causes and coincidences tom griffiths cognitive and linguistic sciences brown university
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Causes and coincidences
Tom GriffithsCognitive and Linguistic Sciences
Brown University
![Page 2: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“It could be that, collectively, the people in New York caused those lottery numbers to come up 9-1-1… If enough people all are thinking the same thing, at the same time, they can cause events to happen… It's called psychokinesis.”
![Page 5: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
![Page 6: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
(Halley, 1752)
76 y
ears
75 y
ears
![Page 7: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The paradox of coincidences
How can coincidences simultaneously lead us toirrational conclusions and significant discoveries?
![Page 8: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Outline
1. A Bayesian approach to causal induction
2. Coincidencesi. what makes a coincidence?
ii. rationality and irrationality
iii. the paradox of coincidences
3. Explaining inductive leaps
![Page 9: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Outline
1. A Bayesian approach to causal induction
2. Coincidencesi. what makes a coincidence?
ii. rationality and irrationality
iii. the paradox of coincidences
3. Explaining inductive leaps
![Page 10: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Causal induction
• Inferring causal structure from data
• A task we perform every day … – does caffeine increase productivity?
• … and throughout science– three comets or one?
![Page 11: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Reverend Thomas Bayes
![Page 12: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Bayes’ theorem
∑∈′
′′=
Hh
hphdp
hphdpdhp
)()|(
)()|()|(
Posteriorprobability
Likelihood Priorprobability
Sum over space of hypothesesh: hypothesis
d: data
![Page 13: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Bayesian causal induction
Hypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors:
Data:
causal structures
![Page 14: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Causal graphical models(Pearl, 2000; Spirtes et al., 1993)
• Variables
X Y
Z
![Page 15: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Variables
• Structure
X Y
Z
Causal graphical models(Pearl, 2000; Spirtes et al., 1993)
![Page 16: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
X Y
Z
• Variables
• Structure
• Conditional probabilities
p(z|x,y)
p(x) p(y)
Defines probability distribution over variables(for both observation, and intervention)
Causal graphical models(Pearl, 2000; Spirtes et al., 1993)
![Page 17: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Bayesian causal induction
Hypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors:
probability distribution over variables
Data: observations of variables
causal structures
a priori plausibility of structures
![Page 18: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
“Does C cause E?”(rate on a scale from 0 to 100)
E present (e+)
E absent (e-)
C present(c+)
C absent(c-)
a
b
c
d
Causal induction from contingencies
![Page 19: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Buehner & Cheng (1997)
“Does the chemical cause gene expression?”(rate on a scale from 0 to 100)
E present (e+)
E absent (e-)
C present(c+)
C absent(c-)
6
2
4
4Gen
e
Chemical
![Page 20: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
People
Examined human judgments for all values of P(e+|c+) and P(e+|c-) in increments of 0.25
How can we explain these judgments?
Buehner & Cheng (1997)C
ausa
l rat
ing
![Page 21: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chance
E
B C
E
B CB B
Hypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors:
each cause has an independent opportunity to produce the effect
p 1 - p
Data: frequency of cause-effect co-occurrence
![Page 22: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chance
E
B C
E
B CB B
Hypotheses:
€
p(cause | d) =p(d | cause) p(cause)
p(d | cause) p(cause) + p(d | chance) p(chance)
![Page 23: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chance
E
B C
E
B CB B
Hypotheses:
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
evidence for a causal relationship
![Page 24: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
People
Bayes (r = 0.97)
Buehner and Cheng (1997)
![Page 25: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
People
Bayes (r = 0.97)
Buehner and Cheng (1997)
P (r = 0.89)
Power (r = 0.88)
![Page 26: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Other predictions
• Causal induction from contingency data– sample size effects– judgments for incomplete contingency tables
(Griffiths & Tenenbaum, in press)
• More complex cases– detectors (Tenenbaum & Griffiths, 2003)
– explosions (Griffiths, Baraff, & Tenenbaum, 2004)
– simple mechanical devices
![Page 27: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
A B
The stick-ball machine
(Kushnir, Schulz, Gopnik, & Danks, 2003)
![Page 28: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
![Page 29: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Outline
1. A Bayesian approach to causal induction
2. Coincidencesi. what makes a coincidence?
ii. rationality and irrationality
iii. the paradox of coincidences
3. Explaining inductive leaps
![Page 30: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What makes a coincidence?
![Page 31: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
A common definition: Coincidences are unlikely events
“an event which seems so unlikely that it is worth telling a story about”
“we sense that it is too unlikely to have been the result of luck or mere chance”
![Page 32: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Coincidences are not just unlikely...
HHHHHHHHHHvs.
HHTHTHTTHT
![Page 33: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Bayesian causal induction
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
Likelihood ratio(evidence)
Prior odds
high
low
highlow
cause
chance
?
?
![Page 34: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Bayesian causal induction
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
Likelihood ratio(evidence)
Prior odds
high
low
highlow
cause
chance
coincidence
?
![Page 35: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
What makes a coincidence?
A coincidence is an event that provides evidence for causal structure, but not enough evidence to make us believe that structure exists
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
![Page 36: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
What makes a coincidence?
A coincidence is an event that provides evidence for causal structure, but not enough evidence to make us believe that structure exists
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
likelihood ratiois high
![Page 37: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
What makes a coincidence?
A coincidence is an event that provides evidence for causal structure, but not enough evidence to make us believe that structure exists
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
likelihood ratiois high
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare middling
![Page 38: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
HHHHHHHHHH
HHTHTHTTHT
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
likelihood ratiois high
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare middling
![Page 39: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chance
E
C
Hypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors: p 1 - p
Data: frequency of effect in presence of cause
E
C
(small)
0 < p(E) < 1 p(E) = 0.5
![Page 40: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
HHHHHHHHHH
HHTHTHTTHT
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
likelihood ratiois high
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare middling
likelihood ratiois low
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare low
coincidence
chance
![Page 41: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
HHHHHHHHHH
HHHHlikelihood ratio
is middlingprior odds
are lowposterior odds
are low
mere coincidence
likelihood ratiois high
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare middling
suspicious coincidence
likelihood ratiois very high
prior oddsare low
posterior oddsare high
cause
![Page 42: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Mere and suspicious coincidences
mere coincidence
suspiciouscoincidence
evidence for acausal relation
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)
• Transition produced by– increase in likelihood ratio (e.g., coinflipping)– increase in prior odds (e.g., genetics vs. ESP)
![Page 43: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Testing the definition
• Provide participants with data from experiments
• Manipulate:– cover story: genetic engineering vs. ESP (prior)– data: number of males/heads (likelihood)– task: “coincidence or evidence?” vs. “how likely?”
• Predictions:– coincidences affected by prior and likelihood– relationship between coincidence and posterior
![Page 44: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
47 51 55 59 63 70 87 99
r = -0.98
47 51 55 59 63 70 87 99
Number of heads/males
Prop
orti
on “
coin
cide
nce”
Post
erio
r pr
obab
ilit
y
![Page 45: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
Likelihood ratio(evidence)
Prior odds
high
low
highlow
cause
chance
coincidence
?
Rationality and irrationality
![Page 46: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
(Gilovich, 1991)
The bombing of London
![Page 47: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
![Page 48: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
(uniform)
Spread
Location
Ratio
Number
Change in... People
![Page 49: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chanceHypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors: p 1 - p
uniformuniform
+regularity
T
X X XX
TT TT
X X XX
T
Data: bomb locations
![Page 50: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
r = 0.98
(uniform)
Spread
Location
Ratio
Number
Change in... People Bayes
![Page 51: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
May 14, July 8, August 21, December 25
vs.
August 3, August 3, August 3, August 3
Coincidences in date
![Page 52: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
People
![Page 53: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Bayesian causal inductioncause chanceHypotheses:
Likelihoods:
Priors: p 1 - p
uniformuniform + regularity
P P PPP P PP
B B B
August
Data: birthdays of those present
![Page 54: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
People Bayes
![Page 55: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
• People’s sense of the strength of coincidences gives a close match to the likelihood ratio– bombing and birthdays
Rationality and irrationality
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
![Page 56: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
• People’s sense of the strength of coincidences gives a close match to the likelihood ratio– bombing and birthdays
• Suggests that we accept false conclusions when our prior odds are insufficiently low
Rationality and irrationality
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
![Page 57: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Rationality and irrationality
Likelihood ratio(evidence)
Prior odds
high
low
highlow
cause
chance
coincidence
?
![Page 58: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
The paradox of coincidences
Prior odds can be low for two reasons
Incorrect current theory Significant discovery
Correct current theory False conclusion
Reason Consequence
Attending to coincidences makes more sense the less you know
![Page 59: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Coincidences
• Provide evidence for causal structure, but not enough to make us believe that structure exists
• Intimately related to causal induction– an opportunity to discover a theory is wrong
• Guided by a well calibrated sense of when an event provides evidence of causal structure
![Page 60: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Outline
1. A Bayesian approach to causal induction
2. Coincidencesi. what makes a coincidence?
ii. rationality and irrationality
iii. the paradox of coincidences
3. Explaining inductive leaps
![Page 61: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Explaining inductive leaps
• How do people – infer causal relationships– identify the work of chance– predict the future– assess similarity and make generalizations– learn functions, languages, and concepts
. . . from such limited data?
• What knowledge guides human inferences?
![Page 62: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Which sequence seems more random?
HHHHHHHHHHvs.
HHTHTHTTHT
![Page 63: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Subjective randomness
• Typically evaluated in terms of p(d | chance)
• Assessing randomness is part of causal induction
€
p(chance | d)
p(cause | d)=
p(d | chance)
p(d | cause)
p(chance)
p(cause)evidence for a random
generating process
![Page 64: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Randomness and coincidences
€
p(chance | d)
p(cause | d)=
p(d | chance)
p(d | cause)
p(chance)
p(cause)evidence for a random
generating process
€
p(cause | d)
p(chance | d)=
p(d | cause)
p(d | chance)
p(cause)
p(chance)
strength of coincidence
![Page 65: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Randomness and coincidencesBombing
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 2 4 6 8 10
How big a coincidence?
How random?
Birthdays
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 2 4 6 8 10
How big a coincidence?
How random?
r = -0.96 r = -0.94
![Page 66: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
People
Bayes
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Pick a random number…
![Page 67: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Bayes’ theorem
∑∈′
′′=
Hh
hphdp
hphdpdhp
)()|(
)()|()|(
![Page 68: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Bayes’ theorem
inference = f(data,knowledge)
![Page 69: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Bayes’ theorem
inference = f(data,knowledge)
![Page 70: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Predicting the future
Human predictions match optimal predictions from empirical prior
![Page 71: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Iterated learning(Briscoe, 1998; Kirby, 2001)
data hypothesislea
rning
prod
uctio
n
data hypothesislea
rning
prod
uctio
n
d0 h1 d1 h2inf
erenc
e
sampli
ng
infere
nce
sampli
ng
p(h|d) p(d|h) p(d|h)p(h|d)
(Griffiths & Kalish, submitted)
![Page 72: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Iteration
![Page 73: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Conclusion
• Many cognitive judgments are the result of challenging problems of induction
• Bayesian statistics provides a formal framework for exploring how people solve these problems
• Makes it possible to ask…– how do we make surprising discoveries?– how do we learn so much from so little?– what knowledge guides our judgments?
![Page 74: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Collaborators
• Causal induction– Josh Tenenbaum (MIT)– Liz Baraff (MIT)
• Iterated learning– Mike Kalish (University of Louisiana)
![Page 75: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
![Page 76: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Causes and coincidences
“coincidence” appears in 13/60 cases
p(“cause”) = 0.01
p(“cause”|“coincidence”) = 0.26
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
![Page 77: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
![Page 78: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
A reformulation: unlikely kinds
• Coincidences are events of an unlikely kind– e.g. a sequence with that number of heads
• Deals with the obvious problem...
p(10 heads) < p(5 heads, 5 tails)
![Page 79: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Problems with unlikely kinds
• Defining kinds
August 3, August 3, August 3, August 3
January 12, March 22, March 22, July 19, October 1, December 8
![Page 80: Causes and coincidences Tom Griffiths Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences Brown University](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022032703/56649d0a5503460f949dd5da/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Problems with unlikely kinds
• Defining kinds
• Counterexamples
P(4 heads) < P(2 heads, 2 tails)
P(4 heads) > P(15 heads, 8 tails)
HHHH > HHHHTHTTHHHTHTHHTHTTHHH
HHHH > HHTT