case study kromhout barracks
DESCRIPTION
Case study Kromhout Barracks. Maarten Groothuis. The Kromhout Barracks challenge. Army Command Headquarters and other MoD units Location Utrecht Offices for 2000 employees (+ option for extra 1000) 90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc. Services: maintenance, - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Case studyCase studyKromhout BarracksKromhout Barracks
Maarten GroothuisMaarten Groothuis
The Kromhout Barracks The Kromhout Barracks challengechallenge• Army Command Headquarters and other MoD Army Command Headquarters and other MoD
unitsunits• Location UtrechtLocation Utrecht• Offices for 2000 employeesOffices for 2000 employees
(+ option for extra 1000)(+ option for extra 1000)• 90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc.90 hotel rooms, sport facilities, etc.• Services: maintenance,Services: maintenance, catering, security, facilitycatering, security, facility management, etc.management, etc.
Ambitions for the projectAmbitions for the project•MoD wants to focus on its core tasksMoD wants to focus on its core tasks
•Benefiting contractor’s specialised Benefiting contractor’s specialised knowledge and experienceknowledge and experience
•Higher quality (“one stopHigher quality (“one stop shopping”), lower costsshopping”), lower costs
ApproachApproach•Pilot project for PPP in DefencePilot project for PPP in Defence•DBFMO for 25 yearsDBFMO for 25 years•European tender procedure:European tender procedure:
– Competitive dialogueCompetitive dialogue– Maximum bid priceMaximum bid price– Economically most advantageous Economically most advantageous
tender (EMAT)tender (EMAT)•Financial scopeFinancial scope
– DCF 335 million €DCF 335 million €– PPP savings exceed 15%PPP savings exceed 15%
•MoD is and will be ownerMoD is and will be owner•Performance-related availability feePerformance-related availability fee
ProcessProcessPreparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Procurement guidelines
Public Sector Comparator
DBFMO Contract
Output Specification
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
ProcessProcess
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
Phase 1 (5 participants)
Phase 2 (3 participants)
Phase 3 (3 participants)
2007
ProcessProcess
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
2007
ProcessProcess
Final bid: 11 January 2008Preferred bidder: 2 April
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
2007
Summer 2008
ProcessProcess
Final bid: 11 January 2008Preferred bidder: 2 April
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
2007
Summer 2008
2008 - 2010
ProcessProcess
Final bid: 11 January 2008Preferred bidder: 2 April
Preparations
Selection
Dialogue
Final tender
Contract close
Building
Operation
Winter 2005 - Summer 2006
Autumn 2006
2007
Final bid: 11 January 2008Preferred bidder: 2 April
Summer 2008
2008 - 2010
2010 - 2035
ProcessProcess
1212
Preferred bidder ‘Komfort’Preferred bidder ‘Komfort’'AMB Kromhout''AMB Kromhout' (Macquarie Bank, BAM, Arcadis, (Macquarie Bank, BAM, Arcadis,
GTI, Unica and Kraaijvanger Urbis)GTI, Unica and Kraaijvanger Urbis)
'Integra Partners Kromhout''Integra Partners Kromhout' (Heijmans, NIBC (Heijmans, NIBC Infrastructure, Burgers Ergon, Facilicom, Infrastructure, Burgers Ergon, Facilicom, Quadrat and Broekbakema)Quadrat and Broekbakema)
'Komfort''Komfort' (Ballast Nedam, Strukton and John (Ballast Nedam, Strukton and John Laing, in cooperation with Meyer en Van Laing, in cooperation with Meyer en Van Schooten Architecten, Karres en Brands Schooten Architecten, Karres en Brands Landschapsarchitecten and ISS Nederland BV.Landschapsarchitecten and ISS Nederland BV.
1313
DesignDesign
1414
ImpressionImpression
Case study: stakeholder Case study: stakeholder analysisanalysisStakeholderStakeholder Current Current
positionpositionInterestsInterests Desired Desired
level of level of engagemeengagementnt
Defense procurement Defense procurement organizationorganization
PPP may not PPP may not undermine our undermine our large scale large scale procurement procurement contractscontracts
Municipality of UtrechtMunicipality of Utrecht Use as less ground Use as less ground space as possible. space as possible. Surplus to be used Surplus to be used for new build for new build homes and/or homes and/or offices.offices.
NeighboursNeighbours Maintain green Maintain green environment, in environment, in future to be future to be crossed by a cycle crossed by a cycle pathpath
Works councilWorks council Keep support Keep support services inside the services inside the Defense Defense organizationorganization
Questions?Questions?