capacitive power transfer for contactless...

Capacitive Power Transfer for Contactless Charging

Mitchell KlineIgor Izyumin

Prof. Bernhard BoserProf. Seth Sanders

Why Wireless Power?

The Powermat

“…I started to wonder if the magnet on the iPhone case was safe in my pocket where I also keep my credit cards…

I was told that I should remove my iPhone from the case after charging because [it] was not intended for daily use. ”

Thomas Scholle1 star amazon review

“you'll need to invest another $40 per device to get the full functionality as you see it advertised. Too pricey for me!”

J. Lincoln2star amazon review

Wireless Power Technology

1. Inductive 2. Capacitive

Close-coupled wireless power transfer

Power Source Load

Power Source Load

Capacitive Power Transfer System

Powertrainoptimization

Alignment and load sensitivity

1 2

Requirements

• 3.5 pF/cm2(¼ mm air gap) with ~50 cm2gives 150 pF

• Need >2.5 W (USB spec.)

Prior Art

A. Hu. 2008.Soccer Playing Robot13.9 nF217 kHz~40 W?44% efficient

E. Culurciello. 2008.Inter-chip power transfer10 fF15 MHz~100 uW?~1% efficient?

Optimization Approach

Given Pout and C, how do we maximize the efficiency?

or

What is the minimum required C to achieve a particular Pout and efficiency?

C

Pout

Powertrain Architecture

Efficiency Expression

Maximize Fixed

Minimize:Large switchSmall inductor

Minimize:Increase voltage

Does not consider switching losses => Eliminate with ZVS

out

St

PRi 2

211

Approximate ZVS Analysis

1arctan 2

2

D

S

s

t

VV

vi

Approximate ZVS Analysis

Initial chargeqt = Charge removed by inductor

Sosssw VCq 2

ZVS Condition

qt = Charge removed by inductor

From integration:

ZVS requires:

Refactored as:

cos1 tt

iq

swt qq

S

D

ossSD

out

VV

CVVP 1

264.0

Example Design

Pout = 4 W, VS = 35 V, and RonCoss = 44 ps

Example Design

Choose η = 0.9, Q = 40• Minimum C is

147 pF• Optimum VD/VS

is 0.8• Optimum switch

size Coss = 13 pF

Simulation Results

Prototype Powertrain Circuit

12 uHQ = 42Coilcraft1812LS

125 pF

NXP SchottkyPMEG6002EJ

Siliconix Si1029X

8 pF

3.5 Ω

35 V 28 V

Experimental Results


Powertrainoptimization

Alignment and load sensitivity

1 2

Automatic Frequency Tuning

Automatic Duty Cycle Control

Light-load condition: not enough current in tank to get Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS)

VS

½ LresidualIL2

Load½ Csw VS

2

IL

Automatic Duty Cycle Control

SHUTDOWN

Supply Current

DC Output Voltage


IS

VL+ -Csw

Load

With 6 by 10 cm2, we transfer 3.8 W at

83% efficiency over a 0.5 mm air gap.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 1 2 3 4Effi

cien

cyor

Dut

y C

ycle

Output Power [W]

Controller

H-Bridge & Inductors

Buck Converter

Rectifier

Conclusion

Power transfer over small capacitors is enabled by

1. Zero Voltage SwitchingEnable moderate voltage, high frequency operation

2. Automatic TuningRobust to changes in coupling capacitance

3. Duty cycle adjustment without RX feedbackPreserve efficiency at light loads

Thank You!

This material is based upon work supported by the

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under Contract No. W31P4Q-10-1-0002

AcknowledgementsDr. Mei-Lin ChanDr. Simone GambiniProf. David HorsleyDr. MischaMegensJames PengRichard PrzybylaKun WangProf. Ming Wu

capacitive power transfer for contactless...

Documents