chapter 9. the evolution of...
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 9 Opener: When a bull elk bugles, other males listen
Chapter 9.
The Evolution of Communication
9.2 Concentrations of testosterone in male and female spotted hyenas (Part 1)
Reproductively active Reproductively inactive
Extra androgen aggression hypothesis
9.2 Concentrations of testosterone in male and female spotted hyenas (Part 2)
Extra androgen aggression hypothesis
9.3 A cost of the pseudopenis for female spotted hyenas
Androstenedione Testosterone
Leading to
peudopenis
In female fetus
10~20% female
die during the
delivery
Higher reproductive cost…but why?
9.1 The pseudopenis of the female spotted hyena can be erected
Reduction of aggressive attacks from males
To demonstrate their rank relative to other females
Male-like camouflage
(sexual mimicry hypothesis)
9.4 Competition for food among spotted hyenas may favor highly aggressive individuals
Females are aggressive so that sometimes they can be a alpha female Getting a priority of access to foods
Comes dramatic gains in reproductive success
Young alpha females grow faster more likely to survive
Extra aggression hypothesis
9.5 Dominance greatly advances female reproductive success in the spotted hyena
Extra aggression hypothesis
Social dominance increases reproductive success!
9.1 The pseudopenis of the female spotted hyena can be erected
With a psudopenis, female can increase social attractions
Or reduction of aggressive attack by males
Greeting ceremony
Social bonding (harmony) hypothesis
9.6 Ultrasonic communication
Male whistling moth produce USV by
striking the knobby on their fore wingsPlay back the male USV attract other
moths
How communication begin?
9.11 A possible evolutionary pathway from swimming to full flight in the stoneflies
9.13 Sensory exploitation and the evolution of a courtship signal in Neumania papillator
Sensory Exploitation: courtship trembling
Prey-like stimuli
To induce net standing
Targeting sperms to female genitalia
9.14 Two evolutionary scenarios for the evolution of male courtship trembling in Koenikea (Part 1)
Absent
present
9.15 A female cichlid fish (left) is attracted to the anal fin of a male by the orange spots on the fin
9.16 Food, carotenoids, and female mate preferences in the guppy
Good food Male has a same color with the food Good feeling to him
9.17 Sexual preferences for orange spots match foraging preferences by female guppies
If your girl friend like „떢볶이‟ …
9.12 An ancestral signal has been co-opted in some bowerbirds
Induction of higher preference• Male frog sound + novel acoustical elements
• Yellow plastic strip to the tail of platyfish
• Adding feather crests on the heads of auklets
• Bright red spangles to the nest of stickleback fish
No difference• Glued plumes to the tail of house pinches
Artificial courtship signals
What is the mechanism of sensory exploitation?
Where is the preference from?
Lack a blue patch on abdomen
which other members have
9.19 Receivers can respond to an ancestral signal not present in their species
Giving a trait that their ancestors may have
9.20 Sensory exploitation and swordtail phylogeny
Then when this preference evolved?
Genus Xiphophorus
Preference to ling tail evolved in the ancestor of Priapella
before long tail ever evolved
9.21 Panda’s thumb
Panda Principle: Carnivore Herbivore
Panda uses sesamoid bone like a thumb of human’s
Carnivores’ paw
9.22 The panda principle is evident in the sexual behavior of a parthenogenetic whiptail lizard
Natural selection is blind and cannot play God
9.22 The panda principle is evident in the sexual behavior of a parthenogenetic whiptail lizard
Discussion question:
METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
Random typing the odds for right typing is vanishingly small
One in million million million million million … 1/1040
e.g. Hemoglobin (146 amino acids) 1/10190
e.g. Lotto probability, 4.5 trillion (4,500,000,000,000) 4.5 x1012
Cumulative selection Select among, SWAJS MEIURNZMMVASJDNA YPQZK
If sequence is right, that is conserved in next generations
It takes 40 to 70 generations
‘Hamlet’, by Shakespeare
9.22 The panda principle is evident in the sexual behavior of a parthenogenetic whiptail lizard
Cumulative selection in „The Blind Watch Maker‟ by Richard Dawkins
It makes sense? Or no sense?
Generation 01: WDLTMNLT DTJBKWIRZREZLMQCO PGeneration 02: WDLTMNLT DTJBSWIRZREZLMQCO PGeneration 10: MDLDMNLS ITJISWHRZREZ MECS PGeneration 20: MELDINLS IT ISWPRKE Z WECSELGeneration 30: METHINGS IT ISWLIKE B WECSELGeneration 40: METHINKS IT IS LIKE I WEASELGeneration 43: METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
9.22 The panda principle is evident in the sexual behavior of a parthenogenetic whiptail lizard
Cumulative selection in „The Blind Watch Maker‟ by Richard Dawkins
WDLDMNLT DTJBKWIRZUEXLMQCOP
WDLTMNLT DTJBSWIRZUEXLMQCOP
MDLDMLS ITJISWHRZREZ MECS P
MELDINLS IT ISWPRKE Z WECSEL
METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
Begin
1st
10nd
20nd
43nd
28 nucleotides
1) He don’t consider the time for one typing (single mutation)…
2/26 (17%) mutations can occur during one generations?
One point mutation rate is 1/1,000,000,000 (1/109)
150 mutations found in 3,000,000,000 nucleotides in the one generation of
monkey , thus, the % mutation is 0.000005 (5x10-6)%
17/0.000005= 3,400,000 generations without considering sequences
2) Two mutations at 4th and 13th 1/109 X 1/109 = 1/1018
Thus, 1018 trials should happen for the two right mutations
150 X1018 = 1.5 X 1020 generations
9.23 A group of ravens feeding on a carcass to which they were attracted by a yelling companion
Discussion question:
Calling companion to foods…Why?
9.23 A group of ravens feeding on a carcass to which they were attracted by a yelling companion
Discussion question:
Calling companion to foods…Why?
1) Since they are relatives…
2) ‘Attract-a-carcass-opener’ hypothesis
3) ‘Diluted-risk-of-predation’ hypothesis
4) ‘Gang-up-on-the-territorial-residents’
By Bernd Heinrich
9.23 A group of ravens feeding on a carcass to which they were attracted by a yelling companion
Discussion question:
Calling companion to foods…Why?
-Resident territory owners should never yell
-Non-resident ravens should yell
-Yelling should facilitate a mass assault on carcass by nonresident ravens
-Resident pair ravens should be unable to repel a communal assault on their resource
-A food of bonanza should be eaten by resident pair alone or a mob of ravens
By Bernd Heinrich
‘Gang-up-on-the-territorial-residents’ hypothesis
Resident pair don’t
yell at carcass
Many young non-residents
yell at carcass
Competition on the food
9.23 A group of ravens feeding on a carcass to which they were attracted by a yelling companion
Discussion question:
Calling companion to foods…Why?
By Bernd Heinrich
‘Gang-up-on-the-territorial-residents’ hypothesis
Non-yelling groupYelling group
9.25 Predation risk has affected the evolution of begging calls in warblers (Part 1)9.24 Yelling is a recruitment signal
Discussion question: Noisy begging call
Why baby birds do cry?
In reality, nest with begging call playing is vulnerable to predator
By David Haskell
Tree-nester’s sound is more dangerous
9.24 Yelling is a recruitment signal
Discussion question: Noisy begging call
Why baby birds do cry?
By David Haskell
1) Sibling scramble competition
2) Honest signaling
Hypothesis:
-Food-deprived baby robins:
The hungry nestlings beg more loudly but so do the better-fed siblings
There is no yield ^^;;
Experiments:
-Group comparison: good, average, poor condition groups of petrel babies
Poor group generate calls at faster rate
9.26 Testosterone affects begging rate and feeding rate in black-headed gull chicks
9.7 In the black-headed gull, the female lays three eggs, but
begins incubating before all of the eggs are laid. As a result,
the first egg laid gets a head start and produces a senior chick
that typically is larger than its siblings. It therefore begs more
effectively and usually gets more food than its brothers and
sisters. But mother gulls put more androgens into eggs that
will hatch later, and the extra androgens enable junior gull
chicks to beg more vigorously and claim more food than they
would otherwise (Figure 9.26 of the textbook) [359]. How does
this example illustrate the difficulties in establishing who has
the upper hand in the signaling interactions between young
birds and their parents?
9.28 The European cuckoo chick’s begging call matches that of four baby reed warblers (Part 1)
Parasite chick call more loudly
9.29 The cuckoo’s begging calls stimulate more frequent feeding by its host parents
Parents become more hurry…
9.30 Illegitimate receivers can detect the signals of their prey (Part 1)
Exploitations by illegitimate receivers
9.30 Illegitimate receivers can detect the signals of their prey (Part 2)
Females prefer males who add the chuck element to their call
But fringe-lipped bats also are attracted to the chuck sounds twice than whine only
9.31 Great tit alarm calls
Decrease the possible exploitation by illegitimate receiver
To predator
To mates or offspring
9.34 Deep croaks deter rivals
Toad croaks are honest signals…
Large male low pitch sound
Small male high pitch sound
Offender can estimate the size of defender
Smaller defender or offender can save
time and energy by giving up early
9.35 Threat displays are energetically demanding in the side-blotched lizard (Part 1)
Examples of honest signals
9.39 A firefly femme fatale
Exploitations by illegitimate signalers
Photuris female firefly
Photinus male firefly
Flashing to attract
photinus male firefly
9.40 A deceptive signaler
9.13 Develop an honest signal hypothesis and
a deception hypothesis to account for the fact
that when copulating, males of some
butterflies transfer a substance to their mates
that makes these females sexually
unappealing to other males [28]. What do
you need to know to determine which
explanation is correct?
Homework