ces 2016 02 - lung cancer
TRANSCRIPT
CES 2016.02: Neoplasms of the LungMauricio Lema Medina MD
AcknowledgmentsDiego Morán MD
Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) and “Ground Glass” opacities (GGO)
Variable Low risk Intermediate risk High risk
Diameter 1.5 1.5-2.2 2.3+
Age cut-off 45 60
Smoking status Never Current 1pack/d Current 1+ pack/d
Smoking cessatin Quit 7+ yrs ago Quit 7- yrs ago Never quit
Nodule characteristics
Smooth Scalloped Corona radiata or spiculated
Solitary pulmonary nodule
Radiologic features likely to be benignStability over 2+ yrs.Benign calcification: central nidus, multiple punctate, “bulls-eye” and popcorn
SPN/GGO
Stable over 2 yrsBenign calcification
Less than 4 mm in diameter
Stop
High-risk of cancer
Tissue biopsy
Less than 8 mm
Repeat CT in 3 mo
8+mm/Low-Intermediate risk of cancer
PET-CT
Lung cancer
Page 6
Cáncer en el mundo
7 millones
Hepatocelular (2x)
Cérvix uterino (2x)
Esófago (2-3x)
11 millones
Pulmón (2x)
Mama (3x)
Próstata (2.5x)
Colon y recto (3x)
Estadísticas en 2002: Prevalencia – 25 millones
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer Statistics, 2009 CA Cancer J Clin 2009 59: 225-249
Mortalidad 1930-2005 USA: Hombres / Mujeres
Lung cancer
Projected life-time risk of developing lung cáncer is 6% and 8% in females and males, respectively (in the US).
Tobacco consumption closely parallels lung cancer incidence 20 years later.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer Statistics, 2009 CA Cancer J Clin 2009 59: 225-249
Incidencia/Mortalidad USA: Hombres
Incidencia Mortalidad
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer Statistics, 2009 CA Cancer J Clin 2009 59: 225-249
Incidencia/Mortalidad USA: Mujeres
Lung Cancer: Incidence and Mortality
New cases in 2013: 228,190- 40% with stage IV disease at
presentation (~ 90,000)
~ 160,000 deaths in 2012, comparable to prostate, pancreas, breast, and colon cancer combined
5-yr relative survival rate: 3.7% for patients with distant-stage disease
NCI. Non-small-cell lung cancer treatment (PDQ®). ACS. Cancer facts & figures: 2012. CDC. Lung cancer rates by race and ethnicity. Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review.
Estimated Cancer Deaths by Site, 2012
Other Cancers Lung Cancer
180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
Lung cancer
Prostate
Pancreas
Breast
Colon
Incidencia y mortalidad por de cáncer en Colombia
Registro Poblacional de Cáncer - Calihttp://rpcc.univalle.edu.co/
Cáncer del pulmón
Risk Factors for Lung Cancer Smoking
– Current: 2000%
– Former: 900%
– ETS: 30%
– 1 new mutation per 15 cigarettes smoked
Lung cancer deaths due to smoking
– ~ 91% males and 80% females[1]
Environmental factors[2]
– Second-hand smoke 3% to 5%
– Radon 3% to 5%
– Industrial pollution 0% to 5%
Radiation exposure Rare
– Asbestos, radon, radiation, silicosis, and berylliosis, nickel, chromium, mustard gas, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, bischloromethyl ether
– Arsenic exposure, talc, obesity, genetic factors
1. CDC. Lung Cancer. 2011.2. American Cancer Society. Lung Cancer. 2011.
Smoking cessation and lung cancer risk over time
Alquitrán
Oncogenes TSG
ras
myc
telomerasa
her2/neu
FHIT
RB
p53
p16
3p-EGFRCreado por: Mauricio Lema Medina - LemaTeachFiles© - 2004
ras
myc
telomerasa
her2/neu
FHIT
RB
p53
p16
3p-Hiperplasia
Ca in-situ
Carcinoma Invasor
55-74 yo, 30 ppy, current or
former smokers (up to
15 years)
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
NLST. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:395-409
R
LDCT qy x3
CXR qy x3LDCT: Low-Dose CT every year x3CXR: Chest X Rays PA and Lateral every year x3
Enrollment: 8/2002-4/2004Lung cancer deaths until: 12/2009
n=53.454
n=26.722
n=26.732
Variable LDCT CXR Rate ratio
+ Screening 24.2% 6.9%
False positive 96.4% 94.5%
LC detection* 645 (n=1060) 572 (n=941) 1.13 (1.03-1.23, )
LC Mortality* 247 309LC: Lung cancer; * per 100.000 person/years
LDCT decreases lung cancer mortality by 20% (95%CI: 6.8-26.7, p=0.004) in High-Risk patients
Lung cancer screening
Comments
LD CT 15-20% reduction of lung cancer mortality (about 3/1000 screened)
Yearly, 55-74, in heavy smokers (30ç ppy)
High incidence of incidental findings
Radiation exposure
CXR Ineffective
Harrison’s, 19th Ed, 2015
Lung cancer: clinical presentation
Cough: 8-75%
Dyspnea (3-60%)
Thoracic pain: 20-49%
Weight loss: 0-68%
Hemoptysis: 6-35%
Fever: 0-20%
Fatigue: 0-68%
Dysphagia: 0-2%
Bone pain: 6-25%
Stridor: 2%SVCS: 2-4%.Clubbing: 0-20%Cardiac tamponadeHoarseness
Lung cancer: clinical presentation
Cough: 8-75%
Dyspnea (3-60%)
Weight loss: 0-68%
Hemoptysis: 6-35%
Fever: 0-20%
Fatigue: 0-68%
Dysphagia: 0-2%
Bone pain: 6-25%
Stridor: 2%SVCS: 2-4%.Clubbing: 0-20%Cardiac tamponadeHoarseness
Thoracic pain: 20-49%
Adrenal gland
Lungs
Liver
Brain
Pleura
Clinical findings suggestive of metastatic disease
• Sindromes paraneoplásicos– Osteoartropatía pulmonar hipertrófica– Hipercalcemia (Escamocelular)– Sindrome de secreción inapropiada de hormona antidiurética– Sindrome de Cushing– Sistema nervioso
• Presentation with symptoms related to a paraneoplastic• Encefalomielitis• Neuropatía sensoria subaguda• Opsoclonus• Mioclonus• Neuropatía sensorial• Encefalopatía límbica• Sindrome de Eaton-Lambert
• Sistémicos– Anorexia– Pérdida de peso– Debilidad– Fatiga– Hipercoagulabilidad– Dermatomiositis
Lung cancer: diagnosis
Complexities of Lung Cancer Pathogenesis Result in Diverse Histologic Subtypes
SCC(~ 25%)
SCLC (~ 15%)
LPA (formerly BAC)(~ 5% to 10%)
Adenocarcinoma(~ 45%)
Large Cell (~ 5% to 10%)
NOS (~ 10% to 30%)
Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Sun S, et al. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007; 7:778-790.Travis WD, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;[Epub ahead of print].
Lung adenocarcinomas subtypes
Adenocarcinoma
Lepidic
Papillar
Acinar
Micropapillar
Solid
Lepidic (adenocarcinoma in-situ)
Lepidic (minimally invasive adenocarcinomas)Excellent prognosis
Poor prognosis
Lung cancer: IHC
Squamous- p40 or p63- CK+- Ck 5/6+- Ck 7 unusual
Adenocarcinoma- CK+- Ck7+- TTF1+- Napsin-A- Neuroendocrine (–)
Large-cell- CK+- TTF1 unusual- Neuroendocrine (–)
Large-cell neuroendocrine- CK+- TTF1+- CD56+- Chromogranin+- Synaptophysin+
Small-cell lung cancer- CK+- TTF1+- CD56+- Chromogranin+- Synaptophysin+
Lung cancer: “relevant” subgroups
NSCLC SCLC
NSCLC with “Driver” NSCLC withoud “Driver”
10%
15% 75%
NSCLC (without “driver”)
Squamous25%
NSCLC (without “driver”)
Non-squamous50%
90%
EGFR: 10%ALK/EML4: 4%ROS1: 1%
Mostly, adenocarcinoma
AdenocarcinomaSquamousLarge-cell
Kris MG, et al. ASCO 2011. CRA7506. Johnson BE, et al. IASLC WCLC 2011. Abstract O16.01
Lung Cancer Molecular Consortium Analysis in Lung Adenocarcinomas
No Mutation Detected KRAS
22%
EGFR17%EML4-AKL
7%
DoubleMutants 3%
BRAF 2%PIK3CA 2%HER2MET AMPMEK1NRASAKT1
ErlotinibGefitinibAfatinib
Selumetinib
Crizotinib
How to handle small tissue samples in lung cancer
p63 and TTF1
H&E
SCC Adeno
Genomics
SCLC
NeuroEndocrine
EGFRALK/EML4ROS1BRAFHer2
p63+ TTF1+
Lung cancer: anatomic staging
PET-CT +/- Brain MRI
NSCLC
TNM: Lung cancer
AJCC TNM Staging System, 7th Ed. (2010)
TNM: Lung cancer
AJCC TNM Staging System, 7th Ed. (2010)
TNM: Lung cancer
AJCC TNM Staging System, 7th Ed. (2010)
TNM: Lung cancer
AJCC TNM Staging System, 7th Ed. (2010)
Lung cancer: anatomic staging
PET-CT +/- Brain MRI
Potentially resectable Nonresectable/metastatic
Extrathoracic metastasesSVCSVocal cord / phrenic nerve paralysisMalignant pleural effusionCardiac tamponadeTumor within 2 cm of the carinaContralateral lung metastasesSupraclavicular metastasesContralateral mediastinal LN involvementPulmonary artery involvement
Mediastinal LN assessmentie, Mediastinoscopy
NSCLC
N2/N3 diseaseN0/N1 disease
Unresectable stage III Stage IVPhysiologic staging
Surgery +/- CT Definitive Chemo-RT
Physiologic staging
Appropriate FEV1- Greater than 2L for pneumonectomy- Greater than 1.5L for lobectomy
VOmax greater than 15 mL/(kg.min)
Surgery contraindicated in:- AMI within the last 3 months- AMI within the last 6 months (relative)- Uncontrolled arrhythmias- FEV1 less than 1L- DLCO less than 40%- Severe pulmonary hypertension- pCO2 greater than 45 mmHg
NSCLC no metastásico: tratamiento
CIRUGÍA EN NSCLC
Se recomienda cirugía para T resecables (T1-T3), sin compromiso mediastinal (N0-N1)- Lobectomía o pneumonectomía (+ disección ganglionar mediastinal).- Considerar SBRT en casos selectos.- Se recomienda quimioterapia adyuvante a estadíos II y III
No se recomienda cirugía para pacientes con T4, N2 o N3- Si no hay metástasis, proceder con quimiorradioterapia (Cisplatino + Etopósido)
RADIOTERAPIA EN NSCLCEstadíos I, II, IIIA no quirúrgicosConsiderar SBRTComo parte de terapia multimodal en estadío IIIB (con quimioterapia).Control de síntomas presentes o potenciales en estadío IV
- Intratorácico- Cerebral y Sistema Nervioso Central- Hueso
QUMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE- Estadíos II-III (algunos incluyen Ib)- Dupletas basadas en cisplatino x4 meses
NSCLC: Prognostic Factors
Factors correlated with adverse prognosis in resected patients- Presence of pulmonary symptoms- Large tumor size (>3 cm)- Nonsquamous histology- Metastases to multiple lymph nodes within a TNM-defined nodal station- Vascular invasion
For patients with inoperable disease, prognosis is adversely affected by poor performance status, weight loss of more than 10%, male gender
Advanced age alone has not been shown to influence response or survival with therapy
NCI. Non-small-cell lung cancer treatment (PDQ®).
The many faces of stage III NSCLC
Post surgical N2/N3+ disease- Adjuvant CT- Consider adjuvant RT
Known N2/N3+ disease- Definitive chemo RT with platin-based chemotherapy- Consider chemo RT with platin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery (if lobectomy is sufficient) in
non-bulky N2 disease.
Superior sulcus tumors- Arise in the apex of the lungs- Invade the 2nd and 3rd ribs, brachial plexus, subclavian vessels, stallate ganglion and vertebral body
- Pancoast syndrome: pain in the shoulder or chest wall or radiate to the neck and ulnar aspect of the upper limbs.- Horner’s syndrome
- Neoadjuvant Chemo-RT followed by surgery (if not N2/N3 disease)- Excellent LT OS: 50+%
Stage IV - NSCLC – PS 0-1
NSCLC without “Driver”
NSCLCSquamous*
NSCLCNon-squamous
CT with Platinum +Pemetrexed or
Paclitaxel + Bevacizumab
CT with Platinum+Gemcitabine or Paclitaxel
*Bevacizumab is contraindicated due to fatal bleeding*Pemetrexed is ineffective in squamous histology
Stage IV - NSCLC – PS 0-1
NSCLC with “Driver” NSCLC without “Driver”
NSCLCSquamous*
NSCLCNon-squamousmEGFT mALK/
ROS1
TKIs anti EGFR(Erlotinib o Gefitinib o Afatinib)
TKIs anti ALK/ROS1(Crizotinib)
CT with Platinum +Pemetrexed or
Paclitaxel + Bevacizumab
CT with Platinum+Gemcitabine or Paclitaxel
*Bevacizumab is contraindicated due to fatal bleeding*Pemetrexed is ineffective in squamous histology
Extracellular Domain
Transmembrane Domain
Intracellular Domain
EGF Pathway
• EGFR: transmembrane protein
Tyrosine Kinase Domain
Adapted from:Ciardiello F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1160-1174. www.clinicaloptions.com
HER/erbB family HER/erbB family
Salomon DS, et al. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1995;19:183–232Woodburn JR. Pharmacol Ther 1999;82:241–50
HER1EGFRerbB1
HER2erbB2neu
EGFTGF-αAmphiregulinBetacellulinHB-EGFEpiregulin
Heregulins
NRG2NRG3HeregulinsBetacellulin
Cysteine-richdomains
Tyrosine-kinasedomains
HER3erbB3
HER4erbB4
Ligands:
ProliferationApoptosis Resistance Transcription
TGFα Interleukin-8 bFGF VEGF
MetastasisAngiogenesis
Shc
PI3K
RafMEKK-1
MEKMKK-7
JNK ERK
Ras
mTOR
Grb2
AKT
Sos-1
EGF Pathway
www.clinicaloptions.com
EGFR in NSCLC: two distinct pathways
Nucleus
Adaptor
Survival
PIP2
PI3K
PIP3PTEN
AKT
Apoptosis regulators
Proliferation
Adaptor
Transcription factors
MAPK
MEK
RAFGTP-RASGDP-RAS
Sordella, et al. Science 2004
ATP ATP
Greater signalling through the MAPK pathway producing excessive cell proliferation
Higher affinity for ATP than mutant receptor, so greater competition with EGFR TKIs for binding sites; higher concentrations needed to inhibit
Successful inhibition of wild-type EGFR reduces proliferation and halts tumour growth
Higher incidence of stable disease
EGFR wild-type
EGFR in NSCLC: two distinct pathways
ATP
Nucleus
Adaptor
Survival
PIP2
PI3K
PIP3PTEN
AKT
Apoptosis regulators
Proliferation
Adaptor
Transcription factors
MAPK
MEK
RAFGTP-RASGDP-RAS
Sordella, et al. Science 2004
ATP
Preferential signalling through the PI3K-mediated anti-apoptotic pathway – ‘oncogene addiction’
Reduced affinity for ATP means EGFR TKIs have less competition for binding sites; lower concentrations sufficient to inhibit
Successful inhibition of mutated EGFR produces ‘apoptotic shock’
Higher incidence of complete or partial response
EGFR mutation +ve
EGFR mutation +ve NSCLC:different epidemiology
Majority of mutations are exon 19 deletions or L858R point mutations in exon 21
EGFR
Chromosome 7
Shigematsu, et al. JNCI 2005; Murray, et al. JTO 2008
n=3,303
Exons 1–16
Exon 17
Exons 18–24
Exons 25–28
Extracellular domain
Transmembrane domain
TK domain
Regulatory domain
EGFR transcript EGF protein
Exon 18 Exon 19 Exon 20 Exon 21
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inci
denc
e (%
)
EURTAC: PFS in ITT Population
Erlotinib (n = 86)Chemotherapy (n = 87)
HR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.25-0.54; log-rank P < .0001)
PFS
Prob
abili
ty
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
00 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33
Mos
5.2 9.7
Patients at Risk, nErlotinibChemo
8687
6349
5420
328
215
174
93
71
40
20
20
00
Rosell R, et al. ASCO 2011. Abstract 7503.
pTNM 7pTNM 7thth Edition Edition
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 2 4 6 8 10YEARS AFTER SURGERY
IAIBIIAIIBIIIAIIIBIV
Deaths / N1168 / 36661450 / 31001485 / 25791502 / 22522896 / 3792
263 / 297224 / 266
MST119814931221317
5 Year 73% 58% 46% 36% 24% 9% 13%
From:From: Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K et al. The IASLC lung cancer project: proposals for the Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K et al. The IASLC lung cancer project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 706-714of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 706-714
TNM Stage Category (Ver 7)
Cáncer de pulmón de células pequeñas - SCLC
SCLC
Carcinoma broncogénico de células pequeñas (SCLC)
Generalidades- Menos común que el NSCLC (1/6, aprox.)- Mayor asociación con tabaquismo- Diseminación a distancia mucho más precoz en la
historia natural- El espectro más agresivo de neoplasias
neuroendocrinas
Carcinoma broncogénico de células pequeñas (SCLC)
Patología – - Carcinoma de células pequeñas (SCLC)
- Célula pequeña, redonda y azul. - Tiñe positivo para cromogranina y sinaptofisina (marcadores
neuroendocrinos)
Patrones de diseminación - Masa central con extenso compromiso hiliar y mediastinal. - Metástasis al:
- Hueso, - Hígado, - Cerebro, - Pulmón, - Adrenales.
SCLC
Estadificación- ESTADÍO LIMITADO:
- T1-4 (excluyendo derrame pleural) N0-3M0: - Usualmente se puede cubrir en un campo de radioterapia.
- ESTADÍO EXTENDIDO: - Estadío IV: M1, y estadío III con derrame pleural.
- Supervivencia a 5 años - Estadío I:
- Supervivencia a largo plazo del 70% (luego de cirugía y quimioterapia). - Estadío Limitado:
- Supervivencia mediana 4 meses sin tratamiento, - Supervivencia mediana 17 meses - Curación en el 5-10%.
- Estadío Extendido: - Supervivencia mediana 2-4 meses sin tratamiento. - Se incrementa a 8-10 meses con terapia actual - Aproximadamente 3% se curan
Small-Cell Lung Cancer: work-up and management
CT-Chest/Abdomen + Brain MRI +/- Bone Scan
SCLC
Stage I All others
PET-CT + Brain MRI
Confirmed Stage I
Surgery + EP
Limited-Stage Extended-stage
EP + RT + PCI EP +/- PCI
EP: Etoposide + Cisplatin x4 months
70% LT survival Median OS: 20 months Median OS: 9 months
Further reading
• Neoplasms of the Lung, in Harrison’s 19th Ed, Chapter 107 (507-523)