cctld/icann contract for services (draft agreements) a comparison
DESCRIPTION
ccTLD/ICANN Contract for Services (Draft Agreements) A Comparison. Scope of Presentation. Objective Introduction History ICANN ICANN version ccTLD version ICANN version ccTLD version Comparison Issues Way Forward. Introduction. History from ICANN Initiative. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2
Scope of Presentation Objective Introduction
History ICANN ICANN version ccTLD version
ICANN version ccTLD version Comparison Issues Way Forward
3
History from ICANN Initiative ICANN presentation on ICANN and Country
Code Top Level Domain Registries (ICANN version) History
Cairo meeting Mar 2000 Status quo draft Jul 2000
( for discussion purposes only) Presented in Hawaii 1 Feb 2001 and Geneva
19 Feb 2001 No draft agreement comes out yet
Introduction
4
History from ccTLD Initiative Contract for Services between ccTLD
managers and ICANN (ccTLD version) 13 Nov 2000, reviewed and amended
at ccTLD meeting draft agreement ready and being review
Based on CENTR’s 7th draft, 20 Sept 2000 CENTR’s Principles for a Contract for Services
between ICANN and ccTLDs - 29 Oct 1999
Introduction
6
Basic ICANN/ccTLD Agreement Structure
Written agreement between ICANN and ccTLD manager
Assist ccTLD manager in serving needs of local Internet community
Provide for appropriate monitoring of ccTLD manager's trust obligations
Enable ICANN to ensure global DNS interests are protected (technical stability, transparency in registration, etc.)
ICANN version
7
Special Concerns to Be Addressed in ICANN-ccTLD Agreements
Appropriate application of local and global policies
Circumstances in which delegations* are changed
ICANN's performance of the IANA function Contributions to funding ICANN activities
* appointment of alternative ccTLD manager
ICANN version
8
ccTLD AgreementsTwo Basic Situations
(1) Legacy situation: The IANA monitors the trust locally and globally
No government involvement(2) Trilateral situation: The national government, where interested, responsibly monitors the local interest; ICANN monitors the global interest
Legacy TrilateralIntermediate
ICANN version
9
Legacy Situation
Situation (1): Does the national government want to be involved?
If no --> legacy situation --> Agreement between ICANN and ccTLD manager
ICANN version
10
Legacy Situation - ICANN & ccTLD
Manager Responsibilities Commitment to operate ccTLD in trust for the
interest of the Local Internet Community Acknowledgement that no property rights are
acquired in the ccTLD Compliance with ICANN-developed policies
concerning domain-name-dispute resolution (to the extent applicable)
Where the ccTLD registration policies encourage or allow out-of-country registrations, agreement to observe all applicable ICANN-developed policies
Mechanism for conversion to trilateral situation in the event the national government agrees to the necessary items
ICANN version
11
Trilateral Situation Situation (2): If the national government wants
to be involved, is it willing to agree:a) To afford the ccTLD operator security from arbitrary governmental action, with reference to reasonable stated performance requirementsb) To responsibly monitor the ccTLD operator's activities in the interest of the Local Internet Communityc) To acknowledge ICANN's responsibility for ensuring sound operation of the global DNS
If yes, yes, yes --> Trilateral situation
ICANN version
12
Trilateral situationParties and Relationships
a) ccTLD manager and national government: agreement or equivalent (see .ca Umbrella Agreement) covering local interestb) National government and ICANN: letter of other communicationc) ccTLD manager and ICANN: agreement covering global interest
Note: It is not one tripartite agreement
ICANN version
13
Trilateral situation -- ICANN and ccTLD Manager’s Responsibilities
ICANNa) Maintain authoritative root server systemb) Maintain authoritative and publicly available ccTLD databasec) Maintain audit trail regarding delegations
ccTLD Managera) Provide stable and secure registry and name server operationb) Participate in development of and abide by ICANN consensus policies, e.g., global interoperability, Whois, data escrow, etc.c) Contribute to ICANN's cost of operation
ICANN version
15
ccTLD AgreementICANN Obligations
Entry for ccTLD in Root Database Manager contact details ccTLD website URL IP Add and fully qualified domain names of
ccTLD’s nameservers Root Database Records
maintained by Data Controller security measures effect changes upon request
timescales
ccTLD version
16
ccTLD AgreementICANN Obligations
Operate World Root Servers containing ccTLD entries 24X7 Internet connectivity resolve name queries
Regeneration of zone files -- within 24 hours of change to Root Database
ccTLD version
17
ccTLD AgreementICANN Obligations
Publish info rate of capacity utilisation failures and corrective actions ICANN performance and
response times Number and location of root
servers
ccTLD version
18
ccTLD AgreementManager Obligations
Operate in accordance with Best Practice doc BP to be published
maintain TLD nameservers notification of changes to Root
Database entry maintain website with info on:
Manager, rules/procedures Non English sites - basic info in English
ccTLD version
20
ccTLD AgreementRemedies
ccTLD version
Remedies for breach by Manager
• Initiate discussions with Manager
• If Manager cannot be contacted, or does not respond, ICANN may give 28 days notice to Manager to remedy breach, o/wise seek alternative manager
Remedies for breach by ICANN
If ICANN in breach, Manager has right to demand enforcement of clause and claim damages
21
ccTLD AgreementMisc.
Duration perpetual
Termination If Manager ceases operations --> to
transfer database rights in TLD and further levels to successor or ICANN; or
give 6 months’ notice
ccTLD version
24
Comparison Legacy and ccTLD
Comparison
ccTLD
• Manager’s obligations
Best Practice -- work towards compliance
ICANN Payment
Legacy
•Manager’s obligations
Local Internet Community
no property rights
compliance with ICANN policies on DRP (to the extent applicable)
out of country registrations --> comply with ICANN policies
conversion to trilateral situation
25
Comparison Legacy and ccTLD
Comparison
ccTLD
• Others ICANN responsibilities Remedies Termination Duration Jurisdiction & applicable law
Legacy
26
Comparison Trilateral and ccTLD
Comparison
ccTLD
• Manager’s obligations
Best Practice -- work towards compliance
ICANN Payment
Trilateral
• Manager’s obligations
Stable and secure registry and nameserver operation
contribute to ICANN payment
compliance with ICANN consensus policies (global interoperability, WHOIS, data escrow)
27
Comparison Trilateral and ccTLD
Comparison
ccTLD
• ICANN obligations
maintain world root servers
maintain Root Database
regeneration of zone files
publication of reports
Trilateral
• ICANN obligations authoritative root server system
authoritative and publicly available database
audit trail on delegations
28
Comparison Trilateral and ccTLD
Comparison
ccTLD
• Others Remedies Termination Duration Jurisdiction & applicable law
Trilateral
• Agt with Government