capacity and process selection

Upload: satish-kumar-karna

Post on 02-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    1/56

    1

    Capacity Planning

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    2/56

    2

    Capacity and Strategy

    Capacity decisions must be integrated into

    the mission and strategy of organization

    All 10 OM decisions as well as marketingand finance are impacted by changes in

    capacity

    Investments in capacity not to be isolated

    but a coordinated step to achieve

    organizations objective

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    3/56

    3

    Types of Planning Over aTime Horizon

    Add FacilitiesAdd long lead time equipment

    Schedule JobsSchedule PersonnelAllocate Machinery

    Sub-ContractAdd EquipmentAdd Shifts

    Add PersonnelBuild or Use Inventory

    Long RangePlanning

    IntermediateRange Planning

    Short RangePlanning

    Modify Capacity Use Capacity

    *

    *

    *Limited options exist

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    4/564

    Definition and Measures of Capacity

    Design

    Capacity:

    The maximum throughput,or number of units

    a facility can produce in a period of time.

    Utilization: Actual output as a percent of design capacity.

    Effectivecapacity:

    Capacity a firm can expect to receive given itsproduct mix, methods of scheduling, maintenance,and standards of quality.

    Efficiency: Actual output as a percent of effective capacity.

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    5/565

    Measure of planned or actual capacityusage of a facility, work center, ormachine

    UtilizationActual Output

    Design Capacity

    Planned hours to be usedTotal hours available

    =

    =

    Utilization

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    6/566

    Measure of how well a facility or machine isperforming when used

    Efficiency Actual outputEffective Capacity

    Actual output in units

    Standard output in units

    =

    =

    Efficiency

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    7/56

    Capacity

    Facilities

    Product and Service Factors

    Process Factors Human Factors

    Operational Factors

    Supply Chain Factors External Factors

    Operations Management 7

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    8/56

    Steps in Capacity Planning

    Estimate future capacity requirements.

    Evaluate existing capacity and facilities and identifygaps.

    Identify alternatives for meeting requirements. Conduct financial analyses of each alternative.

    Assess key qualitative issues for each alternative.

    Select the alternative to pursue that will be best in

    the long term. Implement the selected alternative.

    Monitor results.

    Operations Management 8

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    9/56

    9

    Approaches to CapacityExpansion

    Expected DemandExpected Demand

    Expected Demand Expected Demand

    Time in Years Time in Years

    Time in YearsTime in Years

    Demand

    Demand

    Dem

    and

    Demand

    New Capacity

    New CapacityNew Capacity

    New Capacity

    Capacity leads demand with an incremental expansion Capacity leads demand with a one-step expansion

    Capacity lags demand with an incremental expansionAttempts to have an average capacity, with

    an incremental expansion

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    10/56

    Service Capacity Planning

    Operations Management 10

    Service capacity planning can present a number ofchallenges related to:

    The need to be near customers

    Convenience

    The inability to store servicesCannot store services for consumption later

    The degree of demand volatilityVolume and timing of demandTime required to service individual customers

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    11/56

    Developing Capacity

    Alternatives

    Operations Management 11

    Things that can be done to enhance capacity management: Design flexibility into systems Take stage of life cycle into account Take a big-pictureapproach to capacity changes Prepare to deal with capacity chunks Attempt to smooth capacity requirements Identify the optimal operating level Choose a strategy if expansion is involved

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    12/56

    Evaluation of Alternatives

    Operations Management 12

    Break Even Analysis Cash Flow and NPV Analysis Decision Theory Waiting Line Analysis Simulation

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    13/56

    16

    Breakeven Analysis

    Technique for evaluating process &

    equipment alternatives

    Objective: Find the point ($ or units) atwhich total cost equals total revenue

    Assumptions

    Revenue & costs are related linearly to volume All information is known with certainty

    No time value of money

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    14/56

    17

    Break-Even Analysis

    Fixed costs: costs that continue even if

    no units are produced: depreciation,

    taxes, debt, mortgage payments, salaries,etc

    Variable costs: costs that vary with the

    volume of units produced: labor wages,

    materials, portion of utilities

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    15/56

    18

    Breakeven Chart

    Fixed cost

    Variable cost

    Total cost line

    Total revenue line

    ProfitBreakeven point

    Total cost = Total revenue

    Volume (units/period)

    CostinDollars

    Loss

    Profit

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    16/56

    Operations Management 19

    Crossover Chart

    Smooth Boards Inc., wants to enter the market quickly with a new finishon its ski boards. It has three choices:

    Repair the old equipment at a cost of $800,Make major modifications at the cost of $1,100, orPurchase new equipment at a net cost of $1,800

    If the firm chooses to repair the old equipment, materials and labor costwould be $1.10 per board. If it chooses to make modifications, materialsand labor cost would be $0.70 per board. If it buys new equipment,variable costs are estimated at $0.40 per board.

    Graph the three total cost lines on the same chart (preferably on graphpaper)Which alternative would be chosen if more than 3,000 ski-boards can besold?Which alternative should the firm use if it thinks the market for boards

    would be between 1,000 and 2,000?What are the cross-over points from the graph?

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    17/56

    Operations Management 20

    Crossover Chart

    Fixed cost - Process AFixed cost - Process B

    Fixed cost - Process C

    Process A: low volume, high variety

    Process B: Repetitive

    Process C: High volume, low variety

    Process CProcess BProcess A Lowest cost process

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    18/56

    Operations Management 21

    Decision Theory

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    19/56

    represents a general approach to decision makingwhich is suitable for a wide range of operations

    management decisions, including:

    product and

    service

    design

    equipment

    selection

    location

    planning

    Decision Theory

    Capacity

    planning

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    20/56

    Decision Theory Elements

    Operations Management 23

    A set of possible future conditions existsthat will have a bearing on the results ofthe decision

    A list of alternatives for the manager tochoose from

    A known payoff for each alternative

    under each possible future condition

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    21/56

    Decision Theory Process

    Operations Management 24

    Identify possible future conditions:

    Develop a list of possible alternatives,one ofwhich may be to do nothing

    Determine the payoff associated with eachalternative for every future condition

    If possible, determine the likelihood of each

    possible future condition

    Evaluate alternatives according to some decisioncriterionand select the best alternative

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    22/56

    Decision Theory Process

    Operations Management 25

    Bounded RationalityThe limitations on decision making caused by costs,

    human abilities, time, technology, and availability ofinformation

    Sub-optimization

    The result of different departments each attempting toreach a solution that is optimum for that department

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    23/56

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    24/56

    Payoff Table

    A table showing the expected payoffs for eachalternative in every possible state of nature

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    Adecision is being made concerning which size facilityshould be constructed

    The present value (in millions) for each alternative undereach state of nature is expressed in the body of the above

    payoff tableStudent Slides

    Decision Making under

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    25/56

    Decision Making under

    Uncertaintity

    Operations Management 28

    Decisions are sometimes made under completeuncertainty: No information is available on how likelythe various states of nature are.

    Decision Criteria: Maximin

    Choose the alternative with the best of the worst possiblepayoffs

    Maximax

    Choose the alternative with the best possible payoff

    Laplace Choose the alternative with the best average payoff

    Minimax regret

    Choose the alternative that has the least of the worst regrets

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    26/56

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium Facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    Example Maximin Criterion

    The worst payoff for each alternative isSmall facility: $10 millionMedium facility $7 million

    Large facility -$4 millionChoose to construct a small facility

    Student Slides

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    27/56

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium Facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    Example Maximax Criterion

    The best payoff for each alternative isSmall facility: $10 millionMedium facility $12 million

    Large facility $16 millionChoose to construct a large facility

    Student Slides5S-30

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    28/56

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium Facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    Example Laplace Criterion

    The average payoff for each alternative isSmall facility: (10+10+10)/3 = $10 millionMedium facility (7+12+12)/3 = $10.33 millionLarge facility (-4+2+16)/3 = $4.67 million

    Choose to construct a medium facility

    Student Slides5S-31

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    29/56

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium Facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    Example Minimax Regret

    Construct a regret(or opportunity loss) tableThe difference between a given payoff and the bestpayoff for a state of nature

    Regrets

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $0 $2 $6

    MediumFacility

    3 0 4

    Large Facility 14 10 0Student Slides

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    30/56

    Regrets

    Alternatives Low Moderate High

    Small Facility $0 $2 $6

    Medium Facility 3 0 4

    Large Facility 14 10 0

    Example Minimax Regret

    Identify the worst regret for each alternativeSmall facility $6 millionMedium facility $4 millionLarge facility $14 million

    Select the alternative with the minimum of the maximumregrets

    Build a medium facility

    Student Slides5S-33

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    31/56

    Decision Making Under Risk

    Operations Management 34

    Decisions made under the condition that theprobability of occurrence for each state of naturecan be estimated

    A widely applied criterion is expected monetaryvalue (EMV) EMV

    Determine the expected payoff of each alternative,

    and choose the alternative that has the best expectedpayoff

    This approach is most appropriate when the decisionmaker is neither risk averse nor risk seeking

    E l EMV

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    32/56

    Possible Future Demand

    Alternatives Low (.30) Moderate (.50) High (.20)

    Small Facility $10 $10 $10

    Medium Facility 7 12 12

    Large Facility (4) 2 16

    ExampleEMV

    EMVsmall = .30(10) +.50(10) +.20(10) = 10EMVmedium = .30(7) + .50(12) + .20(12) = 10.5EMVlarge = .30(-4) + .50(2) + .20(16) = $3

    Build a medium facility

    Student Slides5S-35

    D i i T

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    33/56

    Decision Tree

    Operations Management 36

    Decision tree A schematic representation of the available alternatives and

    their possible consequences Useful for analyzing sequential decisions Composed of

    Nodes Decisions represented by square nodes Chance events represented by circular nodes

    Branches Alternativesbranches leaving a square node

    Chance eventsbranches leaving a circular node

    Analyze from right to left For each decision, choose the alternative that will yield

    the greatest return If chance events follow a decision, choose the

    alternative that has the highest expected monetaryvalue (or lowest expected cost)

    Information

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    34/56

    Information

    Expected value of perfect information:thedifference between the expected payoff undercertainty and the expected payoff under risk

    Expected value of

    perfect information

    Expected payoff

    under certainty

    Expected payoff

    under risk=-

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    35/56

    Operations Management 38

    Process Strategy

    P St t i

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    36/56

    39

    Process Strategies

    Process value creation activities Process strategy organizations

    approach for producing goods or

    providing services Objective

    Meet or exceed customer requirements

    Meet cost & managerial goals

    Has long-run effects Production efficiency

    Product & volume flexibility

    Cost & qualityOperations Management

    Process

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    37/56

    Process

    Job Shop

    Batch Processing

    Repeat Processing

    Continuous Processing

    Operations Management 40

    P d t P M t i

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    38/56

    41

    Product-Process Matrix

    Process focus

    projects, job

    shop,(machine, print,

    carpentry)

    Repetitive

    (autos, motorcycles)

    Product focus

    (commercial baked

    goods, steel, glass)

    High Variety

    One or few units per

    run, high variety

    (allows customization)

    Changes in modules

    Modest runs, standardized

    modules

    Changes in attributes(such as grade, quality,

    size, thickness, etc.)

    Long runs only

    MassCustomization

    (difficult to achieve,

    but huge rewards)

    Poor strategy

    Low-Volume

    (Intermittent)

    Repetitive Process

    (Modular)High-Volume

    (Continuous)

    Operations Management

    Process Focused Strategy

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    39/56

    42

    Process-Focused Strategy

    Facilities are organized around specificactivities or processes

    General purpose equipment and skilled

    personnel

    High degree of product flexibility

    Typically high costs and low equipment

    utilization

    Product flows may vary considerablymaking planning and scheduling a

    challengeOperations Management

    Repetitive Focused Strategy

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    40/56

    46

    Repetitive Focused Strategy

    Facilities often organized by assemblylines

    Characterized by modules

    Parts & assemblies made previously

    Modules combined for many output

    options

    Other names

    Assembly line

    E.g. auto-manufacturing, fast-food, pcs, house-

    hold appliances, etcOperations Management

    Product Focused Strategy

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    41/56

    50

    Product-Focused Strategy

    Facilities are organized by product High volume, low variety

    Conversion or further processing of

    undifferentiated materials such as petroleum,chemicals, or beer

    Follows a predetermined sequence of steps, but

    flow is continuous rather than discrete

    highlystandardized

    Other names

    Line flow productionOperations Management

    Mass Customization

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    42/56

    55

    Mass Customization

    Using technology and imagination to

    rapidly mass-produce products that cater

    to unique customer desires

    Under mass customization the three

    process models become so flexible that

    distinctions between them blur, makingvariety and volume issues less significant

    Operations Management

    Process Strategies

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    43/56

    56

    Process Strategies

    Rapid throughputtechniques

    Mass Customization

    Modular techniques

    Repetitive FocusModular designFlexible equipment

    Product-focusedLow variety, high volume

    High utilization (70% - 80%)Specialized equipment

    Process-focusedHigh variety, low volume

    Low utilization (5% - 20%)General purpose equipment

    Effective schedulingtechniques

    Operations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    44/56

    Techniques for Improving ServiceP d i i C i d

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    45/56

    71

    Productivity - Continued

    Modules

    Automation

    Scheduling

    Training

    Modular selection of

    service. Modular

    production

    Separating servicesthatlend themselves toautomation

    Precise personnelscheduling

    Clarifying the serviceoptions

    Explaininghow to avoidOperations Management

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    46/56

    Facility Layout

    Operations Management 72

    What is Facility Layout

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    47/56

    What is Facility Layout

    Location or arrangement of everything

    within & around buildings

    Determines long-run efficiency of

    operations

    Helps achieve a strategy that supportsdifferentiation, low cost or quick

    response

    OM - location and layout strategy

    Basic Objective

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    48/56

    Basic Objective

    product or service quality enhancement

    To use workers and space efficiently.

    To avoid bottlenecks.

    To minimize material handling costs.

    To eliminate unnecessary movements ofworkers or materials.

    To minimize production time or customerservice time.

    To design for safety

    OM - location and layout strategy

    Types of Layout

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    49/56

    Types of Layout

    Product Layout

    Process Layout

    Fixed Position Layout

    Hybrid Layout

    OM - location and layout strategy

    Repetitive Processing:

    P d t L t

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    50/56

    Product layout Layout that uses standardized processing

    operations to achieve smooth, rapid, high-

    volume flow

    Product Layouts

    Used for Repetitive Processing

    Repetitive or Continuous

    Raw materials

    or customer

    Finished

    item

    Station

    2

    Station

    3

    Station

    4

    Material

    and/or

    labor

    Material

    and/or

    labor

    Material

    and/or

    labor

    Material

    and/or

    labor

    Station

    1

    Student Slides 6-76

    Non-repetitive Processing:

    P L t

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    51/56

    Process layouts Layouts that can handle varied processing

    requirements

    Process Layouts

    Used for Intermittent processing

    Job Shop or Batch

    Dept. A

    Dept. B Dept. D

    Dept. C

    Dept. F

    Dept. E

    Student Slides 6-77

    Fixed Position Layouts

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    52/56

    Fixed Position layout Layout in which the product or project remains

    stationary, and workers, materials, andequipment are moved as needed

    Fixed Position Layouts

    Student Slides 6-78

    Combination Layouts

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    53/56

    y

    Operations Management 79

    Some operational environments use a combination ofthe three basic layout types: Hospitals

    Supermarket

    Shipyards Some organizations are moving away from process

    layouts in an effort to capture the benefits of productlayouts

    Cellular manufacturing Flexible manufacturing systems

    Line Balancing

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    54/56

    g

    Line balancing The process of assigning tasks to workstations in such a

    way that the workstations have approximately equal timerequirements

    Goal: Obtain task grouping that represent approximately

    equal time requirements since this minimizes idletime along the line and results in a high utilization ofequipment and labor

    Why is line balancing important?

    1. It allows us to use labor and equipment moreefficiently.

    2. To avoid fairness issues that arise when one

    workstation must work harder than another.Operations Management 80

    Designing Process Layouts

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    55/56

    g g y

    Operations Management 82

    The main issue in designing processlayouts concerns the relative placement ofthe departments

    Measuring effectiveness A major objective in designing process layouts

    is to minimize transportation cost, distance, ortime

    Information Requirements

  • 8/10/2019 Capacity and Process Selection

    56/56

    q

    In designing process layouts, the followinginformation is required:1. A list of departments to be arranged and their dimensions

    2. A projection of future work flows between the pairs of work

    centers3. The distance between locations and the cost per unit of

    distance to move loads between them

    4. The amount of money to be invested in the layout

    5. A list of any special considerations

    6. The location of key utilities, access and exit points, etc.

    Operations Management 83