chapter 3. personalistic norm a response to utilitarianism – the moral course of action based on...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 3
The Human Person
Personalistic Norm
• A response to utilitarianism – the moral course of action based on what can
accomplish the greatest good for the greatest number of people
– The few can be “sacrificed” for the good of the many
– St. John Paul II persons are used in the same way things are used; people can be seen as obstacles, treated as objects or disposable
Discussion
• What are some ways we can use one another?• Can a boyfriend and girlfriend use each other?• Can young people use their parents or vice
versa?
The Human Person
People were created to be loved.
Things were created to be used.
The reason the world is in chaos
is because things are being
loved and people are
being used.
(Unknown)
Societal Values Not valued by society
Societal Values Not valued by society
God’s Values
The Human Person
Reflection
• What does it mean to be equal in dignity and how does that affect one’s interactions with others?
Definition of Murder
“The deliberate killing of an innocent human being”• Which qualifies as murder?– Killing someone in an automobile accident– Killing a game for meat– Taking someone’s life as the only means of self-
defense– Abortion
Abortion
Opinion
What challenges in today’s families might make abortion look like an attractive “solution”?
What do you think is the most important factor in the abortion industry – women’s rights or economics?
Abortion• Each person in the womb is a unique child of
God who deserves to be treated with dignity.• 1.21 million babies are aborted each year in
the USA since Roe v. Wade• Abortion in the USA generates approximately
$1 billion dollars per year – 1/3 of which comes from taxpayers subsidy.
• Economic gains, the breakdown in family and the perception that freedom is an absolute value are some factors that has contributed to abortion.
Catholic Teaching
• All innocent lives must be protected – including children conceived in cases of rape or incest.
• The child does not deserve the death penalty because of the crime of the father.
• The Church offers support for those who are facing unplanned pregnancies, as well as healing for those who have had an abortion.
Abortion
Is abortion really legal through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason in the United States?
Roe v. Wade (1973) ruled that though states did have an interest in protecting fetal life, such interest was not "compelling" until the fetus was viable (placing viability at the start of the third trimester). Thus, all state abortion laws that forbade abortion during the first six months of pregnancy were thereby invalidated. Third trimester abortions were declared to be legal only if the pregnancy threatened the life or health of the mother.
Doe v. Bolton (1973) defined "health of the mother" in such broad terms, that any prohibitions to 3rd trimester abortions were essentially eliminated: … We agree with the District Court … that the medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors – physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age – relevant to the well-being of the patient. All these factors may relate to health.
Opinion
Do you agree or disagree with the current laws on abortion? Why or why not?
Should abortion be allowed for cases of rape and incest?
How about in the case when a woman’s life is in danger?
DUE DATES
• October 30 – Chapter 3 Vocabulary; Service Evaluation
• November 3 – Social Justice Project Proposal• November 16 – Application Paper #3• Read Chapter 3
Film: Silent Scream
Silent Scream (Full Length)
Viewer Discretion is Advised
Worksheet – Abortion: The Teen Male
Perspective
Principle of Double Effect (pg. 80)
1. Is the action either morally good or morally neutral?
2. Is the intention of the action the good effect and not the bad effect that results from it?
3. Does the good outcome outweigh the bad one?
Is it moral or immoral? Explain
Abortion
In 1985, the Tebow family, with four children, was living in the Philippines as missionaries. Pam Tebow contractedamoebic dysentery, likely from contaminated drinking water. She fell into a coma and received strong drugs to combat the infection.
It turned out she was pregnant with her fifth child. Those drugs caused the placenta to detach from the uterine wall, depriving the fetus of oxygen. When it was realized that she was pregnant, doctors stopped the drugs but said that the high doses of medicine had already damaged the fetus.
The doctors believed there was danger to Pam and that the baby would not survive, or if he did, would have very serious problems. His parents went to the best doctor in their area of the Philippines who told her: “An abortion is the only way to save your life.”
Pam refused to have an abortion and asked for God’s help. She was in bed rest at a Manila hospital for the final two months of the pregnancy. Bob and Pam prayed for a healthy baby, but left that up to God.
After Timmy was born, the doctor who delivered him said only a small part of the placenta was attached, but it was “just enough to keep your baby nourished all these months.” In 2007 Tim Tebow won the Heisman Trophy while playing football for the University of Florida.
Promoting Life
• See page 82
Other Beginning of Life Issues: Objectives
• Embryonic stem-cell vs. adult stem cells• Why does the Church teach that using and
destroying embryos for stem cell research is morally wrong (evil means) even if it provides therapeutic treatment (good result).
• Why cloning and most forms of genetic engineering violates the dignity of life
Other Beginning of Life Issues
Note: Taking SummarizingEmbryonic Stem Cell Research Cloning and Genetic Manipulation
Stem cells have the potential to become other types of cells
Cloning embryos just to destroy them is gravely immoral
Destroying embryos to obtain stem cells is morally problematic; it is evil to treat human lives as disposable commodities.
Cloning humans is gravely immoral.
Using adult stem cells is morally permissible.
Every human has the right to be conceived from the mutual self-gift of husband and wife
Even the good intention of finding cures for diseases does not justify the evil means of destroying human life.
Cloning calls into question the possibility of cloning for a “superior” human being.
Stem Cell Research
• The Catholic Church does not oppose stem cell research, but the use of embryos to obtain stem cells – which leads to the destruction of the embryos.
• Using adult stem cells – which is acquired from placentas and umbilical cords are morally permissible.
• No cure has ever been discovered by the use of embryos.
• The end (good result) does not justify an immoral means (methods).
Cloning
• Cloning or creating embryos for research violates human dignity.
• This has become a multi-billion industry in and of itself.
• Every child deserves to be conceived through the act of a mother and father and not through a lab
• Manipulating genes could create a world in which people could create “superior” children, suggesting that there are also “inferior” children.
Other Beginning of Life Issues
Cloning for “Superiority” = Eugenics?
Logo from the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921, depicting the eugenics as a tree which unites a variety of different fields.
The end justifies the means
• Examples:– China enforces population control measures in
order to slow population growth and reduce poverty.
– A student cheats for good grades to become a doctor and serve the poor.
– A dad drives home at 90 mph each night to help his kids with homework.
• What’s wrong with this message?
Other Beginning of Life Issues
A good intention (for example, that of helping one's neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. On the other hand, an added bad intention (such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in and of itself, can be good (such as almsgiving). CCC, 1753
the end does not justify the means
Example 3 Someone argues that aiding a terminally sick person’s request for death is humane; in effect, saying that helping someone to kill himself is justified by the desire to eliminate the suffering.
Example 1 Someone argues that a pregnant woman feels she’s not ready to care for a child so she procures an abortion; in effect, saying that taking the life of her unborn child is justified by the benefit of avoiding motherhood.
Example 2 Someone argues that society has a right to execute a murder to avenge a killing; in effect, saying that the death of the criminal is justified by society’s desire for revenge.
CCC, 1753
A good intention (for example, that of helping one's neighbor) does not make behavior that is intrinsically disordered, such as lying and calumny, good or just. The end does not justify the means. Thus the condemnation of an innocent person cannot be justified as a legitimate means of saving the nation. On the other hand, an added bad intention (such as vainglory) makes an act evil that, in and of itself, can be good (such as almsgiving).
Letter to Mrs. Reagan and Mr. Michael J. Fox
Objectives: End of Life Concerns
• Define two types of euthanasia and explain why euthanasia in all of its forms is an assault on human dignity.
• Point to concrete examples of the mentality that leads to a culture of euthanasia.
• Relate Church teaching on capital punishment to the moral principles of self-defense and explain why capital punishment is very often, but not always, a moral wrong.
End of Life Concerns
Euthanasia
• Euthanasia – Any act or omission which, of itself or by intention, causes death in order to eliminate suffering.
• Two types of Euthanasia:– Involuntary – when someone else chooses
euthanasia for a dying or sick person.– Voluntary euthanasia – when the sick or dying
person chooses euthanasia for him or herself.
Euthanasia con’t
• Physician Assisted Suicide – the process of ending one’s own life with the help of a doctor rather than directly by the doctor’s hand.
• Development of the Euthanasia Mentality– Cultural climate that sees no value in suffering– Neglect of God has made people think that they
have sole control over life and death– Aging population has put pressure on a costly
health care system
Euthanasia con’t• All lives belong to God, and every human
person has value and the right to live. • However, the patient does not have to accept
every form of medical treatment. – Ordinary Medical Treatment– standard medical
care as well as food and water, even if the person is fed artificially.
– Extraordinary Medical Treatment – medical treatment that attempts to do more than keep a patient comfortable and cared for in a basic manner.
Reflection
Is there a value in suffering?
Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick
• What is this sacrament?• Who can receive it?• What are the spiritual benefits of the
sacrament?
End of Life Concerns
Goals of Hospice Care• Manage pain and any other symptoms
that cause discomfort and distress• Create a comfortable
environment for the patient• Allow the patient to be close
to family and loved ones during the dying process
• Give relief to the patient’s caregivers
• Offer counseling for the patient and those close to the patient
Hospice
End of Life Concerns
End of Life Concerns
Capital Punishment• Church position is seen in light of self-defense• Four premises regarding the Church’s Teaching on Self
Defense – applies to individuals and society– Respecting the dignity of the human person includes
protecting one’s own life.– Murder takes an innocent life, whereas an unjust
attacker is not “innocent” in that particular moment.– Taking the life of an aggressor is always a last resort
when it is necessary to defend life would not be murder.
– Taking the life of an aggressor is always a last resort; if there are other alternatives, that should be used instead.
How is Capital Punishment morally different than abortion, destroying embryos, and euthanasia?
No One Is Beyond Redemption (pg. 93)
• Luke 15:11-32•Matthew 5:38-39• Luke 6:35-37• John 8:1-11• Romans 12:14-19