cems school profile 2009
DESCRIPTION
CEMS School Profile 2009. 2006-2009. The following line graphs represent 2006-2009 MEA scores in reading and math for each grade level. It is important to note that this data represents three different classes per chart. 2009 MEA School Comparison. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CEMS School Profile2009
2006-2009
• The following line graphs represent 2006-2009 MEA scores in reading and math for each grade level. It is important to note that this data represents three different classes per chart.
2006-2009 G5 MEAs
551
554
549
549
551
554555
556
544
546
548
550
552
554
556
558
2006 2007 2008 2009
readingmath¨
2006-2009 G6 MEAs
655
653
649
651
652
651 651 651
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
2006 2007 2008 2009
readingmath¨
2006-2009 G7 MEAs
758
762
755752
750
754
756
759
744
746
748
750
752
754
756
758
760
762
764
2006 2007 2008 2009
readingmath¨
2006-2009 G8 MEAs
858
859
857
854
855
854
853
858
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
2006 2007 2008 2009
readingmath¨
2009 MEA School Comparison
• The following tables represent a comparison of 2009 MEA scores for similar districts - Falmouth Middle School, Frank Harrison Middle School (Yarmouth), Greely Middle School (MSAD 51), and CEMS.
2009 MEA Performance Level Three and Four-Year Review
• The following bar graphs represent the performance level percentages- exceeds (E), meets (M), partially meets (PM), and does not meet the standard (DNM) - for reading and math. This data represents MEA performance of the same class over time.
3%
13%
81%
3%
3%
12%
75%
10%
2%8%
70%
20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 (g3) 2008 (g4) 2009 (g5)
Class of 2016 Three-Year MEA Reading Review
E
M
PM
DNM
3%
12%
62%
23%
3%10%
65%
22%
4%
12%
48%
36%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 (g3) 2008 (g4) 2009 (g5)
Class of 2016 Three-Year MEA Math Review
E
M
PM
DNM
1%
15%
81%
3%
2%
13%
81%
4%
1%12%
77%
10%
1%9%
73%
17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 3) 2007 (g 4) 2008 (g 5) 2009 (g6)
Class of 2015 Four-Year MEA Reading Review
E
M
PM
DNM
4%
18%
61%
17%
4%
15%
66%
15%
5%
10%
61%
24%
6%
18%
50%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 3) 2007 (g 4) 2008 (g 5) 2009 (6)
Class of 2015 Four-Year MEA Math Review
E
M
PM
DNM
5%
15%
62%
17%
4%
14%
75%
7%
1%11%
63%
25%
0%4%
45%
51%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 4) 2007 (g 5) 2008 (g 6) 2009 (g 7)
Class of 2014 Four-Year MEA Reading Review
E
M
PM
DNM
4%
24%
54%
18%
5%
15%
50%
30%
7%
20%
46%
27%
7%
8%
35%
50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 4) 2007 (g 5) 2008 (g 6) 2009 (7)
Class of 2014 Four-Year MEA Math Review
E
M
PM
DNM
6%
18%
69%
7%
6%
16%
62%
16%
4%9%
46%
41%
1%10%
44%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 5) 2007 (g 6) 2008 (g 7) 2009 (g8)
Class of 2013 Four-Year MEA Reading Review
E
M
PM
DNM
8%
20%
47%
25%
11%
19%
42%
28%
10%
8%
41%
41%
11%
7%
36%
46%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2006 (g 5) 2007 (g 6) 2008 (g 7) 2009 (8)
Class of 2013 Four-Year MEA Math Review
E
M
PM
DNM
MEA Two-Year Subgroup Comparison
• The following bar graphs represent performance level comparisons of the same subgroup - Identified Disability- for the 2008 and 2009 test sessions.
18%
35%
41%
6%
12%
41%
47%
0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 rding (g4) 09 rding (g5)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2016
E
M
PM
DNM
30%
29%
29%
12%
24%
29%
35%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 math (g4) 09 math (g5)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2016
E
M
PM
DNM
10%
36%
54%
0%
8%
42%
50%
0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 rding (g5) 09 rding (g6)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2015
E
M
PM
DNM
45%
10%
45%
0%
42%
17%
33%
8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 math (g5) 09 math (g6)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2015
E
M
PM
DNM
8%
69%
23%
0%
0%
31%
69%
0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 rding (g6) 09 rding (g7)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2014
E
M
PM
DNM
62%
30%
8%0%
62%
7%
31%
0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 math (g6) 09 math (g7)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2014
E
M
PM
DNM
27%
31%
37%
5%
14%
43%
36%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 rding (g7) 09 rding (g8)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2013
E
M
PM
DNM
46%
11%
32%
11%
57%
0%
29%
14%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
08 math (g7) 09 math (g8)
MEA ID Subgroup Comparison Class of 2013
E
M
PM
DNM