chapter 6copyright ©2010 by south-western, a division of cengage learning. all rights reserved econ...

17
Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-2011 6 CHAPTER Productiv ity and Growth Macro

Upload: ronald-alexander

Post on 05-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

ECON

Designed byAmy McGuire, B-books, Ltd.

McEachern 2010-2011

6CHAPTERProductivity and Growth

Macro

Page 2: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO1

Labor Productivity

Labor– 70% of production costs– Easily measured– Available statistics Labor productivity– Increases with• Human and physical capital per worker

Page 3: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO1

Per-Worker Production Function

Relationship • Capital per worker• Output per worker Per-worker production function• Upward sloping• Diminishing slope• Diminishing marginal returns from capital Increased productivity• More capital per worker• Movement along PF

Page 4: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO1

Per-Worker Production Function

PF

Out

put

per

wor

ker

y

Capital per worker0 k

The per-worker production function, PF, shows a direct relationship between the amount of capital per worker, k, and the output per worker, y.

The bowed shape of PF reflects the law of diminishing marginal returns from capital: As more capital is added to a given number of workers, output per worker increases but at a diminishing rate and eventually could turn negative.

Exhibit 2

Page 5: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO1

Impact of a Technological Breakthrough on the Per-Worker Production Function

A technological breakthrough increases output per worker at each level of capital per worker.

Better technology makes workers more productive.

This is shown by an upward rotation of the per-worker production function from PF to PF’.

An improvement in rules of the game would have a similar effect.

Exhibit 3

PF

Capital per worker0 k

PF’

Out

put

per

wor

ker

y

y’

Page 6: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO2

Productivity and Growth in Practice

Industrial market economies– Higher standard of living– 15% of world population– Produce 75% of world’s output Developing countries– Poor countries– Low standard of living– Less human and physical capital– Low labor productivity

Page 7: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO2

Percent of Adult Population with at Least a College Education: 2003 and 2006

Exhibit 4

Page 8: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO2 Long-Term Trend in U.S. Labor Productivity Growth: Annual Average by Decade

Exh

ibit

5

Page 9: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

LO2

Output per Capita

Standard of living– Output per capita– Real GDP per capita US– General upward trend– During recessions• Decrease in productivity

Page 10: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

U.S. Real GDP per Capita Has Nearly Tripled Since 1959LO2

Exh

ibit

7

Page 11: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

U.S. GDP per Capita Is Highest of Major Economies

LO2 Exhibit 8

Page 12: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

U.S. Real GDP per Capita Outgrew That of Most Other Major Economies Since 1982

LO2 Exhibit 9

Page 13: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

Technological Change and Unemployment

Technological change Job dislocations Displaced workers More affordable products Higher demand Increased employment and production “Does technological change lead to unemploymen

t?” No statistical evidence

LO3

Page 14: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

Research and Development

Basic research General search for knowledge First step for technological advancement Yields a higher return

to society Applied research Answer particular questions Develop specific products

LO3

Page 15: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

Industrial Policy

Industrial policy Government Use taxes, subsidies, regulations, coordination Nurture technologies Protect domestic industries Concerns Government’s efficiency Giveaway programs

LO3

Page 16: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

Do Economies Converge?

Convergence theory Developing countries Can grow faster than

advanced ones Should eventually

close the gap Explanations Adopt existing technologies Invest in human resources

LO3

Page 17: Chapter 6Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern 2010-

Chapter 6 Copyright ©2010 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved

Do Economies Converge?

Evidence Few poor countries are closing the gap Others Slow growth Lower relative standard of living Trapped Explanations High birthrates; Difference in human capital Unstable economic environment No institutions; Bad infrastructures; Civil war

LO3