
2
2,1
80
4
1
5
0
2,1
99
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
1
--
1
1,4
48
1
,45
0
32
1
,48
2
0
3
0
1,4
85
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
0
1
--
60
0
60
1
10
1
70
2
0
12
0
7
14
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
67
2
54
8
8
--
40
9
95
5
04
4
7
3
0
58
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
68
2
55
9
0
4,1
95
4
,60
8
26
0
4,8
68
8
1
03
0
4
,97
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
4
0
0
45
4
9
--
49
2
1
37
0
1
88
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
72
2
55
9
0
4,2
40
4
,65
7
26
0
4,9
17
1
0
24
0
0
5,1
67
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
O
the
r L
an
dto
:2
0
0
3
5
4
9
0
-
- 0
9
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
-
- 3
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
74
2
55
9
0
4,2
43
4
,66
2
26
4
4,9
26
1
0
27
0
0
5,2
06
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
SIE
RR
A V
AL
LE
Y
Page 65
TA
BL
E A
-38
SIS
KIY
OU
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
77
,20
8
74
,24
5
3,4
90
5
27
4
,01
7
-2,9
63
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e2
7,6
78
2
6,7
29
1
,21
0
26
1
1,4
71
-9
49
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
33
,00
8
33
,58
4
90
1
1,4
77
2
,37
8
57
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
61
6,6
70
6
24
,52
2
3,6
89
1
1,5
41
1
5,2
30
7
,85
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e9
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L7
54
,56
4
75
9,0
80
9
,29
0
13
,80
6
23
,09
6
4,5
16
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L9
G
razi
ng
La
nd
3
93
,89
3
38
7,8
86
6
,35
4
34
7
6,7
01
-6
,00
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
19
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
1,1
48
,45
7
1,1
46
,96
6
15
,64
4
14
,15
3
29
,79
7
-1,4
91
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
28
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d1
5,6
05
1
5,7
74
2
10
3
79
5
89
1
69
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d9
8,8
31
1
00
,15
3
24
2
1,5
64
1
,80
6
1,3
22
O
the
r L
an
d2
1
Wa
ter
Are
a1
8,3
99
1
8,3
99
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,28
1,2
92
1
,28
1,2
92
1
6,0
96
1
6,0
96
3
2,1
92
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D4
9
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 1
0
3
,45
2
3,4
53
1
6
3,4
69
3
1
8
0
3,4
90
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e (
1)
to:
0
--
1
1,2
02
1
,20
3
1
1,2
04
0
6
0
1
,21
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:4
0
-
- 8
52
8
56
2
3
87
9
1
21
0
9
01
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(2
)to
:4
75
2
59
1
,41
9
--
2,1
53
1
87
2
,34
0
22
3
1,1
26
0
3
,68
9
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
47
9
26
0
1,4
20
5
,50
6
7,6
65
2
27
7
,89
2
22
7
1,1
71
0
9
,29
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
4)
to:
26
1
4
8
5,8
71
5
,94
6
--
5,9
46
5
3
35
5
0
6,3
54
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
50
5
26
1
1,4
68
1
1,3
77
1
3,6
11
2
27
1
3,8
38
2
80
1
,52
6
0
15
,64
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(5
)to
:0
0
6
9
1
97
7
5
17
2
--
38
0
2
10
O
the
r L
an
dto
:2
2
0
3
73
9
8
45
1
43
9
9
--
0
24
2
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:5
27
2
61
1
,47
7
11
,54
1
13
,80
6
34
7
14
,15
3
37
9
1,5
64
0
1
6,0
96
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o ir
rig
ate
d f
arm
lan
d c
ate
go
rie
s is
du
e t
o n
ew
alf
alf
a a
nd
irri
ga
ted
ha
y in
Bu
tte
Va
lley
an
d S
ha
sta
Va
lley.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o O
the
r L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
de
line
ati
on
of
low
de
nsi
ty h
ou
sin
g in
va
rio
us
are
as
of
the
co
un
ty.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
ns
be
twe
en
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e a
nd
Gra
zin
g L
an
d d
ue
to
use
of
up
da
ted
da
ta o
n p
ub
lic la
nd
s a
nd
Will
iam
son
Ac
t c
on
tra
cts
to
de
line
ate
are
as
qu
alif
yin
g f
or
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e.
(5)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
SIS
KIY
OU
CO
UN
TY
Page 66
TA
BL
E A
-39
SO
LA
NO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
13
5,7
35
1
31
,82
0
4,4
98
5
83
5
,08
1
-3,9
15
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d2
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e7
,03
8
6,3
69
8
73
2
04
1
,07
7
-66
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
0,5
26
9
,27
5
1,5
40
2
89
1
,82
9
-1,2
51
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
15
3,2
99
1
47
,46
4
6,9
11
1
,07
6
7,9
87
-5
,83
5
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
20
4,5
19
2
09
,19
5
1,5
11
6
,18
7
7,6
98
4
,67
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
3,5
57
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
35
7,8
18
3
56
,65
9
8,4
22
7
,26
3
15
,68
5
-1,1
59
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
3,5
61
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d5
9,1
57
5
9,5
91
1
94
6
28
8
22
4
34
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d1
12
,08
7
11
2,6
61
4
20
9
94
1
,41
4
57
4
Oth
er
La
nd
77
3
Wa
ter
Are
a5
3,3
11
5
3,4
62
0
1
51
1
51
1
51
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
82
,37
3
58
2,3
73
9
,03
6
9,0
36
1
8,0
72
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D4
,33
4
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 2
2
0
4
3
,75
3
3,7
57
1
56
5
85
0
4
,49
8
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
1
0
3
81
7
82
0
24
2
9
0
87
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
1)
to:
3
1
--
0
4
1,4
55
1
,45
9
6
75
0
1
,54
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:0
0
0
-
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
3
3
0
1
1
6,0
25
6
,03
6
18
6
68
9
0
6,9
11
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:4
69
1
97
2
83
0
9
49
-
- 9
49
3
05
2
57
0
1
,51
1
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
74
2
00
2
86
0
9
60
6
,02
5
6,9
85
4
91
9
46
0
8
,42
2
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:3
1
0
0
0
31
1
15
1
46
-
- 4
8
0
19
4
Oth
er
La
nd
(3
)to
:7
8
4
3
0
85
4
7
13
2
13
7
--
15
1
42
0
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:5
83
2
04
2
89
0
1
,07
6
6,1
87
7
,26
3
62
8
99
4
15
1
9,0
36
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s, p
rim
ari
ly s
ou
the
ast
of
Va
ca
ville
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
fro
m U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
ck
of
suff
icie
nt
infr
ast
ruc
ture
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry t
o d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o W
ate
r d
ue
to
th
e f
loo
din
g o
f th
e s
ou
the
rn p
ort
ion
of
the
Lib
ert
y F
arm
s a
rea
fo
r th
e C
ac
he
Slo
ug
h A
rea
Re
sto
rati
on
Pro
jec
t.
SO
LA
NO
CO
UN
TY
Page 67
TA
BL
E A
-40
SO
NO
MA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
30
,81
4
29
,93
9
1,2
82
4
07
1
,68
9
-87
5
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
17
,25
2
17
,19
2
65
4
59
4
1,2
48
-6
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
2,1
06
3
2,9
24
5
62
1
,38
0
1,9
42
8
18
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e8
0,0
45
8
0,1
95
1
,81
4
1,9
64
3
,77
8
15
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e2
38
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
60
,21
7
16
0,2
50
4
,31
2
4,3
45
8
,65
7
33
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
47
G
razi
ng
La
nd
4
19
,00
4
41
7,7
73
1
,60
4
37
3
1,9
77
-1
,23
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
87
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
79
,22
1
57
8,0
23
5
,91
6
4,7
18
1
0,6
34
-1
,19
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,12
1
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
74
,74
1
75
,21
4
24
1
71
4
95
5
47
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
35
4,5
89
3
55
,31
4
90
6
1,6
31
2
,53
7
72
5
Oth
er
La
nd
44
9
Wa
ter
Are
a1
7,5
33
1
7,5
33
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,02
6,0
84
1
,02
6,0
84
7
,06
3
7,0
63
1
4,1
26
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
,57
0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 0
4
9
1,0
27
1
,07
6
53
1
,12
9
20
1
33
0
1
,28
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
5
--
6
49
0
50
1
50
5
51
9
9
4
0
65
4
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
dto
:7
7
-
- 1
47
1
61
2
05
3
66
1
6
18
0
0
56
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:2
35
3
15
3
41
-
- 8
91
4
8
93
9
22
5
65
0
0
1,8
14
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
47
3
22
3
96
1
,66
4
2,6
29
3
56
2
,98
5
27
0
1,0
57
0
4
,31
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
32
1
42
7
19
2
67
1
,16
0
--
1,1
60
7
0
37
4
0
1,6
04
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
27
9
46
4
1,1
15
1
,93
1
3,7
89
3
56
4
,14
5
34
0
1,4
31
0
5
,91
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:5
1
3
7
6
31
1
0
41
-
- 2
00
0
2
41
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
23
1
17
2
58
2
7
52
5
7
53
2
37
4
--
0
90
6
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:4
07
5
94
1
,38
0
1,9
64
4
,34
5
37
3
4,7
18
7
14
1
,63
1
0
7,0
63
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
t th
e f
orm
er
Sa
nta
Ro
sa A
ir C
en
ter
an
d t
he
use
of
de
taile
d d
igit
al i
ma
ge
ry
to d
elin
ea
te m
ore
dis
tin
ct
urb
an
bo
un
da
rie
s.
SO
NO
MA
CO
UN
TY
Page 68
TA
BL
E A
-41
ST
AN
ISL
AU
S C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
25
6,1
66
2
53
,43
5
3,8
09
1
,07
8
4,8
87
-2
,73
1
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
13
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
31
,44
8
31
,47
4
45
3
47
9
93
2
26
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e3
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d8
1,3
67
8
7,5
27
2
,10
0
8,2
60
1
0,3
60
6
,16
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
33
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
31
,16
0
31
,36
6
4,7
44
4
,95
0
9,6
94
2
06
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
27
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
00
,14
1
40
3,8
02
1
1,1
06
1
4,7
67
2
5,8
73
3
,66
1
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
42
3
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
43
4,1
37
4
29
,54
4
7,4
80
2
,88
7
10
,36
7
-4,5
93
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
56
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
83
4,2
78
8
33
,34
6
18
,58
6
17
,65
4
36
,24
0
-93
2
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
79
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d6
3,9
71
6
4,5
29
1
19
6
77
7
96
5
58
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d6
4,4
56
6
4,8
31
1
,35
1
1,7
26
3
,07
7
37
5
Oth
er
La
nd
52
8
Wa
ter
Are
a7
,46
6
7,4
65
1
0
1
-1
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
9
70
,17
1
97
0,1
71
2
0,0
57
2
0,0
57
4
0,1
14
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
,10
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 3
5
1
56
9
62
3
1,8
54
2
,47
7
36
0
97
2
0
3,8
09
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:4
-
- 1
0
13
0
14
4
15
4
29
8
9
14
6
0
45
3
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
3)
to:
9
0
--
1,6
70
1
,67
9
21
0
1,8
89
2
5
18
6
0
2,1
00
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(4
)to
:1
81
1
52
3
,93
9
--
4,2
72
3
39
4
,61
1
2
13
1
0
4,7
44
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
94
1
55
4
,00
0
2,3
69
6
,71
8
2,5
57
9
,27
5
39
6
1,4
35
0
1
1,1
06
G
razi
ng
La
nd
(4
)(5
)to
:4
33
2
30
3
,99
1
2,5
12
7
,16
6
--
7,1
66
5
8
25
6
0
7,4
80
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
62
7
38
5
7,9
91
4
,88
1
13
,88
4
2,5
57
1
6,4
41
4
54
1
,69
1
0
18
,58
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
37
2
2
7
1
67
1
7
84
-
- 3
5
0
11
9
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
41
4
92
2
42
6
8
81
6
31
3
1,1
29
2
22
-
- 0
1
,35
1
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
-
- 1
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:1
,07
8
47
9
8,2
60
4
,95
0
14
,76
7
2,8
87
1
7,6
54
6
77
1
,72
6
0
20
,05
7
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
is d
ue
to
th
e id
en
tifi
ca
tio
n o
f a
no
nir
rig
ate
d o
rch
ard
an
d p
ott
ed
pla
nt
nu
rse
rie
s o
n la
nd
pre
vio
usl
y m
ap
pe
d a
s ir
rig
ate
d f
arm
lan
d.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
is d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s, p
rim
ari
ly w
ith
in t
he
Sa
n J
oa
qu
in V
alle
y.(3
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o t
he
ide
nti
fic
ati
on
of
no
nir
rig
ate
d g
rain
an
d ir
rig
ate
d p
ast
ure
on
po
or
soils
.(4
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d is
du
e t
o n
ew
ly ir
rig
ate
d o
rch
ard
s, f
ield
cro
ps,
vin
eya
rds,
an
d o
the
r c
rop
s w
ith
in t
he
Sa
n J
oa
qu
in V
alle
y a
nd
th
e e
ast
ern
fo
oth
ills.
(5)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e id
en
tifi
ca
tio
n o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in a
lon
g t
he
ea
ste
rn e
dg
e o
f th
e S
an
Jo
aq
uin
Va
lley.
ST
AN
ISL
AU
S C
OU
NT
Y
Page 69
TA
BL
E A
-42
SU
TT
ER
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
16
5,3
15
1
62
,67
3
3,2
66
6
24
3
,89
0
-2,6
42
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
06
,59
7
10
5,3
95
1
,70
9
50
7
2,2
16
-1
,20
2
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
93
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
19
,15
6
17
,75
2
1,7
20
3
16
2
,03
6
-1,4
04
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
29
1,0
68
2
85
,82
0
6,6
95
1
,44
7
8,1
42
-5
,24
8
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
93
G
razi
ng
La
nd
5
2,5
71
5
3,5
38
1
,42
6
2,3
93
3
,81
9
96
7
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
68
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
34
3,6
39
3
39
,35
8
8,1
21
3
,84
0
11
,96
1
-4,2
81
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
16
1
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
13
,23
0
13
,56
0
25
3
55
3
80
3
30
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d3
0,5
62
3
4,5
13
6
70
4
,62
1
5,2
91
3
,95
1
Oth
er
La
nd
20
W
ate
r A
rea
1,8
83
1
,88
3
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
38
9,3
14
3
89
,31
4
8,8
16
8
,81
6
17
,63
2
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
18
1
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 0
1
0
1
1
,09
6
1,0
97
5
9
2,1
10
0
3
,26
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:1
-
- 0
0
1
1
,00
8
1,0
09
7
8
62
2
0
1,7
09
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(2
)to
:3
0
-
- 0
3
1
83
1
86
1
1
,53
3
0
1,7
20
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
4
0
1
0
5
2,2
87
2
,29
2
13
8
4,2
65
0
6
,69
5
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
47
6
31
0
26
3
0
1,0
49
-
- 1
,04
9
30
3
47
0
1
,42
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
80
3
10
2
64
0
1
,05
4
2,2
87
3
,34
1
16
8
4,6
12
0
8
,12
1
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
6
10
0
0
1
6
0
16
-
- 9
0
2
5
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
13
8
18
7
52
0
3
77
1
06
4
83
1
87
-
- 0
6
70
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
62
4
50
7
31
6
0
1,4
47
2
,39
3
3,8
40
3
55
4
,62
1
0
8,8
16
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
s to
Oth
er
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o b
ou
nd
ary
imp
rove
me
nts
alo
ng
th
e S
ac
ram
en
to R
ive
r a
nd
we
tla
nd
are
as
in t
he
Bu
tte
Sin
k, N
ato
ma
s B
asi
n, a
nd
Bu
tte
Slo
ug
h.
SU
TT
ER
CO
UN
TY
Page 70
TA
BL
E A
-43
TE
HA
MA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
63
,03
8
62
,17
5
1,9
81
1
,11
8
3,0
99
-8
63
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d9
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
17
,23
1
17
,30
4
49
9
57
2
1,0
71
7
3
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
2
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
8,0
54
1
9,5
65
2
44
1
,75
5
1,9
99
1
,51
1
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
13
2,6
08
1
32
,54
8
2,4
42
2
,38
2
4,8
24
-6
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e9
16
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
30
,93
1
23
1,5
92
5
,16
6
5,8
27
1
0,9
93
6
61
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,01
1
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
1,5
49
,80
0
1,5
47
,95
1
2,4
17
5
68
2
,98
5
-1,8
49
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
,88
5
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,78
0,7
31
1
,77
9,5
43
7
,58
3
6,3
95
1
3,9
78
-1
,18
8
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
,89
6
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
13
,63
3
13
,80
5
48
2
20
2
68
1
72
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d3
8,9
48
3
9,9
64
2
73
1
,28
9
1,5
62
1
,01
6
Oth
er
La
nd
61
1
Wa
ter
Are
a6
,18
2
6,1
82
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
1
,83
9,4
94
1
,83
9,4
94
7
,90
4
7,9
04
1
5,8
08
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D3
,50
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 3
1
5
1,7
48
1
,76
6
5
1,7
71
2
5
18
5
0
1,9
81
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:6
-
- 0
4
31
4
37
0
4
37
2
5
37
0
4
99
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
6
3
--
6
15
1
07
1
22
1
1
21
0
2
44
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(2
)to
:1
,00
5
55
1
51
-
- 1
,60
7
40
3
2,0
10
3
9
39
3
0
2,4
42
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,01
7
55
7
66
2
,18
5
3,8
25
5
15
4
,34
0
90
7
36
0
5
,16
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
3)
to:
11
1
1
,60
0
17
2
1,7
84
-
- 1
,78
4
83
5
50
0
2
,41
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,02
8
55
8
1,6
66
2
,35
7
5,6
09
5
15
6
,12
4
17
3
1,2
86
0
7
,58
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
to:
13
1
0
9
2
3
22
4
5
--
3
0
48
O
the
r L
an
dto
:7
7
13
8
9
16
1
95
3
1
22
6
47
-
- 0
2
73
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
1,1
18
5
72
1
,75
5
2,3
82
5
,82
7
56
8
6,3
95
2
20
1
,28
9
0
7,9
04
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f ir
rig
ate
d r
ow
cro
ps
an
d ir
rig
ate
d p
ast
ure
.(3
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f ir
rig
ate
d r
ow
cro
ps
in v
ari
ou
s lo
ca
tio
ns
of
the
co
un
ty.
TE
HA
MA
CO
UN
TY
Page 71
TA
BL
E A
-44
TU
LA
RE
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
37
5,1
19
3
70
,24
9
6,0
71
1
,20
1
7,2
72
-4
,87
0
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
15
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
32
7,2
04
3
23
,59
9
6,6
06
3
,00
1
9,6
07
-3
,60
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
29
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
11
,91
9
11
,59
3
54
5
21
9
76
4
-32
6
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
15
0,1
93
1
54
,55
0
4,2
80
8
,63
7
12
,91
7
4,3
57
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
30
4
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
86
4,4
35
8
59
,99
1
17
,50
2
13
,05
8
30
,56
0
-4,4
44
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
93
G
razi
ng
La
nd
4
39
,85
1
44
0,0
42
2
46
4
37
6
83
1
91
G
razi
ng
La
nd
9
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,30
4,2
86
1
,30
0,0
33
1
7,7
48
1
3,4
95
3
1,2
43
-4
,25
3
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
90
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d5
7,9
47
5
9,9
44
9
3
2,0
90
2
,18
3
1,9
97
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d2
18
,98
0
22
1,2
36
1
,14
4
3,4
00
4
,54
4
2,2
56
O
the
r L
an
d1
57
W
ate
r A
rea
4,6
56
4
,65
6
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
1,5
85
,86
9
1,5
85
,86
9
18
,98
5
18
,98
5
37
,97
0
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
74
7
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 4
1
9
3,1
46
3
,16
9
4
3,1
73
1
,45
0
1,4
48
0
6
,07
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(1
)(2
)to
:4
-
- 1
4
5,2
17
5
,23
5
0
5,2
35
1
96
1
,17
5
0
6,6
06
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
7
1
--
16
6
17
4
23
6
41
0
7
12
8
0
54
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
3)
to:
83
6
2,4
79
4
6
--
3,3
61
1
29
3
,49
0
32
5
46
5
0
4,2
80
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L8
47
2
,48
4
79
8
,52
9
11
,93
9
36
9
12
,30
8
1,9
78
3
,21
6
0
17
,50
2
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
to:
0
0
90
2
9
11
9
--
11
9
2
12
5
0
24
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L8
47
2
,48
4
16
9
8,5
58
1
2,0
58
3
69
1
2,4
27
1
,98
0
3,3
41
0
1
7,7
48
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d (
4)
to:
12
7
0
1
5
34
0
3
4
--
59
0
9
3
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
34
2
51
0
50
6
4
96
6
68
1
,03
4
11
0
--
0
1,1
44
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
--
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
1,2
01
3
,00
1
21
9
8,6
37
1
3,0
58
4
37
1
3,4
95
2
,09
0
3,4
00
0
1
8,9
85
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
s to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
lan
d le
ft id
le f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s a
nd
th
e e
xpa
nsi
on
of
Co
nfi
ne
d L
ive
sto
ck
fac
iliti
es.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
ns
to O
the
r L
an
d p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f w
etl
an
ds
ne
ar
An
gio
la, l
ow
-de
nsi
ty h
ou
sin
g a
nd
lan
d g
rad
ed
fo
r d
eve
lop
me
nt.
(3)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o ir
rig
ate
d f
arm
lan
d c
ate
go
rie
s la
rge
ly d
ue
to
th
e a
dd
itio
n o
f ir
rig
ate
d c
rop
s a
nd
orc
ha
rds,
sc
att
ere
d t
hro
ug
ho
ut
the
co
un
ty.
(4)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
is p
rim
ari
ly d
ue
to
lac
k o
f su
ffic
ien
t in
fra
stru
ctu
re a
nd
th
e u
se o
f d
eta
iled
dig
ita
l im
ag
ery
to
de
line
ate
mo
re d
isti
nc
t u
rba
n b
ou
nd
ari
es.
TU
LA
RE
CO
UN
TY
Page 72
TA
BL
E A
-45
VE
NT
UR
A C
OU
NT
Y2
00
8-2
01
0 L
an
d U
se C
on
vers
ion
CA
LIF
OR
NIA
DE
PA
RT
ME
NT
OF
CO
NS
ER
VA
TIO
ND
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
arm
lan
d M
ap
pin
g a
nd
Mo
nit
ori
ng
Pro
gra
m
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
43
,79
1
42
,42
0
1,7
87
4
16
2
,20
3
-1,3
71
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d2
84
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e3
3,8
41
3
3,4
82
7
02
3
43
1
,04
5
-35
9
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
16
5
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d2
8,6
43
2
8,7
93
1
,53
5
1,6
85
3
,22
0
15
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d1
18
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
16
,21
8
14
,98
8
2,2
60
1
,03
0
3,2
90
-1
,23
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e7
32
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
22
,49
3
11
9,6
83
6
,28
4
3,4
74
9
,75
8
-2,8
10
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L1
,29
9
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
19
5,6
74
1
97
,27
8
74
3
2,3
47
3
,09
0
1,6
04
G
razi
ng
La
nd
3
,69
4
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
18
,16
7
31
6,9
61
7
,02
7
5,8
21
1
2,8
48
-1
,20
6
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L4
,99
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
10
4,2
80
1
05
,23
3
10
8
1,0
61
1
,16
9
95
3
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
12
9,5
63
1
29
,81
6
1,2
42
1
,49
5
2,7
37
2
53
O
the
r L
an
d1
,37
5
Wa
ter
Are
a3
,93
9
3,9
39
0
0
0
0
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
5
55
,94
9
55
5,9
49
8
,37
7
8,3
77
1
6,7
54
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D6
,36
8
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 3
5
83
6
95
1
,28
1
9
1,2
90
2
07
2
90
0
1
,78
7
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
(1
)to
:1
-
- 2
42
2
44
4
87
1
0
49
7
11
7
88
0
7
02
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
(2
)to
:3
6
7
--
20
6
3
1,0
27
1
,09
0
30
4
15
0
1
,53
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e (
2)
to:
17
2
16
3
18
3
--
51
8
1,2
72
1
,79
0
10
8
36
2
0
2,2
60
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
09
1
73
1
,00
8
95
9
2,3
49
2
,31
8
4,6
67
4
62
1
,15
5
0
6,2
84
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:6
4
2
87
4
2
33
9
--
33
9
83
3
21
0
7
43
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
21
5
17
7
1,2
95
1
,00
1
2,6
88
2
,31
8
5,0
06
5
45
1
,47
6
0
7,0
27
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:2
0
23
4
4
2
89
0
8
9
--
19
0
1
08
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
81
1
43
3
46
2
7
69
7
29
7
26
5
16
-
- 0
1
,24
2
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:4
16
3
43
1
,68
5
1,0
30
3
,47
4
2,3
47
5
,82
1
1,0
61
1
,49
5
0
8,3
77
(1
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d is
du
e t
o t
he
ide
nti
fic
ati
on
of
po
tte
d p
lan
t n
urs
eri
es
on
lan
d p
revi
ou
sly
ma
pp
ed
as
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d is
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o ir
rig
ate
d c
rop
s o
r n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
in f
ield
s le
ft f
allo
w f
or
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.
VE
NT
UR
A C
OU
NT
Y
Page 73
TA
BL
E A
-46
YO
LO
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
25
5,1
93
2
52
,08
3
3,6
61
5
51
4
,21
2
-3,1
10
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d2
32
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
6,7
93
1
6,4
12
5
68
1
87
7
55
-3
81
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e0
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
45
,75
0
43
,62
9
3,0
71
9
50
4
,02
1
-2,1
21
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
21
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
60
,34
5
62
,41
0
3,0
96
5
,16
1
8,2
57
2
,06
5
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e3
23
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
78
,08
1
37
4,5
34
1
0,3
96
6
,84
9
17
,24
5
-3,5
47
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L5
76
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
57
,96
3
16
0,4
50
2
,33
7
4,8
24
7
,16
1
2,4
87
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
18
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
53
6,0
44
5
34
,98
4
12
,73
3
11
,67
3
24
,40
6
-1,0
60
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
69
4
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
30
,22
5
30
,53
7
20
3
32
3
52
3
12
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
d0
O
the
r L
an
d7
9,3
70
8
0,1
28
6
93
1
,45
1
2,1
44
7
58
O
the
r L
an
d5
50
W
ate
r A
rea
7,8
14
7
,80
4
10
0
1
0
-10
W
ate
r A
rea
0
TO
TA
L A
RE
A IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
6
53
,45
3
65
3,4
53
1
3,4
56
1
3,4
56
2
6,9
12
0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E R
EP
OR
TE
D1
,24
4
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)(2
)to
: -
- 2
9
3
2,7
55
2
,85
0
4
2,8
54
1
48
6
59
0
3
,66
1
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
to:
2
--
6
49
6
50
4
2
50
6
10
5
2
0
56
8
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d (
3)
to:
9
3
--
81
9
3
2,8
15
2
,90
8
4
15
9
0
3,0
71
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
(3
)to
:3
35
1
80
1
93
-
- 7
08
1
,89
7
2,6
05
2
2
46
9
0
3,0
96
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
46
1
85
2
92
3
,33
2
4,1
55
4
,71
8
8,8
73
1
84
1
,33
9
0
10
,39
6
Gra
zin
g L
an
d (
2)
to:
1
1
49
6
1,7
22
2
,22
0
--
2,2
20
5
1
12
0
2
,33
7
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L3
47
1
86
7
88
5
,05
4
6,3
75
4
,71
8
11
,09
3
18
9
1,4
51
0
1
2,7
33
U
rba
n a
nd
Bu
ilt-u
p L
an
dto
:1
3
0
5
2
20
0
2
0
--
0
0
20
O
the
r L
an
dto
:1
91
1
1
57
1
05
4
54
1
06
5
60
1
33
-
- 0
6
93
W
ate
r A
rea
to:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
-
- 1
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
CO
NV
ER
TE
D
to:
55
1
18
7
95
0
5,1
61
6
,84
9
4,8
24
1
1,6
73
3
32
1
,45
1
0
13
,45
6
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
du
e t
o t
he
ide
nti
fic
ati
on
of
no
nir
rig
ate
d o
rch
ard
s p
revi
ou
sly
ma
pp
ed
as
irri
ga
ted
fa
rmla
nd
.(2
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e d
ue
to
th
e c
rop
pin
g o
f n
on
irri
ga
ted
gra
ins
for
thre
e o
r m
ore
up
da
te c
ycle
s.(3
) C
on
vers
ion
to
Gra
zin
g L
an
d la
rge
ly d
ue
to
irri
ga
ted
cro
ps
or
no
nir
rig
ate
d g
rain
fie
lds
left
fa
llow
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
YO
LO
CO
UN
TY
Page 74
TA
BL
E A
-47
YU
BA
CO
UN
TY
20
08
-20
10
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
nC
AL
IFO
RN
IA D
EP
AR
TM
EN
T O
F C
ON
SE
RV
AT
ION
Div
isio
n o
f L
an
d R
eso
urc
e P
rote
cti
on
Fa
rmla
nd
Ma
pp
ing
an
d M
on
ito
rin
g P
rog
ram
PA
RT
I
PA
RT
IIC
ou
nty
Su
mm
ary
an
d C
ha
ng
e b
y L
an
d U
se C
ate
go
ryL
an
d C
om
mit
ted
to
No
na
gri
cu
ltu
ral U
se
20
08
-10
AC
RE
AG
E C
HA
NG
ES
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
ES
AC
RE
ST
OT
AL
NE
T
TO
TA
LL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
INV
EN
TO
RIE
DL
OS
TG
AIN
ED
AC
RE
AG
EA
CR
EA
GE
LA
ND
US
E C
AT
EG
OR
YA
CR
EA
GE
20
08
20
10
(-)
(+)
CH
AN
GE
DC
HA
NG
ED
20
10
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
41
,37
1
39
,48
5
2,1
91
3
05
2
,49
6
-1,8
86
P
rim
e F
arm
lan
d0
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
e1
0,9
75
1
0,8
29
1
64
1
8
18
2
-14
6
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Sta
tew
ide
Imp
ort
an
ce
0
Un
iqu
e F
arm
lan
d3
2,6
06
3
2,2
24
1
,02
6
64
4
1,6
70
-3
82
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
0
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Lo
ca
l Im
po
rta
nc
e0
0
0
0
0
0
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
84
,95
2
82
,53
8
3,3
81
9
67
4
,34
8
-2,4
14
IM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L0
G
razi
ng
La
nd
1
41
,63
9
14
1,5
09
1
,86
9
1,7
39
3
,60
8
-13
0
Gra
zin
g L
an
d
0
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
26
,59
1
22
4,0
47
5
,25
0
2,7
06
7
,95
6
-2,5
44
A
GR
ICU
LT
UR
AL
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
13
,66
9
14
,02
6
10
7
46
4
57
1
35
7
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
0
Oth
er
La
nd
16
5,1
26
1
67
,31
3
43
0
2,6
17
3
,04
7
2,1
87
O
the
r L
an
d0
W
ate
r A
rea
6,6
29
6
,62
9
0
0
0
0
Wa
ter
Are
a0
T
OT
AL
AR
EA
INV
EN
TO
RIE
D
41
2,0
15
4
12
,01
5
5,7
87
5
,78
7
11
,57
4
0
TO
TA
L A
CR
EA
GE
RE
PO
RT
ED
0
PA
RT
III
La
nd
Use
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
20
08
to
20
10
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Fa
rmla
nd
of
Su
bto
tal
To
tal
Urb
an
an
dT
ota
lL
AN
D U
SE
CA
TE
GO
RY
Pri
me
Sta
tew
ide
Un
iqu
eL
oc
al
Imp
ort
an
tG
razi
ng
Ag
ric
ult
ura
lB
uilt
-up
Oth
er
Wa
ter
Co
nve
rte
d T
oF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dIm
po
rta
nc
eF
arm
lan
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dL
an
dA
rea
An
oth
er
Use
Pri
me
Fa
rmla
nd
(1
)to
: -
- 2
2
0
4
1
,28
2
1,2
86
2
2
88
3
0
2,1
91
F
arm
lan
d o
f S
tate
wid
e Im
po
rta
nc
eto
:2
-
- 0
0
2
5
5
57
6
1
01
0
1
64
U
niq
ue
Fa
rmla
nd
to:
9
2
--
0
11
3
34
3
45
5
0
63
1
0
1,0
26
F
arm
lan
d o
f L
oc
al I
mp
ort
an
ce
to:
0
0
0
--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
SU
BT
OT
AL
11
4
2
0
1
7
1,6
71
1
,68
8
78
1
,61
5
0
3,3
81
G
razi
ng
La
nd
to
:2
59
9
5
88
0
8
56
-
- 8
56
1
10
9
03
0
1
,86
9
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
L L
AN
D S
UB
TO
TA
L2
70
1
3
59
0
0
87
3
1,6
71
2
,54
4
18
8
2,5
18
0
5
,25
0
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
(2
)to
:4
0
3
0
7
1
8
-
- 9
9
0
10
7
Oth
er
La
nd
to:
31
5
5
1
0
87
6
7
15
4
27
6
--
0
43
0
Wa
ter
Are
ato
:0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
- 0
T
OT
AL
AC
RE
AG
E C
ON
VE
RT
ED
to
:3
05
1
8
64
4
0
96
7
1,7
39
2
,70
6
46
4
2,6
17
0
5
,78
7
(1)
Co
nve
rsio
n t
o G
razi
ng
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
du
e t
o la
nd
left
idle
fo
r th
ree
or
mo
re u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
(2)
Co
nve
rsio
n f
rom
Urb
an
an
d B
uilt
-up
La
nd
pri
ma
rily
th
e r
esu
lt o
f a
rea
s o
n B
ea
le A
FB
no
ted
fo
r a
lac
k o
f st
ruc
ture
s fo
r si
x u
pd
ate
cyc
les.
YU
BA
CO
UN
TY
Page 75
Page 76
Appendix B
2008 and 2010 County Acreage Tallies
TA
BL
E B
-1C
alif
orn
ia D
ep
art
me
nt
of
Co
nse
rva
tio
nIM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
D A
CR
EA
GE
SU
MM
AR
Y 2
00
8D
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
AR
ML
AN
D M
AP
PIN
G A
ND
MO
NIT
OR
ING
PR
OG
RA
M
IMP
OR
TA
NT
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
LU
RB
AN
&C
OU
NT
Y A
RE
AP
ER
CE
NT
CO
UN
TY
AR
EA
TO
TA
LC
OU
NT
YIM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
DF
AR
ML
AN
DG
RA
ZIN
G
LA
ND
BU
ILT
-UP
OT
HE
RW
AT
ER
IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
MA
PP
ED
NO
TC
OU
NT
Y A
RE
AP
RIM
ES
TA
TE
WID
EU
NIQ
UE
LO
CA
LS
UB
TO
TA
LL
AN
DS
UB
TO
TA
LL
AN
DL
AN
DA
RE
A(4
)(1
)IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
(2)(
4)
Ala
me
da
3,9
58
1
,29
0
2,4
41
0
7
,68
9
24
4,2
52
2
51
,94
1
14
6,0
75
7
3,5
22
5
3,7
99
5
25
,33
7
10
0%
0
52
5,3
38
A
ma
do
r3
,54
1
1,5
73
3
,67
8
1,4
85
1
0,2
77
1
88
,11
5
19
8,3
92
8
,19
5
88
,46
3
5,3
23
3
00
,37
3
77
%8
7,4
52
3
87
,82
5
Bu
tte
19
4,6
89
2
2,7
94
2
3,0
78
0
2
40
,56
1
40
1,8
59
6
42
,42
0
45
,35
0
36
2,6
24
2
2,8
58
1
,07
3,2
52
1
00
%0
1
,07
3,2
53
C
olu
sa1
97
,49
7
2,0
12
1
21
,18
6
23
5,0
23
5
55
,71
8
9,1
11
5
64
,82
9
5,1
11
1
68
,54
2
1,9
11
7
40
,39
3
10
0%
0
74
0,3
93
C
on
tra
Co
sta
26
,78
9
7,5
55
3
,12
5
53
,44
9
90
,91
8
16
8,9
04
2
59
,82
2
15
1,3
36
4
9,0
98
5
3,7
64
5
14
,02
0
10
0%
0
51
4,0
20
E
l Do
rad
o7
71
9
21
3
,76
6
59
,64
8
65
,10
6
19
4,7
78
2
59
,88
4
32
,19
4
23
7,5
07
6
,81
9
53
6,4
04
4
7%
60
8,5
19
1
,14
4,9
23
F
resn
o6
93
,17
4
43
9,0
20
9
4,1
77
1
49
,90
7
1,3
76
,27
8
82
6,9
53
2
,20
3,2
31
1
17
,56
7
11
1,7
02
4
,91
4
2,4
37
,41
4
63
%1
,40
8,8
97
3
,84
6,3
11
G
len
n1
59
,81
1
87
,49
7
17
,30
6
83
,54
4
34
8,1
58
2
27
,39
1
57
5,5
49
6
,37
2
26
1,2
58
5
,95
0
84
9,1
29
1
00
%0
8
49
,12
8
Imp
eri
al
19
5,5
88
3
11
,04
7
2,1
97
3
2,1
09
5
40
,94
1
0
54
0,9
41
2
7,7
09
4
58
,82
9
1,0
29
1
,02
8,5
08
3
6%
1,8
39
,91
8
2,8
68
,42
6
Ke
rn6
26
,21
7
21
6,3
47
9
6,6
57
0
9
39
,22
1
1,8
07
,06
9
2,7
46
,29
0
13
8,6
96
2
,32
9,3
96
9
,88
0
5,2
24
,26
2
10
0%
0
5,2
24
,26
2
Kin
gs
13
8,0
89
3
97
,06
5
22
,92
8
10
,02
2
56
8,1
04
2
57
,74
6
82
5,8
50
3
2,2
20
3
2,6
54
6
2
89
0,7
86
1
00
%0
8
90
,78
5
La
ke1
3,6
36
1
,09
9
11
,77
2
21
,01
2
47
,51
9
23
9,7
65
2
87
,28
4
15
,12
6
50
1,6
36
4
6,7
93
8
50
,83
9
10
0%
0
85
0,8
41
L
os
An
ge
les
32
,40
6
1,2
28
1
,17
7
7,1
93
4
2,0
04
2
29
,47
4
27
1,4
78
1
70
,86
4
67
8,2
51
3
,46
8
1,1
24
,06
1
43
%1
,48
8,6
13
2
,61
2,6
74
M
ad
era
97
,49
1
85
,13
6
16
3,9
73
1
6,1
43
3
62
,74
3
39
9,5
01
7
62
,24
4
27
,01
0
65
,73
4
6,0
55
8
61
,04
3
63
%5
16
,49
2
1,3
77
,53
5
Ma
rin
7
46
1
29
9
65
,15
4
65
,92
1
89
,55
6
15
5,4
77
4
2,1
81
1
36
,18
5
44
,81
9
37
8,6
62
1
00
%0
3
78
,66
1
Ma
rip
osa
6
41
2
84
0
3
31
4
03
,76
9
40
4,1
00
2
,42
3
75
,87
4
6,0
47
4
88
,44
4
52
%4
47
,15
3
93
5,5
97
M
en
do
cin
o2
1,1
07
1
,36
5
7,2
19
0
2
9,6
91
1
,92
7,0
16
1
,95
6,7
07
1
9,1
94
6
6,8
08
2
,13
5
2,0
44
,84
4
91
%2
03
,24
8
2,2
48
,09
3
Me
rce
d2
70
,64
1
15
0,8
75
1
03
,99
0
67
,98
5
59
3,4
91
5
67
,39
2
1,1
60
,88
3
37
,41
9
50
,45
6
16
,85
9
1,2
65
,61
7
10
0%
0
1,2
65
,61
8
Mo
do
c7
9,2
50
4
4,5
42
1
3,9
71
1
48
,17
6
28
5,9
39
8
14
,86
0
1,1
00
,79
9
3,4
30
2
2,7
43
5
7,2
65
1
,18
4,2
37
4
4%
1,5
05
,44
4
2,6
89
,68
1
Mo
nte
rey
16
6,8
12
4
3,0
91
2
4,7
68
0
2
34
,67
1
1,0
66
,49
4
1,3
01
,16
5
56
,53
4
75
7,1
82
6
,24
6
2,1
21
,12
7
10
0%
0
2,1
21
,12
7
Na
pa
31
,74
2
9,7
98
1
6,3
26
1
8,4
90
7
6,3
56
1
78
,95
7
25
5,3
13
2
3,3
28
2
04
,82
5
22
,39
7
50
5,8
63
1
00
%0
5
05
,85
9
Ne
vad
a5
14
2
,28
5
50
0
22
,66
4
25
,96
3
11
6,8
66
1
42
,82
9
17
,50
6
12
8,9
08
2
,14
5
29
1,3
88
4
7%
33
2,4
48
6
23
,83
6
Ora
ng
e3
,77
2
44
1
4,2
09
0
8
,42
2
37
,55
4
45
,97
6
28
7,9
23
1
74
,84
3
97
2
50
9,7
14
1
00
%0
5
09
,71
2
Pla
ce
r7
,89
4
4,8
23
2
0,1
95
1
01
,01
1
13
3,9
23
2
4,4
48
1
58
,37
1
58
,62
2
18
9,4
58
5
,01
1
41
1,4
62
4
3%
54
8,5
58
9
60
,02
0
Riv
ers
ide
12
2,9
35
4
4,6
53
3
7,1
33
2
29
,15
6
43
3,8
77
1
11
,21
9
54
5,0
96
3
15
,67
9
1,0
21
,33
6
62
,35
0
1,9
44
,46
1
42
%2
,72
8,4
40
4
,67
2,9
01
S
ac
ram
en
to1
04
,36
6
49
,47
0
15
,46
3
43
,81
9
21
3,1
18
1
56
,14
4
36
9,2
62
1
77
,91
5
70
,75
7
18
,14
7
63
6,0
81
1
00
%0
6
36
,08
3
Sa
n B
en
ito
28
,70
1
6,5
87
2
,39
9
23
,23
4
60
,92
1
61
2,4
55
6
73
,37
6
7,9
02
2
06
,96
8
1,1
40
8
89
,38
6
10
0%
0
88
9,3
88
S
an
Be
rna
rdin
o1
4,0
90
6
,74
7
2,6
61
1
,82
8
25
,32
6
90
1,6
66
9
26
,99
2
27
5,6
95
2
46
,41
3
44
9
1,4
49
,54
9
11
%1
1,4
18
,24
0
12
,86
7,7
89
S
an
Die
go
7,7
54
1
0,4
12
5
1,9
75
1
53
,18
6
22
3,3
27
1
26
,87
1
35
0,1
98
3
50
,50
0
1,4
52
,69
8
13
,29
8
2,1
66
,69
4
80
%5
45
,50
6
2,7
12
,20
0
Sa
n J
oa
qu
in3
96
,98
4
86
,29
7
66
,62
1
65
,78
8
61
5,6
90
1
42
,46
0
75
8,1
50
9
0,5
29
5
2,1
41
1
1,7
73
9
12
,59
3
10
0%
0
91
2,6
00
S
an
Lu
is O
bis
po
41
,56
9
21
,10
9
38
,77
7
30
9,0
81
4
10
,53
6
1,1
83
,04
2
1,5
93
,57
8
44
,39
2
23
9,0
45
1
0,5
21
1
,88
7,5
36
8
9%
23
6,6
71
2
,12
4,2
07
S
an
Ma
teo
2,2
21
1
42
2
,18
2
93
7
5,4
82
4
8,9
59
5
4,4
41
7
1,8
72
1
61
,40
5
65
,73
4
35
3,4
52
1
00
%0
3
53
,45
0
Sa
nta
Ba
rba
ra6
7,1
70
1
2,2
98
3
4,7
79
1
1,1
06
1
25
,35
3
58
1,9
85
7
07
,33
8
62
,33
4
26
5,4
67
4
,19
1
1,0
39
,33
0
59
%7
18
,86
9
1,7
58
,19
9
Sa
nta
Cla
ra1
8,8
04
4
,02
8
2,4
89
5
,96
7
31
,28
8
39
0,0
91
4
21
,37
9
18
8,8
82
2
16
,50
4
8,4
58
8
35
,22
3
10
0%
0
83
5,2
25
S
an
ta C
ruz
14
,35
7
2,7
06
4
,24
9
51
6
21
,82
8
17
,95
2
39
,78
0
32
,01
3
21
3,5
63
3
57
2
85
,71
3
10
0%
0
28
5,7
09
S
ha
sta
12
,28
9
3,2
87
5
09
6
,10
4
22
,18
9
41
2,7
31
4
34
,92
0
36
,64
0
54
3,7
73
5
,87
5
1,0
21
,20
8
41
%1
,44
3,9
65
2
,46
5,1
73
S
ierr
a V
alle
y (3
)8
,72
4
7,4
74
3
,79
3
89
,30
2
10
9,2
93
7
9,5
00
1
88
,79
3
99
9
7,9
03
7
5
19
7,7
70
4
%5
,11
1,5
96
5
,30
9,3
66
S
iski
you
7
7,2
08
2
7,6
78
3
3,0
08
6
16
,67
0
75
4,5
64
3
93
,89
3
1,1
48
,45
7
15
,60
5
98
,83
1
18
,39
9
1,2
81
,29
2
32
%2
,78
0,9
33
4
,06
2,2
25
S
ola
no
13
5,7
35
7
,03
8
10
,52
6
0
15
3,2
99
2
04
,51
9
35
7,8
18
5
9,1
57
1
12
,08
7
53
,31
1
58
2,3
73
1
00
%0
5
82
,37
1
So
no
ma
30
,81
4
17
,25
2
32
,10
6
80
,04
5
16
0,2
17
4
19
,00
4
57
9,2
21
7
4,7
41
3
54
,58
9
17
,53
3
1,0
26
,08
4
10
0%
0
1,0
26
,08
5
Sta
nis
lau
s2
56
,16
6
31
,44
8
81
,36
7
31
,16
0
40
0,1
41
4
34
,13
7
83
4,2
78
6
3,9
71
6
4,4
56
7
,46
6
97
0,1
71
1
00
%0
9
70
,16
9
Su
tte
r1
65
,31
5
10
6,5
97
1
9,1
56
0
2
91
,06
8
52
,57
1
34
3,6
39
1
3,2
30
3
0,5
62
1
,88
3
38
9,3
14
1
00
%0
3
89
,31
3
Te
ha
ma
63
,03
8
17
,23
1
18
,05
4
13
2,6
08
2
30
,93
1
1,5
49
,80
0
1,7
80
,73
1
13
,63
3
38
,94
8
6,1
82
1
,83
9,4
94
9
7%
53
,40
6
1,8
92
,90
0
Tu
lare
37
5,1
19
3
27
,20
4
11
,91
9
15
0,1
93
8
64
,43
5
43
9,8
51
1
,30
4,2
86
5
7,9
47
2
18
,98
0
4,6
56
1
,58
5,8
69
5
1%
1,5
13
,40
7
3,0
99
,27
6
Ve
ntu
ra4
3,7
91
3
3,8
41
2
8,6
43
1
6,2
18
1
22
,49
3
19
5,6
74
3
18
,16
7
10
4,2
80
1
29
,56
3
3,9
39
5
55
,94
9
47
%6
31
,90
2
1,1
87
,85
1
Yo
lo
25
5,1
93
1
6,7
93
4
5,7
50
6
0,3
45
3
78
,08
1
15
7,9
63
5
36
,04
4
30
,22
5
79
,37
0
7,8
14
6
53
,45
3
10
0%
0
65
3,4
52
Y
ub
a4
1,3
71
1
0,9
75
3
2,6
06
0
8
4,9
52
1
41
,63
9
22
6,5
91
1
3,6
69
1
65
,12
6
6,6
29
4
12
,01
5
10
0%
0
41
2,0
14
TO
TA
L (
4)
5,2
49
,11
6
2,6
83
,57
3
1,3
35
,38
7
3,1
20
,27
8
12
,38
8,3
54
1
9,1
75
,95
6
31
,56
4,3
10
3
,57
4,1
95
1
3,2
16
,98
3
71
6,7
01
4
9,0
72
,18
9
36
,16
9,6
77
8
5,2
41
,86
4
(1)
Co
un
tie
s th
at
are
no
t c
om
ple
tely
inve
nto
rie
d t
ypic
ally
co
nta
in la
rge
pu
blic
lan
d h
old
ing
s, s
uc
h a
s N
ati
on
al F
ore
sts,
th
at
are
no
t c
ove
red
by
mo
de
rn s
oil
surv
eys
. (2
) T
ota
l Co
un
ty A
rea
fig
ure
s a
re c
alc
ula
ted
fro
m a
sta
tew
ide
GIS
co
un
ty b
ou
nd
ary
file
ava
ilab
le t
hro
ug
h t
he
Ca
lifo
rnia
Sp
ati
al I
nfo
rma
tio
n L
ibra
ry.
(3)
La
sse
n, P
lum
as,
an
d S
ierr
a c
ou
nti
es
are
inc
lud
ed
wit
hin
th
e t
ri-c
ou
nty
are
a r
efe
rre
d t
o a
s "S
ierr
a V
alle
y" in
th
e U
SD
A-N
RC
S s
oil
surv
ey
for
tha
t re
gio
n.
(4)
Ca
teg
ory
an
d A
rea
Inve
nto
rie
d t
ota
ls m
ay
dif
fer
slig
htl
y fr
om
sta
tew
ide
co
nve
rsio
n t
ab
le d
ue
to
ro
un
din
g.
Sim
ilarl
y, m
ino
r d
isc
rep
an
cie
s o
cc
ur
be
twe
en
th
e F
MM
P in
ven
tori
ed
are
a a
nd
th
e s
tate
wid
e G
IS d
ata
se
t a
cre
ag
e d
ue
to
ro
un
din
g.
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
AC
RE
AG
E S
UM
MA
RY
20
08
Page 77
TA
BL
E B
-2C
alif
orn
ia D
ep
art
me
nt
of
Co
nse
rva
tio
nD
ivis
ion
of
La
nd
Re
sou
rce
Pro
tec
tio
nF
AR
ML
AN
D M
AP
PIN
G A
ND
MO
NIT
OR
ING
PR
OG
RA
M
IMP
OR
TA
NT
AG
RIC
UL
TU
RA
LU
RB
AN
&C
OU
NT
Y A
RE
AP
ER
CE
NT
CO
UN
TY
AR
EA
TO
TA
LC
OU
NT
YIM
PO
RT
AN
T F
AR
ML
AN
DF
AR
ML
AN
DG
RA
ZIN
G
LA
ND
BU
ILT
-UP
OT
HE
RW
AT
ER
IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
MA
PP
ED
NO
TC
OU
NT
Y A
RE
AP
RIM
ES
TA
TE
WID
EU
NIQ
UE
LO
CA
LS
UB
TO
TA
LL
AN
DS
UB
TO
TA
LL
AN
DL
AN
DA
RE
A(4
)(1
)IN
VE
NT
OR
IED
(2)(
4)
Ala
me
da
3,9
53
1
,23
0
2,3
83
0
7
,56
6
24
4,0
33
2
51
,59
9
14
6,2
63
7
3,5
95
5
3,8
80
5
25
,33
7
10
0%
0
52
5,3
38
A
ma
do
r3
,21
1
1,4
21
3
,33
5
1,8
64
9
,83
1
18
8,4
33
1
98
,26
4
8,2
95
8
8,4
91
5
,32
3
30
0,3
73
7
7%
87
,45
2
38
7,8
25
B
utt
e1
93
,29
0
21
,87
1
22
,19
0
0
23
7,3
51
4
02
,99
9
64
0,3
50
4
5,9
14
3
64
,13
0
22
,85
8
1,0
73
,25
2
10
0%
0
1,0
73
,25
3
Co
lusa
19
6,3
20
2
,04
6
12
0,3
16
2
36
,01
3
55
4,6
95
9
,16
1
56
3,8
56
5
,14
2
16
9,4
84
1
,91
1
74
0,3
93
1
00
%0
7
40
,39
3
Co
ntr
a C
ost
a2
6,4
84
7
,42
0
3,2
05
5
3,0
39
9
0,1
48
1
68
,64
6
25
8,7
94
1
51
,96
5
49
,49
7
53
,76
4
51
4,0
20
1
00
%0
5
14
,02
0
El D
ora
do
66
1
82
7
3,2
06
5
9,5
65
6
4,2
59
1
93
,88
3
25
8,1
42
3
2,2
69
2
39
,02
0
6,9
73
5
36
,40
4
47
%6
08
,51
9
1,1
44
,92
3
Fre
sno
68
5,4
11
4
15
,68
9
92
,64
9
17
6,5
24
1
,37
0,2
73
8
25
,75
2
2,1
96
,02
5
12
0,7
53
1
15
,72
2
4,9
14
2
,43
7,4
14
6
3%
1,4
08
,89
7
3,8
46
,31
1
Gle
nn
15
7,9
40
8
7,0
71
1
7,3
00
8
5,8
36
3
48
,14
7
22
6,8
37
5
74
,98
4
6,4
20
2
61
,77
5
5,9
50
8
49
,12
9
10
0%
0
84
9,1
28
Im
pe
ria
l1
94
,13
7
30
7,2
21
2
,14
1
35
,77
4
53
9,2
73
0
5
39
,27
3
28
,48
5
46
0,0
01
7
49
1
,02
8,5
08
3
6%
1,8
39
,91
8
2,8
68
,42
6
Ke
rn6
08
,78
9
21
3,4
65
9
1,8
30
0
9
14
,08
4
1,8
27
,39
1
2,7
41
,47
5
14
1,8
99
2
,33
0,9
98
9
,89
0
5,2
24
,26
2
10
0%
0
5,2
24
,26
2
Kin
gs
13
0,2
57
3
88
,89
1
21
,80
1
11
,13
8
55
2,0
87
2
71
,83
1
82
3,9
18
3
5,8
47
3
0,9
59
6
2
89
0,7
86
1
00
%0
8
90
,78
5
La
ke1
1,6
03
8
47
1
1,0
83
2
2,3
93
4
5,9
26
2
39
,87
3
28
5,7
99
1
5,6
88
5
02
,55
9
46
,79
3
85
0,8
39
1
00
%0
8
50
,84
1
Lo
s A
ng
ele
s3
0,8
76
9
52
1
,12
9
6,8
55
3
9,8
12
2
31
,47
5
27
1,2
87
1
74
,88
8
67
4,5
68
3
,31
8
1,1
24
,06
1
43
%1
,48
8,6
13
2
,61
2,6
74
M
ad
era
97
,09
5
84
,75
5
16
5,9
31
1
3,8
01
3
61
,58
2
40
0,6
04
7
62
,18
6
27
,21
4
65
,58
8
6,0
55
8
61
,04
3
63
%5
16
,49
2
1,3
77
,53
5
Ma
rin
0
23
3
28
7
63
,29
7
63
,81
7
89
,25
6
15
3,0
73
4
2,3
41
1
38
,42
9
44
,81
9
37
8,6
62
1
00
%0
3
78
,66
1
Ma
rip
osa
6
49
2
85
0
3
40
4
03
,60
2
40
3,9
42
2
,44
0
76
,01
5
6,0
47
4
88
,44
4
52
%4
47
,15
3
93
5,5
97
M
en
do
cin
o2
1,3
46
1
,37
4
7,3
70
0
3
0,0
90
1
,92
5,8
03
1
,95
5,8
93
1
9,4
55
6
7,3
61
2
,13
5
2,0
44
,84
4
91
%2
03
,24
9
2,2
48
,09
3
Me
rce
d2
71
,10
0
15
1,3
40
1
09
,03
0
65
,05
7
59
6,5
27
5
62
,46
1
1,1
58
,98
8
38
,37
6
51
,39
4
16
,85
9
1,2
65
,61
7
10
0%
0
1,2
65
,61
8
Mo
do
c
78
,06
5
43
,19
3
14
,55
6
15
0,1
83
2
85
,99
7
81
4,0
97
1
,10
0,0
94
3
,65
2
23
,22
6
57
,26
5
1,1
84
,23
7
44
%1
,50
5,4
44
2
,68
9,6
81
M
on
tere
y1
66
,25
1
43
,37
2
25
,52
4
0
23
5,1
47
1
,06
5,6
98
1
,30
0,8
45
5
6,7
79
7
57
,25
7
6,2
46
2
,12
1,1
27
1
00
%0
2
,12
1,1
27
N
ap
a3
1,6
21
9
,71
1
16
,41
4
18
,46
4
76
,21
0
17
9,0
29
2
55
,23
9
23
,55
7
20
4,6
71
2
2,3
96
5
05
,86
3
10
0%
0
50
5,8
59
N
eva
da
39
8
1,5
86
4
80
2
3,4
70
2
5,9
34
1
16
,80
8
14
2,7
42
1
7,5
41
1
28
,96
0
2,1
45
2
91
,38
8
47
%3
32
,44
8
62
3,8
36
O
ran
ge
3,2
43
3
67
3
,65
4
0
7,2
64
3
7,6
39
4
4,9
03
2
89
,17
2
17
4,6
67
9
72
5
09
,71
4
10
0%
0
50
9,7
12
P
lac
er
7,3
40
4
,06
8
18
,06
0
10
3,2
73
1
32
,74
1
24
,19
3
15
6,9
34
5
8,7
14
1
90
,80
3
5,0
11
4
11
,46
2
43
%5
48
,55
8
96
0,0
20
R
ive
rsid
e1
19
,63
5
44
,08
6
35
,39
1
22
9,8
77
4
28
,98
9
11
0,8
41
5
39
,83
0
32
1,5
53
1
,02
0,7
17
6
2,3
61
1
,94
4,4
61
4
2%
2,7
28
,44
0
4,6
72
,90
1
Sa
cra
me
nto
97
,47
6
45
,26
4
15
,07
6
53
,92
8
21
1,7
44
1
55
,82
2
36
7,5
66
1
78
,78
4
71
,58
4
18
,14
7
63
6,0
81
1
00
%0
6
36
,08
3
Sa
n B
en
ito
27
,42
5
6,4
75
2
,25
0
21
,31
0
57
,46
0
61
4,8
21
6
72
,28
1
8,0
23
2
07
,93
7
1,1
45
8
89
,38
6
10
0%
0
88
9,3
88
S
an
Be
rna
rdin
o1
2,8
48
6
,24
2
2,5
11
1
,16
0
22
,76
1
90
2,5
90
9
25
,35
1
27
7,8
75
2
45
,81
3
51
0
1,4
49
,54
9
11
%1
1,4
18
,24
0
12
,86
7,7
89
S
an
Die
go
7,0
85
9
,43
9
48
,35
9
15
4,0
38
2
18
,92
1
12
6,4
96
3
45
,41
7
35
5,1
46
1
,45
2,8
33
1
3,2
98
2
,16
6,6
94
8
0%
54
5,5
06
2
,71
2,2
00
S
an
Jo
aq
uin
38
5,3
37
8
3,3
07
6
9,4
81
7
6,8
69
6
14
,99
4
13
9,2
35
7
54
,22
9
91
,92
9
54
,66
2
11
,77
3
91
2,5
93
1
00
%0
9
12
,60
0
Sa
n L
uis
Ob
isp
o4
1,3
19
2
1,1
32
3
9,9
50
3
07
,32
5
40
9,7
26
1
,18
1,0
15
1
,59
0,7
41
4
5,0
17
2
42
,99
8
8,7
80
1
,88
7,5
36
8
9%
23
6,6
71
2
,12
4,2
07
S
an
Ma
teo
2,1
80
1
46
2
,27
1
69
5
5,2
92
4
8,7
97
5
4,0
89
7
2,5
10
1
61
,11
9
65
,73
4
35
3,4
52
1
00
%0
3
53
,45
0
Sa
nta
Ba
rba
ra6
6,5
68
1
2,4
75
3
5,6
06
1
0,6
43
1
25
,29
2
58
1,6
42
7
06
,93
4
62
,76
2
26
5,9
11
3
,72
3
1,0
39
,33
0
59
%7
18
,86
9
1,7
58
,19
9
Sa
nta
Cla
ra1
7,2
70
3
,63
0
2,5
23
4
,32
8
27
,75
1
39
2,7
77
4
20
,52
8
18
9,1
29
2
17
,10
8
8,4
58
8
35
,22
3
10
0%
0
83
5,2
25
S
an
ta C
ruz
13
,81
7
2,4
49
3
,76
3
54
8
20
,57
7
18
,26
8
38
,84
5
32
,75
0
21
3,7
61
3
57
2
85
,71
3
10
0%
0
28
5,7
09
S
ha
sta
11
,08
2
2,9
28
4
99
5
,20
7
19
,71
6
41
4,0
52
4
33
,76
8
36
,93
0
54
4,6
32
5
,87
8
1,0
21
,20
8
41
%1
,44
3,9
65
2
,46
5,1
73
S
ierr
a V
alle
y (3
)6
,59
9
6,2
44
3
,16
9
92
,96
4
10
8,9
76
7
9,5
76
1
88
,55
2
1,0
09
8
,16
4
45
1
97
,77
0
4%
5,1
11
,59
6
5,3
09
,36
6
Sis
kiyo
u
74
,24
5
26
,72
9
33
,58
4
62
4,5
22
7
59
,08
0
38
7,8
86
1
,14
6,9
66
1
5,7
74
1
00
,15
3
18
,39
9
1,2
81
,29
2
32
%2
,78
0,9
33
4
,06
2,2
25
S
ola
no
13
1,8
20
6
,36
9
9,2
75
0
1
47
,46
4
20
9,1
95
3
56
,65
9
59
,59
1
11
2,6
61
5
3,4
62
5
82
,37
3
10
0%
0
58
2,3
71
S
on
om
a2
9,9
39
1
7,1
92
3
2,9
24
8
0,1
95
1
60
,25
0
41
7,7
73
5
78
,02
3
75
,21
4
35
5,3
14
1
7,5
33
1
,02
6,0
84
1
00
%0
1
,02
6,0
85
S
tan
isla
us
25
3,4
35
3
1,4
74
8
7,5
27
3
1,3
66
4
03
,80
2
42
9,5
44
8
33
,34
6
64
,52
9
64
,83
1
7,4
65
9
70
,17
1
10
0%
0
97
0,1
69
S
utt
er
16
2,6
73
1
05
,39
5
17
,75
2
0
28
5,8
20
5
3,5
38
3
39
,35
8
13
,56
0
34
,51
3
1,8
83
3
89
,31
4
10
0%
0
38
9,3
13
T
eh
am
a6
2,1
75
1
7,3
04
1
9,5
65
1
32
,54
8
23
1,5
92
1
,54
7,9
51
1
,77
9,5
43
1
3,8
05
3
9,9
64
6
,18
2
1,8
39
,49
4
97
%5
3,4
06
1
,89
2,9
00
T
ula
re3
70
,24
9
32
3,5
99
1
1,5
93
1
54
,55
0
85
9,9
91
4
40
,04
2
1,3
00
,03
3
59
,94
4
22
1,2
36
4
,65
6
1,5
85
,86
9
51
%1
,51
3,4
07
3
,09
9,2
76
V
en
tura
42
,42
0
33
,48
2
28
,79
3
14
,98
8
11
9,6
83
1
97
,27
8
31
6,9
61
1
05
,23
3
12
9,8
16
3
,93
9
55
5,9
49
4
7%
63
1,9
02
1
,18
7,8
51
Y
olo
2
52
,08
3
16
,41
2
43
,62
9
62
,41
0
37
4,5
34
1
60
,45
0
53
4,9
84
3
0,5
37
8
0,1
28
7
,80
4
65
3,4
53
1
00
%0
6
53
,45
2
Yu
ba
39
,48
5
10
,82
9
32
,22
4
0
82
,53
8
14
1,5
09
2
24
,04
7
14
,02
6
16
7,3
13
6
,62
9
41
2,0
15
1
00
%0
4
12
,01
4
TO
TA
L (
4)
5,1
46
,56
2
2,6
21
,60
1
1,3
31
,87
4
3,1
86
,01
7
12
,28
6,0
54
1
9,2
00
,60
2
31
,48
6,6
56
3
,61
8,6
99
1
3,2
52
,33
8
71
4,4
96
4
9,0
72
,18
9
36
,16
9,6
78
8
5,2
41
,86
4
(1)
Co
un
tie
s th
at
are
no
t c
om
ple
tely
inve
nto
rie
d t
ypic
ally
co
nta
in la
rge
pu
blic
lan
d h
old
ing
s, s
uc
h a
s N
ati
on
al F
ore
sts,
th
at
are
no
t c
ove
red
by
mo
de
rn s
oil
surv
eys
.
(3)
La
sse
n, P
lum
as,
an
d S
ierr
a c
ou
nti
es
are
inc
lud
ed
wit
hin
th
e t
ri-c
ou
nty
are
a r
efe
rre
d t
o a
s "S
ierr
a V
alle
y" in
th
e U
SD
A-N
RC
S s
oil
surv
ey
for
tha
t re
gio
n.
(4)
Ca
teg
ory
an
d A
rea
Inve
nto
rie
d t
ota
ls m
ay
dif
fer
slig
htl
y fr
om
sta
tew
ide
co
nve
rsio
n t
ab
le d
ue
to
ro
un
din
g.
Sim
ilarl
y, m
ino
r d
isc
rep
an
cie
s o
cc
ur
be
twe
en
th
e F
MM
P in
ven
tori
ed
are
a a
nd
th
e s
tate
wid
e G
IS d
ata
se
t a
cre
ag
e d
ue
to
ro
un
din
g.
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
AC
RE
AG
E S
UM
MA
RY
20
10
IMP
OR
TA
NT
FA
RM
LA
ND
AC
RE
AG
E S
UM
MA
RY
20
10
(2)
To
tal C
ou
nty
Are
a f
igu
res
are
ca
lcu
late
d f
rom
a s
tate
wid
e G
IS c
ou
nty
bo
un
da
ry f
ile a
vaila
ble
th
rou
gh
th
e C
alif
orn
ia S
pa
tia
l In
form
ati
on
Lib
rary
.
Page 78
URBAN & TOTALCOUNTY GRAZING FARMLAND BUILT-UP OTHER COUNTY AREA COUNTY
PRIME STATEWIDE UNIQUE LOCAL LAND SUBTOTAL LAND LAND WATER MAPPED (1) AREA (1)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAImperial 194,137 307,221 2,141 35,774 0 539,273 28,485 460,001 749 1,028,508 2,868,426 Los Angeles 30,876 952 1,129 6,855 231,475 271,287 174,888 674,568 3,318 1,124,061 2,612,674 Orange 3,243 367 3,654 0 37,639 44,903 289,172 174,667 972 509,714 509,712 Riverside 119,635 44,086 35,391 229,877 110,841 539,830 321,553 1,020,717 62,361 1,944,461 4,672,901 San Bernardino 12,848 6,242 2,511 1,160 902,590 925,351 277,875 245,813 510 1,449,549 12,867,789 San Diego 7,085 9,439 48,359 154,038 126,496 345,417 355,146 1,452,833 13,298 2,166,694 2,712,200 Ventura 42,420 33,482 28,793 14,988 197,278 316,961 105,233 129,816 3,939 555,949 1,187,851 Subtotals 410,244 401,789 121,978 442,692 1,606,319 2,983,022 1,552,352 4,158,415 85,147 8,778,936 27,431,553 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYFresno 685,411 415,689 92,649 176,524 825,752 2,196,025 120,753 115,722 4,914 2,437,414 3,846,311 Kern 608,789 213,465 91,830 0 1,827,391 2,741,475 141,899 2,330,998 9,890 5,224,262 5,224,262 Kings 130,257 388,891 21,801 11,138 271,831 823,918 35,847 30,959 62 890,786 890,785 Madera 97,095 84,755 165,931 13,801 400,604 762,186 27,214 65,588 6,055 861,043 1,377,535 Merced 271,100 151,340 109,030 65,057 562,461 1,158,988 38,376 51,394 16,859 1,265,617 1,265,618 San Joaquin 385,337 83,307 69,481 76,869 139,235 754,229 91,929 54,662 11,773 912,593 912,600 Stanislaus 253,435 31,474 87,527 31,366 429,544 833,346 64,529 64,831 7,465 970,171 970,169 Tulare 370,249 323,599 11,593 154,550 440,042 1,300,033 59,944 221,236 4,656 1,585,869 3,099,276 Subtotals 2,801,673 1,692,520 649,842 529,305 4,896,860 10,570,200 580,491 2,935,390 61,674 14,147,755 17,586,556 CENTRAL COASTMonterey 166,251 43,372 25,524 0 1,065,698 1,300,845 56,779 757,257 6,246 2,121,127 2,121,127 San Benito 27,425 6,475 2,250 21,310 614,821 672,281 8,023 207,937 1,145 889,386 889,388 San Luis Obispo 41,319 21,132 39,950 307,325 1,181,015 1,590,741 45,017 242,998 8,780 1,887,536 2,124,207 Santa Barbara 66,568 12,475 35,606 10,643 581,642 706,934 62,762 265,911 3,723 1,039,330 1,758,199 Subtotals 301,563 83,454 103,330 339,278 3,443,176 4,270,801 172,581 1,474,103 19,894 5,937,379 6,892,921 SAN FRANCISCO BAYAlameda 3,953 1,230 2,383 0 244,033 251,599 146,263 73,595 53,880 525,337 525,338 Contra Costa 26,484 7,420 3,205 53,039 168,646 258,794 151,965 49,497 53,764 514,020 514,020 Marin 0 233 287 63,297 89,256 153,073 42,341 138,429 44,819 378,662 378,661 Napa 31,621 9,711 16,414 18,464 179,029 255,239 23,557 204,671 22,396 505,863 505,859 San Mateo 2,180 146 2,271 695 48,797 54,089 72,510 161,119 65,734 353,452 353,450 Santa Clara 17,270 3,630 2,523 4,328 392,777 420,528 189,129 217,108 8,458 835,223 835,225 Santa Cruz 13,817 2,449 3,763 548 18,268 38,845 32,750 213,761 357 285,713 285,709 Solano 131,820 6,369 9,275 0 209,195 356,659 59,591 112,661 53,462 582,373 582,371 Sonoma 29,939 17,192 32,924 80,195 417,773 578,023 75,214 355,314 17,533 1,026,084 1,026,085 Subtotals 257,084 48,380 73,045 220,566 1,767,774 2,366,849 793,320 1,526,155 320,403 5,006,727 5,006,718 SIERRA FOOTHILLAmador 3,211 1,421 3,335 1,864 188,433 198,264 8,295 88,491 5,323 300,373 387,825 El Dorado 661 827 3,206 59,565 193,883 258,142 32,269 239,020 6,973 536,404 1,144,923 Mariposa 6 49 285 0 403,602 403,942 2,440 76,015 6,047 488,444 935,597 Nevada 398 1,586 480 23,470 116,808 142,742 17,541 128,960 2,145 291,388 623,836 Placer 7,340 4,068 18,060 103,273 24,193 156,934 58,714 190,803 5,011 411,462 960,020 Subtotals 11,616 7,951 25,366 188,172 926,919 1,160,024 119,259 723,289 25,499 2,028,071 4,052,201 SACRAMENTO VALLEYButte 193,290 21,871 22,190 0 402,999 640,350 45,914 364,130 22,858 1,073,252 1,073,253 Colusa 196,320 2,046 120,316 236,013 9,161 563,856 5,142 169,484 1,911 740,393 740,393 Glenn 157,940 87,071 17,300 85,836 226,837 574,984 6,420 261,775 5,950 849,129 849,128 Sacramento 97,476 45,264 15,076 53,928 155,822 367,566 178,784 71,584 18,147 636,081 636,083 Shasta 11,082 2,928 499 5,207 414,052 433,768 36,930 544,632 5,878 1,021,208 2,465,173 Sutter 162,673 105,395 17,752 0 53,538 339,358 13,560 34,513 1,883 389,314 389,313 Tehama 62,175 17,304 19,565 132,548 1,547,951 1,779,543 13,805 39,964 6,182 1,839,494 1,892,900 Yolo 252,083 16,412 43,629 62,410 160,450 534,984 30,537 80,128 7,804 653,453 653,452 Yuba 39,485 10,829 32,224 0 141,509 224,047 14,026 167,313 6,629 412,015 412,014 Subtotals 1,172,524 309,120 288,551 575,942 3,112,319 5,458,456 345,118 1,733,523 77,242 7,614,339 9,111,709 NORTH STATE (northwest & northeast)Lake 11,603 847 11,083 22,393 239,873 285,799 15,688 502,559 46,793 850,839 850,841 Mendocino 21,346 1,374 7,370 0 1,925,803 1,955,893 19,455 67,361 2,135 2,044,844 2,248,093 Modoc 78,065 43,193 14,556 150,183 814,097 1,100,094 3,652 23,226 57,265 1,184,237 2,689,681 Sierra Valley (3) 6,599 6,244 3,169 92,964 79,576 188,552 1,009 8,164 45 197,770 5,309,366 Siskiyou 74,245 26,729 33,584 624,522 387,886 1,146,966 15,774 100,153 18,399 1,281,292 4,062,225 Subtotals 191,858 78,387 69,762 890,062 3,447,235 4,677,304 55,578 701,463 124,637 5,558,982 15,160,206 GRAND TOTALS (2) 5,146,562 2,621,601 1,331,874 3,186,017 19,200,602 31,486,656 3,618,699 13,252,338 714,496 49,072,189 85,241,864
(2) Category and Area Inventoried totals may differ slightly from statewide conversion table due to rounding. (3) Lassen, Plumas, and Sierra counties are included within the tri-county area referred to as "Sierra Valley" in the USDA-NRCS soil survey for that region.
(1) Total County Area figures are calculated from a statewide GIS county boundary file available through the California Spatial Information Library.
TABLE B-3
IMPORTANT FARMLAND ACREAGE SUMMARY, BY REGION, 2010
IRRIGATED FARMLAND NONIRRIGATED
Page 79
Page 80
Appendix C
County and Regional Conversion Summaries
LAND COMMITTED TO NONAGRICULTURAL USE
Shifts to Urban and Built-Up Land from (1): Land Committed toCOUNTY Statewide Other Land Grazing Nonagricultural Use (2)
Prime & Unique & Water & Local Total Prime Total
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAImperial 71 209 83 413 776 0 0 Los Angeles 19 -20 3,637 388 4,024 44 9,748 Orange 116 89 872 172 1,249 1,468 6,366 Riverside 943 235 1,978 2,718 5,874 375 34,258 San Bernardino 272 59 876 973 2,180 290 14,383 San Diego 68 166 2,969 1,443 4,646 89 7,490 Ventura 187 80 497 189 953 284 6,368 Subtotals 1,676 818 10,912 6,296 19,702 2,550 78,613 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYFresno 743 503 958 982 3,186 1,520 5,695 Kern 1,438 223 887 655 3,203 1,945 3,288 Kings 347 657 2,128 495 3,627 25 27 Madera 51 45 76 32 204 106 4,819 Merced 138 111 345 363 957 31 694 San Joaquin 516 308 427 149 1,400 404 4,293 Stanislaus 323 5 188 42 558 130 1,107 Tulare 1,438 196 51 312 1,997 159 747 Subtotals 4,994 2,048 5,060 3,030 15,132 4,320 20,670 CENTRAL COAST Monterey 168 1 66 10 245 635 1,109 San Benito 23 -9 88 19 121 0 0 San Luis Obispo 16 25 212 372 625 0 405 Santa Barbara 129 8 224 67 428 244 890 Subtotals 336 25 590 468 1,419 879 2,404 SAN FRANCISCO BAYAlameda 18 6 -112 276 188 104 4,478 Contra Costa 83 27 152 367 629 465 2,812 Marin 7 2 125 26 160 0 17 Napa -15 9 49 186 229 46 1,705 San Mateo 0 -3 633 8 638 0 556 Santa Clara 45 6 81 115 247 589 2,921 Santa Cruz 46 20 640 31 737 0 25 Solano 125 30 89 190 434 2 4,334 Sonoma 15 5 174 279 473 0 1,570 Subtotals 324 102 1,831 1,478 3,735 1,206 18,418 SIERRA FOOTHILLAmador 4 0 138 -42 100 0 0 El Dorado 1 4 37 33 75 0 0 Mariposa 0 0 16 1 17 0 1,493 Nevada 0 0 34 1 35 0 703 Placer (3) 0 -98 -208 398 92 0 1,850 Subtotals 5 -94 17 391 319 0 4,046 SACRAMENTO VALLEYButte 136 44 290 94 564 0 461 Colusa -3 4 13 17 31 0 0 Glenn -32 7 59 14 48 686 2,684 Sacramento 71 153 222 423 869 0 1,372 Shasta 19 -7 257 21 290 0 3,072 Sutter 53 69 178 30 330 0 181 Tehama 12 25 44 91 172 91 3,507 Yolo 135 9 143 25 312 232 1,244 Yuba 18 53 177 109 357 0 0 Subtotals 409 357 1,383 824 2,973 1,009 12,521 NORTH STATE (northwest & northeast)Lake 43 24 239 256 562 0 0 Mendocino 15 21 42 183 261 0 0 Modoc -2 1 18 205 222 16 4,847 Sierra Valley 4 0 0 6 10 0 2,919 Siskiyou 3 -5 61 110 169 0 49 Subtotals 63 41 360 760 1,224 16 7,815 GRAND TOTALS 7,807 3,297 20,153 13,247 44,504 9,980 144,487 (1) New Urban Land acreages are net figures. (2) Land Committed to Nonagricultural Use data is voluntarily submitted by city and county planning departments. (3) Conversion out of Urban and Built-up Land due to cropping in former water retention basins and insufficient infrastructure to qualify as Urban.
Table C-1
SOURCES OF URBAN LAND 2008-2010and
Page 81
Land converted to Irrigated Agriculture: Land removed from Irrigated Agriculture:Grazing, Local, Grazing, Local, Prime, Statewide Prime, Statewide
Other Land & Urban Other Land & Urban & Unique & Unique toto Prime to Statewide & Unique Total to Other Local & Grazing Total
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAImperial 411 755 1,166 915 5,296 6,211 Los Angeles 890 46 936 185 2,555 2,740 Orange 15 92 107 506 536 1,042 Riverside 2,346 1,805 4,151 1,210 7,341 8,551 San Bernardino 408 132 540 206 1,877 2,083 San Diego 132 615 747 2,020 3,745 5,765 Ventura 379 1,193 1,572 793 2,005 2,798 Subtotals 4,581 4,638 9,219 5,835 23,355 29,190 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYFresno 3,250 1,925 5,175 2,085 34,333 36,418 Kern 2,152 1,433 3,585 2,973 24,084 27,057 Kings 491 3,627 4,118 516 19,675 20,191 Madera 1,342 4,040 5,382 749 3,338 4,087 Merced 2,529 8,476 11,005 1,963 2,722 4,685 San Joaquin 886 4,653 5,539 2,360 14,075 16,435 Stanislaus 1,065 8,675 9,740 1,304 4,587 5,891 Tulare 1,190 3,182 4,372 2,751 8,769 11,520 Subtotals 12,905 36,011 48,916 14,701 111,583 126,284 CENTRAL COAST Monterey 806 2,379 3,185 501 2,024 2,525 San Benito 820 761 1,581 361 2,727 3,088 San Luis Obispo 867 2,707 3,574 236 2,323 2,559 Santa Barbara 694 2,392 3,086 457 2,056 2,513 Subtotals 3,187 8,239 11,426 1,555 9,130 10,685 SAN FRANCISCO BAYAlameda 87 100 187 84 163 247 Contra Costa 778 326 1,104 288 1,029 1,317 Marin 0 50 50 191 97 288 Napa 240 619 859 290 646 936 San Mateo 65 226 291 43 194 237 Santa Clara 86 103 189 355 1,657 2,012 Santa Cruz 41 65 106 789 526 1,315 Solano 578 487 1,065 689 6,025 6,714 Sonoma 395 1,912 2,307 407 1,972 2,379 Subtotals 2,270 3,888 6,158 3,136 12,309 15,445 SIERRA FOOTHILLAmador 3 17 20 117 724 841 El Dorado 3 79 82 70 770 840 Mariposa 0 18 18 0 9 9 Nevada 0 3 3 31 807 838 Placer 47 312 359 295 3,508 3,803 Subtotals 53 429 482 513 5,818 6,331 SACRAMENTO VALLEYButte 520 450 970 2,018 1,944 3,962 Colusa 359 611 970 1,224 1,753 2,977 Glenn 1,687 1,731 3,418 1,058 4,613 5,671 Sacramento 385 621 1,006 594 11,671 12,265 Shasta 245 76 321 503 1,372 1,875 Sutter 620 822 1,442 4,265 2,287 6,552 Tehama 1,106 2,306 3,412 343 2,297 2,640 Yolo 540 1,033 1,573 870 6,153 7,023 Yuba 294 656 950 1,615 1,671 3,286 Subtotals 5,756 8,306 14,062 12,490 33,761 46,251 NORTH STATE (northwest & northeast)Lake 139 294 433 582 2,755 3,337 Mendocino 409 277 686 119 125 244 Modoc 1,266 1,512 2,778 202 4,523 4,725 Sierra Valley 73 342 415 30 4,360 4,390 Siskiyou 523 1,736 2,259 45 5,546 5,591 Subtotals 2,410 4,161 6,571 978 17,309 18,287 GRAND TOTALS 31,162 65,672 96,834 39,208 213,265 252,473
(1) Agricultural change data compiled from Part III of individual county tables. Figures do not include shifts among irrigated categories (soil unit revisions); shifts involving Water are grouped with Other Land.
Table C-2
IRRIGATED FARMLAND CHANGES 2008-2010 (1)ASIDE FROM URBANIZATION
COUNTY
Page 82
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Merced 5,964Imperial -5,333 Stanislaus 3,455Los Angeles -1,854 Madera 1,181Orange -1,158 San Luis Obispo 946Riverside -5,609 Tehama 721San Bernardino -1,897 Monterey 476San Diego -5,258 Santa Barbara 402Ventura -1,580 Mendocino 399 Subtotal -22,689 San Mateo 52SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY Mariposa 9Fresno -32,622 Sonoma -117Kern -25,137 Napa -120Kings -17,133 Alameda -123Madera 1,181 Marin -247Merced 5,964 Contra Costa -360San Joaquin -11,777 El Dorado -764Stanislaus 3,455 Amador -825Tulare -8,801 Nevada -835 Subtotal -84,870 Orange -1,158CENTRAL COAST Santa Cruz -1,283Monterey 476 San Benito -1,537San Benito -1,537 Shasta -1,576San Luis Obispo 946 Ventura -1,580Santa Barbara 402 Los Angeles -1,854 Subtotal 287 San Bernardino -1,897SAN FRANCISCO BAY Santa Clara -1,898Al d 123 M d 1 949
Table C-3
NET CHANGE IN IRRIGATED LAND2008-2010
From all Factors (1)
2008-2010Rank by CountyGrouped by Region
Alameda -123 Modoc -1,949Contra Costa -360 Colusa -2,013Marin -247 Glenn -2,303Napa -120 Yuba -2,414San Mateo 52 Lake -2,974Santa Clara -1,898 Butte -3,210Santa Cruz -1,283 Siskiyou -3,336Solano -5,835 Placer -3,444Sonoma -117 Sierra Valley -3,979 Subtotal -9,931 Sutter -5,248SIERRA FOOTHILL San Diego -5,258Amador -825 Imperial -5,333El Dorado -764 Riverside -5,609Mariposa 9 Yolo -5,612Nevada -835 Solano -5,835Placer -3,444 Tulare -8,801 Subtotal -5,859 Sacramento -11,483SACRAMENTO VALLEY San Joaquin -11,777Butte -3,210 Kings -17,133Colusa -2,013 Kern -25,137Glenn -2,303 Fresno -32,622Sacramento -11,483Shasta -1,576Sutter -5,248Tehama 721Yolo -5,612Yuba -2,414 Subtotal -33,138NORTH STATE (northwest & northeast)Lake -2,974Mendocino 399Modoc -1,949Sierra Valley -3,979Siskiyou -3,336 Subtotal -11,839
(1) Data compiled from Part I of individual county tables. Net change includes the impact of urbanization, conversion to Other Land, removal from irrigated use due to idling, as well as conversions into irrigated use. The net figure also includes any soil unit reclassifications or other revisions within irrigated categories.
,GRAND TOTAL -168,039
Page 83
Page 84
Appendix D
Rural Land Use Mapping Tables
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential 180,627 185,742 5,115 2.8%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 39,598 40,958 1,360 3.4%Confined Animal Agriculture 88,669 90,620 1,951 2.2%Vacant or Disturbed Land 347,498 350,004 2,506 0.7%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 2,387,127 2,388,250 1,123 0.0%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 3,043,519 3,055,574 12,055 0.4%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORYRural
Residential Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 2,126 1,003 877 4,917 642Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 989 496 1,576 1,203 927Unique Farmland to: 444 165 548 694 242IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 3,559 1,664 3,001 6,814 1,811Farmland of Local Importance to: 1,356 348 172 728 1,931Grazing Land to: 2,154 462 291 749 984AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 7,069 2,474 3,464 8,291 4,726Urban and Built-up Land (3) to: 114 145 21 206 84Other Rural Land Uses (4) to: 836 577 186 1,120 325TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 8,019 3,196 3,671 9,617 5,135
PART III
Farmland of
TABLE D-1
RURAL LAND USE CONVERSION SUMMARY2008-2010, FOR ALL AVAILABLE COUNTIES
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGED (2)PERCENT CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and Built-
up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses (4)
Rural Residential Land to: 1,115 946 450 393Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 382 672 187 595Confined Animal Agriculture to: 70 945 322 383Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 3,829 2,156 465 661Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 323 2,099 578 1,012TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 5,719 6,818 2,002 3,044(1) As of 2010, rural Land data is available in the counties of Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mendocino, Merced, San Joaquin,
(2) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land categories is equal to that of Other Land plus the acreage of Confined Animal Agriculture. In some counties, Confined Animal Agriculture facilities are included within the county's Farmland of Local Importance definition--see Appendix E for defintions.
(4) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
RURAL LAND USE CONVERSION SUMMARY
Stanislaus, and Tulare. These counties encompass 33 percent of the Important Farmland survey area.
(3) Conversions out of Urban Land primarily due to the use of detailed digital imagery to delineate more distinct urban boundaries.
Page 85
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEYFresno (3) 519 1,366 1,885 445 66 852 1,785 3,148Kern 137 154 291 240 -3 2,542 -581 2,198Kings 148 10 158 176 1,140 66 31 1,413Madera 23 19 42 68 20 -118 -82 -112Merced 8 207 215 17 259 273 519 1,068San Joaquin 794 450 1,244 267 -151 911 406 1,433Stanislaus 253 68 321 235 101 206 -301 241Tulare 654 290 944 103 755 905 357 2,120 Subtotals 2,536 2,564 5,100 1,551 2,187 5,637 2,134 11,509ADDITIONAL RURAL LAND COUNTIESMendocino 77 496 573 64 10 33 -85 22 Subtotals 77 496 573 64 10 33 -85 22GRAND TOTALS 2,613 3,060 5,673 1,615 2,197 5,670 2,049 11,531(1) As of 2010, Rural Land data is available in the counties of Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mendocino, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Tulare. These counties encompass 33 percent of the Important Farmland survey area.(2) Negative numbers represent net increase of farm or grazing land relative to the Rural Land category.(3) Conversion to Nonagricultural Vegetation is primarily due to the Don Gragnani Wetland Reserve Project on the USGS San Joaquin quad.
Total
Table D-2
RURAL LAND MAPPING CHANGES 2008-2010 NET ACRES - FOR ALL AVAILABLE COUNTIES (1)
COUNTY
Farm and Grazing Land converted to Rural Residential: (2)
Farm and Grazing Land converted to other Rural Land categories: (2)
To Nonagricultural or Natural Vegetation
To Vacant or Disturbed
To Confined Animal
Agriculture
To Semi-agricultural and
Rural Commercial
Irrigated Farmland
Grazing and Local
Total
Page 86
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 40,905 42,468 1,563 3.8%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 6,721 7,283 562 8.4%Confined Animal Agriculture 12,401 12,473 72 0.6%Vacant or Disturbed Land 30,611 30,836 225 0.7%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 33,465 35,135 1,670 5.0%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 124,103 128,195 4,092 3.3%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 457 349 70 352 46Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 175 72 123 335 96Unique Farmland to: 90 28 34 60 25IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 722 449 227 747 167Farmland of Local Importance (2) to: 430 150 29 439 1,776Grazing Land (3) to: 1,045 85 0 12 3AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 2,197 684 256 1,198 1,946Urban and Built-up Land to: 19 117 18 35 12Other Rural Land Uses (4) to: 94 81 9 108 2TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 2,310 882 283 1,341 1,960
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(4)Rural Residential Land to: 362 203 109 73Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 55 208 31 26Confined Animal Agriculture to: 1 135 55 20Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 721 278 68 49Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 3 133 28 126TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 1,142 957 291 294(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land categories in Fresno County is equal to that of Other Land plus that of Confined Animal Agriculture. Confined animal agriculture facilities are a component of the county's Farmland of Local Importance definition.(2) Conversion to Nonagricultural Vegetation primarily due to development of the Don Gragnani Wetland Reserve Project. (3) Conversion to Rural Residential Land due to low development home development throughout the county.
FRESNO COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(4) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
TABLE D-3
FRESNO COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Page 87
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010
Rural Residential Land 38,410 38,703 293 0.8%
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 11,633 11,629 -4 0.0%
Confined Animal Agriculture 7,553 7,549 -4 -0.1%
Vacant or Disturbed Land 244,661 247,072 2,411 1.0%
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 2,027,139 2,026,045 -1,094 -0.1%
TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 2,329,396 2,330,998 1,602 0.1%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORYRural
Residential
Land
Semi-
agricultural
and Rural
Commerical
Confined
Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or
Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural
and Natural
Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 125 103 0 2,184 19
Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 21 151 0 160 24
Unique Farmland to: 2 20 0 55 108
IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 148 274 0 2,399 151
Farmland of Local Importance to: 0 0 0 0 0
Grazing Land to: 176 70 0 520 348
AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 324 344 0 2,919 499
Urban and Built-up Land to: 45 3 0 122 55
Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 340 166 0 528 83
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 709 513 0 3,569 637
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORY
Urban and
Built-up Land
Irrigated
Farmland
Farmland of
Local
Importance
and Grazing
Other Rural
Land Uses
(2)
Rural Residential Land to: 296 11 22 87
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 173 51 53 240
Confined Animal Agriculture to: 0 2 1 1
Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 501 218 159 280
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 142 996 84 509
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 1,112 1,278 319 1,117
(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Kern County.
(3) Conversion to Vacant and Disturbed Land due to land left idle for three or more update cycles that has been graded for
development primarily in the Bakersfield area, the expansion of oil extraction in the Lost Hills area, and the delineation of
KERN COUNTY
ACREAGE
CHANGED
PERCENT
CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
low density housing, farmsteads, and rural commercial.
TABLE D-4
KERN COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED
Page 88
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 3,861 3,930 69 1.8%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 2,551 2,726 175 6.9%Confined Animal Agriculture 10,022 11,138 1,116 11.1%Vacant or Disturbed Land 20,383 18,403 -1,980 -9.7%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 5,859 5,900 41 0.7%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 42,676 42,097 -579 -1.4%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 83 34 56 64 33Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 128 89 709 33 13Unique Farmland to: 9 19 240 5 6IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 220 142 1,005 102 52Farmland of Local Importance to: 0 0 0 0 0Grazing Land to: 13 69 216 99 0AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 233 211 1,221 201 52Urban and Built-up Land to: 0 0 0 0 0Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 29 39 51 59 80TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 262 250 1,272 260 132
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 42 72 3 76Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 23 35 0 17Confined Animal Agriculture to: 22 80 1 53Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 2,015 117 18 90Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 48 18 3 22TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 2,150 322 25 258(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land categories in Kings County is equal to that of Other Land plus the acreage of Confined Animal Agriculture.
Confined animal agriculture facilities are a component of the county's Farmland of Local Importance definition.
KINGS COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
TABLE D-5
KINGS COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Page 89
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010
Rural Residential Land 28,381 28,426 45 0.2%
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 1,820 1,887 67 3.7%
Confined Animal Agriculture 4,071 4,108 37 0.9%
Vacant or Disturbed Land 10,472 10,280 -192 -1.8%
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 20,990 20,887 -103 -0.5%
TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 65,734 65,588 -146 -0.2%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORYRural
Residential
Land
Semi-
agricultural
and Rural
Commerical
Confined
Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or
Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural
and Natural
Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 68 42 37 132 24
Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 13 1 16 48 9
Unique Farmland to: 47 27 27 243 15
IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 128 70 80 423 48
Farmland of Local Importance to: 16 0 1 5 0
Grazing Land to: 25 84 18 17 5
AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 169 154 99 445 53
Urban and Built-up Land to: 5 0 0 0 0
Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 36 0 17 6 0
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 210 154 116 451 53
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORY
Urban and
Built-up Land
Irrigated
Farmland
Farmland of
Local
Importance
and Grazing
Other Rural
Land Uses
(2)
Rural Residential Land to: 38 105 22 0
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 0 86 0 1
Confined Animal Agriculture to: 0 79 0 0
Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 41 522 41 39
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 2 135 0 19
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 81 927 63 59(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Madera County.
MADERA COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
TABLE D-6
MADERA COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGED
PERCENT
CHANGE
Page 90
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 19,985 20,501 516 2.6%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 1,049 1,117 68 6.5%Confined Animal Agriculture 70 80 10 14.3%Vacant or Disturbed Land 977 1,009 32 3.3%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 44,727 44,654 -73 -0.2%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 66,808 67,361 553 0.8%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 63 10 0 0 18Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 1 0 0 0 0Unique Farmland to: 26 0 0 0 1IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 90 10 0 0 19Farmland of Local Importance to: 0 0 0 0 0Grazing Land to: 632 64 10 33 17AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 722 74 10 33 36Urban and Built-up Land to: 1 0 0 0 2Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 4 4 0 0 35TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 727 78 10 33 73
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 27 13 136 35Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 0 7 3 0Confined Animal Agriculture to: 0 0 0 0Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 1 0 0 0Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 17 4 117 8TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 45 24 256 43(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Mendocino County.
MENDOCINO COUNTY
TABLE D-7
MENDOCINO COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
Page 91
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 5,310 5,418 108 2.0%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 3,605 3,666 61 1.7%Confined Animal Agriculture 14,188 14,339 151 1.1%Vacant or Disturbed Land 15,008 15,234 226 1.5%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 12,345 12,737 392 3.2%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 50,456 51,394 938 1.9%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 142 92 254 424 46Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 65 51 276 80 69Unique Farmland to: 7 21 185 213 38IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 214 164 715 717 153Farmland of Local Importance to: 168 8 44 79 51Grazing Land to: 86 8 22 4 422AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 468 180 781 800 626Urban and Built-up Land to: 0 1 3 0 2Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 39 81 38 166 11TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 507 262 822 966 639
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 102 206 47 44Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 14 161 2 24Confined Animal Agriculture to: 4 439 83 145Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 153 510 17 60Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 78 75 32 62TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 351 1,391 181 335(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Merced County.
MERCED COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
TABLE D-8
MERCED COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Page 92
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 19,985 20,501 516 2.6%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 1,049 1,117 68 6.5%Confined Animal Agriculture 70 80 10 14.3%Vacant or Disturbed Land 977 1,009 32 3.3%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 44,727 44,654 -73 -0.2%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 66,808 67,361 553 0.8%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 63 10 0 0 18Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 1 0 0 0 0Unique Farmland to: 26 0 0 0 1IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 90 10 0 0 19Farmland of Local Importance to: 0 0 0 0 0Grazing Land to: 632 64 10 33 17AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 722 74 10 33 36Urban and Built-up Land to: 1 0 0 0 2Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 4 4 0 0 35TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 727 78 10 33 73
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 27 13 136 35Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 0 7 3 0Confined Animal Agriculture to: 0 0 0 0Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 1 0 0 0Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 17 4 117 8TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 45 24 256 43(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Mendocino County.
MENDOCINO COUNTY
TABLE D-7
MENDOCINO COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
Page 91
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 5,310 5,418 108 2.0%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 3,605 3,666 61 1.7%Confined Animal Agriculture 14,188 14,339 151 1.1%Vacant or Disturbed Land 15,008 15,234 226 1.5%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 12,345 12,737 392 3.2%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 50,456 51,394 938 1.9%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 142 92 254 424 46Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 65 51 276 80 69Unique Farmland to: 7 21 185 213 38IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 214 164 715 717 153Farmland of Local Importance to: 168 8 44 79 51Grazing Land to: 86 8 22 4 422AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 468 180 781 800 626Urban and Built-up Land to: 0 1 3 0 2Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 39 81 38 166 11TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 507 262 822 966 639
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 102 206 47 44Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 14 161 2 24Confined Animal Agriculture to: 4 439 83 145Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 153 510 17 60Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 78 75 32 62TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 351 1,391 181 335(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Merced County.
MERCED COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
TABLE D-8
MERCED COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Page 92
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 14,583 15,767 1,184 8.1%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 4,048 4,161 113 2.8%Confined Animal Agriculture 5,552 5,247 -305 -5.5%Vacant or Disturbed Land 10,371 11,134 763 7.4%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 23,139 23,600 461 2.0%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 57,693 59,909 2,216 3.8%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 464 126 37 523 344Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 226 49 16 401 22Unique Farmland to: 127 36 23 41 1IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 817 211 76 965 367Farmland of Local Importance to: 411 125 18 95 42Grazing Land to: 79 23 5 26 14AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 1,307 359 99 1,086 423Urban and Built-up Land to: 18 0 0 14 4Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 144 84 28 18 68TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 1,469 443 127 1,118 495
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 202 23 40 20Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 98 32 60 140Confined Animal Agriculture to: 34 72 178 148Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 156 93 82 24Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 7 17 0 10TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 497 237 360 342(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land categories in San Joaquin County is equal to that of Other Land plus the acerage of Confined Animal Agriculture. Confined animal agriculture facilities are a component of the county's Farmland of Local Importance definition.(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
TABLE D-9
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Page 93
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATIONDivision of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010Rural Residential Land 9,516 9,819 303 3.2%Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 2,568 2,866 298 11.6%Confined Animal Agriculture 11,595 11,721 126 1.1%Vacant or Disturbed Land 5,477 5,540 63 1.2%Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 35,300 34,885 -415 -1.2%TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 64,456 64,831 375 0.6%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORY Rural Residential
Land
Semi-agricultural
and Rural Commerical
Confined Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 264 168 99 358 83Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 23 19 38 55 11Unique Farmland to: 75 12 39 36 24IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 362 199 176 449 118Farmland of Local Importance to: 50 30 24 26 1Grazing Land to: 35 59 11 32 119AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 447 288 211 507 238Urban and Built-up Land to: 26 3 0 0 6Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 17 87 37 97 34TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 490 378 248 604 278
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORYUrban and
Built-up LandIrrigated Farmland
Farmland of Local
Importance and Grazing
Other Rural Land Uses
(2)Rural Residential Land to: 32 109 17 29Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 3 45 8 24Confined Animal Agriculture to: 0 106 4 12Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 171 236 65 69Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 16 252 287 138TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 222 748 381 272(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories is equal to that of Other Land in the Important Farmland Map for Stanislaus County.
STANISLAUS COUNTY
TABLE D-10
STANISLAUS COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGEDPERCENT CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
Page 94
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION
Division of Land Resource Protection Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
PART I
2008 2010
Rural Residential Land 19,676 20,710 1,034 5.3%
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial 5,603 5,623 20 0.4%
Confined Animal Agriculture 23,217 23,965 748 3.2%
Vacant or Disturbed Land 9,538 10,496 958 10.0%
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation 184,163 184,407 244 0.1%
TOTAL AREA INVENTORIED (1) 242,197 245,201 3,004 1.2%
PART II
LAND USE CATEGORYRural
Residential
Land
Semi-
agricultural
and Rural
Commerical
Confined
Animal
Agriculture
Vacant or
Disturbed
Land
Nonagricultural
and Natural
Vegetation
Prime Farmland to: 460 79 324 880 29
Farmland of Statewide Importance to: 337 64 398 91 683
Unique Farmland to: 61 2 0 41 24
IRRIGATED FARMLAND SUBTOTAL to: 858 145 722 1,012 736
Farmland of Local Importance to: 281 35 56 84 61
Grazing Land to: 63 0 9 6 56
AGRICULTURAL LAND TOTAL to: 1,202 180 787 1,102 853
Urban and Built-up Land to: 0 21 0 35 3
Other Rural Land Uses (2) to: 133 35 6 138 12
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED TO RURAL USES 1,335 236 793 1,275 868
PART III
LAND USE CATEGORY
Urban and
Built-up Land
Irrigated
Farmland
Farmland of
Local
Importance
and Grazing
Other Rural
Land Uses
(2)
Rural Residential Land to: 14 204 54 29
Semi-agricultural and Rural Commercial to: 16 47 30 123
Confined Animal Agriculture to: 9 32 0 4
Vacant or Disturbed Land to: 70 182 15 50
Nonagricultural and Natural Vegetation to: 10 469 27 118
TOTAL LAND CONVERTED FROM RURAL USES 119 934 126 324(1) Total Area Inventoried for Rural Land Use categories in Tulare County is equal to that of Other Land plus that of Confined Animal
Agriculture. The confined animal agriculture facilities are a component of the county's Farmland of Local Importance definition.
TULARE COUNTY
TABLE D-11
TULARE COUNTY2008-2010 Rural Land Use Data
Rural Land Use Summary
LAND USE CATEGORYACREAGE INVENTORIED ACREAGE
CHANGED
PERCENT
CHANGE
Conversions to Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
Conversions From Rural Land Uses, 2008 to 2010
(2) These statistics represent shifts from one Rural Land Use category to another.
Page 95
Page 96
Appendix E
Farmland of Local Importance Definitions
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 97
Farmland of Local Importance
Background
Farmland of Local Importance is land of importance to the local economy, as defined by each county's local advisory committee and adopted by its Board of Supervisors. Farmland of Local Importance is either currently producing, or has the capability of production, but does not meet the criteria of Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Unique Farmland. Authority to adopt or to recommend changes to the category of Farmland of Local Importance rests with the Board of Supervisors in each county.
ALAMEDA The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Alameda County.
AMADOR Land that is currently in agricultural production and that is providing an economic return equal to that from the prime soil types.
BUTTE The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Butte County.
COLUSA The following lands are to be included in the Farmland of Local Importance category: All farmable lands within Colusa County that do not meet the definitions of Prime, Statewide, or Unique, but are currently irrigated pasture or nonirrigated crops; or nonirrigated land with soils qualifying for Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance; or lands that would have Prime or Statewide designation and have been improved for irrigation but are now idle; or lands with a General Plan Land Use designation for agricultural purposes; and lands that are legislated to be used only for agricultural (farmland) purposes.
CONTRA COSTA The lands within the Tassajara area, extending eastward to the county boundary and bordered on the north by the Black Hills, the Deer, Lone Tree and Briones Valleys, the Antioch area, and the Delta. These lands are typically used for livestock grazing. They are capable of producing dryland grain on a two year summer fallow or longer rotation with volunteer hay and pasture. The farmlands in this category are included in the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service's Land Capability Classes I, II, III, and IV, and lack some irrigation water.
EL DORADO Lands that do not qualify for the Prime, Statewide, or Unique designation but are considered Existing Agricultural Lands, or Potential Agricultural Lands, in the Agricultural Land Element of the County General Plan. Timberlands are excluded.
FRESNO All farmable lands within Fresno County that do not meet the definitions of Prime, Statewide, or Unique. This includes land that is or has been used for irrigated pasture, dryland farming, confined livestock and dairy, poultry facilities, aquaculture and grazing land.
GLENN Local Importance (L): All lands not qualifying for Prime, Statewide, or Unique that are cropped on a continuing
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 98
or cyclic basis (irrigation is not a consideration). All cropable land within Glenn County water district boundaries not qualifying for Prime, Statewide, or Unique.
Local Potential (LP): All lands having Prime and Statewide soil mapping units which are not irrigated, regardless of cropping history or irrigation water availability.
IMPERIAL Unirrigated and uncultivated lands with Prime and Statewide soils.
KERN The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Kern County.
KINGS Land that supports the following commercial agricultural activities: dairies, confined livestock, and poultry operations.
LAKE Lands which do not qualify as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance or Unique Farmland, but are currently irrigated pasture or nonirrigated crops; and unirrigated land with soils qualifying for Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Areas of unirrigated Prime and Statewide Importance soils overlying ground water basins may have more potential for agricultural use.
LOS ANGELES Producing lands that would meet the standard criteria for Prime or Statewide but are not irrigated.
MADERA Lands that are presently under cultivation for small grain crops, but are not irrigated. Also lands that are currently irrigated pasture, but have the potential to be cultivated for row/field crop use.
MARIN Land which is not irrigated, but is cultivated; or has the potential for cultivation.
MARIPOSA The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Mariposa County.
MENDOCINO The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Mendocino County.
MERCED Farmlands that have physical characteristics that would qualify for Prime or Statewide except for the lack of irrigation water. Also, farmlands that produce crops that are not listed under Unique but are important to the economy of the county or city.
MODOC Irrigated and dry cropland classified as Class III and Class IV irrigated land if water is or becomes available.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 99
MONTEREY The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Monterey County.
NAPA These farmlands include areas of soils that meet all the characteristics of Prime Farmland or of additional Farmland of Statewide Importance with the exception of irrigation. These farmlands include dryland grains, haylands, and dryland pasture.
NEVADA Farmlands that have physical characteristics that would qualify for Prime or Statewide except for the lack of irrigation water. Farmlands that produce crops that are not listed under Unique Lands but are important to the economy of the county are: Christmas trees, Sudan grass, Meadow hay, chestnuts, poultry houses and feedlots, improved dryland pasture (not rangeland), and irrigated pasture (it is under Statewide or Prime if soils are listed as such, otherwise as Local).
Also, lands that are legislated to be used only for agricultural (farmland) purposes, such as Williamson Act land in western Nevada County.
ORANGE The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Orange County.
PLACER Farmlands not covered by the categories of Prime, Statewide, or Unique. They include lands zoned for agriculture by County Ordinance and the California Land Conservation Act as well as dry farmed lands, irrigated pasture lands, and other agricultural lands of significant economic importance to the County and include lands that have a potential for irrigation from Placer County water supplies.
RIVERSIDE Soils that would be classified as Prime and Statewide but lack available irrigation water. Lands planted to dryland crops of barley, oats, and wheat.
Lands producing major crops for Riverside County but that are not listed as Unique crops. These crops are identified as returning one million or more dollars on the 1980 Riverside County Agriculture Crop Report. Crops identified are permanent pasture (irrigated), summer squash, okra, eggplant, radishes, and watermelons.
Dairylands, including corrals, pasture, milking facilities, hay and manure storage areas if accompanied with permanent pasture or hayland of 10 acres or more.
Lands identified by city or county ordinance as Agricultural Zones or Contracts, which includes Riverside City "Proposition R" lands. Lands planted to jojoba which are under cultivation and are of producing age.
SACRAMENTO Lands which do not qualify as Prime, Statewide, or Unique designation but are currently irrigated crops or pasture or nonirrigated crops; lands that would be Prime or Statewide designation and have been improved for irrigation but are now idle; and lands which currently support confined livestock, poultry operations, and aquaculture.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 100
SAN BENITO Land cultivated as dry cropland. Usual crops are wheat, barley, oats, safflower, and grain hay. Also, orchards affected by boron within the area specified in County Resolution Number 84-3.
SAN BERNARDINO Farmlands which include areas of soils that meet all the characteristics of Prime, Statewide, or Unique and which are not irrigated.
Farmlands not covered by above categories but are of high economic importance to the community. These farmlands include dryland grains of wheat, barley, oats, and dryland pasture.
SAN DIEGO Land that meets all the characteristics of Prime and Statewide, with the exception of irrigation.
Farmlands not covered by the above categories but are of significant economic importance to the county. They have a history of good production for locally adapted crops. The soils are grouped in types that are suited for truck crops (such as tomatoes, strawberries, cucumbers, potatoes, celery, squash, romaine lettuce, and cauliflower) and soils suited for orchard crops (avocados and citrus).
SAN JOAQUIN All farmable land within San Joaquin County not meeting the definitions of "Prime Farmland," "Farmland of Statewide Importance," and "Unique Farmland." This includes land that is or has been used for irrigated pasture, dryland farming, confined livestock or dairy facilities, aquaculture, poultry facilities, and dry grazing. It also includes soils previously designated by soil characteristics as "Prime Farmland," "Farmland of Statewide Importance," and "Unique Farmland" that has since become idle.
SAN LUIS OBISPO Local Importance (L): areas of soils that meet all the characteristics of Prime or Statewide, with the exception of irrigation. Additional farmlands include dryland field crops of wheat, barley, oats, and safflower.
Local Potential (LP): lands having the potential for farmland, which have Prime or Statewide characteristics and are not cultivated.
SAN MATEO Lands other than Prime, Statewide, or Unique that produce the following crops: oats, Christmas trees, pumpkins, dryland pasture, other grains, and haylands. These lands are not irrigated.
SANTA BARBARA All dryland farming areas and permanent pasture (if the soils were not eligible for either Prime or Statewide). Dryland farming includes various cereal grains (predominantly wheat, barley, and oats), sudan, and many varieties of beans. (Although beans can be high value crops the production areas are usually rotated with grain, hence the decision to include them under Local rather than Unique. Also, bean crop yields are highly influenced by climate, so there can be a wide variance in cash value.)
SANTA CLARA Small orchards and vineyards primarily in the foothill areas. Also land cultivated as dry cropland for grains and hay.
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 101
SANTA CRUZ Soils used for Christmas tree farms and nurseries, and that do not meet the definition for Prime, Statewide, or Unique.
SHASTA Dryland grain producing lands. Also included are farmlands that are presently irrigated but do not meet the soil characteristics of Prime or Statewide. The majority of these farmlands are located within the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District. These soils include Newton gravelly loam (8 to 15 percent slopes), Moda loam, seeped (0 to 3 percent slopes), Moda loam, shallow (0 to 5 percent slopes), and Hillgate loam.
SIERRA VALLEY Plumas County: Lands designated as "agricultural preserve" in the 1984 Plumas County General Plan and rangelands with a carrying capacity of 8 acres/animal month, as well as irrigable lands.
Lassen and Sierra counties: Farmlands that include areas of soils that meet all the characteristics of Prime or Statewide and which are not irrigated. Also, all dry land wheat, barley, oats, hayland, and pasture.
SISKIYOU Farmlands that include dryland or sub-irrigated hay and grain and improved pasture forage species; these dry farmed lands commonly have inclusions of uncultivated shallow, rocky, or steep soils; farmlands presently irrigated but which do not meet the soil characteristics of Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance; areas currently shown as Prime Agricultural Land in the Siskiyou County General Plan; areas under contract as Agricultural Preserves in Siskiyou County (currently mapped only for the Scott-Shasta-Butte Valley and Tule Lake soil survey areas); other agricultural land of significant importance to the county (currently mapped only for the Scott-Shasta-Butte Valley and Tule Lake soil survey areas); areas previously designated by soil characteristics as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Local Importance that have since become idle; lands enrolled in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Conservation Reserve Program.
SOLANO The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Solano County.
SONOMA The hayland producing areas of the Santa Rosa Plains, Petaluma Valley, and Tubbs Island Naval Reservation. Additional areas also include those lands which are classified as having the capability for producing locally important crops such as grapes, corn, etc., but may not be planted at the present time.
Examples of these areas include the coastal lands from Fort Ross to Stewarts Point, areas surrounding Bloomfield, Two Rock, Chileno Valley, and areas of Sonoma Valley in the vicinity of Big Bend, Vineburg, and Schellville.
STANISLAUS Farmlands growing dryland pasture, dryland small grains, and irrigated pasture.
SUTTER The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Sutter County.
TEHAMA All lands which are not included in Prime, Statewide, or Unique and are cropped continuously or on a cyclic
California Farmland Conversion Report 2008-2010
Page 102
basis (irrigation is not a factor). Also, all lands included in the L category which have soil mapping units listed for Prime or Statewide and which are not irrigated.
TULARE Lands that produce dryland grains (barley and wheat); lands that have physical characteristics that would qualify for "Prime" or "Statewide Important" farmlands except for the lack of irrigation water; and lands that currently support confined livestock, poultry, and/or aquaculture operations.
VENTURA Soils that are listed as Prime or Statewide that are not irrigated, and soils growing dryland crops--beans, grain, dryland walnuts, or dryland apricots.
YOLO Local Importance (L): cultivated farmland having soils which meet the criteria for Prime or Statewide, except that the land is not presently irrigated, and other nonirrigated farmland.
Local Potential (LP): Prime or Statewide soils which are presently not irrigated or cultivated.
YUBA The Board of Supervisors determined that there will be no Farmland of Local Importance for Yuba County.
The Department of Conservation makes no warranties as to the suitability of this product for any particular purpose.
Northern, central, and southern regional views of California’s agricultural diversity.