ch prc statement of work title: detailed …...chprc statement of work title: detailed design for...
TRANSCRIPT
CH PRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area ·-
APPROVALS PRINT NAME
BTR* Ralph Wilson
· CAM I ~roject Controls•• Jan Pennock
Contracting Officer*** Carl Shaw
• Approval for technical ~ • • Approval for funding availability
• 0 Approval for contractibility
Page 1 of56
Revision 0 August 21, 2017
Prepared by: Ralph Wilson
SIGNATURE
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 2 of 56
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS
1.0 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 6
1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6
1.2 Background Information .................................................................................................... 6
1.2.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 7
1.2.2 Cask Storage System (CSS) ............................................................................................ 8
1.2.3 WESF Modifications ........................................................................................................... 8
1.2.4 Cask Storage Area (CSA) ............................................................................................... 10
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK – GENERAL ................................................................................................ 12
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK – SPECIFIC ................................................................................................. 13
3.1 Task 1 - WESF Modifications Detailed Design ............................................................ 13
3.1.1 Task 1.1 - WESF Modifications Design Management ................................................ 13
3.1.2 Task 1.2 - WESF Modifications Preliminary Design ................................................... 16
3.1.3 Task 1.3 – WESF Modifications Final Design .............................................................. 18
3.1.4 Task 1.4 - WESF Modifications Services during Construction (Option 1) ............... 20
3.2 Task 2 - CSA Works Detailed Design ........................................................................... 21
3.2.1 Task 2.1 - CSA Works Design Management ............................................................... 21
3.2.2 Task 2.2 - CSA Works Preliminary Design ................................................................... 22
3.2.3 Task 2.3 - CSA Works Final Design .............................................................................. 22
3.2.4 Task 2.4: - CSA Works Engineering SDC (Option 1) ................................................. 22
3.3 Special Requirements...................................................................................................... 22
3.4 Acceptance Criteria .......................................................................................................... 23
3.4.1 Detailed Design ................................................................................................................ 23
3.4.2 Engineering SDC .............................................................................................................. 23
3.5 Organizational Interfaces ................................................................................................ 24
3.6 Work Not Included ............................................................................................................ 24
3.7 Buyer Furnished Materials and Equipment .................................................................. 25
3.8 Site Conditions and Known Hazards ............................................................................. 25
3.9 Site Coordination Requirements .................................................................................... 25
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 3 of 56
4.0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................... 26
4.1 Project Documents ........................................................................................................... 26
4.2 Design Interfaces.............................................................................................................. 26
4.3 Codes and Standards ...................................................................................................... 27
4.4 CHPRC Procedures ......................................................................................................... 27
4.5 Relevant Hanford Site Drawings (Information Only) ................................................... 28
4.6 Exhibits ............................................................................................................................... 28
4.7 Work Location / Access Requirements ......................................................................... 29
5.0 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................. 30
5.1 Training and Qualification (General) ............................................................................. 30
5.2 Personnel Qualifications (Position-Specific) ................................................................ 30
5.3 Personnel Security and Badging Requirements .......................................................... 30
5.4 Personnel Site Access and Work Hours ....................................................................... 31
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH AND QUALITY REQUIREMENTS .................................... 32
6.1 Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................ 32
6.1.1 CHPRC Quality Level Designation ................................................................................ 32
6.1.2 Contractor Quality Assurance Plan ............................................................................... 32
6.1.3 Other QA-related Requirements .................................................................................... 33
6.1.4 QA related to Software Products and/or Services where Software is Used ........... 34
7.0 MEETINGS and SUBMITTALS ................................................................................................................ 35
7.1 Meetings ............................................................................................................................ 35
7.2 Submittals .......................................................................................................................... 35
8.0 DELIVERABLES, PROJECT CONTROLS, MILESTONES, AND PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 36
8.1 Deliverables ....................................................................................................................... 36
8.2 Project Controls ................................................................................................................ 36
8.3 Milestones ......................................................................................................................... 37
8.4 Performance Schedule .................................................................................................... 37
ATTACHMENT 1 - Submittal Register………………………………………………………... 38
ATTACHMENT 2 – Test Program Example Documents …..……………………...…..……….47
ATTACHMENT 3 - Conceptual Design Report Comments deferred to Detailed Design…..…..48
ATTACHMENT 4 – Sample Lists of Facility Drawings (For reference only) ….….……....…. 53
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 4 of 56
ACRONYMS
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ATP acceptance test procedure
BTR Buyer’s Technical Representative
CAP capital asset project
CAT construction acceptance test
CD critical decision
CDR conceptual design report
CDSF contractor deliverable submittal form
CE&I control, electrical, and instrumentation
CFR code of federal regulations
CGET CHPRC General Employee Training
CHPRC CH2M Plateau Remediation Company
COR code of record
CSA Capsule Storage Area
CSP Capsule Storage Pad
CSS Cask Storage System
D/CV design/construction verification
DBI design basis input
DCM design compliance matrix
DCN design change notice
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
DOE-RL U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office
EAC estimate at completion
EJTA employee job task analysis
EVMS earned value management system
FAT factory acceptance test
FDC functional design criteria
FR field request
FRD functions and requirements document
GPR ground penetrating radar
HVAC heating, ventilation and air conditioning
IFC issue for construction
MCSC Management of Cesium and Strontium Capsules
MSA Mission Support Alliance
O&M operations and maintenance
OAT operational acceptance test
NAC NAC International, Inc.
NCR non-conformance report
PE professional engineer
QA quality assurance
RCI request for clarification or information
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 5 of 56
ACRONYMS (Continued)
SDC (Engineering) Services during Construction
SDDR supplier deviation disposition request
SLF Storage, Laydown, and Fabrication
SOW Statement of Work
SSC structure, system, and component
TMS Temperature Monitoring System
UCS Universal Capsule Sleeve (component of CSS)
VCC Vertical Concrete Casks
VCT Vertical Cask Transporter
W&FMP Waste & Fuels Management Project
WESF Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 6 of 56
1.0 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
As a Prime Contractor to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the CH2M HILL
Plateau Remediation Company (CHPRC) is focused on safe environmental cleanup of the
Central Plateau of the DOE Hanford Site. The CHPRC scope of work includes
environmental remediation activities, treatment and disposal of radioactive waste
streams, management of spent nuclear fuel, and disposition of nuclear materials and non-
reactor nuclear facilities.
This Statement of Work (SOW) is for engineering and design services in support of the
CHPRC W-135 Project, also referred to as the Management of Cesium and Strontium
Capsules (MCSC) Project. The MCSC Project is centered on the Waste Encapsulation
and Storage Facility (WESF) which is a Hazard Category 2 non-reactor nuclear facility
located adjacent to B Plant in the Hanford 200 East Area. The mission of WESF is the
safe and compliant storage of 1,936 cesium and strontium capsules.
The overall objective of the MCSC Project is to transition the capsules from underwater
storage in WESF pool cells to a new dry-storage facility for long-term storage pending
availability of a permanent disposal option. Major project operational activities include
retrieval of the capsules from the pool cells, packaging of the capsules into a Cask
Storage System (CSS), and transfer of the casks to a new Capsule Storage Area (CSA).
Major supporting activities to prepare for operations include: procurement of the CSS,
design and construction of WESF modifications to accommodate CSS packaging
equipment, and design and construction of the new CSA including cask haul path
improvements and a contractor storage, laydown and fabrication (SLF) yard.
The services specified in this SOW include Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications
and for the CSA (including haul path improvements and SLF yard). The SOW also
includes an optional scope item (Option 1) for the Contractor to perform engineering
services during construction (SDC).
The services specified in this SOW are designated Quality Level 2 (QL-2) in accordance
with CHPRC procedures PRC-PRO-QA-268, Control of Purchased/Acquired Items and
Services, and PRC-PRO-QA-268, Graded Approach. Refer Section 6.1, Quality
Assurance, for further information.
1.2 Background Information
The following paragraphs provide supplemental background information relevant to the
SOW. Refer Section 3.0 for a detailed description of SOW activities.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 7 of 56
1.2.1 General
As of January 2017, the 1,936 cesium and strontium capsules stored underwater at WESF
contained 91 million curies of radioactivity, representing a significant fraction of the total
radioactive inventory of the Hanford Site. The WESF is now being operated beyond its
original design life. The facility relies on active systems to provide building ventilation,
maintain pool cell water levels, and monitor the capsules. These systems are becoming
more difficult to operate and maintain as they age, with corresponding increases in costs.
The planning for final disposal of the cesium and strontium capsules originally assumed
they would be shipped to a high-level radioactive waste repository. The Yucca Mountain
Nuclear Waste Repository, as designated by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act Amendments
of 1987, was to be the repository for spent nuclear fuel and other high-level radioactive
wastes. However, federal funding for the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository
ended in 2011, leaving the Hanford Site without a disposal pathway for the capsules.
Recognizing the need for continued safe storage of the capsules at the Hanford Site for an
indefinite period, the DOE prepared a Mission Need Statement for the Management of the
Cesium and Strontium Capsules (DOE/RL-2012-47, Rev 6). The DOE-HQ approved this
Mission Need Statement and Critical Decision 0 (CD-0) on November 5, 2015, and
established the Management of Cesium and Strontium Capsules (MCSC) Project. The
project is managed for the DOE Richland Operations Office (RL) by CHPRC under the
Plateau Remediation Contract (PRC) (DE-AC06-08RL14788) in accordance with DOE O
413.3B, Program and Project Management for the Acquisition of Capital Assets.
The objective of the MCSC Project is to transfer the capsules from current underwater
storage at WESF to a new dry-storage facility which will safely and compliantly store the
capsules for an extended period. CHPRC-02252 (Revision 3), Management of the
Cesium and Strontium Capsules Project (W-135) Functions and Requirements Document,
identifies the high-level functions and requirements that must be satisfied by the Detailed
Designs supporting the MCSC Project.
In general terms, the MCSC Project involves three interfacing scopes of work to establish
readiness for capsule packaging and transfer operations:
A. Cask Storage System. Procure the Cask Storage System (CSS) including ancillary
equipment required for capsule packaging operations.
B. WESF Modifications. Design and construct facility modifications as needed to
prepare WESF for CSS system deployment and packaging operations.
C. Capsule Storage Area. Design and construct a Capsule Storage Area (CSA),
associated CSS cask haul path road improvements, and a separate storage, laydown
and fabrication (SLF) area for use by the CSS contractor.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 8 of 56
Regarding Item A (Cask Storage System), the CHPRC has placed a turnkey contract with
NAC International (NAC) for design, fabrication, installation and testing of the CSS and
ancillary equipment. Conceptual design documents have been issued and NAC is now
finalizing the conceptual design report (CDR) and proceeding with preliminary detailed
design activities.
For Items B & C (WESF Modifications and CSA, respectively), pre-design activities and
conceptual designs are now complete. By this SOW, CHPRC now intends to source a
qualified design consultant to develop the Detailed Designs and (as scope Option 1) to
perform Engineering Services during Construction (SDC).
The following paragraphs provide additional background information on the scope of the
MCSC Project, with primary focus on the WESF Modifications and CSA scopes (the
subject of this SOW).
1.2.2 Cask Storage System (CSS)
CHPRC-02622 (Revision 4), Cask Storage System (CSS) Functional Design Criteria
(Project W-135), identifies the functional and technical requirements for the structures,
systems, and components (SSCs) comprising the CSS.
NAC International document 30059-R-02 (Revision A), NAC Conceptual Design Report
for the Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules Project (MCSC), provides
CSS conceptual design information, primarily for the cask system itself. The CDR has
undergone CHPRC review and is now in revision by NAC for resubmittal as a final
document. Upon CHPRC acceptance of the CDR, NAC will prepare the CSS Detailed
Design. Relevant to this SOW, note that the CSS design will provide the key design
inputs for the WESF Modifications and CSA Detailed Designs.
1.2.3 WESF Modifications
CHPRC-03011 (Revision 1), WESF Modifications Functional Design Criteria (Project
W-135), identifies the functional and technical requirements for SSCs associated with the
WESF Modifications scope.
CHPRC-03329 (Revision 0), WESF Modifications (W-135) Conceptual Design Report,
identifies the WESF Modification scope elements listed below, organized by location
within WESF. Refer to the WESF Modifications CDR for detailed information.
Note that the items listed below are indicative only. As described in Section 3, the
Contractor performing Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications shall initially review
the design basis and confirm the specific design scope required to satisfy MCSC Project
requirements.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 9 of 56
WESF Truck Port
o Structural/Civil
Removal of loading dock and stairs located within the truck port
Truck port floor reinforcement and apron modification
Truck port floor and apron surface specifications for air pallet
Truck port roll-up door removal and replacement
Truck port floor and apron area drainage upgrades.
o Mechanical, Piping & Fire Sprinkler System Modifications
Relocate fire protection system piping to increase clearances
Remove unused small diameter piping to increase clearances.
o Electrical
Power (permanent or temporary) for CSS equipment; see CDR for
truck port electrical loads summary.
o HVAC
Relocate a section of ductwork within truck port and the
corresponding exterior section to increase clearances.
WESF Canyon
o Structural/Civil
Canyon deck: Confirm canyon deck load capacity to handle CSS-
related loads
Canyon deck: Remove cover block lifting bales for Cells A-F
Canyon crane: Install a camera system for canyon overhead crane.
o Mechanical
Confirm capability (i.e., through calculation) of the WESF canyon
crane to support CSS Contractor-specified remote, electric impact
wrench operation and to support any other capsule packaging
equipment or tools. The CSS Contractor will provide the
necessary design input information including wrench weight and
torque data.
o Electrical
Power (permanent or temporary) for CSS equipment; see CDR for
WESF canyon electrical loads summary.
o Compressed Air
Provide compressed air service for CSS-related equipment; refer
CDR for WESF canyon compressed air load summary.
G Cell
o Structural/Civil
Confirm G Cell floor load capacity to handle CSS-imposed loads
Assess impacts (if any) of new G Cell cover block on the WESF
structure, in particular the loads imposed by the cover block on the
existing structure.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 10 of 56
o Mechanical
Provide services/support as needed for CSS-related equipment,
including but not limited to:
Automated welding system including UCS up-ender
UCS evacuation/helium backfill system
Helium mass spectrometer leak detection system
o Electrical
Provide power (permanent or temporary) as needed for CSS
equipment; refer CDR for G Cell electrical load summary
o Process Air
Provide process air for CSS equipment. Confirm if new wall
nozzle penetrations are required.
o HVAC
Supplemental cooling capability to meet criteria established by
CSS Contractor.
Other
o Compressed Air & Specialty Gases
Tubing runs from WESF Service Gallery bottle racks to the Truck
Port and to G Cell.
1.2.4 Cask Storage Area (CSA)
CHPRC-02623 (Revision 1), Capsule Storage Area (CSA) Functional Design Criteria
(Project W-135), identifies the functional and technical requirements for the SSCs /
facilities comprising the CSA scope.
CHPRC-03328 (Revision 0), Cask Storage Area (CSA) (W-135) Conceptual Design
Report, identifies the CSA-related scope elements listed below. Refer to the CSA CDR
for detailed information.
Note that the items listed below are indicative only. As described in Section 3, the
Contractor performing Detailed Design for the CSA shall initially review the design basis
and confirm the specific design scope required to satisfy MCSC Project requirements.
Cask Storage Area (CSA)
o CSA cask storage pad (CSP)
o CSA operational pad
o CSA yard area
o Security fencing and lighting
o Temperature monitoring system (TMS) and communications interface
including weather-tight enclosure
o Utilities interface.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 11 of 56
Storage, Laydown and Fabrication (SLF) area
o SLF fabrication and assembly pad and associated concrete apron area(s)
o SLF yard area
o Security fencing, gates and lighting
o Utilities interfaces.
Haul path roadway upgrades
o Roadway widening, regarding, resurfacing at selected locations to
accommodate the CSS cask transporter
o Transitions / ramps connecting existing road network to the WESF truck port,
the CSA (CSP & CSA Operational Pad), and the SLF area.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 12 of 56
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK – GENERAL
This SOW specifies Detailed Design services for upgrades to existing Hanford facilities/
SSCs and for acquisition of new facilities/SSCs as required to implement the CSS and
accomplish the MCSC Project objective of moving the 1936 cesium and strontium
capsules from underwater storage in WESF pool cells to a new dry storage facility.
Specifically, the Contractor shall develop Detailed Designs for the WESF Modifications
and the CSA elements of the MCSC Project (refer Sections 1.2.3 and 1.2.4 for indicative
scope of these elements). The SOW also includes scope Option 1 for the Contractor to
perform engineering services during construction; this option will be exercised at the sole
discretion of CHRPRC.
The Detailed Design work is currently planned to start in October 2017 and to be
complete in July 2018. The Engineering SDC activities (if Option 1 is authorized by
CHPRC) are currently anticipated to start in May 2019 and to complete within 12
months.
The Contractor shall manage the WESF Modifications and CSA Detailed Designs as two
separate but related tasks, each with its own subtasks and corresponding design
management and technical deliverables. This requirement supports CHPRC’s intent to
contract separately for WESF Modifications and for CSA construction services, and it is
consistent with a CHPRC requirement to track costs separately for these two scope
elements.
Design management deliverables for each task include but are not limited to work plans,
design basis review technical memoranda, interface control documentation, and project
closeout packages.
Preliminary and Final Detailed Design technical deliverables shall include but not be
limited to design reports, construction package design documents (e.g., drawings and
specifications), engineering package design documents (e.g., design basis information,
calculations), and documents related to testing of equipment and systems.
Engineering Services during Construction (Option 1) deliverables shall be as specified by
CHPRC upon authorization, but are expected to include a typical range of construction-
phase engineering documentation (refer Section 3.0 for details).
The Contractor shall be responsible to complete a documented review of design bases /
design inputs prior to Preliminary Design, and again prior to Final Design. The
Contractor shall take appropriate action to resolve open issues in coordination with
CHPRC (e.g., through interface communications with Stakeholders, issuing formal
requests for clarification or information [RCIs], conducting site walk downs and
performing field measurements).
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 13 of 56
3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK – SPECIFIC
The Consultant shall manage delivery of the Work described in this SOW as two separate
tasks, consistent with the MCSC Project WBS. These tasks are:
Task 1: WESF Modifications Detailed Design
Task 2: Capsule Storage Area Detailed Design.
Each of these tasks has multiple subtasks as described in this section. The Contractor
shall separately manage and report on project quality, schedule, cost, and safety
performance using this structure.
3.1 Task 1 - WESF Modifications Detailed Design
The general scope of WESF Modifications is summarized in Section 1.2.3 and includes
the items below.
WESF Truck Port modifications (including apron modifications)
WESF Canyon modifications
WESF G Cell modifications
WESF utility modifications (e.g., electrical, instrumentation, compressed gases
delivered to required locations to satisfy CSS / facility requirements).
However, note Task 1.1 which requires the Contractor to review the WESF Modifications
design basis, resolve open issues and confirm the scope of detailed design.
3.1.1 Task 1.1 - WESF Modifications Design Management
A. General
The Contractor shall provide all technically qualified personnel; engineering, design and
administrative services; management and supervision; equipment, supplies and software;
and other items as necessary to perform the Work.
Detailed Design deliverables shall be issued in two phases: Preliminary Design and Final
Design. As defined in PRC-PRO-EN-40271, Engineering Design Process, Preliminary
Design shall correspond to 60% design maturity and Final Design shall correspond to
90% design maturity. (The remaining 10% is nominally reserved for any emergent
design activities performed during the construction phase such as for field changes and
for preparation of as-built drawings prior to turnover.)
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 14 of 56
Deliverables for each phase are described in detail in subsequent sections, but in general
terms shall include:
Preliminary Design Report and Final Design Report
Construction package design documents (e.g., drawings, specifications and
equipment lists)
Engineering package design documents (e.g., design basis documents,
engineering analyses, design calculations)
Testing program-related documents (e.g., overall test plan, test documents for
specific equipment/systems).
The Contractor’s Final Design issue-for-construction (IFC) design documents and
approved supporting engineering package design documents shall be comprehensive and
at a level of detail that is sufficient to allow the construction contractor to proceed with
procurement and construction activities with no additional A/E design development
required. The Contractor shall be responsible to prepare any steel reinforcement detail
drawings (shop drawings) and bar bend schedules for reinforced concrete works.
However, shop drawings for mechanical equipment/systems shall be by the constructor.
As optional scope (Option 1) under this SOW and at the sole discretion of CHPRC, the
Contractor shall provide Engineering SDC during the WESF Modification and CSA
construction phases. Refer Section 3.1.4 (Task 1.4) for additional details.
B. Work Plan
Following Contract award, the Contractor shall develop a Work Plan (controlled
document) for delivery of the Detailed Design. The contents of the Work Plan shall be
consistent with corresponding elements of the Contractor’s proposal, revised to reflect
any comments provided by CHPRC. After CHPRC review of the Work Plan, the
Contractor shall revise and resubmit the Work Plan for CHPRC approval prior to
initiating Preliminary Design.
The Work Plan shall address the following at a minimum, either directly or by reference
to other relevant Contractor program documents:
Design objectives and scope; preliminary drawing list
Design team organization; training and qualification
Design control; Environmental, safety, health, and quality (ESHQ) management
Design technical approach (e.g., design objectives and scope, constraints and
assumptions, design activities, interim and final deliverables, risks)
Project controls.
If CHPRC exercises Option 1 for Engineering SDC (Task 1.4), the Contractor shall
prepare and submit a separate focused Work Plan to address those activities.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 15 of 56
C. Design Integration
The Contractor shall proactively manage and perform design integration activities as
needed to ensure its Detailed Design deliverables support effective MCSC Project
delivery. Coordinating with CHPRC, the Contractor shall identify and control all
relevant project design interfaces, including but not limited to those listed in Section 4.2,
Design Interfaces. Section 3.5, Organizational Interfaces, lists organizations directly
relevant to design interfaces as well as other organizations having roles in the MCSC
Project. All organizational interfaces will be coordinated through CHPRC.
In the Work Plan, the Contractor shall confirm its understanding of the scope of project
interfaces and establish by what means / tools it plans to document control these
interfaces.
D. Design Basis
At initiation of each design phase and again at completion of Final Design, the Contractor
shall assess the status of the design basis (e.g., functional requirements, design criteria,
project-specific design inputs). The purpose is to identify comprehensively and in detail
any open design basis issues that require resolution to support design completion. The
assessment shall include but not be limited to review of the latest revisions of: MCSC
Project Functions & Requirements Document (FRD) and Functional Design Criteria
(FDC) documents; MCSC Project CDRs including CDR review comments deferred to
Detailed Design (refer Attachment 3); design basis input matrices (refer CDRs); Code of
Record (COR) documents; relevant WESF and Hanford utilities design documents; site
characterization reports, engineering walk-down reports; Stakeholder interface
documentation, and any other relevant technical or management documents.
The Contractor shall document the reviews in formal technical memoranda to be
submitted to CHPRC for review and concurrence. The technical memoranda shall
include design basis input matrices including additional columns as necessary to facilitate
action tracking (e.g., assigned responsible persons, due dates, support required from
CHPRC or other organizations). The technical memoranda shall indicate if any design
basis documents require revision by CHPRC and also identify any additional physical
scope elements requiring design but not previously accounted for.
Coordinating with CHPRC, the Contractor shall take appropriate actions to close
identified design basis open items; e.g., through interface communications with
Stakeholders, issuing formal requests for clarification or information (RCIs) (refer PRC-
PRO-PM-8037), conducting site walk downs and performing field measurements.
The Contractor shall perform on-site verification of physical interfaces to existing
facility/Hanford Site systems to verify assumptions prior to beginning design. Sole
reliance on existing facility drawings and other historical design documents shall be
avoided to the extent possible to mitigate the known risks of inaccurate or missing as-
built drawings and imperfect configuration control. On-site verifications shall be
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 16 of 56
performed through visual inspections and measurements with CHPRC support. Reliance
on facility/system SME interviews alone for design basis information should be a last
resort. All related meetings, interviews, walk-downs, field measurements, etc. shall be
formally documented for the project record.
The Contractor shall proactively manage design basis input registers throughout the
project with the intent to close open items as soon as possible. The status of design basis
open items shall be reviewed with CHPRC during weekly status meetings.
3.1.2 Task 1.2 - WESF Modifications Preliminary Design
The Contractor shall perform Preliminary Design consistent with PRC-PRO-EN-40271,
Engineering Design Process, and other relevant procedures (refer to SOW Section 4.4).
A. Deliverables. The Contractor shall document the Preliminary Design in a Preliminary
Design Report satisfying the requirements of PRC-STD-EN-40258, Preliminary/Final
Design Report. The Preliminary Design Report shall include (either as attachments
or by reference) the separately-issued preliminary design documents such as
calculations, drawings, specifications, etc. that are listed below and in Attachment 1,
Deliverables Register. Design deliverables shall be developed to a degree
commensurate with a 60% Detailed Design submittal, except for long lead items and
items for which vendor data is required for Final Design (these cases discussed
separately below). Preliminary Design deliverables shall include but not be limited to
the following, as applicable:
Preliminary Design Report
Functional Design Criteria Compliance Matrix
Compliance Matrix for HVAC modifications (refer Section 3.3-B & 6.1.2-C)
Engineering analyses and calculations
Radiological shielding calculations
Design drawings for construction
Construction specifications
Equipment lists and data sheets
Equipment outline drawings
Equipment procurement specifications
Long-lead equipment design, procurement, testing, and inspection documents,
including vendor cost and schedule estimates
Test Plan (defines overall testing plan for the Work; refer Att. 2 for example)
Design/Construction Verification (D/CV) Documentation
o Draft D/CV Plan (proposed design/construction verifications to be
performed during construction; refer Attachment 2 for example)
Factory acceptance test (FAT) documentation
o FAT requirements to be incorporated into equipment specifications
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 17 of 56
Construction acceptance test (CAT) documentation
o CAT requirements for inclusion in construction specification or SOW
o Draft CAT plans, specifications and procedures (for use by
constructor)
Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) documentation
o ATP requirements for inclusion in construction specification or SOW
o ATP plans, specifications and procedures (for use by CHPRC)
Operations acceptance test (OAT) documentation
o Draft OAT plans, specifications and procedures (for use by
Operations)
Project control planning deliverables related to construction phase
o Construction cost estimate
o Construction schedule estimate.
B. Design Review. The Contractor shall initially issue Preliminary Design deliverables
as “For Review” by DOE and CHPRC in accordance PRC-PRO-EN-8336, Design
Verification and PRC-PRO-EN-40264, Formal Design Review. Following the review
process, the Preliminary Design Report and selected other deliverables as determined
by the BTR shall be revised and resubmitted for acceptance by CHPRC. Comment
resolutions on the remaining Preliminary Design deliverables shall be incorporated as
part of ongoing design development leading to the Final Design submittal.
C. Equipment for which Vendor Data is required to perform Final Design. If the
Contractor identifies any item of equipment for which detailed vendor information is
required to support Contractor’s completion of overall Detailed Design, the
Contractor shall immediately bring this to the attention of the BTR. If confirmed, the
BTR may direct the Contractor to accelerate Final Design deliverables (e.g.,
equipment specifications) for these items to support early procurement such that the
vendor data is available when required.
D. Testing Program Documentation. CHPRC will implement a testing program in
accordance with PRC-PRO-EN-286, Testing of Equipment and Systems. The
Contractor shall develop the test program-related deliverables in the bulleted list
above. The Test Plan deliverable will identify the project equipment/systems to be
tested and the level of testing required to prove they are acceptable for beneficial use.
The testing program ‘requirements deliverables’ shall establish specific testing
requirements for inclusion in bid package specifications (e.g., FAT requirements for
equipment procurement, CAT requirements for construction). In addition, the
Contractor shall draft test plans, specifications and procedures (as applicable) for
equipment and systems; these will be finalized under Contractor’s Option 1
(Engineering SDC) scope for inclusion in work packages to be executed by the
constructor(s) and CHRPC Operations. For the Preliminary Design phase, testing
program deliverables shall be developed to a level commensurate with the level of
corresponding design of the equipment and systems in question.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 18 of 56
E. Contractor Support to Design Review. The Contractor shall support CHPRC’s review
of the Contractor’s Preliminary Design submittal as follows: (i) prepare and deliver a
design review kickoff meeting presentation, (ii) review and develop written proposed
comment resolutions, (iii) conduct comment resolution meeting(s) with reviewers to
obtain concurrence on resolutions, and (iv) issue final comment resolution
documentation.
F. Long Lead Items. The CDR did not identify any long-lead items requiring early
procurement, fabrication or construction. However, if the Contractor identifies any
such long-lead items during Detailed Design, it shall immediately bring these to the
attention of the BTR. If confirmed, the BTR may direct the Contractor to accelerate
Final Design deliverables for these specific items to support the project schedule, and
the Contractor shall comply with this direction.
3.1.3 Task 1.3 – WESF Modifications Final Design
The Contractor shall obtain BTR’s written approval to initiate Final Design activities and
shall perform Final Design consistent with PRC-PRO-EN-40271, Engineering Design
Process, and other relevant engineering procedures (e.g., refer Section 4.4). The Final
Design shall reflect any updates to design basis / design input information and shall
incorporate CHPRC-agreed resolutions of review comments on the Preliminary Design.
A. Deliverables: The Contractor shall document the Final Design in a Final Design
Report satisfying the requirements of PRC-STD-EN-40258, Preliminary/Final Design
Report. The Final Design Report shall include (either as attachments or by reference)
the separately-issued final design documents listed below:
Final Design Report
Final FDC Compliance Matrix
Compliance Matrix for HVAC modifications (refer Sections 3.3-B & 6.1.2-C)
Engineering analysis and calculations
Radiological shielding calculations
Design drawings for construction
Construction specifications
Draft submittal registers for construction contracts based on construction
specifications and equipment specification requirements
Equipment outline drawings
Equipment procurement specifications
Test Plan (refer Sect. 3.1.2 discussion)
Draft Design/Construction Verification (D/CV) Plan (refer Sect. 3.1.2)
Factory acceptance test (FAT) documentation (refer Sect. 3.1.2)
Construction acceptance test (CAT) documentation (refer Sect. 3.1.2)
Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP) documentation (refer Sect. 3.1.2)
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 19 of 56
Operations acceptance test (OAT) documentation (refer Sect. 3.1.2)
Project control planning deliverables for construction phase
o Construction cost estimate (consistent with PM-HBK-08-2017 for CD-3)
o Construction schedule estimate
Compliance certification that the Final Design complies with the project technical
baseline
Construction tendering support deliverables (refer Item E below).
B. Testing Program Documentation. Refer to the testing program general discussion
under Preliminary Design. For the Final Design phase, testing program deliverables
intended for inclusion in construction bid documents shall be fully comprehensive
and at an industry-standard level of detail. Draft test documents intended for
reference by relevant test organizations (e.g., constructor, operations) shall be
comprehensive and developed to a level that provides meaningful guidance on the
testing required. Note that under Option 1 (SDC) scope, the Contractor would be
directed to work directly with the responsible testing organizations to finalize
individual test procedures, etc. for inclusion in work packages.
C. Design Review. The Contractor shall initially issue the Final Design deliverables as
“For Review” by DOE and CHPRC in accordance PRC-PRO-EN-8336, Design
Verification and PRC-PRO-EN-40264, Formal Design Review. Following the formal
review process, the Final Design Report and all other deliverables shall be revised
and submitted to CHPRC for acceptance as final “Issue for Construction” documents.
D. Contractor Support to Design Review. The Contractor shall support CHPRC’s review
of the Contractor’s Final Design “For Review” submittals as follows: (i) prepare and
deliver a design review kickoff meeting presentation, (ii) review and develop written
proposed comment resolutions, (iii) conduct comment resolution meeting(s) with
reviewers to obtain concurrence on resolutions, (iv) issue final comment resolution
documentation, and (v) incorporate comment resolutions into a revised Final Design
Report and associated design documents.
E. Technical Support for Construction Tendering. The Contractor shall provide technical
support to CHPRC W&FMP during the construction tendering process. The CHPRC
BTR will identify the specific services required at the time of tendering; however, it
is assumed these services may include:
Draft a statement of work for Request for Proposal (RFP)
Compile design documents (e.g., drawings, specifications) for RFP
Compile technical elements of contractor submittal matrix for RFP
Prepare draft pre-bid presentation and attend pre-bid conference / site visit
Develop responses to bidder technical questions during bid period
Provide technical support to CHPRC staff during bid technical evaluation.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 20 of 56
3.1.4 Task 1.4 - WESF Modifications Services during Construction (Option 1)
As optional scope under this SOW and at the sole discretion of CHPRC, the Contractor
shall provide Engineering Services during Construction (SDC). Engineering SDC
deliverables and activities are anticipated to include but not be limited to the following:
Focused SDC Work Plan. The Contractor shall prepare and submit a focused
Work Plan for CHPRC review and acceptance. The focused Work Plan shall
address SDC scope, qualified resources, schedule, estimated cost as well as
relevant quality and design control requirements.
Package Design Documents for Constructor. The Contractor shall package
Detailed Design documents as required to issue Facility Modification Packages
(FMPs), Design Change Notices (DCNs), etc. for constructors work execution.
Review Constructor Submittals: The Contractor shall review constructor
submittals (e.g., materials, shop drawings, vendor drawings, temporary works) for
compliance with technical specifications, and disposition as appropriate.
Design Interpretation: As applicable, review incoming and prepare outgoing
Requests for Clarification or Information (RCIs) and take actions to disposition.
Attend meetings / conference calls with CHPRC and constructors / vendors to
respond to clarification questions; document same for the record.
Support Change Processes: As applicable, prepare, review and disposition Field
Requests (FRs), Design Change Notices (DCNs), Supplier Deviation Disposition
Requests (SDDRs) and any other such documents. At the direction of the BTR,
support CHPRC preparation of technical input to construction contract change
packages.
Support Resolution of Quality Issues: Provide technical input for disposition of
Non-conformance Reports (NCRs) or any other quality program documentation
requiring technical review and disposition.
Periodic Engineer-of-Record Observation of Construction: Perform periodic
Engineer-of-Record observations of construction, including backfill, compaction,
foundation placement, erection, and installation, as necessary to confirm
compliance with engineering design. Any required testing will be performed by
other parties through CHPRC. Individual(s) identified as Engineer-of-Record
shall have current Washington State Professional Engineer registration(s).
Design/Construction Verification (D/CV) Plan: Prepare a final D/CV Plan for
design/construction verifications (a draft D/CV Plan is a Detailed Design
deliverable.) A D/CV Report shall be prepared and issued after each observation.
D/CV reports are intended for the engineer responsible for that specific portion of
the design to verify that it was constructed per the design requirements and intent.
D/CV inspections and reports shall be performed real-time during construction so
that inconsistencies with the design in the field can be corrected in a timely
manner. Refer to Attachment 2 for an example D/CV Plan and D/CV Report.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 21 of 56
Finalize Testing Program Documentation: Work with the respective testing
organizations to finalize individual test plans, specifications and procedures (as
applicable) for inclusion in work packages to be used by those organizations
during testing. Drafts of these documents are Detailed Design deliverables.
As-Built Drawings and Specifications: At the completion of construction and
prior to acceptance testing, all project design calculations, drawings and
specifications shall be revised/updated to reflect as-built conditions and to
incorporate design changes. The CHPRC procedure PRC-PRO-EN-8016, Design
Change Notice Process, shall be used to revise the drawings.
Revised or Additional Design Calculations, Drawings and Specifications: The
Contractor shall prepare revised or additional design documents as required to
facilitate safe and efficient construction and to incorporate actual vendor data,
DCNs, and NCRs.
Consultation to CHPRC for Technical Requirements: The Contractor shall
provide consultation, as requested by CHPRC, to resolve questions concerning
technical requirements. This may also include evaluation of proposed alternate
design approaches intended to improve the construction.
On-Site Representation. The Contractor shall provide a design representative
(field engineer) to be full-time, on-Site during active construction periods to
coordinate SDC activities listed above and to ensure timely resolution of issues
during construction.
Refer to Section 3.4.2 for acceptance criteria related to SDC.
3.2 Task 2 - CSA Works Detailed Design
The general scope of CSA Works is summarized in Section 1.2.4 and includes the items
bulleted below:
CSA (e.g., capsule storage pad [CSP], operating pad, CSA yard, security and
property protection subsystem, and utilities)
Storage, laydown and fabrication (SLF) Area works (e.g., fabrication and storage
pad, laydown area, security and property protection works, and utilities)
Road works to enable transit of cask transporter from SLF to WESF and from
WESF to the CSA (e.g., new roadways to tie CSA/SLF areas to existing road
network and widening/improvements to existing roads).
However, note Task 2.1 which requires the Contractor to review the WESF Modifications
design basis, resolve open issues and confirm the scope of detailed design.
3.2.1 Task 2.1 - CSA Works Design Management
The text in Section 3.1.1 describing Design Management activities for WESF
Modifications is also applicable to Design Management activities for Capsule Storage
Area Works. For brevity, that text is not repeated here.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 22 of 56
3.2.2 Task 2.2 - CSA Works Preliminary Design
The text in Section 3.1.2 describing Preliminary Design activities for WESF
Modifications is also applicable to Preliminary Design activities for CSA Works. For
brevity, that text is not repeated here.
3.2.3 Task 2.3 - CSA Works Final Design
The text in Section 3.1.3 describing Final Design activities for WESF Modifications is
also applicable to Final Design activities for CSA Works. For brevity, that text is not
repeated here.
3.2.4 Task 2.4: - CSA Works Engineering SDC (Option 1)
The text in Section 3.1.4 describing Engineering SDC activities for WESF Modifications
is also applicable to Engineering SDC activities for CSA Area Works. For brevity, that
text is not repeated here.
3.3 Special Requirements
A. Professional Engineer supervision of design. The Contractor shall perform design
engineering and prepare design media (calculations, analyses, drawings,
specifications, procedures, reports) under the direction of a Professional Engineer
(PE) registered in the State of Washington. Engineering design documents shall be
stamped by a PE registered in the State of Washington. The responsibilities of the
assigned PE for preparation and control of each deliverable shall be in accordance
with laws and regulations of the State of Washington governing the practice of
engineering.
B. WESF HVAC Design. The Contractor shall prepare a compliance matrix to document
the extent to which requirements of the following are applicable to WESF ventilation
system modifications: (i) ASME NQA-1-2008, Quality Assurance Requirements for
Nuclear Facility Applications (with ASME NQA-1a-2009 addenda), (ii) ASME AG-
1-2015, 2015, Code on Nuclear Air and Gas Treatment, and (iii) ASME N511-2007,
2013, In-Service Testing of Nuclear Air Treatment, Heating, Ventilating, and Air-
Conditioning Systems. The matrix shall identify how the design complies with
applicable requirements, with references to relevant design documents. CHPRC
system engineers will provide supporting system information as needed.
C. Contractor’s design control program. The Contractor shall maintain approved
engineering procedures implementing the QA requirements specified in Section 6.1.
D. Property of the Government. All design calculations, analyses, specifications,
drawings and other detailed design documents produced under this Contract are
property of the United States Government.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 23 of 56
3.4 Acceptance Criteria
3.4.1 Detailed Design
The Detailed Design submittals shall meet the following criteria:
Final Design documents (including calculations and specifications) shall be
stamped by a PE registered in the State of Washington. Refer Section 3.3-A.
The Final Design submittals shall include (i) a Functional Design Criteria
compliance matrix that specifically identifies where each design requirement is
met in the design media, (ii) a compliance matrix specifically for WESF HVAC-
related requirements (refer Section 3.3-B), and (iii) a written statement certifying
that the Contractor’s design complies with Project technical baseline documents;
any CHPRC-approved exceptions are to be specifically noted.
Engineering and design submittals (including calculations, drawings and
specifications) require formal review and acceptance by CHPRC.
Final Design documents shall be developed to an industry-accepted standard level
of detail for an issue-for-construction (IFC) submittal, sufficient to support
procurement and construction without further A/E design development required
by CHPRC or its construction contractors.
The Contractor’s preparation, review and control of all engineering and design
documents shall be in accordance with Contractor’s approved procedures and
applicable CHPRC procedures and requirements, as required by this Contract and
incorporated provisions.
3.4.2 Engineering SDC
Additional acceptance criteria applicable to the Engineering SDC (Option 1) work scope
include:
Contractor-prepared DCNs shall comply with PRC-PRO-EN-8016, Design
Change Notice Process, Appendix A.
As-built drawings and specifications shall comply with the documentation
requirements of PRC-PRO-EN-8017, As-Built Verification and PRC-PRO-EN-
2001, Facility Modification Package Process.
RCIs, DCNs, NCRs and constructor submittals shall be dispositioned in a timely
fashion to support construction such that no field work is delayed.
Design/Construction Verification (D/CV) Plan shall be approved within two
weeks after contract award of Engineering SDC work scope.
D/CV Reports shall be completed within 5 days after the observation was
completed.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 24 of 56
Design calculations, drawings, and specifications shall be updated to reflect as-
built conditions and design changes, approved by CHPRC, and available for entry
by CHPRC into DMCS within two weeks of completion of construction.
Revised or additional design calculations, drawings, and specifications shall be
updated, approved by CHPRC in the form of DCNs, and ready for formal
issuance by CHPRC prior to being implemented in the field.
3.5 Organizational Interfaces
The Contractor shall be required to interface with multiple CHPRC and other
organizations during the course of the Work, including but not limited to those listed
below. The Contractor shall manage these interfaces through the CHPRC Contract
Specialist (or designee).
CHPRC W&FMP Projects and Engineering
CHPRC QA, Environmental and Nuclear Safety
W-135 CSS Contractor (NAC International)
CHPRC WESF Operations
Mission Support Alliance (MSA) roads, rail and utilities organizations
Hanford Fire Protection
Hanford Site Security.
3.6 Work Not Included
The following work is excluded from this Contract:
Engineering and design services for Cask Storage System (CSS)
Conceptual design for WESF Modifications and CSA works
Nuclear safety analyses and determinations
Environmental regulatory consulting
Cultural resource surveys and determinations
Subsurface investigations (e.g., geotechnical, geophysical, concrete coring)
Procurement of materials or equipment
Construction and construction management services
Construction quality control and inspection services
Factory and construction acceptance testing
Radiological controls facility/field surveys and oversight for field execution
Industrial health & safety assessments and oversight for field execution
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 25 of 56
3.7 Buyer Furnished Materials and Equipment
The Contractor is responsible to furnish all materials and equipment required to complete
the activities specified in this SOW, with the exception that CHPRC will provide any
PPE required for walk-downs within the WESF.
3.8 Site Conditions and Known Hazards
The Detailed Design services specified in this SOW shall be performed off-Site at the
Contractor’s facility. The Engineering SDC services (Option 1) shall be performed
primarily off-Site at the Contractor’s facility with the requirement that one individual
shall be assigned to work from the MCSC Project field office adjacent to WESF.
As required to support its work, the Contractor shall attend meetings and tours/walk-
downs at the WESF facility and at exterior areas around WESF (to support design for the
CSA, SLF and haul path improvements).
All Contractor tours / walk-downs shall be approved in advance by the BTR and
performed with a CHPRC escort with assistance from Radiological Control as required.
Planning for each tour / walk-down shall be performed consistent with CHPRC
procedures. In general, Site facility tours are expected to have low radiological risk. The
primary hazards to participants are expected to be slips, trips and falls, and struck against,
struck by, caught in or between hazards. For outdoor walk-downs, hazards may also
include tick, snake and insect bites, and sun/heat/hydration concerns. Specific site
conditions and known hazards will be communicated by the BTR or designee prior to the
walk-downs.
3.9 Site Coordination Requirements
The Contractor shall coordinate any on-Site activities in advance with the CHPRC BTR.
The Contractor shall make contact with the BTR or designee when arriving at the facility
site. Contractor personnel shall ensure they have received the necessary orientations,
safety briefings, and related training prior to touring the site / facility.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 26 of 56
4.0 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall perform all Work in strict accordance with requirements; design
criteria; national, state and local standards; specifications; drawings; exhibits and any
other documents which by reference are made part of the SOW. These include but are
not limited to the documents and requirements identified in the following paragraphs.
4.1 Project Documents
The Contractor’s design activities shall comply and be consistent with the following
MCSC Project documents:
CHPRC-02252 (Revision 3), Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules
Project (W-135) Functions and Requirements Document
CHPRC-03011 (Revision 1), WESF Modifications Functional Design Criteria
(Project W-135)
CHPRC-02623 (Revision 1), Capsule Storage Area (CSA) Functional Design
Criteria (Project W-135)
CHPRC-03275 (Revision 0) Capsule Storage Area and WESF Modifications
Code of Record (Project W-135)
CHPRC-03329 (Revision 0), WESF Modifications (W-135) Conceptual Design
Report
CHPRC-03328 (Revision 0), Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules
Project Cask Storage Area (CSA) (W-135) Conceptual Design Report.
As noted in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 (Tasks 1.2 and 2.2), resolution of certain CHPRC
review comments on the CDRs was deferred to Detailed Design. The Contractor shall
address these comments (see Attachment 3) during Preliminary Design and shall submit
documented resolutions to CHPRC with its “For Review” Preliminary Design submittal.
The Contractor shall obtain CHPRC’s specific written approval before any deviations are
permitted from the requirements specified in issued design basis documents and from the
design approaches reflected in the CDRs and in accepted comment resolutions.
The Contractor shall bring any apparent inconsistencies, errors or gaps in specified
requirements and design scope to the immediate attention of the CHPRC BTR.
4.2 Design Interfaces
The Work specified in this SOW involves design interfaces including but not limited to:
Physical / system interfaces between the MCSC Project sub-elements (e.g.,
between CSS SSCs and ancillary equipment, WESF modifications, and the CSA
scope including SLF Area and haul path improvements).
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 27 of 56
Physical / system interfaces with WESF facility (e.g., with WESF truck port,
canyon and G Cell structures; with WESF crane and master-slave manipulator
systems; and with WESF electrical power, HVAC, air and compressed gas
systems)
Physical / system interfaces with other relevant Hanford facilities/utilities (e.g.,
with Hanford Site road, rail and utilities systems).
The Contractor’s control of the design interface with the CSS scope is critical because
CSS design outputs form essential design inputs for the WESF Modifications and CSA
scopes. The Contractor shall therefore reference the following documents and have
ongoing interface with the CSS Contractor during design.
CHPRC-02622 (Revision 4), Cask Storage System (CSS) Functional Design
Criteria (Project W-135)
NAC International 30059-R-02, NAC Conceptual Design Report for the
Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules Project (MCSC) [To be
available for Contractor reference following Contract award.]
4.3 Codes and Standards
The Contractor shall comply with the codes and standards referenced in CHPRC-03275
(Revision 0), Capsule Storage Area and WESF Modifications Code of Record (Project
W-135), in the FDC documents listed in Section 4.1, and in the CHPRC procedures listed
in Section 4.4. The Contractor shall promptly inform CHPRC of any discrepancies that it
identifies and request resolution.
4.4 CHPRC Procedures
Engineering and design shall be performed consistent with relevant CHPRC procedures
as listed in the table below, latest revision.
It is highlighted that engineering design documents shall be prepared in compliance with
PRC-PRO-EN-40271, Engineering Design Process, and PRC-STD-EN-40279,
Engineering Drawing Standards. Drawings shall be in AutoCAD (Version 2014) format
and provided in a format that is fully editable. Also, testing-related documents shall be
prepared in accordance with PRC-STD-EN-40281, Engineering Test Documentation.
CHPRC Engineering Program Procedures
Document Number Title
PRC-GD-EN-40256 Engineering Codes & Standards
PRC-PRO-EN-097 Engineering Design and Evaluation (Natural Phenomena Hazard)
PRC-PRO-EN-286 Testing of Equipment and Systems
PRC-PRO-EN-2001 Facility Modification Package Process
PRC-PRO-EN-20050 Engineering Configuration Management
PRC-PRO-EN-440 Engineering Documentation Preparation and Control
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 28 of 56
CHPRC Engineering Program Procedures
Document Number Title
PRC-PRO-EN-8016 Design Change Notice Process
PRC-PRO-EN-8017 As-Built Verification Process
PRC-PRO-EN-8336 Design Verification
PRC-PRO-EN-40264 Formal Design Review
PRC-PRO-EN-40447 Electrical Equipment Approval and Acceptance
PRC-STD-EN-40254 Functional Requirements Document
PRC-STD-EN-40255 Functional Design Criteria
PRC-STD-EN-40258 Preliminary/Final Design Report
PRC-STD-EN-40259 Engineering Calculations
PRC-PRO-EN-40271 Engineering Design Process
PRC-STD-EN-40279 Engineering Drawing Standards
PRC-STD-EN-40280 Engineering Specifications
PRC-STD-EN-40281 Engineering Test Documentation
PRC-STD-EN-40451 Manufacturer’s Recommendations for Equipment
4.5 Relevant Hanford Site Drawings (Information Only)
The sample list of drawings in Attachment 4 is for information only; these will be made
available following Contract award and any other drawings applicable to the Work will
also be made available. The Contractor shall confirm any critical dimensions by
field measurements.
4.6 Exhibits
The Detailed Design shall be performed in accordance with the following exhibits. The
exhibits included below are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this SOW. They
shall have the same force and effect as if written into the body of the SOW.
Exhibit # Title
Project Documents re WESF Modifications and CSA (Refer Section 4.1)
1 CHPRC-02252 (Revision 3), Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules
Project (W-135) Functions and Requirements Document
2 CHPRC-03011 (Revision 1), WESF Modifications Functional Design Criteria (Project
W-135)
3 CHPRC-03329 (Revision 0), WESF Modifications (W-135) Conceptual Design Report
4 CHPRC-02623 (Revision 1), Capsule Storage Area (CSA) Functional Design Criteria
(Project W-135)
5 CHPRC-03328 (Revision 0), Management of the Cesium and Strontium Capsules
Project Cask Storage Area (CSA) (W-135) Conceptual Design Report
6 CHPRC-03275 (Revision 0), Capsule Storage Area and WESF Modifications Code of
Record (Project W-135)
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 29 of 56
Exhibit # Title
Project Documents re CSS Interface (Refer Section 4.2)
7 CHPRC-02622 (Rev 5), Cask Storage System (CSS) Functional Design Criteria
(Project W-135)
CHPRC Engineering Procedures (Refer Section 4.4)
8 See table in Section 4.4.
4.7 Work Location / Access Requirements
The work location for Detailed Design activities specified in this SOW shall be at the
Contractor’s offsite offices. Engineering SDC services (Option 1) shall be performed
primarily off-Site at the Contractor’s facility with the requirement that one individual
shall be assigned to work from the MCSC Project office adjacent to WESF.
In support of the Contractor’s work under the SOW, Contractor personnel may
participate in occasional site tours, walk-downs and meetings. The Contractor will
coordinate attendance at such forums with the CHPRC BTR. Refer also Section 3.8, Site
Conditions and Known Hazards, and Section 5.3, Security and Badging Requirements.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 30 of 56
5.0 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Training and Qualification (General)
A. The Contractor shall provide appropriately trained and qualified staff to perform the
types of work specified in this SOW. Contractor personnel shall maintain the
necessary expertise, qualifications and professional certifications to perform the
assigned work.
B. The Contractor shall provide any required job-specific training with the exception of
job-specific training only offered by the Site.
C. CHPRC shall provide Contractor staff with CHPRC General Employee Training
(CGET) as required for Hanford Site access and WESF safety indoctrination and
facility specific training for WESF access.
D. Contractor’s staff shall complete all required training prior to work.
E. Engineering SDC (Option 1): For on-site field construction observation/verification
activities performed in the field, each person will obtain a CHPRC-issued dosimeter,
and receive the following required CHPRC training/qualifications as determined by
an Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA):
1. CHPRC General Employee Training (CGET)
2. WESF safety indoctrination and facility-specific training
3. Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene Training, as applicable (See PRC-
PRO-SH-40078)
4. Radiological Worker I training for engineering support personnel performing on-
site field observation verification activities. Respirator mask fit training is not
required at this time.
5.2 Personnel Qualifications (Position-Specific)
CHPRC minimum expectations regarding selected key positions are specified in a
separate RFP exhibit.
5.3 Personnel Security and Badging Requirements
A. For any on-site tour, a CHPRC-issued security identification badge is required for
general site access; a minimum of two working days advance notice is needed for site
badging. Within two working days prior to an approved site visit, the Contractor
shall provide a completed Security Badge Request Form to the BTR for each person
to be involved. The Security Badge Request Form is available for download from:
http://chprc.hanford.gov/page.cfm/submittalsformsdocs
Escorted Visitor Accountability Badges will be provided while touring the facilities
as approved by the BTR.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 31 of 56
B. Contractor employees entering the Hanford Site will be required to submit to vehicle
searches and not personally carry or transport prohibited articles.
C. For any on-site work, see Special Provisions – On Site Services SP-5 for details.
5.4 Personnel Site Access and Work Hours
A. The standard work hours for CHPRC personnel are between 6:00 AM and 4:30 PM,
Monday through Thursday. Meetings with CHPRC and site access will be scheduled
for standard work hours.
B. The Contractor will have access to the job site based on the terms of the Contract.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 32 of 56
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, HEALTH AND QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall perform work safely, in a manner that protects employees, the
public, and the environment. The Contractor shall comply with and assist CHPRC in
complying with Environmental, Safety, Health, and Quality (ESH&Q) requirements of
all applicable laws, regulations and directives.
The following project-specific ESH&Q requirements are applicable to this scope of work
in addition to the requirements identified in the Contract General Provisions and, when
work is being conducted on site, the additional ESH&Q requirements in SP-5 Special
Provisions – On-Site Services.
6.1 Quality Assurance
The Contractor is responsible for performing quality work in compliance with the
requirements of this Contract.
6.1.1 CHPRC Quality Level Designation
The services specified in this SOW are designated Quality Level 2 (QL-2) in accordance
with CHPRC procedures PRC-PRO-QA-268, Control of Purchased/Acquired Items and
Services, and PRC-PRO-QA-268, Graded Approach. Quality Level 2 is assigned to
Safety Significant items not designated as QL-1 and to items and associated services
posing a moderate project risk. The requirements specified in this contract are intended to
be commensurate with the QL-2 designation, including the requirement for Bidder QA
Program evaluation during the bidding process and specification of appropriate
acceptance methods and criteria.
6.1.2 Contractor Quality Assurance Plan
A. The Contractor’s Quality Assurance (QA) Plan applied to the W-135 WESF
Modifications and CSA design shall be developed and implemented in accordance
with the following:
DOE O 414.1D, Quality Assurance
10 CFR 830, Nuclear Safety Management, Subpart A, Quality Assurance
Requirements
10 CFR 830.122, Quality Assurance Criteria
PRC-MP-QA-599, Quality Assurance Program
CHPRC-00189, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Environmental
Quality Assurance Program Plan.
The Contractor’s QA Plan shall be approved by CHPRC prior to commencement of
design activities.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 33 of 56
B. Plans, procedures, and engineering documentation relevant to the SOW shall be
prepared, reviewed, approved, and controlled in accordance with the Contractor’s QA
Plan, which requires approval by CHPRC.
C. Applicable quality requirements from ASME NQA-1-2008, Quality Assurance
Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications (with ASME NQA-1a-2009
addenda), include:
Requirement 1, Organization: Sections 100, 200, 300
Requirement 2, Quality Assurance Program: Sections 100, 200
Requirement 3, Design Control: Sections 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 900
Requirement 5, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings: Section 100
Requirement 6, Document Control: Sections 100, 200, 300
Requirement 16, Corrective Action: Section 100
Requirement 17, Quality Assurance Records: Sections 100, 200, 300
Requirement 18, Audits: Section 100
D. WESF ventilation system modifications shall be designed in compliance with a QA
program that meets the requirements of ASME NQA-1 as required by WAC 246-247,
Radiation Protection – Air Emissions. A Compliance Matrix (previously referred as
a required design deliverable) shall document the extent to which requirements of
ASME NQA-1-2008, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility
Applications (with ASME NQA-1a-2009 addenda), are applicable to the design,
procurement, construction, and operation of the ventilation system modifications.
This matrix shall also address the applicability of ASME AG-1-2015,2015, Code on
Nuclear Air and Gas Treatment, and ASME N511-2007, 2013, In-Service Testing of
Nuclear Air Treatment, Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning Systems.
6.1.3 Other QA-related Requirements
A. The Contractor is responsible for achieving and verifying the quality of the activities
performed and of the deliverables submitted under the Contract.
B. The Contractor is responsible to verify compliance with the codes, standards and
requirements specified in this SOW.
C. All work and processes are subject to review, inspection or surveillance at any time
by CHPRC at the Contractor facility, or any lower-tier subcontractor’s facility, as
applicable. CHPRC intends to perform at least one assessment of during the course
of the project of the Contractor’s adherence to its approved program documents. This
will be in addition to formal design reviews.
D. The Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work scope without prior
CHPRC approval. The Contractor shall conduct the quality control measures
necessary to ensure any subcontracted work conforms to Contract requirements.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 34 of 56
E. Contractor’s personnel shall be trained and qualified to perform the Work as specified
in SOW Section 5.
F. See also Contract, General Provisions, for additional requirements related to QA
programs.
6.1.4 QA related to Software Products and/or Services where Software is Used
Where software is used in the performance of the Work described in this SOW, such as
software used to analyze designs or perform calculations, the Contractor shall follow a
controlled software management program that is submitted to CHPRC for approval.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 35 of 56
7.0 MEETINGS AND SUBMITTALS
7.1 Meetings
A. The Contractor shall participate in the following meetings:
1. Contract kickoff meeting (following contract award and notice to proceed)
2. Contract status meetings (weekly)
3. Informal design review meetings (periodic at discretion of CHPRC BTR)
4. Formal design review meetings and subsequent comment resolution meetings
(upon submittal of major deliverables)
5. Workshops and other meetings to facilitate design development; resolve open
items; and optimize project safety, quality, schedule and cost (ad hoc as requested
by either party).
7.2 Submittals
The Contractor shall submit the documents listed in Attachment 1, Submittal Register, on
the dates indicated.
The Contractor shall make submittals to “[email protected]” using the Contractor
Document Submittal Form (CDSF) A-6003-061. Instructions for completion of the
CDSF are included with the form. Form A-6003-061 is available at:
http://www.plateauremediation.hanford.gov/index.php/page/10/).
The quantity, frequency and type of submittal shall agree with the requirements set forth
on the Submittal Register. A Submittal Number, entered on the CDSF by the Contractor
in accordance with the submittal register, shall be used to identify each submittal. CDSF
forms may be copied for submittals with different submittal dates.
When any submission is returned to the Contractor with a request for resubmission (i.e.,
marked as: “B - Minor Comments – Approved With Exceptions as Corrected Re-
submittal Required”; or “C - Not Approved Revise and Resubmit”), the Contractor shall
resubmit all corrected documents within the time specified on the resubmission notice or,
if no time is specified therein, within five (5) working days from the disposition date.
The Contractor shall contact the BTR if additional Submittal Numbers are required for
new submittals.
Changes to a Contractor’s deliverables, that have not been accepted by CHPRC as
complete shall be re-submitted using the CDSF form.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 36 of 56
8.0 DELIVERABLES, PROJECT CONTROLS, MILESTONES, AND
PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS
8.1 Deliverables
Contract deliverables are defined in SOW Section 3.0 and listed in Attachment 1,
Submittal Register. The deliverable submittal process is described in Section 7.2.
8.2 Project Controls
A. The Contractor shall submit the following project control deliverables:
1. Project Schedule. Within 10 days after Notice of Award, submit a project baseline
schedule covering the duration of Contract. The schedule should reflect that
submitted with the Contractor’s proposal, incorporating additional detail and
addressing any comments provided by the BTR after award. See item B below
for specific schedule format requirements.
2. Cost Estimate. Within 10 days after Notice of Award, submit a project cost
baseline, time-phased consistent with the project schedule deliverable.
3. Weekly Status Reports. The Contractor shall submit concise weekly status reports
in a format to be agreed with the BTR. At a minimum, these status reports shall
include: accomplishments, schedule and cost status updates, updated design basis
input register, and updated open issues register.
4. Monthly Status Reports. The Contractor shall submit monthly performance
reports. Specific report organization and content will be confirmed by the BTR
after award. However, the Contractor should expect the status report may include
standard earned value management system (EVMS) reports including progress
curves and variance analyses; achievements during the past month; planned work
activity for next 30 days; issues and concerns; and funds analysis including 75%
analysis and estimate-at-completion (EAC).
5. Monthly Accruals. The Contractor shall submit to CHPRC its cost accrual forecast
for each month by the 15th of that month.
B. The Contractor’s Project Control schedule deliverables shall adhere to the following
standards:
1. Schedules shall be in Primavera Project Planner P6 or compatible format.
2. Schedule format shall be a detailed, integrated, Critical Path Method time-scaled
logic diagram (activity bars and constraints) with a supporting table of activities.
3. The schedule shall show as a minimum: schedule activity bars, activity
descriptions and numbers, constraints, milestones, and critical path. Activity
durations shall be in working days. Activity titles shall be self-explanatory, with
abbreviations shown in a legend on the document. Restraining activities, total
float, and critical path shall be shown.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 37 of 56
4. The schedule shall identify activities and relationships for engineering, design,
and Contract deliverables, as well as for key interfaces.
8.3 Milestones
A. WESF Modifications Milestones
No. Milestone Date
1 Draft Work Plan for review 13-Nov-17
2 Revised Work Plan for acceptance 27-Nov-17
3 Draft Preliminary Design Report* for review 22-Jan-18
4 Final Preliminary Design Report* for approval 15-Mar-18
5 Draft Final Design Report* for review 14-Jun-18
6 Draft Final Design Report* for approval 26-Jul-18
7 Detailed Design Phase Technical Closeout 27-Sep-18
* Preliminary and Final Design Reports are defined to include all associated design documentation (e.g.,
drawings, specifications, equipment lists, calculations). Such design documents may be included as
attachments to the design reports or submitted as separate documents but referenced in the design reports.
B. CSA Milestones
No. Milestone Date
1 Draft Work Plan for review 13-Nov-17
2 Revised Work Plan for acceptance 27-Nov-17
3 Draft Preliminary Design Report* for review 22-Jan-18
4 Final Preliminary Design Report* for approval 15-Mar-18
5 Draft Final Design Report* for review 14-Jun-18
6 Draft Final Design Report* for approval 26-Jul-18
7 Detailed Design Phase Technical Closeout 27-Sep-18
* Preliminary and Final Design Reports are defined to include all associated design documentation (e.g.,
drawings, specifications, equipment lists, calculations). Such design documents may be included as
attachments to the design reports or submitted as separate documents but referenced in the design reports.
8.4 Performance Schedule
This release will be effective from the Contract Notice of Award through scheduled date
as agreed upon by CHPRC per the Contractor’s proposed schedule. The Contractor shall
perform Detailed Design activities as required to achieve the Milestones in Section 8.3.
Option 1 (Engineering Services during Construction) activities, if authorized by CHPRC,
are currently forecast to start May 2019 and to complete within 12 calendar months.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 38 of 56
ATTACHMENT 1 – Submittal Register
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
1
APW
MFC
E
Yes No Detailed Design Work Plan
(Draft for review) 30-Oct-17
PM, BTR
Engineering 4 3.1.1
2
APW
MFC
E
Yes No Detailed Design Work Plan
(Final for approval) 13-Nov-17
PM, BTR
Engineering 4 3.1.1
3
APW
P6
E
No No Detailed Design Schedule
(Draft for review) 30-Oct-17
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering
4 3.1.1, 8.2
4
APW
P6
E
No No Detailed Design Schedule
(Final for approval) 13-Nov-17
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering
4 3.1.1, 8.2
5
AP
GEN
E
No No Employee Training Records 2 days prior to visit BTR
IS&H 4 5.1
6 MFC
E No No Weekly Status Reports Every Monday
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering
3 8.2
7 MFC
E No No
Monthly Cost and Schedule
Performance Reports
First Monday of
Calendar month
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering
8 8.2
8
APW
MFC, PDF
E
Yes No Design Basis Review Technical Memoranda
(Draft for review prior to Prelim Design) 6-Nov-17
BTR,
Engineering
QA
4 3.1.1(D)
3.2.1(D)
9
APW
MFC, PDF
E
Yes No Design Basis Review Technical Memoranda
(Final for acceptance prior to Prelim Design) 20-Nov-17
BTR,
Engineering
QA
4 3.1.1(D)
3.2.1(D)
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 39 of 56
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
10
AP
PDF, MFC
E + 2 H
Yes No Preliminary Design Phase Deliverables
(Draft For Review) 22-Jan-18 See below. 12
3.1.2
3.2.2
10(a) MFC a. Preliminary Design Report
PM, BTR
Engineering, Ops
Environmental
Nuclear Safety
RadCon, IS&H
QA, CM
10(b) MFC b. FDC Compliance Matrix BTR
Engineering, QA
10(c) MFC
c. ASME AG-1 Compliance Matrix
BTR
Engineering, QA
10(d) GEN d. Engineering Analyses and
Calculations
BTR, Engineering
Nuclear Safety, QA
10(e) GEN e. Radiological Shielding
Calculations
BTR, Engineering
RadCon, QA
Nuclear Safety
10(f) DWG f. Design Drawings for
Construction
PM, BTR
Engineering, Ops
Environmental
Nuclear Safety
RadCon
IS&H, QA, CM
10(g) MFC g. Construction Specifications
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 40 of 56
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
10(h) MFC, PDF h. Equipment Lists and Data Sheets
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
10(i) PDF i. Equipment Outline Drawings
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
10(j) MFC j. Equipment Procurement
Specifications
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
10(k) MFC
k. Long-lead equipment design,
procurement, testing, and inspection
documents, including vendor cost and
schedule estimates
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Estimating
Engineering
Ops, QA, CM
10(l) MFC l. Factory Acceptance Test Plans,
Specifications, and Procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA
10(m) MFC m. Construction Acceptance Test
Plans, Specifications and Procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
Ops, QA, CM
10(n) MFC
n. Input to Operations acceptance test
plans, specifications, and
procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
Ops, QA, CM
10(o) MFC o. Construction Cost Estimate
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Estimating, CM
10(p) P6 p. Construction Schedule Estimate
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Estimating, CM
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 41 of 56
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
11
AP
MFC/DWG/
P6
E + 2 H
Yes No Preliminary Design Report
for approval 15-Mar-18
PM, BTR
Engineering
Nuclear Safety, QA
8 3.1.2
3.2.2
12
APW
MFC, PDF
E
Yes No Design Basis Review Technical Memoranda
(Draft for review prior to Final Design) 22-Jan-18
BTR,
Engineering
QA
6 3.1.1(D)
3.2.1(D)
13
APW
MFC, PDF
E
Yes No Design Basis Review Technical Memoranda
(Final for acceptance prior to Final Design) 8-Feb-18
BTR,
Engineering
QA
6 3.1.1(D)
3.2.1(D)
14 APW
E + 15 H Yes No
Final Design Phase Deliverables
(Draft For Review) 14-Jun-18 See below. 12
3.1.3
3.2.3
14(a) MFC a. Final Design Report
PM, BTR
Engineering, Ops
Environmental
Nuc Safety
RadCon, IS&H
QA, CM
14(b) MFC b. FDC Compliance Matrix
BTR
Engineering
QA
14(c) MFC
c. ASME AG-1 Compliance Matrix
BTR
Engineering
QA
14(d) GEN d. Engineering Analysis and
Calculations
BTR, Engineering
Nuclear Safety, QA
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 42 of 56
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
14(e) GEN e. Radiological Shielding
Calculations
BTR, Engineering
RadCon, QA
Nuclear Safety
14(f)
DWG
1H,1E
f. Design Drawings for
Construction
PM, BTR
Engineering, Ops
Environmental
Nuclear Safety
RadCon, IS&H
QA, CM
14(g) MFC
1H,1E g. Construction Specifications
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
14(h) MFC
PDF h. Equipment Lists and Data Sheets
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
14(i) GEN i. Equipment Outline Drawings
PM, BTR
Engineering
Ops, CM
14(j) MFC j. Equipment Procurement
Specifications
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
14(k) MFC k. Factory Acceptance Test Plans,
Specifications, and Procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA
14(l) MFC l. Construction Acceptance Test
Plans, Specifications, and Procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
Ops
QA, CM
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 43 of 56
Table A1-1: Submittal Register for W-135 Detailed Design for the WESF Modifications and CSA [Refer table footnotes.]
1.
No.
2.
Type,
Format &
No. of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC
Review Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
14(m) MFC
m. Operations Acceptance Test
Plans, Specifications, and
Procedures
PM, BTR
Engineering
Ops
QA, CM
14(n) MFC
1E n. Construction Cost Estimate
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Estimating, CM
14(o) P6 o. Construction Schedule Estimate
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Estimating, CM
15
APW
MFC/DWG
/P6
E + 2 H
Yes No Final Design Phase Deliverables for
approval 26-Jul-18
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA
8 3.1.3
3.2.3
16
APW
MFC, PDF
E
Yes No Design Basis Review Technical Memoranda
(For review with Final Design) 14-Jun-18
BTR,
Engineering
QA
4 3.1.1(D)
3.2.1(D)
17
APW
MFC
E
Yes No
FDC Compliance Matrix and
statement that certifies the
Contractor’s design complies with
Project technical baseline documents
2-Aug-18
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA
8 3.3
6.1.1
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 44 of 56
Table A1-2: Submittal Register for W-135 Engineering Services during Construction*
1.
No.
2.
Type, Format,
and Number
of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC Review
Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
O1-1
AP
E
Yes No Review of Vendor and Subcontractor
Submittals 4 days after receipt
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
4 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-2
APW
MFC
E
Yes No
Preparation, review and disposition of Field
Requests (FR), Requests for Clarification or
Information (RCI), Design Change Notices (DCN),
and Non-Conformance Reports (NCR)
2 days after receipt
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
2 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-3
AP
MFC
E
Yes No Design log of all proposed and incorporated
design changes
2 weeks after
construction
completion
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
8 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-4
AP
E
No No Engineer-of-Record Registration(s) NTP + 7 PM, BTR
Engineering 4
3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-5
AP
MFC
E
Yes No Design/Construction Verification Plan NTP + 14
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
4 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-6
AP
MFC
E
Yes No Design/Construction Verification Reports
5 days after
observation was
completed
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
4 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-7
AP
GEN/DWG/
MFC
E + 2 H
Yes No As-Built Design Calculations, Drawings, and
Specifications
2 weeks after
construction
completion
PM, BTR,
Engineering
QA, CM
Nuclear Safety
8 3.1.4
3.2.4
O1-8
AP
GEN/DWG/M
FC, E + 2H
Yes No Revised or Additional Design Calculations,
Drawings, and Specifications
Per project
requirements
PM, BTR
Engineering
QA, CM
Nuclear Safety
8 3.1.4
3.2.4
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 45 of 56
Table A1-2: Submittal Register for W-135 Engineering Services during Construction*
1.
No.
2.
Type, Format,
and Number
of Copies
3.
Technical
Submittal
4.
Vendor
Information
5.
Description / Document Title
6.
Submittal Date
(Calendar Days)
7.
Reviewer/ Approver
Organizations
8.
CHPRC Review
Time
(Work Days)
9.
SOW
Paragraph
Reference
O1-9
AP
GEN
E
No No Employee Training Records Prior to work BTR
IS&H 4 5.1
O1-10 MFC
E No No Weekly Status Reports Every Monday
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering, CM
3 8.2
O1-11 MFC
E No No
Monthly Cost and Schedule Performance
Reports
First Monday of
Calendar month
PM, BTR
Project Controls
Engineering, CM
8 8.2
* Note: The following Option 1 deliverables and associated submittal details are indicative only. If CHPRC elects to authorize this optional scope, this deliverables list will be revised by the BTR and instructed to the Contractor.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 46 of 56
1. Typically a numerical sequence (i.e., 1, 2, 3). However, other numbering systems may also be used.
2. Submittal type, format, and number of copies:
APW = Approval Required Prior to Work (CHPRC must approve the Contractor’s submittal prior to the Contractor being authorized to proceed with any
activity/work associated with the submittal).
AP = Approval Required (CHPRC must approve the Contractor’s submittal; however, work associated with the submittal may proceed prior to CHPRC
approval).
Format: Describes the type of submittal required (electronic or printed):
DWG An AutoCAD drawing using the Hanford standard formatting (See CHPRC-00263, Off-Site Vendor Instructions for the Preparation and Control of
Engineering Drawing).
MFC Microsoft Format Compatible application (Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint)
P6 A Primavera Project Planner schedule
GEN General or Open Format/Media
PDF Adobe Acrobat (Portable Document Format)
E Electronic
H Hardcopy
3. Technical submittals are Engineering or Quality affecting submittals. A Yes in this column designates the need for formalized comments, and a formalized comment
disposition process by the Contractor. Examples of Technical Submittals would include Engineering or Fabrication Drawings, or Certificates of Conformance.
4. Vendor Information for project record purposes.
5. Description / Document Title. Describe submittal.
6. Required submittal date or its relationship to project milestones. Examples are July 1, 2015, or Award + 15 days, Contract Completion +30 days.
A Date of Award
CD Conceptual Design Complete
PD Preliminary Design Complete
FD Final Design Complete
M Mobilization
SC Start of Construction
EC End of Construction
7. Approver Organization. Examples are BTR, Project Manager, CAM, Engineering, Quality Assurance, Safety, etc.
8. The number of Work Days required for review of the submittal.
9. SOW Reference: Cross reference to the SOW requirement that defines this submittal.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 47 of 56
ATTACHMENT 2 – Test Program Example Documents
Table A2-1: Test Program Example Documents
No. Document Type Sample Document for Reference Only
1 Example Design/Construction Verification Plan Design_Construction_Verification_Plan_Approved_Rev_0.pdf
2 Example Design/Construction Verification Report VR-M-20A_Transfer.
3 Example Test Plan HX TEST
PLAN_SGW-48781_-_Rev_01_.pdf
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 48 of 56
ATTACHMENT 3 – Conceptual Design Report (CDR) Review Comments deferred to Detailed Design
Table A3-1: Comments on WESF Modifications CDR deferred to Detailed Design
No. Comment Comment Response
1
LEMS-MCSC-17-CAL-002 calculates shielding requirements based on 100
mrem/h on contact to permit personnel entry without exposure to a high
radiation area (>100 mrem/h). The proximity of the two shield bells needs to
be considered in that if both bells were to have capsules in them and entry was
required, the dose rate between the bells would likely be >100 mrem/h.
Conservative assumptions should be employed at this stage to ensure weights of
equipment put into G Cell are not underestimated.
This case to be further evaluated in a following design phase after NAC has
completed CD. NAC has indicated recently that they may now need only one
shield bell. This has yet to be confirmed with NAC.
2
The rerouted duct from the manipulator repair shop to the truck port should be
located above normal walking level to preclude a tripping hazard. The duct
routing should also avoid thick walls/ceiling above the man door.
Noted. Will address in Detailed Design phase.
3 G Cell flows need to be measured. Noted. Will address in Detailed Design phase.
4
LEMS-MCSC-17-CAL-005 discusses heat load in G Cell. 85F degree canyon
temperature is more realistic that 75F degrees, especially during the summer
months. Replacement of lighting with lower heat producing equipment should
be considered.
Note that analysis sizing the chiller unit is based on higher Canyon temperature
(85F); the real controlling factor for G Cell heat removal is the temperature of
the incoming air (55F). Will address changing lighting as a potential mitigating
measure in Detailed Design phase.
5
Recent rain storms have identified issues with water entering the truck port
through the roll-up door. Design of the apron modifications and the new roll-up
door shall address water run-off issues.
Detailed Design to assess run-on/run-off issues (e.g., such as a trench drain at
truck port threshold that can be temporarily covered for air pallet operations).
6
Basis ventilation and or cooling outage could occur as a result of maintenance
or power outages. W-135 should evaluate if system outage is acceptable for
safety or planned outage. The results could cause ventilation or cooling to
become important to safety, and possibly require they be included with
emergency power supply. A requirement to provide emergency power to either
of these systems would invalidate an Electrical Load assumption (LEMS-
MCSC-17-CAL-006 rev 0, 3.0 A). No MCSC loads must be connected to
WESF emergency electrical power busses.
The hazard analysis process will address the potential effect of loss of cooling
and resulting temperatures. CHPRC-03011 Section 4.1.5 contains a
requirement that the ventilation system must be able to maintain acceptable
temperatures in the presence of a maximum loaded UCS heat source and also
considering welding. G Cell cooling will be addressed further during Detailed
Design. CHPRC-03011 contains design criteria for safety SSCs if they are
determined necessary.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 49 of 56
Table A3-1: Comments on WESF Modifications CDR deferred to Detailed Design
No. Comment Comment Response
7
Ensure that nozzles identified for electrical conductors are appropriate for that
usage.
Current configuration (as well as condition) of existing wall nozzles must be
verified during Detailed Design. Differences between H-2-94506 and the
drawings cited in this comment are an example of why this verification must
occur.
8
230V, 3 phase is not a readily available voltage at WESF. If this voltage or
208V, 3 phase is selected, additional transformers will be required. Also, NEC
220.5(A) does not recognize 230V 3 phase as a nominal system voltage.
Specify 3 phase equipment as 480V if possible.
Voltage and phases are as specified in vendor cut-sheet for the unit in question.
Unit was identified for conceptual design and costing purposes only. The
comment will be addressed during Detailed Design phase.
9
WESF loads prior to the W-130 Project is entered as 548.5kVA. This value is
based on two years of data ending on March 2015.
Data used are considered adequate for scoping level calculation, given the large
margin between power requirements and power availability. Base data to be
updated during Detailed Design.
10
Utility data for both transformers is available from EU. Future revisions should
treat Normal Bus 1 and Normal Bus 2 separately.
Data used are considered adequate for scoping level calculation, given the large
margin between power requirements and power availability. Base data to be
updated during Detailed Design.
11
Calculation LEMS-MCSC-17-CAL-005 implies that G-Cell ambient
temperature may reach 150F. Future revisions of this calculation will need to
include conductor temperature de-rating.
Issue to be addressed during Detailed Design. Current design for HVAC
systems assume a maximum temperature of 120F will be maintained.
12 Add modified G Cell cover block to elevation. Will added during Detailed Design when details available.
13
A Section A.4.6. On pages 16 thru 19 there are two different scenarios
analyzed. First scenario is: air pallet on the center of the concrete pad with no
air pressure; this load is represented with point loads. Second scenario is: air
pallet on the edge of the concrete slab, filled with air pressure; this is
represented with a distributed load.
I believe there should be a third scenario: edge calculation performed where the
air pallet could potentially lose air pressure leaving the slab and it resting on the
edge. This would need to be represented by point loads at the edge. This
scenario was not analyzed. Perform a calculation taking into account the air
pallet loosing pressure at the edge of the slab where the loading would be
represented with point loads, not distributed loads.
Concur. This scenario will be addressed during Detailed Design.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 50 of 56
Table A3-1: Comments on WESF Modifications CDR deferred to Detailed Design
No. Comment Comment Response
14
Section A.4.6. Perform a calculation showing if the two layers of concrete will
bond, and if they are strong enough for the loading or provide a basis for the 18
inch assumption.
There are a number of accepted methods to adhere new concrete to existing
concrete. These include cleaning, scoring, and applying bonding agents to the
existing concrete then pouring a new layer of concrete over. Other methods
include using post-installed rebar/anchors that are then developed into the new
concrete. The most efficient method will be evaluated and specified during
Detailed Design.
15
Section 2.0. In this calculation, the input data for the canyon floor takes into
account DTS and DTS stand. In the PowerPoint WESF Mods Design Review
15 May - Gerboth_170511, slide 42, there is a need to provide laydown area for
several pieces of equipment. Wouldn’t we need to follow up on this calculation
to ensure the floor loading does not exceed its limits as equipment is staged?
Concur. Will be performed during detailed design, as CSS vendor data on
equipment becomes available
16 Future duct modifications will likely involve disturbing asbestos insulation and
require agency notification or permit.
Will note in the CDR report that duct removal must consider asbestos-insulated
ducting. To be considered in Detailed Design.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 51 of 56
Table A3-2: Comments on CSA CDR deferred to Detailed Design
No. Comment Comment Response
1
DRWG W135-CSA-SK-C-007. Minimize area covered by entrance to the
operating area.
The current configuration accommodates concerns about maneuverability
during placement operations whilst maintaining minimal stress loads on the
VCT tongue, and provides a conservative basis for Conceptual Design cost
development / BOE. We concur that there are several opportunities to realize
reductions of construction costs and disturbance of soils by shortening the
access path and more closely coupling the entry to the Operations Pad whilst
keeping operational considerations that are unique to this access path in mind
(e.g. minimize impact to 7th, etc.). This optimization of the CSA access road
during Detailed Design when the number of VCCs, the final dimensions for the
CSP and Operations Pads, the weight of the VCCs, etc. are known; all have
impact on how the VCT / Tug package can be maneuvered. We will also have
a more detailed model of the VCT/Tug combination for a better assessment of
required / achievable turn radius.
2
Entry/exit to WESF truck port “S” curve turning radius has potential for undue
stress on VCT tongue.
During Detailed Design, all items that can be removed / relocated, without
undue impact on other site operations, will be identified and plans developed to
facilitate that removal / relocation effort. The CDR Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3
have been updated to further clarify this recommendation.
3
Requirements #132 & #133 compliance verification indicates a design dose rate
of <5 mrem/h at the fence line. An additional barrier will be necessary for
radiological controls to ensure dose rates are less than 0.05 mrem/h to meet 10
CFR 835 requirements for monitoring workers that may receive 100 mrem.
Noted that there was a typo in the value stated in the compliance matrix as the
CSS FDC states the limit as <0.5 mrem/hr. The typo will be corrected. Based
upon the CSS contractor shielding analysis, we can design and install additional
shadow shields at the CSP boundary fence and/or make use of administrative
controls to manage. To be addressed during Detailed Design.
4
Req. No. 59. What drives such a large SLF area? Can this area be reduced such
that Polaris Drive does not need to be relocated?
The current size of the SLF area was dictated by a stated requirement from
NAC. That said, NAC has not yet provided the basis of that requirement, nor
the key operations that might drive further design considerations, inclusive of
any that may drive or relieve the need for possible re-alignment of Polaris
Drive. These aspects will be further defined / refined during Detailed Design.
5 The FPE shall reevaluate the need for fire hydrant water supply to the CSA in
preliminary and final design.
Section 4.4.1 of the CDR has been updated to reflect the need to reevaluate the
need for fire hydrant water supply during Detailed Design.
6 The FPE shall reevaluate the need for fire hydrant water supply to the SLF in
preliminary and final design.
Section 4.4.1 of the CDR has been updated to reflect the need to reevaluate the
need for fire hydrant water supply during Detailed Design.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 52 of 56
Table A3-2: Comments on CSA CDR deferred to Detailed Design
No. Comment Comment Response
7
Incorporate crash bars into the final design for the CSA. CDR Section 4.4.1 states that the FPE shall confirm that the use of crash bars
on all personnel entry gates for the CSA and SLF have been incorporated into
the Detailed Design. Section 4.4.2 also reflects this requirement.
8
Incorporate crash bars into the final design for the SLF. CDR Section 4.4.1 states that the FPE shall confirm that the use of crash bars
on all personnel entry gates for the CSA and SLF have been incorporated into
the Detailed Design. Section 4.4.2 also reflects this requirement.
9
Perform and document site characterization activities during preliminary design
to verify levels of contamination in the surface and subsurface soil, and
vegetation at the CSA site are not at a level requiring future remedial actions.
The CDR, Sect. 4 is updated to recommend characterization for contamination
in surface and subsurface soils and vegetation at the site. If any contamination
requires remedial action, the CDRt also recommends action to identify early on
those actions necessary to address the concerns whilst supporting the progress
of the W-135 Project. Where possible these site characterization activities shall
be coordinated with any required geotechnical field investigations.
10
Where photographs of the site are used as background in the sketches, these
photos should be updated to reflect the most recent configuration of WESF (the
modifications of the K3 vent system).
The current Conceptual Design, design basis, and design approach will not
materially be affected by the recommended change, nor adversely impact the
BOE. The suggestion will be addressed in Detailed Design.
11
Need to use most recent WESF civil drawings that show location of new K3N
skid in all drawings and aerial photo overlays in order to accurately depict
obstructions.
The current Conceptual Design, design basis, and design approach will not
materially be affected by the recommended change, nor adversely impact the
BOE. The suggestion will be addressed in Detailed Design.
12
A Section 4.1.1. The proposed VCT haul path should be analyzed to include
the removal of the inactive crane (WESF-C41A), and provide a direct path
through the inactive crane area from the truck port to CSA.
During Detailed Design, all items that can be removed / relocated, without
undue impact on other site operations, will be identified and plans developed to
facilitate that removal / relocation effort. The CD Report Sections 4.1, 4.2, and
4.3 have been updated to further clarify this recommendation.
13 A number of WIDS sites and underground contamination areas are located near
the proposed site of the laydown area.
WIDS locations to be evaluated during Detailed Design.
14
Design calls for re-grading the road between the new laydown area and the
WESF apron, including filling in a dip in the road. Confirm that this is not
deliberate to accommodate water run-off.
This was discussed with MSA and they felt it not an issue based upon this
initial review. To be confirmed during Detailed Design.
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 53 of 56
ATTACHMENT 4 – Sample Lists of Facility Drawings (For reference only)
Table A4-1: WESF Facility Drawings
Drawing No. Rev. Topic
H-2-36982-1 9 Compressed Gas Modifications
H-2-38451-1 0 Yard Drain Plot Plan
H-2-66402 5 Architectural First Floor Plan Area 2
H-2-66418-1 2 Structural Second Floor Plan Area 2
H-2-66420 2 Structural Selections Area 2
H-2-66423-1 3 Structural Process Cells Plan
H-2-99425 5 Piping Engineering Flow Diagram
H-2-66430-1 6 Civil Utility Plan
H-2-66464-1 5 Electrical Power Plan, First Floor, Area 3
H-2-66464-2 0 Electrical Power Plan, First Floor, Area 3
H-2-66533 22 HVAC Control Diagram
H-2-66536 5 HVAC Plan First Floor
H-2-66537-1 9 HVAC Plan First Floor
H-2-66537-2 1 HVAC Plan First Floor, Sections
H-2-66537-3 0 HVAC Plan First Floor, Sections
H-2-66538 3 HVAC Plan Second Floor
H-2-66544-1 3 Fire Protection Sprinkler System First Floor & Details
H-2-66544-2 0 Fire Protection Sprinkler System First Floor & Details
H-2-66545 2 Fire Protection Sprinkler System Second Floor & Details
H-2-66766-1 2 In-Cell Light LF-17
H-2-66766-2 2 In-Cell Light LF-17
H-2-66988-1 12 Engineering Flow Diagram, Aqueous Make Up
H-2-67003-1 2 Drain System Piping Plan & Sections First Floor
H-2-67017-1 1 General & Service Piping, Area #1, Plan & Details
H-2-67018-1 8 Pool Cell Equipment & Piping Arrangement
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 54 of 56
Table A4-1: WESF Facility Drawings
Drawing No. Rev. Topic
H-2-67018-2 0 Pool Cell Equipment & Piping Arrangement
H-2-67018-3 0 Pool Cell Equipment & Piping Arrangement
H-2-67018-4 0 Pool Cell Equipment & Piping Arrangement
H-2-67020-1 5 General Service Piping, Area #3, Sections & Details
H-2-67021-1 4 General Service Piping, Area #2, First Floor Plan
H-2-67022-1 7 General Service Piping, Area #2, 2nd Floor Plan
H-2-67032-1 2 Embedded Piping, Plan & Sections, “G” Cell
H-2-67033-1 2 Embedded Piping, Plan & Sections, Cell “G”
H-2-67033-2 2 Embedded Piping, Plan & Sections, Cell “G”
H-2-67033-3 2 Embedded Piping, Plan & Sections, Cell “G”
H-2-67037-1 3 Service Piping, Area 2, Service Gallery, Sections & Details
H-2-67038-1 4 Service Piping, Area 2, Service Gallery, Sections & Details
H-2-67188-1 5 225-B Building Yard Area, Piping Details (Catch Tank)
H-2-67882-1 7 Service Piping, Area 2, Service Gallery Plan, Sect. & Details
H-2-67883-1 9 Service Piping, Area 2, Service Gallery Plan & Section
H-2-76598-1 1 Elec/Instm Part Plan – First Floor Col A-C/3-7.5
H-2-76598-2 1 Elec/Instm Part Plan – First Floor Col C-E/3-7.5
H-2-76598-3 1 Elec/Instm Part Plan – First Fl Col D-E/1-3 & Misc
H-2-94528-1 2 Nitrogen & Helium Supply – WESF Operating Gallery
H-2-94934-1 3 HVAC Control Elementary Diagrams
H-2-94934-2 3 HVAC Control Elementary Diagrams
H-2-94934-3 1 HVAC Control Elementary Diagrams
H-2-95292-1 1 Electrical Truck Port Heater Installation
H-2-96494-1 12 Flow Diagram Air System
H-2-96494-2 17 Flow Diagram Air System
H-2-96494-3 4 Flow Diagram Air System
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 55 of 56
Table A4-1: WESF Facility Drawings
Drawing No. Rev. Topic
H-2-96494-4 2 Flow Diagram Air System
H-2-96494-5 1 Flow Diagram Air System
H-2-966-43-1 17 Electrical One Line Diagram MCC-1
H-2-966-43-2 16 Electrical One Line Diagram MCC-2
H-2-966-43-3 16 Electrical One Line Diagram MCC-3
H-2-99425 5 Piping Engineering Flow Diagram
H-2-825969-1 11 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Dist’bn Key Site Plan
H-2-825969-2 3 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-825969-3 0 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-825969-4 1 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-825969-5 1 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-825969-6 2 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-828991-1 2 Piping Truck Port Plan
H-2-828991-2 2 Piping Truck Port Elevation
H-2-828991-3 1 Piping Truck Port Details, Sections & Views
H-2-828991-5 0 Piping Truck Port Details, Sections & Views
HNF-11557 0 WESF Compressed Air System Study (2002)
HNF-12360 1 Two-stage Oil-Free Rotary Screw Compressor Spec (2002)
CHPRC STATEMENT OF WORK
TITLE: Detailed Design for W-135 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage Area
Page 56 of 56
Table A4-2: Exterior Areas Drawings
Drawing No. Rev. Title
Utility Drawings
H-2-828885-1 5 Civil Alignment A Sta. 0+00 – 0+800
H-2-830460-9 2 Site Map Potable Water System 200 East Enlarged Plan
H-2-830460-9 2 MSA Sanitary Water Markup
Site Map Potable Water System 200 East Enlarged Plan
H-2-830461-9 3 Site Map Raw Water System 200 East Enlarged Plan
H-2-830461-9 22 MSA Raw Water Markup
Site Map Raw Water System 200 East Enlarged Plan
H-2-836143-1 5 Underground Utilities Composite Plan, North and East Yards
Fire Main Drawings
H-2-82569-1 09 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Distribution Key Site Plan
H-2-82569 11 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Distribution Key Site Plan
H-2-82569-2 03 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details
H-2-82569-6 02 Fire Protection Sanitary & Raw Water Details