case 1:13-cv-00663-lek-ksc document 390 filed 03/30/18

1 pa-1751905

Of Counsel: ALSTON, HUNT, FLOYD & ING Attorneys at Law A Law Corporation PAUL ALSTON 1126 J. BLAINE ROGERS 8606 CLAIRE WONG BLACK 9645 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1800 Honolulu, Hawaiì 96813 Telephone: (808) 524-1800 Facsimile: (808) 524-4591 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Class Counsel for Plaintiffs continued on next page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAIÌ

PATRICIA SHEEHEY, PATRICK SHEEHEY, RAYNETTE AH CHONG, individually and on behalf of the class of licensed foster care providers residing in the state of Hawaiì,

Plaintiffs, vs.

PANKAJ BHANOT, in his official capacity as the Director of the Hawaiì Department of Human Services,

Defendant.

Case No. CV13-00663 LEK-KSC PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED, UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AWARD AND APPROVAL OF AMENDED SETTLEMENT REGARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS; DECLARATIONS OF CLAIRE WONG BLACK; MARC DAVID PETERS, GAVIN THORNTON, EXHIBITS “A”-“F”; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 390 Filed 03/30/18 of 11 PageID #: 10719

CLASS COUNSEL (continued from previous page)

HAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE VICTOR GEMINIANI 4354 GAVIN THORNTON 7922 119 Merchant Street, Suite 605 Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813 Telephone: (808) 587-7605 Email: [email protected] [email protected]

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MARC D. PETERS Pro Hac Vice ALESSA Y. HWANG Pro Hac Vice JAMES R. HANCOCK Pro Hac Vice 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]


mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED, UNOPPOSED1 MOTION FOR AWARD AND APPROVAL OF AMENDED SETTLEMENT

REGARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO NAMED PLAINTIFFS

I. History of the Failed 2017 Settlement and 2018 Amended Settlement

Last March, on the eve of trial, the State agreed to a global settlement

with Hawaii’s foster families in this action and a companion action filed in the

First Circuit Court, State of Hawaiì.2 The settlement would have increased the

Hawaiì Department of Human Services’ (HDHS) monthly board reimbursement

and annual clothing stipend to foster families and required HDHS to account for

Hawaii’s higher costs of living as compared to the mainland and inflation when

setting future board rates, among other things. The settlement promised millions in

added benefits for foster families.

As is often true, the settlement was contingent upon funding from the

Legislature. And despite strong backing from the Governor, the Attorney General,

HDHS, and thousands of hard-working foster families, key legislators took the

unprecedented step of refusing to fund the settlement. They viewed the settlement 1 Although HDHS does not oppose this motion, it does not agree, concede, or adopt Plaintiffs’ description of the facts and issues presented, or the factual or procedural background. To the contrary, HDHS has continued to assert that its conduct was lawful at all times. 2 Ah Chong v. Wong, Civil No. 13-00663 LEK-KSC, Dkt. 327 (Settlement on the Record); id., Dkt. 340-3 (Federal Settlement Agreement); Dkt. 340-4 (State Settlement Agreement in Sheehey v. State, Civil No. 14-1-1709-08 VLC (First Circuit Court, State of Hawaiì)).


2

as “judicial overreach” meddling with “legislative prerogative”3 and claimed that

the agreed-upon limit on Class Counsel’s fees and costs in the federal action was

too high—even though the State refused many overtures to resolve the dispute

when the fees were much lower, the lodestar fees were much higher, and the

amount was negotiated with great vigor by the Attorney General, leading to a

greatly reduced fee.4 Indeed, the amount then agreed upon was so low only

because Class Counsel cared deeply for the welfare of the foster families and were

willing to accept below-market-rate compensation to see that the money started

flowing to the foster families without delay.

Because of the legislators’ disregard for the Court and the

recommendations of the executive branch, it became necessary to restart the

litigation. As a result, the Court set a new, March 2018 trial date, Dkt. 361, and the

parties resumed trial preparations. In 2018, the parties renewed settlement

negotiations while continuing to prepare for trial. Class Counsel voluntarily

reduced the attorneys’ fees further so that the legislature would have no excuse to

hold up the settlement that the litigants (and Governor) agreed to.

3 See https://www.pressreader.com/usa/honolulu-star-advertiser/20170521/281479276353378 4 See http://www.civilbeat.org/2017/05/how-house-leaders-scuttled-better-pay-for-foster-parents/


3

On March 7, 2018, the parties placed the essential terms of an

amended settlement on the record before Judge Chang. Dkt. 384. The two material

changes to the 2017 settlement are: (1) extension of the 2017 Legislative

Enactment date and effective date of board rate increases from to June 30, 2018

and July 1, 2018, respectively; and (2) reduction of Class Counsel’s fees and costs

for the federal lawsuit from $1,100,000 to $850,000—which is a fraction of the

fees incurred and costs fronted by Class Counsel over the past four years in order

to vindicate the rights of Hawaii’s foster families.

II. The Voluntarily-Reduced Request for $850,000.00 in Attorneys’ Fees and Costs Is Manifestly Reasonable and Should Be Approved5

Fee awards must ensure that civil rights lawyers receive reasonable

compensation for their services. Corder v. Gates, 947 F.2d 374, 378 (9th Cir.

1991). Section 1988 authorizes the district courts to award reasonable attorneys’

fees to prevailing parties6 in civil rights litigation. 28 U.S.C. § 1988. The purpose

of Section 1988 is to ensure effective access to the judicial process for persons

with civil rights grievances. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 429 (1983).

Indeed, in enacting Section 1988, Congress elected to encourage meritorious civil

rights claims because of the benefits of such litigation for the named plaintiff and

5 See also Dkt. 348 (Unopposed Motion for Award and Approval of Settlement Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and Service Awards), attached as Exhibit “F” and incorporated herein by reference.

6 Plaintiffs are prevailing parties. See Exhibit F, Dkt. 348 at PageID#:10132-10134.


4

for society at large. Corder, 947 F.2d at 377 (quoting Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489

U.S. 87, 96 (1989)). And, the Ninth Circuit has suggested that civil rights cases

that confer non-monetary benefits “possibly justify[ ] a higher fee award.”

Gonzalez v. City of Maywood, 729 F.3d 1196, 1210 (9th Cir. 2013) (emphasis

added).

While attorneys’ fees and costs may be awarded in a certified class

action where authorized by law or the parties’ agreement, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h),

courts have an independent obligation to ensure that the award, like the settlement

itself, is reasonable, even if the parties have already agreed to an amount. Staton v.

Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 963–64 (9th Cir. 2003). Foremost in considering the

reasonableness of an award is the benefit obtained for the class. Hensley, 461 U.S.

at 434–36.

Here, the benefit obtained for the Class is significant and lasting. Prior

to this litigation, the State had not increased the foster board rate for 24 years. The

Legislature acknowledged in 2009 that the foster board rate was “insufficient to

raise a child because costs for food, housing, utilities, clothing, and other

necessities have increased” since the rate was last set in 1990. See Dkt. 146-4

(House Resolution H.R. 209). Yet, year after year, HDHS turned down foster

families’ requests for board rate increases, Dkt. 146-5-146-7 (legislative testimony


5

opposing efforts to increase board rates), and refused to incorporate cost of living

increases into the rate-setting process.

Throughout this litigation, HDHS maintained that it has been

overpaying foster families by as much as $324 each month. Dkt. 314-6 (Expert

Trial Testimony of Jerald Udinsky, ¶ 18. In other words, DHS took the view that

the current Foster Care Maintenance Payment should be even less than the circa-

1990 payment rate of $529. As one State expert testified, the Foster Care

Maintenance Payment rate would not—and did not need to—put a roof over a

foster child’s head. Dkt. 293-3 (Plaintiffs’ Trial Brief, Exhibit 2 at PageID#:9026-

27). Now, as a result of the litigation and settlement, the federal Class will receive

the following benefits:

(1) Increases the monthly board reimbursement:

Ages Pre-Litigation Monthly Board Rate

Settlement Monthly Board

Rate 0-5 $529 $649

6-11 $529 $742 12+ $529 $776

(2) Increases in the annual clothing allowance:

Ages Pre-Litigation Clothing Allowance

Settlement Clothing

Allowance 0-5 $600

(+ $125 for special circumstances)

$810 6-11 $822 12+ $1026


6

(3) DHS must conduct periodic reviews of the monthly board rate and

clothing allowance, taking into account Hawaii’s cost of living and inflation;

(4) DHS must request additional money from the Legislature to increase the

board rates if Hawaii’s cost of living increases five percent or more; and

(5) DHS will suspend the 120 hour per month limit on Difficulty of Care

payments to families with special needs children, subject to a case by case

assessment.

Dkt. 386-3 (Amended Federal Settlement Agreement).

Class Counsel has worked on this matter for more than four years,

purely on a contingency basis. The recovery of any fees or costs was entirely

dependent on the degree of Plaintiffs’ success and the resulting application for and

award of fees and costs. Exhibit F at Dkt. 348-3 ¶5. Class Counsel could have

accepted non-contingency commercial work at far higher rates instead of pursuing

public interest litigation. Exhibit F at Dkt. 348-3 ¶6. Class Counsel fronted costs,

including hundreds of thousands of dollars in expert fees, deposition costs and

transcripts, and copying costs. Exhibit F at Dkt. 348-3 ¶13; Dkt. 348-4 ¶7;

Dkt. 348-5 ¶5. And, after the settlement failed, Class Counsel continued to expend

significant time preparing for the rescheduled trial and responding to inquiries

from notice recipients. Exhibits A-E. Class Counsel will continue to incur


7

additional time administering the settlement and responding to Class Members’

inquiries.

In sum, Class Counsel’s request for reduced fee award of $850,000.00

is manifestly reasonable, and more than warranted given the amount of work done,

the fees and costs incurred, and the significant benefits obtained for the Class. See

Declaration of Claire Wong Black at ¶¶9-13 (applying rates awarded by judges in

the District of Hawai`i to hours billed by key timekeepers through March 2017).

III. Service Awards to Named Plaintiffs Are Reasonable and Should Be Approved

The Named Plaintiffs have expended significant time and energy over

the past four years in order to prosecute this action, participating in the discovery

process, being subjected to insinuations of avarice in initiating this litigation,

preparing for trial twice, and participating in multiple settlement efforts. The

personal benefit to Named Plaintiffs from this action and the settlement is

coextensive with the benefit to all other class members because they will be

eligible to receive the higher foster board rates. See Aarons v. BMW of N. Am.,

LLC., Civ. No. 11-7667 PSF (CWX), 2014 WL 4090564, *18 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29,

2014) (the fact that class representatives will not receive benefits beyond other

class members weighs in favor of an award). As noted in Plaintiffs’ previous

motion for attorneys’ fees and service awards, the risks and difficulties

encountered by Named Plaintiffs Ms. Ah Chong and Mr. and Mrs. Sheehey were


8

significant. After the complaint was filed, Ms. Ah Chong received only one request

for placement of a foster child even though she had previously fostered over 100

children, many on an emergency basis. Mr. and Mrs. Sheehey were threatened with

a reduction in adoption assistance—which would have been a departure from

HDHS’ stated policy of paying the maximum board rate amount to adoptive

parents. See Dkt. 278 at PageID#:8330 (reduced adoption assistance) and Dkt. 144-

2 at PageID#:1682 ¶5 (stated adoption assistance policy).

For their considerable efforts and risks—including agreeing to be

named in the Complaint when other foster parents who supported the litigation

declined to participate publicly, fearing retaliation—service awards of $5,000 to

each of Ms. Ah Chong, Mrs. Sheehey, and Mr. Sheehey are more than reasonable.

Odrick v. UnionBanCal Corp., No. C10-5565 SBA, 2012 WL 6019495, *7 (N.D.

Cal. Dec. 3, 2012) ($5,000 service awards where settlement was reached early in

the litigation).

IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, and those stated in Plaintiffs’ prior motion,

Dkt. 348, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant Plaintiffs’ Renewed,

Unopposed Motion for Award and Approval of Amended Settlement Regarding

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, and Service Awards to Named Plaintiffs.


9

Dated: March 30, 2018

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Claire Wong Black VICTOR GEMINIANI GAVIN THORNTON PAUL ALSTON J. BLAINE ROGERS CLAIRE WONG BLACK MARC D. PETERS ALESSA Y. HWANG JAMES R. HANCOCK

Class Counsel





Plaintiffs, vs.


Defendant.

Case No. CV13-00663 LEK-KSC DECLARATION OF CLAIRE WONG BLACK

DECLARATION OF CLAIRE WONG BLACK

I, CLAIRE WONG BLACK, declare under penalty of perjury that the

following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:

1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing

(AHFI), and Class Counsel of record for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter.

2. I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ RENEWED,

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AWARD AND APPROVAL OF AMENDED SETTLEMENT

REGARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS, AND SERVICE AWARDS TO NAMED

PLAINTIFFS based on my personal knowledge. I am competent to testify about the

matters contained in this Declaration.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit “C” is a true and correct copy of

Itemization of Fees, reflecting and describing the services rendered and attorneys’

fees incurred for work performed by AHFI from April 13, 2017 to March 27, 2018,

in connection with the above-captioned matter—exclusive of work relating to the

Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 390-1 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 10730

2

settlement and responding to class inquiries regarding the settlement and class

notices, which are described below in paragraphs 4 and 5, and separately itemized

in Exhibits “D” and “E”.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit “D” is a true and correct copy of a

summary and Itemization of Fees, reflecting and describing services rendered and

attorneys’ fees incurred for work performed relating to settlement. In an exercise of

billing discretion, because AHFI is also Class Counsel in the State Action, the total

hours and fees AHFI incurred working on the settlement since Plaintiffs’ prior fee

motion have been prorated 50% each to the State Litigation and Federal Litigation.

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit “E” is a true and correct copy of a

summary and Itemization of Fees, reflecting and describing services rendered and

fees incurred for work performed relating to responding to class member inquiries

regarding the settlement, class notices, and—later—the failure of the settlement

and trial. In an exercise of billing discretion and based on my personal experience

responding to inquiries from class members, the total of number of hours and fees

have been prorated 90% to the State Litigation and 10% to the Federal Litigation.

The overwhelming majority of class members who called with questions about the

class notices were members of the State classes.

6. I have reviewed the fees for services rendered in this matter and

verify that, to the best of my knowledge, they are accurate. The fees are based on

timesheet entries made by the billing individuals identified in the invoices in the

course of regularly conducted business activities, at or near the time of the acts,

events, conditions or opinions described therein.

7. I have reviewed the time and charges in Exhibits “C” through

“E”. The fees incurred are reasonable and necessarily incurred.

8. In total AHFI expended 216.9 hours on this matter since the

failure of the 2017 settlement, amount to fees of $49,189.50.


3

9. In addition, I have reviewed the time and charges set forth in

Plaintiffs’ prior UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AWARD AND APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

REGARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND SERVICE AWARDS, Dkt. 348 (the “2017

Motion”). Based on my review and certain hypothetical adjustments, described

below, Plaintiffs’ request for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs of $850,000.00

is a fraction of the fees and costs incurred.

10. I undertook an analysis of only the fees incurred as of the 2017

Fee Motion and did not consider the fees incurred since the failure of the

settlement. I then applied rates actually awarded by judges within the U.S. District

of Hawai`i to counsel and paralegals with approximately similar years of

experience as the counsel and paralegals in this action) to the total hours billed by

AHFI, Morrison Foerster, and Hawaii Appleseed main timekeepers only. In other

words, I did not consider hundreds of hours of time billed by any law clerk,

paralegal, or attorney who devoted less than 75 hours to this action.

11. Based on the hypothetical adjustments described in paragraph

10 (which Plaintiffs do not concede are appropriate or consistent with Ninth

Circuit jurisprudence regarding attorneys’ fees in civil rights cases), the adjusted

fees incurred up through the filing of the 2017 Fee Motion would be

$1,417,965.19. This hypothetical amount does not take into account $276,737.63

of incurred costs, and hundreds of hours of time billed and value conferred by

other timekeepers who assisted in this matter. Nor does it take into account more

than $200,000.00 in fees incurred since the failure of the 2017 settlement.

12. In other words, the agreed-upon award of $850,000.00 is a

fraction of the amount to which Class Counsel is entitled.

13. A summary of my calculations and the authorities supporting

the adjusted, hypothetical rates applied follows.


Attorney/

Paralegal

Hours

Billed

Billed

Rate

Adjusted

Rate

Amount at

Awarded

Rates Authority for Adjusted Rates Years

P. Alston 200.6 $695 $592.52 118,859.51

Alston for 2012‐13 work, ERK v. State

("ERK"), attached at Dkt.348‐11

PageID#:10318

40+

years

C. Black 1841.5 $225 $225 414,337.50

Lee, also admitted in 2006, in Liberty

Mutual Ins. V. Sumo‐Nan, Civ. No. 14‐

00520 DKW‐KSC, 2017 WL 810277

(Mar. 1, 2017) 7‐11 yrs

K.

Guadagno 63.9 $125 7,987.50

$125 actual rate awarded to Kelly

Guadagno in ERK

20+

years

I. Takane 89.1 $125 11,137.50 Same as K. Guadagno

20+

years

G. Thornton 175.4 $240 $240 42,096.00

Higher $260 rate held to be

"manifestly reasonable" for attorney

first admitted in 2001, Civil Beat Law

Center for the Public Interest v.

Centers for Disease Control , Civ. No.

16‐00008 JMS‐KSC, 2017 WL 664446

(Jan. 31, 2017)

adm.

2002

A.C.

Johnston 452.75 $995 $592.52 268,263.43 Same as P. Alston

40+

years

J. Kanada 829.25 $690 $225 186,581.25 same rate as C. Black

6‐9

years

J. Hancock 1091.5 $385 $200 218,300.00

$200 awarded to attorney with 6

years of experience at time of fee

award, Liberty Mutual Ins. V. Sumo

Nan , Civ. No. 14‐00520 DKW‐KSC,

2017 WL 810277 (Mar. 1, 2017)

3‐7

years

B. DePuy 99.5 $650 $200 19,900.00 Same as J. Hancock 5 yrs

P. Day 93.75 $575 $175 16,406.25

$175 awarded to attorney with 5

years' experience at time of fee

award, Du Preez v. Banis , Civ. No. 14‐

00171 LEK‐RLP, 2017 WL 6523162

(Oct. 18, 2017)

4 yrs at

the time

A. Hwang 283.25 $595 $175 49,658.75 Same as P. Day 4 yrs

D.

Visitacion 88.25 $310 $125 11,031.25 Same as K. Guadagno 12 yrs

J. Catancio 374.5 $300 $125 46,812.50 Same as K. Guadagno 17 yrs

N. Hoang 52.75 $270 $125 6,593.75 Same as K. Guadagno 9 yrs

1,417,965.19


CWB

Typewritten Text

CWB

Typewritten Text

4

CWB

Typewritten Text

5

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and

correct.

Executed in Honolulu, Hawai`i on March 30, 2018.

/s/ Claire Wong Black CLAIRE WONG BLACK


CWB

Typewritten Text




Plaintiffs, vs.


Defendant.

Case No. CV13-00663 LEK-KSC DECLARATION OF MARC DAVID PETERS

DECLARATION OF MARC DAVID PETERS

I, MARC DAVID PETERS, declare under penalty of perjury that the

following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge:

1. I am a partner with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, and

Class Counsel of record for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter.

2. I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion

for Award and Approval of Amended Settlement Regarding Attorneys’ Fees and

Service Awards based on my personal knowledge, unless otherwise stated. I am

competent to testify about the matters contained in this Declaration.

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Morrison

Foerster LLP’s fees reflecting and describing the services rendered and attorneys’


fees incurred for work performed by Morrison & Foerster LLP from the end of

March 2017 through March 2018 in connection with this matter.

4. I have reviewed the fees for services rendered by Morrison & Foerster

LLP in this matter and verify that, to the best of my knowledge, they are accurate.

The fees are based on timesheet entries made by the billing individuals identified

in the invoices in the course of regularly conducted business activities at or near

the time of the acts described therein.

5. I have reviewed the time and charges set forth in Exhibit “B”. The

fees incurred are reasonable and were necessarily incurred for this matter.

6. In total, Morrison & Foerster LLP expended 272.5 hours on this

matter since the failure of the 2017 settlement, amounting to fees of $193,000.00.

7. The hourly rates used to calculate this total amount are the rates that

Morrison & Foerster LLP bills its paying clients.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed in Palo Alto, California on March 30, 2018.

MARC DAVID PETERS


IN THE LTNTTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI'I

PATRICIA SHEEHEY, PATRICI(SHEEHEY, RAYNETTE AHCHONG, individually and on behalf ofthe class of licensed foster careproviders residing in the state ofHawai'i,

Plaintiffs,

Case No. CVl3-00663 LEK-KSC

DECLARATION OFGAVIN THORNTON

VS

PANKAJ BHANOT, in his officialcapacity as the Director of the Hawai'iDepartment of Human Services,

Defendant.

DECLAR.ATTON OF GAVIN THORNTON

I, GAVIN THORNTON, declare that:

1. I am the eo-executive director of the Hawaii Appleseed Center

for Law and Economic Justice (Hawaii Appleseed, formerly Lawyers for Equal

Justice). I am licensed to practice before this Court and I am Class Counsel of

record for Plaintiffs in this action.

2. I make this declaration based on my personal knowledge and

am competent to testify to the matters discussed herein.

3" Attached hereto as Exhibit 6(^" is a true and eorreet copy ofHawaii Appleseed's fees, reflecting and describing the services rendered and

attorneys' fees and costs incurred for work performed by Hawaii Appleseed from

N{arch 6,2017 through VIarch 20IB in connection with the above*eaptioned matter.

I0l4442vl


4. I have reviewed Hawaii Appleseed's fees for services rendered

in this matter and verify that, to the best of rny knowledge, they are accurate. The

fees are based on timesheet entries made by the billing individuals identifîed in the

invoices in the course of regularly conducted business activities at or near the tirne

of the acts described therein.

5. I have reviewed the tirne and charges set forth in Exhibit " & ".The fees incurred are reasonable and were necessarily incurred in this lawsuit.

6. I{awaii Appleseed has spent a total of 33 attorney hours

working on this action. The amount of attorneys' fees Hawaii Appleseed has

incurued to date is $7,920.00.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and

comect.

Executed in Honolulu, Hawai'i on March 30, 2018.

.+' t::_" ' ''' . -............1.......:,

GAVIN TIJORNTON

21O14442v) / I 1t436-I


Ah Chong v. Wong , CV13-00663 LEK-KSC

Sheehey v. State of Hawaii , 14-1-I709-08 VLC

DATE TIME DESCRIPTION

3/6/2017 0.1 Email with co-counsel regarding stats conference and fees negotiations

3/7/2017 0.5 Emails with co-counsel regarding fees negotiations; review and analyze fees discount options

3/8/2017 0.6 Review and revise settlement conference; emails with co-counsel regarding same

3/9/2017 0.2 Emails with co-counsel regarding fees negotiations

3/13/2017 0.4 Review draft motion for preliminary approval of settlement

3/15/2017 0.1 Emails with co-counsel regarding draft motion for preliminary approval of settlement

3/15/2017 1.4Review budget and strategize regarding legislative approval of settlement; emails with co-counsel

regarding same

3/16/2017 0.3 Review and sign settlement agreement

3/17/2017 0.3 Research legislation related to settlement approval

3/17/2017 0.1 Emails with co-counsel regarding timing of settlement approval

3/28/2017 0.4 Review, revise and sign declaration supporting unopposed fees motion

4/14/2017 0.3 Work on strategy for legislative approval of settlement; emails with co-counsel regarding same

4/17/2017 2.3 Work on strategy for legislative approval of settlement; emails with co-counsel regarding same

4/18/2017 2.1 Calls to class members regarding legislative approval of settlement issues

4/21/2017 0.1 Call with P. Alston regarding legislative approval of settlement issues

4/24/2017 0.3 Emails with opposing counsel and co-counsel regarding no appropriation for settlement

4/27/2017 1.3 Work on strategy for funding of settlement

4/27/2017 1 Review draft motion for settlement fairness hearing; confer with co-counsel regarding same

4/28/2017 0.2 Emails with co-counsel regarding strategy for settlement funding

4/28/2017 0.7 Calls with class representatives regarding settlement status

5/1/2017 0.1 Emails with co-counsel regarding strategy for settlement funding

119 Merchant Street, Ste 605A

Honolulu, Hawai`i, 96813

Tel: (808) 587-7605

Date: March 30, 2018

EXHIBIT A




March 30, 2018


5/2/2017 0.6 Correspond with class representatives regarding legislative refusal to approve settlement

5/2/2017 0.8 Confer with co-counsel regarding settlement strategy

5/11/2017 0.3 Review joint status report draft and email with co-counsel regarding same

5/12/2017 0.2 Review revised joint status report draft and email with co-counsel regarding same

5/15/2017 0.7 Work on strategy for funding of settlement

5/18/2017 0.6Strategize regarding funding settlement during possible special session; emails with co-counsel

regarding same

5/23/2017 0.5Strategize regarding funding settlement during possible special session; emails with co-counsel

regarding same

8/9/2017 0.3 Work on strategy for legislative approval of settlement during special session

8/11/2017 0.8Develop plan for special session push for legislative approval of settlement; emails with co-counsel

regarding same

8/16/2017 0.6Caculate additional inflation adjustment on most recently adopted foster payment rates and email

C. Wong Black regarding same.

8/18/2017 3.4Work on plan for special session push for legislative approval of settlement; emails with co-counsel

regarding same; draft state on settlement and need for approval

8/19/2017 0.3Emails with co-counsel regarding implementing plan for special session push for legislative approval

of settlement

8/21/2017 0.3 Finalize statement on settlement and need for approval

8/22/2017 0.9 Call and email with class representative regarding push for settlement approval in special session

9/21/2017 1 Prep and attend conference call with co-counsel regarding case strategy

10/26/2017 0.2 Review draft notice to class regarding no settlement

1/11/2018 0.2 Emails with team regarding settlement potential

1/11/2018 0.4 Prep for and attend settlement conference

1/17/2018 0.7 Conference call with co-counsel regarding case strategy; follow up

1/23/2018 0.4 Attend final pretrial conference and prep

2/8/2018 0.3 Review settlement agreement revisions

2/9/2018 0.5 Calls with class representatives regarding settlement status

2/14/2018 0.5 Prep for, attend and debrief from status conference

2/16/2018 0.4 Discussions with co-counsel regarding settlement

Page 2 of 3




March 30, 2018


2/22/2018 0.8 Team call regarding settlement offer

2/22/2018 1.4 Draft settlement proposal and correspondence with co-counsel regarding same

2/26/2018 1.1 Team call regarding settlement offer; draft counter offer

2/27/2018 0.3 Emails with team regarding counter offer

2/28/2018 1 Review settlement correspondence and attend conference call with team

3/2/2018 0.3 Emails with co-counsel regarding settlement

3/5/2018 0.4 Attend settlement conference/discussion

33$240.00 $7,920.00

Rate (all hours GKT)Hours

TOTAL

FEE TOTALS

Page 3 of 3


-ocfõPcAJ

EOJ

LocOJ

PcoECJ

Foþ¡.=-orUb¡qJ

õ6Cf,oU(ob¡(JOJ-:(õ-

L

=Ø>Gl='-toPQLOJBU

EE.9 -occJo>o 'r=ETEOJ;Fp

On|.'roo$

cO

(U

bo,EEñÞoq.)

c.9PoE

3.0J

Eai.- çpË.=øEb¡É-o(l)

PCJtoL7 -v.'oo :qJU

"YroTAJ;rõ -C

-P0J '=gsAJL(J q)cçoJc-oOC(JP i,ôØ-=OJLLt!:or<669>L

4ç

boG)P

P

PcAJ

EOJ

POJ

b¡

o(EooOJL

qJ(JcOJ

OJ

c(JOJ

iËo

I(o

Pc

þo.Eç-oOJP(oqJ

-Õc(o

b¡c'c(oOJ

-c

qJc'õ

orgr(gõØ-c o¡UCrA .:o9

õoo¡P(U

oc=ruYcJtPpoJlo(oL(JE_ØÈor=Jçoc()Obo(J

o(UOzOO>o-GJ oJ

c-)Õú.õ

cOJ

EOJoLÞ¡(o

cqJ

Eo

qJØCJN

->toc

ñOboc==!AJ

-cC,)

Ec(tr

QJ

(oEoJoØ(o(Jb¡.c-oLrUb¡CJL

EñOJPOJØtoO

-c=3!coo_q.)L

oUOeOLNç-l

LôNo

boclo

=T

-cE3qJçco

ËloqJPOJ

ft()_c

==!coo-v)OJLLo(JL'CJELoì.9CJÉ.

OqOLnst

b¡qJ

(Þ

P

OJ

(o(J

15c(o

f,(orØl

CroJlErCJ,P,PI(uiØ;bolClõiLlcolbolcJlLl

l

trlrolc.)PqJØlo(J

-cE3dJsco(J-oc(E-oco6OJLLo(J

OJ

f(o

.2b¡qJ

OJ

(o

-oþo.EEcfçoECJP(oqJL

CJ

cOJ-ocoÈOJ

o(J

=OJ'tOJú.

OqOLn(o

OOOOddoco(os

OcC)cOs

OOdrfisf

O4(\(oFl

LN\O

c),rnq:\rlO

OOO I-.)

rlO

tñtOF-:tnOrO

Lôc]O

(9>

=TÞrç-{ONc\Ln

:ZVU(J-oolUU=zz).<<YT.T.Z.=

tnCfú'

-t^t^\aevA>>>LL{=<<-¿--a

vU--o=.(Ju

a?T.Za/),n

gea2 r.Jr >sãí

Nr-FrFl r1 F-lOOO(\c!N@cOçla\N-\-\ -\ t¡S sf ,

ItrilO(\rn(\<'

vUOø1(Jd-zu)-L3h!-Lâ.-¿.-tf¡',^ï(=ú.t^> < Lr-.]g>añ ¡-.r..] ç{OO(\ (\F l--c\ c!sl .\t

>¿UOt¡udzlü<l-:I^

É. c)

¿.<<5t\ l-rJilOO(\ (\Ln r¡r\ (\sfr9

_cP'= qi

õfqcbooc(J'-

EqJco_(oO-o qJ

cob¡OCØ=(UYl- GJ

b¡õEeu=Øo'-(J qJ

soi(g

3õo- r¡'oËì c.t

Èoõcõc>.e9(o(UË.ì-Ð(Jõ9zRöäPoL-ÕçL

=(odrtr!LcF

õI o.'-aP'= 0Ji)HÉ.()

cco

_cF(9:oc(o

-:¿()(o

co

U-c.=3Ecoo-ØCJ

o()äf#(oP

OJrhrgObo.=PØõ:lb¡xoJXbo o-cá,rõYIs< 'õo

-c 0JP-'= þo>CL=crC:ro,59

to:(o

o

LPocØo--CõF6trEbò

c=roñ5--P

3<Iooco*d--crhP

3='- Lãor¡5C-Oõu

rcçt (O0J-(I)Y

çLLOoo-

CJi-,8, O

Ot)CJ

cJ>äN

rIl b¡õ=L.= c '15

!';3.ä-o EnrcØùõ(oL'; c.¡ .9qJ .9 cJÉ.>ô-

LoçcoFoEcc(o

CJ

qJô-joçc.9(o.9a-o_õCJ(J'=

(E_coo-þocEL(oboCJ

(Jocñ-;.l3AJ;r^: c-)õe

ro(J

;P

lÞ

EEc(o

LoþØE- U.:: _:¿L LqJoË3trqØ:JqJoc.J _C

-oE-P- U

PqrorúUf>à(JoJ roC(JL

9EËroZdJ

QiaJ+trvoPpLjJO(!?=qJ

,CJ

:.uc .->õø?>foJoÉ.u

_.cv-õ

õeEõoLJo ::

.:6u;JgrEo)--qJoØ:()Þ¡(õo)E9e äo_.b¡Øõ9

-Oço cì{ro.9roaJhcoE'E ucL-roo=3y'-0J ¿^ -=

o--oç9oc=\,

tilstrË-..,-dV)I b

^ÀEP.:qEO(oOJCJLPe(-J.Y(o-;Ãõcco:!(U-.Y

(UCPö:oqLø(JC€=Eec(uØ.=H>>ø:/(Þ(U-LlbOL'lf-O)L-!3ã;PrEaË-e (o cJ ìuF-)¿rC¿CJËNú.o-ü<

OJ

EØ'b¡lc,õlob¡ìCJL

-:¿ I

(J

oU:c:(9.

=;oLn

ñOOì

_cE3(U

cU

oØc=oU(E

o

-o3.9qJL

o+P

ro_c

ØCJOJçõc(o

PØo(J

-ÕGJPrÞ-oo-f,qJ

o-CJ

o_-oc(o

=OJ

CJú.

OqOLNIt-

C)qOr/)cl

Inc\

OqoOIt-ñ

O'Jlr\(or--{

OLn

l'roor

OqOLôl-r

OqOLN(o

Ln

.j

L.9PCLL:It^(,oC'POrcq):Ei=

P'f,Lo3L.rLoB

l-rrlO(\f--C\cO

zLIJïU

IZZo;q<9Êna-!=><rl-.. l--c-l \-lOOa\ c\ltttrr(\ r\ao co

LllJJ

O L¡J

EcÊo>2 t/):¿<þÔ(¡)ÐfitÕLoI

Lôclç-l

VUoUz-ú.

LIJ

OLN

+

:¿UoUzTú.

tlJ

r--ç-lOc!\rC\

<.

Èrr{Oa{$rl\f

l--rlOa.lco(\cO

(,

=,ïF.ïl'O(\\\]ooN

l--ç-lO(\(\co

LN.'lO

LNì(\Oqrl

Ln\N

:ZU8ú

Iã- ?-1-)27i^-''.' U -nûl)z

E;ÉÈ¿=a,14{ò=ã

EXHIBIT B


AJtJcCJLqJçco(J

=(o

õc(ú

OJ

Efõ

E

JQ(o

co

ü_c.=ìLAJ+go(JOJ

f,-oOJ

-cØ(!'Ë

alc(o

jb¡ofû

vìPcOJ

Eo-oq.)

q)EqJØ(U(,)

b¡.gE(ob¡qJ

Þ¡cto

=I

rc'cfú

AJPqJ

ô_

_c,.P_

ìb¡.c

CJ'-f c.J

EqJOJtr-cu-oØc-o oJ

ro(oàö-OE(ooJõ -Ìì>Ø(o_

-i(E.g '-

bOp,cE!cLCJ(oPffË-CL o.¡(!ØqJcP(g

-cïtì>E' -c

3Bo)

.cooUU

b¡.=-oL(ob¡CJg

b¡c(o

=:E

-oclocqJ

c(oI-_i

-cE3Ecoo-qJ

o()¿ÀcoP(tr

=(Jro

LqJo_X"i-cJCJ=N J>E.uYc--

(o'-b¡cFOJ

bo.=EtoboOJL

OJOcqJLqJ

coUCJ

ru('J

Þ¡.!EoQo_:foP

-lf,CJPtoqJL

OJUcCJEcoa-CJLLo(J

=c)'tGJú.

C)qOOLô.ì

f--ç-lOr\lOìç-l(o

=CJzbo.c-oL(oÞoCJ

cf,--cf3

ço

-.:¿Qlo

oCJborcCJ

o(J.g-oOJ

EoPÌoCJ

õCJ

:.UrhcfoU(o(Jo

EoþqJQco-o þ¡cco=Ø=aJ .:

oc()aJ}E.q qr

>=cJ ;,rØ

qJ

.EcJ(oõPØ.=b¡p.SõE; boLOJÑLb¡-CJÈ

JOJ(JP.oaJcoH(J

_c-CPP'-

=7õõ-çRõ6taoi!F. cõroc¡ ic9õLOOØo_ 0J(I)l'..

;3X (1.)

;¡ b¡oJ lobo cJc>'=OP(J(olñbol =E3-ciE(J

=,soi .YØ>CJ CJÉ. ú.

_ØCJ

fP(u

.2b¡o

Foc.)ö¡(E

OJ

o(JØCJ

o-oP-o

OJP(OPgE=E)Y c-)::oJ:bou(õu*Ucrotr-QJLPoqL U+ØCJ OJO_CCP(u-õ,ÈU^øiJ(U ..LOoc(J_

lõ.e :ø>(JCJ OJÉ.7

PcCJ

Eq.,

CJ

b¡.=-ofob¡OJ

-Y(J(õ

cô

Q'r:'c(Þ

ooc(o>P

I¡¡

<E-cJ

=P.!P3gL

^, onSL

ocUrob¡

= c.)(o_-ce(JCLoñô C")

õieúËôoroE(JO_EoñoJ3õOJE'5ocJcÉ.õ

õc=o(J

I

oQ

-c.g3

-ocoo-ØqJLL

U

õØc:Jo(J

I

o(J-cv3Ecoo-ØqJL

L)

oqOl.r)ç-t

P

oo_QJLq

(ÞP

Pc'õç(oL

!3OJ

q.)

ú.

OqO<fr!

LÔ:c.liO:

OJ

EruØþ¡c

(ob¡o

(J(õ

õboco

=U-cE3Ecoo-ooC)

-ocro

P

(U

E

oa-CJ

:i(o

.=o3OJ'5qJÉ.

OqLnNco

O,]]O

EPcCJPoaJa-EE(Dcø(ELØ.olPOJlogP(OØO_cJ (u.ØLrõ O-u .-lb¡>Eðro(Jbo vtE-o-v lt() lo.loo(J txccJSbo

9rtt!b¡tu o)

L

0J P b-OØL-cerolos>TOJ2

LT-:----c o- -o.P-xcìqrroFì fl.ñË+ eE á.äCJJ-

=oLP<o6¿u+¡-orcÈ(U'=õE5:0rboJ=io.l¡OF õ(J .

OOLNOñld(olo.r I .r)

ì

l

I

.!LNO(\ Ln

dc;l

PcCJ

E(uP]plolØl

Fio:Øift

ProP6b.oc-õLtõbo0,JL

OJ(J

CJ-olcloìo-lvl:OJIL1o

qJ,çl(orø'OiqO(OO)

b¡.gE!(oo¡AJ

CJ(JcqJLqJ+coQOJ()

iËoroL

.=;boOJ

(o

cCJ

ECJPqJ

Þo.=þtoboCJL

CJUcCJ

OJ

co(J

AJco

_co_qJ

c)F

iocIt

CJ

o(J.9-cfPLCJo-XCJ

Þoc

(ob¡(U

-:¿

ño_

=

=oõ+oPEco(o

bìcFoqJ

EEftt ^iAJ;P(EAJO2b¡U L'=¡(l)

PO'2v

OqOt].)l--

CJçcoC)

äòc'-roq.)

-cb¡.=EoUo-f,b¡.g-ct

boCJ

s.c(JOItr'-coõ

boU.=-; cr

lro-OLCOopã.ocJFs -:¿L Loo(J>

cCJ

c(oïj-c.!3Ec

O, Ori*i(t)iqJì

aJ oiú ,Q:

Oq(\(os-{

'4N](o,r+i

O'J.)c\

O'4O

OO

OqOOcO

OIJìñl(oFl

OqoLnFl

OqOLôF{

OqOO(o

LnN

LÔc!

C)qLr)Nm

OLlO

OqOtr)sl

OOLnOc.l O(o Lnr-l r{

..1Lô]Lô.{ic{

'l'O.O

Ol¡sf

r¡IO

Lôa\O

i

i

LN(\lO

l

LÕNd

Oqrl

Lnc]O

r¡c]O

Oqr-l

LNc.|r-l

:¿(-)oUzT¿\nLI-J

vU-Y rr-t

- -)-AYfz.=^=4Y=ula>rrJ>sãíl-- l--F-l rlOOc\ a!oo o'ìFl Fl

(o (o

v.U-I u-r2J-a9T.Z

,n4Y=yia>LJJ>4J2ì<r'ì|tt l--ç-l F-{OO(\ (\cn oor-l r-{(o (o

zLU

-(JIz

=<9ea3=<=l--T-jOc\(o(\Ln

:v.:¿(JrUooU t(Jzz-Tú. ú.rn rntIJ LIJ

l--rlO(\LnNLn

It-c-lOc\cO(\Ln

lzLU]T.(Jz<Yea3=<T

VQo(Jzïú.tntiJ

l-rrlO(\t--rlLN

>ZUoUz-ú.rnLU

It-F-lac\(or-lLn

V(Jo(JzIú.tnLU

l--rlOc!rnr-lr¡

\nÉ.LlJFLLJô_

ciUú.

l--ç-lOC\(\r-lLñ

(97

=TIt-çlO(\rlF-l

rn

:z:L!:Ï(J

.tzttnv)LUJ

:.:¿ vU-- L)Ø= o= oú.= u* (JL!¿-L-h? a9 alz r.z -?.<9ii9i&A<-ü.i a-<LLl>>u..1 >>>ãígãíg

l--çlOc\lcO

r¡

r-rç-lOc!cO

LN

It-r-lor\(\Lô

>¿(Jo(Jz-É.tnLU

::ll-rçlo(\c!Lô

l--r{Oa!o)r_l

Ln

r-- F-ç-l ç-lOO(\ (\\\ \\<sfLN LN


4.,'

Ê(o

b¡.EELloboAJL

CJPOJo-

-cI3o

(L)

U¿:-. ØO¡P (lJoP¡ IIJ

-oJ(U'- -CTOcJ (õ!cJo- cJb¡L

EpLO

sg(L)-_CJ

-:¿ q

(úeõf,: o\J -o-CLvo3iOJ(o

õE(J O_

OJçlo

oo

-o(ob¡qJL

(UUcCJ

OJçcoUOJ

i.Ë

oI

tg

.cPGJbo

!=_oOtrlll-b¡.g:ofiJo¡OJ

qJUcqJ

-oc-ub¡o- cJ

oroOØocJ3HOJQ'5aaJcÉ.õ

vìcoF.oCfúL

(U-cjo .ro 0Jo-P=õ. C C.)

>'9 :aUõp

ØL

õcU'Øqrö oP

^- JUbOoJPCØ(o

'-lñ UÍu=(5boIbo-ìU_L U

Lt

<u i'" ,9b¡ ;ioYc9, -v. .9PH õccôEiJ,r þo>-o-.! ,;:qJ>ij(oL¿a)b¡EE.O9 -rEO;-c\o:!.).9EqtiqJoro0Jd(JOÉ.

oOJô-

-c=3-ocoo-oLo

(_)

EõCJ

OJ

(o(J

-c.=

=!co-ØOJ

OOqOu)ç-l

Lnlc-{

:

O,

PcqJ

ECJ

CJØ

oqJ

:ñçbo.=:o(ob¡CJ

(u(J

oPqJ

,()PocEqJ

oo_oo-

=.qJ

CJú.

-c!3PUto

co(JECrg

AJ

-oroCJcbo.cEL(ob¡OJ

-c(J(gOJ

OqOOco

"ì

OJ()cOJ

CJ

coØf(E

b¡,cEt!boOJ

ç(oOJ

o(oC)

-cÈ

=(õCJ(JcGJLCJ\Fco(J.E

P(oo-'õFL(!o- >.

bD

E.9llt ro

Oø-.oL:

uo-OLCô-(o

o.)

.gE(DOJ-oboc

-oL(oboAJL

_c(J(öq.)

¿t5P(oPØ(uØñQo¡cõtob¡CJ

c3Lco

-;-c.=3Ecoo_Øa)Loc)()qOLNç-1

rJ)Nd

VUo(Jz-ú.

L!

Itrç-lo(\or-lOr-l

OJf

.qOJPõOJo_o-(o

b¡.sioroboCJ

_cULroooú.

OcOøÈ-

rf).!r-l

\ZOo()zIÉ.IJILU

Ì-rFlO(\¡co(\¡

Ot

cocL

_cF(9!clo

r¿(J(o

cob¡co

(JJ(Joc(!--;-ØfroOJ qJPO0J^o-lE

-:o¿.c_ClU

ì.ËEÈg¿>beLtt(uL

FPCØoÞo(JC

ì-OJ(ÞPbnäE

-Y(Jtoco

U-CE=-(fcoo-rJlc.)LLo(JqJ'

'õ

.Ett1ôJco!Ecrroi9óGJLtoooJØ(J

3'õbo=ã ,¡räqffcoL.PrEo-oqrdô-'cJ<¿.--õEØ'= b¡>CL=

.): s¿ro:b¡.q oJ

-:¿(J(g

co(J-oc(o

coPco-ct--

IEv3Ecoa-CJ

oU

(o'(Jr-oc(o

cÕØq.)

CJ,.>;(o

7o¡o

EQo)o-

bol=tõ:(oo¡o)

O

OOm

vlb¡.=çìqJ';c)L

ôb¡c.TñOJ

-cPcG)(Jq)Lbo.=EL(Eboo

EIEqJPCJVI(õ(J

_cE3osco(J

c(o'uco

OJ

o(J

OqOLnil

Lo

F

.t_õ

sñ(o

EcroCJ(JcOJLOJsco

f(oP

bo.g!IDÞoCJL

Eõo

!clÎJ

õvtcfo()ñ(Jo-c.!3

-oco:ôlõã()CJL-

,59

boc(o

3T<-c.:3LqJçco(JäcõqJPqJ

(o

-c.=3Ecoo-CJ

o(J

=o(JEoþOJõo

iÕcrovtOJP

ooP-oc(u#

AJ

Eto

b¡.c-o(ob¡CJL

Qo(Jc(!I

-c.!

=OJçcoU

-oc(o

CJ

-oE(u

EØtoO

EoLc.)

PCJ

ob¡.gi.-3OJ'=CJú

CJ

cqJLCJ

c(J

fPro

P

Þo.=:o(ob¡CJ

õcfoQ

GoEoL

OJ()CCJ-oco-OJ

o(J3OJ'5qJúO4(\(oç-i

OJ

cOJ

OJ+coøfñ

bo.cEL(oÞoOJ

oQcoOJçco(JOJ()

i¡=

oI

fo

boc=E(u-c(J

CJ

ß()oP

EcCJ

OqO(\l--

CJ

fPloPØq.)ØñQEc(o

OJP(!'tf,

G.CP

=CJcbo.=EL(oboAJL

qJ

ct!-

-c.=3

!coo_qJL

U

vUo(Jz-É.

IJJ

l-rç-lo(\c\(\O)

Eq):-PCJ

-:¿OoEEcñLCJ-ooP:JoU3OJ'tL

öô,Fq)G)

EE(oo

!cP

OqOstç-l

Oulr-l

côÉ.:LU]F.LUô-;ciUÉ.

ã1l'rç-lON-\FlN

rlt

P(oPrn(uØ

EroØb¡.EEg(oboCJL

't5coo-CJLL

(J

ö.9PocØ(g()O'tCJÉ.

OqOON

OqO(Oo)

OOqqOOl.r)Orl (O

OOOOool.r)<f,ç-l C!

LNONOOci

Lô INa\ (\

i

l

OqOrnç-l

r-.)c.!O

l'-F-lONO)

ç-lr{

¡rFiOr\O')

ç-lr-{

l--r-lO(\-ìç-lï{

V)É.LUt---tri

to-tâ

I-Jú.

xilOr\-\(o(\O

:¿(JoUzrú.r!)LJJ

|-\rlOc{(oc!Orl

vUo(Jz-¿L!

¡..F-lO(\ilrl

Or-l

:Z(JoC)zïú.

LU

-:lf-.FlOa\¡

rlr\Cll

zIJJï(J

Iz;<98A!=<:tr

¡rl-lONç-l(\O)

v,Qo(JzTú.LAI,JJ

ñ,rtro.(\L/')rl

O)

vU-8É=.+-zol ) ,.,n4Y":, gAì31a<-

trr-lO(\Lôç-l

O)

l-rçlOc!coç-l

co

OqOcosf

Ot?a

OqOLNr{

LDc!d

OqOO

Oqr-l

OqOt.r')(o

OqFl

LôNd

C)4c!(or..l

Lnc\

OqOLnrl

OqOLnFl

LôNd

OLôd

otr)c\(orl

r-l

Oq(\

Oqrl

Oqan

rôc\d

Ln(\LNclO

LN

Io

:Z(JoUzïú.rJ)LIJ

l--t-lOc!o)ri(\r{

tt)úL!FUJo-

c;(JÉ

It-ç-lOc\¡

dr-la\¡ç-l

>zvU(-)ooUUzzIIÉ. É.rn tnLLJ LU

vvU(JOOtn(J (J ê(zz9<<l;-J-rdÉÉÒvt ttt !\tJJ LIJ Y¿.¿.<<<=

v:l(J (JooUUzz-Tú. ú.

LU Ld

f-. ltç-l riOONc{o(o\-'l -\'\ C!rl r-l.{

f\ l--rl r-lOOc! c!\\ \-ao Lna! \\

t\ Þt(o

z tzL! L¡JÏI(JU

l¡zz;;<9<9aaSa3=38<r<-r.rç-lOC\aOc\(o

l--ç-lo(\r-l(\(.o

(,/)É.LIJFL¡Jo_

ciUú.

It-r-lO(\O')r-l(o


OJØcfo(J

-c.!3c.9P(o.9c5EEo(J-ocIU

õCJo-o-ñ

oP

=()oG)

.=

oçcooE

E

o

Lñ\corlLôç-l

LOc!r\

>¿UoUzI¿LU

corlO(\Lô(\ç{

-Vro

co

t)-ctìEco-OJ

o()ôco,PoEEOJPlÞqJLr5c(o

LqJ

o().9!(o{=cOJPoo-b¡.gELtob¡L

_c(J(uAJqOJÉ.

(o

Po3-:';tOJL(O

0J-FOJüPb¡eöo.=L-Ob¡ñnr b¡I c.,

OJL(J-c-U9rh"-, CJÈøcoJOLUCJL() :0.)!oO(JroL-õPc 1-'i

toç(õcJ=ä(o(E ,Ë

L :Oo 'x=o.=

-lõhc;à

o- qJ

oLE-.oftJ=þ6U

'-ØLo¡õn-liL.o 'i o- -õts p.ts ËLiõfobogEò9

LN(-.1

(oOLÔ

LN\C)

:ZUoQzïú.

L¡J

coFlONst(\F-l

OqOOC)^aO

oqco

\nú.L!FL!o-

c;UÉ.

corlOC\cO

(\ C\t\

-\

il ç-l

b¡cFoloOJ

co{=oEq.,

.9OJ

þc(o

3.qJ

qJ

l4'(oCJo-o-

oPf(JoEO

.çbo.sõrõboOJ

_cLrUOJ

o(obôq.)

-J

Lrgcçf

(o

!Ø-qJ

.=:o(uo

Eb¡

EtõuoOJL

-c(JL(oCJ

rqJ

äÀc(o

jCJro _cgþ¡rE -O

:äo:or=LUL

CJôc"bäEC-ft

õ ñ L

.9 üiõþCJL

38EOOc4O l--Ln coN(OcO ç-l

OnN

VUo(JzI¿L!

ooç-lOc\-\co

Lô(-!cô

rnÉ.t-!FLIJô_

UL.)É.

ooF-lONc\Nrl

oocPØOJfãa.)

c.9oEAJ

';qJ

-oc(D

=CJ'tCJ

õOJo_

(D

Lof(Jo=OJP

.=bo,c-oL(EÞ¡(U

-cLloqJ

OJ

(ob¡CJ

J

(U

E(o

Þo,cEtoboqJL

_c(J

(oqJ

OJ

rÞboCJ

-i-^(oCJo-o_(E

oP

=Uoo.gÞ!.ccLõþoqJL

OJ()cOJLOJþco(JOJco-ca-OJ

G.)

FOqOC)ñ

aq(\

V,æ.LUFL!ô-

U(JÉ.

cor-l(\rlF-l

oE(oU)

b¡.=cLtuboa.)

!coo_qJ

o

E(õq.)

osoo-o-toÞo.=ELtoboo-c(J(oa.J

CJÉ.

u)\oo(or-l

Lôc\

vUo(JzTú.

IJJ

oo coçi çJAONN\\ -\co otç-l ç-l

F-l r-l

OJPOJ

o_

L

c.9(tr

.Qo-o-(o

OJ

'=

(g-c

o_oPõcOJPP(o

reoo-o-lo

LoPfo=qJP.=

oçc.9P

E

IU

ôlr)cl(oLNoo

-ì'ì-_'

rn rJl(\ l--ç-f, c!

:

\¿U(Jz-ú.tnLU

Pc0)

trCJb¡

õ=or ):

ro3>foLUot.Y(JioocQf,E(o-:ÊnPl>39p;foõu)Uõtr0J

q-õ(úñ^L oJLJJ

l

OOLNOñlocotLncolNsf. Fr

tnÉ.tlJFLLJô_

UUÉ.

coç-1O(\It-F-l

rl

O4(o

VUo(JzrÉ.

L!T>3<oo coç-l ç-l

O(\f--r-lil

(JoQc(oT;LosäOJ

f,EGJQo

ô_

oðq

.qJ

.9o

o_

(o

:aE:foP(IJ

=:l(9

qJ

Eo+

-r^PLfoL)

cl-cOLroqJØ(uÉ.

OqOt-.)ç-l

O4O

É.t!zÉ.t!o

ONr-.ç-l

rl

lfJú.LLLLLrJ

tt)ïô=CJ'tCJ

ôE(o

Þ¡.=EõboCJ

CJ(JcCJ

OJçcoOq)

Eo

I(oLP.ç

cCJco(t

(o'cAJ

o_a='-(U6ELcJE=(oØ3ro0J '-> ;roJtÉ. o_

OqC)tt)(\ñ

Lnì(\

(nÉ.LIJFt!o_

ciUú.

óïlOC\

ç-l

-l

ñoo-o-(g

oPf()oE(u

'-oçc.9PoE

P

(oLôLôN

LNLÔ

sf

tn\(o

vUoUz-ú.

LIJ

oorlO(\rlç-l

=P(oPØOJrh(o()

Lô\co(oF-l

LNNo

v()oUzIÉ.

t!

cor-lO(\ilF-l

Fl

oo.E-oloboCJ

b¡c(o

3-ì<-cPBLG)çco(J

lö:(J:ciar

CJçoUv)=P(õ

lpib¡iCELloboqJ

-:¿()(o

co

(J-c==-ocoo-OJL

o(J

ìocoo-CJ

o

i¿(J(o

co

ü-cE=CJçcoOEcñEcoo-OJ

Lo(JØ'e.9PoEõ.Fc(IJPao-b¡c

õqluo:Eä_cï(JL=(EaCJtâ=O'=És

rn\m$oo

LNc.J

il

:¿UoUzTú.

LU

cor-lOa!.\orF-{

l

o_cP

bD

.=-o(oboCJ

:o-foo¡(olr1

It_c.=ìEcoo_

OJ

oC)

Þõ.=:=

3oco¡.5ErúboCJ

(J(o

co

r¿¡_c ,rP_

5(J:o '>

=õ$--cJf-=ooUU

ú)\oo(oFl

LNc\d

v(Jo(Jzl<l-ld::

LU

-mïlO(\Ln

Ft

coLCJELo3

.q.)

OJ

(J(D

co

(JEoLçL(ocEf

ì.eÈEco-:¿ (J()(oFcoo

L

(Jc-oo(oØØqJ

PoCJLô-€.jp¿c

OJ

Pl:'; bo>-õ

o>+õ(JÈFcõ\(Jõ

OLfll'rmcf)

OLN

d

:¿(JoUz-ú.

LU

cor-lOôlcO

Fl

LoCJ

ô_

jEc(g

-v.(o

co

(J-cE3õcøCJL

oU

OOOOOOLn,Lnsf,-l

........r1I¡ Lôl-\ (\

OO

V]V(J:(Jo:o(JUzz--ú. ú.\n tnLIJ LU

l-r Þrç-l ç-lOOC\NFINc! (\(\Nrl -1

OJ

E(!Øb¡l.glE]Lì(!b¡OJg

boctõ

-<rE:cjt!i

ØtLOJPo)ô-s¿.-cl.=l3l

-olC:ooØc.)

LoO

CJ

E(o

oçG)

loo_OJ

o-Ø'=(oPv1

OJ

rõ()Ec(U

c.9oE(!,FcOJPoo_bo.EE(ob¡OJ

-Y(J(o

co

(J_c

==LOJ

co(.)

:iO:O ;

OrO

b¡o(trLP

OJqto(Jb¡.=Eq(ooooL

0.J(JcOJLGJ

%co(JoUiFço

I

tõLÈc

OO(\Fl

LN(.!rl

u)ú.LIJþLrJ

ciUú.

È-rlO(\O(\Nr-l

b¡OJProLPØCJtâ(!Ub¡.=E(oþo0)L

(u(JcOJ

OJçco(JOJ

i;

I

loLPc

ONf-r

LNItrci

ttlÉ.LUt--LUô--iUUÉ.

Nr{O(\Olïlc!il


CJ

=r^.2q)c'TP(Jo-o

(õ()CJ-cP

o3(g

-c(JLrgOJ

OÉ.

oqOi{oÌm

o4oo

tnCftrJFL¡J ø)Lú.

-:.4fl,, zd<L<J5:)

ooFIOr\¡(oc\

!.rD

OJ

(lJ

E

'-P

3.9CJq

CJ()COJEoa-OJ

oQ

3OJ.;(uÉ.

OqOOO-ì

l

Oqç-l

oor-lONLô

(\

OJf,.9OJc'-PQo'uCJ

(ÞCJ

OJ

-cP+o3(o

-c(JroCJ

c)ú.

OqLÔsf(Ðñ

LN\Lô

v)É.

Jfco-l(\

l\-Irnt\\.(\

-ctúq.)ØqJ

b¡.gEboOJ

Ø'-;-cv=CJ+co(JOJ

.=

E.EcoFoE(o{=coPoo-Þ¡

E(obo(IJ!

-cI .-.i

ö .sr0JiÉ. o_

Ot?f..cûco

O'r')C)

\Z(Jo(JzIÉ.v)LTJ

:loor{O(\LN

(\

ØqJ

fØo().2Ero

E.=

PcoEAJ

o_o_

=Ø3.9OJú

OOOOLNOcr)OoLnFt

aLôd

\rtú.L¡Jf-LTJo-

U()tJ<

=>co ooF-l çlOONc!-\ -\(\ (\c! c!

rnOOr-l-octo

tr)(\c\

2ú.

z

c{O

coOcoOJ(Jç.CJE'5LlJçoGJ

fÉ.(oLCJÌoGJ

LLLAJEcf

PCJboE_oEOJ

oo-o

o.=:o,õ.2E

'Ìf,CO

-c(JL(oCJ

qJÉ.

\Z \ZU(J-O .^O=(J d(J;iz !zÁ{.¡[(u..,r&o-rô¿"¿<ci øft¡2>t!<YLLlrvS-;S¿cô

= = Ë

=ãóooooócocos-l ç-l F{ il I r-tOOOOONN(\(\(\'\ \\ -\ -\. -\rl Fl r-l (\ (\-\'\ \\'\ '\NC\C\(\N

.T

LoçOJ

=.2

.gcc)

!.;qJ

b¡.CEL(ob¡o

AJ

.F(oLoOJ

ñ(J

Lo

F-c(JtoqJ(tt

oqrn(\ç-lr-l

LN|-ìco

qb¡>(oPIP

L

-CJ\o_-cxycoJ3 .9qpor ì,1 -oLôlllo;ib¡OYqJ

LP

õ..oqrLØOPc

: ÞoõCI

:L>nõ-;i b¡ -cü ar.=(uL>LoJb¡u:-C.u=qJèos=ä euÞoce 3p.9or-L(JØ

q-

È n P-o'=Xe->.lcfúLØP

,E Ø >i4.ccfLro_O=ru'-(o(J-[i'Fo!çØfiËbLCJ-:--ñØ-!2cc(Þ>_=(JqJ.ro;=b¡-L=-!Po.= (J

- ftn-óLSØqJL!YCJPLÃU.-çLi.-nØ>õOXiCJ(ULuYordO

Lô, O. O Lô\qq\cotJ.)oco(ooLnslç-l Ff ¡'\ CO

cn a!

LN LN\ra{ r-l

;;(.1 1O(o

ñU

ELçqJ(Jcq)

::eog'-

SFtroOO-UQJ3o-(U:.<.tuOJ ,:.- oJØLcJ o-f-ØYØL

loE2Þo| .-YØo_ :l(Jb¡Ø.=õ

Eptõ:bouqJL-qJ

-IZ î(JEocJot^c(!äT.=--o__i L_ro! o.oYcJ3*s0JCJØþcao

L-JU

Ln\cf)$Ln

LN\O

(9

=Tcoil

a!F-l

N

zlrl-(J

Izttnv\t!J

c.9(!IUo-(uLa-(!

Pbo.EEñb¡qJ

(JcoqJçco(JCJ(J

UI

(gLP.=

2(E'-qJ

rúE

EP

3OJ'5CJÉ.

OqOLnNñ

Ln(.|c\

t,

ülF(, UJ&o-<l¡7

=HJ<

=>oo ooç-l r{OON C\¡

r-l F-lco cor-l r-l

CJ:fØ

L

.gcqJ

=OJ

-cQ(oAJ

qJú.

oqOcf)

-ì

Oqco

P()OJ

oo--c(JñCJqCJL

Þo.çE(gÞoqJL

,2L

;-c.=3Loco(JEcõEcoo-OJ

o(J

LN\(or-l

rnc'lO

vUo(JzIÉ.V)LIJ

:-loOr-lONrlcoç{

(UUcqJ

OJ+coCJ(JiEço

I

toP.=_h-(o'CAJProç(o'-3CJ

CJ

L^o

!oboc_i

=oQPcJ fo_c=3åOJ

cJ o_'ìJ _cñqJ 'c

=þ¡c5 -c¡AJL

í) 9{É.YOqOLNl-rorì

Ln\co

v\É.lrJFLUo_

ciUú.

cOrloNOcf)

r-l

AJc.=3

OJ

o(J.2ELCJo_x

OJ

o(J.9E(!PcCJ

EOJ

o-o_

=vic.)

fo().2-o

E=

oPrúLP

coEAJELô.l(oOc\

".ì

rf)|ìsf

VUoUzr¿u)LIJ

oorlOc{Oao

F-{

ìocOJPPñaJ-

cØ(o.lØ_o^- _E.ll xes(oCO-=cJ9:õi,ò Il-cËe(E

OJ:6

<. 0J

ELLroËL(Oot^õgoL,-

>€! UYoJ

=î,bo=.= vlOJUqJØEE-uo'-(l'oqt)g(oaJ-L9èc

(o(Up

E -:¿

õrc<;

-:¿ØloP

EcloØOJf.9(!'cPoLo-

=()

!oP-)¿(Jo(Jc(õ

=ìEc(It

qJPq.,

o-

cLÈro'= tt>L oüçgt¿qJ(ooJì;PõPOÈ-oÞc.¡ ,YP>

OlJìf..coO.ì

Ot r'.)

il

(9

=ïïlOa{Omç-l

zLI.JïU

¡ztrntntiJJ

c.9P(!(oo-oLo-lo'TPÞ¡.çELñboOJ

CJ(Jcq.)LCJçco(JOJ

iEo

I(gLP.=

I(o.TqJ

r!E(o'-P

3.9AJúOqOLô(\.ì

LÔô{ri

r,t)ú.LUFlr,o-

U(-)É.

oorlO(\O)(\¡

ç-{

PØo=oOJ

-oc(uøq)

(Û!o-f(!P-ooo_Lo

!(u

o(J.9-o

3OJ

CJúOqLôt-.r(o

oqç-l

\¿(Jo(Jz-É.

LU

oor{OC\O)(\s-l

!.gLCJP(û

E(o'CP

=OJ';OJ

öEõvl

OqOrnr\¡ñ

Lnc]N

r./)ú.LIJFL!o-

ciUú

ooç-l

c!.(o.Nil

bo.=E(oo¡oL

qJOcCJL(uçco(JCJ(J

so

I(oL

.=

ñAJo-o-(Þ

LoPf(Jo=G)P.=b!.gELroboOJ

c)(JcOJ:ocoo-ØOJLLo()OJL(tro_q.)L

ô_

(Ð

E(o

Þo.=õ(ob¡CJL

-c(JtoOJt^CJL

Ø',õ

->(ocro

-oOJP(1,

Eo_fbo.=-oL(oÞoQJL

cOJVIc(oïjE3OJ+coUOqLNl-r(o

Oqç{

v(Jo(Jz:E

¿tnLU

::lcorlO(\(o(\r-i

BOJ'5OJ

(oCJo_o-(o

oPf

o=oP.Ebo.=õ(oooGJ

c(J(o(u(UØ-(UCLltr

F" o¡qJ .L--o_þä(oo¡'C CJoLË9ì

CJ(tEPO>o-oJ oJ'ttOJôÉ.ú

OqOLJ')N

=t'

rnC\+

v)É.L¡JFLLIô-

c;(JÉ.

oorlO(\Ln(\rJ


CJPñEELPFoqJ

c(o:JcFco(JÞo.=ElobooL

LOJ

OJo-.-.i

-cE3o(JOJ-õcoØCJLLoUOlJl(\(oN

LNc]o

=tolÉ.cor-lOC\<f,çlN

,õloØ

.- (JcJl

Erccro.-PØCc0J.9El0J(J ôoF(õthcTOôesõàõPorË *Pq!roLLØ.9.oboPL'cq cr=LçV.c0ts ËØþ¡Q= oJ

U--CJ=È(J.voJcØ¡¿LO GJ G.)

oJb¡=E.CUqJ :Cl drNXà p^Èñw+-=d')^I-rPft,-;L(U.-PLL(UV1.

oreP(u0J(Uo-(JocJ i-= LLq-Þ¡o-o(o

OqOr..)f--d

Lô\(o

(nÉ.LUt-LlJô-

ciUú.

cOrlONanrlN

Øo:l

.9oc'=P(JoECJ\h(oUCJ-cPço

=õo-cÞ¡.cEL(!Þoq)L

E

Eç.(o

oECJ

EOJvl

a-EoUOqOco(om

C)qco

r./)

É.

7

JloorllO](\l-\lm,rl .

(\

PcOJ

ECJFPq)

o¡;

E3(o(oO¡ -rcJ-:>-¡sSPlo_(Uc(Jo-C O-PØ'- qJ5teu=ôy(Juc

EqJ

õecoO(JQ_ØØfL(Oovl{.p

oJ rtr

EgCF

EcaJ '-PLqJoØ'Foo_oÈC L-'CJ qJ

¡Jç(!O

OqLN(\Itr<:

Oql--

VUo()z-ú.\nLIJ

oorlOc\mç-l(\

CJ

.=E:.g

c'Eotr(o{=cCJ

oo_oP-ocqJ

Pp(o

ìloiL

Proc-Jvl=Loç

t>.C

ìOçPq

CJPc

'OicrOJP(õcþo'õ

tcJtô

PcCJcAJP

oìoc(o

c.9(õL(oo-CJLo_

lo'-I

AJ

o_bo.cEL(Eo¡CJ qJL -C+ft¡o(JuCP(UE:trcJ;(o!9c(g ø)

vt(!

etõõ:.t

CJy>}EoJØçO)oØ(J .Ø

OqLÔC\l--

Oqr-l

(9z

=-coF-lONmF-l

N

_c(J

c)

CJ

(!boooJ-

Elu

Þo.cELroo¡CJ

CJQcOJ

OJçco(JoU

E ---jFTU

lD

POCF

CJetÌo-OJ

G)(ocP.=

o.!Eco'-=ut=oJ¡-Ølrn::trcôöoar .=NE

=fiJ:b¡

OqoLn|.rcri

Ln\m

u,,t zÉUL!rF(JL! -lô-1.=(J L/)ú. tn<u]coilOa\.\c{F-l

(\¡

IAo:i

OJcP(Jo-oOJ

fo(,)qJ

-cPo3ñ

-ç.Poo

.EE(ob¡o

Ef-oc(gLoEOJ

ECJrho

EoUOqOOìOtñ

O.r)(o

:tUoUz4sa-ú¿'<LÔZrlJ <Þ=<:)@cor-1 ç-lOOa{ a{-\l-\N(\ç-l c-{

C\N

'-;!c(o

(J

co

O4c!Flf'rco

c)nLN

UUìL

ccJØ(lJ¡ô-.o¡e2P=CP

-=-(lJõEOOOUooçL.i tõ-o_rocÞooaJ o-LØ

_c oJul-rI,9(Ue

Yc.- ot^'E:fõ/^r C

õo-ØO(UL-õçØcPO

'='õ;g(lJg

o(oEplE_,ploc=o)o)AcJ>a- î)

ØYa. oJ,uc>'=qJÈÉ.=

EcõqJ

c:.=

c.9otr

ØPc(ucCJ

toPq

(o'-POo-vl=P(!P

c)

ñb¡.gc(oboCJ

CJ

qJo-

-c-3E',b¡ ro

.Ìp

0J-A-J õ

O'4l-rool--

Ln\O

vtolú.coF-lO(\Nç-l

C\

OJc'=È

cØc

lo:.F

iEfú,Ðc(uPo

lo-

iPEcCJPP

LN

IoO(orl

Lô(\o

V(-.)Øo

É' Çtu)7l-¿uJ l\dI

Ò.ú.Yu)ä>5<oo coç-{ rlC)O(\ (\\\ \\OJç-i Fl

N ì c..¡

È€-cXAJ

õ,'-P

(o

cAJ

ECJ

o-:f,:

oocþØõ(úÞo'-OJ CJ!tPAJPUÈ:c_I.eAJ:

Fc>

o)ì¡.-'i or-Y9fiJLLOJ

.=c.-ooo-çØã9(/): sb¡QcE=LqJto'=b¡aE#jO]OqrqOiOLÔO1qcoN

Ln loN]LÔcol(\

\nÉ.LIJFI.JJô_

c;UÉ.

oor-lOñlo)

qJ(JcqJLqJ

c

CJQ

oI

(tr

.gaJ-Ø(!(,)

CJ

-cPço

=(uioc(o

OJ

.=

E.E

c.9oEþo.=ÞLñb¡OJ

-c()LñCJ

CJL

rob¡CJ-)

ØCJf.9qJc'-

P

oEo(o(JOJ

-cP+o3(o

b¡.=EluÞoq)L

-Y(Jo(JcroïoLCJP

OJ

OJ

oo-EoUoqOcnr\¡

OLN

d

2É.

7

JloorlO(\o)r\

CJ

EforhÞo.=-o(oÒ¡oL

l.r)\oos-lLñrl

rn.]N

V(Jo(Jz-¿tnLU

cor-lONO)(\

E(oCJìPOJ

tõ.(J(US

r!ìØL

oo cJCF

-rt õb¡!OCLõv-;ì -õ

sËco-+laJ

.:L

-io-OF

'= d)5.=õçcL65

Ø :.-93:õUP oOCL(oE.eä-1-'!l t,

-c .=x-oor=Ëxfoc)åsìccJlc'= 0J

ü)rú.<OOrr;(\l-r

l

:

Ocç-l

zt!T(J

Iz=,-<Y\t) -Lô <-

-r- B<IooF-lO(\O)

c\

Eo.vl

OJL

qJN->(Uc(o

äo,Þ(õ

(oo_ooJL-o-c

(oloØ'c boPcb¡=

=õYo¡rõCJb¡LOJ qJLQcJc(JqJc-oaJc:o;Ø=aJ(JL

cr9Uvit 0J

O(uõ-ELLq9c(ooJ(UiroPEbo(oIOP

P(U

=E(UaJ

cJ ;rÉ.óOqOr-l-)(\$

LNcJst

tnÉI.JJFLUo_

ci(Jú.

ooç-lC)c\oo(\

OJf.9AJc'-()o

ECJØrg(JqJ

-c

o3ftJ

b¡

EL(obo(uL

-:¿UoUc(oI

oLOJP

OJ

CJ\hoo-EoUOql.r)s('o(\

Ln\r/)

l

:

IÉ.

z.

Jfco

I i-llc)]N;\\

coc\

cOJ

EqJqJLÞo(ÞPcq)

Ec,PPCJ

Ec(o

.9

.9boolo'-PÞ¡.=E(UooAJ

EroOJ

CJ

to(J

-c.t3Ecoa-øCJL

o(J

Lô\oO(o-l

Lnc\d

VUoUz=É.

L!

:loorlO(\cO

(\

(o'-P

oFØ

.QP.9Þooõ(UL

3.QJ

OJÉ.

Lôc]rlcorl

ø)Nci

zLUIIzieea==<:E

corlO(\l-.a{


-c(JtooVICJL

EOJPõc)

P

fEcoQ

Ø''L-

;Eo

oEOJ

E-cOL(oOJ

CJ

=CJ';oú.

CJ()gOJ

OJçcoQCJ()

tE

(g .i

C ñØ-çar(Jr,E

GJ

o_EOOPPCLCJ G)

ÞpõorFL6eÞo9c 6.¡

=P¡g=Þooo()LcJcØ(û>ar9_c -OPC'5(o:, 1Y ñrc';oc)L LOJ

:q)õE(J(UCJ VI

cb!^C-C -OO-LCJÑþrt-L

Ar-

Ero

LotsCJLtoo_OJLo-

(Þ

oooo-

cOJ

EqJ

PPCJØÞo.g!ll)Þ¡OJ

(o(J(u(JcCJg

oç=ai(JÈ

ËØ3Pc.r p;õüÞ¡cE'õç

P LrsO'-Ø.u c.)P L(ooO-o

qJOço

_th(,o

oPAJ

P+roL-o

3.9OJL

boAJProLPt^

cq.)

EOJ

Pq)ØÞo.gE(ub¡OJ

õcfo(J(oOoEcro

ILJo()c(oT;vìLOJPAJô-ë¿.-c.t3(Þ(JOJ(JcCJ

CJFcoQEcOJP

OJ

E(o

o¡.='ìc(!þoOJL

AJ

cOJLqJçco(J

OcOOO"ì

o()i.=o

I

(oLP.S

-)¿(oPPcOJ

EG.)

PoFofPõPØb¡.EEñboCJL

E(oG.)

oPCJ(JcOJ

15co-vlCJL

oQOJLõo-AJ

ô-

IOJ

a.)L

ôOJL

lo'-ÞcroPcOJ

Êo

qJ

oo.=E(oÞo(u

EiuOJPAJrhõ()-cP L'= cJ> -(fL !oJotsbDõ.9-o -ocoJro -cYøXcJcJcoÈU(o

OJ(JcOJõcoo-ooEc(g

vì

oo-CJL

P

OJo_Xq)

uiPcqJ

E=QoEEL

CJ

a-3

.qJ

OJÉ.

Lô\coF-lItrN

LN\m

bo.E-oroboc.)L

Ev¿-c.l3

-ocoo_qJ

oUL'qJ

-oc:õ(o.C

LoqPcCJ

Ef(J

EOJ

-:¿P

OJ

o(J

Ec(õ

ç'eco3

CJ

cCJEcoo_

AJ

Lo(JPc(u

ECJePAJ

-oc(Þ

bocitlo

Pì

CJL

3.qJ

OJú

Þ¡c_-O-

ËõtrbL-O-:¿ cCJ'Ão-3Eo.!Ibo;.c-cc.!:sbobog.g ö¡(u=<u;cat¡¿ñ'- -õ

.gh(oF(Jo-o(J:l roo:tr3p;O!(o.l-o=qç oJ .rsL(JLlocc)s9Ëìi-cXoJgÜrq(lJFP>E

ñ.,õ'L ar cl;, l)s-.=A.OEìt oroJØo_QJ '- o)ú. ã _y.

c0.)

EOJ

CJ

EPcOJPoo-b¡.=-og

luÞoCJ

0)QcOJLqJ

FcoqJco-co_qJ

CJF

_cE3q.)

FcoU

o-CJLo_

(o'L-PEcro

cqJ

EOJ

FPCJr^Þo

.ç!L(oÞoo

Eq.,P

CJ

(E(,)

-c..l3LOJscoQEc(o

Ecoo-ØCJLLoU

I

oQ

!cõPcGJçOJbo(ooocOJ

c.9õOJNà(Ec(o

ì0.)

ocCJ

EOJ

PPqJq

þo.='t5L(oÞ¡CJ

OJQcu;qJPLC

.Q oJ

- Foo(J ór-. L:q b¡.Yõl-F

-:o)YøcoC

AJfØ.2CJc'-Uo:oOJ

õ(u-cço

=fÞbo.=EL(Eb¡CJL

E:f-oc(oLoEoEqJ

oo-Eo(J

OqLnrln(\

gEç =+Joo(gr|:o*c (J

CP1,¡CL (lJcJqçLc0Jobo(JõØ9plcrñ!

øLCJo¡.9 ELLI foEsa(o>.Cb¡=:=o!9

(õqJ

9L'qrL(ULPE a)

E:EC CJ

U 9.qror:c(Juo¿EIi()

?98g o¡EpC^

P(glõg

.ñboêLq.).-P!! c.¡ .3€:EEEEõo)(Uo-t oCJLLgoboO-LJ(U

oEto

q.)

=.9AJc'-P(JoEo(o(J

CJ-cPs

=(oo-cbo.=EL(obo(u

Ef

!ctÞ

oE(u

E(U

oo-EoUOqtr)côqç-l

LO

I(\

q.)

f,E(u-c(JØEc(õ

o-a)g

o-lÞ'-l

bocõLG'bolcJl

cqJ

crgT

tnÉ.LIJF(, L!

&o-<ci7<VJ<

=>co: ooJ,r-lOO(\Nt\ \\(o (oç-l ç-l

C\ (\

LNc]r-l

\¿(JoC)zId.V)UJ

-:lcOr-lo(\r-l(\

OJfØ.9CJcL

UoEAJ

(o()qJ

-cço3ro

c)-cPbo.E-o(ob¡OJ

Ef

roc(oLoEOJ

EOJ

ooEoUOqOLn

nco

!

ãñoJqPCoioØ '.Ðroñ-:f-CeP-

=sLEescisO=:o-tsro:E!-:qJo_-q:ì(Uy{LCocJcjlL.- cJ

rõc'-oP(JlØgËiP

€E^

LYor.EEUqr(UPPP_oLØo-'t(oølXorobUO

.9 99;ro .! -i;L'õLOOL(E';(ocJ;ib¡ØòEE

OOO]C)o ìú;Lô I l--l-\' (O

(\

Ln.l(oOr/)

r¡\C\

LN\O

oqLô(\l--

oqr-l

O4l--cOco

OLn

d

:¿Uo(JzI¿rt)LJJ

:lco\-lO(\(\(\C\

zIJJ:tIz=<9ea3=<-

ooçlOC\(\(\(\

cor-lOc!ì-lNc{

V,U_8ú=*+-znÁër¡2UJg'dcor-lOc!Oc\N

zt-!-

-(J>-l_Z

>-<9\ûa53=ú<T.co oorl çlOOc! c!-\:OOc\ (\(\1 (\

rt)c](OOLN

Ln(\(fjOOì

oq()LÔ

.ì

Lô..|r-l

Ocar-r)N

Ln\cOsfco

OaOOO-ì

Oqr-t

\nÉ.LIJFuJo_

UUÉ.

F-toc\r¡ç-l(\

IÉ.

z==coFlO(\LÔr-lN

rnÉ.llJFL!ô-

UUÉ.

coFlO(\<'r-l(\

tt)É.

zJl-coilO(\<.JN

V(Jo(JzTú.çl)L!

ooFlOC\

s'ilN

OqOLNN$

rnN+

OqOLncO

-ì

O4l--

C)qr!

Oqri

oqt-l

(nÉ.LUFLrJô_

o'(Jú.

LôIO

v(Jo(JzïÉ.tnLIJ

:-cOì-lONçl(\c!

(9

=ïoOr{oC\ç-l(\c\

Oqri

LNÔ!Ln

vUØoÉ' e)u-J ?ir

d!

ÒÉ.Yu)<¿>ig

oor-lOr\mr\c{

coF-l()(\(\(\c\¡


^OSio\lmÐ+în<ltiJ cOzt<É. l\)õb-L¡(Jm

: trJ

>É.ìÉÉ.t t

t!- ¿.u- -z

=a

OLñO-ì<ît

I

vtôfú.

O(Os<J\

tnÉ.

zJ:f

OOOr-l{.n'

O(oO)<tt

t)'lÉ.LUFLUo_

ci(JÉ.

Lnl'r(O{-r}

OO\o{/!

I

:trJo(JzId.v)t!

Lô(\l--.J\Oln(o<ît

I

(,z

=-zLU

-UIz

=tntnLUJ

Ococô{.r}

zoUFIt-!JJLUco

Iô

bo.çEL(ob¡Eoi

trõ3.9 b¡-c.= -o3äeìyccJ cJL U0JctsEooU:

sgo-c !'lo-YõEar9Pó

qJ '-c(UCJ()P0JcJõvtcb¡o

=ØYcJõL9ooUOL

4., IEoE=OJ (]Js.-c>o9(J

ar j-'(JciË (J

ocåqrcqJ Ø

PcOJ

EoP

ob¡.c!LñÞooL

E(oqJPCJ

(o(J

-cv3LOJ

co(J

't3cõiocooqJL

o()LÕe!(oLÔco

"ì

l.l-)\(\

.2

->loc(o

-(fc(D

Øco(o

=(Jtg(J

13qJ

(oEo_:fGJ

-cLoPcfo(JQ(tr

oPco{=(E

(uõAJ-o

-ØcCJ

cfo-

ñ(Jo!c(g

c(oc.)

-c.:3:ItrUCJQcCJ

OJçco()

-ocCJ

(o

EcõqJQcC.)-oEoo_

OJL o.)

oc()(g

cbooJcE-oqrh=à¡irr CJ

tõ-6,uc>=(UO

ú. (J

rnPcAJ

EOJP(ÞPØ(o.T

AJLo-

=.qJ

(UÉ.

OqLôN(oñ

OJ

Eto

bo.=E(ob¡CJL

CJ()cCJg

OJçco(,)

CJ(Ji.-o(o

.c

cq)

ECJP

ob¡.SEL(gboOJL

u1IôoPOJ

cCJicjco_

CJLLoCJ

'tCJL

cc(õ

3o

CJ

P'cCJ

Ec)P

OJ

o¡.S!loboOJL

OJ(JcQJLOJ+coCJQËo

I(o

Pc

--iqJ,

c:loUbo.=Ølo;O-lo-oPLCJ

PcJl

CJL

PcCJ

cOJ:

PqJ

OLn

t-rcOOcô

^;Ln

sl

çOJ'T

-oEboLC

arç=õ*Þ¡Xcrfc!o=aJ(U

Nü--(U(U(JCrlO .PäBCgocJ'-+(o:JCI(J.ñõ=()ä-o-qr=(õO-o o-oØ-0)J L

L:oõucø' b¡

L

(o=LSSa(JOJQJPO(oØOJ

-Lc_ØLc(!(U

!bo.C

¿-Õo.=Pç

E,!Qí?(J< ..t:

CJ()cCJ'uco-OJ

oQPcqJ

ECJ

POJ

=.qJ

CJÉ.

ú)c]ç{oor{

I(o'-OJPñEEqJPõCJL

EctoqPcCJ

EqJPloP

õ.II

OJLo_

=.9AJÉ.

LCJ

oLOJPcfo

L('

.oIäôaJ ,9!- or(ECCOlõ o-.\ Øoq)õ9poo€cL õìo b¡ËEÞo_c)FLõ

qJoL)PcoÈe3cqJo(J(JCor9.9 cr

9õõ9:cr

o

f,crooOJP>

=Ooã(J.-vtE

ôõ=EcJo

&s

-cE3OJçco(J

:clc(o

!coo_

oJ -itoJõ?tJ-

çUoÞ¡(o'õ

=oeO-E3-t3 0oJPP Lru OJ

o- br

OJYvt

;Eo

sõñE(JOJ

OP

-t^ aã90Ø.=CE'(uLT(o

b¡-qJ¿L

OEP(o-o aJCPaJ(u

äsOJ

Erú

oo.=ELrUb¡OJ

(¡.)(JcOJEcoo-t^CJLLo(JìCJ'5CJ

qJ'

(!-oo_:l

cqJ

EG)PPqJ

b¡.çEL

ÞoCJ

-Y(Jocñ-;c=3qJ

+coL)

O'4¡.r(osfñO)ç-l

O'4r-lf'rN

OqOlr)C\ñ

rnc..|

N

Ln

|-\coOìsf

l

rf)|-\+

ttÉ.LIJF--LUo-

ci(Jú.

cor'lOc!co(\(\

V(Jo(Jz-¿rt)LU

ooF-lONoo(\(\

(97

=ïcos-{Or\oo(\c!

zAurUIF-ULJJ>r

-;¿-^.-:>-<É. '^ tn<

= rr-.1

¿.É.<corlOC\oo(\N

Uo(Jz-É.\L!

oOç-lO(\t-.*Na{

'zLllIT

>9=¿v-;eg\YÀ<=3=d,{ I

corlac\t-r(\(\

ooriC)Nf..NN

OclLi-) l

N.

OqOLn\r-l

OqOlnN+

Lô(-j$

rhÉ.LUFLUô_

ci(JÉ.

zLIJI(J

Iz=v)V,LIJJ

ooç-lO(\(oc\(\

L/')clç-{cOLn

N

LN\m

r¡.!-lcoFl

LNNd

\¿UoUzïÉ.rnt-!

:ucoF-1O(\r\c\

l--

Oqr-l

Lô. O\úìr-l (\

Lnc!U

cor-lOc\f--Nc!

(9z

=-corlOc{

(\c\


9.9E 3,ç-f- (¡ 0J l"í

='P g Aç b =

€- ro-ì!1 c iE crEt-¡::,z=äSþE;i'giI58È=5spÞË s Ë 3p P i; åË Hi å;9"sBEqfrPP.9 rob - EcgiEEi-s:Ë5 çËeH'ÞbÈE5EsP

F,gËöfiHËËeãË¡:= E:ci.9,ã EÈ ãy-=q'õru.*

EEËjj'-:3- t rs-ì c Y3 à=FE á.9^

= ü3H E;:Ëä'- to P r 'u u È: ..

åþgËÞ99#EË€ËÞEË,

ilt-

U)q.):lØl_ c'lIU'--cJ¡J(.r)L

e53¡ "+þItr(Jt¡m a'€. c.-.UGE- )roÈ uì .,

=-HEFì .5 c-r:/LôLL- lt(L)=q:

þËgÇ a-9 L!U-E

tËuoL.,ôlUlYat>,:ã..;PE o!toPØp_ØruõËa'EoËrulÞ R6 õ__>'=c,)rugp E

cfgE

CJI\Øtgt-cf(l,)cc'> -o ru

Q)r-¡-Ðss _ü

-(uLõE o^CcpL

Uv (/.) crLa.'}ô tPQi(ft(l.)-!i ô-c!¿cJØLÔ

PE qJ

iaiLtoL.OO) nlGJ d-) (, -LLÈ¡ Cc)u:¡!O+JçF'Øa)þ E.EP

^: ! H õ btrl õ =ø.ì

ç3p..9dsË! o aJ n6 cÞËf::=þ-¡-rt-LUr C.) tJ JE !9ìE r u to ,9ro_c.o õ_c øu9cn!!.)C)Okt¡O=uÐrvt-¡v.-E3g6sÈù9-oE9öOOOqqqFr OO COL¡.) OO i-rco oo Ln

{+ {+ {+

tncO CJ 'lJ

^,ÐVLSJì-ocro0J:ö t CIøEF9 ä õE'3F'¡= o Èc'>õrs o =çorÉF ü 9Ëg(D-ikcoE

c v (J'r ov*Otn.(]o-o--?''i c J c:-o-ãe E 8.ã;c -- v\ 9'=_c+€ ! ô0P-loc-c-to.LU rs ÈAq.)g.; H ;RP

ñìv

EË ê =sq'-È(-Os>.r O C') * X e4'A g .eöfiv= i: o oE5È Y <Þd.'=E AJ -'Ë uõ.r õ õ o(gEG n 9eu.Pvõ.úñPìõ,¡r^á q r ar; cLco ", -o ro -c!c.l.--'.,9-^5ØstãqgËou'Er-Ë ! Ëü;¡.Eñ X.L ru I c iÒ'-O.ry g 3õ 9e¿ tå¡m-UlxE PE 8ì¡ s E"rg.Jñ--õ_c0.1-:l3aÈq',¡ui-.¡Yõ.s9'ã*xbEõ9H=eüHL-L,_(ULñqJTUETUC(JTOÈL

Ðcro

3(u(uL

,¡r ,fr1GJ,v,9 ulof

=ËlnC-o¡-+, (lJØr-o;-o-jga)E-O ]QJ

rn tØrìEILfiro

e8clo:FOõgfooYo,o,-o,roÈrs_:¿õosË'õ=C:LfgCJU

O.LN

ñ,N

U)

ro(J

.¡JC

, (.)L

](o.o_Lq)+)(oq-Loq-

JF)o-L(J

IØ:, U)iC,o,'F

ro.(JC=Etrõ(JCJL

IE:fg:c):.P

fuo)OJ

opU)

loEAJ

O; Lf)

rN,Ìli r-l

q)c.ErUOJ

-cU)tnAJE.=(U

(L

c.)L

Eo'ÐoEOJL

co+)cLo

_cF(9o

4J

Ecru

EoL(L

U)'ro

E0.)

Oqoì01r-'l

tJ):fpru(n(uU)roU0)L

co.l-)cLo-cF

lr

l(9Èro.L

i(F

:((l(JqJco-co-c)o-)1)

OrC)io;i cf)

F{

{+

Lq.)

_ctf(L

o¿)U)(J

EA.9 .Yr

OONO)ro

OO

r-l

-EgFL-9õJr'.Ðfg(JqloOtp

'\L O

.9õ6-ocLQJ-tJ4 !qll- lJ'E r¡-co'rg >-o-b-px .10--cP a.,

.=PLtOru=9,ubo

LñìYoühËãc-r,*cN-ch ='or 9ü õ.9 ç9'>güq 96I.ì

OOLOOd+(l)\o N

ñ>{+ {+ 1?r

Otr)ci<-N

OOOOod+1.. NN

{+ {+Oc{c.j

l'.r-{Oc!cor-lLNO

Þ- t--F-l ÌlOOa\ c\c\ Lnri r-{t/.) l.r)OO

\ l-rÌ-l r-lOOc!NoìoO Y-]

LN LNOO

s

Itr-lOc{coOtr)O

co$

OoqO

l--r-lOr\r\OLNO

OqOLN\r

f..r--{ONt.c\fO

{+Oq(\

{+ {#Oo?Ì-{

f-.riOc\Nr{

LNO

O O O OO\o co oo s<-O<-

OOOOL?,-1O'O

c!d

Oø '-lo

NNNI-.ltr-{ F{ Fl r-{ FlOOOOOc{ (\ (\ c\ c\.\ -\.\ -\.\OO ï-r l\. Cn l:(\c\c!oo'\

t\'\ \

t\

t<-s\l-$OOOOO

f"r-{Oc\c,îF{

alXf€å

S N OOO

\¿

\t\¿

V:¿ã>¿

Vv

:¿

\¿

\¿

:¿

coèU

:¿

o-v\./ m COË<<B=\¿o_o_(J(Jä_<

EXHIBIT C


c"t*i+)CJ

tglt!:ft-o

CJ

pf(JOXoo.)L

co1)C,Lo-ct--(9

l¿(Jo(JcroT-;o

1J

3fgEa)

Otr)ñ\o+

P.9.u).Ø(Jc+)

=Eca)Eroo

J)

co'+toEq)L

coprgfCI

(u

!crgU)'õ->fucto

3rg

c)UIrU(J

OqONcn

{#OOO

Y-{

1).2tnU)OJc

..H

=Ecq)

Elgo

4J

co'+toEo.)L

copruffuq)

EcruU)'õ->fUcto

=;v,ru()

C)ltr)'

tJ',p(Jct\¡:Bc)c!crU1)cq)

EOJ

EqJØ

Ou?c'')ON

(LoCJL

=i=r.El.L

q-ro

àCJ

o(J(^-oElaJ)P:Èj'-

:uìc

=oroU1CJ(troU

lEl-c!L)]L:roÌcJt. ttr(J

L

c))c'¿=co(J

U)avL(us)vloIL

ro

=roI¿)fo

_oro

ào¿J(nU)

=a.)cCJL

l¿(Jroco

Uo

P

Ec(]EoLq-

gruEAJ

Orf)Ol\o

t+

Ola.)+JrULptn!cfolnf¿)ro1-JU''1)cOJ

ECJ

EOtnOJL

co+Jç.Lo-cl--(,o

J)-ocru

EoL\rgfoECJ

CJ

o-p

=EOqOìc'')Fl

{+

U)()JU)

,(¡)

lo'É+)lcloil¿tL:o=OqOlcf)r-l

&

tr?O-\¿()fucû

Qo1)

E=!cruLoEqJ

Eto-c(n.c(t)Ctl.c!cq=

O|f]ilOtOF{

{+

cc)o_

E-cogPulOØ(uQJcË gìOrsY/Ë ¡:FOJ'

EgÞõ! E!c=uQJØo Qc.r

-(JL!2 oJ ro(ULô+l^äifu*oõ p .r,, õ6P '--

= ôN

8 toa) 9'õL>c) u)€Eõ> to_tn oE0JeC3E 'UçE.gHgrg Y/ oJf -_Oõ^,^òRe! v.r¡c >.c¡gLC.)- qjc

ã à!'-(JP'r.96L(J(N

prU

OJU)

=Lo(Þ0)p(gJ)U)

CJ

-c+J))Ø.crUolrU

U)

EIUõc.)L

ØELo(J,OLQ.)

'pto

14g)c.)

!cru

tfo(JQJN

,gE .o'- L'-prupOOLr)tr)ññF{ 0O(\

1)IU

OJU'\

=Lorr-AJ

l)ñptn0.)

-cp+JØ.cñC')ñ(n

E(o(J

o)L(t!Lo(J()LqJ

Ðro

.9OlOJ

!cfu

t:fo(JAJN

rUcro

LotL.ru ILp (¡,)-oE-o cJro:i: þo c_)t)ØC ¡-,

L

pOH-L

IUo)LC(lJ'- -OE(L),O t¡l çôØ¡o(') ts

- v

-õ gd> o-c)

Dru c)

;'r: gØo:llU-(L(J-CJ

E H_;o.rgF--(^(l,) cDOFtr r-c õ-OnrL-LYÑp5È e

rL

gE,Þi9Ets

=,siãp6 E s,-rÈ p gi.=.^L

Ë s ü g#s I Hg;q')'=c (g o)Lv¡u--ru qJ'= È Xu-o 5 cJ v

LOJ+)Øoç-cfu

J)fOJL

l¿(Jroco

t)o

{J

(o

c, o.)

t'\t^ìCrl

,¡9OJ .L-p

.ü8

.q .roLL

JJp

c')QJL]Ll¿ :-\¿(J t(Jru fgco cô

U(J_c _cJ)Ð

==a.)(uL)(JEC0.) a.)LLeeccoo(J(J

OLN

Ol\o

c")

<f\AJJU''.(,rU'Ê1)c

:o,.l¿:Lo3

r-{t-

ç')(I)Ð(UL1)lnìì

iCJ]Lì-v, (_)fuco

CJ

-c1)E,oJ..CJ.c

. a.)'Lc),(Lco(J

ìl

OO00Na\l

ULc)o-OJ)-tfUpU)

c.)_c-1rpU)C'roU)loØEfo(J

o.l)!O

J)rloi 0.):LlheE.Þ

à8ËX' aJ ct).Y - 'r=lo aJ:È>oJi¡.E L

-rulo.foõ (J

r= Oì OJorgtL

-vEùË,otucôf cJ

f!u 8e9oP-N-:= >lzËEË

lo ro m

tootr) Ln

:od, ÑlO. FlNLO

LCJÐ(¡-ñòQ)

:o(J.2E

lotJ),arcJ'E

AJCJc

_c(JL(uCJar,o)L

lt!]E,o c-¡,c Lro fF'.ortr;(Jc.\ 0.)o)F0)ãrroff.:õtn u)

ì

rO,?tI\r Cr)

c(uo_oOJL

1-)c0)Ec)

JJO(,/)

(LoCJL:fftr\ÞLa)Ð(¡-tgcroo-foL

JJ

col¿LoB

Otr)cdON

O

CJEtruU(J

joJJ:=fuEc)!cfuoLLoã-cPts

rg(Jtnf1rro1¿tf)c.)L

l¿LJftrco

ri-c+J

=c)(Jco)LCJ(Lco(JOqOlcnr{

(tlc.l)OJ(t)OL

ruL1)CJL

(Jlo

-c,lt

=CJ(JcQ,)LOJ(Þco(JOulOl(O c\i

c'l i

co

{#OLN

'-{ S- N rO

{+l{#O\O

l--r-{O(\lr)Ntr)O

{+O\r-l

l--r--lONLN(\Tr)O

OqOlcr)r-{

J&

O(.lO

Þ\r--lOc{ï-lì--l

tr)O

OqOf..crl

J&

OqN

f.-r-lOc\(\e\roO

OqooN(\

{+Os,:O

{+-{+ {# {+ {+ {+ {+'râ-

OOC\ r-ldd

OOqryL.)O

O.O O--rqn$OO

Or-lO

O.ON r-)O

OOl(')OO

Itrr-{O(\r{O

fr. Nr-t r-lO,ONrNO r-'lnÕ cfltr)lf)OO

I

l.rr-lONr--lcnLr)O

|ttNF.l F{OO.\N(o00?-{ r+LO LOOO

Ir. N l-\r-l Y-l r-{OOOc! (\ c{\f uî OìN r-l rlLNlf}LOOOO

fr. lrrr-l ?iOO(\ (\N,rOf'{ otr)If)OO

ñr-F-l FlOON(\N c'-)(J (J

Lôlf)OO

l\ïlOrNr--lOLNO

f'.r-{Oa\vr!LOO

\r-{O(\Oef)t-.)O

vz<\¿ ô_

oLUV

oLU:¿o-

LLT(Jo-

l-\i+Or\tr)e\LOO

:¿Éflco>TT5\¿CJU(Jo- o-

or.rJ < <VÔ-ô-

\¿

\l ô-o- o-o-


-ñ*Þ-)Ø õ¡-p€-=õ.j:E'olcJ {, c_)

P ot -lJcJvcØ-. 1U-LrUtr\¿:sb9" gtn-C (JoË'-(r>pqJ>'9LC-Oc.¡.9 øt¿Eb!i!bg#õ- -o srvt oJ

f ar-õ\o oàt-.¡

>U)úra0)>\\P--.fir lgtuL-Pc-¡õräaJøü!or^*uè# eE.P:ro-c tsâç.9 õ:r-l u)v(u0),^>È9ijõsiü6õgEB

È--:o.9L(oP(oCJ

cÕ

=(JcoqJ

Øj

=l(J].Øl-o:e:o:cirAìoi=.Ø:Ø

'-iOJL

zz-0.)

.9

OJ

E

Eo

F

o.=.(u-oqJ

E(uL

E(uOJP(õb¡o

LUJ'tf,C

ou-o

-c.t3co,õt^f,(J

-o

to

E(U

AJL-

Cp bL

-.O ç _ Y

ËEËE*E Þ5 8gËõ >9pc')cX-H.\cO ro ü 'ro r. f-

^-Lf'lEËã 6ã:v t rU ÌO ç,rUs:EF5ic,*!:e-Cã

gEËE:EEËÏP,'Ev

- L ^G> t .9 ât1o

iqEt)."8,9frP,a3Ø õÈ otr'j=

l.:: Ëåeç ! õ ¿iri oE PÈ 3 g,sf-L(Dot-,

Ê F ËÈ I Ë-rr¡LvCJtia--9+*l

5 E E"€ eg'=Sõ-oçëE eöË r g8 <n - Ë .9 u,

ËE Ëi =3ãE CJ Ø[l Ø Ø

Þ p

o-.cJ'-v LF

r8= õt ,¡.õ Bc c* (u!Opv)(u.--o.ø õ I->c,P I b^àoofi\.ft - oJvu-rUUlr-C9 õ ú ã.!:g.p m pc'l cJYci'q F ¡ sËÞþPËOJ* LD Ø O

-1-- .P E 3to-c.-FJ.r^L-L

v: ^ F¡_ U È áì{J ru.! rU y!e--)ZRFØsEãî-;5 roÍöÏse.j-=VuiIUP-J!L<^Ln O Ãr:-lJt ûã e E.9.¡, .- Ë,P'-^LrOrjNaiOÏ -S -:, o-EË-t=ooQo>*^:F; ß 6 ñq'2 r I _ vv

9.Þ-.ll.pa.-Ð^ruJ

E õ#3FF

E 5ö: 2p È-,o., F # ã

rE:CË ËË Ë;;CpËoHå 9E F;;HE.99 e 5 Ø'= g õg'glgEs¿e Ee ËsX3õ3Ån¡ ;i üËËgË=ËF: #Ë ËiËËÞFgaã gg es,îË

iËÞËë EË EËËËPtrbts' õx È9.Þ.:ËIiEg ;E äËEÈ{38-'sE FË ËEËE

lËfitË¡ueåË¡åI Es Ig^E3gõ:3R

ËË 3ËËãi Ë ig ëËäq=t;- t ro'5^!'>¿- 9çâ0J fll O ^ 0J h qJ LO O qJ O i- L'.J q L U L U L VL L ! _ IU V

OIJìNc!\i-{+

OqF{

OlfÌNtr)F{

{+

Nr-lONr\(\LNO

Itì--{ON!-{e.ltrlO

Nr-{ONNr-{LalO

Oúll'rrnrl{r}

OulNcnoo

++

OqOOl@

OqO

Oulf..(\sí-

{+OqY-l

t.FlOr\Nr-{LNO

OLN

ñcoc'-)

O\Fl

f.-Ì-lONì-lr-{Lr)O

Otr?(\ooc1

üO\r-l ,

f-.Ì-+ON$

LNO

f..i-lONNULNO

I

O\O

O\O

OLrlr-{

f-rÈOC!oor-lr.r)

f-.ì-{ONLNF{

Lr)O

co

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

U

co

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=(Jcô

=(J


cvl

glqJproL

¿JU)

co'tnØCJU)

ro'oqJo_ttEcroLoE!qJ

OLôñor\o

{#

EörovE--P- L

EE;H-#ø n ö o-ÏtÈ'b b Y

i=sËäËËg'rFøg;-U:-l-c i ãè roFcoE(oFY õ õg0)l--oY---(J . >-O^tE(9 - ojc\ onì.LI rì ^ 0J v(LO_¡itl\_C u-tst¡-r:9 Ë9'ruË.9õ'o"Eãiu0JOqbË-9o*€-rF6: q

Ë:ã &# Þ,aL-:-^

õ.o-Ea¡c.t(J B,o Ë:J0J 0J c-+.{ or- ø.o E õ.çP {tr !n rouE_E B E ãdEru o-.Y r-c:\¿Øro>c!=td E E ÏË;E F ä'G'< Eg CI pio_ p

õE ã m: *ø $a Ë'q EEÈ"_àbf

Eh¡Jo_ ÈL.o i-o C*ocQU)! lû >

PS E IEiH:osË&91.-l õ oEeEgå,9 9 0=q)ljP^o_ o c.YØoàT E Eg cio E

ãEìsØ>c=:tr: PP<çYrVñ5lõ s'ËO-lO .L .'

EËhä--DLJ.È C

Ë¿È s). - - '*EË.ÞaË.9õ-LL:l! o lo .(uv¡ [L o- ¡-

:OQ)Prv-LL'E¿- O_O

Ë,S g '*= 8-? * s E'ctbËüsElõaã.b

,4(EO'õvcJ l¿o_uØ ro,o COìPoJ L),€s):bF>tr8d)U)-p

b sËs'€ #'= LlcJb,L(')o -c iìoo SJ a.)eËR-aJX-oØ=geås.ñ e,?Þ "a=!

='-u1U=.q0., t'-L '\1.:g ñ-'uÞ '-r iË-vO

il uÈñ3,9I"gt! 9:h5ãr¡V)E'õ I

l

O]Oo ]toci toiN i(ocf,

i

{+ {+

lEe Ë .tr39Ë G p E I-€Pig,e;! -v o

ËäËËËËg Ë Ë åüägü:Et : Ë ;:;å;HE; 5 Þ F1ú:5isp E c Y

:Þ õEu*,P rs E E

5ËgEE;Ë .p Ë *HË:sHËã Ë E P!l E'-- .)z ø cJ s L !ù5;€üç: :, i,sEE,äså:iëË H*EË:'=-e# s Ë 3 9, p Ë s E H eË qg H E € Ë Ë Ë + E : e

Ëg*äËËä üEül!ËË :: åË 9i " F Ë e Ë * g

ËËE:ËëçËr5F€ã.Eú::ÞiE=6RBs;:ã,se r:t Ë E q åE r È e ç Ë

E Ë E € T E g É ;€ "ãE Ë Ë

OUlc\NOr

-{+

¿)cq.)

E()Tl-rCJøQ)Lrg(J

LOpU)otÊc)LU''ro'Ëo:tiEO

J)looJ e)m=>roOJ,-or:2 aJL-rooI c-r

Pfõ _-o>.:9u)<-õLfo :ope(rõì c.¡o)-.-)):=OJruL\L

Otr)ñi+Ì-l

OqLOootr)

&

OroñNoì

{+

f-.r--lONOlr-l\oO

NY-{

a\c'-)r-{\oO

\FlONNF{

rOO

Ou)a{r-lr+

OqOs-r'-

OOLT;c!oì

Otr)ft-NN

OFl

c.;

OqN

OF{

+OFl

ci

N?-{

ONo')(\\oO

OqN

l

NrìO(\Lt)0LOO

{âOU]r-{

l'.t-+Oa\jtÕ\oO

\¿ãv

f.-r-lONN0\oO

LLTU

Þ-r+O(\FlO\oO

LLTU

co

=Um

U

ft!-{

Oc\LONLOO

co

=U

@&{â-òoòU]qqo\í-tr)

{+OLN

dOï-l+

f'rì--{

\Fl

ONc'-)c\

ONLNr{u)O

lr)O

Êo

=Uco

=UcoàUo_

vV


ÊLo-g.FE

- Ln '-r .X rog€.9 Þ -"9 ot= 5.ruoJP tu'=.-o--c F.L-i'H õ >-Eà ö^k o

-!-co:l¿ = '-,L (ult J v

- L

O v >.L JP: Põ EõNrYhç-'.íÍJ*{¡!vLÁ!-Ë5E:PeU)Ã(JCJãu).Yu;ycJØrol=FØ(,O(i)i- Q) Ø LoOrotrlP¿-c'iJ: - Lôl- oJ .(u (D o' ou f o_.ñ Ø QJ C vv

- O-'if nt\\J(¡i-ìYPEçÞã

ßl-

È E : ä R=!

- -.ÈÉvfOt-l< qJ fq o-¡ \-vP iñ u = or

EE E I g 6hìrr c-¡ c: o ä!vL=

- e bR 3àL.¡JljJru.=P lq bico= c'PY,i, s;e>-YL.,-_OË^pnõ5toFEEPËË; å Bf E Ë

q)pIDpf-:fovpø9u|=:.-qìõ.Lc-s '=LCftr:UI (IJ

9ä8EJ-Éõ_pUA

JJó

Epc-bRu cftco)(t{J

(ttgà9-l.c 00

Lrr -ôËdpÈ

9üF3'õ-."ñSE;(rL-LJAaJo.=O-(JËXrr ts(I)OE

tqJo-XCJ

gì.cÐLrOoto)L

õlnc=oCJ

O)c'6oôoocoLl{-

,o-

rro

'Oil4trorEtaJic.¡]Nrà.tocro

fg

=CJ

(lJL

Fl

-;1)c(.)

Ea)J)OJU)

\LoQJL:ffU(L

LCJÐ(¡-ro

bq)

o(J.9EC'lcc

rQ)o-o.t

:CJ.L

:EJ:L

:lnjl¿:LtcJr(Jl3ru

rEo]Lg-

õL

J)Lo(F

-E(JfoCJL

JJfoOqoìc'-)rl

'@-

LO1)rno(L!.(u

U)oo_oLo_OJL

cg

c'l !-

HCJõ(9(,L

-q8¡=>Pa(sL

fttØcc.9.gÐ-ottroetr-:¿ .!(J>rg tgm(,u.9--OEC'5 ro

orEuiO-LõçL,(/)OJ ì:

=roc|ELJc)

:olLOI00

1O]Nl

{+

copfgLtoo-a.)Lo-fUL¿)q-otnflJro

PU)

OL

l¿L)fU

co

U_cl-

=OJIc(JLc)(LCo(JOt-l-)

o;(O

&

OJpto-oo_f

4(nf+Jro1)U)

Pc^cJ FlE-j(uvffrúõ'cUDP

eä_ \¡:E:_(t._ru ru>.¿rsã-o+or:¿ .cc)-ol !21!,L:f>r-ì :=

'.9bLPn) ulÈe_(uÐLq-rg -cL(J-oL

ruiì aru?EY.L

OroñNt

{+

U)f1)ropU',

c)Ø(o(Jc)LLCJELotfo(JoJ)

SE#8_'-.u1aJ S.)

!LcJ ru '-E þ'bE EHts90-¡uÈ.u)cjtr-4 (n rOrg.ß6r-uVtPc;gl,uEÐì-O 0JCc c:^

o crl5 EvcJ o- ,^

ÉEE

pcAJLruo_LCJpØo(LLoco-copØro

=c)L

QJ

.N(tlQ.).PfE^{: 0OØri-ì õl'cr-{ P

.,,EQi c.)

deopufoLn-o,Ê.. 'ÐfØ&.9XOcJp"o 14CJ 'Ø

HAJJJ(Jre

+ÞOtnñor(o{+

:rU(JUI!l õ.-K gEu.\ (D (ucLco-0)rn IõNäOì '- ). ).ÌLPñL

= àoËrus x;; Ë(JL=L

:: Ø O-'"-J -

VC.ECJSc'E c Ë'9 ñ

Þ 8-Eõ €Or-Oô i¡Eû; Ë reX;E .9Eö'g9 õ'UË ôP E,9Þ a-,t_tuvrH9 Ë EE Ë=^L'eÈ oo roç õa i-ol*.-

ü çfiÈ9E6'ÈEt rgãE ûAö!#c'Ee*Eü;äigroc(J-=Fs 3 h õ.= g.

sgpõÞE

op:toEOJ

Fl--co'6tnOV)

rU'õ(uo_tn!crU

lno_GJ

JJU\¿)X0.)cOJL

toEroÍuVci-cIJ

=co'6tf\=(J

.Ø-(f

('lc

to

CJL

=o(J

c

cro

CJLfgo-AJLo_

Ou'ìf'-O\o

O\N

OU?r_{

O4Nsi-NtÐ-

Onr-{

:

f'. l

r-+'Ora\l\\orOcoO

f-.F{

Oc{r-lFlooO

co

=(J

f'-riO(\Oil

00O

coBO

câ

(J

O4Ncncn{+

OOL,? qO"t Ol\o c'-)

Fl

OOO'r? q ulNOI.T-r <- c{tr) Ln \i-

{+ {+oo-:ryOO

Or-lo.;

OOOns: qC{ N r--{

I'tF{.

.O;

i-lf\

@O

ftFlOc!r\Or-rO

f-\ N I-\r-l i{ ï+OOONNT\f'- O cO-i-+O\o \ lr.OOO

|\t Þ- l'.r-l i-{ FlOOONc\.\c) .-r LflC{OO\o \o roOOO

{+ {+{#Oc!O

l'.FlONcor--{

ooO

l'.FlONOertcoO

OOOnno?C\OO

co

=<<(J o- o-

co

=<<(J o- o-

co co Êo

===(JUU


J)(no.u q_I o- àp,^(J'v)=o

-cf=pÉ'c B E ; Ëc:"LØO¡j

.E¿Ë E"*:þ€5 .ei?Ëo-lo u 9-

Ll.-^

v'¡ -.c ç ='ro'> b'; € dñm'EGJ-(/)v8.EE ,Ef sO-.r Ø y - rgro'F' :î -tú>_'= ci v -Ç uL >-ç _c (J C ^.9kË E:.,9n3 E e 3 6 33OEOLL¡¿'----.=.É--cglaJ o_Jç 9-o.-¡'Ë äg b EËeõ gÞ E+ H.3-.=t õoYo.9 'E > .L ! è.¡-9s I u

= sì IE i; E: ä;rs:Jr= H - Ø L

EEË.søsE,oõI.'lqrFÞËf l*9åãe aH E# 8 E E E ËLôFl.-'ff'u:oCq) 9-9 Ho o ø õ(J-C-!ÈCLnr'¡l

C (U O_c ^6 fO I UE

= J: I Ë'> Y ø fe È Ë F'> 6 õ Püêt=)Y:=.<#.=Ëgg:9EtÉË=8

J)cc.)

Ec)ÐÞa)U)

OJ

:lo(J

OJ(JcOJLCJ(+-

,crO.()ìO-.f

'=oõ(LAJL

ØLCJ

.{.JCJo_ULro

=top.arc:forfro'L.\LØroE

raJ

to!cOJç'|rgAJL

l¿(Jroco

(Jo1)

roECJ

O4oìrO

&

a)(JcAJLCJ(i-co(J+)cCJ

E(u

=Þ(utttt:f

J-)(u]-,Ø(¡-oAJ(J'Foc3G)

QJL

OtrloirO

OF{

d

La.)

oCtìc:f!O-c](J)u)¡,.oirl

CJ

=LEqJlJcc.)

Eru

=G)

(¡)L

OLÔ

oiLO

or-{ci

cop(Jc=càfo.gEõLo_

-c(JLroG)UIc)L

OOcdr-lro

E -3e € P g

mlËsi ã Ë nË õ

ä3ËËË"E F åËg È

leËg:Efl Ë ËåË ë€sHEÈ_sË É qv: H

[Ëä*ËÞË E pec-åE;åEË.EF H S;g?;uËËäÞËË ã IËçeËãEsEe;g-b 5âEEHe É àä E E 93 a ¡ E E Þ ¡P.¡ TãF F ÉÞ8.,:T P3;aË F0ËË: Eå: p;iEË*:çbesÈ Ís FtËIgH'Ë1Ë3g HËE E:Ë5çEËË Iç3

Ë;EEËËËåËlååËåååOtr)ñNN

OqOlN(O

O4N(O

OqO@i-l

OLN

ñr-ltf)

{+O(r?(\

fr.i-lON@F-{

ooO

l¿(JfU

co

(Jo

JF)

Ecro

EoLq-:to(JCJco-co_a)a.)p

Oqoìcnr-{

O. O : Orf) o tno', d Ñ\Or N (L, c.l

NJ)Or.to!o-'{# {# :f {#

Or-{+

Nr-lOr\coOOlO

Oc\r'{

O...!cn

NFlONlr)OOlO

OF{

ci

+&O]Oc..! nOO

TTÉÉ*ÍÍÍ

co

=(Jcô

=()co

(Jo-

Tco

(J

coè(J

cô

=(J

OOOO C'-)

OO F{ C\OO

ftFl

f-.r-l

NT\r-l FlOOc! c!oo a!O '--{O) OìOO

N:NFl : r-{O.ONrNcnrLoi+ i-{

O) 'OìOO

ññr-l FlOONN-\ \\N !-rUËO) OlOO

¡.,ïl'ON(O.UOtO

f-.r--{ONtf)r-{coO

l-rr-tONc'-)a{coO

O(\OlïlOlO

O(\\oOorO


-ocrU

c.o.¡JoEco'+)(JcfcLlrt.cr.E:õ.Lto-tcJiL:g,(J

L;lo. a.)

U)0)L

OJõN c.)>- o_'iõ o-gfuro>EErU:f. CJçoQJE'< 0J¿DCJêL.=

Oqtr)Flcl

{ûO\r:Fl

f'.rlOc\?-{

Õ(\r-l

gIU

E(u

6.c!c=\LQ)L

çIìa.)1¿

-loõ.:'F u)Oetoco-.ofø,li'? > CJ

co!2.=o a)c(t-:f'-n)È>ÈPt- lnrÞ'= c

=EI.E .E o-rõE-äü Êc-) .'=L\Lut'ê.ç.,9 bU-ooCeroõ>ïEs- 9-oO(L--tnõ::ro(ottrtroõ õÈOOqqLn oì\r cf)

F{

OOF{ c\cno

3(ucLo(Fo.)

.¡Jro!o_

=,o¿)c'o,EoEco'r=(Jc:fÊ

Lro.ctr:OLo-

(LoDq-rUL!L

l.oLo

.¡J

l-oc)!c_ro 6ìIQJ QJ'U) Pr'> gC)p.- (/)

Ou]NO)\o

co'+)(Jc=.càfg.c,-Ea)Lo_Lo\FU)(J.=Etoc)Ec)L

.9<n

focru

crgT

=OOJL

OOCJOì

0.)(J1)oc(t)U)rt

I C,l.Dq-

fU,LE,cJ

UI.'>

c.)

:O,LO

ñFI

:rl

l

.u):Ø,fg(Jo

:¡J

CJ(JpocG)L

l¿(Jroco

()o

¿J

ECro

EoL(L

groECJ

Otr)

co'+ttucc.)-cp.g)JUIc)

=oòrgroØc)q)roLAJ

ro

_v\f

=õco:tr-ocfULo

J)UIUq-

Oqoìcf)f-t

oìcE:\Lo+),tt'o,(). o.)

L

,rt(t)

IIJcroCJL

CJ(J

Efu

=oz<nì0)z.eto

ro

=rot:tr] O.l.L:¡¿:(J'ñim;(Jo

¿J

ilocCJ

U)

E'ro

E(Lotoo_o_

=Ø.ça)()cCJEq)

Ec(gU)1)c'roo_EoU

OOl.r;coLr)

&O\oñ

OJl¿CJN'=roEE=tt!cIUtnpcc.)LrUo-Lc.)

)PU)lo

r(F

,E,oL.(L;(h]rgì(Jl(Êiolu(ú-cCJ

oN->rUClo!crU

BOJ

(uL

nFl

(tlE:çruL1)

too_o-ftn

co'pruELoq-.c(Êo

l¿(Jrg

EcfutnTo-c+)

=(a)(Jc

tnñN$

{+

.-ìIctìo.)

P

So¿JJ-lln ol(U-UÒ ,=3Ëar9L_

gt {9ccrO QJ3hIo-<arpùË$ ,¡,

EE!-c.Hi9oÈÐ)coL

Pbi- -cr-t(9.Ë

\Lfroc)',p(uCi-À.=Jf¿_o_cc..P o3 -:¿_Lruq(J5

(FcJoLo>

LLOTU-oECJç(J=õØL .rCJ /--rq- t\co-(JltøFdrofg rolJ \,/

.:ì ci 6-ol-cJvÐ_

Fì=hË -= 9-lc) .'iJ *Lp^0J CrYF g¿õõõ>U O---rËilLLa') (J<CcHLLIIq) aJ=frE<QJ(I)ØØ"ljEb IfgccFOC)ÍO (/) nì:Ø)rËfu-Êl¿(Jô..(.ôõôcp^ .- cVn0J-LNClt1.L:v(lJqui-bØäí(J\l õ

Oulr\cr)cY-)

{+

ft?-{

ONLN?-l

OlO

U)co'6ØJ(J.9E1rEa.)

Ec)J)o)tt(uL

roEfurtrvdËoL(L

Ecfgo

)J

Ø'(o

EOJ

EEää;ì- >ìH ru

õ' j H.€ c! 0,¡ o.)ñ v U¡.# -'i- Cåu'E3 :a

=3 Fõ o¡ Ë'* rõP.,q õo o

:ÕÈÞ õ: E

BSüË si ùr 5 olo ! c--ìÃc)(JfCJØu-L'f-XË -,Þ -c b .9Y'=c- E= !28õEE ãE Ë*FìËõF 9E .ÞËy OJ.< L _r_ (JFËõF H¡ EËËE+å Ëfi :ÉEiÈ;i ;, Ë;Ë5ËË EE EEiãsE E3- P3li9: Eþ i=cr: õ.9 ä P^- õfipÉB ,u,Hq=.cH È Ë g Y ç;å Eüg 8¡ ¡.E Ë:EE.; .i HA'E ðgÀ3-_ ro iñ-.+.È =€€.E)È þ È õ: gE Ë Ëb: o õ h - e; EÈõ g àõ û.e I E I sã ø c orl4 =Ø E c

[e;HgHrçosOqLOt

@

ONd

ftrr-lOa!LNÕc!F{

f'- l'.F{ F{

OOc! (\(\ c'lF-l r-l

C) Frr--l r_-{

fr. lr. l.- l.rr{ 'ï-l r-l F{O.OOOc! '(\ (\ c!t\ -\ -\ -\

\O \O 0O .-rON--rÌ{-\ -\ -\'\OOOOF{ F{ F{ i+

\\F{ r-{OOC\ a\,1

cn\J-r-{ Fl

Or OtOO

OqLNFlan

++

Os,:Fl

OqLr')rÐFl

{+OIO

l-rr-{Oc\Nr-lOìO

Ou'lNLO\o

{+Oqt\

\ï{Or\F{

r-{OìO

{+úr {+'(l} €tl &erO$O

OFl

C;

OLr)

c;Oc!c;

Oc{c;

Oqï-l

Otr?ì--l

co

=(Jo_

mco

==(J(JcÊ co

<<==Èo-(J(Jco co

==UL)co

=Uco

=U

l'.?-{

Or\jsÕolO

cñB(J

Nr-lc)c{r-lC\orO

co

=(Jco

=U


1)OJLc'l

.9 -oLfo- _oooJlJ>c) 'rJL:flo L)o_ 0JCXb0r(JC-1) '-E c.)93EOJaJhECo'-(n q-

é:.Lc!fËPurccJ fuL

-PCeAJFEõ.96lE:OÐØo.+)E-CLnrg(JpJoJq('laJ-oL=p^-o S¿^-,, ;'qL-lv

Põu=-Ø

aJ\ULf>(9re8.'9Þ

OqONc.,l

{+O.!Fl

oor-lOrNLNOr-{O

coBU

3-0Jõ 5 Ël?v

tî=>Lo ¡v

- .\(tsaú)=^v'-u^r

oJ P ('r 'ã'ì--o Q) iÁ-oO- f r

îLô(J(JI-.YocØ0Jt ôro fi cõ o-- - h. o t A+ãr.^ OJ ,1 E.õ ö E _=rgH r g îe õã E bùÞ h

f :; sg ;,q= ÞÈuEvir* È fUA,!|AJ O Q) QJ- ^r_HãC,Y

F åg ¡ Ë ee Èãifl Þ

2 Èã Ës#-Ð.-u-t =EËc nrouc!roÙó,l- O ro!- ni--Ë.frJto(UÈPg bE ÞJ.=LFñ!.=geiEiue.-e6ËEA; gE aJP

={, rr lf¡ :lj l(,C c L, 0,)-r !uo ru.rutu

Päã;sj F:-E E:ErocJc.uloV-LLP-crufuc^'QJUØfUCJ(I

O'Ln.ñ\Olu)

v).Otr)ñ

coFlOc!$0FtO

co

=U

(L

c'j=ro(JlEtc)(JLo(¡-UI

4Jca.)

EfC')LfU

!cfU(u(¡to(J

EU)'+)

ËaLv

!robgEõtrD fgE¡'-o>_.1:LJfoucO=LFc)=p(n ,=

OqLNc'.)FI

{+OqO

cor-{ONaÐÕ?-{O

co

=U

c)N

ruCru c.)

L,-l _v-u9cPlo F{ ru0,) vr:fo-U^-oÈ^>ôr=!- e

-.9 -',oc-l'-::oi4-þEñ.E o jr PrX-O ø (fiþCqJ

5€EEETtrarúO-O+!røY

(J-c{ ã-vüÈ8sgE! èrooPrNv-à r¡ '-lrO C_CC fupi .e'EY'ãcro

= .S¿

ãõg>.roõ(UL:LpU

OrflIr.FiLN

++

Oo?N

00r-{Oa\cor-{i-{O

co

=()

:ro(J

OJ(JcQJLCJq-co(J(uLtnLo.)

.¡JOJâ-ULruto1)Ecfo

EoL\L

Ø'ro

ECJ

OqOìc'lFl

++

O,O-::ryO:O

@ co,00r-{ r-{ 'r-{O O.Oc\ a\ a\'\'\t\\<- F{ rLnC\j r-{ r-{r-l rl r-lOOO

OJ

EEroLOJV'E(u

!

Lfo¿)(nOL

CoJ)cLo

_cFcfu(,o¿)Ecrg

EoLq-(n'ru

ECJ

Orfloì\o

{+

o-

tnJ+JrU

lJU)

OLl¿(JromU-cP

=OJ(Jco.)L(uq-co(JO(JcOJLOJ(Èco(JroLpCJLo_

foc(E

(Lo()LJ

'l=oc

=qJ't(.)L

O4Ol\o

++

Or-ld

o-

ooF{

Oc{c!Lo

LJ)CJU)

c)()c(uLOJ(+-co(JfoL

{J(l)Lo_

q-o(u.9.l)oc

=CJ

CJL

OOOl01r-{

{#ONO

i:oo 00r-l r--{OO(\NNOIr-l r-{i-{ r-lOO

EruopoLLoE_cl-_

=:ro(J

o.)(JcOLo)(Lco(JOqOlc.)r{

{+O(^\O

+Jcc.)

E0)pfo

{Jtn

tfur'=pc)Lo

rlOrCL:ø,1);clfut!:ci(urrL: C.)r!

=(u(uL

lJc(u

'E;QJtutoJJU)

IUc\ts

r-{

'jorAJ1)rUL

J)Øco'+)lo(J

(EE(u(JLo(FtncoFfU(J

q--ooE

_cfJ'=-ocfoLcrl

l¿(Jlo

_o

rof

]JL)ñ(ÞOOc;rOcr)

{+OIF{

l\?-|

O(\r--{NN

cô

=(J

AJ+)Eo_fEcfÞq)(n'ta)L

r-{./c.)

EroU)

AJL

co1)Ø

o-_cin3co'(,a=(J

.(/)!

q

('ìO.lJ(oL1)U)

co'Ð(Jcf

.càtu.cEõLo_

q-oØJ

.¡Jrg1¿U)(JL

l¿(JoCJcfoI;-c:1J3:fuLJ-ocroL

,gc)Lroo_CJLo_

IJ¿):o rocú)ro 'oì

Ø(u. c-(9.9 Ivul.--U1 PF-UõõqrdrLôUl€ E(JuL

r¡ c.¡ f='rutlE9 >.arEbì-cJoJVLôP

E e.gÐ(n3,G:Eh0ãÈ Foì .-]:ji<blu -.¿ '-385õ P-:¿EõbQJI >

8løRHE:-p t-:ñtLron."Oc- Ofo+õE--àõ F-olËõõJIOr'= o!aÉ.3

Oqror{c'l

{+O<,:ï-l

Þrì-lONsr-lc!rl

co

=U


(o\itn

.¡JcfoEro

]-tcOJ

EOJ(.)LO)IU

Oqro?-{c,î

&Oqr-l

ooFIOa\

NilO

Êo

BU

¿-,c(J

EqJ

J)OJU)

!crg.+)thQJ:fua)L

¿JCJOlrof

_oopC,JLfuo_Eo(J!cfU

U)too_q)L

tCJo_XOQJN

foCfg

-c g E P= -ä¿çr;i EË= Ë".åEfiEË ã38 ËËË#eF; *ÈE :eEËE!E Ë;e ËË

ËäËt$ Ëçå ËË#e!*"t ôEI ;äËëEEÈlËåË Ë äHaåfrFEg;ç [Èc.¡Ër.N-j +F'= 0r Ë's)

åFEËÈäF öFI3Ë

ËËËåËEËEÊeåå

ËgåEgËË;åËEËOqONr\

-(â

Oc..!

ao

oor-lO(\00r-lr-{O

co

=(J

Otr)ñc")00

{+OI(.-)

oor-{ON\oil

F-lO

côB(.)

Þ.-p Þs ,nq õ YÅts u,n

ùE AE :ì r¿8bÉ €Ê.- :È"sËs'ã: ä.tË eFsr!Eg ÞË* u¡tËT{Ê ,qEË E9;Ë¡fiã, ã3r EËä;H

Ëå äå5uä fiËgËL L :ì v_ C - - F v, lU.9-- -öx.9hq-õÈçË

åE Ëäi ËËåËË Ë

iE gEËËËfË€È

ËË"g ËËËË F##EÈÉ,;ËrËËË¡EEãË : E F E Ë € È Ë Ë Ë E3

*äEBIË gË ËgËå;E8Eá=E;88áòssOulNsIt

Oc'-)

cÐ

ooÌ-{ON(\r-{Ì-lO

coàU

OqOcor-{

++

OoqO

ooï-lONr-lilF{

O

co

=U

OroñorN

{+Oo?r-{

oor-{Oc{OFl

ilO

m

=U

ËsC .l-pEË0rØo_ul-crua ur^fU C'J(u:= j

o-5ùcE --CCJto:."dP:=-a>ug-(L5 0:ocJ-q)ã 6Ere(L).r õ -c 9..9-E 6rsuE! U rì

:Ë€tu (, -o

Eb E

R }Eru-- ru -oòFç-9=c)¿3eoõXg8E.CEE

OqOcr)\o

{+OoqN

@i-{Or\OlOr--lO

co

=U

Ag.rO--cooo+) '_ú

E9ai!(J '=r(J r-

o>Øcln'=rot(Jõ

9äF-c.'-úrocõ92\¿õ.o_ocoop'= glL:J 0.)FPOtYp,jì (,N q'¡

.L

qùbo¡6 L)jcfUn\/ i:

ci ;-c -cJ) -p

==ccoo'6'6v) tn:ff(J(J.(2 .ØOQ


¿J

.(/,

UItnOJc*l3fucrEa)p(U!o_

=!clI]AJLfuo-c)Lacop'-tn

oo-CJ'ro

oco'procol'õq)!qJLfUo_qJLo_

Olf]fr.f-{

N

c.)

.cE

Oìc=(ÞLo(L(nco

l'r=tfgici.9ìØq)'Ifco1)'6olo-

lqJ1C

rfgCo'{=!-oro

=toJr>I Q.).Lì

OOoiN

c.,!

J-)cc)EOJ)OJIJ)

c.)L

cEUciop!cro

EoL(L

Øro(J

QJco-coc.)

CJ.p

Oqolcr)ì-l

fUc.)!P€,-c.X

OJ

!cro))cOJ

]Et(JÞc)(î)

AJL

v)fJ)ropU)

ìo:L'l¿(Jroco

Uo

1Jli-oc

troEoL

\L

U)'ro

Elqr)

cEUcio

1J:fo(Jq)co-co_c.)

õÐita.)L:lØoõ

,U)-o\oNo)fL

roJJcCJ

ECJ

o_o-JU)

-ltl$-.F.cfU

o_

=c)'tAJL

OqorclF{

{#

Øco'¿-tro

=.g.1)(,pc'õ

t-çlcifu(,JJ'ã^ÈoqXVQ)Ø,_c.q .oL!¡J iJ.r c.)

c{ -o:oñ-\be'tr iú:o -or-C<:fu f

3E.P^l

rú L)occrn (E ruUur/lÉ. o l--lI t'c -O-c:oEË põl:õ sfo>o)trsEq)c>u^¿L'- ll¿

^-LFlYñb ãù

tfo(Jo

J)Lo!cro(J

q-oò:f!OJL

-c(JLroCJUIG)L

F-l

a)()ÐoctnU)ro(J

OJL

ñErgfovcio1)

rgEc.)

nç-{

U)'..u€-cXc)

CI'-+)]=:qJiC'))L)c.)

OV)

!c1¡g:

.,lJU)

c)touocc

lrotØ:¡J

ib-cXOfuLp

]NlFl]O.r\

=CJ

CJL

fu.E.a)

3(ucp(JQ,)

c.)U)

acfg

3Q,)'tCJL

qU)J

00Y{

Oc\q)

.cÐ=otnc)'E

J)Cq)ô

olN)¿v!lø(JP(J_ouECXfs c)

tn

^* *9+-o-.clqaJ=L<-=1LD\o5t-.l .a)(.r}>EEE .r

õnulv>.J u)

E= EguìE6Ë IØ'= -LicÌr Ln

.oOøEaEtgäEE9øEroL= (J(u>-aJ

- g.¿

À.ro tñ9-:,ProQ')cJt*taüÙPOoQU(Jct-cro ru ro

-rIcO-r rrÈ-c o,rts -:5:ß-tu-: -clUcOJUOJ

b.9 qlu >.fU C-(]-ooc=vtcoEc.=o-(J ñ 1J tlt.= (/) ñiCI 0) ì:o{ulJ!'lu= ø!l(.)ODUlvPpø9pr;.9È b.3 Ë ã: EoLn0JX=-aËõPSEirYË¿;8dHa'õg:Ï;¡o-loii_li-vØ-4lllr¡

-LL^Il,ìyoOro.yFrs!9 rãfiF-ËbAE'Eõ59rufqvpÈ8=põrOF-CXeOR P: Ë X:; E * E Ëi_c gë _*.I pr

q Þ'e È 3 È

e aåËE sãEÈÊbE-."5õ=ÜcTr=- O- = .i

-0).L(rcËe-Y!:á!! o-È c o*CTUOOO_XrocuuØ'È

rof1¿

EEËstgØL-!õc'p-lUruËo)CCC1)J!

-- 3r-{ >.JEgEJÐc(,h.9ll .^tu (,¿.u.c

=Ëv'o-o\FC:= (ofOucl-LU^.YU9e.\ LItt ñt!¡gc98*cJ

.Lou)oO]JE-9UC

(oc.)o-o_ro

àoJ):fL)oECJ1).cCJL

ruEforgVcio

lJ:ro(J

!Cro

foEO

Oqlf)$

ffo

oL)z.Pr-r 6-¡--9;+-

L r--{ruocJ o-vÊpE(u_ o_>Y o-bõ'u+J- >-3frbo¿íEL oõ9ìroõ.s àbL Oilô!L(Ë ='-=

EE.YE roIt i3 rJTJêC(L-'= QJ¡= aJ trdl uü ro=

-JJOJc:CJr! (,s9 Ef- .(Ucô c-9oËroPEZ.: Y..fu> tôaa oè- 'r põ ñ-Èu n:ú."ro<;ìF -r ,--laJU*-

cJrgN 'L->p(oçõ"9^>.s_o-i--Efo Q)'= lj+)-oPL.-roÐa-*^ru-()!o-co- fufo uD-pl-ô

.gËfX(J(uo_-=roci 'E¿)p.E3d- .4.)(J>c q.)

oJL

þecru8.9_(JEq+/!Q) r¡äEc.¡ trL.Ëa

¡¿3-18-,C}UOJ-J)CõfYrsr(n o_

co

0)(JcQ.)L

co(J

o-loc

c

cfg

OLroo_c)Lo_

L

{+ {+OOc{,Ncid

OLO

ñNOl

@

Or-l-l-

OqOLO<-

-{+

OOñ

Oql-r)\oN

O<-c'')

OLO

oi\o

OOrr;cott)

OqOLOc'1Fl

{+O.lO'

ooriO(\rôÕNO

{+ {+ {â{+ {+

Oroñ(o

O'roñNOl

{+Or-{+

OIJìr-l

OO\O t-{ñci

OO\o

00r-lONc"')Fi

NO

co cor-{ F{OOc.l N'-l OìÕÕc\ r\OO

ooi-{

Oc\olr\F{

O

coF{

ONFlcÕ

r--{O

coi-{

Or!Orvlr-lO

oo cor-l r+OON(\\o oof\ c{r-l F{OO

co.cor--{ r-lOON(\t$e\ r\*\ -\F{ Fi

OO

oor-lOa\cÐf\ïlO

ooriONtr)a\r-lO

co

=UFvL-<vo- ;=

co

=(Jco

=Uco

=Um

=<(J o-

co co

==U(Jco

U


fU'E¿J

]JCJ1¿ro!o_f-c¿)

=Q).prE

JJv)EoL\t-ôUAJN

IUcro

qq)

EfoanqJL

Ero0iarJ C\o-jLLv9ø>p-_oF '_-õ-9Èó)

Oulc{$N

Oc'lc'-)

ooFlOc\Oìc)(\O

m

=U

voOE c-rË :ojo9Li^

=3 Þ =-onÏñv

c,tì5.P Ø

E Pc., 'q

Ë.ãE bLi qJo -o-LOcOJØ=õ

EHF q'lg Ø\ .Ë,!.-UØ E n, t.tn

!-o Ü .1:.SJ ro c -ocJ '=.àpp :ÞRÞ^#Èa õ-1 '=)-ro õ ì---oorøho.¡91€PËEELJ o-# - o-:*e ti Ë iroP àX.Nk.Eõ*,4

-Lr¡ Ø Q) õt='Ø ru 9 tr->-'õ: ;] :rtr!FV=IU

F E : HIg1õ:Bar'jç=Ou)ãFsE=€XË.g9ã õìÈ g I

i

o,tr?NO\o

{+O\c{

ooi{

O(\co

(\O

cû

=()

Ø

b-e6

ulUFL L NTo) aJì=çaEba E

EËEØ9ruoY.l c."9!.lJ r (uE ^Vq1Yt øôçË-;i oJ .€ËEB(tu:s-,63-cL-^o ''\oE &;a\ -a-- -ÈroõLL-,ruEsa*c.Þp-g92ì-õ.oBô_>;9€¿ .- c-^f)_.Lõ-1 cn

trL

ñFiõvYL,^to-Ëa.roFEäEO)O_QJrUfU

,.P AJô(,E'=>'-ì+LË

Ë õ 3 --; ! n<u - ='= c c r:cn_..ruõ!oruLig;E:E õ€

ËBç;EE õËEËë äs e ä3Eesgö!Ë Þ:ãc*;Ëãå ËääE s b-: ôì F s E_ l,-ì, (U vLJ ,p Ø O

Ë =

35 e E F =;

ËEË#gE H'EË13co)ro.c.l'-l*c'6c-.f- 0J cJ .^ 'E; -{qdõ-:Põ-: q'>.9Eï e'B,s; F gE

e ä Þ il;T Ë Ë Oio .- o -t Õ E o) Ø \LE q','ñ : g È.9 :õ;E È È: H E Ei E Ir o õ j ã.sËü E s,Fp Ëcaã; -E È 3È ã s t¡ÈãH EËg õ õ d

Otr)ñft\r

{+OOcn r__{

ññ

ooF{

ONftOc\O

mco==U(J

coç+ONtr)ONO

Fl

(t,f¿)fupU)¿)Ec.)

Eo.))OJØOJL(tEfuCJ+)

LUJ!CfU

oIIo

oJ)

fuE(Ð

!-l*-)L(.)

ocLf1)(9

OOc;rOcr)

{+OqFl

ooFlO(\NONO

cô

=(J

ãbÈ trË"'

-ìÈ e3-;u1 vpf 'Ë (u

Pô.JJlo -ø)ü_gt! a.¡ q)LLc) ro ^cç ô(Uõ eEE8sH-o 9r

\t-u) fu ru9-E.= (u ruEîro3 R\¿u uôro.9 -Lv!

"o'ËEN -,s 0EcJvhø;ll! roo?\¿ p ,-rC\ici9,¡ÈcJtraJ=o o_õÈ ooç ãEb g=o'<!:gEËE#OJ ru:=

c!(tCJ

.E!rUo!(oL

¡JI

LroOJcCtì.Ccoo_p(noo_

O4Nc\t

{+OqFI

cor-{Oc{rlOa{O

mè(J

AJL

cÐ

2roECJ

qr{

(nl-___o-cXCJ

CI'tr]-)ECJ

JJroEo_fqJLroo_(ÐLo_!cfuU)l-_€-cXQJ

lJc'õ

=Oc.)L

r-{

(n,p_o

=Xa.)p_L

loì,¡,-(fc(g

AJIpoctnU)ro(J

a.)L

rU

EilUto\Z

ôìE;oL(LEctg

lo'j1)

ic\v(h

ruECJ

L0.)!Loo).=:l!q)-c(JUI

\oFl

a.)

JL

E(uEca.)

Efu

3o.)

CJL

OLO

o;\o

Jû

Or-lci

coÌ{ONc'-)r\c\O

o_

U)CJfØ

,t1)

ro'-+iq)L

-\l(Jrgco

Uc.€Bc)UcQJL

ecoL)

!fNJ(n

ú.o1)!cr(]

EoL(¡-ØrU(J

OJco-co_q)o

¿J

Oq00NN

{+Ov:O

@i{ON01Fl

NO

a_

J-Jc0.)

ECJ

ÞCJ(tco

o

=ôq)

.gEloQJ-o-ocfuAJ¿)ro!roL1)

BCJco.)LL

=CJtOJL

Otr?

Ot\o

{âOF{

d

ooF{

Oc{<.Ì-lt"\O

o-


O4OtcoFIñ\f

(pU)o(J

.lJcroU)c.)CJ(¡-!CJ

JF)foEo_f

{-Ju)o:fuq)L

Ecrulnc)OJtr-Lo(Lco'poE

=c)

OJL

OLO

+r--l

{#OOF{ ol

-(o (\

¿)coEQ)

J)q)U\

!oEcAJ

Elo

q-oCI

oLo_o_ru

àrU

.CE:c)Lo-Lo(¡-co

'1=oEU)

-+)cfoEceCJ-o

3QJ

c)L

{+OOCJ

{-rUL!I c.,It-)¿ -(JXrUócoØ

c)U;cØb9.F O_

:=Ero q)-

(l)co(l)Èar9LãtJ)-P!l--

PõLLDF(I)õ s''u3G)'n-c'- .9.CIü.E rotraJ.0Ëur tijasEEõ-Lõ3ECJL(L

9o(Lp(n vtfU OJtrüõar

(L(¡-'F.cfUo--cp'=>^¡J Lô(Jr-lo.¡J loCeoç(J IU

Eeropo6.9E:ci roEE0J c.)Ø!cicLtg

5.9¡JCtr c.rot_c 0Jl-- g(9EÞb,EEìcl c)L!rofiou)-c)al u){_)'>.,9'ro ;lf '--r(l,)J

vtptJ,to(JLc.),pOJ

-cU)

roQJ(Jcq)aQJ

lJqo(J

EtoOJL

JtU)cruL

q)fc,Ðco(J

U)colnlttf

]CJl.Lo1E

¿Jcq.)

EOJ

t.ÞiQ)t(h

IlJlhoo-

'Q).L

:.-'-cUJrU

fo_oov

i

ìC)ctla:l

oipìL,AJD]JOJ

3,O

:OJL

oo¿)

fU

EO

ry

LUJ\JCtuoLL]o;EoÐ8põgõec -1 c.¡(Jv(-(-):p(tCe

=OõiõE*,ä3 6\rÞcoc)f--Ø@C(r- {ìrooõEot¡rE,f9-fifõtb',tr9YE(JAJËè,ìE.g\oõ ìr-V Y

o)o -LP-C;r_^ULfqÈ Èg.- a E t.

^(J-J'c.l O- õ O. ñ) u-È Q pJ)P-

b e ñgh; E -s¡ ro ØE+?c'=uH. Ë:=cC.)='il (È .\ luF€ g >-,YAcqìPÈ 9.9I = ^,P Ets0JNci;rO);Xr.^(l.,¡väi-o9EL^l-P

:= + '= llf dlE t;.E õ pc.¡ r¡l^õ-O C-J L T-l L

- ; a -,eE.9 bE Þ.P'Jfn)v

E F cËËïõc.¡o,9Sr=ØC-(ncþãle- "' L t-al

,Q g "i¿Dv-r-Jqù ÞB-oã8EeELLLñL rú Oì). L)(E

-._- sLL,oiäiEo

)l rr ! O-2-

O'qL/l

s{+

.^(JãjLncôfiJru -O tnf irË 5i

=CJ'p<.-cro-lo::ct(Jl9 t¡lou!'-L-lJ (, q- .=3*a.9E I E:-O^'-{I 'i= rY =,r'¿õ__ro o'ã rú0J oË ø)'u6_¡ÈO-r-O (U o-

! p+8.P õ-:.'õÈxboVÈ trb.b!ç CY,E-o-.LQJO'r=9Ø:=b.eË iE IG)õØbA-w I or^ L - ln':ocg)-ì o -P-P-

Þä5!3 t-,f II Sl' ctrõË (, E(UJ

- fU-taJu9Ê:JI-LL

E"eEs

o.¡J

U)+)ç.q)

EfUo!{ocoE!!fU

_c.P_

=p.9

fo.E.¡J

a)¿)rU

{JoccroEcruU):lJs_cXq)¿)c'õ

3()c.)L

i-lt-

U):P_!-cXqJ

CI'C¿F)

gìcELrUglOJL

copfU

fo_pu'tpc'õgl.c-c(JfuÐJ)rU(o

EfUfovcioÐrU

E()

cov)f

fU

OqOì01Fl

{â

O]OLO ,rO

ñoi ¡

cÐ \oc,î

l

:

{+ {+ì{+

OqLNc'1Fl

J&

oor-lOc{00oaÐO

0o,oo.coF{ i-l r-lOOONNN<- \o or#OONcf)rÐOOO

ooì--'{ONc'lrlC\O

OIO

ooï-lO(\OlOc{O

Or-{ñ

OLN

ñr\t

{#

OulF-{

OryO

ON=f

Or-{ci O

co coFl ?-{

O:Oc\ r\c'.) 1..(\ a\¡cr-l o-lOO

cor-lONN

(\O

t_<vo-=cn

=(JcoBU

co

=Uco

=<<(J o- o-


FEES INCURRED RELATING TO SETTLEMENT.

PRORATED 50% STATE LITIGATION; 50% FEDERAL LITIGATION

STATE SUMMARY

CWB STATE

KELO STATE

KMK STATE

PA STATE

FEDERAL SUMMARY

CWB FEDERAL

KELO FEDERAL

KMK FEDERAL

PA FEDERAL

Prorated Hours

21..7

0.45

1.05

1.15

Rate Total

S25o.oo 5s,425.00

s3oo.oo $13s.oo

S18s.oo 5re4.2sSTso.oo S862.so

P ro ratio n

so%

so%

so%

s0%

Total

Proration

s0%

so%

50%

50%

24.35

Prorated Hours

21..7

0.45

1.05

1.15

$6,616.75

Rate Total

S22s.oo $4,882.s0

S3oo.oo $13s.oo

Sr.8s.oo 51.94.2s

S6es.oo 5799,2s

Total 24.35

48.7 Total hours for combined State and Federal

s6,011".00

EXHIBIT D


F-Zonf4.lOelor<(oo)¿coF-{ <¡' in'

l,88<oln^i rn Oì* t-- (o

(rL.)Ln0l ç-l ç-lJFIFIo

\O \Oo\ o\OOLN LN

ô?c{

JL<tirõÉÊ(JLnu

o-

hJo-.J',

J

FFcofrn

åt¿luk3É4O r--0dotuþ-

c.9PCLL(Jt^oô

.g-cU(ULCJcCJb¡

oco(õ

Ev3ro

CJc_co_qJ

CJP

F-l

-,boCJPñLP

-oclo

flI)

OJ

-:z(o

co

UEoçEc(o

oP

2(o

EG)

c.l

.=-c(JxU-cE3qJ

cOJ

Fco(J

c'tõ('occrU

Eoç3(o

ECJ

äo'õoJ c!t^ --)

.gt()oJ(l,)cüã- o.r

9JE-cJOJP Lõo-Ovo-=:JOor=

_yØe=rgo-co=ÜØooJPb¡

=r -oC:l¡g -oEEoçoøl'ro:c_c(UF

!ñcCJ

-ì\-l-i-co'ØCJ

EqJo-

Eqts€loLq_1;'cr

(õ rJ)

ar3Ët^-o;

U)(Uoa-

äo

¡- rEarã(9cr

. L) -¡¿

eËECocñ(Jcoo_

FCØ(Þ'õEõÈ

PcAJ

EOJ

TPOJ

OJ

çoL

OJ

(ooqJ

v)qJ

o_oL'-.g.gECJ(,to!cro

EL

3(g

EOJ

oL

=(õPcOJ

EOJ

PPc)

coqJUcqJ

CJçco

qJ

o-o'-.g.cEOJ(,toPõc(o

Eoç3(U

EqJ

LCJ

ocCJ

EqJ

PAJØCJ

'-,rE

.cEqJ(9

toP-Õcrú

EoLç3lõECJ

PcCJ

EqJ

PPqJ

çoØJP(g

OJ

'-.ro.EEOJ(9

t_cvI:(ú(Joco

_co_qJ

OJ

AJ

coOJL-ocro

rg

oo_

Lo_PcCJ

ECJ

P(Uq

CJL

ñEro

rcVciEcto

-Y:fN

=rnÉ.oP

CJPPOJ

ìqJ';CJ

o.)L

-:¿:lNl

r./)

¿ço

I

OJPPOJ

=.0J

OJ

cOJ

Eo

OJØ

of(o

Ø(u

-v.(J(!co

(JØ

>ÈCJPccJ9ECJ AJ;p

ocJUØ

PcOJ

EOJ

FPOJ

ço

EAJ

AJL

(o

E(o(UY.

ciEoþLCJ

CJ

=CJ'=CJL

Iõ;torC,E.i-' b¡cucJfc0JOJLP LPqJ .YqCçLooøE=Ft!(,Øto(uCL(olu -vtr(Jõ(oìi cô_(J(tc^;=.:6U FÈooL Ø

sCCJ AJPCP LOJçqJoL(J

-:¿ qJOL(õccoo

.PLJIooP_C-oFco(9çoo_L AFC9ro'õEtroõÈ

¿,ic(o-c(JCJb¡-OØ

f-CØ=.q

OJb! -çCP

cJ-CJtsÊõEPoiç-:¿ u=qJ-JE'g or>-c>'Pv)cOPL -+õØ.=AJU

ÞB0Jo-v. -v.()O(E(Uco co

(JÜooPPE-Occ(o(gEEooL Lçs22(o(uEEoJ 0.)

qJ5o

'4O)(o4coOc\

O)cOri

o)cor-l

OìcOc-l

Lrlo)(O

|.r]or(O

4ooOc!

4or(o

O)cOJ

rtìO)(o

OìcOç-i

OìcOr-l

t^LJoE

ïlÄ

ô?O

c.lO

Nd

c\ ri rld

ca)

Uç-l c.l

Ot-l

-iõJ

-;(\ci

c.9vt!(,oa

Or-.)

I

OLô

EEP\n

Or-rt

I

OLn

EPPlrl

OLn

IoLnPETr./)

OLô

OLn

EEtî\

OLô

OLa)

EPPtn

oLN

I

Ot.r)PEPt /'l

OLn

I

Or.r)PEPr./)

OLa)

I

Or-.)PEP\!'t

OLn

I

OLNP

EPr,/)

OLn

OLô

EFrn

Ot/)

I

OLn

EP

rn

ar¡OLn

EPPtn

OLN

OLn

EPu1

0)+)too

l-rr-lONO)ç-l

s

l-rr'{Or\Or\I

Þ-ç-lO(\F-lrl

oo

ÞrFlOa\<f,r-lco

t--F-lOc\rnF-l

oo

Þrs-lOa\(os-l

oO

ooJOc!rnçl(\

oorlOc\j(or-l(\

oorlO(\l--c{c\

ooç-lO(\(\a\

cOç-lONF-l

co

cOrlO(\rlco

cOJNc!cô

ocLoPP

o_ o- o_ o_ o_ o_ o- o-


c+:'-(J

oô

0.)L(g(-)LqJP

þCJL

CJ-Vf,-Jo).zP(gPcqJ

CJLo_qJú._cf3ÒocFOJG)çor+N>qJÅ

<c>(oocJ'õÊ3õUP

o)-Oq

OJ

PfqJXCJ

(uboclo

_c

CJ

=oI-oc(!qJ

-lzfJCJ

P(E

cOJ

o.)Lo_oÉ.OJL

c.9

=().9-õ-ÕcCg

ØbJ

cJ -o

AJ

fP(o

.9o¡CJ

J

o_c(oCJL

=

(o

oo-o_(oPAJb¡

!=-ocCJcOJ

P(u

CJ

ñ(J

LCJP

oçco

o3AJ

=cL^6001-,¡ =-

'= 0J

(u-oãH9cm,i-rop9.õØc¡u^o¡=(uHor:Ef,LCcJqOOJ;; OJç^PVtcJY(U'=PLØ¿^ß

le Y¡\^^=r-l ç "i -OvLv-

PIUPcJ=(UÞ¡j Þ¡ 0JE--õC)^J-!:a5P- YcJoo):.=>croEooL(jr:1 C)ñru!+E QJ i¡=cxLbr o aJi;,Igts.lOrU(^fo-õ9>cJiõ^

.- p ^:" a- ø CrJ

O-O CJ-O-PLØõc-P > -9oäõ-=Ê,Yro^ã'. - a-$

:ì to (U g -).q v b4 nl Ø

rr¡-C qJ È .tJor=-9¡Ã;,=.9.IJÈYØØOCJñoçcr;b. E E trEg3äÚ'.;Lô-o--rCi

qJ

LoPIEØ

'boCJ

oP_c(oCJL

f,oEc(U

o¡o

(U(JPcAJLtoo-LOJPØo+c)

c(oo

-slfu -.,b¡..AJE^cJPts=CJ(UFçPL(UCJØ

OJo¡Ef-oOJPlou)-c()

OJ

GJ

-ocroñì --,CJP'-cí,9LL-- oJNF

-cJ.]b¡GJc

Pc-fõçcOLpcJ boP.=C,, PØ(ÞqJ qJLL

(ofEõ(oO-

(oLcocçoØ^PucJ-c oJ

'=Ø> -v,

-g(Js

c.9

=(_)

ELO-o co(o ø)

^oJrt .Þ.jË-ePCccJqJP-(qoJ b¡P LerP

õ9oo=cJ!YL

ØcJ cJ6U,9:-ooc -:¿ffo

çP

.9.9oõEoJø>PPc(o0JIrõcJ o-(ú cJ

PCØooË-c3ì

-õccoç6ocJ-oØLCCØ=o!Pr9c<u=o>xqJ .o qJ

-LP

E =*,P..lJ-s35o;iþ+'if4PY--PPar<=0-)L-o€

=PøflaJ-o;(u C.;-cf.^Ø ç ---ìv-N_ Lõ.sg>P_¿ß-P O¡'ãCJ '- -bO .= rlEctra;ãtõ--->vç.¡ äG-Y-:.¡ro9-o-3bxEi e b¡:(J-o9ro!õco*(q9!Qõ

t.=N-oE:\.-u:>(J-(ooaji:ELXoJ(oQ-L!Ø

oP^VN(/)'=F -- 9AJOio

äqB--r õ aJ

ÑLÕr.dr

tr;ÚbeYFçõõ--2P:>uõ9;oOOfTËä: Þoog.= dtô-OLùro---. b¡ rõYqJs

LP

.9pczØG):cJ-Fre0J

-O)P!LP

Þ.egsECJ\OJLL-CO

-ULM:LCJ;a- i,ô

ofo:äolr

oJti=oo!1rÈgØ

P € -e-à

CJ

jr>ßOp> Ln'A

ìõ:vçõ

z6>ni O'(D'= 23 5 u-.r(O-:I -ØL6IP

(oc>q

-ôlõõõ;(JgsñãcJCPF o c^õØqco

Èv

Ø:qJcJoJcP.='=oØõáPcJ+-vLP

-.=uc,)u I )ôL)-õ nP õ

-CleØ=o--o.F'CJ --ç CJ

=cooJqpv-:J/-ó=-6chõuIUY:>Lq t o oJ

= 0r 2ãËts-€b9de

OCJL-P Lro;o

ØÌgLtnYOJcJ:fgP>OØq:-À

Yùd-o

Ø

=oI

ô?Fl

nõl

oqO

Lrl

NnO

o) \sf

oq(\

qs-l

clîJ

c.9P(oUoa

OLÔ

I

OLnPE

r./)

LôI

C)Lô

P

EPP\h

OLn

OLnPEPPrn

oLn

IoLnP

EPP\h

Ol.r)

OLnPE

tn

OLô

I

OLnPEP\n

OLn

I

OLô

EP

\n

OLn

I

OLNPEPPtt)

OLô

I

OLN

EP

r./)

C)Lô

I

Orl)

EÐP\n

OJ

(oâ

l--\-lO(\rn<.

|'rr-lO(\sr-l<f,

f'rF-{

ON$rlst

It-slOc!Þ-t-l

l--çlONcorl

l--r-lO(\$C\st

l--r_lOc!l-rc{s

I-rr-lOc!Lô

Lo

t-rlO(\Lôç-l

Lô

l-rilONcOç-l

Ln

qJcP

co

=(Jco

=(Jcô

=c)

cô

B(Jco

B(Jco

BU

co

=(Jco

=CJ

co

=CJ

co

=(J


.n

\¿E'=u

coJOØ'Ø q.)

9boJ O3>--o(oP-_.: ØØ=aJ .Y,EP

Ou_c qJ

ãs=¡ 'doccJfõPØSCJP:fL i-ì-$

Ø (,)gäoglUL?,qJo¡ÈOJL

J

.ro cJU!aJ .-og

õì -:¿ogó.qL!

L_

+ LgfocJ-P(o

\ZICJ (u ^Þrcçå'V L

;coõ;.C(ULU^'-ô ¿ó -^ iì:garõ

UJPll .9c0JJ,=oo-oL'ØØØOØÇl +oJË'=\A^Øcäü''lGOP0Jr.{(JØ9"-^,8.ãÈÞËqLL_(O

Ôõ(lJØU

Ë F E€ Y

2[ø:'õo-=-o;=

=E:e3-q q - .- L

õ556'pbo()'r=d.=

iO ^t

U ijF

-o ia õ oCJft'Y_-TJ-õ=frõEOË6L'ôgE.9-cíL!eESs€^rÈfLPO_^(OPõCv)._Ø.o(ogõqrL!-g^

=9É'riËç=(oc(J6U-F: Ø b¡-c =UEortË-

CJNo¡ìCJ .YloØLOJirØ--ãcr 'õ-:. o\è6¡ØqJ b!PC(o '-ú) -gil0bLtsCJõLPêt6c!EElr,roropCO^L.ucJE6q=oJOØ+(o(õ=ro(J=O)FØô^=õ" .Y o_CJ:gL,-=_Ov)È.rso(gPb¡-=c-õ{)or=Õ ágÈ ô-c'5F92Erúãcoä'á9E6P

V,os-õ Eg

fÞ¡CJPfoLP

c.9

qJ

(!'(Joo-

OJ

coPcLocF(,-c.=3:(o

uì0J_lr-õc6oo¡ØLØ:=CJ'=Ød:EEUOJ0JP;íà"ì rYoJ=Øiu€.9b.o Ë --ìe.qIOc-P(¡JØ

!tsõ

:'i t orËo!3PEo¡ c.r fiL.Nõ'-ä9.qtr:-l-=eõtâõ(9.-5

.LÔ'->.-:3-¿j

^LOEOçtotØ

ô-cE'(U(Eì:ço9õo-çFeØP-C=u(õ(oq>çEOJOJãE

ñt ONP>Ø=-o

.- õ ,:J

c!-C)çqlgq

EãgP'-:f30 eP .. OJ

9ô1 oF-Nõ9'b¡oi-aØr¡

õqq

ã -sEo=u)'õ-a:3eg.9Epu'{=ooLr)oa-roEØL=

I g-orofotr õçß¿L^.";P"lV ä .-'l

c; .9=-*_th-'cÈ a.rE I

=gËE33#Ecrs*ooJ-Øb E P.9çfi1'-ñ

5 =È,j(JCJAJ(JcJ '- -õ 0J

s'v =5

oìg o-IULPE_e€ IilïsELü.i (oo_àE+3UP-(oË!?.=;: s frEgcu

üF*Ë'=ÈçoJ

ÉËeç-Lc)(E

rEEf;->PPC>roØo.¡.9üoL>-P¡0J.ìVtõ:sEH^Ltrn<uõ=--:(JPY-eõ! O L -FcJoc.lo-tD * o-E.-=çL Uo c oo.!

LJ-o9l>oA-ä3õ€39EE:3Øqlo.L

ØUñ0JLqJ=CLØtrYLÔ.-LLa.,;g.g':jgro(odJoô L

- L

-'poõø!L

-u^.-L

=csf-oOCõ--:oJu

cOJ

-Ø(!c 6-.¡ cE:.oo*Pu::-õÈ.Øx=

òo-.Lc.Yo,!(O P (lJ

=qL-P6

'õarb'rf, -o Iccylro ro.|3

cco)aJ(uL-OOroc(o:o>,YOo6L(JO qJ Ø^ç -.c Ø c'.¡ñf0J---

JÕ0JLT_L(õ ,- o) =:q':EI.-rÃç.--YA-FÈU:ooTX o-c <.:9F'Ø

PØ(rqrts ^ Pr,:ov)€s5€cuõqJ(O-L

PçCõ6¡QJönl --.1

-UE >sf .F

Ë Qã:0JYØ-i:83OJ CJ OJ CJL L g L

qJL:

'- ç-lc __-.(Ù Ø

EO

öqrP>c-o cJ

EE$qrOPofiPØ

rtr CJLL-o .-}E.qr '->'F(UcLo15(9c(U>

OJrõCJP

6<Øô-qJLt'=oõÈ'E :='Fqct-3 .'->clCPocL 0.)

ØC=CJñEL C_)cJ6

r.tl

coÞto(JItoPOJbo-of

-oEc(o

cqJ

EOJ

EPqJ

(oPcOPoo-OJ

-c(J(oOJL

JoCJf,cPc

qcl

q(\

oqr-l

<:a

qN

oqçl

\(\ r-lñ

n?O

4O

OLn

I

OLnP

E

\n

OLô

I

OLN

E

tn

Orn

I

OLnPEPU)

()Lô

I

OLÔPE

r,/)

Orl)

iOr-.)PEpPttl

LÔI

LôPETr./)

OLn

IoLôPE

r./)

OLñ

I

OLôPEPPrn

OLn

OLN

EPP\n

O

OLô

EFPrn

Ì--r-lO(\t.Ft

(o

l'rrlO(\l-.co

|-\rlO(\¡O)

co

t-i{O(\Oç-l

oo

Itrr-lo(\sf,F-{

It-ç-lOC\(orlco

l--r-iO(\l--F-l

oo

t--r-lONT-lc!oo

l--r-lOc\LÕ

c!r-l

l'rç-lC)r\co-iNFl

co

BLJ

co

=(Jco

=(Jco

=CJ

co

=(Jco

=Uco

=(Jco

=UêO

=(Jcô

=c.)


OOq4J Ln c\t<NCOt:sfcob,rì+F i/| vt

OOqqO lf,

uJtôN!a{a{k .¡r *¡rÉ.

ì\çl ç-1C\ (\

nms

r,/)ú.loT

F=ô_tn

JL<'*uú=FL!:<ôUFL!(J (n rr

J

FoFcol\h

\O \O

OOLN LN

cqJ

EOJ

P9go:-.=p>õ=ü6qJ -cL.P

E3(oØcJf'orgEb¡ qJo_ø-cg).:<3-o(o(o(J

-P;^- G)bo

-roEfc-o$_ø(oo

ä9sTÞ¡-,ùool '¡fLIOõPoOetroc

CJL

4'c,rú.cçCJ(9

t_c!

=:(oQ

-:ì(a?

-:¿(Jo(Jc(Þ

-rño-co

3ã-p(oCU(uo1 õ-pcq9vccJLPo(!

;s (-/)

io_u.tc>o-d:Ø(o(UU L

PcAJcOJ

PPAJØCJ

coPcoLnFp.c(9qJOEPOJ

.-Ptcr P-CJCØoJ cJ

iìLïlØ.-, Er^ñcqJOP,PO(o LL

o=oÞPfU

OJ LLJ

-JFAJÈE'=CJØ=cr fIco -:ì- F.lcrg-(tt-:Zõ

Uõo'ÐPO:0OñcJ(.) c

ioctgoP

1rõe'ro

.gEØcJoPt-aì !

:0J

(ooJo0JQ- ú)sr>o-tcJ -:ìPU.ìc;J-

UeebFP

)f,ocJ()

EEØEE AJÑGJP

.YbJLth qJ

L! CJ (LJLO

:lJJ qJLJP(o-C^YJù:oo''(J<Oe¿.tLco c.)È>Eì-o

LP(ÞY0J(JFq

AJ

.Nñc

iF

--...J

OJ

oCJPcfo()cCJ

EqJ

PP(UØí;E --:Ø 0.J

-loro=qJó

O'()tI_

(li P

--9LlJCJ

c lt-L-o9.È cJ

!þñOO(JPP

..o qJ

ØC;= CJ(oE

c)Ø

Ø-ñP

cOJ

ECJPPCJ

CJ

coPcLo-cF(,Eo

F

ñ3roEqJ

(o

E

-ãC\Zo

çC

co(ooOL:,9ç-l rO

:CJ(o .91tro(U,- -:ìã ,rl

¡¡CiFo

PË-ajÏlc=oo= botr/,9õUPlccJPÈc,: 6-Ju=o!-iJ+ÞhrOsx>oo-oqJf,(ocouiPü-6dJ--(lJL.:

T;3õ-tt\c-

03."->o-ìE>l

coEAJP

PPcqJOJØ-LC^qrùpcJ

9eF\-crlLofoNO_-aroõ:c-a0JCJPPAJñØCçqio

E3roocr 90

OY-c(U_oo:(u-oc6.sö¡PEÑ)c-OLqJ€N)x .=

-=Lrtl

=F(eØ9¡PL

Ë or]=-ç(o6fìã'=Yo¡ã r Þ.0 0.JË(õc

cOJ

EqJ

PqJ

CJ

CJP(õ

VIoOJ

coo_

I

OJP

OJ ô?

OJ

=cïo occJ(EL

L,Y or

=0JOJcØ9't.È9

-o

o q.l

oì"^ .aJrn (Ll-lOvg

6oJ

CJ(J

þcto

LlJJ

EoL

Ec(o

o

g(o -_-E,uOJE.:ì (o

'-1 ro

-\ZL.cJ /^\

:oYPqJ=PloC(Jf .-

8ñ9;or2Ø=Y6ä'ECJrL L.r oJ

0J iJ

oJ aJ-.Putõ(oUôv) 0J

ì:OJù'toE>

qO

ç-l.j I

Oìç-l

oqO

F-l r-l.j

oqO

-i-ì

no

Ot/)

I

OLô

P

EP(n

Otr)OLn

E

tn

OLÔ

OLa)

ETP(n

Or-rt

I

OLnPEFP(n

Or..)

OLÕ

EEPrn

Or-r)

OLN

EPPrn

Ol.r)

I

OLÔ

F

ËFP\n

oLn

I

OLNP

EPPt^

OLn

I

OLn

EP\n

LnIo

Lô

P

E

tnoor-lOC\¡-r{ç-l

ooç-{ONLnr-lc\

ooF-lC)Nç-lr\¡N

ooFlON(\NN

oor-lONcOc!N

oor-lOr\(\(\

ooFiON

(\N

oor-iOc!O(\c!

ç-lO(\l-ra{(\

oor-lO(\cO(\N

oÕ

BCJ

co

BU

cô

BU

co

=(Jco

=(Jco

ÈU

co

B(JcÕ

=(Jco

=CJ

co

=U


OOqqLn rnco cf)r-t F-l4J't 1J>

OOqqOOOOco co{-n- {.r}

rn LnnnØOOÉ.lo-

\o \oOOLN LN

LLJ

Fú.

qO

LJô-\n

J

FoFcolr./)

JL<'*uÉ.ï + u..r:<ôLJ T- LU(J Ln ul

JLU\Z

oJLrl:Z

l-

coPCLLutiqJ

ô

OJU(/)Pd,äri;ianô'õ ü'F bo? o¡.=ÚgEEË.:roe6O-CZ<u

-cc0JU(JI(U:Ê:sjEEo)^^PC_Crb¡li ä-o o.È C c

ñUL<-:

E t Ë i- =

-6.¿t;õao.=qAc**'õn,*(J:ç'=g)ú;

s,EþË9tsro õ CJ .- e

= 5.= t .= F-l .---: ELL aJ :: __, .-': U o-c .- Ïl e - -c 9ì

Ë3å"qäË ÞPSi 3-ç 3ö!ñ

--:bJ co Y oor I ooUIÑ.=OU=ç- cJPar='-.:Jár-^!

=ô0JqJ;çrJL FT^i*-bJ.--*.1-i O¡ r-l 9J qJ *: _c

u--..:9: ooã P-V

=c¡s'-:lô(1ro',=..-ïJ=L9;'uu..qÞ,rPBlq

è-uv

ó E qo= I -c õ -Èor.sìõ.=*'y4:rolX5=o9jç P ÉqpJ.EaøË99Èn.9ugreeü3ue';,Y=aJFo-cõgorU*;=9

; (J .- - - ôsL¡=ú-J=É(':3ç3;=eE59Yf?gþ.!-:¿o ä9 Ç'- I F ç,Yc¿iI(Jü.íco

GJ

E(ÞIA

AJ

bocrúEU_ioPOJ

co_r^CJL

b¡cc)CJ

Eb¡.=.=(JoEo

(o(JoU

oOJ

-:¿fJ,nciAJú.c)

boc(o

_c(JjEo

I

ro

ECJ

qJ

co_qqJ

-ocroLOJ

-c_c.!

=ooc,PqJqJ

Ebo.=.=õCJ:oOJJf

-Jo.zP(o

cQJ

CJLo-OJÉ.OJg

-)¿ 0J(JØrúC

o-u3-.c LP-Y\U5roo-õ=¿(JoL:oY

qJ

J

ã

Oc-](\

OcO

OcO

tiLJo

J-

\O

F-l il

o

e

.9vto

oa

OLÔ

I

OLô

P

ËEP\n

OLN

I

OLn

EEPVI

OLn

Or-r)PEP

v)

(¡)Pt0A

It-r-lOa\¡

Lô

<f,

l--F-lON(o\t

t--.F-lO(\Þr

$

oÊLoPP

oJLJJV

o-Jl¿J\Z

oJLUV.


F-Zønf c1 .-'J

O=t"t<oro)¿..1 ¿{ r¡¡ <¡l'

OOqqLô LNoo coç{ r-l

(ô LN LÔO¿OOJ.IJoE

\O \O

OOLN LN

:¿

V

v:Z

4J#

n(\¡

l-Jo(tt

J

t--oFcoltn

L<'æ. ItL æ-FuoËil(JLnu

c.9vCLLIt^(¡)

o

c.9Øc)

E(JAJo_

oP.c(u

(U(,)

(u

IAoçoCJfØ.2OJ-cPPOJþoo

ðe-oZç: -.:¿ño(g-ìE(o=-ELcJo9ç U

L

OJ

=cJPqJP

P!(õ>

bo rY(I)õf,')ì õl>(o oJcJ-ØY

cJLL(U

co'õ

E(JqJo-

oP.g.(Jo-oP

toPOJþooCJL

=ECJ(Joo_-c.Q!(ooAJL

0,Jr

O14

O<fr\

OqcosfFi

v)L)o=

(a?

rloq

O

c.9pt!(Joa

Or..)

OLn

EFrn

Orn

I

OLn

E7P(n

CJÐt!ô

l--çlO(\Olçi

r--ç-lo(\Oc!

(¡):oo(Jpp

V

>Z

:Z

:Z


FEES INCURRED RELATING TO CLASS MEMBERS. INQUIRIES

PRORATED 90% STATE LITIGATION; 10% FEDERAL LITIGATION

78.7 Total combined State and Federal Hours

STATE SUMMARY Proration Prorated Hours Rate Total

AMDE STATE 90% 30.15 S 12s.oo 53,768.isCWB STATE 90% 40.68 s2so.o0 $i.o,i"70.oo

TOTAL 70.83 513,938.75

FEDERAL SUMMARY Proration Prorated Hours Rate Total

AMDE FED 1,O% 3.3s $ 12s.oo 54tB.isCWB FED ro% 4.52 522s.oo $i-,017.00

TOTAL 7.87 S1,435.75

EXHIBIT E


co'FCLLItô)o

,¡)co

cOJ

EoP

CJ

soqJ(JPocc,FLJ(o

ñ(JOJ

!to(J

coNØqJ

:=fu.gLOJ

_oEqJ

Ev)

GJ

EoEgoo_qG.)

nco

OJ

PocPcG)

EOJ

FPCJ

c.9PU(ú

(úõCJ

co(\ØqJ

:=fõ.gLOJ

_oEQJ

E

túEoEcoo_Øc)L

q.)

.9Ø>õouo_3ó8EE*íÑ.fEõccuõVLL

o-¡ '- \(J-:ìu-Lnão--:s

ØP-\cc$occcJcJroSqcô-vl\ñctrØoõ:f!E-oõØF

aqyULØU-õ

Çn ç.ÛL.cJtrØ'=Yroã-F U

LLlo

larEãt.u aJ'!P9ÔSÈt(EØ6CECJØoc'C(ÚñrU'=oftcro><p

=õ AJË

Ul!

qY<qJ9Ë¡uE

ì.3

fil

AJ(J'Eocc(U^

CJçCJ

OJ qJ

ooJ'-põroõõro ì:õ!!OJ

(U

<trØ-o0Js'-o

.-Fz>

.gõg5

I :epç0JcJ -otrcû2

-l!

=(!-cl =0Je

?'Øõ.CJ>=EOõcJ=oOØPbO

-'-=õco-(uØbOcJ q)

ç-lr-lPcqJ

ECJPPqJ

qJ

CJL'-o.EPcoroo-LqJP

U

CJ

coØG)L

o_

=B

=o+

PEoEOJ

OJØqJ

f,ct.=L(u

_oEqJ

E

IU¡oõcoa_qCJ

U

qJo_P

C)

EUqJO.

b¡.=c(¡.)

Oc

:ql

:.=PcCJçqJ

PPAJØc.)

(U

:==oc=cO! r-lqJ-(J^ccJro F::äEØ:0Jc>o.=(o'ão=- ,99

o=^to.YØc c..)OCô L

aiõYÔ

-oclUPcAJ

ECJ

PPCJ

CJ

ØPcOJL(Uo_

OJ

oççoLçAJ

:r=o

.E(oco

"--E-orooP

bo,c-oco_

o

O)

IfI cr-u=O>co8U-

ri-i(O

OJ

.Q

ocEc(oPcOJ

EAJ

PAJ

CJL

qJ

'-d.c(gc.9.tEE(oPcqJLtoo-qJP

ooPUI(Uqcoo-(U

o_

=3oõç

L

c.)(),P

oc

AJL

o(J

.=-ocro

vìOJ

.9Poc

(o(J-

d

Èri9ØgJu(oPPpV)cJ-ØcqJo

^c(o>vtoØO-.9 bo.: .cJ5OLC(o

Þof,9Ou)L-(o=o- ,eL;1CJ;Øb¡o';çcJo-oEU-CJõLo-oØ(JoJ-L.=

(J

E(,)qJo-

-oc(o

a.ì

FocØruõcoçAJPPOJ(n

bo.=E(õboCJ

ØCJ

:==o.=PcOJ

(õo-

OJPØoþa-=BÔ r-l::N

ocoP.J-õØoho_ynõY-o

!cñCJb!Ef,

_oìoc(oV)5(oP

PcAJçOJ

PP(IJØqJL

cOJ

(oo-õ0J ¡:PØEJoc+(ULn tn

ÈoJUYO

1¿ro-(oE() .<-P(oloCV,.9 'bô.= qJ

Eç!oluo=P.Y:o irOro

ur

6-

CJ00-o=-oo

fUOJXoOJ

PcCJ

(tro_L(u^üqO r-rç-icr

Þ¡

,Y -oõ0J(J>

:LPPJOUccJ

><

Ecr,2ECu)CP(UCôE-: lõ<]. o-

-:¿ L

b.9-

quo>ç6o=EPoì:È(o(E.goEP

O(oU(J

IE3Ø>c<O(J{=7rs .E.9-=õ!(oLJÕ)CL

PEf,õqClqJOJ(oõ*cJgpoØü.P€gaØ

cOro qJ

OJÔ

5<O- croy-nr -õ

Eõru9cb¡=(oì-9-õqUt,1) oJ

ç*f,O

Sp^Cco qJ

-c(oFLdiCJØ

qqJ

-:losPcqJ

ECJ

P

OJ

OJ

$

ÊE(DçLqJPrh

çEL

I

(ú()o-=3:ço

!coo-AJL

.'lPcOJ

ECJ

FPCJ

AJL

Øo:==o.c-c.!3

#E(oçL0)PV,oc!EoL

!

(E(J

\z-¿Pc0.)Ltoo_LCJPØo

FcoL

(!ECJ

oq

CJ

=(U

cCJ

Eo

OJ

CJ

PcAJLlooLAJ

^(\mc-OC'-o;nèö¡- .F_

lo(U

^õ.Y...¡EgärAJ EJ

Ô!

UvcOJ

too_LOJP

osEoLs(\!ro

E(U

tâL5o:tr

lJ]an

nco

\c\]

nrl

qç-1

4O

ncf)

,a?

-l

ç-{.j

r-lñ

il

ñ ..jqN

ìO

qO

c!O

qç-l

n

otrt!(Joa

EAJ

LLOT-1

CJPõÐrnOO)

!qJ

LLOr-lCJPro

lr,Oo)

-oqJ

LLOçlOJP(oPtno)

-oAJ

LLOF-l

OJPlott)Ool

Eo

LLOr-lCJ

(oPtnOO)

!qJ

LLOr-lc)(oPtnOOl

EAJ

LLOr-lCJ

roÐt/)OOì

!OJt!OF-l

CJProPU1

O)

EqJ

LLOr-lCJP(oPlltOO)

!CJ

LLC)ç-l

c.)ProPrnOo)

EOJ

LLOrlqJPõPrnC)Oì

ECJ

LLOr{o(E

rnOO)

-oOJ

LLOrlqJ

(g(nOo)

:ÕCJ

LLOrlO(g

rnOO)

-õGJ

LLOil

CJProP\nOo)

-oo

LLOF-l

OJP(o

r./)OOì

cqJ

LLOFiCJP(oPt/)Oor

-oCJ

LLOF-l

CJPõr./)OO)

oPfI'o

r-r\-lO(\cO

$

|-..\-lOr\<f

s

l-.s-lONrn

l-.r-lON(o

s

|-..F-lONt.rs

r--r-lONco

$

t--.r-lO(\C)F-l

Þ\ç-l

(\rlç-{

|-..l-lOc\

ç-l

<-

It-rlONf-..r{$

I-rç-lO

ooil

$

It-ç-lON$Ns

Þrç-lOc!ç-l

LN

t-rlOa!cf)

Ln

t-r-lOc\LNc-i

LN

t-T'lOô.1

cor-lrt)

l-rrlOc\c{(\r.l')

t--.F-lO

(\rn

c)cLoPp

cÕ

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=UcÊ

=(-)co

=(Jco

=UcÊ

=(Jco

=()co

B(Jco

BO

cÊ

=Uco

=Uco

=(Jco

BU

co

BU

co

=U


Fzfo

OqOl-rr-l

r-l{/|

Oqf'rs-lO.ì1J\

vtLJoT

co(oosf

(\14<f

P

=CLtt,

\oo\Oo)

o\OFI

pLJo(J

LLJ

FFrn

ôLULL

CJcLoPP

co

=Uco

=(J

o-CJPØ

XCJcEcfgOJ

=ro

Pcq.,

ECJ

FCJ

QJL

.qJ

=EtosLqJ

oçl--

P

I(úOcLfPOJ

-oc(o

-cEìc.9

f(J.9E

PcCJ

Eo

OJvlOJL

É.ú.-oc(E

¿

Eoç:(!

oP

Ecoa-OJ

cOJ

EqJ

PPqJØCJL(o

g

CJ

oOJ

È-ocñj

EoLþL'=ct.=oP15coa-6OJL

PcCJ

ECJ

FOJ

AJL(o(J

CJPøoFCJg

o-

EoçIU(,)

oP't3ca-ØCJL

PcOJ

EAJP

OJ

OJ

(o

L(u

oF(U

:¿UEoL

f,rt.goìocoa-OJL

c(u

Eo

qJ

AJ

(oO

qJ

oO

-_i

jEoLç=(g(,)

P:oco-\/l

L

fPñPØ

cOJ

EG)TPCJ

OJL

oo

CJ

:=f(t.cPgCJ

rgo-

AJ

o

-oCoa-CJL

c-l

n=P(gP

PcOJ

EOJ

P

CJ

qJL

øq)

:r=ã.ccqJLroo-

CJ

Øo

OJØCoo-OJL

qc,Pco(-)

OJ

co{P'C ¡r

¿v:-c-oU'U:fCroc >(9 ØõPôç=

õ: o rE(Jvq:6'- -:¿ - '-

!NIoots!ñl!

=--Þ¡PX.--lu(o-.LC ñr CO

aE.ô€õËitcØ.lu>

JibË9õq(lJ!9P JcPCofqor(UAi^DP

Ø

=crbro;:L!ôçYØ+Ls3;e.'--Os Êç 3ØL=cù5HaìYP<urg

=ØuL^rEgucJ'=sçPLCJOØtrØcÈ;,oovç,_tn (U rg dr

rv!

:f,ú>0JHEôbE-o oEõ 3

=õõ€E.9! il: &6L:õ.ã X orÈ õÈnÞ3àcJÈ.=-o(J

(-!

fPloP

PcCJ

ECJ

FoOJ

OJ

L'5o.=PcqJL(oo_

CJ

oçcLfPqJL

o_OJ

XCJcuìfPruPØPcoEo

qJ

0.)L

LGJ

_oECJ

EØ(U

(J(o

Eroo'cLP

q'-oc'-o

=(o(J

P.;

oñLO_IEoE.cõ(oP.tt Cooo8P(U-oØc:

âucJ o-LØ

_Ø

cOJ

loo_LOJPØo

Fcc(o

=Pro

PcqJ

ECJ

FPOJr^CJL

JJPcOJ

tõô-

OJPØo

LL

E

ç--'io coc __:G,,o:tr

UsL -c

ØFCJõ3ECJC'-ñoJ(oX(J CJ

q-.c!.9ØØ-_ofolPrû

ouruoPLLñaJØçcoJo;:LPro oJoØ(UuØi

tsõlgØ==ð-o

oJCP

toc)-oPO-h^

=ccJ'r= -o(Þô+j;Ea? 'ad9*Cogboõo.9aP.goo-cE3rú '-ìE(\tõØ0Jc.9 oJ>LE3

ô?

(\I

(E

CJ

-oEoEv)(õõoPEcoo_qG.)L

'rlc.9tg

.gD

.!çoc{=(oc(o

a-XOJ

!cloØ=ñ

cOJ

EoPCJ

OJ

àEtosLCJ

o-cEì(oCJ

ço

o,q-cõc(o

L.iïôEoçC

'P(ocLo

F.=ço

-Y(Jñi.9P(o

.goEçov)

=P(gP

OJ

PcqJ

rod^L;¡'I.YôoçôU L

¡gC(J(UeF

f(úõELP

qrl

PcCJ

(Ûa-LCJPØos(o

ELs!rU(,)

oPEca-AJL

.1rl 'JlO

(\o

rlÄ

il

cir-l o?

r-lJ.r-l

4cn

c!Ä

qF-{

ôeO

T-l

ñco LN

cir{

".ì

qFl

c]rô

!OJ

LLC)ç-l

AJP(õPrnOO)

ECJ

LLOc-l

CJ

foPtnOo)

EOJ

LLOç-l

4.,

(ÞPrnOOr

ECJ

LLOç-l

QJ

roPrnOo)

EqJ

LLOç-l

CJ

roP(nOo)

'lJCJIOrlAJP(ú

tn()O)

ECJtIOrlqJ

ro

rnOr

ìo(U

LorlqJP(õPtnOOì

!CJ

LLOF-l

(U

(UPU)OOì

!qJ

LLOFl

o(oPtnOO)

ECJ

LLOr-lAJProPVIOO)

-(fCJll-Orlo(o

\nO

ECJu-OïlCJ

(o

tnoO)

-oqJ

LLOr-lCJ

(o

r./)OCll

EqJ

LLOr-lOJPñPttlOO)

EAJ

LLOr-lCJP(oPtttOo)

ECJ

LLOr-lCJP(!PVIOO)

J

FoFcôl\n

f-*r-lOc!acr)

Ln

l--ç-laNO(\l--

Þ-ç-lo(\F-lc{l-r

r.*r-.tOc\Lnc\¡

t-

r-rç-lONLn(\l--

t-..r-lOc\¡

l-r(\l--

l-rç-lOr\

cO

t-.rlac\Or-lcO

l-rr-lOa\rnF-l

oo

l-rF-lO(\O(\cO

l-rr-lONOcooo

It-r-lO(\(oO)

It-r-lONco\-lNF-l

l'.r-lor\Lô

(\rl

oOr-lONr-lNc\

ftrçlOr\l-rOl

l-.r-lONr-l(\

co

=(.-)co

=(_)

co

BL)

co

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=Uco

=(_.)

co

=Uco

=Uco

B(Jco

=(Jco

=UcÊ

=UcÊ

=(Jco

=U


co,FCLLrJt^q,ô

.qJ,-f,d.=-octo

PcCJ

EEo

cO(oo-

OJ

oFbo

;c(o

cOJ

EAJP

CJØG)

PcqJL(oo-LqJPoçoP

I(gUOJ

-YñE

ÞooEctoPcq.)

çOJ

FPOJ

c.eP(E

Ø(!C)

ocq.)

=-cQOJ

oçEclg

PgOJ

Fors'coJ=POo,='-õocP(D9Øñ-uo)trtroJoL(J

o:=l<t.gEc(o

coEEoQboo

!cõPcGJ

EOJ

PqJ

ØØ(U¡o

cCJ

(oo-LCJ

oço!(oOclOJL

cOJ

EAJ

AJ

o¡.!þ(úboOJL

c.9PloEo.=Lo

-og(U()o-c3cOJ

(Uo_LOJP

o+to

_cv=-:lloP

co)EAJPPCJ

c.9(Jro

rú¡CJ

Pc(uLCO

o_

c.)

oç-aoEtoEIñ(J(ocøocJÞ'-

õfìoo(oCc'-L!

6ñLq

c (¡J(ÞçÕL^ogufo¡

=oo-€F

bo.=Eg(Uo¡CJL

coEEo(JT]ctõOJ

.(J

o=(oUbo.='uLroÞoOJL

ØCJ

:==5.gcOJ

filo_

OJ

ossobo=crEf;qrõlg0JfØ

(J

o(U

.9occ(U

Ea-)POJ

OJ

I(o(J

qJ

-cP

cL:JPCJ

-ocroØPC(lJLño-

oP

Eoç:(E

EAJ

qJ

') -vCJ(J()(oE.o

bo.=

roooOJ

.cJ

f,q.=õc(U

6PcocEUo¡oEctû

PcqJ

loo_

OJPq

v(g(J

Gco,Pa:¿(U

Sõ=E0i oJ

cLf,qJ

-ocru

cOJcCJvqJ

c.9CJ(o

rocõ0JarELoJØFcqJAJØño-õgãocsOç'EPqr(;=qo

=L(oGJE}UL'=(o>o(!U1

^ õ.:UEC-(f oJ(oL^(õ

Lc o.)qJP

-.n o

cGJ-Ëo(JcAJ

rco_LOJP

oço¡o

!cõPcqJ

ECJ

PPCJ

c.F

(!

(EE

EEø_9CP(UoJLVIAbô

0JyØ(õoÞoF(uÉØø.9(õ '=-dC-L.=f-6EL (tt

g

oP

oFboo:oc(g

Tñ(Jc=op'cAJcoJp

õ9vtÈtn AJth=(õ jJ?-ì o)

Eo¡-.EËEc.J(oLb¡(u c.)Q-LLtnCJ CJ

Lô .:o5þo-E.=o-Ø(o:ØIOP

oËUCotO(JPP

LõpØlo

Þ¡.=-(frõþoqJ

co.F

OJfctoPEcoo-ØOJL

õcfg

cCJ

ECJ

POJv)c{=Qro

(oõ9orOØ,F(J

t9QJ .'L(J(o_-cbõPPØcç -Sõ=FPPCJ OJ

PcCJ

(õo_

CJP

oçÞoo+jcCJ

EAJPP0-)Ø(Uø.9ØP(sOõcCJE-

:lU(oPQCPCJctrEõoF.U.9 b¡Øc.É -cl

Fro=Þ¡íeCJLØ

o)

ru :f(!cc'-0J-.oõOØ>P c;arcECJç6O

-oc

c(UgqJ

o-oc(o

.t=3ñOJ

(u(J

OJP

oçcoçCJ

-cPCJ

x0rfEo

tØo15(Uo-ËCJ {:

ol;F=oqPU:0JroLLJ)

PctÞf.9ybogq)

OJ

E(o

!c:lçoP

(o

fçCJ

CJL

=õ'ooq.)

Ec(oPcoECJ

CJ

fo-o(oqJ

-oo_

=c)

ØPcqJLloa-LCJPo+:rú(J

oPCJ

roPr,/)

oP

-c(JtoqJLP

=o15cCo

cCJcqJ

OJ

ooL

=(õ+ooc

ro(oboCJ

9eiçqryLFõ::au,lqJõãqçU

Eboocç-OØC(uç(JP

Ø|-(U

ocJL L

o(!

=CJ

AJg

=P(o

.90¡qJ

bo.S'ìã(oboqJ

-cPJ

LOJPØo+Pfo

I

Eq-)

boro

-ocro

PcAJ

roo-qJ

ulPocç(J

EEoaJÈF'PØ0J:Ø(lJUU_cCPLJ vPCcJf

!

roUCfPoJELC.- -Ø!ÉEo(ÞP

b¡(oo9*oJÞ¡L

.c_ _øE(U(ofÞ¡POJ(oLÏ;

c 'õbocJP(ú!trcI(oou)çfCP

l1'ÔPîØ>có9

L

Bqr-c¡J.P- oJ>Ø/ooz=ígbE'6Øo=ç:_uFLoxro*(Jö

cçfcOJY!ç

c):tfÞ

O

,t;l-*

OqLNf-rN

O,4(\rls-l

O.Jla{ç-l

O4C\r-lr-l

O4c!(Or-l

o4ÔJ(o

O,-r)(\F-lc\¡

OqLnÈrLN

O.-r.)

(\(O

O,rlc!(Oc-l

OqoLn

oqLnt-

O4t--oos

OqOC)ñl

OlJll'rcOco

OqOLnLN

O4l--cO

tLJoT

(oU

.!N

qo

ç-lÄ

qO

o1ç-l 'J.lO

|.ìri

(O+

.-1.)

ao?il

<:O

qO

qm

(o..ì

\a{ + 'Jl

cO

collt(Joa

ECJ

LLOrJqJP(oPLnOOl

oo

LLOr-lOJProPU)OOl

ELLor-lCJ

roPU)Ooì

EqJ

LLoF-l

CJPloP(nOOì

E(U

LLor-lOJPro

rnOO)

-o(UtIOç-lqJ

(U

(nOOl

Ec)

LLOr-lqJP(o

rt)oOì

-o(U

LOr-{

AJ

(U

tnOOl

ioCJ

IOc{

AJ

(õPrnOì

'15CJ

LL

ç-lqJ

CO

rnOo)

Eo

L!Oc"lqJ

rgP(nOOr

õc)

LLOrlqJP(úP\nOOì

ECJtLOr-lOJP(õPtnOoì

Eo

LLC)ç-l

OJ

ñPrnOol

EOJ

LLOç-l

AJPõPrnOoì

-oCJ

LLOç-l

AJP(oP(rlOo)

roOJLOrtAJP(úP\nOoì

-oOJIOr-lCJ

(tPtnOoì

c,P(!ô

l-rF-tONLn

f'-s-lO(\(o

$

l-rr-lOa\l-rs

l--rlO(\l-r$

ÈrrlOc\t-s

t-rlO(\r-lrls

¡-.r-lOc{F-lrl

t-rr{ONr-lr-l<.

Þ-ç-lON(\ç-l

sf

r--ç-lOc!mTl<.

r-rç-lOC\l--r{s

t--.ç-lOc.lcoil

sf

Itrr-lOc\sc{\t

r--ç-lONF-l

r.r)

r-rFtON(\Lô

Þrr-lOc\cO

Ø

Þrç-lOc\sl.r)

Þ-ç-lOc.l

Ln

LN

LOJ

CI

Bro

J

LLIô LIJô LLJô LIJo LUô u-Jô LlJô LIJô LUô IJJô L¡Jo LUô LIJô LIJô LlJô L¡Jô


F-zlo

LNìco(o\cô<J'l

LN\coF-l.f4J.r

l¿Jt--

É.

OqLNc!ç-l<J'l

oqLNc!r-l<J'l

(^É,foT

rnc-l

dco

rnô?co

.gCLvl

o\OO)

òsOFI

pL)o(J

LLJ

FF\n

ôLULL

OJcLo

LLJâ

_ØofIE

'b¡CJ

!cñcqJ

çqJ

PP(J

coECJ

toEo_

=Þ¡.=-oL(gÞ¡AJL

ØcqJL(Þo-LCJP

ocF (IJoçØ(u

:PfcõØ--UC

L¿oço-o=P>ló3oo

P=qìlo

c'e(U

(o(J

oPcOJ

EAJPPq)

-octob¡,cEcf

coCJ

(oEa-foL

PcOJ

too-LqJP

o+=ñU

aqLÔNr.{

aqOOr-t

r-l coo 'J)co

co

!CJ

LLOrlCJPto\nOOt

!OJ

LLOil

OJPñPttOO)

J

FoFcof\,/)

l--rlOc..l

lr)LÔ

l--rl(\co

LN

LIJô LIJô


Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Pro Hac Vice Pro Hac Vice

Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 348 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 10109

EXHIBIT F


Aarons v. BMW of N. Am., LLC

Blum v. Stenson

Carson v. Billings Police Dept.

Christensen v. Stevedoring Serv. of America

Hensley v. Eckerhart

Hopson v. Hanesbrands Inc.

HSH Nordbank v. Swerdlow et al.

Jordan v. Multnomah County

La Asociacion de Trabajadores de Lake Forest v. City of Lake Forest

Odrick v. UnionBanCal Corp.

In re Pac. Enterprises Securities Litig.



Rodriguez v. W. Publ’g Corp.

Six Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers

Staton v. Boeing Co.

In re Washington Pub. Power Supply Sys. Sec. Litig.

Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Wren v. RGIS Inventory Specialists



—

—

See Foster Parents Offer Safe Haven

See



see



—



See

id.

see



limine

Id.

See

See



.

See

See



all

See



See

See

—



in

limine



See

See



Rodriguez v.

W. Publ’g Corp.

Staton v. Boeing Co.

Rodriguez .

See Aarons v. BMW of N. Am., LLC



See Aarons

Odrick v. UnionBanCal Corp.

Hopson v. Hanesbrands Inc.



Six

Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers

La Asociacion de Trabajadores de Lake Forest v. City of Lake Forest



See

legally required

id.

id.

id.



see

Hensley v. Eckerhart

Jordan v. Multnomah County

Id.



In re

Pac. Enterprises Securities Litig.

Jordan

See



Christensen v.

Stevedoring Serv. of America Blum

v. Stenson

Id.

In re Washington Pub. Power Supply

Sys. Sec. Litig.



See Wren v. RGIS Inventory Specialists

See

Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Carson v. Billings

Police Dept.



particularly

See

See

supra.

See



— —

See HSH Nordbank v.

Swerdlow et al.

—

—

—

See

Daubert limine



California State Foster Parent Association v. Wagner

Wagner

—

See



id.

Wagner



Davis v. KHNL/KGMB, LLC



Davis v. KHNL/KGMB,

LLC

Hawaii Glaziers Trust Funds v. Island

Glazing Inc.



E.R.K. v. State of Hawaii

Department of Educ.



See E.R.K.

BlueEarth Biofuels v.

Hawaiian Electronic Company



See

BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Inc.

higher

See Civil

Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. v. Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention



California

State Foster Parent Assoc. v. Wagner



985142v2



985142v2 // 11436-1



985142v2 // 11436-1

J.W. et al. v. Pierce County et al.

Jane Doe 1 et al. v. Harold Clarke, et al.

Kaleuati v. Tonda



985142v2 // 11436-1

Waters v. Housing and Community Dev. Corp. of Hawaiì

Smith v. Housing & Community Dev. Corp. of Hawaiì

Arnone v. Housing & Community Dev. Corp. of Hawaiì

Blake v. Nishimua



985142v2 // 11436-1

Shea v. Kahuku

Korab v. Koller

Bohn v. Koller

McMillon v. State of Hawai`i Public Housing Authority

Faletogo v. State of

Hawai`i



California State Foster Parent



Association et al., v. Wagner

New York State Citizens’

Coalition for Children v. Carrion

Henry A., et al. v. Willden, Director of the

Nevada Dept. of Health and Human Services, et al



cum laude




EXHIBIT A



EXHIBIT B


Ah Chong v. WongSheehey v. State of Hawaii

119 Merchant Street, Ste 605Honolulu, Hawai`i, 96813Tel: (808) 587-7605


EXHIBIT C



EXHIBIT D


supplemental (not basic board)




EXHIBIT E


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

E.R.K., by his legal guardian R.K.; R.T.D.,

through his parents, R.D. and M.D.;HAWAII DISABILITY RIGHTS

CENTER, in a representative capacity onbehalf of its clients and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OFEDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-16063

D.C. No. 10-CV-436-DAE

District of Hawaii, Honolulu

ORDER

Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner

IBackground

E.R.K., by his legal guardian R.K.; R.T.D., through his parents, R.D. and

M.D.; and Hawaii Disability Rights Center, in a representative capacity on behalf

of its clients and all others similarly situated (together, “E.R.K.”); brought a class

action against the State of Hawaii Department of Education (“DOE”) alleging

violations of federal law arising from the DOE’s enforcement of Hawaii Act 163's

FILED

APR 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERKU.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MH/APPCOMM 1 2-16063

Case: 12-16063, 04/24/2015, ID: 9507891, DktEntry: 45, Page 1 of 21Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 348-11 Filed 03/28/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 10311

EXHIBIT F


age limit on public education as to the plaintiff class. After a one-day bench trial,

the district court entered judgment in favor of the DOE, and E.R.K. appealed.

This court affirmed the district court’s judgment on E.R.K.’s Americans

with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Rehabilitation Act claims, reversed the district

court’s judgment on E.R.K’s Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”)

claim, and remanded to the district court for proceedings on the IDEA claim. See

E.R.K. ex rel. R.K. v. Haw. DOE, 728 F.3d 982, 993 (9th Cir. 2013).

E.R.K. filed a bill of costs and the Clerk taxed costs against the DOE in the

amount of $390.80. See 28 U.S.C. § 1920; Fed. R. App. P. 39; 9th Cir. R. 39-

1.1S1.5. E.R.K. filed an application for attorneys’ fees under the IDEA, 20 U.S.C.

§ 1415(i). See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.6. The DOE filed an objection, and E.R.K. filed a

reply. See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.7. The court referred to the Appellate Commissioner

the determination of the attorneys’ fees application. See 9th Cir. R. 39-1.9.

IIAnalysis

A. Applicable Law

The IDEA, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i), provides that “[i]n any action or proceeding

brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award reasonable

attorneys’ fees as part of the costs . . . to a prevailing party.” The court may reduce




the fee award where “the amount of attorneys’ fees otherwise authorized to be

awarded unreasonably exceeds the hourly rate prevailing in the community for

similar services by attorneys of reasonably comparable skill, reputation, and

experience,” or “the time spent and legal services furnished were excessive

considering the nature of the action or proceeding.” Id.; see also Blum v. Stenson,

465 U.S. 886, 895 & n.11 (1984); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983).

B. Entitlement To Attorneys’ Fees Award

The DOE argues that E.R.K. may not be awarded attorneys’ fees because

this action was not brought under 20 U.S.C. § 1415. See Lucht v. Molalla River

Sch. Dist., 225 F.3d 1023, 1028 (9th Cir. 2000). The DOE argues that the

complaint sought declaratory and injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and

2202, rather than judicial review of an administrative hearing decision regarding

the denial of a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”). See 20 U.S.C.

§ 1415(f), (g), (i). The DOE also argues that an administrative hearing officer

lacks jurisdiction to determine whether Hawaii Act 163 violates federal law. The

DOE’s argument lacks merit.

Sections 2201 and 2202 create remedies, and do not authorize causes of

action. This court’s opinion states that “[t]he complaint asserted claims under the

IDEA.” See E.R.K. ex rel. R.K., 728 F.3d at 985. E.R.K.’s cause of action is




authorized by the IDEA, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i) and (l). Contrary to the DOE’s

argument, E.R.K.’s complaint challenged the denial of a FAPE. Id. E.R.K. sought

a declaration that the DOE’s refusal to provide class members with a FAPE after

age 20 violated 20 U.S.C. § 1412(a), and sought to enjoin the DOE to provide a

FAPE until class members reached age 22. Id. at 986-92. E.R.K.’s complaint did

not request invalidation of Hawaii Act 163, as the DOE argues, and this court did

not do so. Id. at 992. The court held that the DOE’s enforcement of Hawaii Act

163 to deny class members a FAPE after age 20 violates the IDEA. Id.

Moreover, E.R.K.’s complaint alleged that R.T.D. and two other named

plaintiffs requested administrative hearings regarding the discontinuance of their

FAPEs. In addition, the district court eventually determined that the named

plaintiffs had exhausted their administrative remedies under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)

and (g), or were not required to do so. See 20 U.S.C. § 1415(l); N.D. v. Haw.

DOE, 600 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2010) (plaintiffs demonstrating that defendant

has adopted policy or pursued general practice contrary to law need not exhaust

administrative remedies); Hoeft v. Tucson Unified Sch. Dist., 967 F.2d 1298, 1305,

1307 (9th Cir. 1992) (policy or practice is contrary to law if the question whether it

violates IDEA is a question of law, and the agency was afforded an opportunity to

consider and correct errors). Also, the district court and this court resolved




R.T.D’s separate appeal from an administrative hearing decision by adopting the

decision in E.R.K. See R.T.D. ex rel. R.D. v. Haw. DOE, 539 Fed. App’x 774, 775

(9th Cir. 2013).

This court has stated that the broadly worded provision for attorneys’ fees

“in any action or proceeding” brought under 20 U.S.C. § 1415 does not restrict

attorneys’ fees only to cases where parents of a disabled child opt to pursue an

administrative hearing, and suggests that there is more than one type of proceeding

in which a court is authorized to award fees. See Lucht, 225 F.3d at 1027. Other

circuits have affirmed awards of attorneys’ fees under § 1415 in class actions for

violations of the IDEA. See Blackman v. Dist. of Columbia, 633 F.3d 1088, 1090-

92 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Keene v. Zelman, 337 Fed. App’x 553, 554, 558 (6th Cir.

2009); Beard v. Teska, 31 F.3d 942, 945-46, 958 (10th Cir. 1994). E.R.K. may be

awarded attorneys’ fees here.

C. Amount Of Attorneys’ Fees Award

E.R.K. requests attorneys’ fees on appeal in the amount of $57,483.58 for

134.5 hours of work by attorney Jason H. Kim of Schneider Wallace Cottrell

Konecky LLP in San Francisco, California; attorney Paul Alston and paralegal

Kelly K.M. Guadagno of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing in Honolulu, Hawaii; and

attorney Matthew C. Bassett of the Hawaii Disability Rights Center in Honolulu,




Hawaii. E.R.K. also requests Hawaii general excise taxes in the amount of

$227.73 on Alston’s and Guadagno’s fees.

1. Reasonable Hourly Rates

E.R.K. requests the following hourly rates for the legal professionals, and

the DOE objects to all of the requested rates:

Legal Professional Position Admission Date Hourly Rate

Paul Alston Director 1971 $592.52

Jason H. Kim Of Counsel 1998 $500.00

Matthew C. Bassett Litigation Director 1986 $285.00

Kelly K.M. Guadagno Paralegal N/A $125.00

a. Paul Alston

E.R.K. requests $592.52 per hour for Paul Alston, an experienced Hawaii

law firm director, appellate litigator, and bar leader admitted to practice in 1971.

The requested hourly rate is based on a Hawaii district court award of Alston’s

2011 hourly billing rate of $567, adjusted for inflation, in a commercial dispute.

Alston states here that his 2012-13 hourly billing rate is $695 for new business

clients in complex commercial cases, and that he is handling “much work” for

clients at that rate. “That a lawyer charges a particular hourly rate, and gets it, is

evidence bearing on what the market rate is, because the lawyer and his clients are



Paul Alstonaa Director 1971 $592.52


part of the market.” Carson v. Billings Police Dep’t, 470 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir.

2006).

The DOE argues that $300 per hour should be awarded for Alston, because

that is the highest rate that the Hawaii district court has allowed in IDEA cases.

This argument lacks merit. The court may not rely exclusively on awards in IDEA

cases to determine a market rate for Alston’s services. See Prison Legal News v.

Schwarzenegger, 608 F.3d 446, 455 (9th Cir. 2010); Christensen v. Stevedoring

Servs. of Am., 557 F.3d 1049, 1054 (9th Cir. 2009); Van Skike v. Dir., OWCP, 557

F.3d 1041, 1046-47 (9th Cir. 2009); Moreno v. City of Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106,

1115 (9th Cir. 2008). To reflect Congress’s intent in the IDEA’s fee-shifting

provision to encourage counsel to undertake IDEA cases, fees must be awarded for

Alston that are commensurate with those he could obtain by taking other kinds of

cases. See Van Skike, 557 F.3d at 1047; Camacho v. Bridgeport Fin., Inc., 523

F.3d 973, 981 (9th Cir. 2008).

Thus, the Hawaii award in a non-IDEA case of $567 per hour for Alston’s

2011 work is relevant evidence of the prevailing market rate. In addition, this

court recently awarded Alston’s pre-2011 hourly billing rate of $540 in BlueEarth

Biofuels, LLC, v. Haw. Elec. Co., No. 11-16848 (9th Cir. Sept. 3, 2014) (Order).

The DOE does not provide evidence to rebut the reasonableness of the requested



Thus, the Hawaaa ii awaaa rd in a non-IDEA ca ase of $567 per hour for Alston’s

2011 work is relevant ea vidence of the prevailing market rate. In addition, this

court recently ay warded Alston’s pre-2011 hourly billing ray teaa of $540 in BlueEarthee

Biofuels, LLC, vCC . Haw. Elec. CoCC ., No. 11-16848 (9th Cir. Sept. 3, 2014) (Order).


$592.50 hourly rate for Alston, or support its contention that $300 is a reasonable

hourly rate for Alston. See Camacho, 523 F.3d at 980 (9th Cir. 2008); Gates v.

Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1397-98 (9th Cir. 1992). The requested $592.52

hourly rate is reasonable for Alston’s 2012-13 work in this case, and it is awarded.

b. Jason H. Kim

E.R.K. requests $500 per hour, or in the alternative $300 per hour, for Jason

H. Kim, an experienced San Francisco trial and appellate litigator admitted to

practice in 1998. During the litigation, Kim left Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing in

Honolulu and became “of counsel” at Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP in

San Francisco, where he continued to work on the case. The requested $500

hourly rate for Kim is based on San Francisco market rates, but E.R.K.

acknowledges that $300 per hour is reasonable for Kim if Honolulu is considered

to be the relevant market.

The DOE argues that $275 per hour should be awarded for Kim, because

Honolulu is the relevant market and there is no evidence of Kim’s experience in

IDEA litigation. The DOE provides evidence of Hawaii district court awards of

$275 to $300 per hour for 2010-13 IDEA work by attorneys admitted in 1988 and

earlier. The DOE’s argument has partial merit. Generally, the relevant market is



The requested $592.52

hourly ray te is reasonablea for Alston’s 2012-13 work in this case, and it is aaa waaa rded.


the forum district. See Camacho, 523 F.3d at 979. Honolulu is the relevant market

here, in part because Kim began representing the class while employed there.

But the court may not rely exclusively on awards in IDEA cases, or Kim’s

experience in IDEA cases, to determine a market rate for Kim’s services. See

Prison Legal News, 608 F.3d at 455. Fees must be awarded for Kim that are

commensurate with those he could obtain by taking other kinds of cases. See Van

Skike, 557 F.3d at 1047; Camacho, 523 F.3d at 981. Alston states that the

requested $300 hourly rate for Kim “is well within the range of reason for

attorneys with similar experience in this community.” Because the DOE’s

evidence involves only IDEA cases, it does not rebut Alston’s declaration.

Alston’s declaration is corroborated by this court’s award in BlueEarth of a 2011

or earlier hourly billing rate of $280 for an attorney admitted in 1998. E.R.K.’s

requested $300 hourly rate for Kim’s 2012-13 work is reasonable and is awarded.

c. Matthew C. Bassett

E.R.K. requests $285 per hour for Matthew C. Bassett, the litigation director

of the Hawaii Disability Rights Center, who was admitted to practice in 1986. The

requested hourly rate is based on the Hawaii district court’s award of $275 per

hour for 2008-09 IDEA work by Bassett. The DOE argues that $275 remains a

reasonable hourly rate for Bassett. This argument lacks merit. Bassett’s rate for




the 2012-13 work here should reflect a reasonable increase from the 2008-09 rates

awarded by the district court. Also, the court may not rely exclusively on awards

in IDEA cases. See Prison Legal News, 608 F.3d at 455. The requested $285

hourly rate for Bassett is reasonable and is awarded.

d. Kelly K.M. Guadagno

E.R.K. requests $125 per hour for Kelly K.M. Guadagno, who has 21 years

of experience as a litigation paralegal in Honolulu. Alston states that Guadagno’s

rate “is well within the range of reason for paralegals with similar experience in

this community.” The DOE argues that $85 per hour should be awarded for

Guadagno, based on awards in IDEA cases. But the DOE does not cite the cases,

or state when the work was performed. In BlueEarth, this court awarded $145 per

hour for a Honolulu paralegal employed by Alston with 22 years of experience.

The requested $125 hourly rate for Guadagno is reasonable and is awarded.

2. Reasonably Expended Hours

On Ninth Circuit Form 9, E.R.K. claims the legal professionals spent the

requested 134.5 hours performing various services on appeal, as follows:




Services Alston Kim Bassett Guadagno Hours

Conferences 0.8 8.5 0 3.0 12.3

Records 1.9 0 3.9 0 5.8

Research 0 4.3 0 0.2 4.5

Briefs 0 45.8 0 11.0 56.8

Oral Argument 0.9 31.2 3.2 0 35.3

Other 0 10.2 2.2 7.4 19.8

Total Hours 3.6 100.0 9.3 21.6 134.5

E.R.K. requests fees for filing a mediation questionnaire, a letter confirming

an extension of time to file the opening brief, a notice of appearance, an 8,275-

word opening brief, three volumes of excerpts of record, a motion to consolidate

the appeal with R.T.D’s separate appeal, a 3,238-word reply brief, a bill of costs,

and a motion for attorneys’ fees. E.R.K. does not request fees for filing a reply to

the DOE’s opposition to the attorneys’ fees motion.

E.R.K. also requests fees for Kim’s, Alston’s, and Bassett’s preparation for

and attendance at the oral argument in Honolulu, which was presented by Kim.

This appeal was consolidated for the purpose of oral argument with R.T.D.’s

separate appeal.

The DOE objects that the requested hours should be reduced.




a. Degree Of Success

The DOE argues that E.R.K.’s hours should be reduced because E.R.K.

prevailed on appeal on the IDEA claim, but not on the ADA or Rehabilitation Act

claims. See E.R.K., 728 F.3d at 993. This argument lacks merit. When a

prevailing party succeeds on only some claims, the court must consider whether:

(1) the party failed to prevail on claims that were unrelated to the claims on which

the party succeeded; and (2) the party achieved a level of success that makes the

hours reasonably expended a satisfactory basis for the fee award. See Hensley, 461

U.S. at 434; McCown v. City of Fontana, 565 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009).

The Hensley analysis applies in IDEA cases. See Aguirre v. Los Angeles Unified

Sch. Dist., 461 F.3d 1114, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2006).

E.R.K.’s claims involve a common core of facts and are based on related

legal theories. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434; McCown, 565 F.3d at 1103; Webb v.

Sloan, 330 F.3d 1158, 1169 (9th Cir. 2003); Odima v. Westin Tucson Hotel, 53

F.3d 1484, 1499 (9th Cir. 1995). E.R.K.’s claims of violation of the IDEA’s

requirement to provide a FAPE to disabled children through age 22 and E.R.K’s

claims of disability discrimination in violation of the ADA and the Rehabilitation

Act arise together from the DOE’s refusal to provide class members aged 20 to 22




with FAPEs in Hawaii’s General Education Development and Competency Based

programs at the Community Schools for Adults.

The DOE concedes that the ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims are similar

to each other, and that there is “overlap in the factual information” regarding all

three claims. At least one court has determined that IDEA and Rehabilitation Act

claims arising from a failure to provide a FAPE to a disabled child are related. See

Mass. Dep’t of Public Health v. Sch. Comm. of Tewksbury, 841 F. Supp. 449, 457

(D. Mass. 1993).

A review of the time records shows that E.R.K.’s attorneys’ and paralegal’s

time was devoted generally to the appeal as a whole, making it difficult to divide

the hours expended on a claim-by-claim basis. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435. For

the purposes of an attorney’s fees award, E.R.K.’s action cannot be viewed as a

series of discrete claims, and the court must focus on the significance of the overall

relief obtained in relation to the hours reasonably expended on the appeal. Id.

E.R.K. obtained an excellent result on appeal, because the court’s remand of

the IDEA claim requires further proceedings that may result in an award of all the

relief that E.R.K. sought pursuant to any of the claims -- the continuation of class

members’ FAPEs through age 22. Therefore, E.R.K. should recover a fully

compensatory attorneys’ fee. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435; McCown, 565 F.3d at




1104. “Litigants in good faith may raise alternative legal grounds for a desired

outcome, and the court’s rejection of . . . certain grounds is not a sufficient reason

for reducing a fee.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435.

Thus, E.R.K.’s attorneys and paralegal’s reasonably expended hours in

pursuit of the ultimate result achieved may be included in the attorney’s fees

award, with no reduction based on degree of success. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at

434-35; McCown, 565 F.3d at 1103-04.

b. Clerical Work

The DOE objects to 6.7 hours requested for Kim, arguing that the work was

clerical in nature and therefore may not be billed at an attorney’s hourly rate. See

Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 288 n.10 (1989); Tr. of Constr. Indus. &

Laborers Health & Welfare Tr. v. Redland Ins. Co., 460 F.3d 1253, 1257 (9th Cir.

2006). The DOE’s objection has partial merit.

Kim’s supervision of paralegal Guadagno’s and D. Ahuna’s preparation and

filing of the opening brief, excerpts of record, and bill of costs, as well as Kim’s

call to the Clerk about oral argument, were clerical in nature. See Davis v. City &

Cnty. of San Francisco, 976 F.2d 1536, 1543 (9th Cir. 1992); Action on Smoking &

Health v. CAB, 724 F.2d 211, 222 (D.C. Cir. 1984). On September 22, 2013,

however, Kim block-billed 4 hours that involved permissible work on the




attorneys’ fees application in addition to the clerical work of “[c]ompiling attorney

time in required format.” See Missouri, 491 U.S. at 288 n.10. Therefore, only 1

hour on this date is attributable to clerical work.

In addition to the hours to which the DOE objects, Kim also billed 3.2 hours

on July 17 and 18, 2012, August 20, 2012, and May 10, 2013 for the clerical work

of compiling and filing the excerpts of record. Id.; Action on Smoking & Health,

724 F.2d at 222. Altogether, 2.8 hours in the conferences category, 2.8 hours in

the briefs category, 0.1 hour in the oral argument category, and 1.2 hours in the

“other” category are disallowed for Kim’s clerical work.

Also, 0.1 hour in the records category for Alston’s May 14, 2013 review of a

Clerk notice regarding electronic submission of the excerpts of record and 2.9

hours in the conference category, 0.2 hours in the research category, 11 hours in

the briefs category, and 0.5 hours in the “other” category for Guadagno’s August

16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 27, 2012 and August 28, 29, and September 4, 2013

compilation of information for the excerpts of record, bill of costs, and attorneys’

fees application are disallowed as clerical work. Id.




c. Co-Counsel Conferences

The DOE objects to 5.1 hours requested for Kim’s conferences with co-

counsel. But these hours include 1.4 hours on May 10, 2013 that do not involve

co-counsel conferences and have been disallowed as clerical in nature.

In support of this objection, the DOE cites Sheehan v. Centex Homes, 853 F.

Supp. 2d 1031, 1044 (D. Haw. 2011), where the district court stated that it did not

permit more than one attorney to bill for attending a meeting with co-counsel, a

client, or opposing counsel. The DOE does not show, however, that the specified

hours for Kim involved meetings that were also billed by another legal

professional. In fact, the time entries to which the DOE objects do not involve

meetings at all, but rather emails from Kim in San Francisco to the other legal

professionals at two law firms in Honolulu.

A review of Kim’s and the others’ time entries, including those submitted in

support of the fee request in R.T.D.’s separate appeal, reveals several instances

where, on the same date that Kim billed for emails, one or more of the other legal

professionals also billed a minimal amount of time for emailing with Kim. Yet

Kim’s and the others’ hours for reciprocal emailing were reasonably expended,

particularly in light of Kim’s relocation to San Francisco and the class plaintiff’s




representation by multiple law firms. The authority cited by the DOE does not

prohibit the award of these hours, and they are awarded.

d. Travel Time

The DOE objects to 16 hours requested for Kim’s round-trip oral argument

travel between San Francisco and Honolulu, contending that Kim may have

performed work for other clients during the time. The DOE contends that no more

than 8 hours should be awarded for the travel, citing two unpublished district court

decisions awarding reduced hours or rates for travel. This objection lacks merit.

There is no evidence that Kim’s travel involved work other than the E.R.K.

oral argument. The Ninth Circuit has affirmed as reasonable a full award of travel

time for client meetings, where the evidence showed that billing travel to clients is

customary. See Davis, 876 F.2d at 1543. Another, more recent district court

decision awarded travel time for an attorney who presented oral argument in the

Ninth Circuit. See Oldoerp v. Wells Fargo & Co. LTD Plan, 2014 WL 2621202, at

*6 (N.D. Cal. 2014). Kim’s travel time was reasonably expended and is awarded.

e. Alston’s And Bassett’s Hours

The DOE objects to E.R.K.’s requested 3.6 hours for Alston and 9.3 hours

for Bassett for reviewing pleadings and preparing for and attending oral argument,




because Kim prepared the pleadings and presented the oral argument. The DOE’s

objection lacks merit.

The court may not determine fees based on speculation about how other

firms might have staffed the case. See Moreno, 534 F.3d at 1114. The inquiry is

limited to whether the fees requested by this particular legal team are justified for

the work performed and the results obtained. Id. E.R.K. states that Alston’s and

Bassett’s assistance was necessary because both were involved in the district court

litigation, Alston is an experienced appellate advocate, and Bassett is an

experienced disability rights advocate.

The time records show that Alston’s and Bassett’s brief review, oral

argument preparation, and oral argument attendance hours were reasonably

expended. In particular, using multiple attorneys for oral argument preparation and

attendance is not unnecessary duplication where, as here, the attorneys attend to

assist the attorney presenting the argument, rather than merely to observe and

learn. See Democratic Party of Wash. State v. Reed, 388 F.3d 1281, 1286-87 (9th

Cir. 2004); Sheehan, 853 F. Supp. 2d at 1044. Alston’s 3.6 hours and Bassett’s 9.3

hours were reasonably expended and they are awarded.




f. Reasonably Expended Hours Summary

A review of the briefs and time records, in light of fee requests in similar

appeals, shows that E.R.K.’s remaining 112.9 hours for the appeal were reasonably

expended. In particular, Kim completed the research and the briefing in a

reasonable number of hours. After the adjustments discussed above for clerical

work, which are in boldface type, E.R.K.’s remaining 112.9 hours are awarded, as

follows:

Services Alston Kim Bassett Guadagno Hours

Conferences 0.7 5.7 0 0.1 6.5

Records 1.9 0 3.9 0 5.8

Research 0 4.3 0 0 4.3

Briefs 0 43.0 0 0 43.0

Oral Argument 0.9 31.1 3.2 0 35.2

Other 0 9.0 2.2 6.9 18.1

Total Hours 3.5 93.1 9.3 7.0 112.9

3. Attorneys’ Fees Award Summary

E.R.K. is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $33,529.32, as follows:




Legal Professional Position Hourly Rate Hours Total

Paul Alston Director $592.52 3.5 $ 2,073.82

Jason H. Kim Of Counsel $300.00 93.1 $27,930.00

Matthew C. Bassett Litigation Director $285.00 9.3 $ 2,650.50

Kelly K.M. Guadagno Paralegal $125.00 7.0 $ 875.00

Total 112.9 $33,529.32

D. Hawaii General Excise Taxes

E.R.K. also requests an award of Hawaii general excise taxes at 4.712

percent on the fees for Alston and Guadagno. See Annette K. v. Haw. DOE, 2013

WL 3731102, at *3-*4 (D. Haw. 2013) (awarding Hawaii general excise taxes at

4.712 percent in IDEA case). The DOE does not object to E.R.K.’s request for the

taxes. The award for Alston and Guadagno has been reduced to $2,948.82 in fees.

Accordingly, E.R.K. is awarded Hawaii general excise taxes in the amount of

$138.95. Id.

III

Conclusion

Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $33,529.32 and Hawaii general excise taxes

in the amount of $138.95 are awarded in favor of E.R.K., by his legal guardian

R.K.; R.T.D., through his parents R.D. and M.D.; and Hawaii Disability Rights

Center, in a representative capacity on behalf of its clients and all others similarly



Paul Alstonaa Director $592.52 3.5 $ 2,073.82


situated; and against the State of Hawaii Department of Education. This order

amends the court’s mandate. See Fed. R. App. P. 41.




Rose Patrocinio - 12-16063 E. K., et al v. State of Hawaii Department of "Appellate Commissioner Order Filed"

From: <[email protected]>To: <[email protected]>Date: 4/24/2015 7:58 AMSubject: 12-16063 E. K., et al v. State of Hawaii Department of "Appellate Commissioner Order Filed"

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was entered on 04/24/2015 at 10:58:11 AM PDT and filed on 04/24/2015

Case Name: E. K., et al v. State of Hawaii Department ofCase Number: 12-16063Document(s): Document(s)

Docket Text:Filed order (Appellate Commissioner):... Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $33,529.32 and Hawaii general excise taxes in the amount of $138.95 are awarded in favor of E.R.K., by his legal guardian R.K.; R.T.D., through his parents R.D. and M.D.; and Hawaii Disability Rights Center, in a representative capacity on behalf of its clients and all others similarly situated; and against the State of Hawaii Department of Education. This order amends the court’s mandate. See Fed. R. App. P. 41. (Appellate Commissioner) [9507891] (DL)

Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Mr. Paul D. Alston, AttorneyMr. Matthew Charles Bassett, Senior Trial AttorneyMr. Jason H. Kim, AttorneyMr. Steve K. Miyasaka, Deputy Attorney GeneralMiss Jennifer Visitacion Patricio, Staff AttorneyHolly T. Shikada, Deputy Assistant Attorney GeneralMr. Carter K. Siu, Deputy Attorney GeneralMr. Gary S. Suganuma, Deputy Attorney GeneralUSDC, Honolulu

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:Document Description: Main DocumentOriginal Filename: 12-16063.pdfElectronic Document Stamp:[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=04/24/2015] [FileNumber=9507891-0] [26f0d6615b29c7c1a17d5d888c4659d5775ec0cf97d359d26c0cd37a51e99ff20946781f8b7009c5c036acad1dd4e732efb1ee4bf2e622d25d3bdf5abe75337e]]



1

MARC N. BERNSTEIN (SBN 145837)1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Email: [email protected] BERNSTEIN LAW GROUP, P.C.555 Montgomery Street, Suite 1650San Francisco, CA 94111Telephone: (415) 765 6633Facsimile: (415) 283 4804

Special Master

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

California State Foster ParentAssociation, California State CareProviders Association, and LegalAdvocates for Permanent Parenting,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

JOHN A. WAGNER, Director of theCalifornia Department of Social Services,in his official capacity; MARY AULT,Deputy Director of the Children andFamily Services Division of theCalifornia Department of Social Services,in her official capacity,

Defendants.

))))))))))))))))))))))

Case No. C 07 5086 WHA (JL)

SPECIAL MASTER’S DECISION ANDORDER REGARDING ATTORNEYS’FEES

In this civil rights action, plaintiffs won summary judgment on some but not

all of their requested relief. The parties agree plaintiffs are “prevailing parties”

entitled to attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988. They dispute the measure of those

fees.

Special Master’s Decision and Order RegardingAttorneys’ Fees Case No. C 07 5086 WHA

Case3:07-cv-05086-WHA Document142 Filed11/08/09 Page1 of 26

EXHIBIT G



2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Plaintiffs acknowledge they did not receive all of the relief they requested.

But they contend they brought a “single Section 1983 claim.” They urge that because

they won on that single claim, they are entitled to 100% of their fees (after

inefficiency reductions).

Defendants, on the other hand, point out that plaintiffs requested both

declaratory and injunctive relief, and won only the former. Plaintiffs sought a

declaration that their federal rights had been violated (which they won); but also an

injunction compelling the state to rectify its behavior (which they did not win). The

result, say defendants, is that plaintiffs’ fees must be cut in half (again after

inefficiency reductions).

After initial briefing on this question, the Court referred the issue to the

undersigned, as Special Master. (Docket No. 134 at 3; Docket No. 137.) The Special

Master ordered supplemental briefing, conducted an extensive hearing, and now

issues this Decision and Order.

For the reasons detailed below, this order concludes plaintiffs achieved an

important, state wide benefit for California’s foster parents, and for the foster

children who live with them. But it also concludes there must be a deduction in fees

for plaintiffs’ failure to obtain injunctive relief. Had an injunction issued, plaintiffs

would have had an immediate enforcement mechanism for their important victory—

contempt sanctions. The failure to get this relief must be taken into account in setting

plaintiffs’ fees.

No party proposed a specific fee reduction in the event plaintiffs’ incomplete

victory required one. Plaintiffs steadfastly insisted on one hundred percent of their

fees, while defendants—acknowledging for the first time at oral argument that the

fee award could not simply be cut in half—proposed only that the award be made as

low as possible. Accordingly, the Special Master developed his own measure for the

deduction. Under that measure, plaintiffs’ fees will be reduced by $32,125.63.


Case3:07-cv-05086-WHA Document142 Filed11/08/09 Page2 of 26Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 348-12 Filed 03/28/17 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 10334


3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Plaintiffs’ are awarded $926,797.12 in attorneys’ fees. The parties agree costs

are $3,372.22. By agreement, there are no fees on fees. (Docket No. 135 at 2.)

I.

In this lawsuit, plaintiffs, three public interest organizations representing

licensed foster parents throughout California, charged defendants, state officials

responsible for the administration of the state’s foster care program, with violations

of the Child Welfare Act (CWA), 42 U.S. C. §§ 670 679b. Under the CWA,

participating states are eligible to receive federal funds for foster care programs, but

in return the states must pay to foster parents “foster care maintenance payments” to

cover the “cost of (and the cost of providing) food, clothing, shelter, daily

supervision, school supplies, a child’s personal incidentals, liability insurance with

respect to a child, and reasonable travel to the child’s home for visitation.” Id. at

§§ 671(a)(2), 672(b)(1); 675(4)(A); 45 C.F.R. § 1356.21(a).

Plaintiffs’ complaint charged that that “California applied for and willingly

accepts this federal funding, but does not cover the costs incurred by foster parents

as required by federal law.” (Docket No. 1 at 2:8 11.) The complaint averred that

California’s statutorily set “basic foster care rates” “need to increase by as much as

61% before they will begin to cover the actual costs of raising a foster child.” (Id. at

2:12 14; see generally, id. at 7 10.) As a result of these deficiencies, the complaint

charged, California has seen a serious decline in the number of families willing to

take in foster children. (Id. at 11 13.)

The complaint culminated in two “Counts” for relief: Count I, for Declaratory

Relief, and Count II, for Permanent Injunctive Relief. (Id. 13 14.) Though styled as

distinct “Counts,” these claims, and the multiple prayers for relief that followed,

were all brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to redress the same deprivation of federal

rights: the state’s failure to make foster care maintenance payments in the manner

required by the Child Welfare Act.



Plaintiffs’ are awarded $926,797.12 in attorneys’ fees. The parties agree costs

are $3,372.22. By agreement, there are no fees on fees.


4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

The precise declaratory and injunctive relief sought is found not in the two

counts, but in the prayers for relief. (Docket No. 1 at 14 15.) Excluding generic

prayers for attorneys’ fees and for such relief “as is just,” plaintiffs requested two

declarations and three injunctions. (Id.) The requested declarations were,

respectively, (1) that defendants violated the Child Welfare Act by “failing to pay

amounts sufficient to cover the costs of (and the costs of providing)” the enumerated

expenses, and (2) that defendants’ existing foster care rates violated plaintiffs’ federal

rights under color of state law. (Id.) Plaintiffs ultimately won a declaration covering

these points.

The three requested injunctions were a different matter. The first of these

sought to enjoin defendants from using their existing foster care rates as a basis to

establish the “foster care maintenance payments” required by the CWA. (Id.) The

second sought to require defendants to “prepare and implement a payment system

that complies with the Child Welfare Act by paying licensed foster parents the costs

of (and the costs of providing)” the enumerated expenses, “in an amount subject to

proof and by adjusting that amount each year by the percentage change in” a state

inflation index. (Id.) With its mandate that the state make foster care payments in an

“amount subject to proof,” this requested injunction apparently contemplated that

the Court would itself determine and set, according to proof, the foster care

maintenance payments required by the CWA. (Id.)

The final requested injunction sought, apparently as an alternative to the

previous injunction, an order setting interim rates pending the defendants’ own

determination and implementation of CWA compliant rates. (Id.)

Plaintiffs’ second requested injunction is not the only place they discuss or

request the imposition of specific, court ordered rates. Under the heading, “The

Rates that California Should Be Paying But Does Not,” the complaint states that

“current actual rates need to be increased by more than $100 per month for every age




5

group of children in order to properly account for just the recent increases in the cost

of living.” (Docket No. 1 at 9:11 17 (emphasis in original).) In their summary

judgment motion, plaintiffs note that “because the requirements of the CWA are

mandatory, the Foster Parents are within their rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to

compel the State to make these payments as required by 42 U.S.C. § 672.” (Docket

No. 89 at 15:14 16 (emphasis added).) Consistent with these asserted rights, the

summary motion goes on to request, among other relief, these court imposed foster

care rates or regimes:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

That the Court grant interim injunctive relief and order Defendants toincrease monthly per child payments to foster parents to the amounts statedin the MARC Report, plus $25 for reasonable travel for home visitation, plusan additional $547 to working parents who enroll the foster child in licensedchild care.

That the Court order Defendants to publish, and present to this Court forapproval, a new schedule of rates sufficient to cover the statutory itemizedcosts with a proposed plan and methodology for future annual review,comment, adjustment, and republication of such rates so that Defendants’payments to foster parents may be expected to cover the statutory expensesin the future.

(Id. at 18.)

On cross motions for summary judgment, the Court denied defendants’

summary judgment motion, and granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs’

motion. (Docket No. 98.) The Court granted plaintiffs’ motion “insofar as plaintiffs

argue that the defendants are in violation of the Act by setting rates without

consideration of the Act’s mandatory costs factors.” (Id. at 11:5 7.) But it denied the

motion “insofar as plaintiffs assert that defendants must be in exact compliance with

its particular measure of child welfare maintenance payments.” (Id. at 11:7 8.)

The plaintiffs thus received their requested declaration that California’s basic

foster care rates violated the Child Welfare Act. But they were denied injunctive

relief of any kind. (Id.)




6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Plaintiffs then moved for attorneys’ fees and costs, as prevailing parties under

42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). (Docket No. 106.) The attorneys’ fees portion of this request

totaled $1,093,363.75, comprising $814,116.25 in fees from Morrison & Foerster LLP,

and $279,247.50 in fees from the Children’s Advocacy Institute (CAI) at the

University of San Diego School of Law. (Docket No. 107 at 3; Docket No. 108 at 3.)

Defendants opposed the motion, conceding plaintiffs’ entitlement to fees as

prevailing parties but disputing the amount of the fees. (Docket No. 119 at 3.)

The Court ordered further submissions with additional billing detail. (Docket

No. 124.) In response, the parties filed supplemental papers. Plaintiffs agreed to

write off certain hours and generally eliminate duplicative billings or inefficiencies.

(Docket Nos. 127, 127 3.) Specifically, plaintiffs agreed to fee reductions totaling

$77,356.50, bringing plaintiffs’ overall fee request to $1,016,007.25. (Docket No. 127 at

5.) Defendants vigorously opposed this fee figure. (Docket No. 128.) They argued

that because plaintiffs lost their requested injunctive relief, they had prevailed on

only half of their claims. (Id. at 3 4.) Defendants thus argued that the “absolute

maximum percentage this Court should allow” was fifty percent of legitimate fees.

(Id.) On this basis, defendants concluded plaintiffs were entitled to “no more than

$291,428.27” in fees, and pointed the Court to an addendum in which it could find

still further suggested reductions for “travel time billings or other inappropriate

billings.” (Id. at 10.)

After additional efforts to facilitate a resolution of this dispute, the Court

ordered the appointment of the undersigned Special Master. (Docket Nos. 134, 137.)

The Court made clear that it “disagrees that the amount of fees awarded should be

exactly halved simply because plaintiffs only obtained relief on half their claims.”

(Docket No. 134 at 2.)

Equally clearly, the Court stated that “some deductions should be made

regarding work done by plaintiffs for claims that did not ultimately bear fruit,”



Plaintiffs then moved for attorneys’ fees and costs, as prevailing parties under

42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). (Docket No. 106.) The attorneys’ fees portion of this request

totaled $1,093,363.75, comprising $814,116.25 in fees from Morrison & Foerster LLP,

and $279,247.50 in fees from the Children’s Advocacy Institute (CAI) at the

University of San Diego School of Law. (Docket No. 107 at 3; Docket No. 108 at 3.)


7

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

noting that “it is an abuse of discretion for the district court to award attorney’s fees

without considering the relationship between the ‘extent of success’ and the amount

of the fees award.” (Id. (citing Farrar v. Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 114 16 (1992)).)

Finding that the parties’ briefing did not sufficiently tie the applicable legal

standards to the results obtained in this case, the Special Master ordered

supplemental briefing. (Docket No. 141.) Plaintiffs’ supplemental papers agreed to a

further fee reduction of $57,084.50, mostly for attorney travel time. (July 24, 2009

Supp. Van Voorhis Decl. at 8.) After these additional write offs, plaintiffs’ fee request

stood where it is today—at $958,922.75, a discount from the initial request of

$134,441, or 12.3%.

Defendants’ supplemental papers incorporated their earlier fee arguments.

(July 31, 2009 Opp. to Suppl. MPA re Fees.) They reiterated their earlier request that

plaintiffs’ fees be halved, and in no event exceed $291,428.27. (Id.)

The Special Master then held an extensive hearing. At the hearing, defendants

withdrew their principal basis for reducing plaintiffs’ fees. They conceded for the

first time that governing case law precluded an arithmetic halving of fees. But they

offered no alternative measure, instead simply asking that fees be set as low as

possible. Plaintiffs maintained their position that because they asserted a single

section 1983 claim and won on that claim, they were entitled to all incurred fees (as

reduced for inefficiencies). Asked what measure would be appropriate if the Special

Master nonetheless concluded plaintiffs’ incomplete relief necessitated a deduction,

plaintiffs declined to offer one.

At the hearing, all parties agreed that plaintiffs’ result in the case was

significant.

II.

In civil rights cases brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, “the court, in its

discretion, may allow the prevailing party . . . a reasonable attorney s fee as part of




8

the costs.” 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 426 (1983). A

“prevailing party” is one who succeeds on “any significant issue” that achieves

“some of the benefit the parties sought in bringing suit.” Id. at 433 (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted). Although section 1988 says the court “may”

award fees, prevailing plaintiffs should generally get them. E.g.,Mendez v. County of

San Bernardino, 540 F.3d 1109, 1126 (9th Cir. 2008).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Here, as noted, it is undisputed that plaintiffs get fees. The only issue is the

measure of fees when, as here, plaintiffs’ success is partial.

In answering this question, courts first ask whether the unsuccessful claims

were “unrelated” to the successful ones. E.g., Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 35;McCown v.

City of Fontana, 565 F.3d 1097, 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). That is, courts ask whether the

plaintiff’s unsuccessful efforts related to “distinctly different claims for relief that are

based on different facts and legal theories.” Id. If so, no fees may be awarded for

work on those claims, and the hours spent on them must be treated as though they

had been spent on a different lawsuit. Id.

Once unrelated claims are excluded, the district court must weigh “the

significance of the overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours

reasonably expended on the litigation.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435;McCown, 565 F.3d at

1103.

“[A] plaintiff who has won substantial relief should not have his attorney’s fee

reduced simply because the district court did not adopt each contention raised.”

Hensley, 461 U.S. at 440. Yet it is also true that “[a] reduced fee award is appropriate

if the relief, however significant, is limited in comparison to the scope of the litigation

as a whole.” Id. at 439 440.

In setting fees after partial victories, courts have uniformly rejected simple

arithmetic proration. E.g., Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435 n.11 (“We agree with the District

Court’s rejection of a mathematical approach comparing the total number of issues in




9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

the case with those actually prevailed upon.”) (internal quotation marks omitted);

McCown, 565 F.3d at 1103 (“the Supreme Court has disavowed a test of strict

proportionality”);McGinnis v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, 51 F.3d 805, 808 09 (9th Cir.

1995) (arithmetic proration “makes no practical sense”). Cf. City of Riverside v. Rivera,

477 U.S. 561, 574 78 (1986) (rejecting a rule of proportionality based on portion of

damages won).

“The initial estimate of a reasonable attorney’s fee is properly calculated by

multiplying the number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation times a

reasonable hourly rate.” Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 888 89; accord Hensley, 461 U.S.

at 433. The product of reasonable hours and reasonable rates is called the “lodestar.”

McCown, 565 F.3d at 1102. A “reasonable hourly rate” is the prevailing market rate

for complex federal litigation. Blum, 465 U.S. at 893 94 (citations omitted).

Adjustments to the lodestar may then be required. Id. at 888 89. Twelve so

called Kerr factors guide these adjustments.1

Some cases refer to “a strong presumption that the lodestar figure represents a

reasonable fee,” and admonish that “[o]nly in rare instances should the lodestar be

adjusted on the basis of other considerations.” Morales v. City of San Rafael, 96 F.3d

359, 364 n.8 (9th Cir. 1997), cited in Suppl. MPA re Fees at 3 4. These statements do

not mean that the various Kerr factors, including the “results obtained,” may only

1 The Kerr factors are: (1) the time and labor required, (2) the novelty anddifficulty of the questions involved, (3) the skill requisite to perform the legal serviceproperly, (4) the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to acceptanceof the case, (5) the customary fee, (6) whether the fee is fixed or contingent, (7) timelimitations imposed by the client or the circumstances, (8) the amount involved andthe results obtained, (9) the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys, (10)the ‘undesirability’ of the case, (11) the nature and length of the professionalrelationship with the client, and (12) awards in similar cases. Kerr v. Screen ExtrasGuild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67, 69 70 (9th Cir. 1975) (citing Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express,Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974)).




10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

rarely be used to adjust the lodestar. Read in context, the statements are admonitions

against double counting. They refer to courts’ frequent practice of taking Kerr factors

into account before the lodestar is calculated, by adjusting the hourly rates or the

number of hours allowed before multiplying. If, in light of a Kerr factor, a court

lowers billing rates or reduces total hours beforemultiplying, it would obviously be

double counting to use that same factor to adjust the lodestar again. In such cases

courts say the Kerr factor is “subsumed” into the lodestar. Morales, 96 F.3d at 363 64

& nn.8 9 (listing “subsumed” Kerr factors and noting the double counting problem).

But that doesn’t mean this court should hesitate before factoring into the lodestar this

motion’s key Kerr factor—the extent of plaintiffs’ success. See id. (noting that “the

results obtained” is a subsumed Kerr factor); Blum, 465 U.S. at 900 (same). On the

contrary, and as noted above, in cases of incomplete relief such factoring may be

required. See Morales, 96 F.3d at 364 (citing Hensley).

In weighing the extent of a plaintiff’s success, courts recognize that the

importance of civil rights victories often cannot be measured in dollars. Hensley, 461

U.S. at 430 n.4; Rivera, 477 U.S. at 574 (“[A] civil rights plaintiff seeks to vindicate

important civil and constitutional rights that cannot be valued solely in monetary

terms.”);McCown, 565 F.3d at 1105 (“excellent results” for fee calculation purposes

includes non monetary outcomes);Morales, 96 F.3d at 365 (“Success is measured not

only by the amount of the recovery but also in terms of the significance of the legal

issue on which the plaintiff prevailed and the public purpose the litigation served.”).

The fee applicant has the burden of establishing entitlement to an award,

including documenting the hours expended and billing judgment about which of

those hours to claim. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 437. “Counsel for the prevailing party

should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are

excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.” Id. at 434. The party opposing the

fee application then has the burden of submitting evidence “challenging the accuracy




11

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

and reasonableness of the hours charged or the facts asserted by the prevailing party

in its submitted affidavits.” Gates v. Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1397 98 (9th Cir. 1993)

(citing Blum, 465 U.S. at 892 n.5).

A district court’s section 1988 fee order must “provide a concise but clear

explanation of its reasons for the fee award.” McCown, 565 F.3d at 1102 (internal

quotation marks omitted) (quoting Hensley, 461 U.S. at 437). The trial court has

discretion over the size of the fee award. 565 F.3d at 1101. The court exceeds its

discretion if it bases its award “on an inaccurate view of the law or a clearly

erroneous finding of fact.” Id. (citation omitted).

III.

This order now turns to the required comparison of “the significance of the

overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours reasonably expended

on the litigation.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435;McCown, 565 F.3d at 1103.

There can be no question that the result here was significant. Plaintiffs note,

and defendants do not contest, that “[t]his is the first ever case in which a state

(California, the most populous state in the nation) was found to be in violation of its

obligation under federal law to provide ‘payments to cover the costs of (and the cost

of providing) food, clothing, shelter,’” and the other benefits enumerated in 42 U.S.C.

§ 675(4)(A). (Suppl. MPA re Fees at 14:7 13.)

As defense counsel conceded at oral argument, the Court’s decision gives

“every parent who’s trying to raise a foster kid hope that they will get more money.”

Given the strong (and uncontroverted) evidence that California’s present rates

steeply lag actual costs, Docket No. 98 at 4, 11:24 28, and that the state did not

previously even investigate actual costs but based its rates solely on budget

considerations, id. at 4:3 15 & n.1, a “hope that [foster parents] will get more money”

would seem well founded. For the first time, the state will set foster care rates using

actual costs.




12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

Plaintiffs also adduced other evidence of benefits. They showed that the

number of California foster parents has been declining, and submitted expert

evidence that the consequent increase in institution based foster care—a more

expensive alternative—has increased the state’s overall foster care costs. (Docket

No. 89 at 12 14.) This suggests that if California’s foster care maintenance rates were

increased, it could have the twin benefits of increasing the proportion of family based

placements relative to institutional placements, and decreasing overall foster care

costs (though defendants’ dispute this latter point). (Id.)

So all parties are agreed that the result here was significant; and the Special

Master so finds.

That, however, does not end the inquiry. The court must consider whether

plaintiffs’ unsuccessful pursuits were a significant enough portion of their overall

efforts to justify a reduction in fees. As noted, the preferred practice is to make any

adjustments to plaintiffs’ hours billed, or hourly rates charged, before they are

combined into the lodestar. E.g., Gates, 987 F.2d at 1404. Defendants concede in their

papers, July 31, 2009 Opp. to Suppl. MPA re Fees at 3, and affirmed at oral argument,

that plaintiffs’ hourly rates are reasonable. Plaintiffs used 2007 and 2008 billing rates

rather than adjusting all hours to current rates, as would have been permitted.

(Compare July 24, 2009 Suppl. Van Voorhis Decl. at 2 ¶ 3 (2007 and 2008 rates used)

with Gates, 987 F.2d at 1406 (current rates permissible).) The Special Master has also

reviewed the rates, and agrees they are reasonable for this market and these

professionals. Accordingly, no adjustments will be made to plaintiffs’ hourly rates.

Adjustments are appropriate only to hours billed.

Further, despite defendants’ contrary stance in their papers, see July 31, 2009

Opp. to Suppl. MPA re Fees at 4:4 14, all parties agreed at oral argument that there

were no “unrelated claims” in this case. Such claims, as noted, are properly

deductible from plaintiffs’ award. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 35;McCown, 565 F.3d




13

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

at 1103. The Special Master agrees there are no such claims here. All of plaintiffs’

requested relief stemmed from deprivations of the same federal right: to receive

foster care maintenance payments set in accordance with the CWA.

At oral argument, defendants also conceded for the first time that their

principal contention for a reduction in fees—that because plaintiffs won one of two

kinds of relief their fees should be cut in half—was not tenable under controlling law.

Asked at argument about the many cases rejecting a crude arithmetic proration,

defendants conceded that, upon closer review, these cases preclude their theory.

Defendants thus withdrew their request to cut plaintiffs’ fees in half. The Special

Master asked whether defendants had an alternative proposed fee deduction.

Defendants conceded they did not. They simply asked that fees be fixed at “the

smallest number that’s fair.”

But a request for the “smallest number that’s fair” does not satisfy defendants’

burden, once plaintiffs have documented their fees, of “submission of evidence to the

district court challenging the accuracy and reasonableness of the hours charged or

the facts asserted by the prevailing party in its submitted affidavits.” Gates, 987 F.2d

at 1397 98. Having thus not met this burden, defendants are not entitled to any

particular reduction of plaintiffs’ award.

This does not, however, end the inquiry. Plaintiffs consistently sought

injunctive relief that they did not obtain. An injunction mandating the state’s

compliance with the CWA, especially if it imposed an immediate jump in rates,

would have been very significant. It follows that the failure to obtain such an

injunction is also significant.

In addition, even apart from the question of mandated rates, plaintiffs clearly

sought at least a general injunction compelling the state to comply with the CWA.

(See, e.g., Docket No. 125 at 5:9 10.) Had such an order issued, plaintiffs would have

enforcement mechanisms not now available to them, such as contempt proceedings.




14

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

The plaintiffs’ results in this case, while substantial, important, and of significant

statewide benefit, were therefore also, at least in part, incomplete.

Plaintiffs advance several arguments for why this should have little or no

impact on fees. First, they assert that their case was based on “a single Section 1983

action,” and that they prevailed on that single claim. (Suppl. MPA re Fees at 9 13.)

Because, they urge, they have prevailed on “100% of the Section 1983 violations (one,

in this case),” id. at 7:8, they are entitled to one hundred percent of their billed hours

(after inefficiency reductions).

This approach is incorrect. Hensley itself involved a single count section 1983

claim. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 427. The Hensley plaintiffs, a group of involuntarily

committed hospital patients, won a single “count” charging the deprivation of their

constitutional right to minimally adequate treatment. Id. Yet the Court required that

the fee award take into account plaintiffs’ failure to establish some of the

constitutionally inadequate treatment they alleged (one of six asserted kinds of

inadequate treatment). Id. at 427 40. This rule makes sense. If the test is plaintiffs’

“degree of success,” then the question is not whether a complaint is styled to include

one or many causes of action. Rather, the question is how the relief sought compares

to the overall result obtained.

Plaintiffs also argue that they were never especially interested in having the

Court order any specific payment rates. They contend their preferred injunctive

relief would have been an order simply requiring the state to follow the CWA.

Defendants contend plaintiffs did seek an order mandating a particular rate

schedule. (E.g., Docket No. 128 at 2; Docket No. 128, “Itemized Addendum,” at 1 2.)

They point to the Court’s summary judgment ruling, where the Court denied

plaintiffs’ motion “insofar as plaintiffs assert that defendants must be in exact

compliance with its particular measure of child welfare maintenance payments.”

(Docket No. 98 at 11:7 8.) Defendants contend plaintiffs spent significant time




15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

developing and advocating specific proposed rates, including through extensive use

of expert witnesses. (Docket No. 128 at 2; Docket No. 128, “Itemized Addendum,” at

1 2; July 31, 2009 Opp. to Supp. MPA re Fees at 3 4.)

Plaintiffs concede that at least part of their requested injunctive relief entailed

a court set interim rate structure (until the state could set its own rates). (Supp. MPA

re Fees at 12 13.) But they contend little time was expended on this effort, which was

meant only as a stop gap. (Id. at 12 13, 23 25.) It is not that plaintiffs deny spending

significant time developing rates for minimally acceptable foster care payments. (Id.

at 17 19, 21.) But they contend this effort undergirded their whole case—not just

their request for an interim imposition of rates. (Id.) According to plaintiffs, a key

part of their litigation strategy was showing the dramatic gap between the state

approved rates and the actual costs of the child maintenance expenses enumerated in

the CWA. As plaintiffs’ counsel put it at oral argument, “You don’t get a court order

if you can’t show a real problem.” To plaintiffs, then, their work developing rates

was essential to all of their case, including the declaratory relief they ultimately won.

Plaintiffs thus argue that if any time is deducted for their failure to convince the

Court to set specific rates, it should only be the tiny amount of time it took to

research and draft the relevant portion of the prayer section of their complaint. (Id. at

23 25.)

The Special Master credits plaintiffs’ explanation that the rate evidence they

developed was central to their case, and not solely (or even principally) for use in

obtaining an order imposing particular rates. Indeed, it is plausible this rate data

contributed directly to the declaratory relief they won. The Court’s summary

judgment ruling cited the size of the gap between current rates and actual costs as

one of three “dispositive distinctions” separating this case from a similar foster care

case in which relief was not granted. (Docket No. 98 at 10 11 (contrasting California

Alliance of Child & Family Serv. v. Allenby, 2008 WL 686860 (N.D. Cal. March 12,




16

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

2008)).) It is also true, as plaintiffs note, that they told the Court in their summary

judgment papers that it was not necessary that the state closely follow any particular

measure of costs. (Suppl. MPA re Fees at 13 (quoting Docket No. 87 at 8 n.11).)

Yet there is also evidence that plaintiffs did, at least in part, gather and present

their cost evidence in order to get an injunction imposing a specific rate schedule.

The complaint requested, among other things, an injunction requiring the state to

implement a payment system for the enumerated CWA expenses “in an amount

subject to proof.” (Docket No. 1 at 14 (emphasis added).)

The plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion also contained the requests for

injunctive relief excerpted at page 5, supra, which clearly entail the Court’s

imposition of rates on the state, directly or through power of approval. (Docket

No. 89 at 18.) At least a portion of plaintiffs’ rate development work was thus meant

to enable the Court to impose, to approve, or to supervise specific foster care

maintenance rates.

To account for this, the Special Master will deduct a portion of the hours

plaintiffs spent gathering actual cost data. As noted, the Special Master credits

plaintiffs’ statements that the cost data served to support plaintiffs’ case generally.

Because this cost data preparation also supported plaintiffs’ (unsuccessful) efforts to

enable the Court to take more specific control of the rate setting process, the Special

Master will deduct one half of the hours spent on these projects.

Determining which hours were spent on such projects is necessarily an inexact

undertaking. The available time records do not permit a precise review. Even if they

did, the number calculated would not measure the precise utility to the case of

developing this data. This process is an inexact but reasonable proxy for measuring

the value of plaintiffs’ effort to have the Court take control of foster care rates. The

approach will also serve as a proxy for plaintiffs’ failure to obtain injunctive relief

generally (whether or not setting rates). Cf. Hensley, 461 U.S. at 436 37 (“There is no




17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

precise rule or formula for making these determinations. The district court may

attempt to identify specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce

the award to account for the limited success. The court necessarily has discretion in

making this equitable judgment.”); cf. Gates, 987 F.2d at 1399 1400.

The need for proxy determinations also arises from each side’s failure to

propose a method for arriving at a discount. Defendants, as noted, abandoned their

suggestion that fees be cut in half, but offered no basis for a reduction in its stead.

Plaintiffs likewise declined to offer any method or measure of reduced fees, in the

event the Special Master determined their incomplete success required one.

Accordingly, the Special Master used the following criteria to cull billing

entries for gathering cost data. First, he included all entries concerning either of

plaintiffs’ experts Jill Duerr Berrick or Diane Depanfilis. These experts prepared

reports on actual foster care costs. (One or two such entries were excluded because

the time involving the experts appeared negligible.) Next, in the project entitled

“Prepare Expert Reports,” all time entries principally dealing with economics expert

Phil Johnson, or principally dealing with the economics issues he covered, were

excluded. Dr. Johnson’s report dealt not with developing actual foster care costs, but

with projecting the fiscal consequences to the state of increasing foster care

payments. Next, all time entries within “Prepare Expert Reports” generically

referring to preparing expert reports, without identifying which ones, were included.

Finally, time entries under any project that specifically referenced work ascertainable

as dealing with gathering cost data were included. A record of each time entry

selected for inclusion under these criteria is attached to this decision as Appendix A.

The total dollar value of all included time entries is $64,251.25. Half of this

sum is $32,125.63.

Further, the Special Master approves plaintiffs’ voluntary inefficiency

reductions. Plaintiffs originally agreed to write downs of $77,356.50. (Docket No.




18

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

127 at 5.) Defendants then objected to billings for travel time, and for a project

entitled “Perform Administrative Tasks.” (Docket No. 128, “Itemized Addendum,”

at 2 3, 10.) In response, plaintiffs agreed to write down an additional $57,084.50.

(July 24, 2009 Supp. Van Voorhis Decl. at 8.) Most of this reduction came from

written off travel time and the elimination of billing for multiple attorneys at

hearings and depositions. (Id.) In addition, in response to defendants’ complaint

about the “Perform Administrative Tasks” project, plaintiffs capped all billing rates

within that project at the rate of a senior paralegal. (Id. at 7.) In combination, all of

these reductions total $134,441, or 12.3% of plaintiffs’ original request. The Special

Master finds these reductions sufficient to account for billing inefficiencies.

* * * * * *

Plaintiffs’ amended fee request of $958,922.75will be reduced by $32,125.63,

for the reasons discussed above.

Plaintiffs’ are hereby awarded fees in the amount of $926,797.12.

Plaintiffs shall determine how these fees are apportioned among co counsel,

and inform defendants of payee(s) and amount(s).

Costs are $3,372.22. Fees on fees have been waived.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 8, 2009 By: __ __/s/ Marc N. Bernstein____Marc N. Bernstein



In combination, all of

these reductions total $134,441, or 12.3% of plaintiffs’ original request. The Special

Master finds these reductions sufficient to account for billing inefficiencies.

* * * * * *

Plaintiffs’ amended fee request of $958,922.75will be reduced by $32,125.63,

for the reasons discussed above.

Plaintiffs’ are hereby awarded fees in the amount of $926,797.12.


APPENDIX A



pa-1318204 1

California State Foster Parent Association v. Wagner Case No. C 07-05086 WHA

Exhibit C

Project: Perform Expert Research and engagement Date Timekeeper Description Hours x Rate = Fee

9/5/2007 RCF Meeting re status and facts and experts needed 1.00 650 $650.00

10/19/2007 DT Research on potential expert witnesses. 2.00 425 $850.00

10/25/2007 DT Research on expert witnesses. 1.00 425 $425.00 10/25/2007 DT Research on expert witnesses. 1.50 425 $637.50 10/29/2007 DT Research on expert witnesses. 2.50 425 $1,062.50 10/30/2007 DT Research on expert witnesses. 2.25 425 $956.25 11/1/2007 DT Conduct expert search 2.50 425 $1,062.50 11/2/2007 DT Conduct expert search 3.25 425 $1,381.25

11/3/2007 DT Conduct expert search; review materials sent from J. Buerrick. 1.25 425 $531.25

11/5/2007 DT Correspond with potential expert J. Buerrick; conduct expert search

1.50 425 $637.50

11/6/2007 DT Conduct expert search. 2.00 425 $850.00

11/6/2007 KVV Review potential expert qualifications. 0.50 555 $277.50

11/6/2007 KVV Review potential expert qualifications. 0.25 555 $138.75

11/7/2007 KVV Analysis regarding potential experts. 0.50 555 $277.50

11/7/2007 DT Conduct expert search; distribute materials to team. 0.75 425 $318.75

11/7/2007 MTS Gather documents for Attorney Van Voorhis. 1.00 200 $200.00

11/8/2007 KVV Analysis regarding experts. 0.50 555 $277.50

11/9/2007 DT

Conduct expert search; correspond with J. Farber of Children’s Rights; review Mississippi settlement.

1.00 425 $425.00

11/12/2007 DT Correspond with J. Farber 0.25 425 $106.25

11/15/2007 DT Arrange meeting with J. Farber and I. Lustbader. 0.50 425 $212.50

11/15/2007 KVV Attention to experts 0.50 555 $277.50

11/16/2007 DT Arrange meeting with J. Farber and I. Lustbader. 0.50 425 $212.50

11/20/2007 DT Prepare and send engagement 0.75 425 $318.75

Exhibit C

Case3:07-cv-05086-WHA Document127-3 Filed02/17/09 Page1 of 101Case3:07-cv-05086-WHA Document142 Filed11/08/09 Page20 of 26Case 1:13-cv-00663-LEK-KSC Document 348-12 Filed 03/28/17 Page 20 of 26 PageID #: 10352


pa-1318204 2

letter to J. Buerrick; correspond with I. Lustbader.

1/4/2008 DT Contact D. DePanfilis and J. Berrick regarding status of case. 0.50 520 $260.00

1/22/2008 DT Review chart of disclosure documents; prepare e-mail to J. Berrick.

2.00 520 $1,040.00

1/30/2008 DT

Call expert J. Berrick regarding documents to collect and review; prepare e-mail regarding same; review book chapter and related articles sent by expert.

2.00 520 $1,040.00

2/19/2008 CMR Strategy calls for background on potential witness - Greg Lim 1.75 500 $875.00

2/20/2008 RCF Phone conf & emails re Lim 0.50 650 $325.00 2/20/2008 RCF Phone conf & emails re Lim 0.50 650 $325.00

2/21/2008 CMR Strategize with team re Greg Lim 0.25 500 $125.00

2/21/2008 CMR Strategize with team re Greg Lim 0.25 500 $125.00

2/27/2008 CMR Work on engagement of Greg Lim 0.50 500 $250.00

2/28/2008 RCF Phone conf w/ Jean Ross re her testimony; draft of possible declaration

1.25 650 $812.50

6/27/2008 DT Confer with P. Johnson regarding role as economics expert on case.

0.50 520 $260.00

7/11/2008 SDK Correspond with team regarding pro bono economist. 0.25 350 $87.50

8/25/2008 RCF Review of documents from experts, economics study 2.25 650 $1,462.50

Project Total: 40.25 $19,073.75

Project: Greg Lim Expert Interview (2 Days in Sacramento) Date Timekeeper Description Hours x Rate = Fee

2/25/2008 CMR Call w/Greg Lim - interview as potential witness 1.25 500 $625.00

Exhibit C



pa-1318204 4

Project Total: 39.5 $20,481.25

Project: Prepare Expert Reports Date Timekeeper Description Hours x Rate = Fee

5/16/2008 KVV Review case materials, outlines and expert disclosures. 2.25 605 $1,361.25

5/22/2008 DT Call J. Berrick and leave message; call D. Depanfilis and leave message.

0.25 520 $130.00

5/23/2008 DT Call J. Berrick to update on status of case; call D. Depanfilis and leave message.

0.75 520 $390.00

5/30/2008 DT Call D. Depanfilis and leave message. 0.25 520 $130.00

6/17/2008 DT Review materials regarding expert reports. 2.00 520 $1,040.00

6/19/2008 DT Prepare Berrick expert report. 1.50 520 $780.00

6/20/2008 DT

Prepare Berrick expert report; confer with K. Van Voorhis regarding same; confer with J. Berrick regarding same.

3.25 520 $1,690.00

6/23/2008 DT Prepare expert reports; prepare for meeting with J. Berrick. 3.00 520 $1,560.00

6/25/2008 DT

Meet with expert J. Berrick; call expert P. Johnson to discuss engagement; prepare expert reports.

7.00 520 $3,640.00

6/26/2008 DT Prepare expert reports. 6.00 520 $3,120.00

6/27/2008 DT

Confer with J. Berrick regarding expert report; research article for citations to expert report; draft report; edit proposed stipulation.

4.00 520 $2,080.00


Exhibit C



pa-1318204 5

7/2/2008 DT

Prepare expert report of J. Berrick; meet with J. Berrick regarding same; review Defendants' answer; confer with P. Johnson regarding engagement; prepare expert report of D. Depanfilis.

5.25 520 $2,730.00

7/9/2008 DT Prepare expert reports. 1.25 520 $650.00

7/11/2008 CMR Prepare outline of what will be needed for economist report 1.25 500 $625.00

7/12/2008 RCF Review of economic scenarios for our expert 1.50 650 $975.00

7/16/2008 DT Confer with J. Berrick regarding report; revise draft expert report. 1.00 520 $520.00

7/16/2008 DT

Confer with P. Johnson regarding expert report; e-mail correspondence with B. Fellmuth and C. Riehl regarding economics expert report.

1.50 520 $780.00

7/17/2008 CMR Memo & related research for econ expert re scenarios to run 3.50 500 $1,750.00


7/22/2008 DT Prepare expert report. 1.50 520 $780.00

7/28/2008 DT Prepare expert report. 1.50 520 $780.00

7/28/2008 KVV Follow-up regarding experts. .50 605 $302.50

7/29/2008 DT Prepare expert report; review and prepare scenarios for economics expert to consider.

4.00 520 $2,080.00

7/29/2008 CMR Call w/economics expert and follow-up research needed. 2.50 500 $1,250.00

7/30/2008 DT Attend conference call with C. Riehl and P. Johnson; prepare expert reports.

1.75 520 $910.00

7/30/2008 CMR Call w/econ expert & Dara - follow-up research. 1.50 500 $750.00

7/31/2008 DT Prepare expert reports; confer with P. Johnson regarding expert

7.00 520 $3,640.00

Exhibit C



pa-1318204 6

report.



8/4/2008 KVV Review and revise expert report. 5.25 605 $3,176.25


8/5/2008 KVV Revise expert reports. 1.50 605 $907.50


8/6/2008 KVV Review expert reports. 1.50 605 $907.50

8/7/2008 DT Prepare expert reports. 1.50 520 $780.00


8/8/2008 SDK Review and analyze draft expert reports and declarations. 0.25 350 $87.50


8/12/2008 DT Prepare and serve expert reports. 9.00 520 $4,680.00

8/12/2008 KVV Work on expert reports and declaration. 3.25 605 $1,966.25

8/12/2008 MDP Analyze expert reports. 1.50 600 $900.00

8/18/2008 CMR Review and analyze DePanfilis Report 0.75 500 $375.00

8/26/2008 CMR Review emails produced by State & Confer w/Dara 2.00 500 $1,000.00

8/27/2008 DT Confer with C. Riehl regarding review of e-mails; review e-mails.

1.50 520 $780.00

Project Total: 134.5 $69,832.50

Project: Prepare Witness Research Date Timekeeper Description Hours x Rate = Fee

9/7/2007 CMR BF & CR call w/LAPP re their role as Plaintiff 0.75 500 $375.00

Exhibit C



pa-1318204 43

conference.

1/22/2008 KVV Prepare filing regarding budget decreases. 0.50 605 $302.50

3/4/2008 CMR Drafting and research re evidence that will be needed for SJ.

1.25 500 $625.00

3/12/2008 EH Review Patel order in Alliance case 0.50 550 $275.00

3/12/2008 CMR Review & analyze SJ Order in Alliance case 0.75 500 $375.00

3/12/2008 RCF Review of documents from CR & others, notes; draft suggestions for SJ

2.25 650 $1,462.50

3/13/2008 CMR Drafting and research re evidence that will be needed for SJ.

0.75 500 $375.00

3/24/2008 RCF Conf call w/ team re: SJ, documents discussed 1.00 650 $650.00

4/15/2008 RCF Research re SJ documents re CNI vs other measures, note re MD study

1.25 650 $812.50

4/25/2008 CMR Update memo re evidence that will be needed for SJ. 0.50 500 $250.00

5/27/2008 EH Review B.Fellmeth draft of Jean Ross declaration and draft extensive edits re same

0.50 550 $275.00

6/2/2008 EH Review B Fellmeth draft outline for MSJ 0.25 550 $137.50

6/2/2008 EH Review and redraft Ross declaration; research re same 1.00 550 $550.00

6/3/2008 CMR Draft outline for SJ Motion 2.50 500 $1,250.00

6/3/2008 DT

Review draft Ross declaration; call D. Depanfilis; review draft summary judgment motion chart.

1.00 520 $520.00

6/3/2008 KVV Analysis regarding case strategy. 0.50 605 $302.50

6/3/2008 EH Review and suggest edits to Ross draft declaration 0.50 550 $275.00

6/4/2008 CMR Update outline for SJ Motion 0.75 500 $375.00 6/4/2008 DT Review Wagner declaration;

review summary judgment chart 1.50 520 $780.00

Exhibit C



pa-1318204 76

8/3/2008 MDP Analyze DSS legislative analyses. 0.50 600 $300.00

8/3/2008 SDK

Review and analyze DSS analyses of proposed legislation to increase foster care reimbursement rates.

0.75 350 $262.50

8/4/2008 RSB Review case materials, papers, and background. 1.25 520 $650.00

8/4/2008 SDK

Review and analyze six new DSS documents and strategize regarding use for summary judgment; review and analyze CWS Redesign document.

2.50 350 $875.00

8/5/2008 RSB Read background materials. 2.00 520 $1,040.00

8/15/2008 NH

Research and review proceedings of program on national public radio relating to foster care rates.

1.00 170 $170.00

8/15/2008 CMR Research data re what increase is needed. 4.25 500 $2,125.00

8/17/2008 RCF Conf call w/ EH re status, strategy 0.50 650 $325.00

8/18/2008 DT Review e-mails produced by State. 2.00 520 $1,040.00

8/18/2008 RSB Research availability of injunctive relief. 6.50 520 $3,380.00

8/20/2008 CMR Research re GH rate changes 0.75 500 $375.00

8/27/2008 CMR Child care costs & avg. distance of child's placement from home. - confer with Rick

2.25 500 $1,125.00

8/29/2008 CMR Research case law re weekly visitation 2.50 500 $1,250.00

9/9/2008 CMR Follow-up w/Steve re: Natasha Frost's info 0.25 500 $125.00

9/10/2008 EH Call w/CR re LAPP 0.25 550 $137.50

9/13/2008 SDK Search for amendments to 2002 State Plan for Title IV-E eligibility.

0.50 350 $175.00

Exhibit C



Plaintiffs Notice of Unopposed Motion and Unopposed Motion For Award and Approval of Settlement Regarding Attorneys Fees and Service Awards; Declaration of Paul Alston; Declaration of Claire Wong Black; Declaration ofGavin Thornton; Declaration of James Hancock; Exhibits A G; Certificate of Service




PATRICIA SHEEHEY, PATRICK SHEEHEY, RAYNETTE AH CHONG, individually and on behalf of the class of licensed foster care providers residing in the State of Hawai`i,

Plaintiffs,vs.


Defendant.

Case No. CV13-00663 LEK-KSC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was

served electronically on the following via CM/ECF on March 30, 2018:

Deputy Attorney General Donna H. Kalama [email protected] for Defendant

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, March 30, 2018.

/s/ Claire Wong BlackPAUL ALSTONJ. BLAINE ROGERSCLAIRE WONG BLACKVICTOR GEMINIANI GAVIN THORNTONMARC D. PETERSALESSA Y. HWANGJAMES R. HANCOCK

Class Counsel


case 1:13-cv-00663-lek-ksc document 390 filed 03/30/18

Documents