callaway plant unit 2 eal comparisons and technical bases for … · 2012-12-01 · nei specified...

36
Enclosure B Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for Changes

Upload: others

Post on 10-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B

Callaway Plant Unit 2

EAL Comparisons and

Technical Bases for Changes

Page 2: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 1 Revision 1

Callaway Plant Unit 2 TO NEI 99-01 Rev 5 IC CROSS REFERENCE TABLES The following tables provide cross-references between the NEI 99-01 IC identification number and the Callaway Plant Unit 2 IC identification number:

NEI Rev 5 to Callaway Plant Unit 2 NEI Unit 2 NEI Unit 2 FU1 FU1 SU1 SU1 FA1 FA1 SU2 SU5 FS1 FS1 SU3 SU4 FG1 FG1 SU4 SU9

SU5 SU7 FC1 N/A SU6 SU6 FC2 FC7 SU8 SU3 FC3 FC3 SA2 SA3 FC4 FC4 SA4 SA4 FC6 FC2 SA5 SA1 FC7 N/A SS1 SS1 FC8 FC10 SS2 SS3

SS3 SS2 RC1 N/A SS6 SS4 RC2 RC5 SG1 SG1 RC4 RC6 SG2 SG3 RC6 RC2 RC7 N/A CU1 CU7 RC8 RC10 CU2 CU8

CU3 CU1 CT1 N/A CU4 CU10 CT2 CT8 CU6 CU6 CT3 CT3 CU7 CU2 CT4 CT6 CU8 CU3 CT5 CT9 CA1 CA7 CT6 CT2 CA3 CA1 CT7 N/A CA4 CA10 CT8 CT10 CS1 CS7

CG1 CG7 AU1 RU1 AU2 RU2 HU1 HU3 AA1 RA1 HU2 HU4 AA2 RA2 HU3 HU5 AA3 RA3 HU4 HU1 AS1 RS1 HU5 HU6 AG1 RG1 HA1 HA3

HA2 HA4 HA3 HA5 HA4 HA1 HA5 HA2 HA6 HA6 HS2 HS2 HS3 HS6 HS4 HS1 HG1 HG1 HG2 HG6

Callaway Plant Unit 2 to NEI Rev 5 Unit 2 NEI Unit 2 NEI FG1 FG1 SG1 SG1 FS1 FS1 SS1 SS1 FA1 FA1 SA1 SA5 FU1 FU1 SU1 SU1

SS2 SS3 N/A FC1 SG3 SG2 FC2 FC6 SS3 SS2 FC3 FC3 SA3 SA2 FC4 FC4 SU3 SU8 FC7 FC2 SS4 SS6 N/A FC7 SA4 SA4

FC10 FC8 SU4 SU3 SU5 SU2

N/A RC1 SU6 SU6 RC2 RC6 SU7 SU5 RC5 RC2 SU9 SU4 RC6 RC4 N/A RC7 CA1 CA3

RC10 RC8 CU1 CU3 CU2 CU7

N/A CT1 CU3 CU8 CT2 CT6 CU6 CU6 CT3 CT3 CG7 CG1 CT6 CT4 CS7 CS1 N/A CT7 CA7 CA1 CT8 CT2 CU7 CU1 CT9 CT5 CU8 CU2 CT10 CT8 CA10 CA4

CU10 CU4 RG1 AG1 RS1 AS1 HG1 HG1 RA1 AA1 HS1 HS4 RU1 AU1 HA1 HA4 RA2 AA2 HU1 HU4 RU2 AU2 HS2 HS2 RA3 AA3 HA2 HA5

HA3 HA1 HU3 HU1 HA4 HA2 HU4 HU2 HA5 HA3 HU5 HU3 HG6 HG2 HS6 HS3 HA6 HA6 HU6 HU5

Page 3: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 2 Revision 1

SUMMARY OF DEVIATIONS FROM NEI 99-01 The following tables identify EAL changes that have been evaluated as deviations from the NEI guidance documents and will require prior NRC approval before implementation. A detailed description of the changes and basis for the changes are contained in a following section.

Deviations from NEI 99-01 Rev 5 # NEI Unit 2 NEI Guidance Deviation 1 CT2 CT8 Includes PL threshold for loss of

containment depressurization equipment.

U.S. EPR design is such that this threshold is not applicable.

2 SS6 SA6 SU6

SS4 SA4 SU4

Specifies loss of approximately greater than 75% of plant monitoring instruments in the control room.

U.S. EPR design includes digital monitoring system.

Compensatory indication is not applicable to U.S. EPR.

Removed significant transient from the Alert to provide progression to SAE EAL.

Page 4: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 3 Revision 1

Deviation 1

NEI EAL: CT2 U.S. EPR EAL: CT8

Operational Modes: 1, 2, 3, 4

Description of the Deviation

NEI potential loss threshold 3 specifies containment pressure at the depressurization actuation setpoint with insufficient equipment (sprays and coolers) in operation.

U.S. EPR containment design is such that the design basis accidents do not reach containment design pressure, and therefore there is no automatic depressurization actuation setpoint.

Technical Basis

The U.S. EPR containment volume, condensation surface area, and heat capacities are such that the containment design pressure is not exceeded during design basis Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) and Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) events, In addition, the containment pressure decreases to less than 50% of the accident analysis values in less than 24 hours thus ensuring that radiological dose consequences are acceptable. Mass and energy releases to the containment during LOCA and MSLB events were calculated using RELAP5/MOD2 (B&W), which is an NRC approved methodology. Containment pressure responses were calculated using the GOTHIC code, also an NRC approved methodology. An automatically actuated containment spray system is therefore not required to mitigate the consequences of a Design Basis Accident, so no automatic actuation setpoint exists for this EAL threshold to be based.

Supporting Information

U.S. EPR FSAR – Section 6.2.1

U.S. EPR FSAR – Section 6.2.2

U.S. EPR FSAR – Section 6.5.2

U.S. EPR FSAR – Section 15.0.3

U.S. EPR FSAR – Section 19.2.3.3

Page 5: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 4 Revision 1

Deviation 2

NEI EAL: SS6, SA6, SU6 U.S. EPR EAL: SS4, SA4 and SU4

Operational Modes: 1, 2, 3, 4

Description of the Deviation

NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most (approximately greater than 75%).

U.S. EPR specified the EALs to involve a complete loss of the systems that provide annunciation and safety indication (PICS and SICS). Additionally, it removed the Alert significant transient condition to provide progression to the SAE EAL.

Technical Basis

Annunciation/Indication:

The operator-managed control system of the U.S. EPR consists of two integrated subsystems (Process Information Control System (PICS) and Safety Information and Control System (SICS)) each having a substantial degree of redundancy. The U.S. EPR design provides redundant safety system indications powered from separate uninterruptible power supplies. Being one integrated system managing multiple redundant inputs, the availability of annunciation (alarms) and indication are not separable. Therefore, the loss of annunciation will occur only concurrent with the loss of indication. The loss of safety system indicators impacts the determination of the operability status of that specific system or component. System operability status will be further addressed by the system-based EALs directly impacted by those systems.

Quantification of Failure:

Quantification of percentage failure is not useful in a digital control system. The digital control system is an integrated set of fault-tolerant components as compared to an analog control system, which is an assembly of multiple unrelated independent circuits. The failure of fault-tolerant components will likely not show degraded performance in an escalating manner. Failure is anticipated to be a step change (functional to non-functional) instead of a gradual degradation. Once the step change in performance has occurred, the system will likely no longer be operational. This contrasts with the gradual degradation of analog systems as individual circuits are lost.

Compensatory Indicators:

Each subsystem (PICS or SICS) is designed to be independently capable of providing necessary alarms and indications. The total loss of annunciators or indications would therefore require the loss of both PICS and SICS subsystems. The loss of either a PICS or SICS subsystem alone would leave one fully operable subsystem which would continue to provide all indication and annunciation necessary to manage transients. This exceeds the typical “compensatory indications” which would still be burdened by the loss of alarms/annunciation.

Page 6: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 5 Revision 1

PICS Operability:

PICS will be considered inoperable if:

a. Less than two PICS workstations operable (a workstation is considered operable if 3 or more screens are fully functional)

OR

b. Data on the PICS is unreliable (e.g. system froze due to common mode application software failure)

SICS Operability:

Based on the fact that the SICS includes a reduced inventory of alarms and indications, one operator should be able to manage all alarms and indications for the safety related parameters on the SICS. Therefore, a loss of all four divisions on both workstations would constitute this loss because the qualified display system monitors of the SICS have the capability to display all four divisions of SICS indications on a single qualified display system monitor.

EAL Comparison

UNUSUAL EVENT - This Initiating Condition (IC) and its associated EAL are intended to recognize the difficulty associated with monitoring plant conditions with degradation of a major portion of the annunciation/indication equipment.

Each subsystem (PICS or SICS) is designed to be fully capable of providing alarms and indications of key safety-related parameters. The total loss of annunciators or indications would require the loss of both PICS and SICS subsystems. The loss of both PICS and SICS subsystems would necessarily include loss of compensatory indications which would meet Alert EAL SA4 criteria (therefore no NOUE could be declared).

Total failure of a single subsystem is a highly unlikely event and establishing an escalation pathway from Unusual Event to Alert to Site Area Emergency is desirable. Therefore, the U.S. EPR has chosen to conservatively establish the total failure of either subsystem (PICS or SICS) as an Unusual Event.

ALERT - This IC and its associated EALs are intended to recognize the difficulty associated with monitoring plant conditions with loss of a major portion of the annunciation/indication equipment.

Two distinct EAL combinations exists under this NEI EAL:

1. NEI EAL 1A and 1B Bullet 1 (Loss of Annunciation/Indication and Transient)

Each subsystem (PICS or SICS) is designed to be fully capable of providing key safety-related alarms and indications for detecting and managing the transient. Since the total loss of annunciator/indications (Loss of both PICS and SICS) excludes the availability compensatory indications (Operability of either PICS or

Page 7: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Enclosure B, Attachment 1 Description of Changes and Technical Basis

Callaway Plant Unit 2 Page 6 Revision 1

SICS), there is no equivalent condition to loss of annunciator/indications and transient WITH compensatory indicators available. Conditions meeting NEI EAL Criteria 1A , 1B Bullet 1, and 1B Bullet 2 would instead meet the criteria for a Site Area Emergency under EAL SS4.

The U.S. EPR therefore takes exception to this combination of EAL criteria.

2. NEI EAL 1A and 1B Bullet 2 (Loss of Annunciation/Indication and Compensatory Indication)

U.S. EPR condition 1A and 1B (Loss of PICS and Loss of SICS) is equivalent to NEI conditions 1A and 1B bullet 2 (Loss of annunciation/indication and Loss of compensatory indication).

While there is a difference due to the inherent integration of compensatory indication into each of the two digital subsystems (PICS and SICS), there is no deviation from the intent of this EAL threshold combination.

SITE AREA EMERGENCY - This IC is intended to recognize the threat to plant safety associated with the complete loss of capability of the control room staff to monitor plant response to a SIGNIFICANT TRANSIENT.

A Site Area Emergency is considered to exist if the control room staff cannot monitor safety functions needed for protection of the public while a significant transient is in progress. Quantification is arbitrary; however, if most or all safety system annunciators or indicators are fully lost, there is an increased risk that a degraded plant condition could go undetected.

The U.S. EPR is designed to survive a full offsite load rejection and maintain onsite house loads. Although actions will automatically occur, the inability of the operators to verify proper response increases risk and justifies escalation of emergency classification. A 50% change in power/electrical load was chosen as a reasonable value, less than the design criteria, which was still a substantial challenge to the systems as the threshold criteria.

U.S. EPR deviation in the definition of a significant transient is appropriate for this type of design and is consistent with the conditions warranting an SAE for other reactor design types.

Supporting Information

None

Page 8: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 7

Rev

isio

n 1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

U

NPL

AN

NED

:

A p

aram

eter

cha

nge

or a

n ev

ent t

hat i

s no

t the

resu

lt of

an

inte

nded

evo

lutio

n an

d re

quire

s co

rrec

tive

or m

itiga

tive

actio

ns.

UN

PLA

NN

ED:

A p

aram

eter

cha

nge

or a

n ev

ent,

the

reas

ons

for w

hich

may

be

know

n or

un

know

n, th

at is

not

the

resu

lt of

an

inte

nded

evo

lutio

n an

d re

quire

s co

rrec

tive

or m

itiga

tive

actio

ns.

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed w

ords

to a

llow

the

term

‘une

xpla

ined

’ to

fall

with

in th

e br

oade

r con

text

of

unp

lann

ed.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e Fi

ssio

n Pr

oduc

t Bar

rier D

egra

datio

n

FG

1

Loss

of A

NY

two

barr

iers

AN

D L

oss

or P

oten

tial L

oss

of th

e th

ird b

arrie

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Sta

rtup,

Hot

S

hutd

own

FG1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ny tw

o ba

rrie

rs a

nd lo

ss o

r pot

entia

l los

s of

the

third

bar

rier.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

Ref

er to

fiss

ion

prod

uct b

arrie

r los

s an

d po

tent

ial l

oss

thre

shol

d va

lues

to

dete

rmin

e ba

rrie

r sta

tus.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

FS1

Loss

or P

oten

tial L

oss

of A

NY

two

barr

iers

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Sta

rtup,

Hot

S

hutd

own

FS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

or p

oten

tial l

oss

of a

ny tw

o ba

rrier

s.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

Ref

er to

fiss

ion

prod

uct b

arrie

r los

s an

d po

tent

ial l

oss

thre

shol

d va

lues

to

dete

rmin

e ba

rrie

r sta

tus.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

FA1

AN

Y L

oss

or A

NY

Pot

entia

l Los

s of

EIT

HE

R F

uel C

lad

OR

RC

S.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Sta

rtup,

Hot

S

hutd

own

FA1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Any

loss

or a

ny p

oten

tial l

oss

of e

ither

fuel

cla

d or

RC

S.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

Ref

er to

fiss

ion

prod

uct b

arrie

r los

s an

d po

tent

ial l

oss

thre

shol

d va

lues

to

dete

rmin

e ba

rrie

r sta

tus.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

FU1

AN

Y L

oss

or A

NY

Pot

entia

l Los

s of

Con

tain

men

t.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Sta

rtup,

Hot

S

hutd

own

FU1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Any

loss

or a

ny p

oten

tial l

oss

of c

onta

inm

ent.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

Ref

er to

fiss

ion

prod

uct b

arrie

r los

s an

d po

tent

ial l

oss

thre

shol

d va

lues

to

dete

rmin

e ba

rrie

r sta

tus.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 9: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 8

Rev

isio

n 1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

Fuel

Cla

d B

arrie

r

1.

C

ritic

al S

afet

y Fu

nctio

n S

tatu

s

Loss

A.

Cor

e C

oolin

g - R

ed E

ntry

Con

ditio

ns M

et.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Cor

e C

oolin

g - O

rang

e E

ntry

Con

ditio

ns M

et.

OR

B.

Hea

t Sin

k - R

ed E

ntry

Con

ditio

ns M

et.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t use

CS

FST

for p

lant

ope

ratio

ns.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

6.

Con

tain

men

t Rad

iatio

n M

onito

ring

Loss

A.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r rea

ding

gre

ater

than

(site

spe

cific

va

lue)

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

FC2:

C

onta

inm

ent R

adia

tion

Mon

itorin

g

Loss

1.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r ([J

YK

15 C

R10

1]) >

[Gra

ph F

C2(

L)1]

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

3.

Cor

e E

xit T

herm

ocou

ple

Rea

ding

s

Loss

A.

Cor

e ex

it th

erm

ocou

ples

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

(site

spe

cific

deg

ree

F).

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Cor

e ex

it th

erm

ocou

ples

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

(site

spe

cific

deg

ree

F).

FC3:

C

ore

Tem

pera

ture

Loss

1.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

3 or

hig

her].

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

2].

Diff

eren

ces

Use

d a

gene

raliz

ed F

PB

cat

egor

y tit

le a

s U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t use

CE

TCs.

U.S

. EP

R u

ses

in-c

ore

TCs

to d

evel

op c

alcu

late

d cl

ad te

mps

, whi

ch a

re

appr

oxim

atel

y eq

uiva

lent

to th

e ge

neric

bas

es.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e 4.

R

eact

or V

esse

l Wat

er L

evel

Loss

Not

App

licab

le

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l les

s th

an (s

ite s

peci

fic le

vel f

or T

OAF

).

FC4:

R

PV L

evel

Loss

Non

e

Pote

ntia

l Los

s 1.

a.

R

CS

leve

l ([J

EF1

0 C

L081

]) <

[FC

4(PL

)1.a

]. A

ND

b.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

2 or

hig

her].

Diff

eren

ces

U.S

. EP

R c

anno

t mea

sure

to T

OA

F in

hot

mod

es. L

evel

indi

cate

s lo

wes

t m

easu

rabl

e va

lue

in th

ese

mod

es a

nd in

clud

es a

thre

shol

d fo

r los

s of

su

bcoo

ling.

Thi

s co

mbi

natio

n is

con

sist

ent w

ith th

e m

eani

ng a

nd in

tent

of N

EI

99-0

1.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

2.

Prim

ary

Coo

lant

Act

ivity

Lev

el

Loss

A.

Coo

lant

act

ivity

gre

ater

than

(site

spe

cific

val

ue).

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

FC7:

R

CS

Act

ivity

Loss

1.

Coo

lant

act

ivity

> 3

00 �

Ci/g

m D

ose

Equ

ival

ent I

-131

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

7.

Oth

er S

ite S

peci

fic In

dica

tions

Loss

A.

(Site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

(Site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t hav

e an

y ad

ditio

nal F

PB

thre

shol

ds in

this

cat

egor

y.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

Page 10: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 9

Rev

isio

n 1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

8.

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

Jud

gmen

t

Loss

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Loss

of t

he F

uel C

lad

Bar

rier.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Pot

entia

l Los

s of

the

Fuel

Cla

d B

arrie

r.

FC10

: E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or J

udgm

ent

Loss

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

loss

of t

he fu

el c

lad

barri

er.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

pote

ntia

l los

s of

the

fuel

cla

d ba

rrie

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

RC

S B

arrie

r

1.

C

ritic

al S

afet

y Fu

nctio

n S

tatu

s

Loss

Not

App

licab

le

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

RC

S In

tegr

ity -

Red

Ent

ry C

ondi

tions

Met

.

OR

B.

Hea

t Sin

k - R

ed E

ntry

Con

ditio

ns M

et.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t use

CS

FST

for p

lant

ope

ratio

ns.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

6.

Con

tain

men

t Rad

iatio

n M

onito

ring

Loss

A.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r rea

ding

gre

ater

than

(site

spe

cific

va

lue)

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

RC

2:

Con

tain

men

t Rad

iatio

n M

onito

ring

Loss

1.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r ([J

YK

15 C

R10

1]) >

[RC

2(L)

1] R

/hr.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

2.

RC

S L

eak

Rat

e

Loss

A.

RC

S le

ak ra

te g

reat

er th

an a

vaila

ble

mak

eup

capa

city

as

indi

cate

d by

a

loss

of R

CS

subc

oolin

g.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

RC

S le

ak ra

te g

reat

er th

an (s

ite s

peci

fic c

apac

ity o

f one

cha

rgin

g pu

mp

in th

e no

rmal

cha

rgin

g m

ode)

with

Let

dow

n is

olat

ed.

RC

5:

RC

S Le

ak R

ate

Loss

1.

RC

S le

ak ra

te g

reat

er th

an a

vaila

ble

mak

eup

capa

city

as

indi

cate

d by

[C

alcu

late

d C

lad

Tem

pera

ture

in R

egio

n 2

or h

ighe

r].

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

RC

S le

ak ra

te re

quire

s op

erat

ion

of s

econ

d ch

argi

ng p

ump

to m

aint

ain

pres

suriz

er le

vel.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

4.

SG

Tub

e R

uptu

re

Loss

A.

RU

PTU

RE

D S

G re

sults

in a

n E

CC

S (S

I) ac

tuat

ion.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

RC

6:

SG T

ube

Leak

age

/ Rup

ture

Loss

1.

RU

PTU

RE

D S

G re

sults

in a

n M

HS

I act

uatio

n.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed le

akag

e to

FP

B c

ateg

ory

title

to a

llow

for c

onsi

sten

t num

berin

g w

ith

CT6

(NE

I CT4

).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

7.

Oth

er S

ite S

peci

fic In

dica

tions

Loss

A.

(site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

(site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t hav

e an

y ad

ditio

nal F

PB

thre

shol

ds in

this

cat

egor

y.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

Page 11: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 10

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

8.

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

Jud

gmen

t

Loss

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Loss

of t

he R

CS

Bar

rier.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Pot

entia

l Los

s of

the

RC

S B

arrie

r.

RC

10:

Emer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or J

udgm

ent

Loss

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

loss

of t

he R

CS

bar

rier.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

pote

ntia

l los

s of

the

RC

S b

arrie

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Con

tain

men

t Bar

rier

1.

Crit

ical

Saf

ety

Func

tion

Sta

tus

Loss

Not

App

licab

le

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Con

tain

men

t - R

ed E

ntry

Con

ditio

ns M

et.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t use

CS

FST

for p

lant

ope

ratio

ns.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

6.

C

onta

inm

ent R

adia

tion

Mon

itorin

g

Loss

Not

App

licab

le

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r rea

ding

gre

ater

than

(site

spe

cific

va

lue)

.

CT2

: C

onta

inm

ent R

adia

tion

Mon

itorin

g

Loss

Non

e

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

Con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r ([J

YK

15 C

R10

1]) >

[Gra

ph C

T2(L

)1].

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

3.

Cor

e E

xit T

herm

ocou

ple

Rea

ding

s

Loss

Not

App

licab

le

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

a.

Cor

e ex

it th

erm

ocou

ples

in e

xces

s of

(site

spe

cific

)º F

.

AN

D

b.

Res

tora

tion

proc

edur

es n

ot e

ffect

ive

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es.

OR

B.

a.

Cor

e ex

it th

erm

ocou

ples

in e

xces

s of

(site

spe

cific

)º F

.

AN

D

b.

Rea

ctor

ves

sel l

evel

bel

ow (s

ite s

peci

fic le

vel).

AN

D

c.

Res

tora

tion

proc

edur

es n

ot e

ffect

ive

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es.

CT3

: C

ore

Tem

pera

ture

Loss

Non

e

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

a.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

4].

AN

D

b.

Res

tora

tion

proc

edur

es n

ot e

ffect

ive

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es.

OR

2.

a.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

3].

AN

D

b.

RC

S le

vel (

[JE

F10

CL0

81])

< [C

T3(P

L)2.

b].

AN

D

c.

Res

tora

tion

proc

edur

es n

ot e

ffect

ive

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es.

Diff

eren

ces

Use

d a

gene

raliz

ed F

PB

cat

egor

y tit

le a

s U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t use

CE

TCs.

U.S

. EP

R u

ses

in-c

ore

TCs

to d

evel

op c

alcu

late

d cl

ad te

mps

, whi

ch a

re

appr

oxim

atel

y eq

uiva

lent

to th

e ge

neric

bas

es.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 12: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 11

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

4.

SG

Sec

onda

ry S

ide

Rel

ease

with

P to

S L

eaka

ge

Loss

A.

RU

PTU

RE

D S

G is

als

o FA

ULT

ED o

utsi

de o

f con

tain

men

t.

OR

B.

a.

Prim

ary-

to-S

econ

dary

leak

rate

gre

ater

than

10

gpm

.

AN

D

b.

UN

ISO

LAB

LE s

team

rele

ase

from

affe

cted

SG

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

CT6

: SG

Tub

e Le

akag

e / R

uptu

re

Loss

1.

RU

PTU

RE

D S

G is

als

o FA

ULT

ED o

utsi

de o

f con

tain

men

t.

OR

2.

a.

Prim

ary-

to-S

econ

dary

leak

rate

> 1

0 gp

m.

AN

D

b.

UN

ISO

LAB

LE s

team

rele

ase

from

affe

cted

SG

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Rev

ised

FP

B c

ateg

ory

title

to a

llow

for c

onsi

sten

t num

berin

g w

ith R

C6

(NE

I R

C4)

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

2.

Con

tain

men

t Pre

ssur

e

Loss

A.

A c

onta

inm

ent p

ress

ure

rise

follo

wed

by

a ra

pid

unex

plai

ned

drop

in

cont

ainm

ent p

ress

ure.

OR

B.

Con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e or

sum

p le

vel r

espo

nse

not c

onsi

sten

t with

LO

CA

con

ditio

ns.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e gr

eate

r tha

n (s

ite s

peci

fic v

alue

) and

risi

ng.

OR

B.

Exp

losi

ve m

ixtu

re e

xist

s in

side

con

tain

men

t.

OR

C.

a.

Pre

ssur

e gr

eate

r tha

n co

ntai

nmen

t dep

ress

uriz

atio

n ac

tuat

ion

setp

oint

.

AN

D

b.

Less

than

one

full

train

of d

epre

ssur

izat

ion

equi

pmen

t ope

ratin

g.

CT8

: C

onta

inm

ent P

ress

ure

Loss

1.

A c

onta

inm

ent p

ress

ure

rise

follo

wed

by

a ra

pid

UN

PLAN

NED

dro

p in

co

ntai

nmen

t pre

ssur

e.

OR

2.

Con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e or

IRW

ST

leve

l res

pons

e no

t con

sist

ent w

ith L

OC

A

cond

ition

s.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

Con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e >

62 p

sig

and

risin

g.

OR

2.

Con

tain

men

t Hyd

roge

n >

4%.

Diff

eren

ces

Rep

lace

‘une

xpla

ined

’ with

unp

lann

ed to

pre

vent

pot

entia

l con

fusi

on in

the

use

of s

epar

ate

term

s.

Dev

iatio

ns (D

evia

tion

#1)

(PL)

C: T

his

FPB

thre

shol

d w

as n

ot u

sed.

Con

tain

men

t spr

ay a

nd c

oole

rs a

re

not s

afet

y re

late

d or

cre

dite

d fo

r em

erge

ncy

depr

essu

rizat

ion

actu

atio

n co

nditi

ons

at U

.S. E

PR

.

5.

CN

MT

Isol

atio

n Fa

ilure

or B

ypas

s

Loss

A.

a.

Failu

re o

f all

isol

atio

n va

lves

in a

ny o

ne li

ne to

clo

se.

AN

D

b.

Dire

ct d

owns

tream

pat

hway

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t exi

sts

afte

r co

ntai

nmen

t iso

latio

n si

gnal

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Not

App

licab

le

CT9

: C

onta

inm

ent I

sola

tion

Failu

re o

r Byp

ass

Loss

1.

a.

Failu

re o

f ALL

isol

atio

n va

lves

in a

ny o

ne li

ne to

clo

se.

AN

D

b.

Dire

ct d

owns

tream

pat

hway

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t exi

sts

afte

r co

ntai

nmen

t iso

latio

n si

gnal

.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

Non

e

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

7.

Oth

er S

ite S

peci

fic In

dica

tions

Loss

A.

(site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

(site

spe

cific

) as

appl

icab

le.

N/A

Not

e: U

.S. E

PR

doe

s no

t hav

e an

y ad

ditio

nal F

PB

thre

shol

ds in

this

cat

egor

y.

Diff

eren

ces

N/A

Dev

iatio

ns

N/A

Page 13: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 12

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

8.

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

Jud

gmen

t

Loss

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Loss

of t

he C

onta

inm

ent B

arrie

r.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

A.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or th

at in

dica

tes

Pot

entia

l Los

s of

the

Con

tain

men

t Bar

rier.

CT1

0:

Emer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or J

udgm

ent

Loss

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

loss

of t

he c

onta

inm

ent b

arrie

r.

Pote

ntia

l Los

s

1.

Any

con

ditio

n in

the

opin

ion

of th

e E

mer

genc

y C

oord

inat

or th

at in

dica

tes

pote

ntia

l los

s of

the

cont

ainm

ent b

arrie

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Abn

orm

al R

adio

logi

cal C

ondi

tion

/ Abn

orm

al R

ad E

fflue

nt R

elea

ses

AG

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Off-

site

dos

e re

sulti

ng fr

om a

n ac

tual

or I

MM

INE

NT

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us

radi

oact

ivity

gre

ater

than

100

0 m

rem

TE

DE

or 5

000

mre

m T

hyro

id C

DE

for t

he

actu

al o

r pro

ject

ed d

urat

ion

of th

e re

leas

e us

ing

actu

al m

eteo

rolo

gy.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

or 4

)

Not

e: T

he E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or s

houl

d no

t wai

t unt

il th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e ha

s el

apse

d, b

ut s

houl

d de

clar

e th

e ev

ent a

s so

on a

s it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e co

nditi

on w

ill li

kely

exc

eed

the

appl

icab

le ti

me.

If d

ose

asse

ssm

ent r

esul

ts a

re

avai

labl

e, d

ecla

ratio

n sh

ould

be

base

d on

dos

e as

sess

men

t ins

tead

of

radi

atio

n m

onito

r val

ues.

Do

not d

elay

dec

lara

tion

awai

ting

dose

ass

essm

ent

resu

lts.

1.

VA

LID

read

ing

on A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

radi

atio

n m

onito

rs g

reat

er th

an th

e re

adin

g sh

own

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger:

(site

spe

cific

mon

itor l

ist a

nd th

resh

old

valu

es)

2.

Dos

e as

sess

men

t usi

ng a

ctua

l met

eoro

logy

indi

cate

s do

ses

grea

ter t

han

1000

mre

m T

EDE

or 5

000

mre

m th

yroi

d C

DE

at o

r bey

ond

the

site

bo

unda

ry.

3.

VA

LID

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

1000

m

R/h

r for

15

min

utes

or l

onge

r. [fo

r site

s ha

ving

tele

met

ered

per

imet

er

mon

itors

]

4.

Fiel

d su

rvey

resu

lts in

dica

te c

lose

d w

indo

w d

ose

rate

s gr

eate

r tha

n 10

00

mR

/hr e

xpec

ted

to c

ontin

ue fo

r 60

min

utes

or l

onge

r; or

ana

lyse

s of

fiel

d su

rvey

sam

ples

indi

cate

thyr

oid

CD

E g

reat

er th

an 5

000

mre

m fo

r one

hou

r of

inha

latio

n, a

t or b

eyon

d si

te b

ound

ary.

RG

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Offs

ite d

ose

resu

lting

from

an

actu

al o

r IM

MIN

EN

T re

leas

e of

gas

eous

ra

dioa

ctiv

ity g

reat

er th

an 1

000

mR

em T

EDE

or 5

000

mR

em T

hyro

id C

DE

for

the

actu

al o

r pro

ject

ed d

urat

ion

of th

e re

leas

e us

ing

actu

al m

eteo

rolo

gy.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

Not

e: If

dos

e as

sess

men

t res

ults

are

ava

ilabl

e, d

ecla

ratio

n sh

ould

be

base

d on

dos

e as

sess

men

t ins

tead

of r

adia

tion

mon

itor v

alue

s. D

o no

t del

ay

decl

arat

ion

awai

ting

dose

ass

essm

ent r

esul

ts.

1.

Ven

t Sta

ck N

oble

Gas

([K

LK90

FR

001]

) > [R

G1.

1] �

Ci/h

r for

15

min

utes

or

long

er.

OR

2.

Dos

e as

sess

men

t usi

ng a

ctua

l met

eoro

logy

indi

cate

s do

ses

at o

r bey

ond

the

site

bou

ndar

y of

EIT

HER

of t

he fo

llow

ing:

� >

1000

mR

em T

ED

E

� >

5000

mR

em C

DE

Thy

roid

OR

3.

Fiel

d su

rvey

resu

lts a

t or b

eyon

d th

e si

te b

ound

ary

indi

cate

EIT

HER

of t

he

follo

win

g:

� G

amm

a (c

lose

d w

indo

w) d

ose

rate

> 1

000

mR

/hr f

or 6

0 m

inut

es o

r lo

nger

.

� A

ir sa

mpl

es a

naly

sis

> 50

00 m

Rem

CD

E T

hyro

id fo

r one

hou

r of

inha

latio

n.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

Ls R

G1.

2 an

d R

G1.

3 ar

e co

nsid

ered

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

The

first

not

e se

nten

ce h

as b

een

mov

ed to

the

clas

sific

atio

n de

scrip

tion

and

inst

ruct

ions

sec

tion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

NE

I AG

1.3

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 14: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 13

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

AS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Off-

site

dos

e re

sulti

ng fr

om a

n ac

tual

or I

MM

INE

NT

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us

radi

oact

ivity

gre

ater

than

100

mre

m T

ED

E o

r 500

mre

m T

hyro

id C

DE

for t

he

actu

al o

r pro

ject

ed d

urat

ion

of th

e re

leas

e.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

or 4

)

Not

e: T

he E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or s

houl

d no

t wai

t unt

il th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e ha

s el

apse

d, b

ut s

houl

d de

clar

e th

e ev

ent a

s so

on a

s it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e co

nditi

on w

ill li

kely

exc

eed

the

appl

icab

le ti

me.

If d

ose

asse

ssm

ent r

esul

ts a

re

avai

labl

e, d

ecla

ratio

n sh

ould

be

base

d on

dos

e as

sess

men

t ins

tead

of

radi

atio

n m

onito

r val

ues.

Do

not d

elay

dec

lara

tion

awai

ting

dose

ass

essm

ent

resu

lts.

1.

VA

LID

read

ing

on A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

radi

atio

n m

onito

rs g

reat

er th

an th

e re

adin

g sh

own

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger:

(site

spe

cific

mon

itor l

ist a

nd th

resh

old

valu

es)

2.

Dos

e as

sess

men

t usi

ng a

ctua

l met

eoro

logy

indi

cate

s do

ses

grea

ter t

han

100

mre

m T

EDE

or 5

00 m

rem

thyr

oid

CD

E a

t or b

eyon

d th

e si

te b

ound

ary.

3.

VA

LID

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

100

mR

/hr f

or 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

[for s

ites

havi

ng te

lem

eter

ed p

erim

eter

m

onito

rs]

4.

Fiel

d su

rvey

resu

lts in

dica

te c

lose

d w

indo

w d

ose

rate

s gr

eate

r tha

n 10

0 m

R/h

r exp

ecte

d to

con

tinue

for 6

0 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger;

or a

naly

ses

of fi

eld

surv

ey s

ampl

es in

dica

te th

yroi

d C

DE

gre

ater

than

500

mre

m fo

r one

hou

r of

inha

latio

n, a

t or b

eyon

d th

e si

te b

ound

ary.

RS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Offs

ite d

ose

resu

lting

from

an

actu

al o

r IM

MIN

EN

T re

leas

e of

gas

eous

ra

dioa

ctiv

ity g

reat

er th

an 1

00 m

Rem

TE

DE

or 5

00 m

Rem

Thy

roid

CD

E fo

r the

ac

tual

or p

roje

cted

dur

atio

n of

the

rele

ase

usin

g ac

tual

met

eoro

logy

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

Not

e: If

dos

e as

sess

men

t res

ults

are

ava

ilabl

e, d

ecla

ratio

n sh

ould

be

base

d on

dos

e as

sess

men

t ins

tead

of r

adia

tion

mon

itor v

alue

s. D

o no

t del

ay

decl

arat

ion

awai

ting

dose

ass

essm

ent r

esul

ts.

1.

Ven

t Sta

ck N

oble

Gas

([K

LK90

FR

001]

) > [R

S1.1

] �C

i/hr f

or 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

OR

2.

Dos

e as

sess

men

t usi

ng a

ctua

l met

eoro

logy

indi

cate

s do

ses

at o

r bey

ond

the

site

bou

ndar

y of

EIT

HER

of t

he fo

llow

ing:

� >

100

mR

em T

ED

E

� >

500

mR

em C

DE

Thyr

oid

OR

3.

Fiel

d su

rvey

resu

lts a

t or b

eyon

d th

e si

te b

ound

ary

indi

cate

EIT

HER

of t

he

follo

win

g:

� G

amm

a (c

lose

d w

indo

w) d

ose

rate

> 1

00 m

R/h

r for

60

min

utes

or

long

er.

� A

ir sa

mpl

e an

alys

is >

500

mR

em C

DE

Thy

roid

for o

ne h

our o

f in

hala

tion.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

Ls R

S1.

2 an

d R

S1.

3 ar

e co

nsid

ered

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed IC

wor

ding

“usi

ng a

ctua

l met

eoro

logy

” to

be c

onsi

sten

t with

the

EA

L,

basi

s an

d R

G1

IC (N

EI A

G1)

.

The

first

not

e se

nten

ce h

as b

een

mov

ed to

the

clas

sific

atio

n de

scrip

tion

and

inst

ruct

ions

sec

tion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

NE

I AS

1.3

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 15: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 14

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

AA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Any

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us o

r liq

uid

radi

oact

ivity

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t gre

ater

than

20

0 tim

es th

e R

adio

logi

cal E

fflue

nt T

echn

ical

Spe

cific

atio

ns/O

DC

M fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

or 4

or 5

)

Not

e: T

he E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or s

houl

d no

t wai

t unt

il th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e ha

s el

apse

d, b

ut s

houl

d de

clar

e th

e ev

ent a

s so

on a

s it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e re

leas

e du

ratio

n ha

s ex

ceed

ed, o

r will

likel

y ex

ceed

, the

app

licab

le ti

me.

In th

e ab

senc

e of

dat

a to

the

cont

rary

, ass

ume

that

the

rele

ase

dura

tion

has

exce

eded

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

if an

ong

oing

rele

ase

is d

etec

ted

and

the

rele

ase

star

t tim

e is

unk

now

n.

1.

VA

LID

read

ing

on A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

radi

atio

n m

onito

rs g

reat

er th

an th

e re

adin

g sh

own

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger:

(site

spe

cific

mon

itor l

ist a

nd th

resh

old

valu

es)

2.

VA

LID

read

ing

on a

ny e

fflue

nt m

onito

r rea

ding

gre

ater

than

200

tim

es th

e al

arm

set

poin

t est

ablis

hed

by a

cur

rent

radi

oact

ivity

dis

char

ge p

erm

it fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

3.

Con

firm

ed s

ampl

e an

alys

es fo

r gas

eous

or l

iqui

d re

leas

es in

dica

tes

conc

entra

tions

or r

elea

se ra

tes

grea

ter t

han

200

times

(site

spe

cific

RE

TS

valu

es) f

or 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

4.

VA

LID

read

ing

on p

erim

eter

radi

atio

n m

onito

ring

syst

em re

adin

g gr

eate

r th

an 1

0.0

mR

/hr a

bove

nor

mal

* bac

kgro

und

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

[for

site

s ha

ving

tele

met

ered

per

imet

er m

onito

rs]

5.

VA

LID

indi

catio

n on

aut

omat

ic re

al-ti

me

dose

ass

essm

ent c

apab

ility

indi

catin

g gr

eate

r tha

n (s

ite s

peci

fic v

alue

) for

15

min

utes

or l

onge

r. [fo

r si

tes

havi

ng s

uch

capa

bilit

y]

* N

orm

al c

an b

e co

nsid

ered

as

the

high

est r

eadi

ng in

the

past

twen

ty-fo

ur

hour

s ex

clud

ing

the

curr

ent p

eak

valu

e.

RA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Any

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us o

r liq

uid

radi

oact

ivity

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t gre

ater

than

20

0 tim

es th

e O

DC

M li

mit

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

Not

e: In

the

abse

nce

of d

ata

to th

e co

ntra

ry, a

ssum

e th

at th

e re

leas

e du

ratio

n ha

s ex

ceed

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e if

an o

ngoi

ng re

leas

e is

det

ecte

d an

d th

e re

leas

e st

art t

ime

is u

nkno

wn.

1.

Ven

t Sta

ck N

oble

Gas

([K

LK90

FR

001]

) > [R

A1.

1] �

Ci/h

r for

15

min

utes

or

long

er.

OR

2.

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g ef

fluen

t mon

itors

> 2

00 ti

mes

the

OD

CM

lim

it es

tabl

ishe

d by

a c

urre

nt ra

dioa

ctiv

ity d

isch

arge

per

mit

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lo

nger

:

� R

ad W

aste

Bui

ldin

g Tr

ansf

er T

ank

Dis

char

ge L

ine

Activ

ity M

onito

r ([K

PK

29 C

R00

1/00

2])

� D

isch

arge

per

mit

spec

ified

mon

itor

OR

3.

Con

firm

ed s

ampl

e an

alys

is fo

r gas

eous

or l

iqui

d re

leas

es >

200

tim

es th

e O

DC

M li

mit

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Diff

eren

ces

The

first

not

e se

nten

ce h

as b

een

mov

ed to

the

clas

sific

atio

n de

scrip

tion

and

inst

ruct

ions

sec

tion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

ds ‘r

eadi

ng’ a

nd ‘i

ndic

ate’

for h

uman

fact

ors

cons

ider

atio

ns

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

RU

1.2

spec

ifies

the

OD

CM

lim

it as

the

high

ala

rm is

set

at a

frac

tion

of th

e O

DC

M.

NE

I AA

1.4

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

.

NE

I AA

1.5

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

n au

tom

atic

real

-tim

e do

se a

sses

smen

t sys

tem

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 16: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 15

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

AU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Any

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us o

r liq

uid

radi

oact

ivity

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t gre

ater

than

2

times

the

Rad

iolo

gica

l Effl

uent

Tec

hnic

al S

peci

ficat

ions

/OD

CM

for 6

0 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

or 4

or 5

)

Not

e: T

he E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or s

houl

d no

t wai

t unt

il th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e ha

s el

apse

d, b

ut s

houl

d de

clar

e th

e ev

ent a

s so

on a

s it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e re

leas

e du

ratio

n ha

s ex

ceed

ed, o

r will

likel

y ex

ceed

, the

app

licab

le ti

me.

In th

e ab

senc

e of

dat

a to

the

cont

rary

, ass

ume

that

the

rele

ase

dura

tion

has

exce

eded

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

if an

ong

oing

rele

ase

is d

etec

ted

and

the

rele

ase

star

t tim

e is

unk

now

n.

1.

VA

LID

read

ing

on A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

radi

atio

n m

onito

rs g

reat

er th

an th

e re

adin

g sh

own

for 6

0 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger:

(site

spe

cific

mon

itor l

ist a

nd th

resh

old

valu

es)

2.

VA

ILD

read

ing

on a

ny e

fflue

nt m

onito

r rea

ding

gre

ater

than

2 ti

mes

the

alar

m s

etpo

int e

stab

lishe

d by

a c

urre

nt ra

dioa

ctiv

ity d

isch

arge

per

mit

for

60 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

3.

Con

firm

ed s

ampl

e an

alys

es fo

r gas

eous

or l

iqui

d re

leas

es in

dica

tes

conc

entra

tions

or r

elea

se ra

tes

grea

ter t

han

2 tim

es (s

ite s

peci

fic R

ETS

va

lues

) for

60

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

4.

VA

ILD

read

ing

on p

erim

eter

radi

atio

n m

onito

ring

syst

em re

adin

g gr

eate

r th

an 0

.10

mR

/hr a

bove

nor

mal

* bac

kgro

und

for 6

0 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

[for

site

s ha

ving

tele

met

ered

per

imet

er m

onito

rs]

5.

VA

ILD

indi

catio

n on

aut

omat

ic re

al-ti

me

dose

ass

essm

ent c

apab

ility

indi

catin

g gr

eate

r tha

n (s

ite s

peci

fic v

alue

) for

60

min

utes

or l

onge

r. [fo

r si

tes

havi

ng s

uch

capa

bilit

y]

* N

orm

al c

an b

e co

nsid

ered

as

the

high

est r

eadi

ng in

the

past

twen

ty-fo

ur

hour

s ex

clud

ing

the

curr

ent p

eak

valu

e.

RU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Any

rele

ase

of g

aseo

us o

r liq

uid

radi

oact

ivity

to th

e en

viro

nmen

t gre

ater

than

2

times

the

OD

CM

lim

it fo

r 60

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

Not

e: In

the

abse

nce

of d

ata

to th

e co

ntra

ry, a

ssum

e th

at th

e re

leas

e du

ratio

n ha

s ex

ceed

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e if

an o

ngoi

ng re

leas

e is

det

ecte

d an

d th

e re

leas

e st

art t

ime

is u

nkno

wn.

1.

Ven

t Sta

ck N

oble

Gas

([K

LK90

FR

001]

) > [R

U1.

1] �

Ci/h

r for

60

min

utes

or

long

er.

OR

2.

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g ef

fluen

t mon

itors

> 2

tim

es th

e O

DC

M li

mit

esta

blis

hed

by a

cur

rent

radi

oact

ivity

dis

char

ge p

erm

it fo

r 60

min

utes

or

long

er:

� R

ad W

aste

Bui

ldin

g Tr

ansf

er T

ank

Dis

char

ge L

ine

Activ

ity M

onito

r ([K

PK

29 C

R00

1/00

2])

� D

isch

arge

per

mit

spec

ified

mon

itor

OR

3.

Con

firm

ed s

ampl

e an

alys

is fo

r gas

eous

or l

iqui

d re

leas

es >

2 ti

mes

the

OD

CM

lim

it fo

r 60

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Diff

eren

ces

The

first

not

e se

nten

ce h

as b

een

mov

ed to

the

clas

sific

atio

n de

scrip

tion

and

inst

ruct

ions

sec

tion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

ds ‘r

eadi

ng’ a

nd ‘i

ndic

ate’

for h

uman

fact

ors

cons

ider

atio

ns (m

inim

ize

extra

neou

s w

ords

).

RU

1.2

spec

ifies

the

OD

CM

lim

it as

the

high

ala

rm is

set

at a

frac

tion

of th

e O

DC

M.

NE

I AU

1.4

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

per

imet

er ra

diat

ion

mon

itorin

g sy

stem

.

NE

I AU

1.5

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 b

ecau

se th

e pl

ant i

s no

t equ

ippe

d w

ith a

n au

tom

atic

real

-tim

e do

se a

sses

smen

t sys

tem

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 17: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 16

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

AA

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Dam

age

to ir

radi

ated

fuel

or l

oss

of w

ater

leve

l tha

t has

resu

lted

or w

ill re

sult

in

the

unco

verin

g of

irra

diat

ed fu

el o

utsi

de th

e re

acto

r ves

sel.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

A w

ater

leve

l dro

p in

the

reac

tor r

efue

ling

cavi

ty, s

pent

fuel

poo

l or f

uel

trans

fer c

anal

that

will

resu

lt in

irra

diat

ed fu

el b

ecom

ing

unco

vere

d.

2.

A V

ALI

D a

larm

or (

site

spe

cific

ele

vate

d re

adin

g) o

n A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

due

to d

amag

e to

irra

diat

ed fu

el o

r los

s of

wat

er le

vel.

(site

spe

cific

radi

atio

n m

onito

rs)

RA

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Dam

age

to ir

radi

ated

fuel

or l

oss

of w

ater

leve

l tha

t has

resu

lted

or w

ill re

sult

in

the

unco

verin

g of

irra

diat

ed fu

el o

utsi

de th

e re

acto

r ves

sel.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

A w

ater

leve

l dro

p in

the

reac

tor r

efue

ling

cavi

ty, s

pent

fuel

poo

l or f

uel

trans

fer c

anal

that

will

resu

lt in

irra

diat

ed fu

el b

ecom

ing

unco

vere

d.

OR

2.

>100

0 m

R/h

r on

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g du

e to

dam

age

to ir

radi

ated

fuel

or

loss

of w

ater

leve

l:

� R

eact

or B

uild

ing

Ref

uelin

g B

ridge

Are

a D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

15

CR

003]

) �

Fuel

Bui

ldin

g S

pent

Fue

l Mas

t Brid

ge D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

28

CR

002]

) �

Fuel

Bui

ldin

g Fu

el P

ool D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

28 C

R00

1])

� Tr

ansf

er P

it D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

23 C

R00

1])

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

AU

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

UN

PLA

NN

ED

rise

in p

lant

radi

atio

n le

vels

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

a.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

wat

er le

vel d

rop

in a

reac

tor r

efue

ling

path

way

as

indi

cate

d by

(site

spe

cific

leve

l or i

ndic

atio

n).

AN

D

b.

VA

LID

Are

a R

adia

tion

Mon

itor r

eadi

ng ri

se o

n (s

ite s

peci

fic li

st).

2.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

VA

LID

Are

a R

adia

tion

Mon

itor r

eadi

ngs

or s

urve

y re

sults

in

dica

te a

rise

by

a fa

ctor

of 1

000

over

nor

mal

* lev

els.

*Nor

mal

leve

ls c

an b

e co

nsid

ered

as

the

high

est r

eadi

ng in

the

past

twen

ty-

four

hou

rs e

xclu

ding

the

curr

ent p

eak

valu

e.

RU

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

UN

PLA

NN

ED

rise

in p

lant

radi

atio

n le

vels

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

a.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

wat

er le

vel d

rop

in th

e re

acto

r ref

uelin

g ca

vity

, spe

nt

fuel

poo

l or f

uel t

rans

fer c

anal

as

indi

cate

d by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g:

� R

eact

or re

fuel

ing

cavi

ty le

vel (

[FA

K31

CL0

03 o

r CL0

04])

< [R

U2.

1.a(

b1)]

feet

. �

Spe

nt fu

el p

ool l

evel

([FA

L18

CL0

01])

< [R

U2.

1.a(

b2)]

feet

. �

Fuel

tran

sfer

can

al le

vel (

[FA

L18

CL0

04 o

r CL0

05])

< [R

U2.

1.a(

b3)]

feet

.

� R

epor

t of v

isua

l obs

erva

tion.

AN

D

b.

Are

a ra

diat

ion

mon

itor r

ise

on A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing:

Rea

ctor

Bui

ldin

g R

efue

ling

Brid

ge A

rea

Dos

e R

ate

Mon

itor

([JY

K15

CR

003]

) �

Fuel

Bui

ldin

g S

pent

Fue

l Mas

t Brid

ge D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

28

CR

002]

) �

Fuel

Bui

ldin

g Fu

el P

ool D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

28 C

R00

1])

� Tr

ansf

er P

it D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

23 C

R00

1])

OR

2.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

are

a ra

diat

ion

mon

itor o

r rad

iatio

n su

rvey

> 1

000

times

N

OR

MA

L LE

VELS

.

Diff

eren

ces

Spe

cifie

d co

mpo

nent

s of

‘rea

ctor

refu

elin

g pa

thw

ay’ t

o be

con

sist

ent w

ith R

A2

(AA

2).

Cre

ated

NO

RM

AL

LEV

ELS

as

a de

fined

term

for c

onsi

sten

cy w

ithin

the

sche

me.

Rem

oved

‘VA

LID

’. A

ll E

ALs

and

FB

Ps

pres

ume

valid

indi

catio

ns, r

epor

ts o

r co

nditi

ons

as e

xpla

ined

in th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion.

Val

id is

a fu

ndam

enta

l ins

truct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

ds ‘r

eadi

ng’ a

nd ‘i

ndic

ate’

for h

uman

fact

ors

cons

ider

atio

ns

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 18: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 17

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

AA

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Ris

e in

radi

atio

n le

vels

with

in th

e fa

cilit

y th

at im

pede

s op

erat

ion

of s

yste

ms

requ

ired

to m

aint

ain

plan

t saf

ety

func

tions

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

Dos

e ra

te g

reat

er th

an 1

5 m

R/h

r AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g ar

eas

requ

iring

co

ntin

uous

occ

upan

cy to

mai

ntai

n pl

ant s

afet

y fu

nctio

ns:

(site

spe

cific

are

a lis

t)

RA

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Ris

e in

radi

atio

n le

vels

with

in th

e fa

cilit

y th

at im

pede

s op

erat

ion

of s

yste

ms

requ

ired

to m

aint

ain

plan

t saf

ety

func

tions

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Dos

e ra

te >

15

mR

/hr i

n A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

area

s re

quiri

ng c

ontin

uous

oc

cupa

ncy

to m

aint

ain

plan

t saf

ety

func

tions

: �

Con

trol R

oom

Cen

tral A

larm

Sta

tion

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Haz

ards

and

Oth

er C

ondi

tions

Affe

ctin

g Pl

ant S

afet

y

H

G1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

resu

lting

in lo

ss o

f phy

sica

l con

trol o

f the

faci

lity.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

(1 o

r 2)

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N h

as o

ccur

red

such

that

pla

nt p

erso

nnel

are

una

ble

to

oper

ate

equi

pmen

t req

uire

d to

mai

ntai

n sa

fety

func

tions

.

2.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N h

as c

ause

d fa

ilure

of S

pent

Fue

l Coo

ling

Sys

tem

s an

d IM

MIN

ENT

fuel

dam

age

is li

kely

for a

fres

hly

off-l

oade

d re

acto

r cor

e in

po

ol.

HG

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

resu

lting

in lo

ss o

f phy

sica

l con

trol o

f the

faci

lity.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N h

as o

ccur

red

such

that

pla

nt p

erso

nnel

are

una

ble

to

oper

ate

equi

pmen

t req

uire

d to

mai

ntai

n sa

fety

func

tions

.

OR

2.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N h

as c

ause

d fa

ilure

of s

pent

fuel

coo

ling

syst

ems

and

IMM

INE

NT

fuel

dam

age

is li

kely

.

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

‘for

a fr

eshl

y of

f-loa

ded

reac

tor c

ore

in p

ool’

to e

limin

ate

unne

cess

ary

com

plic

atio

n. O

pera

tors

do

not t

rack

day

s si

nce

offlo

ad in

the

Con

trol R

oom

and

imm

inen

t dam

age

will

appl

y to

any

type

of f

uel i

n th

e po

ol.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HS4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N is

occ

urrin

g or

has

occ

urre

d w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D

AR

EA

as

repo

rted

by th

e (s

ite s

ecur

ity s

hift

supe

rvis

ion)

.

HS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N is

occ

urrin

g or

has

occ

urre

d w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D

AR

EA

as

repo

rted

by th

e S

ecur

ity S

hift

Sup

ervi

sor.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HA

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

with

in th

e O

WN

ER C

ON

TRO

LLED

AR

EA

or a

irbor

ne

atta

ck th

reat

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

(1 o

r 2)

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N is

occ

urrin

g or

has

occ

urre

d w

ithin

the

OW

NE

R

CO

NTR

OLE

D A

RE

A a

s re

porte

d by

the

(site

spe

cific

sec

urity

shi

ft su

perv

isio

n).

2.

A v

alid

ated

not

ifica

tion

from

NR

C o

f an

airli

ner a

ttack

thre

at w

ithin

30

min

utes

of t

he s

ite.

HA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

with

in th

e O

WN

ER C

ON

TRO

LLED

AR

EA

or a

irbor

ne

atta

ck th

reat

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

A H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N is

occ

urrin

g or

has

occ

urre

d w

ithin

the

OW

NE

R

CO

NTR

OLL

ED A

RE

A a

s re

porte

d by

the

Sec

urity

Shi

ft S

uper

viso

r.

OR

2.

A v

alid

ated

not

ifica

tion

from

the

NR

C o

f a L

AR

GE

AIR

CR

AFT

atta

ck th

reat

w

ithin

30

min

utes

of t

he s

ite.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nged

airl

iner

to la

rge

airc

raft.

Usi

ng la

rge

airc

raft

incl

udes

non

-airl

ine

owne

d la

rge

airc

raft

and

is th

eref

ore

mor

e co

mpr

ehen

sive

and

app

ropr

iate

, w

hile

mai

ntai

ning

the

mea

ning

and

inte

nt.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 19: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 18

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HU

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

– N

OTI

F O

F U

NU

SUA

L EV

ENT

Con

firm

ed S

ECU

RIT

Y C

ON

DIT

ION

or t

hrea

t whi

ch in

dica

tes

a po

tent

ial

degr

adat

ion

in th

e le

vel o

f saf

ety

of th

e pl

ant.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

)

1.

A S

EC

UR

ITY

CO

ND

ITIO

N th

at d

oes

NO

T in

volv

e a

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

as

repo

rted

by th

e (s

ite s

peci

fic s

ecur

ity s

hift

supe

rvis

ion)

.

2.

A c

redi

ble

site

spe

cific

sec

urity

thre

at n

otifi

catio

n.

3.

A v

alid

ated

not

ifica

tion

from

NR

C p

rovi

ding

info

rmat

ion

of a

n ai

rcra

ft th

reat

.

HU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Con

firm

ed S

ECU

RIT

Y C

ON

DIT

ION

or t

hrea

t, w

hich

indi

cate

s a

pote

ntia

l de

grad

atio

n in

the

leve

l of s

afet

y of

the

plan

t.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

A S

EC

UR

ITY

CO

ND

ITIO

N th

at d

oes

not i

nvol

ve a

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

as

repo

rted

by th

e S

ecur

ity S

hift

Sup

ervi

sor.

OR

2.

A c

redi

ble

site

-spe

cific

sec

urity

thre

at n

otifi

catio

n.

OR

3.

A v

alid

ated

not

ifica

tion

from

the

NR

C p

rovi

ding

info

rmat

ion

of a

n ai

rcra

ft th

reat

.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HS2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Con

trol r

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

and

pla

nt c

ontro

l can

not b

e es

tabl

ishe

d.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

a.

Con

trol r

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

.

AN

D

b.

Con

trol o

f the

pla

nt c

anno

t be

esta

blis

hed

with

in (s

ite s

peci

fic

min

utes

).

HS2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Con

trol R

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

and

pla

nt c

ontro

l can

not b

e es

tabl

ishe

d.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

a.

Con

trol R

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

.

AN

D

b.

Con

trol o

f the

pla

nt c

anno

t be

esta

blis

hed

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HA

5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Con

trol r

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

(Site

-spe

cific

pro

cedu

re) r

equi

res

cont

rol r

oom

eva

cuat

ion.

HA

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Con

trol R

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Con

trol R

oom

eva

cuat

ion

has

been

initi

ated

.

Diff

eren

ces

Rew

orde

d EA

L to

be

cons

iste

nt w

ith IC

and

to e

limin

ate

the

need

to re

ly o

n a

proc

edur

e re

fere

nce

as a

thre

shol

d (h

uman

fact

ors)

. Thi

s do

es n

ot c

hang

e th

e m

eani

ng o

r int

ent.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 20: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 19

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Nat

ural

or d

estru

ctiv

e ph

enom

ena

affe

ctin

g V

ITA

L A

RE

AS

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

EALs

: (1

or 2

or 3

or 4

or 5

or 6

)

1.

a.

Sei

smic

eve

nt g

reat

er th

an O

pera

ting

Bas

is E

arth

quak

e (O

BE

) as

indi

cate

d by

(site

spe

cific

sei

smic

inst

rum

enta

tion)

read

ing

(site

-sp

ecifi

c O

BE

lim

it).

AN

D

b.

Ear

thqu

ake

conf

irmed

by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g:

� E

arth

quak

e fe

lt in

pla

nt

� N

atio

nal E

arth

quak

e C

ente

r �

Con

trol R

oom

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of s

yste

ms

requ

ired

for t

he s

afe

shut

dow

n of

the

plan

t.

2.

Torn

ado

strik

ing

or h

igh

win

ds g

reat

er th

an (s

ite s

peci

fic m

ph) r

esul

ting

in

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

stru

ctur

es c

onta

inin

g sa

fety

sy

stem

s or

com

pone

nts

OR

con

trol r

oom

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of t

hose

saf

ety

syst

ems:

(site

spe

cific

stru

ctur

e lis

t)

3.

Inte

rnal

floo

ding

in A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

area

s re

sulti

ng in

an

elec

trica

l sh

ock

haza

rd th

at p

recl

udes

acc

ess

to o

pera

te o

r mon

itor s

afet

y eq

uipm

ent O

R c

ontro

l roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se

safe

ty s

yste

ms:

(site

spe

cific

are

a lis

t)

4.

Turb

ine

failu

re-g

ener

ated

PR

OJE

CTI

LES

resu

lting

in V

ISIB

LE D

AMA

GE

to

or p

enet

ratio

n of

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g st

ruct

ures

con

tain

ing

safe

ty

syst

ems

or c

ompo

nent

s O

R c

ontro

l roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s:

(site

spe

cific

stru

ctur

e lis

t)

5.

Veh

icle

cra

sh re

sulti

ng in

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

stru

ctur

es c

onta

inin

g sa

fety

sys

tem

s or

com

pone

nts

OR

con

trol r

oom

in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s:

(site

spe

cific

stru

ctur

e lis

t)

6.

(Site

spe

cific

occ

urre

nces

) res

ultin

g in

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

stru

ctur

es c

onta

inin

g sa

fety

sys

tem

s or

com

pone

nts

OR

con

trol

room

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of t

hose

saf

ety

syst

ems:

(site

spe

cific

stru

ctur

e lis

t)

HA

3 In

itiat

ing

Con

ditio

n:

Nat

ural

or d

estru

ctiv

e ph

enom

ena

affe

ctin

g V

ITA

L A

RE

AS

. O

pera

ting

Mod

e A

pplic

abili

ty: 1

, 2, 3

, 4, 5

, 6, D

EA

Ls:

1.

a.

Sei

smic

eve

nt >

OB

E as

indi

cate

d by

PIC

S s

eism

ic m

onito

ring

syst

em.

AN

D

b.

Ear

thqu

ake

conf

irmed

by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g:

� E

arth

quak

e fe

lt in

pla

nt

� N

atio

nal E

arth

quak

e C

ente

r �

Con

trol R

oom

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of s

yste

ms

requ

ired

for

the

safe

shu

tdow

n of

the

plan

t . O

R

2.

Torn

ado

or h

igh

win

ds >

[45

m/s

ec (1

00 m

ph)]

resu

lting

in E

ITH

ER o

f the

fo

llow

ing:

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

stru

ctur

es in

Tab

le H

-1 a

reas

con

tain

ing

safe

ty

syst

ems

or c

ompo

nent

s.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

OR

3.

In

tern

al fl

oodi

ng in

Tab

le H

-1 a

reas

resu

lting

in E

ITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g:

� E

lect

rical

sho

ck h

azar

d th

at p

recl

udes

acc

ess

to o

pera

te o

r mon

itor s

afet

y eq

uipm

ent.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

OR

4.

[

] 5.

Tu

rbin

e fa

ilure

-gen

erat

ed P

RO

JEC

TILE

S re

sulti

ng in

EIT

HER

of t

he

follo

win

g:

� V

ISIB

LE D

AM

AG

E to

or p

enet

ratio

n of

AN

Y st

ruct

ures

in T

able

H-1

are

as

cont

aini

ng s

afet

y sy

stem

s or

com

pone

nts.

Con

trol R

oom

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of t

hose

saf

ety

syst

ems.

O

R

6.

Veh

icle

cra

sh re

sulti

ng in

EIT

HER

of t

he fo

llow

ing:

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

stru

ctur

es in

Tab

le H

-1 a

reas

con

tain

ing

safe

ty

syst

ems

or c

ompo

nent

s.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

Ls H

A3.

2-6

are

cons

ider

ed

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

HA3

.2 to

rnad

o ‘s

triki

ng’ a

s it

is ir

rele

vant

whe

ther

it s

trike

s or

not

if it

ca

uses

vis

ible

dam

age

to s

truct

ures

con

tain

ing

safe

ty s

yste

ms

or c

ompo

nent

s.

NE

I HA

1.6

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 s

ince

ther

e ar

e no

oth

er s

ite-

spec

ific

occu

rren

ces

that

cou

ld re

sult

in e

ither

: �

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

stru

ctur

es in

Tab

le H

-1 a

reas

con

tain

ing

safe

ty

syst

ems

or c

ompo

nent

s.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Tabl

e

Tabl

e H

-1: S

afe

Shut

dow

n Vi

tal A

reas

Con

trol R

oom

Saf

egua

rds

Bui

ldin

gs

� C

onta

inm

ent

� N

ucle

ar A

uxilia

ry B

uild

ing

� E

mer

genc

y Po

wer

Gen

erat

ing

Bui

ldin

gs

� E

SW

Coo

ling

Tow

ers

Page 21: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 20

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Nat

ural

or d

estru

ctiv

e ph

enom

ena

affe

ctin

g th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

(1 o

r 2 o

r 3 o

r 4 o

r 5)

1.

Sei

smic

eve

nt id

entif

ied

by A

NY

2 of

the

follo

win

g:

� S

eism

ic e

vent

con

firm

ed b

y (s

ite-s

peci

fic in

dica

tion

or m

etho

d)

� E

arth

quak

e fe

lt in

pla

nt

� N

atio

nal E

arth

quak

e C

ente

r

2.

Torn

ado

strik

ing

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

or h

igh

win

ds g

reat

er th

an

(site

-spe

cific

mph

).

3.

Inte

rnal

floo

ding

that

has

the

pote

ntia

l to

affe

ct s

afet

y re

late

d eq

uipm

ent

requ

ired

by T

echn

ical

Spe

cific

atio

ns fo

r the

cur

rent

ope

ratin

g m

ode

in A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

area

s:

(site

spe

cific

are

a lis

t)

4.

Turb

ine

failu

re re

sulti

ng in

cas

ing

pene

tratio

n or

dam

age

to tu

rbin

e or

ge

nera

tor s

eals

5.

(Site

spe

cific

occ

urre

nces

affe

ctin

g P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

).

HU

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Nat

ural

or d

estru

ctiv

e ph

enom

ena

affe

ctin

g th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

a.

Sei

smic

eve

nt tr

igge

r as

indi

cate

d by

PIC

S s

eism

ic m

onito

ring

syst

em.

AN

D

b.

Ear

thqu

ake

conf

irmed

by

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g:

� E

arth

quak

e fe

lt in

pla

nt

� N

atio

nal E

arth

quak

e C

ente

r

OR

2.

a.

Torn

ado

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

OR

b.

Hig

h w

inds

> [4

5 m

/sec

(100

mph

)].

OR

3.

Inte

rnal

floo

ding

in T

able

H-1

are

as th

at h

as th

e po

tent

ial t

o af

fect

saf

ety

rela

ted

equi

pmen

t req

uire

d by

Tec

hnic

al S

peci

ficat

ions

for t

he c

urre

nt

oper

atin

g m

ode.

OR

4.

[ ]

5.

Turb

ine

failu

re re

sulti

ng in

cas

ing

pene

tratio

n or

dam

age

to tu

rbin

e or

ge

nera

tor s

eals

.

Tabl

e H

-1: S

afe

Shut

dow

n Vi

tal A

reas

Con

trol R

oom

Saf

egua

rds

Bui

ldin

gs

� C

onta

inm

ent

� N

ucle

ar A

uxilia

ry B

uild

ing

� E

mer

genc

y Po

wer

Gen

erat

ing

Bui

ldin

gs

� E

SW

Coo

ling

Tow

ers

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

L H

U3.

2 is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Nes

ted

HU

3.1

to m

atch

HA

3.1.

U.S

. EP

R is

cap

able

of m

easu

ring

grou

nd

mot

ion

at th

e U

E le

vel.

Rem

oved

HU

3.2

torn

ado

‘stri

king

’ as

it is

irre

leva

nt w

heth

er it

stri

kes

with

in th

e pr

otec

ted

area

if th

e to

rnad

o its

elf i

s w

ithin

the

prot

ecte

d ar

ea.

NE

I HA

1.6

is N

/A fo

r Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2 s

ince

ther

e ar

e no

oth

er s

ite-

spec

ific

occu

rren

ces

that

cou

ld re

sult

in e

ither

: �

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

stru

ctur

es in

Tab

le H

-1 a

reas

con

tain

ing

safe

ty

syst

ems

or c

ompo

nent

s.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 22: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 21

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HA

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

FIR

E o

r EX

PLO

SIO

N a

ffect

ing

the

oper

abilit

y of

pla

nt s

afet

y sy

stem

s re

quire

d to

est

ablis

h or

mai

ntai

n sa

fe s

hutd

own.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

FIR

E o

r EX

PLO

SIO

N re

sulti

ng in

VIS

IBLE

DA

MA

GE

to A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

stru

ctur

es c

onta

inin

g sa

fety

sys

tem

s or

com

pone

nts

OR

con

trol

room

indi

catio

n of

deg

rade

d pe

rform

ance

of t

hose

saf

ety

syst

ems:

(site

spe

cific

stru

ctur

e lis

t)

HA

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

FIR

E o

r EX

PLO

SIO

N a

ffect

ing

the

oper

abilit

y of

pla

nt s

afet

y sy

stem

s re

quire

d to

est

ablis

h or

mai

ntai

n sa

fe s

hutd

own.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

FIR

E o

r EX

PLO

SIO

N re

sulti

ng in

EIT

HER

of t

he fo

llow

ing:

� V

ISIB

LE D

AM

AG

E to

AN

Y st

ruct

ures

in T

able

H-1

are

as c

onta

inin

g sa

fety

sys

tem

s or

com

pone

nts.

� C

ontro

l Roo

m in

dica

tion

of d

egra

ded

perfo

rman

ce o

f tho

se s

afet

y sy

stem

s.

Tabl

e H

-1: S

afe

Shut

dow

n Vi

tal A

reas

Con

trol R

oom

Saf

egua

rds

Bui

ldin

gs

� C

onta

inm

ent

� N

ucle

ar A

uxilia

ry B

uild

ing

� E

mer

genc

y Po

wer

Gen

erat

ing

Bui

ldin

gs

� E

SW

Coo

ling

Tow

ers

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

L H

A4.

1 is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HU

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

FIR

E w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D A

RE

A n

ot e

xtin

guis

hed

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es o

f de

tect

ion

or E

XP

LOS

ION

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

(1 o

r 2)

Not

e: T

he E

mer

genc

y D

irect

or s

houl

d no

t wai

t unt

il th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e ha

s el

apse

d, b

ut s

houl

d de

clar

e th

e ev

ent a

s so

on a

s it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e du

ratio

n ha

s ex

ceed

ed, o

r will

likel

y ex

ceed

, the

app

licab

le ti

me.

1.

FIR

E n

ot e

xtin

guis

hed

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es o

f con

trol r

oom

not

ifica

tion

or

verif

icat

ion

of a

con

trol r

oom

FIR

E a

larm

in A

NY

of th

e fo

llow

ing

area

s:

(site

spe

cific

are

a lis

t)

2.

EX

PLO

SIO

N w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D A

RE

A.

HU

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

FIR

E w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D A

RE

A n

ot e

xtin

guis

hed

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es o

f de

tect

ion

or E

XP

LOS

ION

with

in th

e P

RO

TEC

TED

AR

EA

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

FIR

E n

ot e

xtin

guis

hed

with

in 1

5 m

inut

es o

f Con

trol R

oom

not

ifica

tion

or

verif

icat

ion

of a

Con

trol R

oom

FIR

E a

larm

in a

ctua

l con

tact

with

or

imm

edia

tely

adj

acen

t to

AN

Y of

the

Tabl

e H

-1 a

reas

.

Tabl

e H

-1: S

afe

Shut

dow

n Vi

tal A

reas

Con

trol R

oom

Saf

egua

rds

Bui

ldin

gs

� C

onta

inm

ent

� N

ucle

ar A

uxilia

ry B

uild

ing

� E

mer

genc

y Po

wer

Gen

erat

ing

Bui

ldin

gs

� E

SW

Coo

ling

Tow

ers

OR

2.

EX

PLO

SIO

N w

ithin

the

PR

OTE

CTE

D A

RE

A.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Add

ed ‘i

n ac

tual

con

tact

with

or i

mm

edia

tely

adj

acen

t to’

from

the

basi

s se

ctio

n to

HU

4.1

to s

uppo

rt th

e us

e of

tabl

e H

-1.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 23: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 22

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HA

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Acc

ess

to a

VIT

AL

AR

EA

is p

rohi

bite

d du

e to

toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant o

r fla

mm

able

gas

es w

hich

jeop

ardi

ze o

pera

tion

of o

pera

ting

equi

pmen

t req

uire

d to

mai

ntai

n sa

fe o

pera

tions

or s

afel

y sh

utdo

wn

the

reac

tor.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

:

Not

e:

If th

e eq

uipm

ent i

n th

e st

ated

are

a w

as a

lread

y in

oper

able

, or o

ut o

f se

rvic

e, b

efor

e th

e ev

ent o

ccur

red,

then

this

EA

L sh

ould

not

be

decl

ared

as

it w

ill ha

ve n

o ad

vers

e im

pact

on

the

abilit

y of

the

plan

t to

safe

ly o

pera

te o

r saf

ely

shut

dow

n be

yond

that

alre

ady

allo

wed

by

Tech

nica

l Spe

cific

atio

ns a

t the

tim

e of

the

even

t.

1.

Acc

ess

to a

VIT

AL

AR

EA

is p

rohi

bite

d du

e to

toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant

or fl

amm

able

gas

es w

hich

jeop

ardi

ze o

pera

tion

of s

yste

ms

requ

ired

to

mai

ntai

n sa

fe o

pera

tions

or s

afel

y sh

utdo

wn

the

reac

tor.

HA

5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Acc

ess

to a

VIT

AL

AR

EA

is p

rohi

bite

d du

e to

toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant o

r fla

mm

able

gas

es, w

hich

jeop

ardi

ze th

e ab

ility

to s

afel

y op

erat

e or

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

Not

e:

If th

e eq

uipm

ent i

n th

e V

ITA

L A

RE

A w

as in

oper

able

or o

ut o

f ser

vice

be

fore

the

even

t occ

urre

d, th

en th

is E

AL

shou

ld n

ot b

e de

clar

ed a

s it

will

have

no

adve

rse

impa

ct o

n th

e ab

ility

to s

afel

y op

erat

e or

sh

utdo

wn

the

plan

t bey

ond

that

allo

wed

by

Tech

nica

l Spe

cific

atio

ns a

t th

e tim

e of

the

even

t.

1.

Acc

ess

to a

VIT

AL

AR

EA

is p

rohi

bite

d du

e to

toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant

or fl

amm

able

gas

es, w

hich

jeop

ardi

ze th

e ab

ility

to s

afel

y op

erat

e or

sh

utdo

wn

the

reac

tor.

Diff

eren

ces

Rew

orde

d IC

, not

e an

d E

AL

for r

eada

bilit

y.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HU

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

– N

OTI

F O

F U

NU

SUA

L EV

ENT

Rel

ease

of t

oxic

, cor

rosi

ve, a

sphy

xian

t or f

lam

mab

le g

ases

dee

med

de

trim

enta

l to

NO

RM

AL

PLA

NT

OP

ER

ATIO

NS

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

Toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant o

r fla

mm

able

gas

es in

am

ount

s th

at h

ave

or

coul

d ad

vers

ely

affe

ct N

OR

MA

L P

LAN

T O

PE

RA

TIO

NS

.

2.

Rep

ort b

y lo

cal,

coun

ty o

r sta

te o

ffici

als

for e

vacu

atio

n or

she

lterin

g of

site

pe

rson

nel b

ased

on

an o

ff-si

te e

vent

.

HU

5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Rel

ease

of t

oxic

, cor

rosi

ve, a

sphy

xian

t or f

lam

mab

le g

ases

dee

med

de

trim

enta

l to

NO

RM

AL

PLA

NT

OP

ER

ATIO

NS

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Toxi

c, c

orro

sive

, asp

hyxi

ant o

r fla

mm

able

gas

es in

am

ount

s th

at h

ave

or

coul

d ad

vers

ely

affe

ct N

OR

MA

L P

LAN

T O

PE

RA

TIO

NS

.

OR

2.

Rep

ort b

y lo

cal,

coun

ty o

r sta

te o

ffici

als

for e

vacu

atio

n or

she

lterin

g of

site

pe

rson

nel b

ased

on

an o

ffsite

eve

nt.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HG

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

a G

ener

al E

mer

genc

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

in

dica

te th

at e

vent

s ar

e in

pro

gres

s or

hav

e oc

curre

d w

hich

invo

lve

actu

al

or IM

MIN

EN

T su

bsta

ntia

l cor

e de

grad

atio

n or

mel

ting

with

pot

entia

l for

lo

ss o

f con

tain

men

t int

egrit

y or

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

that

resu

lts in

an

actu

al

loss

of p

hysi

cal c

ontro

l of t

he fa

cilit

y. R

elea

ses

can

be re

ason

ably

ex

pect

ed to

exc

eed

EP

A P

rote

ctiv

e A

ctio

n G

uide

line

expo

sure

leve

ls o

ff-si

te fo

r mor

e th

an th

e im

med

iate

site

are

a.

HG

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

Gen

eral

Em

erge

ncy.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

indi

cate

that

eve

nts

are

in p

rogr

ess

or h

ave

occu

rred

whi

ch

invo

lve

actu

al o

r im

min

ent s

ubst

antia

l cor

e de

grad

atio

n or

mel

ting

with

po

tent

ial f

or lo

ss o

f con

tain

men

t int

egrit

y or

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

that

resu

lts

in a

n ac

tual

loss

of p

hysi

cal c

ontro

l of t

he fa

cilit

y. R

elea

ses

can

be

reas

onab

ly e

xpec

ted

to e

xcee

d E

PA

Pro

tect

ive

Act

ion

Gui

delin

e ex

posu

re

leve

ls o

ffsite

for m

ore

than

the

imm

edia

te s

ite a

rea.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 24: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 23

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

HS3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

a S

ite A

rea

Em

erge

ncy.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

in

dica

te th

at e

vent

s ar

e in

pro

gres

s or

hav

e oc

curre

d w

hich

invo

lve

actu

al

or li

kely

maj

or fa

ilure

s of

pla

nt fu

nctio

ns n

eede

d fo

r pro

tect

ion

of th

e pu

blic

or

HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

that

resu

lts in

inte

ntio

nal d

amag

e or

mal

icio

us a

cts;

(1

) tow

ard

site

per

sonn

el o

r equ

ipm

ent t

hat c

ould

lead

to th

e lik

ely

failu

re

of o

r; (2

) tha

t pre

vent

effe

ctiv

e ac

cess

to e

quip

men

t nee

ded

for t

he

prot

ectio

n of

the

publ

ic. A

ny re

leas

es a

re n

ot e

xpec

ted

to re

sult

in

expo

sure

leve

ls w

hich

exc

eed

EP

A P

rote

ctiv

e A

ctio

n G

uide

line

expo

sure

le

vels

bey

ond

the

site

bou

ndar

y.

HS6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

Site

Are

a E

mer

genc

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

indi

cate

that

eve

nts

are

in p

rogr

ess

or h

ave

occu

rred

whi

ch

invo

lve

actu

al o

r lik

ely

maj

or fa

ilure

s of

pla

nt fu

nctio

ns n

eede

d fo

r pr

otec

tion

of th

e pu

blic

or H

OS

TILE

AC

TIO

N th

at re

sults

in in

tent

iona

l da

mag

e or

mal

icio

us a

cts;

(1) t

owar

d si

te p

erso

nnel

or e

quip

men

t tha

t co

uld

lead

to th

e lik

ely

failu

re o

f or,

(2) t

hat p

reve

nt e

ffect

ive

acce

ss to

eq

uipm

ent n

eede

d fo

r the

pro

tect

ion

of th

e pu

blic

. Any

rele

ases

are

not

ex

pect

ed to

resu

lt in

exp

osur

e le

vels

, whi

ch e

xcee

d EP

A P

rote

ctiv

e A

ctio

n G

uide

line

expo

sure

leve

ls b

eyon

d th

e si

te b

ound

ary.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HA

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

an

Aler

t.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

in

dica

te th

at e

vent

s ar

e in

pro

gres

s or

hav

e oc

curre

d w

hich

invo

lve

actu

al

or p

oten

tial s

ubst

antia

l deg

rada

tion

of th

e le

vel o

f saf

ety

of th

e pl

ant o

r a

secu

rity

even

t tha

t inv

olve

s pr

obab

le li

fe th

reat

enin

g ris

k to

site

per

sonn

el

or d

amag

e to

site

equ

ipm

ent b

ecau

se o

f HO

STI

LE A

CTI

ON

. Any

rele

ases

ar

e ex

pect

ed to

be

limite

d to

sm

all f

ract

ions

of t

he E

PA

Pro

tect

ive

Act

ion

Gui

delin

e ex

posu

re le

vels

.

HA

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

an

Aler

t.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

indi

cate

that

eve

nts

are

in p

rogr

ess

or h

ave

occu

rred

whi

ch

invo

lve

actu

al o

r pot

entia

l sub

stan

tial d

egra

datio

n of

the

leve

l of s

afet

y of

th

e pl

ant o

r a s

ecur

ity e

vent

that

invo

lves

pro

babl

e lif

e th

reat

enin

g ris

k to

si

te p

erso

nnel

or d

amag

e to

site

equ

ipm

ent b

ecau

se o

f HO

STI

LE

AC

TIO

N. A

ny re

leas

es a

re e

xpec

ted

to b

e lim

ited

to s

mal

l fra

ctio

ns o

f the

E

PA

Pro

tect

ive

Act

ion

Gui

delin

e ex

posu

re le

vels

.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

HU

5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

– N

OTI

F O

F U

NU

SUA

L EV

ENT

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

a N

OU

E.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: All

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

in

dica

te th

at e

vent

s ar

e in

pro

gres

s or

hav

e oc

curre

d w

hich

indi

cate

a

pote

ntia

l deg

rada

tion

of th

e le

vel o

f saf

ety

of th

e pl

ant o

r ind

icat

e a

secu

rity

thre

at to

faci

lity

prot

ectio

n ha

s be

en in

itiat

ed. N

o re

leas

es o

f rad

ioac

tive

mat

eria

l req

uirin

g of

f-site

resp

onse

or m

onito

ring

are

expe

cted

unl

ess

furth

er d

egra

datio

n of

saf

ety

syst

ems

occu

rs.

HU

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

w

arra

nt d

ecla

ratio

n of

an

Unu

sual

Eve

nt.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

, 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Oth

er c

ondi

tions

exi

st w

hich

in th

e ju

dgm

ent o

f the

Em

erge

ncy

Coo

rdin

ator

indi

cate

that

eve

nts

are

in p

rogr

ess

or h

ave

occu

rred

whi

ch

indi

cate

a p

oten

tial d

egra

datio

n of

the

leve

l of s

afet

y of

the

plan

t or

indi

cate

a s

ecur

ity th

reat

to fa

cilit

y pr

otec

tion

has

been

initi

ated

. No

rele

ases

of r

adio

activ

e m

ater

ial r

equi

ring

offs

ite re

spon

se o

r mon

itorin

g ar

e ex

pect

ed u

nles

s fu

rther

deg

rada

tion

of s

afet

y sy

stem

s oc

curs

.

Diff

eren

ces

Cha

nge

to th

e si

te-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y po

sitio

n tit

le is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 25: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 24

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

Syst

em M

alfu

nctio

ns -

Hot

SG

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Pro

long

ed lo

ss o

f all

Off-

site

and

all

On-

Site

AC

pow

er to

em

erge

ncy

buss

es.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

a.

Loss

of a

ll of

f-site

and

on-

site

AC

pow

er to

(site

spe

cific

em

erge

ncy

buss

es).

AN

D

b.

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g:

� R

esto

ratio

n of

at l

east

one

em

erge

ncy

bus

in le

ss th

an (s

ite s

peci

fic

hour

s) is

not

like

ly.

� (S

ite s

peci

fic In

dica

tion

of c

ontin

uing

deg

rada

tion

of c

ore

cool

ing

base

d on

Fis

sion

Pro

duct

Bar

rier m

onito

ring.

)

SG1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Pro

long

ed lo

ss o

f all

offs

ite a

nd a

ll on

site

AC

pow

er to

em

erge

ncy

buss

es.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

a.

Loss

of A

LL o

ffsite

and

ALL

ons

ite A

C p

ower

to 3

1, 3

2, 3

3 an

d 34

B

DA

bus

ses.

AN

D

b.

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g:

� R

esto

ratio

n of

at l

east

one

em

erge

ncy

bus

with

in 2

hou

rs is

not

lik

ely.

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

4].

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Loss

of a

ll O

ff-si

te a

nd a

ll O

n-S

ite A

C p

ower

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

Loss

of a

ll O

ff-S

ite a

nd a

ll O

n-S

ite A

C p

ower

to (s

ite s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

) for

15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

SS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll of

fsite

and

all

onsi

te A

C p

ower

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

for 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of A

LL o

ffsite

and

ALL

ons

ite A

C p

ower

to 3

1, 3

2, 3

3 an

d 34

BD

A

buss

es fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SA5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

redu

ced

to a

sin

gle

pow

er s

ourc

e fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r suc

h th

at a

ny a

dditi

onal

sin

gle

failu

re w

ould

resu

lt in

st

atio

n bl

acko

ut.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

a.

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to (s

ite-s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

) red

uced

to a

si

ngle

pow

er s

ourc

e fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

AN

D

b.

Any

add

ition

al s

ingl

e fa

ilure

will

resu

lt in

sta

tion

blac

kout

.

SA1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

redu

ced

to a

sin

gle

sour

ce fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r suc

h th

at a

ny a

dditi

onal

sin

gle

failu

re w

ould

resu

lt in

a lo

ss

of a

ll A

C p

ower

to th

e em

erge

ncy

buss

es.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

a.

AC

pow

er to

31,

32,

33

and

34 B

DA

bus

ses

is re

duce

d to

a s

ingl

e so

urce

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

AN

D

b.

Any

add

ition

al s

ingl

e fa

ilure

will

resu

lt in

a lo

ss o

f all

AC

pow

er to

31,

32

, 33

and

34 B

DA

bus

ses.

Diff

eren

ces

Rep

lace

d st

atio

n bl

acko

ut w

ith a

loss

of a

ll A

C to

em

erge

ncy

buss

es. T

he

addi

tiona

l los

s to

em

erge

ncy

bus

may

not

resu

lt in

a s

tatio

n bl

acko

ut o

n U

.S.

EP

R if

pow

er is

bei

ng b

ackf

ed to

non

-vita

l bus

ses.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 26: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 25

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

SU1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Loss

of a

ll O

ff-si

te A

C p

ower

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

Loss

of a

ll of

f-site

AC

pow

er to

(site

spe

cific

em

erge

ncy

buss

es) f

or 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

SU1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll of

fsite

AC

pow

er to

em

erge

ncy

buss

es fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of A

LL o

ffsite

AC

pow

er to

31,

32,

33

and

34 B

DA

bus

ses

for

15 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SS3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Loss

of a

ll vi

tal D

C p

ower

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

Less

than

(site

spe

cific

bus

vol

tage

indi

catio

n) o

n al

l (si

te s

peci

fic V

ital D

C

buss

es) f

or 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

SS2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of r

equi

red

DC

pow

er fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

< 21

0 VD

C o

n th

e re

quire

d 31

, 32,

33

and

34 B

UC

bus

ses

for 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SG2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Aut

omat

ic S

cram

(Trip

) and

all

man

ual a

ctio

ns fa

il to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r and

in

dica

tion

of a

n ex

trem

e ch

alle

nge

to th

e ab

ility

to c

ool t

he c

ore

exis

ts.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic s

cram

(trip

) fai

led

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor.

AN

D

b.

All

man

ual a

ctio

ns d

o no

t shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

(site

sp

ecifi

c in

dica

tions

of r

eact

or n

ot s

hutd

own)

.

AN

D

c.

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g ex

ist o

r hav

e oc

curre

d du

e to

con

tinue

d po

wer

gen

erat

ion:

� (S

ite s

peci

fic in

dica

tion

that

cor

e co

olin

g is

ext

rem

ely

chal

leng

ed.)

� (S

ite s

peci

fic in

dica

tion

that

hea

t rem

oval

is e

xtre

mel

y ch

alle

nged

.)

SG3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Aut

omat

ic tr

ip a

nd a

ll m

anua

l act

ions

faile

d to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r and

in

dica

tion

of a

n ex

trem

e ch

alle

nge

to th

e ab

ility

to c

ool t

he c

ore

exis

ts.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

EALs

:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic re

acto

r trip

faile

d to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

re

acto

r pow

er >

5%

.

AN

D

b.

All

man

ual a

ctio

ns fa

iled

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor a

s in

dica

ted

by

reac

tor p

ower

> 5

%.

AN

D

c.

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g ha

ve o

ccur

red:

[Cal

cula

ted

Cla

d Te

mpe

ratu

re in

Reg

ion

3 or

hig

her].

Loss

of a

ll fo

ur tr

ains

of E

mer

genc

y Fe

edw

ater

.

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed re

acto

r pow

er th

resh

old

to S

G3.

1.a

to p

rovi

de c

onsi

sten

t wor

ding

th

roug

hout

the

esca

latio

n pa

thw

ay.

Rew

orde

d SG

3.1.

b fro

m ‘d

o no

t shu

tdow

n’ to

‘fai

led

to s

hutd

own’

to m

atch

IC

and

SG

3.1.

a w

ordi

ng (h

uman

fact

ors)

. Thi

s do

es n

ot c

hang

e th

e m

eani

ng o

r in

tent

.

Rem

oved

the

SG

3.1.

c w

ords

‘exi

st o

r’ fo

r hum

an fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(m

inim

ize

extra

neou

s w

ords

).

Rem

oved

the

SG

3.1.

c w

ords

‘due

to c

ontin

ued

pow

er g

ener

atio

n’ s

ince

co

ntin

ued

pow

er g

ener

atio

n w

ill no

t cau

se a

loss

of a

ll fo

ur E

FW tr

ains

.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 27: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 26

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

SS2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Aut

omat

ic S

cram

(Trip

) fai

ls to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r and

man

ual a

ctio

ns ta

ken

from

the

reac

tor c

ontro

l con

sole

are

not

suc

cess

ful i

n sh

uttin

g do

wn

the

reac

tor.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic s

cram

(trip

) fai

led

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor.

AN

D

b.

Man

ual a

ctio

ns ta

ken

at th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le d

o no

t shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

(site

spe

cific

indi

catio

ns o

f rea

ctor

not

sh

utdo

wn)

.

SS3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Aut

omat

ic tr

ip fa

iled

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor a

nd m

anua

l act

ions

take

n fro

m

the

reac

tor c

ontro

l con

sole

faile

d to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

EALs

:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic re

acto

r trip

faile

d to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

re

acto

r pow

er >

5%

.

AN

D

b.

Man

ual a

ctio

ns ta

ken

at th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le fa

iled

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor a

s in

dica

ted

by re

acto

r pow

er >

5%

.

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed re

acto

r pow

er th

resh

old

to S

S3.

1.a

to p

rovi

de c

onsi

sten

t wor

ding

th

roug

hout

the

esca

latio

n pa

thw

ay.

Rew

orde

d IC

and

SS

3.1.

b fro

m ‘d

o no

t shu

tdow

n’ to

‘fai

led

to s

hutd

own’

to

mat

ch S

G3

IC a

nd S

S3.

1.a

wor

ding

(hum

an fa

ctor

s). T

his

does

not

cha

nge

the

mea

ning

or i

nten

t.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SA2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Aut

omat

ic S

cram

(Trip

) fai

ls to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r and

the

man

ual a

ctio

ns

take

n fro

m th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le a

re s

ucce

ssfu

l in

shut

ting

dow

n th

e re

acto

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic s

cram

(trip

) fai

led

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor.

AN

D

b.

Man

ual a

ctio

ns ta

ken

at th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le s

ucce

ssfu

lly

shut

dow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

(site

spe

cific

indi

catio

ns o

f pla

nt

shut

dow

n).

SA3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Aut

omat

ic tr

ip fa

iled

to s

hutd

own

the

reac

tor a

nd th

e m

anua

l act

ions

take

n fro

m th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le a

re s

ucce

ssfu

l in

shut

ting

dow

n th

e re

acto

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

EALs

:

1.

a.

An

auto

mat

ic re

acto

r trip

faile

d to

shu

tdow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

re

acto

r pow

er >

5%

.

AN

D

b.

Man

ual a

ctio

ns ta

ken

at th

e re

acto

r con

trol c

onso

le s

ucce

ssfu

lly

shut

dow

n th

e re

acto

r as

indi

cate

d by

reac

tor p

ower

< 5

%.

Diff

eren

ces

Add

ed re

acto

r pow

er th

resh

old

to S

A3.

1.a

to p

rovi

de c

onsi

sten

t wor

ding

th

roug

hout

the

esca

latio

n pa

thw

ay.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SU8

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Inad

verte

nt C

ritic

ality

.

OPE

RA

TIN

G M

OD

E A

PPLI

CA

BIL

ITY:

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

Shu

tdow

n

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve p

erio

d ob

serv

ed o

n nu

clea

r in

stru

men

tatio

n. [B

WR

]

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve s

tartu

p ra

te o

bser

ved

on n

ucle

ar

inst

rum

enta

tion.

[PW

R]

SU3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Inad

verte

nt c

ritic

ality

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve s

tartu

p ra

te o

bser

ved

on n

ucle

ar

inst

rum

enta

tion.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 28: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 27

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

SS6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Inab

ility

to m

onito

r a S

IGN

IFIC

AN

T TR

AN

SIE

NT

in p

rogr

ess.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

a.

Loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% o

f the

follo

win

g fo

r 15

min

utes

or

long

er:

� (S

ite s

peci

fic c

ontro

l roo

m s

afet

y sy

stem

ann

unci

atio

n)

OR

� (S

ite s

peci

fic c

ontro

l roo

m s

afet

y sy

stem

indi

catio

n)

AN

D

b.

A S

IGN

IFIC

AN

T TR

ANS

IEN

T is

in p

rogr

ess.

AN

D

c.

Com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tions

are

una

vaila

ble.

SS4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll m

onito

ring

func

tions

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger w

ith a

SIG

NIF

ICA

NT

TRA

NS

IEN

T in

pro

gres

s.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

a.

Loss

of S

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of P

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

AN

D

c.

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g S

IGN

IFIC

AN

T TR

ANS

IEN

TS a

re in

pro

gres

s:

� A

utom

atic

runb

ack

> 50

% th

erm

al p

ower

� E

lect

rical

load

reje

ctio

n >

50%

full

elec

trica

l loa

d

� R

eact

or tr

ip

� M

HS

I act

uatio

n

Diff

eren

ces

Rew

orde

d IC

to re

flect

EA

L co

nditi

ons

and

prov

ide

logi

cal i

ntui

tive

prog

ress

ion

path

way

.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns (D

evia

tion

#2)

Loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% re

mov

ed to

acc

ount

for U

.S. E

PR

di

gita

l mon

itorin

g sy

stem

des

ign.

Com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tion

crite

rion

was

rem

oved

. Com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tion

is

not a

pplic

able

U.S

. EP

R.

SA4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

UN

PLA

NN

ED

Los

s of

saf

ety

syst

em a

nnun

ciat

ion

or in

dica

tion

in th

e C

ontro

l R

oom

with

EIT

HE

R (1

) a S

IGN

IFIC

AN

T TR

AN

SIE

NT

in p

rogr

ess,

or (

2)

com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tors

una

vaila

ble.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

a.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% o

f the

follo

win

g fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r:

� (S

ite s

peci

fic c

ontro

l roo

m s

afet

y sy

stem

ann

unci

atio

n)

� (S

ite s

peci

fic c

ontro

l roo

m s

afet

y sy

stem

indi

catio

n)

b.

EITH

ER o

f the

follo

win

g:

� A

SIG

NIF

ICA

NT

TRAN

SIE

NT

is in

pro

gres

s.

� C

ompe

nsat

ory

indi

catio

ns a

re u

nava

ilabl

e.

SA4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll m

onito

ring

func

tions

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

a.

Loss

of S

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of P

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Diff

eren

ces

Rew

orde

d IC

to re

flect

EA

L co

nditi

ons

and

prov

ide

logi

cal i

ntui

tive

prog

ress

ion

path

way

.

Rem

oved

the

unpl

anne

d re

stric

tion

from

the

IC a

nd E

AL s

ince

U.S

. EP

R

oper

atio

ns d

o no

t allo

w fo

r the

rem

oval

of S

ICS

or P

ICS

whi

le in

the

hot

mod

es.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns (D

evia

tion

#2)

Loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% re

mov

ed to

acc

ount

for U

.S. E

PR

di

gita

l mon

itorin

g sy

stem

des

ign.

Com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tion

crite

rion

was

rem

oved

. Com

pens

ator

y in

dica

tion

is

not a

pplic

able

U.S

. EP

R.

Rem

oved

sig

nific

ant t

rans

ient

to p

rovi

de p

rogr

essi

on to

SA

E E

AL.

Page 29: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 28

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

SU3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of s

afet

y sy

stem

ann

unci

atio

n or

indi

catio

n in

the

cont

rol

room

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on h

as e

xcee

ded,

or w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed, t

he a

pplic

able

tim

e.

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% o

f the

follo

win

g fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r:

a.

(Site

spe

cific

con

trol r

oom

saf

ety

syst

em a

nnun

ciat

ion)

OR

b.

(Site

spe

cific

con

trol r

oom

saf

ety

syst

em in

dica

tion)

SU4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Deg

rada

tion

of m

onito

ring

func

tions

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of S

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

OR

2.

Loss

of P

ICS

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Diff

eren

ces

Rew

orde

d IC

to re

flect

EA

L co

nditi

ons

and

prov

ide

logi

cal i

ntui

tive

prog

ress

ion

path

way

.

Rem

oved

the

unpl

anne

d re

stric

tion

from

the

IC a

nd E

AL s

ince

U.S

. EP

R

oper

atio

ns d

o no

t allo

w fo

r the

rem

oval

of S

ICS

or P

ICS

whi

le in

the

hot

mod

es.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns (D

evia

tion

#2)

Loss

of g

reat

er th

an a

ppro

xim

atel

y 75

% re

mov

ed to

acc

ount

for U

.S. E

PR

di

gita

l mon

itorin

g sy

stem

des

ign.

SU2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Inab

ility

to re

ach

requ

ired

shut

dow

n w

ithin

Tec

hnic

al S

peci

ficat

ion

limits

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

1.

Pla

nt is

not

bro

ught

to re

quire

d op

erat

ing

mod

e w

ithin

Tec

hnic

al

Spe

cific

atio

ns L

CO

Act

ion

Sta

tem

ent T

ime.

SU5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Inab

ility

to re

ach

requ

ired

oper

atin

g m

ode

with

in T

echn

ical

Spe

cific

atio

n lim

its.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Pla

nt is

not

bro

ught

to re

quire

d op

erat

ing

mod

e w

ithin

Tec

hnic

al

Spe

cific

atio

ns L

CO

act

ion

com

plet

ion

time.

Diff

eren

ces

Rep

lace

d ‘s

hutd

own’

with

‘ope

ratin

g m

ode’

in th

e IC

to m

ore

accu

rate

ly re

flect

th

e E

AL

wor

ding

and

the

inte

nt o

f the

bas

es.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SU6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Loss

of a

ll O

n-si

te o

r Off-

site

com

mun

icat

ions

cap

abilit

ies.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

Loss

of a

ll of

the

follo

win

g on

-site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm ro

utin

e op

erat

ions

.

(site

spe

cific

list

of c

omm

unic

atio

ns m

etho

ds)

2.

Loss

of a

ll of

the

follo

win

g of

f-site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm o

ffsite

not

ifica

tions

.

(site

spe

cific

list

of c

omm

unic

atio

ns m

etho

ds)

SU6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll on

site

or o

ffsite

com

mun

icat

ions

cap

abili

ties.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of A

LL o

f the

follo

win

g on

site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm ro

utin

e op

erat

ions

: �

Rad

ios

� P

lant

Pag

e �

Inte

rnal

Tel

epho

ne S

yste

ms

OR

2.

Loss

of A

LL o

f the

follo

win

g of

fsite

com

mun

icat

ions

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm o

ffsite

not

ifica

tions

: �

SE

NTR

Y �

NR

C E

mer

genc

y N

otifi

catio

n S

yste

m -

EN

S

� N

RC

Hea

lth P

hysi

cs N

etw

ork

- HPN

Ext

erna

l Tel

epho

ne S

yste

ms

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 30: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 29

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

SU5

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

RC

S le

akag

e.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

Uni

dent

ified

or p

ress

ure

boun

dary

leak

age

grea

ter t

han

10 g

pm.

2.

Iden

tifie

d le

akag

e gr

eate

r tha

n 25

gpm

.

SU7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

RC

S le

akag

e.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Uni

dent

ified

or p

ress

ure

boun

dary

leak

age

> 10

gpm

.

OR

2.

Iden

tifie

d le

akag

e >

25 g

pm.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

SU4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Fuel

Cla

d de

grad

atio

n.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Pow

er O

pera

tion,

Sta

rtup,

Hot

Sta

ndby

, Hot

S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

(Site

spe

cific

radi

atio

n m

onito

r rea

ding

s in

dica

ting

fuel

cla

d de

grad

atio

n gr

eate

r tha

n Te

chni

cal S

peci

ficat

ion

allo

wab

le li

mits

.)

2.

(Site

spe

cific

coo

lant

sam

ple

activ

ity v

alue

indi

catin

g fu

el c

lad

degr

adat

ion

grea

ter t

han

Tech

nica

l Spe

cific

atio

n al

low

able

lim

its.)

SU9

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Fuel

cla

d de

grad

atio

n.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 1, 2

, 3, 4

EALs

:

1.

Gro

ss F

aile

d Fu

el M

onito

r ([K

UA

66 C

R00

1]) >

[SU

9.1]

cpm

.

OR

2.

Coo

lant

sam

ple

activ

ity >

1.0

�C

i/gm

dos

e eq

uiva

lent

I-13

1.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Syst

em M

alfu

nctio

ns -

Col

d

C

A3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Loss

of a

ll O

ff-si

te a

nd a

ll O

n-S

ite A

C p

ower

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g, D

efue

led

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

Loss

of a

ll O

ff-S

ite a

nd O

n-S

ite A

C P

ower

to (s

ite s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

) for

15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

CA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll of

fsite

and

all

onsi

te A

C p

ower

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

for 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of A

LL o

ffsite

and

ALL

ons

ite A

C p

ower

to 3

1, 3

2, 3

3 an

d 34

BD

A

buss

es fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 31: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 30

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CU

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

redu

ced

to a

sin

gle

pow

er s

ourc

e fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r suc

h th

at a

ny a

dditi

onal

sin

gle

failu

re w

ould

resu

lt in

st

atio

n bl

acko

ut

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

a.

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to (s

ite s

peci

fic e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

) red

uced

to a

si

ngle

pow

er s

ourc

e fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

AN

D

b.

Any

add

ition

al s

ingl

e po

wer

sou

rce

failu

re w

ill re

sult

in s

tatio

n bl

acko

ut.

CU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

AC

pow

er c

apab

ility

to e

mer

genc

y bu

sses

redu

ced

to a

sin

gle

sour

ce fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r suc

h th

at a

ny a

dditi

onal

sin

gle

failu

re w

ould

resu

lt in

a lo

ss

of a

ll A

C p

ower

to th

e em

erge

ncy

buss

es.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

a.

AC

pow

er to

31,

32,

33

and

34 B

DA

bus

ses

is re

duce

d to

a s

ingl

e so

urce

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

AN

D

b.

Any

add

ition

al s

ingl

e fa

ilure

will

resu

lt in

a lo

ss o

f all

AC

pow

er to

31,

32

, 33

and

34 B

DA

bus

ses.

Diff

eren

ces

Rep

lace

d st

atio

n bl

acko

ut w

ith a

loss

of a

ll A

C to

em

erge

ncy

buss

es. T

he

addi

tiona

l los

s to

em

erge

ncy

bus

may

not

resu

lt in

a s

tatio

n bl

acko

ut o

n U

.S.

EP

R if

pow

er is

bei

ng b

ackf

ed to

non

-vita

l bus

ses.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

CU

7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Loss

of r

equi

red

DC

pow

er fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

Less

than

(site

spe

cific

bus

vol

tage

indi

catio

n) o

n re

quire

d (s

ite s

peci

fic

Vita

l DC

bus

ses)

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger.

CU

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of r

equi

red

DC

pow

er fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

< 21

0 VD

C o

n th

e re

quire

d 31

, 32,

33

and

34 B

UC

bus

ses

for 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

CU

8

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Inad

verte

nt c

ritic

ality

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

:

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve p

erio

d ob

serv

ed o

n nu

clea

r in

stru

men

tatio

n. (B

WR

)

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve s

tartu

p ra

te o

bser

ved

on n

ucle

ar

inst

rum

enta

tion.

(PW

R)

CU

3

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Inad

verte

nt c

ritic

ality

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

sus

tain

ed p

ositi

ve s

tartu

p ra

te o

bser

ved

on n

ucle

ar

inst

rum

enta

tion.

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 32: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 31

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CU

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

Loss

of a

ll O

n-si

te o

r Off-

site

com

mun

icat

ions

cap

abilit

ies.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g, D

efue

led

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

1.

Loss

of a

ll of

the

follo

win

g on

-site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm ro

utin

e op

erat

ions

.

(site

spe

cific

list

of c

omm

unic

atio

ns m

etho

ds)

2.

Loss

of a

ll of

the

follo

win

g of

f-site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm o

ffsite

not

ifica

tions

.

(site

spe

cific

list

of c

omm

unic

atio

ns m

etho

ds)

CU

6

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of a

ll on

site

or o

ffsite

com

mun

icat

ions

cap

abili

ties.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

, D

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of A

LL o

f the

follo

win

g on

site

com

mun

icat

ion

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm ro

utin

e op

erat

ions

: �

Rad

ios

� P

lant

Pag

e �

Inte

rnal

Tel

epho

ne S

yste

ms

OR

2.

Loss

of A

LL o

f the

follo

win

g of

fsite

com

mun

icat

ions

met

hods

affe

ctin

g th

e ab

ility

to p

erfo

rm o

ffsite

not

ifica

tions

: �

SE

NTR

Y �

NR

C E

mer

genc

y N

otifi

catio

n S

yste

m -

EN

S

� N

RC

Hea

lth P

hysi

cs N

etw

ork

- HPN

Ext

erna

l Tel

epho

ne S

yste

ms

Diff

eren

ces

Non

e

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 33: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 32

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CG

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- GEN

ERA

L EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Loss

of R

CS

/RP

V in

vent

ory

affe

ctin

g fu

el c

lad

inte

grity

with

con

tain

men

t ch

alle

nged

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vel:

(1 o

r 2)

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

a.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l les

s th

an (s

ite s

peci

fic le

vel f

or T

OAF

) for

30

min

utes

or

long

er.

AN

D

b.

AN

Y co

ntai

nmen

t cha

lleng

e in

dica

tion

(see

Tab

le):

2.

a.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l can

not b

e m

onito

red

with

cor

e un

cove

ry in

dica

ted

by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g fo

r 30

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

� (S

ite s

peci

fic ra

diat

ion

mon

itor)

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

(site

spe

cific

se

tpoi

nt).

� E

rrat

ic s

ourc

e ra

nge

mon

itor i

ndic

atio

n.

� U

NP

LAN

NE

D le

vel r

ise

in (s

ite s

peci

fic s

ump

or ta

nk).

� [O

ther

site

spe

cific

indi

catio

ns]

AN

D

b.

AN

Y co

ntai

nmen

t cha

lleng

e in

dica

tion

(see

Tab

le):

Tabl

e: C

onta

inm

ent C

halle

nge

Indi

catio

ns

� C

ON

TAIN

MEN

T C

LOS

UR

E n

ot e

stab

lishe

d.

� (S

ite s

peci

fic e

xplo

sive

mix

ture

) ins

ide

cont

ainm

ent.

� U

NP

LAN

NE

D ri

se in

con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e.

� S

econ

dary

con

tain

men

t rad

iatio

n m

onito

r rea

ding

ab

ove

(site

spe

cific

val

ue).

[BW

R o

nly]

CG

7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y af

fect

ing

fuel

cla

d in

tegr

ity w

ith c

onta

inm

ent c

halle

nged

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

a.

RP

V le

vel <

[96.

0 fe

et (2

9.3

met

ers)

] (to

p of

act

ive

fuel

) for

30

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

AN

D

b.

AN

Y Ta

ble

C-1

con

tain

men

t cha

lleng

e in

dica

tions

.

OR

2.

a.

RP

V le

vel c

anno

t be

mon

itore

d w

ith c

ore

unco

very

indi

cate

d by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g fo

r 30

min

utes

or l

onge

r:

� R

eact

or B

uild

ing

Ref

uelin

g B

ridge

Are

a D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

15 C

R00

3]) >

[CG

7.2.

a(b1

)] m

R/h

r.

� E

rrat

ic s

ourc

e ra

nge

mon

itor i

ndic

atio

n.

� U

NP

LAN

NE

D le

vel r

ise

in IR

WS

T.

AN

D

b.

AN

Y Ta

ble

C-1

con

tain

men

t cha

lleng

e in

dica

tions

.

Tabl

e C

-1: C

onta

inm

ent C

halle

nge

Indi

catio

ns

� C

ON

TAIN

MEN

T C

LOS

UR

E n

ot e

stab

lishe

d.

� H

ydro

gen

conc

entra

tion

> 4%

insi

de c

onta

inm

ent.

� U

NP

LAN

NE

D ri

se in

con

tain

men

t pre

ssur

e.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

L C

G7.

2.a

is c

onsi

dere

d ad

min

istra

tive.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ C

G7.

2.a

bulle

t 1 (N

EI C

G1.

2.a

bulle

t 1) f

or h

uman

fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 34: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 33

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CS1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- SIT

E A

REA

EM

ERG

ENC

Y

Loss

of R

CS

/RP

V in

vent

ory

affe

ctin

g co

re d

ecay

hea

t rem

oval

cap

abilit

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

or 3

)

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

With

CO

NTA

INM

EN

T C

LOS

UR

E n

ot e

stab

lishe

d, R

CS

/RP

V le

vel l

ess

than

(site

spe

cific

leve

l).

[6" b

elow

the

botto

m ID

of t

he R

CS

loop

) (P

WR

)]

[6" b

elow

the

low

-low

EC

CS

act

uatio

n se

tpoi

nt) (

BWR

)]

OR

2.

With

CO

NTA

INM

EN

T C

LOS

UR

E e

stab

lishe

d, R

CS

/RP

V le

vel l

ess

than

(s

ite s

peci

fic le

vel f

or T

OAF

).

OR

3.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l can

not b

e m

onito

red

for 3

0 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger w

ith a

loss

of

RC

S/R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g:

� (S

ite s

peci

fic ra

diat

ion

mon

itor)

read

ing

grea

ter t

han

(site

spe

cific

va

lue)

.

� E

rratic

Sou

rce

Ran

ge M

onito

r Ind

icat

ion.

� U

nexp

lain

ed le

vel r

ise

in (s

ite s

peci

fic s

ump

or ta

nk).

CS7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y af

fect

ing

core

dec

ay h

eat r

emov

al c

apab

ility.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

a.

CO

NTA

INM

ENT

CLO

SU

RE

not

est

ablis

hed.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

RC

S le

vel (

[JEF

10 C

L081

]) <

[CS7

.1.b

].

OR

2.

a.

CO

NTA

INM

ENT

CLO

SU

RE

est

ablis

hed.

AN

D

b.

RP

V le

vel <

[96.

0 fe

et (2

9.3

met

ers)

] (to

p of

act

ive

fuel

).

OR

3.

a.

RC

S le

vel c

anno

t be

mon

itore

d fo

r 30

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

AN

Y of

the

follo

win

g:

� R

eact

or B

uild

ing

Ref

uelin

g B

ridge

Are

a D

ose

Rat

e M

onito

r ([J

YK

15 C

R00

3]) >

[CS7

.3.b

(b1)

] mR

/hr.

� E

rrat

ic s

ourc

e ra

nge

mon

itor i

ndic

atio

n.

� U

NP

LAN

NE

D le

vel r

ise

in IR

WS

T.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

Ls C

S7.

1, C

S7.

2 an

d C

S7.

3 ar

e co

nsid

ered

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

The

CS

7.1

RC

S le

vel i

ndic

atio

n is

the

low

est a

ccur

ate

read

ing

poss

ible

, but

is

high

er th

an th

e gu

idan

ce s

etpo

int.

Add

ed w

ordi

ng ‘L

oss

of R

PV in

vent

ory

as in

dica

ted

by’ t

o C

S7.

1.b

to m

aint

ain

cons

iste

ncy

with

CA

7.1

wor

ding

in th

e es

cala

tion

path

way

.

Rem

oved

the

wor

d ‘re

adin

g’ C

S7.

3.a

bulle

t 1 (N

EI C

S1.3

.a b

ulle

t 1) f

or h

uman

fa

ctor

s co

nsid

erat

ions

(min

imiz

e ex

trane

ous

wor

ds).

Rep

lace

‘une

xpla

ined

’ with

‘unp

lann

ed’ t

o m

atch

wor

ding

of C

G7.

2 (N

EI

CG

1.2)

and

to p

reve

nt p

oten

tial c

onfu

sion

in th

e us

e of

sep

arat

e te

rms.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

CA

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Loss

of R

CS

/RP

V in

vent

ory.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

Loss

of R

CS

/RP

V in

vent

ory

as in

dica

ted

by le

vel l

ess

than

(site

spe

cific

le

vel).

[Low

-Low

EC

CS

act

uatio

n se

tpoi

nt /

Leve

l 2 (B

WR

)]

[Bot

tom

ID o

f the

RC

S lo

op (P

WR

)]

2.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l can

not b

e m

onito

red

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger w

ith a

loss

of

RC

S/R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

an

unex

plai

ned

leve

l ris

e in

(site

sp

ecifi

c su

mp

or ta

nk).

CA

7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

RC

S le

vel (

[JEF

10 C

L081

]) <

[CA

7.1]

.

OR

2.

a.

RC

S le

vel c

anno

t be

mon

itore

d fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

UN

PLA

NN

ED

leve

l ris

e in

IR

WS

T.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

L C

A7.

2 is

con

side

red

adm

inis

trativ

e.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

The

CA

7.1

RC

S le

vel i

ndic

atio

n is

the

low

est a

ccur

ate

read

ing

poss

ible

, but

is

high

er th

an th

e gu

idan

ce s

etpo

int.

Rep

lace

‘une

xpla

ined

’ with

‘unp

lann

ed’ t

o m

atch

wor

ding

of C

G7.

2 (N

EI

CG

1.2)

and

to p

reve

nt p

oten

tial c

onfu

sion

in th

e us

e of

sep

arat

e te

rms.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 35: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 34

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CU

1

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

RC

S L

eaka

ge.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

:

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

RC

S le

akag

e re

sults

in th

e in

abilit

y to

mai

ntai

n or

rest

ore

RP

V le

vel

grea

ter t

han

(site

spe

cific

low

leve

l RP

S ac

tuat

ion

setp

oint

) for

15

min

utes

or

long

er. [

BW

R]

1.

RC

S le

akag

e re

sults

in th

e in

abilit

y to

mai

ntai

n or

rest

ore

leve

l with

in (s

ite

spec

ific

pres

suriz

er o

r RC

S/R

PV

leve

l tar

get b

and)

for 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lo

nger

. [P

WR

]

CU

7

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

RC

S le

akag

e.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5

EALs

:

1.

RC

S le

akag

e re

sults

in th

e in

abilit

y to

mai

ntai

n or

rest

ore

RC

S le

vel >

Pr

oced

ure

Esta

blis

hed

Min

imum

Lev

el fo

r 15

min

utes

or l

onge

r.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

CU

2

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

UN

PLA

NN

ED

Los

s of

RC

S/R

PV

inve

ntor

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l dro

p as

indi

cate

d by

eith

er o

f the

follo

win

g:

� R

CS

/RP

V w

ater

leve

l dro

p be

low

the

RPV

flan

ge fo

r 15

min

utes

or

long

er w

hen

the

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l ban

d is

est

ablis

hed

abov

e th

e R

PV

flang

e.

� R

CS

wat

er le

vel d

rop

belo

w th

e R

CS

leve

l ban

d fo

r 15

min

utes

or

long

er w

hen

the

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l ban

d is

alre

ady

belo

w th

e R

PV

fla

nge.

2.

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l can

not b

e m

onito

red

with

a lo

ss o

f RC

S/R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

in

dica

ted

by a

n un

expl

aine

d le

vel r

ise

in (s

ite s

peci

fic s

ump

or ta

nk).

CU

8

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of R

CS

inve

ntor

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 6

EALs

:

1.

a.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

RC

S le

vel d

rop

belo

w th

e R

PV

flan

ge fo

r 15

min

utes

or

long

er w

hen

the

RC

S le

vel b

and

is e

stab

lishe

d ab

ove

the

RP

V fl

ange

.

OR

b.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

RC

S le

vel d

rop

< Pr

oced

ure

Esta

blis

hed

Min

imum

Le

vel f

or 1

5 m

inut

es o

r lon

ger w

hen

the

RC

S le

vel b

and

is

esta

blis

hed

belo

w th

e R

PV

flan

ge.

OR

2.

a.

RC

S le

vel c

anno

t be

mon

itore

d.

AN

D

b.

Loss

of R

PV

inve

ntor

y as

indi

cate

d by

UN

PLA

NN

ED

leve

l ris

e in

IR

WS

T.

Not

e: C

hang

es to

the

nest

ing

form

at o

f EA

L C

U8

is c

onsi

dere

d ad

min

istra

tive.

Diff

eren

ces

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Rep

lace

‘une

xpla

ined

’ with

‘unp

lann

ed’ t

o m

atch

wor

ding

of C

G7.

2 (N

EI

CG

1.2)

and

to p

reve

nt p

oten

tial c

onfu

sion

in th

e us

e of

sep

arat

e te

rms.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

Page 36: Callaway Plant Unit 2 EAL Comparisons and Technical Bases for … · 2012-12-01 · NEI specified plant annunciation and safety indication EALs to be set at a loss of all or most

Encl

osur

e B

, Atta

chm

ent 2

EA

L C

ompa

rison

Tab

le

Cal

law

ay P

lant

Uni

t 2

Pag

e 35

R

evis

ion

1

NEI

99-

01 R

ev. 5

N

ew E

ALs

D

iffer

ence

or D

evia

tion

CA

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- ALE

RT

Inab

ility

to m

aint

ain

plan

t in

cold

shu

tdow

n.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (E

AL

1 or

2)

1.

An

UN

PLA

NN

ED

eve

nt re

sults

in R

CS

tem

pera

ture

gre

ater

than

(site

sp

ecifi

c Te

chni

cal S

peci

ficat

ion

cold

shu

tdow

n te

mpe

ratu

re li

mit)

for

grea

ter t

han

the

spec

ified

dur

atio

n on

tabl

e.

Tabl

e: R

CS

Reh

eat D

urat

ion

Thre

shol

ds

RC

S C

onta

inm

ent C

losu

re

Dur

atio

n In

tact

(but

not

RC

S

Red

uced

Inve

ntor

y [P

WR

])]

N/A

60

min

utes

*

Not

Inta

ct o

r RC

S

Red

uced

Inve

ntor

y (P

WR

)

Est

ablis

hed

20 m

inut

es*

Not

Est

ablis

hed

0 m

inut

es

* If a

n R

CS

hea

t rem

oval

sys

tem

is in

ope

ratio

n w

ithin

this

tim

e fra

me

and

RC

S te

mpe

ratu

re is

bei

ng re

duce

d, th

e E

AL

is n

ot a

pplic

able

.

2.

An

UN

PLA

NN

ED

eve

nt re

sults

in R

CS

pre

ssur

e in

crea

se g

reat

er th

an 1

0 ps

i due

to a

loss

of R

CS

coo

ling.

(PW

R-T

his

EA

L do

es n

ot a

pply

in S

olid

P

lant

con

ditio

ns.)

CA

10

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

Inab

ility

to m

aint

ain

plan

t in

cold

shu

tdow

n.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

RC

S te

mpe

ratu

re >

200

° F fo

r the

spe

cifie

d du

ratio

n on

Tab

le C

-2.

Tabl

e C

-2: R

CS

Reh

eat D

urat

ion

Thre

shol

ds

RC

S C

onta

inm

ent C

losu

re

Dur

atio

n In

tact

with

Ful

l R

CS

Inve

ntor

y N

/A

> 60

min

utes

*

Not

Inta

ct

OR

R

educ

ed R

CS

In

vent

ory

Est

ablis

hed

> 20

min

utes

* N

ot E

stab

lishe

d 0

min

utes

* If a

n R

CS

hea

t rem

oval

sys

tem

is in

ope

ratio

n w

ithin

this

tim

e fra

me

and

RC

S te

mpe

ratu

re is

bei

ng re

duce

d, th

is E

AL

is n

ot a

pplic

able

.

OR

2.

RC

S p

ress

ure

rise

> 10

psi

g du

e to

a lo

ss o

f RC

S c

oolin

g (th

is E

AL d

oes

not a

pply

in s

olid

pla

nt c

ondi

tions

).

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

‘An

unpl

anne

d ev

ent r

esul

ts in

’ fro

m C

A10

.1 a

s no

pla

nned

ev

olut

ions

are

con

duct

ed th

at in

tent

iona

lly v

iola

te th

e TS

col

d sh

utdo

wn

tem

pera

ture

lim

it (ir

rele

vant

wor

ding

).

Rem

oved

‘An

unpl

anne

d ev

ent r

esul

ts in

’ fro

m C

A10

.2 a

s no

pla

nned

eve

nt

wou

ld in

clud

e a

loss

of R

CS

coo

ling

caus

ing

RC

S p

ress

ure

to ri

se >

10

psi

(irre

leva

nt w

ordi

ng).

Mod

ified

gen

eric

bas

is w

ordi

ng to

refle

ct ‘i

ntac

t’ te

rmin

olog

y.

Dev

iatio

ns

Non

e

CU

4

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion

- NO

TIF

OF

UN

USU

AL

EVEN

T

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of d

ecay

hea

t rem

oval

cap

abilit

y w

ith ir

radi

ated

fuel

in th

e R

PV

.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: Col

d S

hutd

own,

Ref

uelin

g

Exam

ple

Emer

genc

y A

ctio

n Le

vels

: (1

or 2

)

Not

e:

The

Em

erge

ncy

Dire

ctor

sho

uld

not w

ait u

ntil

the

appl

icab

le ti

me

has

elap

sed,

but

sho

uld

decl

are

the

even

t as

soon

as

it is

det

erm

ined

that

th

e co

nditi

on w

ill lik

ely

exce

ed th

e ap

plic

able

tim

e.

1.

UN

PLA

NN

ED

eve

nt re

sults

in R

CS

tem

pera

ture

exc

eedi

ng th

e Te

chni

cal

Spe

cific

atio

n co

ld s

hutd

own

tem

pera

ture

lim

it.

2.

Loss

of a

ll R

CS

tem

pera

ture

and

RC

S/R

PV

leve

l ind

icat

ion

for 1

5 m

inut

es

or lo

nger

.

CU

10

Initi

atin

g C

ondi

tion:

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of d

ecay

hea

t rem

oval

cap

abilit

y.

Ope

ratin

g M

ode

App

licab

ility

: 5, 6

EALs

:

1.

RC

S te

mpe

ratu

re >

200

° F d

ue to

an

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of d

ecay

hea

t re

mov

al c

apab

ility.

OR

2.

Loss

of A

LL R

CS

tem

pera

ture

and

RC

S le

vel i

ndic

atio

n fo

r 15

min

utes

or

long

er.

Diff

eren

ces

Rem

oved

IC w

ordi

ng ‘w

ith Ir

radi

ated

Fue

l in

the

RP

V’ s

ince

it is

redu

ndan

t with

m

ode

5 an

d 6

and

to b

e co

nsis

tent

with

the

othe

r C re

cogn

ition

cat

egor

y m

ode

5 an

d 6

ICs.

Not

e co

nten

t has

bee

n m

oved

to th

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

desc

riptio

n an

d in

stru

ctio

ns

sect

ion

as it

is a

pplic

able

to a

ll tim

e im

bedd

ed E

ALs

and

is a

fund

amen

tal

inst

ruct

ion

for c

lass

ifica

tion,

not

a th

resh

old

crite

rion.

Spe

cifie

d th

e ‘u

npla

nned

eve

nt’ a

s an

UN

PLA

NN

ED

loss

of d

ecay

hea

t re

mov

al c

apab

ility

to m

atch

IC w

ordi

ng a

nd b

asis

inte

nt.