ceis review q2 2016

15
CEIS REVIEW QUARTERLY REPORT Q2-2016

Upload: ceis-review-inc

Post on 12-Feb-2017

110 views

Category:

Economy & Finance


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CEIS Review Q2 2016

CEIS REVIEW QUARTERLY REPORT Q2-2016

Page 2: CEIS Review Q2 2016

ON MY MIND – CEIS PRESIDENT, JOE HILL

With the current healthy lending environment Banks are actively booking CRE At some organizations they are increasing C&I

transactions to grow their portfolios

Competition for quality borrowers is stiff The community banking community is not only

competing against each other but also against the larger banks or nonbanking organizations

These professional capabilities, below, have long since been the differentiator and competitive edge in dealing with competition

Relationship lending Knowing the business of the borrower Personal attention provided to borrowers

Causes of the competitive market Easing of credit quality requirements Concessions in pricing, structure and

overall terms

Loan and credit trends as well transactional levels should be tracked so the need for reconsideration in policies and practices can be identified

Page 3: CEIS Review Q2 2016

INDUSTRY EVENTS

Recent releases which pertain to our clients New Off-Site Loan Review Options with the Federal Reserve fir Communit

y Banks with les than $50 Billion in Total Assets

New MBL Rule Could Open up More Niche Lending

House Passes ICBA – Advocated Bill Improving Community Banks Access to Capital

Guidance for Banks’ Maintenance of Records, Record Retention & Examiner Access

Page 4: CEIS Review Q2 2016

IN THE SPOTLIGHT – DEAN MORGAN

Regional Executive Business Development Engagement Management throughout the Southern

Region of the US

Banking History/Past Titles 25 years of senior and executive level banking Senior Loan Officer SVP- Corporate Banking and

President & CEO

Page 5: CEIS Review Q2 2016

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE: CONCENTRATION RISK MANAGEMENT

The risks posed by concentrations of credit risk in general, and Commercial Real Estate concentrations in particular, have long been an area of focus for bank regulators.

FFIEC expectations for a risk management to manage the risk associated with Commercial Real Estate (CRE) concentrations:

2006 Interagency Guidance: Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices

Statement on Prudent Risk Management for Commercial Real Estate Lending

The remainder of this presentation will provide a high level summary of the 2006 regulatory guidelines and to review current areas of examination focus.

Page 6: CEIS Review Q2 2016

THE 2006 INTERAGENCY GUIDANCE The 2006 Guidance notes that the CRE sector is vulnerable

to business cycle Banks need to have appropriate risk management practices in

place and adequate capital to manage through these cycles

Key elements of risk management include: Identification of concentrations Board/management oversight Active portfolio management Management information systems Market analysis Underwriting standards Stress testing/sensitivity analysis Credit risk review

In summary, the Guidance noted that “regardless of its size, an institution should be able to identify and monitor CRE concentrations and the potential effect that changes in market conditions may have on the institution.”

Page 7: CEIS Review Q2 2016

IDENTIFICATION OF CONCENTRATIONS Regulators have established two thresholds that will assist them in

determining the level of a bank’s CRE concentration risk Construction, land development & other land = 100% of risk-based capital Commercial Real Estate = 300% of risk based capital and the

concentration has increased by 50% or more in the last 3 years This category includes properties where 50% or more of cash flow is from third

parties or where bank depends on sale of the property or permanent financing for repayment

The thresholds are intended to be benchmarks, above which the regulators would expect to see components of the risk management framework outlined in the Guidance

Banks are not exempt from supervision just because they are under these benchmarks

Different types of real estate carry different risks. Banks need segment

portfolios by stratifying the portfolio by risk characteristics and by sensitivity to economic, financial or business developments in order to be able to measure and manage risk

Page 8: CEIS Review Q2 2016

BOARD AND MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT + MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Management and the Board should involved in the process Establish policy guidelines and lending strategy for CRE

lending Require management to implement procedures and controls

that will ensure adherence to the Banks overall policies Use this information determine whether the Bank’s strategies

and policies (including limits and sub-limits) remain appropriate in light of current market conditions.

Banks will need adequate management information systems to monitor CRE risk

The MIS must report necessary information The MIS must be reviewed from time to time to make sure it

remains adequate The MIS must provide the means of reviewing both current

data and the extent to which measurements have changed over time, including risk rating migration.

Page 9: CEIS Review Q2 2016

MARKET ANALYSIS The regulators note that “the important objective is

that an institution should have the information necessary to assess the potential effect of market changes on its CRE portfolio and lending strategy.”

Banks should be able “demonstrate that it has an understanding of the economic and business factors influencing its lending markets”

Market risks the 2006 Guidance focuses on specifically: Demand Changes in cap rates Vacancy Rates Rents

Banks need to be able to identify these risks within their loan portfolios and continually adjust accordingly

Page 10: CEIS Review Q2 2016

CREDIT UNDERWRITING Clear underwriting policies are necessary if a Bank wants to

appropriately manage the risk in their portfolios Internal factors underwriting policies should address:

Historical experience Staff Capabilities Technological Resources

External factors underwriting policies should address: Market position The bank’s existing/future trade area Trends in lending and funding

Analysis should address the overall financial condition of the borrower as well as focusing on the specific project.

RE construction loans, Controls should be in place to make sure equity is contributed and

maintained A process that documents construction progress, track pre-sale/pre-

leasing and exception monitoring and reporting should be implemented

Page 11: CEIS Review Q2 2016

CREDIT UNDERWRITING CONT. Policies should establish maximum exposure by

Type of property and appropriate loan terms Pricing and LTV Requirements for feasibility studies and/or sensitivity/stress

testing Minimum hard equity contribution from the borrower Minimum borrower net worth Cash flow and debt service coverage Collateral valuation

Policies need exception-handling procedures Exceptions should be infrequent When an exception is necessary, they should be reported to

the Board and Senior management This report should include trends in the frequency of

exceptions and how many underwritings have these exceptions in place

Page 12: CEIS Review Q2 2016

STRESS TESTING/SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS + PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Banks with CRE levels in excess of the regulatory thresholds are expected to analyze the impact of changes in market conditions or interest rates on the portfolio

It should focus on the overall effects of changing market conditions and their impact on asset quality, capital and earnings

Analysis of capital levels in stressed scenarios can provide significant support for justifying CRE concentration, or for supporting increases in such a concentration.

Regulators look for these characteristics in the testing strategies:

Adjustments in credit risk ratings Contingency plans to limit or reduce exposure The use of derivatives

Page 13: CEIS Review Q2 2016

EXPLAINING THE DECEMBER 2015 STATEMENT

This statement draws attention to: Growth in CRE portfolios Declining CAP rates Rising property values The lack of negative signals from vacancy

and absorption rates and levels of non-performing loans and charge offs

Banks who complied with these regulations, were able to succeed during the downturn in 2007-2010:

Adequate policies, underwriting standards, credit risk management standards, and concentration limits set at board level, lending strategies and monitoring of same, and strategies to ensure capital/ALLL adequacy appropriate to portfolio risk

Preparation of borrower’s global cash flow analysis based on reasonable rents, sales projections and expenses

Performance of periodic market and scenario analyses of CRE portfolio

Provision of appropriate periodic information to the Board for the latter to assess ongoing appropriateness of strategy and policies

Assessment of ability of borrower to P&I/m when IO converts to payout/absorb impact of rising interest rates

Implementation of procedures for monitoring potential volatility in supply/demand for/of lot, retail/office space and MF units

Implementation of systems which give management and the board sufficient information to identify, measure, monitor and manage concentration risk.

Appraisal review process to ensuring adequate information to support market value conclusion

Page 14: CEIS Review Q2 2016

CURRENT AREAS OF SUPERVISORY FOCUS

Regulators look to focus on banks with CRE portfolios that have grown quickly, banks with CRE portfolios that include high risk segments, and/or banks whose CRE portfolios are approaching or have passed the regulatory thresholds.

When assessing risk, regulators will focus on: Diversification Geographic dispersion Underwriting standards Guarantees Level of pre-sale/pre-lease or other identified take out Portfolio liquidity Current market conditions The quality of recent new/ renewed underwriting Senior management’s and the Board’s efforts to monitor

trends

Page 15: CEIS Review Q2 2016

CONCLUSION

Banks with significant growth in CRE and which either currently exceed the regulatory benchmarks for a CRE concentration, or which are likely to exceed these levels in the near future, are encouraged to review their policies and processes to ensure that their risk management framework includes the components outlined in the 2006 and 2016 regulatory publications.

Contact CEIS to discuss your options Phone #: 888-967-7380